Bhatti et al.

BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176

DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0464-z

CORRESPONDENCE Open Access

International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force

consensus proposal: medical treatment of
canine epilepsy in Europe
Sofie F.M. Bhatti1*, Luisa De Risio2, Karen Muñana3, Jacques Penderis4, Veronika M. Stein5, Andrea Tipold5,
Mette Berendt6, Robyn G. Farquhar7, Andrea Fischer8, Sam Long9, Wolfgang Löscher10, Paul J.J. Mandigers11,
Kaspar Matiasek12, Akos Pakozdy13, Edward E. Patterson14, Simon Platt15, Michael Podell16, Heidrun Potschka17,
Clare Rusbridge18,19 and Holger A. Volk20

Abstract
In Europe, the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed for dogs has grown considerably over the last years.
Nevertheless, the same questions remain, which include, 1) when to start treatment, 2) which drug is best used
initially, 3) which adjunctive AED can be advised if treatment with the initial drug is unsatisfactory, and 4) when
treatment changes should be considered. In this consensus proposal, an overview is given on the aim of AED
treatment, when to start long-term treatment in canine epilepsy and which veterinary AEDs are currently in use for
dogs. The consensus proposal for drug treatment protocols, 1) is based on current published evidence-based literature,
2) considers the current legal framework of the cascade regulation for the prescription of veterinary drugs in Europe,
and 3) reflects the authors’ experience. With this paper it is aimed to provide a consensus for the management of
canine idiopathic epilepsy. Furthermore, for the management of structural epilepsy AEDs are inevitable in addition
to treating the underlying cause, if possible.
Keywords: Dog, Epileptic seizure, Epilepsy, Treatment

Background drugs in Europe, and 3) reflects the authors’ experience.

In Europe, the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) li- With this paper it is aimed to provide a consensus for the
censed for dogs has grown considerably over the last management of canine idiopathic epilepsy. Furthermore,
years. Nevertheless, the same questions remain, which for the management of structural epilepsy AEDs are in-
include, 1) when to start treatment, 2) which drug is best evitable in addition to treating the underlying cause, if
used initially, 3) which adjunctive AED can be advised if possible.
treatment with the initial drug is unsatisfactory, and 4) At present, there is no doubt that the administration
when treatment changes should be considered. In this of AEDs is the mainstay of therapy. In fact, the term
consensus proposal, an overview is given on the aim of AED is rather inappropriate as the mode of action of
AED treatment, when to start long-term treatment in most AEDs is to suppress epileptic seizures, not epilep-
canine epilepsy and which veterinary AEDs are currently togenesis or the pathophysiological mechanisms of epi-
in use for dogs. The consensus proposal for drug treatment lepsy. Perhaps, in the future, the term anti-seizure drugs
protocols, 1) is based on current published evidence-based might be more applicable in veterinary neurology, a term
literature [17], 2) considers the current legal framework of that is increasingly used in human epilepsy. Additionally,
the cascade regulation for the prescription of veterinary it is known that epileptic seizure frequency appears to
increase over time in a subpopulation of dogs with un-
* Correspondence: sofie.bhatti@ugent.be treated idiopathic epilepsy, reflecting the need of AED
1
Department of Small Animal Medicine and Clinical Biology, Faculty of treatment in these patients [63].
Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820,
Belgium
In our consensus proposal on classification and termin-
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article ology we have defined idiopathic epilepsy as a disease in
© 2015 Bhatti et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://
creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
its own right, per se. A genetic origin of idiopathic epilepsy
is supported by genetic testing (when available) and a gen-
etic influence is supported by a high breed prevalence
(>2 %), genealogical analysis and /or familial accumulation
of epileptic individuals. However in the clinical setting
idiopathic epilepsy remains most commonly a diagnosis of
exclusion following diagnostic investigations for causes of
reactive seizures and structural epilepsy.
Aims of AED treatment
The ideal goal of AED therapy is to balance the ability
to eliminate epileptic seizures with the quality of life of
the patient. Seizure eradication is often not likely in
dogs. More realistic goals are to decrease seizure fre-
quency, duration, severity and the total number of epi-
leptic seizures that occur over a short time span, with
no or limited and acceptable AED adverse effects to
maximize the dog’s and owner’s quality of life. Clinicians
should approach treatment using the following paradigm
[23, 76, 91, 92, 120]:
– Decide when to start AED treatment
– Choose the most appropriate AED and dosage
– Know if and when to monitor serum AED
concentrations and adjust treatment accordingly
– Know when to add or change to a different AED
– Promote pet owner compliance
When to recommend maintenance AED treatment?
Definitive, evidence-based data on when to start AED
therapy in dogs based on seizure frequency and type is
lacking. As such, extrapolation from human medicine may
be possible to provide treatment guidelines. Clinicians
should consider the general health of the patient, as well
as the owner’s lifestyle, financial limitations, and comfort
with the proposed therapeutic regimen. Individualized
therapy is paramount for choosing a treatment plan. As a
general rule, the authors recommend initiation of long-
term treatment in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy when any
one of the following criteria is present:
– Interictal period of ≤ 6 months (i.e. 2 or more
epileptic seizures within a 6 month period)
– Status epilepticus or cluster seizures
– The postictal signs are considered especially
severe (e.g. aggression, blindness) or last longer
than 24 hours
– The epileptic seizure frequency and/or duration
is increasing and/or seizure severity is
deteriorating over 3 interictal periods
In humans, the decision regarding when to recommend
AED treatment is based on a number of risk factors
(e.g. risk of recurrence, seizure type, tolerability, adverse
Page 2 of 16
effects) [42, 115]. In people, clear proof exists that there is
no benefit initiating AED treatment after a single unpro-
voked seizure [42], but there is evidence to support start-
ing treatment after the second seizure [43, 108]. In dogs,
long-term seizure management is thought to be most suc-
cessful when appropriate AED therapy is started early in
the course of the disease, especially in dogs with a high
seizure density and in dog breeds known to suffer from a
severe form of epilepsy [12−14]. A total number of ≥ 10
seizures during the first 6 months of the disease appeared
to be correlated with a poor outcome in Australian Shep-
herds with idiopathic epilepsy [132]. Furthermore, recent
evidence exists that seizure density is a crucial risk factor,
experiencing cluster seizures, and being male is associated
with poor AED response [84].
A strong correlation exists in epileptic people between
a high seizure frequency prior to AED treatment and
poor AED response [16, 34, 59]. Historically, this has
been attributed to kindling, in which seizure activity
leads to intensification of subsequent seizures [117].
However, there is little clinical evidence that kindling
plays a role in either dogs [54] or humans [111] with re-
current seizures. In humans, a multifactorial pathogen-
esis is suggested [14, 52]. Recent epidemiologic data
suggest that there are differences in the intrinsic severity
of epilepsy among individuals, and these differences in-
fluence a patient’s response to medication and long-term
outcome. Additionally, evidence for seizure-associated
alterations that affect the pharmacodynamics and
pharmacokinetics of AEDs have been suggested [99].
Breed-related differences in epilepsy severity have been
described in dogs, with a moderate to severe clinical
course reported in Australian Shepherds [132], Border
Collies [49, 84], Italian Spinoni [24], German Shepherds
and Staffordshire Bull Terriers [84], whereas a less se-
vere form of the disease has been described in a different
cohort of Collies (mainly rough coated) [77], Labrador
Retrievers [7] and Belgian Shepherds [45]. Consequently,
genetics may affect the success of treatment and may ex-
plain why some breeds are more predisposed to drug re-
sistant epilepsy [3, 77].
Choice of AED therapy
There are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the
choice of AEDs in dogs. When choosing an AED for the
management of epilepsy in dogs several factors need to
be taken into account (AED-specific factors (e.g. regula-
tory aspects, safety, tolerability, adverse effects, drug inter-
actions, frequency of administration), dog-related factors
(e.g. seizure type, frequency and aetiology, underlying
pathologies such as kidney/hepatic/gastrointestinal prob-
lems) and owner-related factors (e.g. lifestyle, financial cir-
cumstances)) [23]. In the end, however, AED choice is
often determined on a case-by-case basis.
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
Until recently, primary treatment options for dogs
with epilepsy have focused mainly on phenobarbital (PB)
and potassium bromide (KBr) due to their long standing
history, widespread availability, and low cost. While both
AEDs are still widely used in veterinary practice, several
newer AEDs approved for use in people are also being
used for the management of canine idiopathic epilepsy
mainly as add-on treatment. Moreover, since early 2013,
imepitoin has been introduced in most European coun-
tries for the management of recurrent single generalized
epileptic seizures in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy.
Several AEDs of the older generation approved for
humans have been shown to be unsuitable for use in
dogs as most have an elimination half-life that is too
short to allow convenient dosing by owners, these in-
clude phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, and etho-
suximide [119]. Some are even toxic in dogs such as
lamotrigine (the metabolite is cardiotoxic) [26, 136] and
vigabatrin (associated with neurotoxicity and haemolytic
anemia) [113, 131, 138].
Since the 1990s, new AEDs with improved tolerability,
fewer side effects and reduced drug interaction potential
have been approved for the management of epilepsy in
humans. Many of these novel drugs appear to be rela-
tively safe in dogs, these include levetiracetam, zonisa-
mide, felbamate, topiramate, gabapentin, and pregabalin.
Pharmacokinetic studies on lacosamide [68] and rufina-
mide [137] support the potential use of these drugs in
dogs, but they have not been evaluated in the clinical
setting. Although these newer drugs have gained consid-
erable popularity in the management of canine epilepsy,
scientific data on their safety and efficacy are very lim-
ited and cost is often prohibitive.
Phenobarbital
Efficacy
PB has the longest history of chronic use of all AEDs in
veterinary medicine. After decades of use, it has been
approved in 2009 for the prevention of seizures caused
by generalized epilepsy in dogs. PB has a favourable
pharmacokinetic profile and is relatively safe [2, 87, 97].
PB seems to be effective in decreasing seizure frequency
in approximately 60−93 % of dogs with idiopathic epi-
lepsy when plasma concentrations are maintained within
the therapeutic range of 25−35 mg/l [10, 31, 74, 105].
According to Charalambous et al. (2014) [17], there is
overall good evidence for recommending the use of PB
as a monotherapy AED in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy.
Moreover, the superior efficacy of PB was demonstrated
in a randomized clinical trial comparing PB to bromide
(Br) as first-line AED in dogs, in which 85 % of dogs ad-
ministered PB became seizure-free for 6 months com-
pared with 52 % of dogs administered Br [10]. This
study demonstrated a higher efficacy of PB compared to
Page 3 of 16
Br as a monotherapy, providing better seizure control
and showing fewer side effects.
Pharmacokinetics
PB is rapidly (within 2h) absorbed after oral administra-
tion in dogs, with a reported bioavailability of approxi-
mately 90 % [2, 87]. Peak serum concentrations are
achieved approximately 4−8h after oral administration in
dogs [2, 97]. The initial elimination half-life in normal
dogs has been reported to range from 37−73h after mul-
tiple oral dosing [96]. Plasma protein binding is approxi-
mately 45 % in dogs [36]. PB crosses the placenta and
can be teratogenic.
PB is metabolized primarily by hepatic microsomal en-
zymes and approximately 25 % is excreted unchanged in
the urine. There is individual variability in PB absorption,
excretion and elimination half-life [2, 87, 97]. In dogs, PB
is a potent inducer of cytochrome P450 enzyme activity in
the liver [48], and this significantly increases hepatic pro-
duction of reactive oxygen species, thus increasing the risk
of hepatic injury [107]. Therefore PB is contraindicated in
dogs with hepatic dysfunction. The induction of cyto-
chrome P450 activity in the liver can lead to autoinduction
or accelerated clearance of itself over time, also known as
metabolic tolerance, as well as endogenous compounds
(such as thyroid hormones) [40, 48]. As a result, with
chronic PB administration in dogs, its total body clearance
increases and elimination half-life decreases progressively
which stabilizes between 30−45 days after starting therapy
[97]. This can result in reduction of PB serum concen-
trations and therapeutic failure and therefore, monitor-
ing of serum PB concentrations is very important for
dose modulation over time.
A parenteral form of PB is available for intramuscular
(IM) or intravenous (IV) administration. Different PB
formulations are available in different countries, it should
be emphasized, however, that IM formulations cannot be
used IV and vice versa. Parenteral administration of PB is
useful for administering maintenance therapy in hospital-
ized patients that are unable to take oral medication. The
pharmacokinetics of IM PB have not been explored in
dogs, however, studies in humans have shown a similar
absorption after IM administration compared to oral ad-
ministration [135]. The elimination half-life in dogs after a
single IV dose is approximately 93h [87].
Pharmacokinetic interactions
In dogs, chronic PB administration can affect the dispos-
ition of other co-administered medications which are me-
tabolized by cytochrome P450 subfamilies and/or bound
to plasma proteins [48]. PB can alter the pharmacokinetics
and as a consequence may decrease the therapeutic ef-
fect of other AEDs (levetiracetam, zonisamide, and ben-
zodiazepines) as well as corticosteroids, cyclosporine,
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
metronidazole, voriconazole, digoxin, digitoxin, phenyl-
butazone and some anaesthetics (e.g. thiopental) [23, 33,
72, 82, 130]. As diazepam is used as first-line medicine for
emergency use (e.g. status epilepticus) in practice it should
be emphasized to double the IV or rectal dose of diazepam
in dogs treated chronically with PB [130]. Concurrent ad-
ministration of PB and medications that inhibit hepatic
microsomal cytochrome P450 enzymes such as cimetidine,
omeprazole, lansoprazole, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim,
fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, ketoconazole, fluconazole,
itraconazole, fluoxetine, felbamate and topiramate may
inhibit PB metabolism, increase serum concentration and
can result in toxicity [10].
Common adverse effects
Most of the adverse effects due to PB are dose dependent,
occur early after treatment initiation or dose increase and
generally disappear or decrease in the subsequent weeks due
to development of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
tolerance [35, 121] (Table 1). The adverse effects include
sedation, ataxia, polyphagia, polydipsia and polyuria. For an
in-depth review on the adverse effects of PB, the reader is
referred to comprehensive book chapters [23, 32, 91].
Table 1 Most common reported adverse effects seen in dogs treated with PB, imepitoin and KBr (rarely reported and/or
idiosyncratic adverse effects are indicated in grey
AED
PB
Imepitoin
KBr
Page 4 of 16
Idiosyncratic adverse effects
These effects occur uncommonly in dogs and include
hepatotoxicity [13, 22, 39, 75], haematologic abnormalities
(anaemia, and/or thrombocytopenia, and/or neutropenia)
[51, 56]), superficial necrolytic dermatitis [66], potential
risk for pancreatitis [38, 46], dyskinesia [58], anxiety [58],
and hypoalbuminaemia [41] (Table 1). Most of these
idiosyncratic reactions are potentially reversible with dis-
continuation of PB. For an in-depth review on the idiosyn-
cratic adverse effects of PB the reader is referred to
comprehensive book chapters [23, 32, 91].
Laboratory changes
Laboratory changes related to chronic PB administration in
dogs include elevation in serum liver enzyme activities [39,
41, 75], cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations [41]. Alter-
ations in some endocrine function testing may occur (thyroid
and adrenal function, pituitary-adrenal axis) [21, 41, 128]. For
an in-depth review on these laboratory changes the reader is
referred to comprehensive book chapters [23, 32, 91].
Dose and monitoring (Fig. 1)
The recommended oral starting dose of PB in dogs is
2.5−3 mg/kg BID. Subsequently, the oral dosage is tailored
Adverse effects in dogs
Sedation
Ataxia
Polyphagia
Polydipsia/polyuria
Polyphagia (often transient)
Sedation
Ataxia and pelvic limb weakness
Polydipsia/polyuria
Polyphagia
Nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176 Page 5 of 16

