Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.1 Introduction
The Philippine economy is predominantly based on the agriculture sector. Figures from the
Philippine Statistics Authority states that in 2015, 7.190 million hectares out of the 29.817 million
hectares of the total land area of the country are agricultural lands. An agricultural area is
considered as such by its utilization. This includes arable land, permanent cropland, permanent
meadows/pastures, forestland and other lands. In the same year, agricultural employment is
38.74 million persons, which shares a 29 percent to the total employment in the country. But
these figures have significantly dwindled down. In 2012, the total agricultural land area is 9.671
million hectares. For a period of three years, the total agricultural land area decreased by 2.481
million hectares or 74.35%. Between 1988 and 2016, a period when the Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform Law took effect, a total of 97, 592.5 hectares of prime agricultural land (arable
and permanent cropland) was approved for conversion to non-agricultural purposes according
to the Department of Agriculture. The figure does not include pending applications for land
conversion, lands reclassified by local government units and illegally converted agricultural
lands.
The rampant conversion of prime agricultural land, driven mainly by urbanization, population
growth and land speculation, together with government neglect and failed policies contributes to
the worsening problem of food security in the country. In the report published by the Economist
Intelligence Unit for the 2016 Global Food Security Index, a report that ranks countries based on
how they are secure when it comes to supplying food for their populations, the Philippines was
ranked at No. 74. This ranking was based not only on the countries capability to produce food
but also to other factors such as the general populations being able to afford food, storage
facilities, processing and transportation of food as well as nutrition and dietary standards. This
ranking is in contrast to our country having its economy largely based on agriculture
With the rapid urbanization in our country and the growing demand for sustainable and
affordable food supply, it is necessary to develop an engineering solution in order to cater such
problems. The design of a five-story vertical farming building can be a solution to this. This
structure combines innovative farming methods such as hydroponics with an efficient building
design that can sustain plant and vegetable production. This capstone design will make it
possible to grow food continuously in an environment that will protect the crops from
unpredictable and harmful weather. It can reduce water consumption through the reuse of water
and it eliminates the need for pesticides, fertilizers or herbicides. Since the crops will be produced
in the urban area, the long and costly transport of crops from the rural area to the urban center
will not be a concern anymore. The crop yield of this food production design is relatively high
considering the fact that only a small land area will be needed for the construction of the building
where high rise farming will be utilized. The building will be located at Pioneer Street, Barangka
Ilaya, Mandaluyong City right beside Puyat Steel Corporation and in front of Axis Residences.
1
Figure 1-1. Project Location Site
The objective of this project is to design a five-story building that is exclusively built for food
production in accordance to design standards provided by the National Structural Code of the
Philippines 2010 and the National Building Code of the Philippines.
2
1.2.2 Specific Objectives
1. To design the structure, provide architectural plans, cost estimates and schedules for
the design project.
2. To design the constraints and tradeoffs in order to produce the final design output.
The target client of this capstone design is Mr. Jose Sio, the current Chief Executive Officer of
the SM Investments Corporation. The SM Investments Corporation (SMIC) is a holding company
with interests in shopping mall development and management, retail, real estate development,
banking and tourism. It currently has 208 retail stores nationwide, 37 of which are SM Hypermarkets
and 86 are Save More Branches. With this design project, the SMIC can have its own source of farm
produce at Metro Manila, near its hypermarkets and Save More branches. SMIC can have an
advantage over its competitors by having a constant and quality supply of farm produce such as
vegetables at its disposal.
The design of the five-story vertical farming building will include the architectural plan and
structural design of the building. For the architectural plan, it will only include the floor plans, elevation
plans and cross sectional view. For the structural design, the necessary structural plans and
computations of structural members will be produced. Cost estimates and construction schedule for
the project will also be done.
The design of the structure will be based primarily on four major constraints. These are the
following:
a. Economic
b. Labor Intensiveness
c. Constructability
d. Serviceability
This capstone design will not include the sanitary and plumbing layout for the watering
system for the plants. It will also not include the mechanical and electrical analysis of the structure.
3
1.5 Project Development Cycle
Start
Identification of all design inputs including a review of all related literature and studies
End
4
CHAPTER 2: DESIGN INPUT
The structure can be generally subdivided into three parts: the office, commercial and
planting area. The office and commercial area are located at the ground floor. The office area
includes the administration office, human resources office and engineering department office. The
commercial area includes a grocery store that will sell the vegetable produce of the building and a
restaurant that will highlight the farm produce of the building. The second to fourth floor will be
allocated as planting area. Vertical racks will be used as planting platform and the method for growing
plants will be hydroponics. The storage room for the vegetables and the delivery area is located at
the ground floor.
5
2.2 Architectural Plans
The succeeding pages contains the floor plan, elevation plan and cross-sectional view of the
project.
6
2.3 Soil Map in Mandaluyong
The project site for the five-story vertical farm building is located at Pioneer Street, Barangka
Ilaya, Mandaluyong City. The soil type for the site is Novaliches Clay Loam Adobe.
In the design of our building, our trade-offs will focus on the type of seismic-force
resisting system. One of the seismic-force resisting systems that we are going to use will be
a reinforced concrete special moment frame. J. Moehle et. al (2008) stated in their report
entitled “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frames” that “Reinforced
concrete special moment frames are used as part of seismic force-resisting systems in
buildings that are designed to resist earthquakes. Beams, columns, and beam-column joints
in moment frames are proportioned and detailed to resist flexural, axial, and shearing actions
that result as a building sways through multiple displacement cycles during strong
earthquake ground shaking. Special proportioning and detailing requirements result in a
frame capable of resisting strong earthquake shaking without significant loss of stiffness or
strength. These moment-resisting frames are called “Special Moment Frames” because of
these additional requirements, which improve the seismic resistance in comparison with less
stringently detailed Intermediate and Ordinary Moment Frames.” Their report will guide us
18
in the design of the reinforced concrete special moment frames.
Another trade-off that we are going to use in our design will be the steel special
moment frames. R. Hamburger et. al (2009) in their report entitled “Seismic Design of Steel
Special Moment Frames: A Guide for Practicing Engineers” they mentioned that “The
principal advantage of moment frame structures is that they do not have structural walls or
vertically oriented diagonal braces. They therefore provide architectural freedom in design,
permitting open bays and unobstructed view lines. The tradeoff for these benefits is that
moment frames can be more costly to construct than braced frame or shear wall structures.
The added cost results from the use of heavier sections in the moment- resisting frames,
requiring increased steel usage and more labor- intensive connections than is common in
braced structures. However, moment frames typically impose smaller forces on foundations
than do other structural systems, resulting in somewhat more economical foundation
systems.” Their report will greatly help us in the design of steel special moment frames.
Our third trade-off for the design of the vertical farming building will be the use of a
dual system with ordinary reinforced concrete shear wall. S. Borra et. al (2015) stated in
their report entitled “Design Method of Reinforced Shear Wall using EBCD” that “Shear walls
are deep relatively thin vertically reinforced concrete beams. They are commonly used in
the structures to resist the effects of gravity loads and storey shears. Shear walls are vertical
elements in the lateral force resisting system that transmit lateral forces from the diaphragm
above to the diaphragm below or to the foundation. Shear walls may also bearing walls in
the gravity load system or they may be components in dual system framed so as to resist
only lateral loads.” Their report will help us in designing the dual system framing system that
we are going to use in our design.
In the design of the project, understanding the concept of a vertical farm is crucial
for a sustainable and economically viable design. Here in the Philippines, one of the attempts
to create a vertical farm was done in Muntinlupa City. In the article of L. Cruz (2004) in the
Manila Bulletin entitled “In Muntinlupa: vertical farming system reduces waste material”, he
featured a vertical farming system. He stated, “Vertical Farming System (VFS) has been
introduced by the city’s Department of Agriculture primarily to help reduce non-recyclable
waste products and increase food sufficiency and income to growers. VFS is mostly
applicable to highly urbanized areas that are expectedly congested and has limited available
spaces or lots to be dedicated for the planting vegetables, root crops or fruits. Thus through
the VFS, small plants such as kangkong, pechay, mustasa, sili and the like are planted upon
old plastics, tin cans, broken pails, sacks, styropore, ketchup containers, noodle plastics,
soft drinks cups and bottles and even broken electric fans and old tires. Plants usually
aligned on top of the other, hanged or in a vertical position to save space and lots. From this
article, City Agriculture officials said a pilot garden is located on a one hectare lot at South
Greenheights Village in barangay Putatan where VFS is vividly practiced and shown for
19
viewing, lecture, and touring purposes of city’s visitors, clients and beneficiaries. The City
Agriculture officials also said that the other local government units and even foreign cities
admire the said practice in showroom and some are currently replicating the urban farming
project in their jurisdiction.”
This article helped us understand that having a vertical farm, although in a small
setting, would help resolve the problem of having limited spaces for farming in highly
urbanized areas.
