Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1995
~ Pergamon Copyright © i995 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
1350-6307/95 $9.50 + 0.00
1350 -6307(95)00024-0
SOON-BOK L E E
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology,
Science Town, Taejon, 305-701, Korea
Abstract--A steam exhaust silencer in a power-plant was subjected to thermal cycling as the
system was started up, operated and shut down. The acoustic splitters in the silencer were
blown out to about 80 m after only 6 months of operation. The cause of the significant failure
was low cycle thermal fatigue and fracture of the connection between the silencer case and the
inside splitter. A failure analysis was performed and a design modification was made to avoid
further failures.
1. I N T R O D U C T I O N
1.1. Background
The piping at a new power-plant was flushed with superheated steam. The exhaust
steam produced a servere acoustic noise. To reduce the noise, heavy-duty silencers
were used. A steam exhaust silencer used in a thermal power-plant failed prematurely
after only 6 months of service. The silencer was operated for several start-up and
shut-down cycles per day. The operating time was about 1 h per cycle. Superheated
steam at 500 ton h -1 was exhausted through the silencer. The outlet temperature of
the superheated steam was 450°C and the pressure was about 0.84MPa. The
maximum allowable noise level was 95 dB at 10 m from the silencer. Figure 1 shows
Fig. 1. Overall view of two silencers installed on the wall of the building.
248 SOON-BOK LEE
the overall view of two silencers installed on the side of the building. The silencer
consisted of a case and three acoustic splitters. The acoustic splitters were concentric
drums and were supported by steel bars welded to the splitter drums and the silencer
case. The drum-shaped case was insulated inside so that the outer surface tempera-
ture of the case was comparable to the ambient temperature. Figure 2 shows a
close-up view of the exhaust side of the silencer. Three concentric acoustic splitters
and the outer case were welded to eight supporting bars. The 100 × 100 m m H - b e a m s
were welded after the accident.
2. M A T E R I A L D A T A
The material of the structural parts of the silencer was SM45C steel (approximately
equivalent to AISI1040 steel). Monotonic and cyclic strain properties of the steel were
obtained from [1] as follows: coefficient of thermal expansion c~ = 10.8 x 10 -6°C -1,
Young's modulus E = 207 GPa, Poisson's ratio v = 0.28, ultimate tensile strength
Su = 621 MPa, yield strength Sy = 345 MPa, cyclic yield strength S'y = 386 MPa, cyclic
hardening exponent n' = 0 . 1 8 , true fracture strain e l = 0 . 9 3 , true fracture stress
of = 1050MPa, fatigue limit Sf = 173 MPa, fatigue strength coefficient or'f= 1540
Fig. 2. Close-up view of the exhaust side of the silencer. Three concentric acoustic splitters
and the outer case are welded to eight supporting bars. The 100 x 100 mm H-beams were
welded after the accident.
Thermal fatigue of a silencer 249
Fig. 3. Front side of the silencer. Cracks are highlighted by fluorescent dye penetrant.
Fig. 4. Weld failure on the supporting bar of the splitters. The index finger points to the
cracks at the welds.
MPa, fatigue ductility coefficient e'~ = 0.61, fatigue strength exponent b = - 0 . 1 4 , and
fatigue ductility exponent c -- - 0 . 5 7 .
3. F A I L U R E A N A L Y S I S
3.1. Applied load on the silencer
The silencer was subjected to fluctuating mechanical stress by flow-induced vibra-
tion thermal cycles and thermal gradients. Vibration loads in the silencer can be
250 SOON-BOK LEE
expected as a result of rapidly fluctuating steam pressures, and turbulent steam flow
at a high flow rate. The silencer was subjected to pressure and thermal cycling during
start-up and shut-down. Transient thermal gradients of a lesser degree occurred
during operation between the silencer case and the acoustic splitter supporting bars.
The outer case of the silencer (2750 mm in diameter) was exposed to air and the
acoustic splitters were subjected to the superheated steam. The outer case and
splitters has a different temperature due to the internal insulation. Drum-shaped
splitters were supported with steel bars attached to the splitters with welds. Eight
supporting bars were welded radially to the concentric splitters. Figure 2 shows the
steam exhaust side of the silencer with supporting bars covered by 100 × 100 mm
H-beams welded after the accident to prevent further blow-out.
The amount of expansion in the supporting steel bar is greater than the radial
expansion of the splitters. Therefore, the supporting bars were under high thermal
stress. This cyclic thermal stress produced low cycle fatigue damage on the supporting
bars between the splitter and the case of the silencer. Once a crack formed in the
supporting bars and grew to a critical length, the splitter became detached from the
silencer and the superheated steam blew the splitter out, causing an accident.
1600-
1400
1200
Cl
1000
111
o
z 800
<
f~
(¢)
600 ASME Section V / v . 2
iii
E
i-
u) 400- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
200-
0 I I I I I I
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE AT (°C)
Fig. 6. Comparison of elastically calculated thermal stress range with limits imposed by codes.
252 SOON-BOK LEE
creep damage can be evaluated with the damage evaluation procedure outlined in the
physically based phenomenological approach [5]. However, this phenomenological
approach requires extensive material properties of the high-temperature structure,
and also exact life prediction is not necessary for this failure analysis. Therefore, a
simple approach, such as Manson's 10% life rule for high-temperature life prediction,
can be used as follows:
4. D E S I G N M O D I F I C A T I O N
4.1. Temporary remedv
The silencer was reassembled temporarily with the same design but the outlet of
the silencer was covered with a welded fence as shown in Fig. 2 so that the splitters
could not be blown out by the steam exhaust. However, cracks occurred in the head
portion of the silencer case as shown in Fig. 3. Therefore it was advisable to redesign
the silencer to accept the thermal expansion produced by elevated temperature
operation.
i FLAT BAR
I II~COUSTIC ii
...
!II ACOUSTIC
.. L.,I lI
I DIFFUSER I | ~ SPLITTER ii ill SPLITTER I ol
LL_L_I__!i_ J . . . .4-SADDLE
. L .... k__~QI EL+22612
/ ol
L ~850 h 1935 ] ,8,5 .L_ ,,,o _~_] ! ?00 ! 600 i 600 ?oo I
I 2Boo
J
I 8000 I
M16 BOLl
J-p
Fig. 9. Overall set-up of the redesigned silencer at the power plant site.
5. S U M M A R Y
(2) High temperatures during operation produced thermal stress which was applied
repeatedly to the splitter, and induced the failure of the silencer by thermal fatigue at
the connection area between the silencer case and the inside splitter.
(3) The concentric drum type acoustic splitters were changed to a series of vertical
plate type acoustic splitters. New acoustic splitters were designed to slip around the
bolts so that the thermal stress could be reduced due to free expansion.
REFERENCES
1. H. O. Fuchs and R. I. Stephens, Metal Fatigue in Engineering, John Wiley, New York (1980).
2. A. P. Boresi, R. J. Schmidt and O. M. Sidebottom, Advanced Mechanics of Materials (5th edn), John
Wiley, New York (1993).
3. D. V. French, Metals Handbook (9th edn), Vol. 11, Failure Analysis and Prevention, American Society
for Metals (1986).
4. S. S. Manson, Exp. Mech. 5, 193 (1965)
5. S. B. Lee and A. K. Miller, Trans. A S M E J. Engng Mater. Technol. 117(3) (1995).