Fig. 1 PB treatment flow diagram for decision making during seizure management in an otherwise healthy dog. The authors advise to start with
PB (and add KBr if inadequate seizure control after optimal use of PB (Fig. 3)): in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy experiencing recurrent single
generalised epileptic seizures; in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy experiencing cluster seizures or status epilepticus; in dogs with other epilepsy
types. *Criteria for (in)adequate seizure control with regard to efficacy and tolerability (see Consensus proposal: Outcome of therapeutic
interventions in canine and feline epilepsy [94]). 1. Treatment efficacious: a: Achievement of complete treatment success (i.e. seizure freedom or
extension of the interseizure interval to three times the longest pretreatment interseizure interval and for a minimum of three months (ideally > 1
year); b: Achievement of partial treatment success (i.e. a reduction in seizure frequency including information on seizure incidence (usually at least
50 % or more reduction defines a drug responder), a reduction in seizure severity, or a reduction in frequency of seizure clusters and/or status
epilepticus). 2. Treatment not tolerated i.e. appearance of severe adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the AED

to the individual patient based on seizure control, adverse
effects and serum concentration monitoring.
Because of considerable variability in the pharmaco-
kinetics of PB among individuals, the serum concentra-
tion should be measured 14 days after starting therapy
(baseline concentration for future adjustments) or after
a change in dose. To evaluate the effect of metabolic
tolerance, a second PB serum concentration can be
measured 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. Recom-
mendations on optimal timing of blood collection for
serum PB concentration monitoring in dogs vary among
studies [23]. Generally, serum concentrations can be
checked at any time in the dosing cycle as the change
in PB concentrations through a daily dosing interval is
not therapeutically relevant once steady-state has been
achieved [62, 70]. However, in dogs receiving a dose of
5 mg/kg BID or higher, trough concentrations were sig-
nificantly lower than non-trough concentrations and
serum PB concentration monitoring at the same time
post-drug dosing was recommended, in order to allow
accurate comparison of results in these dogs [70]. Another
study recommended performing serum PB concentration
monitoring on a trough sample as a significant difference
between peak and trough PB concentration was identified
in individual dogs [10]. The therapeutic range of PB in
serum is 15 mg/l to 40 mg/l in dogs. However, it is the au-
thors’ opinion that in the majority of dogs a serum PB
concentration between 25−30 mg/l is required for optimal
seizure control. Serum concentrations of more than 35
mg/l are associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity
and should be avoided [22, 75]. In case of inadequate seiz-
ure control, serum PB concentrations must be used to
guide increases in drug dose. Dose adjustments can be cal-
culated according to the following formula (Formula A):
New PB total daily dosage in mg
¼ ðdesired serum PB concentration=actual serum PB concentrationÞ
 actual PB total daily dosage in mg
A dog with adequate seizure control, but serum drug
concentrations below the reported therapeutic range,
does not require alteration of the drug dose, as this
serum concentration may be sufficient for that individ-
ual. Generally, the desired serum AED concentration for
individual patients should be the lowest possible concen-
tration associated with >50 % reduction in seizure fre-
quency or seizure-freedom and absence of intolerable
adverse effects [23].
In animals with cluster seizures, status epilepticus or
high seizure frequency, PB can be administered at a
loading dose of 15−20 mg/kg IV, IM or PO divided in
multiple doses of 3−5 mg/kg over 24−48h to obtain a
therapeutic brain concentration quickly and then sustain
it [10]. Serum PB concentrations can be measured 1−3
days after loading. Some authors load as soon as possible
(over 40 to 60 min) and start with a loading dose of 10
to 12 mg/kg IV followed by two further boluses of 4 to 6
mg/kg 20 min apart.
Complete blood cell count, biochemical profile (includ-
ing cholesterol and triglycerides), and bile acid stimulation
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
test should be performed before starting PB treatment and
periodically at 3 months and then every 6 months during
treatment. In case of adequate seizure control, serum PB
concentrations should be monitored every 6 months. If
the dog is in remission or has no seizures, a periodical
control every 12 months is advised.
Imepitoin
Efficacy
Imepitoin was initially developed as a new AED for
humans, but, the more favourable pharmacokinetic profile
of imepitoin in dogs versus humans led to the decision to
develop imepitoin for the treatment of canine idiopathic
epilepsy [102]. Based on randomized controlled trials that
demonstrated antiepileptic efficacy, high tolerability and
safety in epileptic dogs, the drug was approved in 2013 for
this indication in Europe [64, 98, 122]. It has been recom-
mended to use imepitoin in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy
experiencing recurrent single generalized epileptic sei-
zures, however, its efficacy has not yet been demonstrated
in dogs with cluster seizures or status epilepticus [30]. In a
recent randomized controlled study [122], the efficacy of
imepitoin was compared with PB in 226 client-owned
dogs. The administration of imepitoin twice daily in incre-
mental doses of 10, 20 or 30 mg/kg demonstrated that the
majority of dogs with idiopathic epilepsy were managed
successfully with imepitoin without significant difference
to the efficacy of PB. The frequency of adverse events (e.g.
sedation, polydipsia, polyphagia) was significantly higher
in the PB group [122]. In a study by Rieck et al. (2006)
[98], dogs with chronic epilepsy not responding to PB or
primidone received imepitoin (in its initial formulation) or
KBr as adjunct AED and the seizure frequency improved
to a similar degree in both groups. According to Chara-
lambous et al. (2014) [17], there is good evidence for
recommending the use of imepitoin as monotherapy in
dogs with recurrent single generalized epileptic seizures,
but insufficient evidence for use as adjunct AED. At
present, scientific data and evidence-based guidelines on
which AED can best be combined with imepitoin are lack-
ing, and further research is needed. Nevertheless, at this
moment, the authors recommend the use of PB as adjunct
AED in dogs receiving the maximum dose of imepitoin
and experiencing poor seizure control. According to the
authors, in case of combined therapy with imepitoin and
PB, it is advised to slowly wean off imepitoin over several
months if seizure control appears successful on PB and/or
to reduce the dose of imepitoin if adverse effects (e.g. sed-
ation) occur (Fig. 2).
Pharmacokinetics
Following oral administration of imepitoin at a dose of
30 mg/kg in healthy Beagle dogs, high plasma levels
were observed within 30 min, but maximal plasma levels
Page 6 of 16
were only reached after 2−3h following a prolonged ab-
sorption time [101]. The elimination half-life was found
to be short; approximately 1.5 to 2h. However, in an-
other study in Beagle dogs, a longer half-life (~6 h) was
found after higher doses of imepitoin, and accumulation
of plasma levels was seen during chronic BID treatment
[64]. Also, it has to be considered that Beagle dogs elim-
inate AEDs more rapidly than other dog strains [122].
Despite the short half-life in healthy Beagle dogs, this
pharmacokinetic profile is reported as adequate to main-
tain therapeutically active concentrations with twice
daily dosing in dogs [64, 122]. Imepitoin is extensively
metabolized in the liver prior to elimination. In dogs,
imepitoin is mainly excreted via the faecal route rather
than the urinary route. Neither reduced kidney function
nor impaired liver function is likely to greatly influence
the pharmacokinetics of imepitoin [122].
Pharmacokinetic interactions and adverse reactions
There is no information on pharmacokinetic interactions
between imepitoin and other medications. Although,
imepitoin is a low affinity partial agonist for the benzodi-
azepine binding site of the GABAA receptor it has not
prevented the pharmacological activity of full benzodi-
azepine agonists such as diazepam in the clinical setting
(e.g. in dogs with status epilepticus) [122]. Consequently,
because the affinity of diazepam for the GABAA receptor
is much higher than imepitoin, care should be taken in
the emergency setting [122]. Therefore, dogs with idio-
pathic epilepsy treated with imepitoin and presented in
status epilepticus might require, in addition to diazepam,
an additional AED parenterally (e.g. PB, levetiracetam).
Mild and most commonly transient adverse reactions
(Table 1) have been reported in dogs administered 10−30
mg/kg BID of imepitoin in its initial formulation; polypha-
gia at the beginning of the treatment, hyperactivity,
polyuria, polydipsia, somnolence, hypersalivation, em-
esis, ataxia, lethargy, diarrhoea, prolapsed nictitating mem-
branes, decreased vision and sensitivity to sound [64, 98].
As part of the development of imepitoin for the treat-
ment of canine epilepsy, a target animal safety study in
dogs was conducted [96]. Under laboratory conditions,
healthy Beagle dogs were exposed to high doses (up to
150 mg/kg q12h) of imepitoin for 6 months. Clinical
signs of toxicity were mild and infrequent and they were
mostly CNS (depression, transient ataxia) or gastrointes-
tinal system (vomiting, body weight loss, salivation) re-
lated. These clinical signs were not life-threatening and
generally resolved within 24h if symptomatic treatment
was given. These data indicate that imepitoin is a safe
AED and is well tolerated up to high doses in dogs
treated twice daily [96]. However, the safety of imepitoin
has not been evaluated in dogs weighing less than 5 kg
or in dogs with safety concerns such as renal, liver,
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176 Page 7 of 16