In a design project by J.L. Cuello in 2015 entitled “The Minimally Structured Modular
& Prefabricated Vertical Farm or The Vertical Green Box Solution”, he conducted
the required standard of vertical farm platform or operating system to accelerate growth and
development of the vertical farming industry. He introduced his design as minimally
structured that reduces load-bearing requirement, reduced services, reduced materials and
reduced total weight. The prefabrication on off-site construction and assembly of modules
significantly lower the cost of construction and labor. He stated that “For modular units it
must be in transparent sides, an operator may or may not be intended to step onto the
modular structure to keep structure lightweight in design and operator may use forms of
mechanical devices, like conveyor belts, to gain convenient access to the crops.”
The design of J.L Cuello gave us an idea on how to lessen the cost of constructing
a vertical farm without sacrificing the structural integrity of the building.
A vertical farm for commercial production is the target goal of our design. In the
article by L. Garfield (2016), he featured the world’s largest vertical farm, the Aero Farms.
He mentioned in his article “This kind of vertical farm grows plants by placing them in trays
stacked up to 30 feet high instead of directly planting them to the ground. The light supply
of the plants came from LED lights instead of the sun. Fans spin continuously, and a sprinkle
of fertilizer feeds the plants every few hours. To get into mass production, the Aero Farms
workers are using data to monitor and learn about the plants. They collect 30,000 data points
on temperature, humidity, CO2, and oxygen levels. Data scientists from universities such as
Harvard and MIT analyze these metrics in real-time using machine-learning software. The
goal is to optimize the growing algorithms of 250 different types of plants. Once the farmers
figure out the best way to grow the greens, they can replicate the method every time. Rising
energy costs produce uncertainties as to whether the vertical farmers can grow greens cost-
effectively in the long-term.”
This article gave us an idea on how to design a vertical farm that is capable of mass
production. The use of LED as a lighting system was considered in our design.
Although our design focuses on creating a building for a vertical farming system, the
building can also be integrated with other functions of a building. In the article entitled “Tour
Vivante project” by SOA architects (2007) they discussed a vertical farm mixed with housing
and offices. The concept was to associate the agricultural production, dwelling, and activities
in a single and vertical system. This system will allow the city to be denser while having
greater autonomy through reliance in agricultural plains thereby reducing the transportation
needs between urban and extra-urban territories. The yet unusual superimposition of these
programs finally make it possible to consider new practical and energetic relations between
agricultural culture, tertiary spaces, housing and trade, inducing strong energy saving
capacities.
The question of why vertical farming system and the use of artificial lighting in our
design was answered through one of the research study conducted by D. Touliatos, et. al
(2015). The objective of their study was to compare a Vertical Farming Systems (VFS)
20
where plants were grown in upright cylindrical columns against in a conventional Horizontal
Hydroponic System (HHS) using lettuce as a model crop. Both systems had similar root
zone volume and planting density. Half-strength Hoagland’s solution was applied to plants
grown in perlite in an indoor controlled environment room, with metal halide lamps providing
artificial lighting. Light distribution (photosynthetic photon flux density, PPFD) and yield
(shoot fresh weight) within each system were assessed. Although PPFD and shoot fresh
weight decreased significantly in the VFS from top to base, the VFS produced more crop
per unit of growing floor area when compared with the HHS. This study clearly demonstrate
that VFS presents an attractive alternative to horizontal hydroponic growth systems and
suggest that further increases in yield could be achieved by incorporating artificial lighting in
the VFS.
The problem of whether a vertical farm is viable and what are its benefits and the
challenges posed by such design were explained by the study conducted by J. Almeer, et. al.
(2015). They analyzed and assessed numerous types of urban and vertical farms for their
viability, benefits, and challenges. They also reviewed existing farms, buildings, and
greenhouse certification schemes to identify key sustainability considerations for these
farms. Their objective was to develop the groundwork for a sustainable certification system
that will establish a common set of standards and requirements for the members of the
Association for Vertical Farming. The findings of the study show that the mean age of the
farms is 6 years old, with an average growing facility size of 14,000 square feet. The most
common growing systems used are hydroponics and aquaponics, and the most frequent
types of crops grown are lettuces, leafy greens, herbs, and tomatoes. From a harvesting
perspective, the “one and done” crops (single plantings with immediate replacement) are
harvested on average 23 times per year, while “cut and come again” crops (planting which
continue to produce even after being harvested) are harvested on a weekly or biweekly
basis. The system framework was designed around the nine Common Applicability
Principles, aligned into four Assessment Categories – Farm, Product, System and
Community. According to the study, in order to create appropriate sustainability standards
for urban and vertical farms, it is necessary to design a system that begins with data
collection and benchmarking to create an internal database of these metrics and begin to
analyze industry practices.
2.4.5 Hydroponics
The method of growing plants that we are going to use in our design would be
hydroponics. In the study conducted by M. D. Senillo (2004), he evaluated the difference of
various vegetables grown in SNAP hydroponics and conventional production system. The
effects of nutrient source and volume of aggregates on the growth and yield of selected
vegetable under the SNAP hydroponics system was also determined. Among the four
vegetables grown, sweet pepper and lettuce performed well under the SNAP hydroponics
system. The plants were taller, produced more leaves, matured earlier and had higher yields
compared to those grown under the conventional production system. Both sweet pepper and
lettuce grown in full-strength commercial hydroponics solutions (CHS) had higher
percentage survival, produced heavier roots, and more leaves, matured earlier, and had
higher yield than those grown in half-strength commercial hydroponics solution + fish –
molasses mixture (FMM). Plants fed with the latter nutrient source, however, had higher net
returns because of lower production cost. Lettuce and sweet pepper grown in bigger volume
21
of aggregates (9 oz.) had higher percent survival, were taller, had more leaves, produced
heavier roots and had higher yield compared to those grown in 6 oz. cup. Thus, higher net
returns were obtained in plants grown in 9 oz. styropor cup supplied with CHS. The study of
Senillo proved that hydroponics can be a practical and sustainable alternative to a
conventional production of vegetables.
The concept of hydroponics was elaborately discussed in the study by E. Suavillo
et. al. They stated “Hydroponics aimed to create a material that could contain the plants’
ntutrient solution”. According to their research, the recommended pH for nutrient solutions
used in hydroponics system is about 5.5 – 5.8; the overall availability of nutrients is optimum
at a slightly acidic medium. The lab-formulated solutions were therefore maintained at pH
between 5.5 and 6.0. Their laboratory studies and trials demonstrated that simple and
portable hydroponics setup, using styro-cup filled with vermiculate or vermiculate – perlite
materials, can be used to grow plants such as basil. Initial trials showed healthy growing
mustard plants in styropor cups containing vermiculite and/or vermiculite – perlite and
sustained with the lab-formulated nutrient solutions. However, duplicate trials were not
successful. With more studies, mustard may be grown in the system successfully. On the
other hand, arugula requires a cool environment and may best be grown hydroponically in
the cooler locations such as Baguio and Tagaytay. This study recommended that the
hydroponics setup should be modified so that rainwater could not dilute the nutrient solution
(NS) and insects/mosquito larvae do not contaminate the NS. Foliar spray, a dilute nutrient
solution or calcium nitrate solution should have been used when smaller leaves are observed
or when the annual plants are aging.
22
CHAPTER 3: CONSTRAINTS, TRADE-OFFS AND STANDARDS
Four constraints were used for this project to determine the most adequate design. The
constraints in this design project are economic (material cost), labor intensiveness (number of
laborers), constructability (number of working days) and serviceability (lateral deflection). The
constraints are discussed below and will be used to evaluate the trade-offs for this design project.
Budget restrictions are the main constraint for this design project. Vertical farms
constructed abroad required a relatively costly budget before start of production. This is
because aside from constructing the building for the vertical farm, the owner should also
invest for the appropriate plant growing method and setup. This includes purchasing vertical
racks, plant monitoring equipment and other plant growing setups. Hence there is a need to
minimize as much as possible the other costs in setting up the vertical farm.
For the evaluation of the economic aspect of the design, only the cost of the
materials and manpower for the main structural elements will be looked into. These structural
elements would be the beams, columns, slab and the foundation.
The tradeoff that addresses the economic aspect of the vertical farm would be the
seismic-force resisting system for the structure. The different seismic-force resisting system
would be special steel moment-resisting frame, special reinforced concrete moment-
resisting frame and dual system with reinforced concrete shear wall.
A special steel moment-resisting frame requires using heavier section and more
labor-intensive connections. Heavier sections and more detailed connections mean higher
cost for the project. Special reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames also require
heavier beam and column sections. Dual systems with shear wall on the other hand uses
ordinary frames that translates to lighter beam cross sections but the additional materials for
the shear wall adds to its total cost.
23
3.1.3 Constructability (Number of Working Days)
The ease and efficiency with which the building can be built should be integrated
into the design. The constructability aspect of the design will be evaluated based on the
number of working days to finish the structural aspect of the project, namely, foundation
laying, column erection and beam and slab construction.
Concrete based structures have curing periods which adds to the construction time
compared to steel structures which are prefabricated and easily installed through welds or
bolted connections. This places steel structures to have faster construction time than
reinforced concrete buildings.
Serviceability refers to the condition under which a building is still considered useful.
It refers to conditions other than the building strength that render the buildings unusable.
Serviceability limit state design of structures includes factors such as durability, overall
stability, deflection, cracking and excessive vibration.
