Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ISSN: 2455-5703
Abstract
Image fusion is process of combining two different images of same scene which are multi focused by nature. It has the major
application in the field of visual sensor network for efficient surveillance monitoring. The thesis presents a novel hybrid image
fusion technique that has the capabilities to be used in the real time environment such as central computer of visual sensor network
for efficient surveillance purpose. A high resolution panchromatic image gives geometric details of an image because of the
presence of natural as well as manmade objects in the scene and a low resolution multispectral image gives the color information
of the source image. The aim of multisensor image fusion is to represent the visual information from multiple images having
different geometric representations into a single resultant image without any information loss. The advantages of image fusion
include image sharpening, feature enhancement, improved classification, and creation of stereo data sets. Multisensor image fusion
provides the benefits in terms of range of operation, spatial and temporal characteristics, system performance, reduced ambiguity
and improved reliability. Based on the processing levels, image fusion techniques can be divided into different categories. These
are pixel level, feature level and symbol level/decision level. Pixel level method is the simplest and widely used method. This
method processes pixels in the source image and retains most of the original image information. Compared to other two methods
pixel level image fusion gives more accurate results. Feature level method processes the characteristics of the source image. This
method can be used with the decision level method to fuse images effectively. Because of the reduced data size, it is easier to
compress and transmit the data. The top level of image fusion is decision making level. It uses the data information extracted from
the pixel level fusion or the feature level fusion to make optimal decision to achieve a specific objective. Moreover, it reduces the
redundancy and uncertain information.
Keywords- Image Fusion, Comparative Analysis, Quantitative Analysis, Computational Analysis etc
I. INTRODUCTION
Generally two sorts of vision are described. They are human vision and PC vision. Human vision is refined system that resources
and follows up on visual updates. It has progressed for a long time, essentially for obstruction or survival. Basic PC vision structure
requires a camera, a camera interface and a PC.
Image combination is the way toward consolidating at least two or more than two pictures into the single picture to
upgrade the data content. Picture combination systems are significantly utilized in applications remote detecting, military,
stargazing and therapeutic imaging. Picture blend systems are noteworthy as it improves the introduction of article affirmation
structures by fusing various wellsprings of satellite, airborne and ground based imaging structures with other related instructive
files.
A. Quantitative Analysis
The experimental testing is performed on overall all the multi-focus images of the database. But here in the thesis, the results are
presented on the limited dataset. The Table 1 and Figure 1 comparatively analyses the result of proposed method with other standard
methods on the basis of quantitative results. On comparing the results in the Table 1, it is observed that the bold values of the
proposed method shows the best results in terms of quantitative analysis. The overall image quality of the proposed method results
is also far better than all other methods.
Table 1: Analysed using graphically for more better and easy understanding and analysis
Methods SD CC API AG He MI QAB/F
Averaging 50.115 0.9131 96.012 3.686 4.265 3.125 0.798
DWT (1-level) 50.302 0.9254 98.066 4.598 4.258 5.125 0.888
DWT (3-level) 50.412 0.9472 97.118 3.265 4.569 4.989 0.799
SWT 51.052 0.9451 98.012 4.235 4.111 4.119 0.826
PCA 51.312 0.9543 99.091 4.598 5.020 4.989 0.581
Proposed method 52.521 0.9699 100.871 5.551 5.111 5.811 0.955
Table 1 Average results (without reference) on gray- scale dataset. The best results are shown in bold.
B. Computational Analysis
Table 2: compares the execution time of proposed method with other standard methods
Methods Time (in seconds)
Averaging 1.1155
DWT (1-level) 3.1302
DWT (3-level) 7.0023
SWT 4.0572
PCA 5.3712
Proposed method 3.2365
Table 2 Average results (without reference) on grayscale dataset. The best results are shown in bold.
REFERENCES
[1] Liu, Zhaodong, Yi Chai, Hongpeng Yin, Jiayi Zhou, and Zhiqin Zhu. "A novel multi-focus image fusion approach based on image decomposition."
Information Fusion 35 (2017): 102-116.
[2] M. Nejati, S. Samavi, and S. Shirani, "Multi-focus Image Fusion Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation", Information Fusion, vol. 25, Sept. 2015,
pp. 72-84.
[3] Multi focus image dataset, Available at: http://mansournejati.ece.iut.ac.ir/content/lytro-multi-focus-dataset.
[4] Y. Liu, S. Liu, Z. Wang, A general framework for image fusion based on multi-scale transform and sparse representation, Inf. Fusion 24 (2015) 147–164.
[5] B.K.S. Kumar, Image fusion based on pixel significance using cross bilateral filter, Signal Image Video Process. 9 (5) (2015) 1193–1204.
[6] S. Paul, I.S. Sevcenco, P. Agathoklis, Multi-exposure and multi-focus image fusion in gradient domain, J. Circuit Sys. Comp. (2016) 1650123.
[7] K. Zhan, J. Teng, Q. Li, J. Shi, A novel explicit multi-focus image fusion method, J. Inf. Hiding Multimedia Signal Process. 6 (3) (2015) 600–612.
[8] Farid, M.S., Mahmood, A. and Al-Maadeed, S.A., 2019. Multi-focus image fusion using Content Adaptive Blurring. Information Fusion, 45, pp.96-112.
[9] F. Samadzadegan, F. DadrasJavan, “Evaluating the Sensitivity of Image Fusion Quality Metrics to Image Degradation in Satellite Imagery”, Journal of the
Indian Society of Remote Sensing • December 2011, DOI: 10.1007/s12524-011-0117-z
[10] Basic Intensity Quantification with ImageJ, Available at
https://www.unige.ch/medecine/bioimaging/files/1914/1208/6000/Quantification.pdf
[11] Multi focus image dataset, Available at: http://dsp.etfbl.net/mif/
[12] V.P.S. Naidu, “Image Fusion technique using Multi-resolution singular Value decomposition”, Defence Science Journal, Vol. 61, No. 5, September 2011,
pp. 479-484.