Fig. 2 Imepitoin treatment flow diagram for decision making during seizure management in an otherwise healthy dog. The authors advise to
start with imepitoin in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy experiencing recurrent single generalised epileptic seizures. *Criteria for (in)adequate seizure
control with regard to efficacy and tolerability (see Consensus proposal: Outcome of therapeutic interventions in canine and feline epilepsy [94]).
1. Treatment efficacious: a: Achievement of complete treatment success (i.e. seizure freedom or extension of the interseizure interval to three
times the longest pretreatment interseizure interval and for a minimum of three months (ideally > 1 year), b: Achievement of partial treatment
success (i.e. a reduction in seizure frequency including information on seizure incidence (usually at least 50 % or more reduction defines a drug
responder), a reduction in seizure severity, or a reduction in frequency of seizure clusters and/or status epilepticus). 2. Treatment not tolerated i.e.
appearance of severe adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the AED. #Currently there are no data available on which AED should be
added to imepitoin in case of inadequate seizure control. At this moment, the authors recommend the use of PB as adjunct AED in dogs
receiving the maximum dose of imepitoin and experiencing poor seizure control

cardiac, gastrointestinal or other disease. No idiosyncratic
reactions have been demonstrated so far. The routinely
measured liver enzymes’ activity do not appear to be in-
duced by imepitoin [96]. Compared with the traditional
benzodiazepines, such as diazepam, which acts as full ago-
nists at the benzodiazepine site of the GABAA receptor,
partial agonists such as imepitoin show less sedative ad-
verse effects and are not associated with tolerance and
dependence during long-term administration in animal
models [122]. Also in epileptic dogs, tolerance did not
develop and no withdrawal signs were observed after
treatment discontinuation [64].
Dose and monitoring (Fig. 2)
The oral dose range of imepitoin is 10−30 mg/kg BID.
The recommended oral starting dose of imepitoin is 10−20
mg/kg BID. If seizure control is not satisfactory after at
least 1 week of treatment at this dose and the medica-
tion is well tolerated, the dose can be increased up to a
maximum of 30 mg/kg BID. Reference range of plasma
or serum imepitoin concentrations is unknown and
there are no therapeutic monitoring recommendations
for imepitoin from the manufacturer. Pharmacokinetic
studies in dogs suggest variability in plasma imepitoin
concentrations among individuals and sampling times.
However, no correlation between plasma imepitoin con-
centration and seizure frequency reduction was identified
[64] therefore and because of its wide therapeutic index,
serum imepitoin monitoring is not needed.
The authors recommend a complete blood cell count
and biochemical profile before starting imepitoin treat-
ment and periodically every 6 months during treatment.
If the dog is in remission or has no seizures, a periodical
control every 12 months is advised.
Bromide
Efficacy
Br is usually administered as the potassium salt (KBr).
The sodium salt form (NaBr) contains more Br per gram
of compound, therefore, the dose should be approxi-
mately 15 % less than that calculated for KBr [124]. In
most EU countries, KBr is approved only for add-on
treatment in dogs with epilepsy drug-resistant to first-
line AED therapy. PB and KBr have a synergistic effect
and add-on treatment with KBr in epileptic dogs im-
proves seizure control in dogs that are poorly controlled
with PB alone [46, 93, 126]. A recent study showed that
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
KBr was less efficacious and tolerable than PB as first-
line drug [10]. According to Charalambous et al. (2014)
[17] there is fair level of evidence for recommending the
use of KBr as a monotherapy, but less as adjunct AED.
Pharmacokinetics
The bioavailability of Br after oral administration in nor-
mal dogs is approximately 46 %. The elimination half-life
is long and ranges from 25−46 days in dogs, consequently,
it can take several months (approximately 3 months) be-
fore steady-state concentrations after treatment initiation
at maintenance dose are reached [46, 67, 90, 125]. KBr is
unbound to plasma proteins and can diffuse freely across
cellular membranes. KBr is not metabolised in the liver
and is therefore a good alternative in dogs with hepatic
dysfunction. KBr is excreted unchanged in the urine and
undergoes tubular reabsorption in competition with chlor-
ide. Therefore, dietary factors affecting chloride levels can
alter serum KBr concentrations [123]. High (low) dietary
chloride concentrations increase (decrease) the excretion
of KBr and shorten (prolong) its half-life. Dogs adminis-
tered KBr should be maintained on a constant diet (and
chloride intake) to prevent fluctuations in serum KBr
concentrations, which could result in therapeutic fail-
ure or toxicity. If dietary changes are necessary they
should be made gradually (over at least 5 days) and
serum concentrations of KBr should be monitored fol-
lowing dietary changes, especially if the dog becomes
sedated or has unexpected seizures. On biochemistry
profiles serum chloride concentrations are often falsely
elevated (“pseudohyperchloraemia”) because the assays
cannot distinguish between chloride and Br ions [123].
Pharmacokinetic interactions and adverse effects
Pharmacokinetic interactions of KBr are limited as KBr
is not metabolized or protein-bound. The main interac-
tions are associated with alterations in the renal excretion
of KBr. As already mentioned, the rate of elimination of
KBr varies proportionally and inversely to chloride intake.
Loop diuretics such as furosemide may enhance KBr elim-
ination by blocking KBr reabsorption through renal tubu-
lar chloride channels. KBr should be avoided in dogs with
renal dysfunction to prevent toxicity secondary to reduced
renal elimination [80].
Common, dose-dependent adverse effects of KBr in
dogs include sedation, ataxia and pelvic limb weakness,
polydipsia/polyuria, and polyphagia with weight gain
[4, 25, 46, 124] (Table 1). These effects occur in the
initial weeks of treatment and may be magnified by
concurrent PB administration. These adverse effects
subside (partly or completely), once KBr steady-state
concentrations are reached [125]. Gastrointestinal
irritation and clinical signs can be prevented or
Page 8 of 16
minimized by administering Br with food and dividing
the daily dose into 2 or more doses [4].
Uncommon idiosyncratic reactions of KBr in dogs in-
clude personality changes (aggressive behaviour, irritabil-
ity, hyperactivity), persistent cough, increased risk of
pancreatitis and megaoesofagus [4, 46, 67, 106] (Table 1).
Kbr may cause skin problems (bromoderma) in humans
[106], but no reports exist currently in dogs. For an in-
depth review on the adverse effects of Br the reader is
referred to comprehensive book chapters [23, 32, 91].
Dose and monitoring (Fig. 3)
The recommended oral starting dose of KBr is 15 mg/
kg BID when used as an add-on drug. An oral dose of
20 mg/kg BID is advised when used as a monotherapy.
Because of the long elimination half-life, KBr can be ad-
ministered once daily (preferably in the evening), however,
twice daily dosing as well as administration with food can
help to prevent gastrointestinal mucosa irritation [123].
Twice daily dosing is also recommended if excessive sed-
ation is present. Therapeutic ranges have been reported as
approximately 1000 mg/l to 2000 mg/l when administered
in conjunction with PB and 2000mg/l to 3000mg/l when
administered alone [126]. Br has a long half-life, conse-
quently, reaching a steady-state serum concentration may
require several months (approximately 3 months). Due to
this long half-life, timing of blood sample collection rela-
tive to oral administration is not critical [123].
Baseline complete blood cell count, biochemical profile
(including cholesterol and triglycerides) should be per-
formed before starting KBr treatment and periodically
every 6 months during treatment. Serum KBr concen-
trations should be monitored 3 months after treatment
initiation (or dose change). In the long term, in dogs
with adequate seizure control, serum KBr concentra-
tions should be monitored every 6 months. If the dog is
in remission or has no seizures, a periodical control
every 12 months is advised.
A loading dose may be recommended to achieve steady-
state therapeutic concentrations more rapidly (e.g. in dogs
with frequent or severe seizures, or when PB must be rap-
idly discontinued because of life-threatening adverse ef-
fects). Different protocols have been reported. Oral loading
can be performed by administering KBr at a dose of 625
mg/kg given over 48h and divided into eight or more
doses. A more gradual loading can be accomplished giving
125 mg/kg/day divided in three to four daily administra-
tions for 5 consecutive days. Daily phone contact with the
owners is advised. Loading can be associated with adverse
effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, sedation, ataxia
and pelvic limb weakness, polydipsia, polyuria and poly-
phagia) and the dog should be hospitalized if loading takes
place over 48h (7,85). It is advised to stop loading when
serious adverse effects occur. Consider that dogs in which
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176 Page 9 of 16