Checking the lateral deflection of the most stressed column for each trade-off would
be the basis for determining the serviceability aspect of the design.
Deflection of columns for the three trade-offs depends on factors such as the length
of the member, applied load, modulus of elasticity and the moment of inertia. For reinforced
concrete, larger cross sections would lessen the deflection. This goes the same for steel
frames.
3.2. Trade-Offs
The designers chose three trade-offs for the design of the five-story vertical farming building.
The trade-offs are classified on the type of basic seismic-force resisting system to be used for the
structure.
Having a different seismic-force resisting system was considered a trade-off since the
building will be located at a distance of almost a kilometer from the West Valley Fault. The proximity
of the project to the active fault system requires constructing the appropriate seismic-force resisting
system with consideration to the constraints set for the project such as the materials cost and number
of working days for project completion.
24
A disadvantage of using special steel moment resisting frame is the cost. Heavier
sections and detailed connections are needed for this framing system. In the Philippines,
structural steels are imported from other countries which adds up to its cost.
3.2.2 Special Reinforced Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame System
Special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame, like special steel moment
frames, needs to be proportioned and detailed to safely undergo extensive inelastic
deformations that are anticipated in seismic category A. Since the location of the vertical
farm is within seismic category A, the use of such framing system helps ensure that the
frame undergo ductile behavior.
Other characteristics of reinforced concrete that makes it an ideal material for
construction are its low-maintenance, great resistance to fire and water and long service life
compared to other materials. A disadvantage however of using reinforced concrete is that
additional construction time is allotted for the curing process of the concrete.
The evaluation of constraints are ranked according to the level of importance using a formula
from the Model on Trade-off Strategies in Engineering Design by Otto and Antonsson (1991). The
importance of each criterion (on a scale of 0 to 10, 10 being the highest importance) was assigned
and each design methodology’s ability to satisfy the criterion (on a scale of 0 to 10, 10 being the
highest ability to satisfy the criterion) was also tabulated. The governing rank for each criterion
involved was based on the initial research and analysis made by the designers.
The computation of ranking ability to satisfy the criterion of the design proposal can be
computed by the following equations:
25
The governing rank and the value for each criterion’s importance depends on the subjective
choice of the designer. The subordinate rank corresponds to its percentage distance from the
governing rank along the ranking scale. In testing the ability to satisfy a criterion, the governing trade-
off in terms of which design yielded the lowest value will be ranked the same as the criterion’s level
of importance for all four constraints. The subordinate rank of the other design with higher values will
be computed in accordance to Equation 3-1 and 3-2.
Trade-Offs
Special Reinforced
Special Steel Dual System with
Constraint Concrete Moment-
Moment-Resisting Ordinary Reinforced
Resisting Frame
Frame System Concrete Shear Wall
System
Economic (Cost) P 20,601,789.6 P 8,868,323.53 P 10,078,201.77
Labor
Intensiveness (No. 212 workers 240 workers 249 workers
of Laborers)
Constructability
(No. of Working 146 days 150 days 174 days
Days)
Serviceability
45.61 mm 47.299 mm 44.039 mm
(Deflection)
Table 3-2 shows the constraints that have been developed in order to compare the three
trade-offs. The design with the highest score using the equation of Otto and Antonsson (1991) will
26
be considered the best design as it is measured using the applicable constraints. The first trade-off
yielded 83.22, the second yielded 94.9 and the third trade-off yielded 89.79.
Based on the initial analysis of the trade-offs and its over-all ranking, Trade-Off 2, special
reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame system would be the best design. In the succeeding
chapter, the designers will analyze further the three trade-offs based on the constraints mentioned
above in order to verify if the initial analysis is accurate.
For this design project, the following codes were used by the designers in designing the three
trade-offs and in coming up with the final design of the structure.
3.4.1 National Building Code of the Philippines
The National Building Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 1096) was
formulated and adopted as a uniform building code to embody up-to-date and modern technical
knowledge on building design, construction, use, occupancy and maintenance. The Code
provides for all buildings and structures, a framework of minimum standards and requirements to
regulate and control location, site, design, and quality of materials, construction, use, occupancy,
and maintenance.
3.4.2 National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2010, Volume 1- Buildings, Towers
and other Vertical Structures, 7th Edition
The NSCP provides minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, property and public welfare
by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials pertaining to the
structural aspects of all buildings and structures within its jurisdiction. The provision of this code
shall apply to the construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair, maintenance and use of any
building or structure within its jurisdiction, except work located primarily in a public way, public
utility towers and poles, hydraulic flood control structures, and indigenous family dwellings.
27
CHAPTER 4: DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE
This design methodology flow chart is composed of the design procedure and parameters
that enables the designers to achieve the desired outcome. It will start on modeling the structure in
the design software and performing the analysis for each trade-offs.
START
Special Steel Moment- Special Reinforced Concrete Dual System with Ordinary
Resisting Frame System Moment-Resisting Frame Reinforced Concrete Shear
System Wall
Special Steel Moment- Special Reinforced Concrete Dual System with Ordinary
Resisting Frame System Moment-Resisting Frame Reinforced Concrete Shear
System Wall
28
A
DESIGN OF FOOTING
END
29
4.2 Structural Analysis START
LOAD SPECIFICATIONS
END
30
4.2.1 Design of Steel-Daylight
Dead Load
Component Description Load (kPa)
Suspended Steel Channel System 0.10
Ceiling
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Protection
0.50
and Sanitary
1.4 mm Deck with 150 mm slab
3.704
Composite Floor Deck thickness
Concrete Fill Finish (20 mm) 0.46
Windows, Glass, Frame and Sash 0.38
Frame Walls
Monolithic Glass, 6 mm 0.1506
Hollow Concrete Masonry Units 100
2.50
Interior Walls mm Full Grout Spacing 16.5 kN/m3
Plaster on Both Faces 0.48
Windows, Glass, Frame and Sash 0.38
Roofing
Tempered Glass, 12 mm 0.3012
Inclined Staircase Slab (150 mm) 3.54
Landing Slab 3.54
Stair Steps (Riser: 160 mm, Tread: 250
1.888
mm, Width of Step: 1.2 m)
Concrete Fill Finish (10 mm) 0.23
Live Load
Category Description Load (kPa)
Main Area 6
Light Storage Roof 1
Stairs 3
Earthquake Load
Parameters Value
Seismic Importance Factor 1
Soil Profile Type Sb
Seismic Zone Factor 0.4
Seismic Source Type A
Near Source Factor Na 1.2
31
Near Source Factor Nv 1.6
Seismic Coefficient Ca 0.48
Seismic Coefficient Cv 0.64
R 8
Ct 0.0853
Structural Period, T 0.866 sec
32
26 Footing Service Load Combination 5 0.6DL - 0.71Ez
27 Footing Service Load Combination 6 DL + LL + 0.71Ex
28 Footing Service Load Combination 7 DL + LL + 0.71Ez
29 Footing Service Load Combination 8 DL + LL - 0.71Ex
30 Footing Service Load Combination 9 DL + LL - 0.71Ez
31 Footing Factored Load Combination 1 1.4DL
32 Footing Factored Load Combination 2 1.2DL + 1.6LL
33 Footing Factored Load Combination 3 1.2DL + LL + Ex
34 Footing Factored Load Combination 4 1.2DL + LL + Ez
35 Footing Factored Load Combination 5 1.2DL + LL - Ex
36 Footing Factored Load Combination 6 1.2DL + LL - Ez
37 Footing Factored Load Combination 7 0.9DL + Ex
38 Footing Factored Load Combination 8 0.9DL + Ez
39 Footing Factored Load Combination 9 0.9DL - Ex
40 Footing Factored Load Combination 10 0.9DL - Ez
The following earthquake loads was used in load combinations set forth in Section 203 of the
NSCP.
