Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PM NAWAZ SHARIF
After these leaks many politicians criticize Nawaz Sharif and said him
corrupt. Mainly Chairman of PTI Imran Khan made many protests against
PM and criticize him badly. Facing growing criticism, Sharif announced the
formation of a judicial commission under a retired judge of Supreme Court
of Pakistan.However no commission was formed.
1
people living in big houses and traveling in helicopters are accusing me
corrupt. Can they explain before the nation as to how they earned all this
money and how much they paid tax?"
After speech of Sharif, PTI chairman Imran Khan filed a petition to the
Supreme Court of Pakistan for the disqualification of Prime Minister Nawaz
Sharif.After this, other political leaders including Sheikh Rasheed and
Jamat-e-Islami's Siraj-ul-Haq also filed petition against Nawaz Sharif and his
family, son-in-law Muhammad Safdar and Financial Minister Ishaq Dar.On
September 30,2016 PTI workers stagged a sit-in outside Sharif's private
reidence at Raiwind, Lahore. Khan subsequently called on supporters to
lock-down Islamabad untill PM resigned.
2
After the retirement of Justice Jamali , a new bench headed by Justice Asif
Saeed Khosa was formed, the bench included Justice Azmat Saeed, Justice
Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, Justice Ejaz Afzal and Justice Gulzar Ahmed.PTI's lawyer
argued that Sharif's family failed to present any record on money trail. He
maintained that Maryam Nawaz paid no tax and she remained dependent
on her father. He added that Hussain Nawaz gifted Rs.810 million to his
father. He also highlighted the NAB's failure in Hudaibiya Paper Mills case in
2000. The hearings continues till February 23,2017. The Court reserved its
judgement on the same date.
1st VERDICT
The result of the case was announced at 2:00pm on April 20,2017. The
Supreme Court , in a 3-2 decision, detailed that there is insufficient
evidence to order Nawaz Sharif's removal from office, but ordered further
investigation. The Court ordered the formation of Joint Investigation Team
(JIT) under three member special bench which was later known as JIT
implementation bench. The two judges on the bench Justice Asif Saeed
Khosa and Justice Gulzar Ahmed were of the opinion that PM Nawaz Sharif
had not been honest to the nation and should be disqualified from office.
3
MI. The JIT functional headquarter was in Federal Judicial Academy,
Islamabad, and JIT was given a working budget of Rs.20 million.
The JIT was asked to investigate the money trail and offshore assets of
Nawaz's family. In this regard JIT was given ten points to investigate. The
main points are how did Gulf Steel came into being? How Hussain and
Hassan Nawaz in early nineties are able to purchase London flats? Who is
the beneficial owner of Nielson and Nescol Ltd? After the orders of
Supreme Court JIT started investigation.
Almost all the members of Sharif's family summoned before JIT for the
investigation of money trail.The JIT was given 2 months for investigation.
During this JIT submited a number of proceeding reports to the Supreme
Court of Pakistan.The Supreme Court ordered JIT to submit its final report
on July 10,2017.
JIT REPORT
Despite controversies, On July 10,2017 JIT submitted a 275-page report in
Supreme Court. The report requested NAB to file references against Nawaz,
his daughter Maryam and his sons. JIT noted that Nawaz's family was not
able to justify their assets and income. JIT proved that Maryam Nawaz has
been the beneficial owner of Nielson and Nescol. The report further stated
that Maryam submited false documents in Supreme Court. The basis of this
fact was the use of Calibri font in documents showed to be from 2006, but
the font was released publicly in 2007. The main finding of JIT is the
discovery of an offshore company FZE Capital in Dubai, managed by Nawaz
Sharif. Nawaz family rejected the JIT report and said report is fully made
against them.
After the submission of JIT report to Court, the Supreme Court began
hearing arguments from petitioners and respondents. Respondents lawyers
4
fully opposed the JIT report but petetioners accepted the report. On July
21,2017, the court concluded the hearings and reserved its judgement.