Fig. 3 KBr adjunct treatment flow diagram for decision making during seizure management in an otherwise healthy dog. *Criteria for (in)adequate
seizure control with regard to efficacy and tolerability (see Consensus proposal: Outcome of therapeutic interventions in canine and feline epilepsy
[94]). 1. Treatment efficacious: a: Achievement of complete treatment success (i.e. seizure freedom or extension of the interseizure interval to three
times the longest pretreatment interseizure interval and for a minimum of three months (ideally > 1 year), b: Achievement of partial treatment success
(i.e. a reduction in seizure frequency including information on seizure incidence (usually at least 50 % or more reduction defines a drug responder), a
reduction in seizure severity, or a reduction in frequency of seizure clusters and/or status epilepticus). 2. Treatment not tolerated i.e. appearance of
severe adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the AED

KBr is used as adjunct AED to PB may be more prone to
adverse effects. In these cases, a PB dose decrease of 25 %
may be needed. Serum KBr levels should be monitored 1
month after loading.
Dose increases can be calculated according to the fol-
lowing formula
Formula B:
For concomitant PB and KBr treatment, the new main-
tenance dose can be calculated as follows:
discussed in the following section are approved for treat-
ment of dogs with epilepsy, thus, according to EU drug
laws, these drugs can only be used as adjunctive treat-
ment if monotherapy or polytherapy with the approved
treatments have failed. Furthermore, except for levetirac-
etam, none of the AEDs discussed in the following sec-
tion have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials
in epileptic dogs, so that the evidence for their efficacy is
very limited [17].

ð2000 mg=l ‐ actual serum KBr steady‐state concentrationÞ  0:02

¼ mg=kg=day added to existing dose
Formula C:
In case of monotherapy KBr, the new maintenance
dose can be calculated as follows:
ð2500 mg=l − actual serum KBr steady−state concentrationÞ
 0:02 ¼ mg=kg=day added to existing dose
Only PB and imepitoin are approved as first-line treat-
ment of canine epilepsy in the EU. In most EU coun-
tries, KBr is only approved as add-on treatment in dogs
resistant to first-line treatments. None of the drugs
Levetiracetam
So far, three studies evaluated the efficacy of levetirace-
tam as an adjunct to other AEDs [79, 114, 127]. In all
these studies, the majority of the dogs were treated suc-
cessfully by oral levetiracetam as adjunct AED. The use
of oral levetiracetam was evaluated in an open-label
study and a response rate of 57 % was reported in dogs
with drug resistant epilepsy [127]. In a recent random-
ized placebo-controlled study by Muñana et al. (2012)
[79], the use of levetiracetam was evaluated in dogs with
drug resistant epilepsy. A significant decrease in seizure
frequency was reported compared with baseline, however,
no difference was detected in seizure frequency when
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176 Page 10 of 16