E=ρ(Eh)+(Ev)
Em=(Ωo)( Eh)
For simplicity, ρ was assumed as having a value of 1.25. Vertical effects of the seismic load were
also considered by adding a value to the dead load effect by 0.5CaID. The designers also decided
not to take into account in the analysis the wind load effects because of the proximity of the
building to a major fault line (West Valley Fault). It was assumed that the governing lateral force for
the structure would be the seismic load
33
4.2.1.3 STAAD Models and Analysis
34
Figure 4.8: Dead Load Figure 4.9.1: Seismic Load Along x-axis
Figure 4.9.2: Seismic Load Along z-axis Figure 4.10: Wind Load
35
4.2.1.4 Framing Plan
36
37
38
39
40
41
4.2.1.5 Beam Loadings
42
B11 4.29 2.83 B36 -161 194
B12 6.95 6.3 B37 171 221
B13 -6.31 6.58 B38 -166 210
B14 -13.5 41.7 B39 -167 220
B15 135 206 B40 -167 225
B16 -104 111 B41 131 195
B17 -67.2 75 B42 131 195
B18 -49.9 55.8 B43 204 278
B19 13.7 16.6 B44 -159 237
B20 13.2 19 B45 9.89 5.97
B21 -21.5 23.7 B46 109 162
B22 -20.7 22.7 B47 9.82 6.12
B23 -21.5 24.6 B48 150 244
B24 -28.9 49.3 B49 -112 207
B25 -86.3 111
43
Fifth Floor (Beam)
Beam Fy Absolute Maximum Moment(KN.m)) Beam Fy Absolute Maximum Moment(KN.m))
B1 7.6 11.5 B15 -28.5 54.9
B2 -3.53 16.1 B16 -25.9 28.2
B3 -85.8 116 B17 -35.1 67.1
B4 88.9 88.9 B18 -101 123
B5 -35.6 71.5 B19 -106 143
B6 148 220 B20 -141 209
B7 -109 118 B21 141 209
B8 -67.2 75 B22 183 215
B9 -49.8 55.7 B23 -139 177
B10 -9.93 11.3 B24 9.98 5.75
B11 -12.8 31.6 B25 118 176
B12 -86.1 121 B26 9.86 5.83
B13 -33.2 37.3 B27 125 167
B14 -24.6 38.8 B28 -87.9 131
Roof (Beam)
Beam Fy Absolute Maximum Moment(KN.m)) Beam Fy Absolute Maximum Moment(KN.m))
B1 20.9 24.8 B9 23.4 34.9
B2 18.4 18.5 B10 23.4 34.8
B3 32.6 42.9 B11 23.5 24.4
B4 30.1 32.1 B12 -37.9 68.3
B5 19.2 22.1 B13 20.5 30
B6 16.7 18.8 B14 20.4 30.2
B7 -19.5 24.6 B15 18.2 25.3
B8 -29.1 57.1 B16 -27.1 53.1
44
4.2.1.6 Column Loadings
45
C13 419 58.4 62.7 4
C14 599 -58.6 79.5 4
C15 670 57.3 90.6 4
C16 1411 -109 109 4
C17 1816 19.8 162 4
C18 972 11.6 167 4
C19 28.4 48 35.7 4
C20 44.4 69.4 55.6 4
C21 145 59.2 57.7 4
C22 225 59.1 57.4 4
C23 321 -59.7 50.7 4
C24 392 58.9 43.9 4
C25 776 -84.9 38.4 4
C26 948 26.6 51.6 4
C27 479 -16.1 10.4 4
46
Fourth Floor-Fifth Floor (Column)
Column Fx (KN) My(KN.m) Mz (KN. M) Length (m)
C1 29.5 -44.1 54.9 4
C2 44.5 55.5 74.9 4
C3 252 77.5 93 4
C4 386 28.4 118 4
C5 194 2.75 101 4
C6 54.8 53.2 59 4
C7 455 -101 62.8 4
C8 671 -10.2 109 4
C9 365 7.61 94.5 4
C10 29 -47.8 13.1 4
C11 43.8 60 40.9 4
C12 255 82.9 41.6 4
C13 366 -17.1 65.4 4
C14 188 -19.3 32.5 4
47
4.2.1.7 Support Reactions
48
4.2.2 Design of Concrete
START
LOAD SPECIFICATIONS
END
Figure 4.17: Concrete Design Process
49
4.2.2.1 Design Parameters
Dead Load
Component Description Load (kPa)
Suspended Steel Channel System 0.10
Ceiling
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Protection
0.50
and Sanitary
150 mm slab 3.54
Floor and Floor Finishes
Concrete Fill Finish (50 mm) 1.15
Interior Wall Partition 1
Windows, Glass, Frame and Sash 0.38
Frame Walls
Monolithic Glass, 6 mm 0.1506
Hollow Concrete Masonry Units 100
2.50
Interior Walls mm Full Grout Spacing 16.5 kN/m3
Plaster on Both Faces 0.48
Windows, Glass, Frame and Sash 0.38
Roofing
Tempered Glass, 12 mm 0.3012
Inclined Staircase Slab (150 mm) 3.54
Landing Slab 3.54
Stair Steps (Riser: 160 mm, Tread: 250
1.888
mm, Width of Step: 1.2 m)
Concrete Fill Finish (10 mm) 0.23
Live Load
Category Description Load (kPa)
Main Area 6
Light Storage Roof 1
Stairs 3
Earthquake Load
Parameters Value
Seismic Importance Factor 1
Soil Profile Type Sb
Seismic Zone Factor 0.4
Seismic Source Type A
Near Source Factor Na 1.2
Near Source Factor Nv 1.6
Seismic Coefficient Ca 0.48
50
Seismic Coefficient Cv 0.64
R 8.5
Ct 0.0731
Structural Period, T 0.805 sec
51
28 Footing Service Load Combination 7 DL + LL + 0.71Ez
29 Footing Service Load Combination 8 DL + LL - 0.71Ex
30 Footing Service Load Combination 9 DL + LL - 0.71Ez
31 Footing Factored Load Combination 1 1.4DL
32 Footing Factored Load Combination 2 1.2DL + 1.6LL
33 Footing Factored Load Combination 3 1.2DL + LL + Ex
34 Footing Factored Load Combination 4 1.2DL + LL + Ez
35 Footing Factored Load Combination 5 1.2DL + LL - Ex
36 Footing Factored Load Combination 6 1.2DL + LL - Ez
37 Footing Factored Load Combination 7 0.9DL + Ex
38 Footing Factored Load Combination 8 0.9DL + Ez
39 Footing Factored Load Combination 9 0.9DL - Ex
40 Footing Factored Load Combination 10 0.9DL - Ez
The following earthquake loads was used in load combinations set forth in Section 203 of the
NSCP.
E=ρ(Eh)+(Ev)
Em=(Ωo)( Eh)
For simplicity, ρ was assumed as having a value of 1.25. Vertical effects of the seismic load were
also considered by adding a value to the dead load effect by 0.5CaID. The designers also decided
not to take into account in the analysis the wind load effects because of the proximity of the
building to a major fault line (West Valley Fault). It was assumed that the governing lateral force for
the structure would be the seismic load
52
4.2.2.3 STAAD Models and Analysis
53
Figure 4.23: Dead Load Figure 4.24.1: Seismic Load Along x-axis
Figure 4.24.2: Seismic Load Along z-axis Figure 4.25: Wind Load
54
4.2.2.4 Framing Plan
55
56
57
58
59
60
4.2.2.5 Beam Loadings
GROUND FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
B1 67.1 31.9 0 -10.9 2
B2 67.9 33.6 0 -11.2 2
B3 67.4 32.7 0 -10.9 2
B4 68.1 33.7 0 -11.2 2
B5 67.4 32.8 0 -11 2
B6 68.5 34.4 0 -11.6 2
B7 27.7 25 0 -8.38 3.21
B8 -66 47.9 4.5 -19.7 1.88
B9 -81.5 24.1 0 -12.1 1.5
B10 -82.9 24.4 3 -11.7 1.5
B11 82 23.7 3 -11.7 1.5
B12 83 24.4 0 -11.7 1.5
B13 81.9 24 3 -11.7 1.5
B14 84.3 26.2 0 -11.9 1.5
B15 27.8 16.7 5.5 -7.13 2.75
B16 -86.5 51.8 0 -27.6 2.25
B17 74.6 25.9 4.5 -53.2 2.25
B18 -69.5 33.3 2 -11.6 2
B19 -70.3 32.7 0 -10.9 2
B20 69.8 33.2 3 -11.1 1
B21 70.5 32.7 3 -10.9 1
B22 69.8 33.1 3 -11 1
B23 70.1 33.5 3 -10.5 1
B24 72.8 65.7 5.5 -28.3 2.75
B25 -67.6 48.8 0 -19.4 2.63
B26 68 88.8 0 -34.8 3.5
B27 -67.3 86.9 3 -34.3 2.5
B28 94.6 125 0 -48.7 3.5
B29 -93.9 123 6 -48.2 2.5
B30 -94.3 134 6 -50.2 2.5
B31 93.6 131 6 -49.7 2.5
B32 93.7 141 6 -50.9 2.5
B33 -93.7 141 0 -51.2 3.5
B34 -112 170 0 -64.9 2.4
B35 94.1 149 6 -52.1 2.5
B36 127 203 0 -73.6 0.3
B37 68 128 6 -41.9 2
61
SECOND FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
B1 -113 59.9 3 -45.6 0
B2 -107 57.7 3 -45.5 0
B3 103 53.6 0 -41.9 3
B4 106 56.3 0 -44.6 3
B5 104 54 0 -42.1 3
B6 108 59.5 0 -48 3
B7 53.2 49.8 0 -18.2 4.13
B8 -79 62.3 2.25 -24.124 2.06
B9 -112 4.73 3 -1.78 1.25
B10 -107 6.5 3 -2.2 1
B11 101 3.93 0 -1.76 1.5
B12 105 6.79 0 -2.38 2
B13 101 5.62 3 -1.64 1.25
B14 111 15.4 0 -7.53 3
B15 45.2 12.2 5.5 -5.96 2.75
B16 -92.2 35.8 0 -18.8 2.25
B17 78.1 31.9 4.5 -57.9 2.25
B18 -43.2 19.7 1.5 -36.9 0.375
B19 -119 57.2 0 -48.6 3
B20 -113 54.3 0 -43.2 3
B21 108 53.8 3 -42.1 0
B22 111 53.6 3 -41.9 0
B23 109 53.8 3 -42 0
B24 113 54.7 3 -38.7 0
B25 82.8 89.1 2.75 -50 0
B26 -120 83.7 0 -33.4 0
B27 96 163 0 -57.8 4
B28 -93.1 156 6 -53.4 2.5
B29 155 238 0 -88.2 3.5
B30 -150 225 6 -83.2 2.5
B31 163 259 0 -94.7 3.5
B32 ±159 249 6 -89.2 2.5
B33 154 264 0 -93.9 4
B34 ±150 257 6 -87 2.5
B35 -153 279 6 -99 2
B36 ±150 274 6 -91.5 2
B37 153 294 0 -105 4
B38 151 287 6 -95.8 2
B39 -212 372 6 -136 2
B40 -208 359 0 -121 3.5
B41 57 342 0 - -
B42 -28.5 85 6 - 1.6
B43 215 427 0 175 1.6
B44 243 416 6 -141 2.5
B45 42.4 - - -37.3 2
B46 -28.5 85.5 6 - -
62
B47 19.7 - - -41.2 2
B48 113 366 0 -155 1.6
B49 127 334 6 -122 1.5
THRD FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
B1 -73.3 45.2 3 -31.8 0
B2 -79.3 44.9 3 -42.9 0
B3 95 52.4 0 -41.6 3
B4 99.7 58.9 0 -41.8 3
B5 92.4 53.4 0 -41.2 3
B6 99.2 63.2 0 -51.7 3
B7 50.8 51 0 -19.2 4.13
B8 -72.4 59.2 2.25 -24.6 0
B9 -75.1 4.49 0 -1.71 1.5
B10 -82.8 8.07 3 -2.77 0.75
B11 93.7 4.3 0 -1.85 1.5
B12 98.3 9.14 0 -3.04 2.25
B13 90.5 8.28 3 -2.44 0.75
B14 109 25.6 0 -17.3 3
B15 42.5 12 0 -6.1 2.75
B16 -84.9 38.7 0 -19.6 2.25
B17 76.9 32.3 4.5 -58.1 2.25
B18 -44 20.5 1.5 37.3 0.375
B19 -76.5 41.2 0 -40.7 3
B20 -82.8 46.4 0 -33.6 3
B21 99.5 54.4 3 -42.3 0
B22 104 54.2 3 -42.8 0
B23 96.4 54.5 3 -42.1 0
B24 103 52.2 3 -35.3 0
B25 80 89.4 2.75 -50.5 0
B26 -111 89.2 0 -34.8 0
B27 26.4 77.6 0 -38.5 5.5
B28 -25.8 80.9 6 -31.9 0.5
