At the Matrimonial/IAS Part

of New York State Supreme Court at

the Courthouse,
County, on _ _.

Present:
Hon. Justice/Referee
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- X
CESAR E. DELOSSANTOS
Index No.: 3216/2018
Plaintiff, Calendar No

-against-
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Defendant.
JADEL G. DELOSSANTOS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- X

The issues of this action having been submitted to this Court at Part hereof, held in
and for the County of Queens _________ , and having considered the allegations and proofs
of the respective parties, and due deliberation having been had thereon.

NOW, after reading and considering the papers submitted, I do hereby make the following
findings of essential facts which I deem established by the evidence and reach the following conclusions of
law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

FIRST: Plaintiff and Defendant were both eighteen (18) years of age or over when
this action was commenced.

SECOND: The Plaintiff has resided in New York State for a continuous period of at
least two years immediately preceding the commencement of this divorce action.

THIRD: The Plaintiff and the Defendant were married on 07/24/2014 in The Office of
the City Clerk, Brooklyn, NY; in a civil ceremony.
FOURTH: That no decree, judgment or order of divorce, annulment or dissolution of marriage has
been granted to either party against the other in any Court of competent jurisdiction of this state or
any other state, territory or country, and that there is no other action pending for divorce by either
party against the other in any Court.

FIFTH: That this action was commenced by filing the Summons with Notice with the County Clerk
on 04/20/2018. Defendant was served personally with the above stated pleadings and the Notice of
Automatic Orders. Defendant appeared and waived her right to answer.

SIXTH: That Defendant is not in the military service of the United States of America, the State
of New York, or any other state. Defendant has appeared by affidavit and does not oppose the
action.

SEVENTH: The grounds for divorce that are alleged in the Verified Complaint were proved as
follows:

EIGHTH: Irretrievable breakdown in relationship for at least Six Months DRL §170(7).

That the relationship between Plaintiff and Defendant has broken down irretrievably for a period
of at least six months.

NINTH: A sworn statement as to the removal of barriers to remarriage is not required because the
parties were married in a civil ceremony.

TENTH: Equitable Distribution is not an issue.

The Court has informed the unrepresented party or parties of the maintenance guideline obligation
pursuant to DRL § 236(B)(6) enacted by Laws of 2015, ch.269; S 5658/A 7636-b] (the
“Maintenance Guidelines Law”) .

No maintenance was awarded because: Neither party seeks maintenance.

ELEVENTH: The Plaintiff’s address is: 175 Schaefer St #1 Brooklyn NY 11207, and social
security number is: 088-74-4803. The Defendant’s address is: 29-41 Ginmose St East Elmhurst,
NY 11369, and social security number is: None.
TWELFTH: Defendant may resume use of her prior surname: Alejo.

THIRTEENTH: Compliance with DRL § 255 (1) and (2) has been satisfied as follows:

the parties entered into an addendum to the stipulation of settlement/agreement which

complies with the requirements of DRL § 255 (2).

FOURTEENTH: The Judgment of Divorce incorporates all ancillary issues, including the
payment of counsel and experts' fees and expenses, which issues:

❏ are not to be incorporated into the Judgment of Divorce, in that neither party to the divorce

has contested any such issues based on the Affidavit of Plaintiff (which Defendant has
not contested

FIFTEENTH: Health care expenses not covered by insurance shall be paid by Plaintiff.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FIRST: Residency as required by DRL § 230 has been satisfied.

SECOND: The requirements of DRL § 255 have been satisfied.

THIRD: The requirements of DRL § 236(B)(2)(b) have been satisfied.

FOURTH: All economic issues of equitable distribution of marital property have been resolved
by the parties or determined by the court and incorporated into the judgment of divorce.
FIFTH: The parties are entitled to a judgment of divorce on the ground of DRL §170 subd 7
and granting the incidental relief awarded.

SIXTH: Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment of divorce on the ground of DRL §170 subd 7
and granting the incidental relief awarded.

Dated:

J.S.C./Referee

(Form UD-10 - Rev. 1/25/16)

 At the Matrimonial/IAS Part
of New York State Supreme Court at
the Courthouse,
County, on .
Present:
Hon. Justice/Referee
------------------------------------------------------------------ X
CESAR E. DELOSSANTOS
Index No. 3216/2018
Plaintiff, Calendar No.:
-against- Social Security No.: 088-74-4803

JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE
Defendant.

JADEL G. DELOSSANTOS
------------------------------------------------------------------ X

This action was submitted to this court for consideration this _____ day of ________.
The Defendant was served personally within the State of New York.
Plaintiff presented a Summons With Notice and Affidavit of Plaintiff constituting the facts of the
matter. The Defendant has appeared and waived her right to answer. The Court accepted written
proof of non-military status.

The Plaintiff’s address is: 175 Schaefer St #1 Brooklyn NY 11207,

and social security number is: 088-74-4803.

The Defendant’s address is: 175 Schaefer St #1 Brooklyn NY 11207,

and social security number is: None.

There are no minor children of the marriage.

Now on motion of “PLAINTIFF», the Plaintiff, it is:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Referee’s Report, if any, is hereby confirmed; and it is

Further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the application of Plaintiff is hereby granted to

dissolve the marriage between CESAR E. DELOSSANTOS, Plaintiff, and JADEL G.

DELOSSANTOS, Defendant, by reason of: the relationship between Plaintiff and Defendant has

broken down irretrievably for a period of at least six months pursuant to D.R.L §170(7); and

The requirements of D.R.L. §240 1(a-1) have been met and the Court having considered the

results of said inquiries, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED There are no orders from other courts to be continued; and it
is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that both parties are authorized to resume the use of any
prior surname, and it is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant is authorized to resume use of the prior
surname: Alejo, and it is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that there is no request for maintenance; and it is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant shall be served with a copy of this judgment,
with notice of entry, by the Plaintiff, within days of such entry.

Dated:
ENTER:

J.S.C./Referee

(Form UD-11 - Rev. 1/25/16)