levetiractam was compared with placebo. However, the di- Table 2 Most common reported adverse effects seen in dogs
vergence in group size and the small sample size (due to treated with levetiracetam, zonisamide, felbamate, topiramate,
the high dropout rate) may have contributed to this result. gabapentin, and pregabalin (rarely reported and/or idiosyncratic
Nevertheless, a trend towards a decrease in seizure fre- adverse effects are indicated in grey
quency and increase in responder rate during levetirace- AED Adverse effects in dogs
tam administration compared to placebo warrants further Levetiracetam Sedation
evaluation in a larger scale study. According to the study Ataxia
of Charalambous et al., (2014) [17], there is a fair evidence Decreased appetite or anorexia
for recommending the use of levetiracetam as an adjunct
Vomiting
AED. Recently, a retrospective study provided further evi-
Behavioural changes
dence that administering levetiracetam as an adjunct AED
is well tolerated, and suppresses epileptic seizures signifi- Zonisamide Sedation
cantly in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy [83]. The authors Ataxia
also confirmed that if seizure frequency increases, an extra Vomiting
AED may be beneficial and they added the possibility of Inappetence
administering levetiracetam as pulse treatment for cluster
seizures.
Levetiracetam possesses a favourable pharmacokinetic
profile in dogs with respect to its use as an add-on AED. Felbamate Keratoconjunctivitis sicca
It has rapid and complete absorption after oral adminis- Thrombocytopenia
tration, minimal protein binding, minimal hepatic metab- Lymphopenia and leucopenia
olism and is excreted mainly unchanged via the kidneys. Topiramate Sedation
In humans and dogs, renal clearance of levetiracetam is
Ataxia
progressively reduced in patients with increasing severity
Weight loss
of renal dysfunction [85], thus, dosage reduction should
be considered in patients with impaired renal function. As Gabapentin Sedation
levetiracetam has minimal hepatic metabolism [85], this Ataxia
drug represents a useful therapeutic option in animals Pregabalin Sedation
with known or suspected hepatic dysfunction. However, Ataxia
its short elimination half-life of 3−6 h necessitates fre-
Weakness
quent administration. The recommended oral mainten-
ance dose of levetiracetam in dogs is 20 mg/kg TID-QID.
The same dose can be administered parenterally in dogs may be advantageous when polytherapy is instituted.
(SC, IM, IV) when oral administration is not possible [86]. It selectively binds to a presynaptic protein (SVA2),
In a previous study [127] it was shown that some dogs de- whereby it seems to modulate the release of neuro-
velop a tolerance to levetiracetam when used chronically. transmitters [86]. As, in dogs there is no information
This phenomenon, the ‘honeymoon effect’, has been docu- available regarding a therapeutic range [79], the human
mented for other AEDs, e.g. zonisamide and levetiracetam target range of 12−46 μg/l can be used as guidance regard-
in dogs with epilepsy [127, 129]. Therefore, the introduc- ing effective concentrations.
tion of the pulse treatment protocol (an initial dose of 60 Studies in humans have shown that concomitant admin-
mg/kg orally or parenterally after a seizure occurs or pre- istration of AEDs that induce cytochrome P450 metabol-
ictal signs are recognized by the owner, followed by 20 ism such as PB, can alter the disposition of levetiracetam
mg/kg TID until seizures do not occur for 48h) was devel- [19]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that PB ad-
oped, in order to start treatment only in case of cluster ministration significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of
seizures when therapeutic levetiracetam concentrations levetiracetam in normal dogs [73]. Thus, levetiracetam
need to be reached rapidly. The results in the recent study oral dose may need to be increased or dosing time
by Packer et al., 2015 [83] supports this clinical approach. interval may need to be shortened when concurrently
Pulse treatment was, however, associated with more side administered with PB [73]. Also in dogs with epilepsy,
effects compared to maintenance levetiracetam therapy concurrent administration of PB alone or in combination
[83]. Levetiracetam is well tolerated and generally safe in with KBr increases levetiracetam clearance compared to
dogs. Except for mild sedation, ataxia, decreased appetite concurrent administration of KBr alone [78]. Thus, dosage
and vomiting adverse effects are very rarely described in increases might be indicated when utilizing levetiracetam
dogs [79, 127] (Table 2). Levetiracetam has also a different as add-on treatment with PB in dogs [78], preferably guided
mode of action compared to other AEDs and therefore by levetiracetam serum concentration measurement.
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
Zonisamide
There are few reports on the use of zonisamide in dogs,
despite it being licensed for treatment of canine epilepsy
in Japan. One report evaluated the efficacy of oral zonisa-
mide as a monotherapy [18]. Two studies have been de-
scribed evaluating zonisamide as an add-on treatment in
dogs with drug resistant epilepsy [28, 129]. Based on the
results of these studies, Charalambous et al. (2014) [17]
concluded that, at present, there is insufficient evidence to
recommend the use of zonisamide either as a monotherapy
or as an adjunct AED in dogs. Larger studies are required
to evaluate zonisamide as a monotherapy or as an adjunct-
ive AED in dogs. Adverse effects in dogs include sedation,
vomiting, ataxia, and loss of appetite [18, 28, 129] (Table 2).
Additionally, recently hepatotoxicity has been described in
2 dogs receiving zonisamide monotherapy which is be-
lieved to be an idiosyncratic reaction to the drug [69, 104]
(Table 2). Renal tubular acidosis has also been described in
a dog receiving zonisamide monotherapy [20] (Table 2).
Thus, zonisamide should be used with caution in dogs with
renal or hepatic impairment. Both, hepatic and renal fail-
ures have been described in humans receiving zonisamide
as well. Currently, zonisamide is not available in every
country and when available, it can be very expensive.
Zonisamide is a sulphonamide-based anticonvulsant
approved for use in humans. The exact mechanism of
action is unknown, however, blockage of calcium channels,
enhancement of GABA release, inhibition of glutamate
release, and inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels
might contribute to its anticonvulsant properties [61]. In
dogs, zonisamide is well-absorbed after oral administration,
has a relatively long elimination half-life (approximately
15h), and has low protein binding so that drug interactions
are minimized. The drug mainly undergoes hepatic metab-
olism via the cytochrome P450 system before excretion by
the kidneys [11].
The recommended oral starting dose of zonisamide in
dogs is 3−7 mg/kg BID and 7−10 mg/kg BID in dogs co-
administered hepatic microsomal enzymes inducers such
as PB [11, 28]. Serum concentrations of zonisamide
should be measured minimally 1 week after treatment
initiation or dosage adjustment to allow steady state con-
centrations be reached. Care should be taken to avoid
haemolysis, as falsely elevated serum zonisamide concen-
trations from lysed red blood cells may occur. The human
target range of 10−40 mg/l can be used as guidance re-
garding effective concentrations. [28]. Baseline complete
blood cell count and biochemical profile should be per-
formed before starting zonisamide treatment and period-
ically every 6 months during treatment.
Felbamate
One veterinary study evaluated the efficacy of felbamate
as an adjunct to PB in 6 dogs with focal idiopathic
Page 11 of 16
epilepsy [100]. According to Charalambous et al. (2014)
[17], the study demonstrated overall moderate/high risk
of bias. On this basis it was concluded that there is cur-
rently insufficient evidence to recommending the use of
felbamate as an add-on AED. Felbamate should be re-
served for dogs refractory to the other more thoroughly
investigated and safer AEDs in this species and as such
this is a 4th or 5th line option. In the clinical study by
Ruehlmann et al., (2001) [100] adverse effects noted in-
cluded keratoconjunctivitis sicca and mild blood dyscra-
sias (Table 2).
Felbamate is a dicarbamate AED released for use in
humans in 1993 for the control of focal seizures. Its
mechanism of action is multiple such as inhibition of
glycine-enhanced NMDA-induced intracellular calcium
currents [134], blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels
and inhibition of voltage –gated calcium currents [133].
In 1993, felbamate was marketed as a safe AED, which
lacked demonstrable toxic side effects and did not require
laboratory monitoring in humans. However, within a year
of its release it became evident that felbamate was associ-
ated with an unacceptable incidence of life-threatening
side effects [12], such as anorexia, weight loss, vomiting,
headache, irritability. Moreover, aplastic anemia and fatal
hepatotoxicity were also described [55, 134].
Pharmacokinetic interactions between felbamate and
other AEDs have been well described. E.g. felbamate
raises concurrent PB serum levels in a dose-dependent
manner [12], and the elimination of felbamate was noted
to be strikingly reduced when given with gabapentin
[50]. Felbamate is mainly metabolized by the liver [88]
and should therefore not be used in dogs with pre-
existing hepatic disease. Felbamate has an elimination
half-life of 5−7h.
The recommended oral starting dose in dogs is 20
mg/kg TID, increasing to 400−600mg/day every 1−2
weeks [1]. Haematologic evaluations and biochemistry
panels (esp. liver enzyme concentrations) should be per-
formed before felbamate therapy is initiated and during
therapy. This is especially important in animals receiving
concurrent PB. In humans, the signs of aplastic anaemia
and liver failure are usually seen during the first 6−12
months of therapy. In dogs, a minimum of monthly
blood tests should be performed for this period of time,
following-up every 6−12 months after this. Currently,
felbamate is not available in every country.
Topiramate
In 2013, one sudy evaluated the efficacy of topiramate as
an adjunct to PB, KBr, and levetiracetam in 10 dogs [57].
The dose was titrated (2−10 mg/kg) two to three times
daily. Sedation, ataxia and weight loss were the most
common adverse effects in dogs (Table 2). According to
Charalambous et al. (2014) [17], the study demontsrated
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
an overall moderate/high risk of bias. Thus, there is cur-
rently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of
topiramate as an adjunct AED [17].
In humans, topiramate has served both as a monother-
apy and adjunctive therapy to treat focal and generalised
seizures [29, 71]. It is a sulphamate-substituted mono-
saccharide that acts on multiple signalling mechanisms
enhancing GABA-ergic activity and inhibiting voltage-
sensitive sodium and calcium channels, kainate-evoked
currents and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes [118, 139].
From the available human data, topiramate is not metab-
olized extensively once absorbed, with 70−80 % of an ad-
ministered dose eliminated unchanged in the urine [65].
Topiramate has an elimination half-life of 2−4h. Clearance
of topiramate is reduced in patients with renal impairment,
necessitating dosage adjustments [37]. In dogs, topiramate
is not extensively metabolized and is primarily eliminated
unchanged in the urine. However, biliary excretion is
present following topiramate administration in dogs [15].
The drug has a relatively low potential for clinically relevant
interactions with other medications [8, 53]. The most com-
monly observed adverse effects in humans are somnolence,
dizziness, ataxia, vertigo and speech disorders [110]. No ad-
verse reactions were reported in healthy Beagle dogs ad-
ministered 10−150 mg/kg daily oral doses for 15 days [116].
Gabapentin
Two prospective studies evaluated the efficacy of oral
gabapentin as an adjunct to other AEDs, giving a combined
sample size of 28 dogs [44, 89]. According to Charalambous
et al. (2014) [17], one study demonstrated an overall mod-
erate/high risk of bias and the other one demonstrated an
overall high risk of bias. None of the studies demonstrated
an increased likelihood that the majority of the dogs were