B29 35 100 0 -46.1 5
B30 -34.5 105 6 -39 1
B31 105 202 0 -72.5 4
B32 -102 197 6 -66 2
B33 156 270 0 -97.4 4
B34 -150 258 6 -88.4 2.5
63
B35 -164 289 6 -105 2
B36 ±159 281 6 -94.6 2
B37 154 299 0 -107 4
B38 -150 291 6 -98.2 2
B39 -213 373 6 -139 2
B40 ±206 362 6 -121 2
B41 57 342 0 - -
B42 28.5 85.5 0 - -
B43 216 429 0 -179 1.6
B44 242 420 6 -142 2
B45 40.9 0 0 -83.2 2
B46 -28.5 85.5 6 - -
B47 20.7 - - -43 2
B48 116 369 0 -159 1.6
B49 126 340 6 -125 1.5
FOURTH FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
B1 69.9 39.6 0 -26.2 3
B2 74.5 37.8 0 -32.3 3
B3 88.1 37 0 -25.3 3
B4 97 51.4 0 -39.4 3
B5 49.4 42.2 0 -15 3.67
B6 -67 43.6 2.25 -24.4 2.25
B7 72.1 5.29 3 -1.26 1.25
B8 80.8 12.9 0 -9.39 3
B9 69.3 11.4 3 -0.083 0.75
B10 91 29.3 0 -21.2 3
B11 41.4 11.1 5.5 -6.94 2.75
B12 -79.9 42.7 0 -19.6 2.63
B13 76.1 32.4 4.5 -57.8 2.25
B14 -44.2 19.1 1.5 -36.3 0.375
B15 73.5 36.5 3 -35.5 0
B16 78.7 33 3 -24.3 0
B17 94.4 36.8 3 -24.3 0
B18 103 32.2 3 -14.8 0
B19 78.9 79.3 2.75 -50.7 0
B20 -106 80.9 0 -33.5 0
B21 26.3 95.6 0 -56.6 6
B22 -26.9 104 6 -51.7 0
B23 34.9 115 0 -59.3 5.5
64
B24 -35.8 125 6 -54.6 0
B25 -105 218 6 -77.9 2
B26 -104 219 6 -73.2 2
B27 155 263 0 -101 4
B28 -151 264 6 -83.1 2.5
B29 -223 359 6 -135 2.5
B30 -217 348 6 -123 2.5
B31 57 342 0 85.5 6
B32 28.5 85.5 0 - -
B33 216 393 0 -163 1.6
B34 -241 390 6 -138 2.5
B35 40.1 - - -33.1 2
B36 -28.5 85.5 6 - -
B37 21.5 - - -35.7 2
B38 117 323 0 -140 1.6
B39 -126 301 6 -105 1.5
FIFTH FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
B1 64.7 17.9 0 -6.48 3
B2 69 28.3 0 -20 3
B3 46.2 28.6 0 -11.7 3.21
B4 -60.8 34.1 0 -23.1 2.25
B5 67.7 53.7 0 -50.7 3
B6 41.9 23.3 0 -5.01 3.67
B7 -74.5 41.8 0 -20.66 2.63
B8 75.4 30.6 4.5 -58 2.25
B9 -44.5 15.6 1.5 -35.1 0.5
B10 70.6 19.5 3 -12.17 0
B11 78.3 7.61 0 -3.33 2.25
B12 78.1 60.1 2.75 -50.5 0
B13 -102 58.5 0 -26.2 1.38
B14 -27.4 105 6 -70.7 0
B15 -28.6 121 6 -65.6 0
B16 -36.1 34.3 0 -45.8 4
B17 -40.9 123 6 -18.2 1
B18 -166 274 6 -102 2
B19 -164 273 6 -92.1 2
B20 57 342 0 85.5 6
B21 28.5 85.5 0 - -
65
B22 217 356 0 -145 1.6
B23 -243 352 6 -134 2.5
B24 39.5 6.07 0 -28.1 2
B25 -28.5 85.5 6 - -
B26 22 1.71 0 -26.1 2
B27 119 265 0 -115 1.6
B28 -127 250 6 -85.2 2
Table 4-25: Fifth Floor Beam Loadings
ROOF DECK
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
B1 30.6 12.7 0 -5.53 2.75
B2 -55.3 47.7 0 -42.1 2.25
B3 34.6 17.4 0 -8.99 3.21
B4 -28.5 15.8 0 -5.11 3
B5 65 54.8 0 -48.5 2.75
B6 -63 36 2.25 -34.3 0
B7 -42.5 117 6 -80.7 0
B8 -40.4 125 6 -57.2 0
B9 57 342 0 - -
B10 28.5 85.5 0 - -
B11 61.9 133 0 -69.3 5
B12 -56.3 131 6 -45.4 1.5
B13 -54.1 56.1 6 -85.4 0.5
B14 -56.4 106 6 -84.5 0
B15 38.2 100 0 -47.7 5
B16 -37.5 11 6 -45.9 1
66
C12 -79.6 1120 0.738 0 - -
C13 -78.8 988 0.713 0 - -
C14 -80.9 1436 - - -0.799 0
C15 -78.5 1263 0.724 0 - -
C16 -60 2058 7.4 0 - -
C17 -115 2772 -36.2 0 - -
C18 4.76 1619 -42.8 0.66 - -
C19 -85.7 565 -81.1 0.66 - -
C20 -91.2 407 -78.5 0.66 - -
C21 -85.5 714 78.7 0 - -
C22 -84.6 623 78.8 0 - -
C23 -86.3 907 78.6 0 - -
C24 -85.3 846 78.7 0 - -
C25 -105 1240 86.4 0.66 - -
C26 -59.6 1953 78.5 0 - -
C27 -21.3 860 75.4 0 - -
67
C22 -82.2 547 97.5 0 -43.2 6
C23 -81.6 740 97.4 0 -42.8 6
C24 -81.8 771 96.7 0 -41.5 6
C25 -81.7 1068 75.3 0 -5.41 6
C26 -70.7 1715 93.5 0 -34.4 6
C27 -50.4 725 106 0 -50.6 3
68
THIRD FLOOR - FOURTH FLOOR
Column Fy Fx Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
C3 -53.5 131 42 4 -39.2 0
C4 -78.2 88.5 65.6 4 -47.9 0
C5 -59.8 293 59.5 4 -46.1 0
C6 -57.5 310 60.2 4 -47.9 0
C7 -53.8 521 61.2 4 -47.7 0
C8 -41.9 843 45.4 4 -31.9 0
C9 -12.4 414 11.4 4 - -
C12 -55.7 152 2.92 4 -2.34 0
C13 -82.2 120 7.2 4 -3.95 0
C14 -58.3 385 7.08 0 -2.17 4
C15 -85.1 374 17 4 -11 0
C16 -58.9 971 17.5 4 -23.2 0
C29 -48.6 1294 8.11 4 -8.87 0
C18 -10.8 716 34.5 0 -32.7 2
C21 -56.8 127 36.4 0 -37.9 4
C22 -82.9 82.6 -62.1 4 46.7 0
C23 -62.4 282 56.2 0 -44.8 4
C24 -59.9 302 40.9 0 -52.1 4
C25 -65.3 554 18.9 0 -8.47 4
C30 -44.7 891 0 0 0 6
C27 -11.2 384 56.8 0 -70.9 2
69
FIFTH FLOOR - ROOF DECK
Column Fy Fx Max. Positive Moment Location Max. Negative Moment Location
C7 -30.4 105 12.7 4 -5.43 0
C35 -38.9 141 12.2 4 - -
C9 0.966 93.9 39.7 0 -47 4
C16 -27.7 132 17.4 4 - -
C36 -41.6 161 - - -13.3 0
C18 -10.8 96.1 24.2 0 -17.8 2
C25 -56.1 118 54.8 4 -59.8 0
C37 -45.6 154 -148 0 - -
C27 -10.2 76.8 15.4 0 -33.1 2
70
4.2.3 Design of Concrete-Shear Wall
START
LOAD SPECIFICATIONS
END
Figure 4.32: Concrete-Shear wall Design Process
71
4.2.3.1 Design Parameters
Dead Load
Component Description Load (kPa)
Suspended Steel Channel System 0.10
Ceiling
Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Protection
0.50
and Sanitary
150 mm slab 3.54
Floor and Floor Finishes
Concrete Fill Finish (50 mm) 1.15
Interior Wall Partition 1
Hollow Concrete Masonry Units 150
2.63
Exterior Walls mm Full Grout Spacing 16.5 kN/m3
Plaster on Both Faces 0.48
Hollow Concrete Masonry Units 100
2.50
Interior Walls mm Full Grout Spacing 16.5 kN/m3
Plaster on Both Faces 0.48
Inclined Staircase Slab (150 mm) 3.54
Landing Slab 3.54
Stair Steps (Riser: 160 mm, Tread: 250
1.888
mm, Width of Step: 1.2 m)
Concrete Fill Finish (10 mm) 0.23
Live Load
Category Description Load (kPa)
Main Area 6
Light Storage Roof Deck 6
Stairs 3
Earthquake Load
Parameters Value
Seismic Importance Factor 1
Soil Profile Type Sb
Seismic Zone Factor 0.4
Seismic Source Type A
Near Source Factor Na 1.2
Near Source Factor Nv 1.6
Seismic Coefficient Ca 0.48
Seismic Coefficient Cv 0.64
72
R 6.5
Ct 0.0488
Structural Period, T 0.537 sec
73
29 Footing Service Load Combination 8 DL + LL - 0.71Ex
30 Footing Service Load Combination 9 DL + LL - 0.71Ez
31 Footing Factored Load Combination 1 1.4DL
32 Footing Factored Load Combination 2 1.2DL + 1.6LL
33 Footing Factored Load Combination 3 1.2DL + LL + Ex
34 Footing Factored Load Combination 4 1.2DL + LL + Ez
35 Footing Factored Load Combination 5 1.2DL + LL - Ex
36 Footing Factored Load Combination 6 1.2DL + LL - Ez
37 Footing Factored Load Combination 7 0.9DL + Ex
38 Footing Factored Load Combination 8 0.9DL + Ez
39 Footing Factored Load Combination 9 0.9DL - Ex
40 Footing Factored Load Combination 10 0.9DL - Ez
The following earthquake loads was used in load combinations set forth in Section 203 of the
NSCP.
E=ρ(Eh)+(Ev)
Em=(Ωo)( Eh)
For simplicity, ρ was assumed as having a value of 1.25. Vertical effects of the seismic load were
also considered by adding a value to the dead load effect by 0.5CaID. The designers also decided
not to take into account in the analysis the wind load effects because of the proximity of the
building to a major fault line (West Valley Fault). It was assumed that the governing lateral force for
the structure would be the seismic load
74
4.2.3.3 STAAD Models and Analysis
75
Figure 4.38: Dead Load Figure 4.39.1: Seismic Load Along x-axis
Figure 4.39.2: Seismic Load Along z-axis Figure 4.40: Wind Load
76
4.2.2.4 Framing Plan
77
78
79
80
81
82
4.2.3.5 Beam Loadings
GROUND FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
B1 67.3 109 -38.5
B2 -66.7 112 -38.1
B3 67.2 112 -38.6
B4 17.4 63.4 -28.2
B5 42.8 248 -184
B6 93.7 136 -51.2
B7 94.2 140 -50.6
B8 95.1 141 -51.5
B9 18 66.7 -32.8
B10 -70.8 107 -37.9
B11 -78.2 37.1 -54
B12 -67.5 111 -38.9
B13 68.1 114 -38.5
B14 68.3 114 -38.5
B15 62.7 106 -33
B16 75.2 137 -190
B17 -83.7 71.1 -33.7
B18 84.3 69.1 -33.7
B19 -111 97 -47.3
B20 112 94.7 -47.3
B21 112 95.9 -47.3
B22 113 93.4 -47.3
B23 113 93.6 -46.8
B24 -113 93.2 -47.2
B25 -125 129 -81.6
B26 114 95.3 -46.8
B27 180 63.6 -58.9
B28 133 30.5 -14.9
SECOND FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
B1 -15 225 -200
B2 -15.2 207 -193
B3 14.5 196 -184
B4 15.2 201 -191
B5 14.8 198 -185
B6 16.6 203 -196
83
B7 22.8 139 -95.7
B8 29.8 352 -238
B9 -13.7 230 -209
B10 -14.4 211 -202
B11 12.1 199 -191
B12 14.5 204 -199
B13 10.7 199 -190
B14 19.6 213 -211
B15 14.6 135 -112
B16 46.3 176 -117
B17 -81.4 33.6 -62.3
B18 -78.1 23.5 -71.4
B19 -19.8 236 -210
B20 -20.7 216 -202
B21 -18.4 205 -193
B22 20.3 210 -200
B23 18.4 207 -195
B24 21`.3 213 -203
B25 51.9 181 -62.7
B26 -76.1 387 -229
B27 -149 107 -47.4
B28 151 98.6 -47.1
B29 -206 166 -77.9
B30 211 151 -77.6
B31 -215 172 -82.3
B32 219 159 -82
B33 -206 161 -77.5
B34 210 150 -77.2
B35 207 159 -77.3
B36 210 149 -77.1
B37 -206 158 -77.6
B38 210 148 -77.4
B39 261 218 -109
B40 -268 205 -106
B41 57 342 0
B42 -28.5 85.5 0
B43 -134 242 -130
B44 302 245 -124
B45 43.3 21 0
B46 -28.5 85.5 0
B47 -210 50.9 -54.6
B48 225 60 -33
Table 4-39: Second Floor Beam Loadings
84
THIRD FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
B1 -9.01 150 -121
B2 -10 143 -159
B3 13.7 182 -173
B4 15 195 -179
B5 14.3 178 -166
B6 18 187 -180
B7 23 132 -88.3
B8 40.4 314 -227
B9 -9.42 155 -125
B10 -14 149 -166
B11 12.1 186 -183
B12 15.6 199 -187
B13 8.52 182 -178
B14 26.2 213 -206
B15 14.8 127 -105
B16 49.6 155 -98.5
B17 -82.4 29.7 -62.9
B18 -80 18 -72.4
B19 -9.52 158 -128
B20 -14.4 151 -168
B21 17.7 193 -185
B22 21.1 206 -190
B23 16.8 188 -176
B24 23.6 198 -188
B25 51.9 175 -58.9
B26 -67.7 348 -219
B27 -71.5 35.4 -14
B28 72.1 34.8 -12.5
B29 -81.1 43.1 -17.9
B30 81.6 42.7 -16.6
B31 -158 117 -52.4
B32 161 108 -51.9
B33 -208 167 -78.6
B34 213 151 -78.2
B35 216 173 -83.2
B36 220 158 -82.8
B37 -208 162 -78
B38 212 150 -77.9
B39 261 220 -111
B40 268 204 -107
B41 57 342 0
85
B42 28.5 85.5 0
B43 -225 245 -130
B44 302 244 -125
B45 43.8 19.5 0
B46 -28.5 85.5 0
B47 -221 53.3 -55.9
B48 235 55.5 -33.7
FOURTH FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
B1 7.2 158 -123
B2 9.03 141 -156
B3 13.2 174 -166
B4 18.3 190 -177
B5 22.7 133 -90.6
B6 47.6 280 201
B7 10.3 165 -128
B8 19.1 150 -169
B9 7.95 159 -124
B10 28.6 166 -185
B11 15 125 -104
B12 51.6 144 -86.9
B13 -82.6 28.5 -62.1
B14 -79.9 21 -68.7
B15 13 169 -132
B16 18.6 151 -168
B17 21.3 189 -180
B18 31.3 206 -190
B19 53.2 178 -61.9
B20 -64.9 316 -197
B21 -69.3 35.2 -13.8
B22 68.7 38.1 -12.9
B23 -79.1 42.3 -17.6
B24 78.2 46 -16.9
B25 155 116 -52.3
B26 156 112 -51.7
B27 -198 163 -79.3
B28 202 152 -77
B29 267 231 -116
B30 273 217 -112
B31 57 342 0
86
B32 28.5 85.5 0
B33 -223 246 -129
B34 298 240 -125
B35 43.5 21.6 0
B36 -28.5 85.5 0
B37 216 53.5 -51.6
B38 228 59.5 -34.1
FIFTH FLOOR
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
B1 -7.26 145 -111
B2 11.9 128 -143
B3 -21.8 127 -88.5
B4 56.6 245 -173
B5 43.9 161 -60.8
B6 18.2 132 -104
B7 52.2 132 -74
B8 -82 27.5 -61.4
B9 -78.3 22.6 -64.5
B10 14.2 159 -122
B11 30.6 143 -160
B12 56.1 176 -63.1
B13 -71.9 287 -185
B14 63.6 35.2 -14.3
B15 61.9 40 -13.2
B16 -59.2 39.4 -21.7
B17 45.7 59.8 -17.7
B18 201 173 -84.2
B19 204 170 -81.4
B20 57 342 0
B21 28.5 85.5 0
B22 -218 249 -127
B23 291 236 -126
B24 42.8 24.7 0
B25 -28.5 85.5 0
B26 204 52.1 -57.2
B27 215 62.4 -34.5
87
ROOF DECK
Beam Max. Shear Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
B1 -13.5 107 -66.8
B2 48.5 159 -136
B3 17 108 -79.4
B4 17.6 71.8 -65.8
B5 48.3 154 -44.7
B6 -44.9 195 -159
B7 58 48.7 -29.2
B8 60.5 53.3 -17.1
B9 57 342 0
B10 28.5 85.5 0
B11 -79.7 74.4 -39.7
B12 83.9 54.5 -26.1
B13 -81.5 81.6 -78
B14 -49 93.9 -78
B15 156 19.7 -11.4
B16 -131 34.3 -16.5
88
C19 529 430 0
C20 459 453 0
C21 902 0 441
C22 727 0 454
C23 155 0 440
C24 988 0 454
C25 1757 0 441
C26 2096 0 419
C27 4476 0 559
89
SECOND - THIRD FLOOR
Column Fx Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
C1 17.1 150 104
C2 31.7 265 200
C3 109 175 162
C4 181 163 159
C5 276 177 162
C6 380 179 165
C7 641 154 140
C8 699 182 201
C9 -38.5 27.9 29.7
C10 90.3 155 107
C11 117 274 207
C12 339 180 167
C13 477 167 164
C14 724 168 185
C15 742 172 167
C16 1446 147 162
C17 1745 141 128
C18 710 5.2 40.5
C19 115 159 111
C20 134 279 212
C21 326 183 171
C22 401 170 167
C23 587 171 186
C24 661 188 175
C25 1007 162 177
C26 27.2 0 3.8
C27 1187 10.8 8.53
90
C6 471 202 202
91
Fifth Floor - Roof (Column)
Column Fx Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment
C2 16.1 0 5.42
C5 16.1 0 5.42
92
4.2.1.7 Support Reactions
Member X Y Z Mx My Mz
C1 -121.506 -197.124 -12.752 -25.585 -0.387 321.352
C2 -40.838 -2.792 -7.276 -20.894 -0.387 331.281
C3 -113.066 -90.6 -6.232 -15.657 -0.387 322.391
C4 -32.199 -10.957 -2.049 -10.807 -0.387 322.344
C5 -113.559 -75.715 -0.622 -5.618 -0.387 322.33
C6 -33.963 -3.894 2.41 -0.626 -0.387 332.127
C7 -130.655 191.735 5.086 4.41 -0.387 320.226
C8 -137.519 151.697 5.372 4.375 -0.387 330.121
C9 312.7 2139.079 291.262 17.108 4.418 331.142
C10 -126.907 -196.766 -13.723 -25.465 -0.387 331.417
C11 -43.779 1.534 -5.636 -21.096 -0.387 341.649
C12 -118.179 -87.279 -6.639 -15.607 -0.387 332.491
C13 -34.968 -3.523 -0.956 -10.942 -0.387 342.734
C14 -118.94 -27.61 -0.685 -5.61 -0.387 332.392
C15 -34.696 -5.067 2.757 -0.669 -0.387 342.767
C16 -137.519 151.697 5.372 4.375 -0.387 330.121
C17 -160.787 -125.33 9.368 13.719 -0.387 327.247
C18 -141.435 328.911 5.672 22.221 -0.387 329.629
C19 -132.303 -196.409 -12.752 -25.585 -0.387 341.483
C20 -46.721 5.877 -7.276 -20.894 -0.387 352.017
C21 -123.36 -83.648 -6.232 -15.657 -0.387 342.584
C22 -37.422 -2.138 -2.0411 -10.808 -0.387 353.162
C23 -123.895 -71.472 -0.604 -5.62 -0.387 342.518
C24 -39.312 0.987 2.387 -0.623 -0.387 352.929
C25 -142.125 207 5.038 4.416 -0.387 340.274
C26 -268.891 -963.233 9.657 13.683 -0.387 324.671
C27 467.111 2229.991 -313.322 28.248 -5.859 363.533
93
4.3 Design Results
94
C22 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C23 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C24 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C25 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C26 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C27 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
COLUMN PROPERTIES
SECOND FLOOR TO THIRD FLOOR
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
Steel (tw) (bf) (tf)
Section m mm^2 (d) mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
C1 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
C2 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C3 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C4 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C5 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C6 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C7 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C8 W 12 X 190 6 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C9 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C10 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
C11 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C12 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C13 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C14 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C15 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C16 W 14 X 211 6 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C17 W 14 X 211 6 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C18 W 12 X 190 6 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C19 W 12 X 79 6 14968 314.45 11.94 306.83 18.67 241.3 118
C20 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
C21 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
C22 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C23 W 12 X 120 6 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C24 W 12 X 152 6 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C25 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C26 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C27 W 12 X 170 6 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
95
COLUMN PROPERTIES
THIRD FLOOR TO FOURTH FLOOR
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
Steel (d) (tw) (bf) (tf)
Section m mm^2 mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
C1 W 12 X 120 4 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C2 W 12 X 120 4 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C3 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C4 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C5 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C6 W 12 X 190 4 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C7 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C8 W 12 X 120 4 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C9 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C10 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C11 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C12 W 14 X 211 4 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C13 W 14 X 211 4 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C14 W 12 X 190 4 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C15 W 10 X 112 4 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