treated successfully by oral administration of gabapentin.
Accordingly, there is currently overall insufficient evidence
for recommending the use of gabapentin as an adjunct
AED [17]. If used, the recommended oral dosage of gaba-
pentin in dogs is 10 to 20 mg/kg TID, although dose reduc-
tion may be necessary in patients with reduced renal
function [9]. Sedation and ataxia were the most common
side effects reported in dogs [44, 89] (Table 2).
Gabapentin has been approved in people in Europe
and by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
since 1993 for adjunctive treatment of focal seizures with
or without secondary generalisation and for the treatment
of post-herpetic neuralgia [9]. Its precise mechanism of
action is unclear, but is believed that much of its anticon-
vulsant effect is because of its binding to a specific modu-
latory protein of voltage-gated calcium channels, which
results in decreased release of excitatory neurotransmit-
ters [112]. In humans, gabapentin is entirely excreted by
the kidneys. In dogs, renal excretion occurs after a partial
hepatic metabolism. The elimination half-life is 3−4h.
Page 12 of 16
Although information in veterinary medicine is lim-
ited, pharmacokinetic interactions of gabapentin are un-
likely to occur as the drug has negligible protein binding
and does not induce hepatic cytochrome P450 family en-
zymes [95]. In humans, the elimination of felbamate was
noted to be significantly reduced when given with gaba-
pentin [50]. The most common adverse effects in humans
include dizziness, somnolence and fatigue [9]. These ef-
fects seem to be dose-dependent and resolve within the
first few weeks of treatment. No serious idiosyncratic reac-
tions or organ toxicities have been identified in humans or
animals [60].
Pregabalin
There is limited data on the use of pregabalin in dogs. In
a study by Dewey et al., (2009), the efficacy of oral preg-
abalin as an adjunct to PB and KBr was evaluated in 9
dogs [27]. According to Charalambous et al. (2014) [17],
this study demonstrated an overall moderate/high risk of
bias. Consequently, there is currently insufficient evi-
dence to recommend the use of pregabalin as an adjunct
AED [17]. If used, the recommended oral dose in dogs is
3−4 mg/kg BID-TID. The most common adverse effects
(Table 2) in the study of Dewey et al., (2009) included
sedation, ataxia and weakness, and to minimize these,
treatment could be initiated at a dose of 2 mg/kg two to
three times daily and escalated by 1 mg/kg each week
until the final dose is achieved [27]. As pregabalin clearance
is highly correlated with renal function, dose reduction is
necessary in patients with reduced renal function [5, 9].
Pregabalin is a GABA analogue that is structurally
similar to gabapentin. Pregabalin was approved in 2004
for the treatment of adults with peripheral neuropathic
pain and as adjunctive treatment for adults with focal
seizures with or without secondary generalization. Preg-
abalin is more potent than gabapentin owing to a greater
affinity for its receptor [112]. Pharmacokinetic studies
have been performed in dogs, with a reported elimin-
ation half-life of approximately 7 h [103]. In humans,
pregabalin does not bind to plasma proteins and is ex-
creted virtually unchanged by the kidneys [9]. Pregabalin
does not undergo hepatic metabolism and does not in-
duce or inhibit hepatic enzymes such as the cytochrome
P450 system [5]. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic
drug interactions have been identified in humans to
date. The most commonly reported adverse effects in
humans are dose-related and include dizziness, somno-
lence and ataxia [9].
Discontinuation of AEDs
Two main reasons for discontinuation of an AED are re-
mission of seizures or life-threatening adverse effects.
Generally, treatment for idiopathic epilepsy involves life-
long AED administration. However, remission has been
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
reported in dogs. Remission rates between 15−30 % have
been described in hospital based populations [6, 7, 47, 49].
In a study by Packer et al. (2014) 14 % of dogs were in re-
mission on PB [84]. When ≥50 % reduction in seizure fre-
quency was used as the outcome measure, success rates
were markedly higher with 64,5 % of dogs achieving this
level of seizure reduction. Several factors were associated
with an increased likelihood of achieving remission, namely:
being female, neutered, no previous experience of cluster
seizures and an older age at onset of seizures. The same
four factors were associated with an increased likelihood of
achieving a ≥50 % reduction in seizure frequency [84]. The
breed least likely to go into remission or have an ≥50 %
reduction in seizure frequency was the Border Collie (0
and 40 %, respectively), the German Shepherd (11 and
35 %, respectively) and Staffordshire Bull Terrier (0 and
57 %, respectively) [84]. In a study by Hülsmeyer et al.
(2010) the remission rate was 18 % in Border Collies
independent of disease severity [49]. The decision to
gradually taper the dose of an AED should be taken on
a case-by-case basis, but seizure freedom of at least 1−2
years is advised. In people with prolonged seizure re-
mission (generally 2 or more years), the decision to dis-
continue AED treatment is done on an individual basis
considering relative risks and benefits. Individuals with
the highest probability of remaining seizure-free are
those who had no structural brain lesion, a short dur-
ation of epilepsy, few seizures before pharmacological
control, and AED monotherapy [81, 109]. In dogs, how-
ever, little information on risk factors associated with
seizure relapse exist, thus the pet owner must be aware
that seizures may recur anytime during AED dose re-
duction of after discontinuation. To prevent withdrawal
seizures or status epilepticus it is advised to decrease
the dose with 20 % or less on a monthly basis.
In case of life-threatening adverse effects, instant ces-
sation of AED administration under 24h observation is
necessary. In these cases, loading with an alternative
AED should be initiated promptly in order to achieve
target serum concentrations before serum PB concentra-
tion decreases. Loading with KBr (see section on KBr) or
levetiracetam (see section on levetiracetam) is possible.
If hepatic function is normal, starting imepitoin or zoni-
samide at the recommended oral starting dose may be
another alternative.
Pet owner education
In order to promote a successful management of an epi-
leptic pet, owners need to be educated thoroughly on
[23, 32, 91]:
– The disease of their pet and the influence on their
daily life (considerations regarding e.g. leaving the
dog alone, what to do if travelling and leaving
Page 13 of 16
the dog in a kennel, fears of behavioural
comorbidities, …)
– The need for AED therapy and the understanding
that this often is a lifetime commitment
– The aim of AED therapy
– The importance of regular administration of AEDs
– The fact that dose adjustments should only be made
after consulting a veterinarian
– Potential adverse effects of AED therapy
– The importance of maintaining a detailed seizure
diary
– The importance of regular check-ups to monitor
AED blood concentrations as well as haematology/
serum biochemistry where appropriate
– The need for treatment modulation to achieve
optimal seizure control
– The possibility of occurrence of status epilepticus
and cluster seizures and the administration of
additional AEDs at home
– Costs involved
– The fact that drug interactions might occur when
combined with other AEDs or non-AEDs
– The understanding that abrupt drug withdrawal
might be detrimental
– The fact that diet (e.g salt content), diarrhoea and
vomiting may affect the absorption of AEDs. It
should be advised to keep the diet constant or to
make changes gradually and seek veterinary advice if
gastrointestinal signs occur.
Abbreviations
AED: Antiepileptic drug; PB: Phenobarbital; KBr: Potassium bromide;
Br: Bromide; IM: Intramuscular; IV: Intravenous; PO: Orally; SC: Subcutaneously;
SID: Once daily; BID: Twice daily; TID: Three times daily; QID: Four times daily.
Competing interests
Following reimbursements, fees and funding have been received by the
authors in the last three years and have been declared in the competing
interest section. WL, CR, RGF, HAV, KM, MP and JP have received fees for
acting as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim (WL, KM, MP: consultancy
during development and approval of imepitoin; CR: pain consultancy; RGF,
JP, HAV: consultancy pre and post launch of imepitoin). AT has been an
advisor for Boehringer Ingelheim. SFMB, HAV and AT have been responsible
principal investigator of several research studies concerning imepitoin
financed by Boehringer Ingelheim. SFMB, HAV, JP, HP, MB, CR and AF
received speaking fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. HP received consulting
and speaking fees and funding for a collaborative project from Eisai Co. LTD.
HAV received funding for a collaborative project from Desitin and Nestlé
Purina Research. AF and LDR received reimbursements from Boehringer
Ingelheim. LDR has received consulting and speaking fees from Vetoquinol.
MP has received consultant fees for Aratana. The other authors declared that
they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
SFMB chaired and LDR co-chaired the treatment working group (LDR, SFMB,
KM, JP, SVM, AT) and wrote the first draft of the consensus paper with the
help of LDR, KM, JP, SVM, AT and HAV. All authors read, critiqued, commented
and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ information
Co-chair of the medical treatment of canine epilepsy working group: Luisa De Risio.
Chair of IVETF: Holger A. Volk.
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all owners of epileptic pets and veterinary
colleagues who have inspired the group to create consensus statements.
The authors also would like to thank the research office for assessing the
manuscript according to the Royal Veterinary College’s code of good
research practice (Authorisation Number – CCS_ 01027). This study was not
financially supported by any organization or grant.
Author details
1
Department of Small Animal Medicine and Clinical Biology, Faculty of
Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820,
Belgium. 2Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, CB8
7UU Suffolk, United Kingdom. 3Department of Clinical Sciences, College of
Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1052 William Moore
Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. 4Vet Extra Neurology, Broadleys Veterinary
Hospital, Craig Leith Road, Stirling FK7 7LEStirlingshire, United Kingdom.
5
Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary
Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany. 6Department of
Veterinary and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,
University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 7Fernside Veterinary
Centre, 205 Shenley Road, Borehamwood, SG9 0TH Hertfordshire, United
Kingdom. 8Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximillians-University,
Veterinärstr. 13, 80539 Munich, Germany. 9University of Melbourne, 250
Princes Highway, Weibee 3015VIC, Australia. 10Department of Pharmacology,
Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover,
Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany. 11Department of Clinical Sciences
of Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 108, 3583 CM Utrecht,
The Netherlands. 12Section of Clinical & Comparative Neuropathology, Centre
for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Veterinärstr.
13, 80539 Munich, Germany. 13Clinical Unit of Internal Medicine Small
Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna,
Austria. 14University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, D426
Veterinary Medical Center, 1352 Boyd Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
15
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 501 DW Brooks Drive,
Athens, GA 30602, USA. 16Chicago Veterinary Neurology and Neurosurgery,
3123 N. Clybourn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60618, USA. 17Department of
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximillians-University,
Königinstr. 16, 80539 Munich, Germany. 18Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane,
Eashing, Godalming, GU7 2QQ Surrey, United Kingdom. 19School of
Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of
Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7TE Surrey, United Kingdom. 20Department of Clinical
Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield AL9 7TAHertfordshire,
UK.
Received: 4 June 2015 Accepted: 29 June 2015
References
1. Adusumalli VE, Gilchrist JR, Wichmann JK, Kucharczyk N, Sofia RD. Pharmacokinetics
of felbamate in pediatric and adult beagle dogs. Epilepsia. 1992;33:955–60.
2. Al-Tahan F, Frey HH. Absorption kinetics and bioavailability of phenobarbital
after oral administration to dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1985;8:205–7.
3. Alves L, Hülsmeyer V, Jaggy A, Fischer A, Leeb T, Drögemüller M.
Polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene in phenobarbital responsive and
resistant idiopathic epileptic Border Collies. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:484–9.
4. Baird-Heinz HE, Van Schoick AL, Pelsor FR, Ranivand L, Hungerford LL. A
systematic review of the safety of potassium bromide in dogs. J Am Vet
Med Assoc. 2012;240:705–15.
5. Ben-Menachem E. Pregabalin pharmacology and its relevance to clinical
practice. Epilepsia. 2004;45.
6. Berendt M, Gredal H, Ersbøll AK, Alving J. Premature death, risk factors, and
life patterns in dogs with epilepsy. J Vet Intern Med. 2007;21:754–9.
7. Berendt M, Gredal H, Pedersen LG, Alban L, Alving J. A cross-sectional study
of epilepsy in Danish Labrador Retrievers: prevalence and selected risk
factors. J Vet Intern Med. 2002;16:262–8.
8. Bialer M, Doose DR, Murthy B, Curtin C, Wang SS, Twyman RE, et al.
Pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate. Clin Pharmacokinet.
2004;43:763–80. Review.
9. Bockbrader HN, Wesche D, Miller R, Chapel S, Janiczek N, Burger P. Clin
Pharmacokinet. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics of pregabalin and gabapentin. 2010;49:661-9.
Page 14 of 16
10. Boothe DM, Dewey C, Carpenter DM. Comparison of phenobarbital with
bromide as a first-choice antiepileptic drug for treatment of epilepsy in
dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;240:1073–83.
11. Boothe DM, Perkins J. Disposition and safety of zonisamide after
intravenous and oral single dose and oral multiple dosing in normal hound
dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2008;31:544–53.
12. Bourgeois BF. Felbamate. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 1997;4:3–8.
13. Bunch SE, Castleman WL, Hornbuckle WE, Tennant BC. Hepatic cirrhosis
associated with long-term anticonvulsant drug therapy in dogs. J Am Vet
Med Assoc. 1982;181:357–62.
14. Cahan LD, Engel Jr J. Surgery for epilepsy: a review. Acta Neurol Scand.
1986;73:551–60.
15. Caldwell GW, Wu WN, Masucci JA, McKown LA, Gauthier D, Jones WJ, et al.
Metabolism and excretion of the antiepileptic/antimigraine drug,
Topiramate in animals and humans. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet.
2005;30:151–64.
16. Chadwick DW. The treatment of the first seizure: the benefits. Epilepsia.
2008;49:26–8.
17. Charalambous M, Brodbelt D, Volk HA. Treatment in canine epilepsy–a
systematic review. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:257.
18. Chung JY, Hwang CY, Chae JS, Ahn JO, Kim TH, Seo KW, et al. Zonisamide
monotherapy for idiopathic epilepsy in dogs. N Z Vet J. 2012;60:357–9.
19. Contin M1, Albani F, Riva R, Baruzzi A. Levetiracetam therapeutic monitoring
in patients with epilepsy: effect of concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Ther
Drug Monit. 2004;26:375–9.
20. Cook AK, Allen AK, Espinosa D, Barr J. Renal tubular acidosis associated with
zonisamide therapy in a dog. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:1454–7.
21. Daminet S, Ferguson DC. Influence of drugs on thyroid function in dogs. J
Vet Intern Med. 2003;17:463–72.
22. Dayrell-Hart B, Steinberg SA, VanWinkle TJ, Farnbach GC. Hepatotoxicity of
phenobarbital in dogs: 18 cases (1985-1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc.
1991;199:1060–6.
23. De Risio L. Chapter 12-20. In: De Risio L, Platt S, editors. Canine and feline
epilepsy. Diagnosis and Management. 2014. p. 347–475.
24. De Risio L, Freeman J, Shea A. Proceedings of the 27th Symposium of the
European College of Veterinary Neurology, Madrid, 18-20 September 2014,
and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2015; Prevalence and clinical
characteristics of idiopathic epilepsy in the Italian Spinone in the UK.
25. Dewey CW. Anticonvulsant therapy in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am
Small Anim Pract. 2006;36:1107–27.
26. Dewey CW, Barone G, Smith K, Kortz GD. Alternative anticonvulsant drugs
for dogs with seizure disorders. Vet Med. 2004;99:786–93.
27. Dewey CW, Cerda-Gonzalez S, Levine JM, Badgley BL, Ducoté JM, Silver GM,
et al. Pregabalin as an adjunct to phenobarbital, potassium bromide, or a
combination of phenobarbital and potassium bromide for treatment of
dogs with suspected idiopathic epilepsy. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009;235:1442–9.
28. Dewey CW, Guiliano R, Boothe DM, Berg JM, Kortz GD, Joseph RJ, et al.
Zonisamide therapy for refractory idiopathic epilepsy in dogs. J Am Anim
Hosp Assoc. 2004;40:285–91.
29. Elterman RD, Glauser TA, Wyllie E, Reife R, Wu SC, Pledger G. A double-blind,
randomized trial of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures
in children. Topiramate YP Study Group. Neurology. 1999;52:1338–44.
30. European Medicines agency http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/
index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/veterinary/medicines/002543/
vet_med_000268.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058008d7a8 http://www.ema.europa.eu/
docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/veterinary/
002543/WC500140840.pdf
31. Farnbach GC. Serum concentrations and efficacy of phenytoin,
phenobarbital, and primidone in canine epilepsy. J Am Vet Med Assoc.
1984;184:1117–20.
32. Fischer A, Jurina K, Potschka H, Rentmeister K, Tipold A, Volk HA, et al.
Hoofdstuk 4: Therapie. In: Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, editor. Idiopathische
epilepsie bij de hond. 2013. p. 69–115.
33. Forrester SD, Wilcke JR, Jacobson JD, Dyer KR. Effects of a 44-day administra-
tion of phenobarbital on disposition of clorazepate in dogs. Am J Vet Res.
1993;54:1136–8.
34. Freitag H, Tuxhorn I. Cognitive function in preschool children after epilepsy
surgery: rationale for early intervention. Epilepsia. 2005;46:561–7.
35. Frey HH. Use of anticonvulsants in small animals. Vet Rec. 1986;118:484–6.
36. Frey HH, Göbel W, Löscher W. Pharmacokinetics of primidone and its active
metabolites in the dog. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1979;242:14–30.
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
37. Garnett WR. Clinical pharmacology of topiramate: a review. Epilepsia.
2000;41:61–5.
38. Gaskill CL, Cribb AE. Pancreatitis associated with potassium bromide/
phenobarbital combination therapy in epileptic dogs. Can Vet J. 2000;41:555–8.
39. Gaskill CL, Miller LM, Mattoon JS, Hoffmann WE, Burton SA, Gelens HC, et al.
Liver histopathology and liver and serum alanine aminotransferase and
alkaline phosphatase activities in epileptic dogs receiving phenobarbital. Vet
Pathol. 2005;42:147–60.
40. Gieger TL, Hosgood G, Taboada J, Wolfsheimer KJ, Mueller PB. Thyroid
function and serum hepatic enzyme activity in dogs after phenobarbital
administration. J Vet Intern Med. 2000;14:277–81.
41. Gieger TL, Hosgood G, Taboada J, Wolfsheimer KJ, Mueller PB. Thyroid
function and serum hepatic enzyme activity in dogs after phenobarbital
administration. J Vet Intern Med. 2000;14:277–81.
42. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro
C, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic
drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures
and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1094–120.
43. Glauser TA, Loddenkemper T. Management of childhood epilepsy. Epilepsy.
2013;19:568.
44. Govendir M, Perkins M, Malik R. Improving seizure control in dogs with
refractory epilepsy using gabapentin as an adjunctive agent. Aust Vet J.
2005;83:602–8.
45. Gulløv CH, Toft N, Berendt M. A Longitudinal Study of Survival in Belgian
Shepherds with Genetic Epilepsy. J Vet Int Med. 2012;26:1115–20.
46. Hess RS, Kass PH, Shofer FS, Van Winkle TJ, Washabau RJ. Evaluation of risk
factors for fatal acute pancreatitis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc.
1999;214:46–51.
47. Heynold Y, Faissler D, Steffen F, Jaggy A. Clinical, epidemiological and
treatment results of idiopathic epilepsy in 54 labrador retrievers: a long-term
study. J Small Anim Pract. 1997;38:7–14.
48. Hojo T, Ohno R, Shimoda M, Kokue E. Enzyme and plasma protein
induction by multiple oral administrations of phenobarbital at a therapeutic
dosage regimen in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2002;25:121–7.
49. Hülsmeyer V, Zimmermann R, Brauer C, Sauter-Louis C, Fischer A. Epilepsy in
Border Collies: clinical manifestation, outcome, and mode of inheritance. J
Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:171–8.
50. Hussein G, Troupin AS, Montouris G. Gabapentin interaction with felbamate.
Neurology. 1996;47:1106.
51. Jacobs G, Calvert C, Kaufman A. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in
three dogs treated with anticonvulsants. J Am Vet Med Assoc.
1998;212:681–4.
52. Janszky J, Janszky I, Schulz R, Hoppe M, Behne F, Pannek HW, et al.
Temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis: predictors for long-term
surgical outcome. Brain. 2005;128:395–404.
53. Johannessen SI. Pharmacokinetics and interaction profile of topiramate:
review and comparison with other newer antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia.
1997;38:18–23.
54. Jull P, Risio LD, Horton C, Volk HA. Effect of prolonged status epilepticus as
a result of intoxication on epileptogenesis in a UK canine population. Vet
Rec. 2011;169:361.
55. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Anderson T, Harmon DC, Shapiro S. Evaluation of
case reports of aplastic anemia among patients treated with felbamate.
Epilepsia. 1997;38:1265–9.
56. Khoutorsky A, Bruchim Y. Transient leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and
anaemia associated with severe acute phenobarbital intoxication in a dog. J
Small Anim Pract. 2008;49:367–9.
57. Kiviranta AM, Laitinen-Vapaavuori O, Hielm-Björkman A, Jokinen T. Topiramate
as an add-on antiepileptic drug in treating refractory canine idiopathic
epilepsy. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54:512–20.
58. Kube SA, Vernau KM, LeCouteur RA. Dyskinesia associated with oral
phenobarbital administration in a dog. J Vet Intern Med. 2006;20:1238–40.
59. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med.
2000;342:314–9.
60. La Roche SM, Helmers SL. The new antiepileptic drugs: scientific review.
JAMA. 2004;291:605–14.
61. Leppik IE. Zonisamide: chemistry, mechanism of action, and
pharmacokinetics. Seizure. 2004;13:5–9.
62. Levitski RE, Trepanier öA. . Effect of timing of blood collection on serum
phenobarbital concentrations in dogs with epilepsy. J Am Vet Med Assoc.
2000;15(217):200–4.
Page 15 of 16
63. Löscher W, Potschka H, Rieck S, Tipold A, Rundfeldt C. Anticonvulsant
efficacy of the low-affinity partial benzodiazepine receptor agonist ELB 138
in a dog seizure model and in epileptic dogs with spontaneously recurrent
seizures. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1228–39.
64. Löscher W, Potschka H, Rieck S, Tipold A, Rundfeldt C. Anticonvulsant
efficacy of the low-affinity partial benzodiazepine receptor agonist ELB 138
in a dog seizure model and in epileptic dogs with spontaneously recurrent
seizures. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1228–39.
65. Lyseng-Williamson KA, Yang LP. Topiramate: a review of its use in the
treatment of epilepsy. Drugs. 2007;67:2231–56.
66. March PA, Hillier A, Weisbrode SE, Mattoon JS, Johnson SE, DiBartola SP, et
al. Superficial necrolytic dermatitis in 11 dogs with a history of
phenobarbital administration (1995-2002). J Vet Intern Med. 2004;18:65–74.
67. March PA, Podell M, Sams RA. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of bromide
following high-dose oral potassium bromide administration in healthy
Beagles. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2002;25:425–32.
68. Martinez SE, Bowen KA, Remsberg CM, Takemoto JK, Wright HM, Chen-Allen
AV, et al. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of lacosamide
in canine serum using ultraviolet detection: application to pre-clinical