C16 W 12 X 120 4 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C17 W 12 X 120 4 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C18 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C19 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C20 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C21 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
COLUMN PROPERTIES
FOURTH FLOOR TO FIFTH FLOOR
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
Steel (d) (tw) (bf) (tf)
Section m mm^2 mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
C1 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C2 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C3 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C4 W 12 X 190 4 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C5 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C6 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C7 W 14 X 211 4 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
96
C8 W 14 X 211 4 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C9 W 12 X 190 4 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C10 W 12 X 120 4 22774 333.25 18.03 312.93 28.07 241.3 179
C11 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C12 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C13 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C14 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
COLUMN PROPERTIES
FIFTH FLOOR TO ROOF
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
Steel (d) (tw) (bf) (tf)
Section m mm^2 mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
C1 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C2 W 12 X 190 4 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C3 W 12 X 152 4 28839 348.23 22.1 316.99 35.56 241.3 226
C4 W 14 X 211 4 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C5 W 14 X 211 4 40000 399.29 24.89 401.32 39.62 285.75 314
C6 W 12 X 190 4 36000 365.25 26.92 321.82 44.07 241.3 283
C7 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C8 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
C9 W 12 X 170 4 32258 356.36 24.38 319.28 39.62 241.3 253
BEAM PROPERTIES
SECOND FLOOR
Area Web Flange Flange
Length Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
(d) (tw) (bf) (tf)
Beam Steel Section m mm^2 mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
B1 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B2 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B3 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B4 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B5 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B6 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
97
B7 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B8 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B9 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B10 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B11 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B12 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B13 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B14 W 8 X 31 3 5890 203.2 7.24 203.07 11.05 155.58 46
B15 W 10 X 88 5.5 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B16 W 8 X 67 4.5 12710 228.6 14.48 210.31 23.75 155.58 100
B17 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B18 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B19 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B20 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B21 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B22 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B23 W6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B24 W 8 X 31 3 5890 203.2 7.24 203.07 11.05 155.58 46
B25 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B26 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B27 W 8 X 58 6 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B28 W 8 X 58 6 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B29 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B30 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B31 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B32 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B33 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B34 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B35 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B36 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B37 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B38 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B39 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B40 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B41 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B42 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B43 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B44 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B45 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B46 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B47 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B48 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B49 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
98
BEAM PROPERTIES
THIRD FLOOR
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
(d) (tw) (bf) (tf)
Beam Steel Section m mm^2 mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
B1 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B2 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B3 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B4 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B5 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B6 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B7 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B8 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B9 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B10 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B11 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B12 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B13 W 4 X 13 3 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B14 W 8 X 24 3 4568 201.42 6.22 164.97 10.16 155.58 36
B15 W 10 X 77 5.5 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B16 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B17 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B18 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B19 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B20 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B21 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B22 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B23 W 6 X 20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B24 W 8 X 24 3 4568 201.42 6.22 164.97 10.16 155.58 36
B25 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B26 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B27 W 6 X 25 6 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B28 W 6 X 25 6 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B29 W 8 X 28 6 5323 204.72 7.24 165.99 11.81 155.58 42
B30 W 8 X 28 6 5323 204.72 7.24 165.99 11.81 155.58 42
B31 W 8 X 67 6 12710 228.6 14.48 210.31 23.75 155.58 100
B32 W 8 X 67 6 12710 228.6 14.48 210.31 23.75 155.58 100
B33 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B34 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B35 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
99
B36 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B37 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B38 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B39 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B40 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B41 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B42 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B43 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B44 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B45 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B46 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B47 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B48 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B49 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