pharmacokinetics in dogs. Biomed Chromatogr. 2012;26:606–9.
69. Miller ML, Center SA, Randolph JF, Lepherd ML, Cautela MA, Dewey CW.
Apparent acute idiosyncratic hepatic necrosis associated with zonisamide
administration in a dog. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:1156–60.
70. Monteiro R, Anderson TJ, Innocent G, Evans NP, Penderis J. Variations in
serum concentration of phenobarbitone in dogs receiving regular twice
daily doses in relation to the times of administration. Vet Rec.
2009;165:556–8.
71. Montouris GD, Biton V, Rosenfeld WE. Nonfocal generalized tonic-clonic
seizures: response during long-term topiramate treatment. Topiramate YTC/
YTCE Study Group. Epilepsia. 2000;41:77–81.
72. Moore SA, Muñana KR, Papich MG, Nettifee-Osborne JA. The pharmacokinetics
of levetiracetam in healthy dogs concurrently receiving phenobarbital. J Vet
Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:31–4.
73. Moore SA, Muñana KR, Papich MG, Nettifee-Osborne JA. The pharmacokinetics
of levetiracetam in healthy dogs concurrently receiving phenobarbital. J Vet
Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:31–4.
74. Morton DJ, Honhold N. Effectiveness of a therapeutic drug monitoring
service as an aid to the control of canine seizures. Vet Rec.
1988;9(122):346–9.
75. Müller PB, Taboada J, Hosgood G, Partington BP, VanSteenhouse JL, Taylor
HW, et al. Effects of long-term phenobarbital treatment on the liver in dogs.
J Vet Intern Med. 2000;14:165–71.
76. Muñana KR. Update: seizure management in small animal practice. Vet Clin
North Am Small Anim Pract. 2013;43:1127–47.
77. Muñana KR, Nettifee-Osborne JA, Bergman Jr RL, Mealey KL. Association
between ABCB1 genotype and seizure outcome in Collies with epilepsy. J
Vet Intern Med. 2012;26:1358–64.
78. Muñana KR, Nettifee-Osborne JA, Papich MG. Effect of chronic administration
of phenobarbital, or bromide, on pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in dogs
with epilepsy. J Vet Intern Med. 2015. In press.
79. Muñana KR, Thomas WB, Inzana KD, Nettifee-Osborne JA, McLucas KJ, Olby
NJ, et al. Evaluation of levetiracetam as adjunctive treatment for refractory
canine epilepsy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Vet
Intern Med. 2012;26:341–8.
80. Nichols ES, Trepanier LA, Linn K. Bromide toxicosis secondary to renal
insufficiency in an epileptic dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996;208:231–3.
81. O'Dell C, Shinnar S. Initiation and discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs.
Neurol Clin. 2001;19:289–311.
82. Orito K, Saito M, Fukunaga K, Matsuo E, Takikawa S, Muto M, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of zonisamide and drug interaction with phenobarbital in
dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2008;31:259–64.
83. Packer RMA, Nye G, Porter SE, Vok HA. Assessment into the usage of
levetiracetam in a canine epilepsy clinic. BMC Vet Res. 2015. In press.
84. Packer RM, Shihab NK, Torres BB, Volk HA. Clinical risk factors associated
with anti-epileptic drug responsiveness in canine epilepsy.
PLoS One. 2014;25:9.
85. Patsalos PN. Clinical pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam. Clin Pharmacokinet.
2004;43:707–24.
86. Patterson EE, Goel V, Cloyd JC, O'Brien TD, Fisher JE, Dunn AW, et al.
Intramuscular, intravenous and oral levetiracetam in dogs: safety and
pharmacokinetics. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2008;31:253–8.
Bhatti et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2015) 11:176
87. Pedersoli WM, Wike JS, Ravis WR. Pharmacokinetics of single doses of
phenobarbital given intravenously and orally to dogs. Am J Vet Res.
1987;48:679–83.
88. Pellock JM, Faught E, Leppik IE, Shinnar S, Zupanc ML. Felbamate:
consensus of current clinical experience. Epilepsy Res. 2006;71:89–101.
89. Platt SR, Adams V, Garosi LS, Abramson CJ, Penderis J, De Stefani A, et al.
Treatment with gabapentin of 11 dogs with refractory idiopathic epilepsy.
Vet Rec. 2006;59:881–4.
90. Podell M. Antiepileptic drug therapy. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 1998;13:185–92.
91. Podell M. Chapter 7. In: Platt S, Olby N, editors. BSAVA Manual of Canine
and Feline Neurology. 3rd ed. 2010. p. 97–112.
92. Podell M. Antiepileptic drug therapy and monitoring. Top Companion Anim
Med. 2013;28:59–66.
93. Podell M, Fenner WR. Bromide therapy in refractory canine idiopathic
epilepsy. J Vet Intern Med. 1993;7:318–27.
94. Potschka H, Fischer A, Löscher W, Patterson EE, Bhatti SFM, Berendt M, De
Risio L, Farquhar RG, Long S, Mandigers PJJ, Matiasek K, Muñana K, Pakozdy
A, Penderis J, Platt S, Podell M, Pumarola MB, Rusbridge C, Stein VM, Tipold
A, Volk HA21. International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force Consensus
Proposal: Outcome of therapeutic interventions in canine and feline
epilepsy. BMC Vet Res; 2015.
95. Radulovic LL, Türck D, von Hodenberg A, Vollmer KO, McNally WP, DeHart
PD, et al. Disposition of gabapentin (neurontin) in mice, rats, dogs, and
monkeys. Drug Metab Dispos. 1995;23:441–8.
96. Ravis WR, Nachreiner RF, Pedersoli WM, Houghton NS. Pharmacokinetics of
phenobarbital in dogs after multiple oral administration. Am J Vet Res.
1984;45:1283–6.
97. Ravis WR, Pedersoli WM, Wike JS. Pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital in
dogs given multiple doses. Am J Vet Res. 1989;50:1343–7.
98. Rieck S, Rundfeldt C, Tipold A. Anticonvulsant activity and tolerance of
ELB138 in dogs with epilepsy: a clinical pilot study. Vet J. 2006;172:86–95.
99. Rogawski MA, Johnson MR. Intrinsic severity as a determinant of
antiepileptic drug refractoriness. Epilepsy Curr. 2008;8:127–30.
100. Ruehlmann D, Podell M, March P. Treatment of partial seizures and seizure-like
activity with felbamate in six dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2001;42:403–8.
101. Rundfeldt C, Gasparic A, Wlaź P. Imepitoin as novel treatment option for
canine idiopathic epilepsy: pharmacokinetics, distribution, and metabolism
in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2014;37:421–34.
102. Rundfeldt C, Löscher W. The pharmacology of imepitoin: the first partial
benzodiazepine receptor agonist developed for the treatment of epilepsy.
CNS Drugs. 2014;28:29–43.
103. Salazar V, Dewey CW, Schwark W, Badgley BL, Gleed RD, Horne W, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of single-dose oral pregabalin administration in normal
dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009;36:574–80.
104. Schwartz M, Muñana KR, Olby NJ. Possible drug-induced hepatopathy in a
dog receiving zonisamide monotherapy for treatment of cryptogenic
epilepsy. J Vet Med Sci. 2011;73:1505–8.
105. Schwartz-Porsche D, Löscher W, Frey HH. Therapeutic efficacy of
phenobarbital and primidone in canine epilepsy: a comparison. J Vet
Pharmacol Ther. 1985;8:113–9.
106. Scola N, Kaczmarczyk J, Möllenhoff K. Infantile bromoderma due to
antiepileptic therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:131–2.
107. Shaik IH, Mehvar R. Cytochrome P450 induction by phenobarbital
exacerbates warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat livers. Free
Radic Res. 2010;44:441–53.
108. Shih JJ, Ochoa JG. A systematic review of antiepileptic drug initiation and
withdrawal. Neurologist. 2009;15:122–31.
109. Shih JJ, Ochoa JG. A systematic review of antiepileptic drug initiation and
withdrawal. Neurologist. 2009;15:122–31.
110. Shorvon SD. Safety of topiramate: adverse events and relationships to
dosing. Epilepsia. 1996;37:18–S22.
111. Shorvon S, Luciano AL. Prognosis of chronic and newly diagnosed epilepsy:
revisiting temporal aspects. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:208–12.
112. Sills GJ. The mechanisms of action of gabapentin and pregabalin. Curr Opin
Pharmacol. 2006;6:108–13.
113. Speciale J, Dayrell-Hart B, Steinberg SA. Clinical evaluation of c-vinyl-c-aminobutyric
acid for control of epilepsy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991;198:995–1000.
114. Steinberg MFD. Levetiracetam therapy for long-term idiopathic epileptic
dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2004;18:410.
115. Stephen LJ, Brodie MJ. Selection of antiepileptic drugs in adults. Neurologic
Clinics. 2009;27:967–92.
Page 16 of 16
116. Streeter AJ, Stahle PL, Holland ML, Pritchard JF, Takacs AR. Pharmacokinetics
and bioavailability of topiramate in the beagle dog. Drug Metab Dispos.
1995;23:90–3.
117. Sutula TP, Hagen J, Pitkänen A. Do epileptic seizures damage the brain?
Curr Opin Neurol. 2003;16:189–95.
118. Taverna M, Nguyet TT, Valentin C, Level O, Merry T, Kolbe HV, et al. A multi-mode
chromatographic method for the comparison of the N-glycosylation of a
recombinant HIV envelope glycoprotein (gp160s-MN/LAI) purified by two
different processes. J Biotechnol. 1999;68:37–48.
119. Thomas WB. Seizures and narcolepsy. In: Dewey CW, editor. A practical
guide to canine and feline neurology. Ames (IA): Iowa State Press (Blackwell
Publishing); 2003. p. 193–212.
120. Thomas WB. Idiopathic epilepsy in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small
Anim Pract. 2010;40:161–79.
121. Thurman GD, McFadyen ML, Miller R. The pharmacokinetics of
phenobarbitone in fasting and non-fasting dogs. J S Afr Vet Assoc.
1990;61:86–9.
122. Tipold A, Keefe TJ, Löscher W, Rundfeldt C, de Vries F. Clinical efficacy and
safety of imepitoin in comparison with phenobarbital for the control of
idiopathic epilepsy in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2015;38:160–8.
123. Trepanier LA. Use of bromide as an anticonvulsant for dogs with epilepsy. J
Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995;207:163–6.
124. Trepanier LA, Babish JG. Effect of dietary chloride content on the
elimination of bromide by dogs. Res Vet Sci. 1995;58:252–5.
125. Trepanier LA, Babish JG. Pharmacokinetic properties of bromide in dogs
after the intravenous and oral administration of single doses. Res Vet Sci.
1995;58:248–51.
126. Trepanier LA, Van Schoick A, Schwark WS, Carrillo J. Therapeutic serum drug
concentrations in epileptic dogs treated with potassium bromide alone or
in combination with other anticonvulsants: 122 cases (1992-1996). J Am Vet
Med Assoc. 1998;213:1449–53.
127. Volk HA, Matiasek LA, Luján Feliu-Pascual A, Platt SR, Chandler KE. The
efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in pharmacoresistant epileptic
dogs. Vet J. 2008;176:310–9.
128. von Klopmann T, Boettcher IC, Rotermund A, Rohn K, Tipold A. Euthyroid
sick syndrome in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy before treatment with
anticonvulsant drugs. J Vet Intern Med. 2006;20:516–22.
129. von Klopmann T, Rambeck B, Tipold A. Prospective study of zonisamide
therapy for refractory idiopathic epilepsy in dogs. J Small Anim Pract.
2007;48:134–8.
130. Wagner SO, Sams RA, Podell M. Chronic phenobarbital therapy reduces
plasma benzodiazepine concentrations after intravenous and rectal
administration of diazepam in the dog. J Vet Pharmacol Ther.
1998;21:335–41.
131. Weiss KL, Schroeder CE, Kastin SJ, Gibson JP, Yarrington JT, Heydorn WE, et
al. MRI monitoring of vigabatrin-induced intramyelinic edema in dogs. Neur-
ology. 1994;44:1944–9.
132. Weissl J, Hülsmeyer V, Brauer C, Tipold A, Koskinen LL, Kyöstilä K, et al.
Disease progression and treatment response of idiopathic epilepsy in
Australian Shepherd dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2012;26:116–25.
133. White HS. Comparative anticonvulsant and mechanistic profile of the
established and newer antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia. 1999;40.
134. White HS, Harmsworth WL, Sofia RD, Wolf HH. Felbamate modulates the
strychnine-insensitive glycine receptor. Epilepsy Res. 1995;20:41–8.
135. Wilensky AJ, Friel PN, Levy RH, Comfort CP, Kaluzny SP. Kinetics of
phenobarbital in normal subjects and epileptic patients. Eur J Clin
Pharmacol. 1982;23:87–92.
136. Wong IC, Lhatoo SD. Adverse reactions to new anticonvulsant drugs. Drug
Saf. 2000;23:35–56.
137. Wright HM, Chen AV, Martinez SE, Davies NM. Pharmacokinetics of oral
rufinamide in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:529–33.
138. Yarrington JT, Gibson JP, Dillberger JE, Hurst G, Lippert B, Sussman NM, et
al. Sequential neuropathology of dogs treated with vigabatrin, a
GABA-transaminase inhibitor. Toxicol Pathol. 1993;21:480–9.
139. Zhang X, Velumian AA, Jones OT, Carlen PL. Modulation of
high-voltage-activated calcium channels in dentate granule cells by
topiramate. Epilepsia. 2000;41.