BEAM PROPERTIES
FOURTH FLOOR
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
Beam Steel Section m mm^2 (d) mm (tw) mm (bf) mm (tf) mm mm kg/m
B1 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B2 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B3 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B4 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B5 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B6 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B7 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B8 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B9 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B10 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B11 W 10 X 88 5.5 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B12 W 10 X 88 4.5 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B13 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B14 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B15 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B16 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B17 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B18 W 6 X 25 3 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B19 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B20 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B21 W 6 X 25 6 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
100
B22 W 6 X 25 6 4735 162.05 8.13 154.43 11.56 120.65 37
B23 W 8 X 31 6 5890 203.2 7.24 203.07 11.05 155.58 46
B24 W 8 X 31 6 5890 203.2 7.24 203.07 11.05 155.58 46
B25 W 8 X 67 6 12710 228.6 14.48 210.31 23.75 155.58 100
B26 W 8 X 67 6 12710 228.6 14.48 210.31 23.75 155.58 100
B27 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B28 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B29 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B30 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B31 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B32 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B33 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B34 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B35 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B36 W 10 X 77 6 14581 269.24 13.46 258.83 22.1 193.68 115
B37 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B38 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B39 W 10 X 68 6 12903 264.16 11.94 257.3 19.56 193.68 101
Table 4-58: Fourth Floor Beam Properties
BEAM PROPERTIES
FIFTH FLOOR
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
(d) (tw) (bf) (tf)
Beam Steel Section m mm^2 mm mm mm mm mm kg/m
B1 W 6 X20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B2 W 6 X20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B3 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B4 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B5 W 8 X 58 6 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B6 W 10 X 88 5.5 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B7 W 10 X 45 4.5 8581 256.54 8.89 203.71 15.75 193.68 67
B8 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B9 W 8 X 48 4.5 9097 215.9 10.16 205.99 17.4 155.58 71
B10 W 6 X20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B11 W 6 X20 3 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B12 W 8 X 58 5.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B13 W 8 X 58 4.5 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B14 W 8 X 31 6 5890 203.2 7.24 203.07 11.05 155.58 46
B15 W 8 X 31 6 5890 203.2 7.24 203.07 11.05 155.58 46
101
B16 W 8 X 58 6 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B17 W 8 X 58 6 11032 222.25 12.95 208.79 20.57 155.58 86
B18 W 10 X 54 6 10194 256.29 9.4 254.76 15.62 193.68 80
B19 W 10 X 54 6 10194 256.29 9.4 254.76 15.62 193.68 80
B20 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B21 W 10 X 112 6 21226 288.54 19.18 264.54 31.75 193.68 167
B22 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B23 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B24 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B25 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B26 W 4 X 13 2 2471 105.66 7.11 103.12 8.75 69.85 19
B27 W 10 X 88 6 16710 275.34 15.37 260.73 25.15 193.68 131
B28 W 8 X 67 6 12710 228.6 14.48 210.31 23.75 155.58 100
BEAM PROPERTIES
ROOF
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
(tw
Beam Steel Section m mm^2 (d) mm ) mm (bf) mm (tf) mm mm kg/m
B1 W 6 X 20 5.5 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B2 W 6 X 20 4.5 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B3 W 8 X 35 5.5 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B4 W 6 X 20 4.5 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B5 W 6 X 20 5.5 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B6 W 6 X 20 4.5 3787 157.48 6.6 152.91 9.27 120.65 30
B7 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B8 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B9 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B10 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B11 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B12 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B13 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B14 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B15 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
B16 W 8 X 35 6 6645 206.25 7.87 203.71 12.57 155.58 52
102
BEAM PROPERTIES
STAIR BEAMS
Web Flange Flange
Length Area Depth Thickness Length Thickness T Weight
Beam Steel Section m mm^2 (d) mm (tw) mm (bf) mm (tf) mm mm kg/m
B1 W 8 X 28 6 5323 204.72 7.24 165.99 11.81 155.58 42
B2 W 8 X 28 6 5323 204.72 7.24 165.99 11.81 155.58 42
B3 W 8 X 28 6 5323 204.72 7.24 165.99 11.81 155.58 42
B4 W 8 X 28 6 5323 204.72 7.24 165.99 11.81 155.58 42
Foundation Reinforcement
Foundation Column L B D
AstX(T) AstZ(T) AstX(B) AstZ(B)
Mark Mark (m) (m) (m)
Foundation 6 C6 2 2 1.31 - - 16 mm @ 70 mm 16 mm @ 70 mm
Foundation
C10 1.7 1.7 0.76 - - 12 mm @ 65 mm 12 mm @ 65 mm
10
Foundation
C11 1.8 1.8 0.51 - - 12 mm @ 105 mm 12 mm @ 105 mm
11
103
Foundation
C12 1.9 1.9 0.76 - - 12 mm @65 mm 12 mm @65 mm
12
Foundation
C13 1.7 1.7 0.36 - - 12 mm @150 mm 12 mm @150 mm
13
Foundation
C14 1.8 1.8 0.31 - - 12 mm @175 mm 12 mm @175 mm
14
Foundation
C15 1.9 1.9 0.31 - - 16 mm @345 mm 16 mm @345 mm
15
Foundation
C16 2.6 2.6 0.56 - - 12 mm @95 mm 12 mm @95 mm
16
Foundation
C17 2 2 0.41 - - 12 mm @130 mm 12 mm @130 mm
17
Foundation
C18 2 2 0.41 - - 12 mm @130 mm 12 mm @130 mm
18
Foundation
C19 2.3 2.3 0.51 - - 22 mm @415 mm 22 mm @415 mm
19
Foundation
C20 2.4 2.4 0.86 - - 16 mm @ 110 mm 16 mm @ 110 mm
20
Foundation
C21 2.4 2.3 0.41 - - 12 mm @ 135 mm 12 mm @ 135 mm
21
Foundation
C22 1.9 1.9 0.41 - - 20 mm @ 430 mm 20 mm @ 430 mm
22
Foundation
C23 2 2 0.36 - - 16 mm @ 295 mm 16 mm @ 295 mm
23
Foundation
C24 1.8 1.8 0.36 - - 12 mm @ 145 mm 12 mm @ 145 mm
24
Foundation
C25 2.9 2.9 0.61 - - 20 mm @ 265 mm 20 mm @ 265 mm
25
Foundation
C26 2.2 2.2 0.46 - - 19 mm @ 330 mm 19 mm @ 330 mm
26
Foundation
C27 2.2 2.2 0.51 - - 12 mm @105 mm 12 mm @105 mm
27
104
4.3.1.3 Connection Designs
Base Plate
Column Section Plate Dimension Bolt Specification
W 10x112 325 mm x 325 mm x 35 mm 6 A307 Diameter 16
W 12x79 325 mm x 325 mm x 20 mm 4 A307 Diameter 16
W 12x120 350 mm x 350 mm x 30 mm 4 A307 Diameter 16
W 12x152 425 mm x 425 mm x 50 mm 6 A307 Diameter 16
W 12x170 425 mm x 425 mm x 50 mm 4 A307 Diameter 16
W 12x190 475 mm x 475 mm x 60 mm 6 A307 Diameter 16
W 14x211 575 mm x 575 mm x 60 mm 8 A307 Diameter 30
105
Moment Connections
Member Web Plate Flange Plate
Connected Plate Plate
Bolt Weld Bolt Weld
(Column- Dimension Dimension
Specification Requirement Specification Requirement
Beam) (mm) (mm)
W10x112-
120x75x10 2 A307 ∅ 20 E60 9 mm 225x208.79x10 6 A307 ∅ 24 E60 27 mm
W8x58
W12x79-
120x75x10 2 A307 ∅ 20 E110 5 mm 225x208.79x10 6 A307 ∅ 24 E110 15 mm
W8x58
W12x120-
180x75x12 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 300x258.83x12 8 A307 ∅ 24 E100 20 mm
W10x77
W10x112-
180x75x12 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 300x258.83x12 8 A307 ∅ 24 E100 20 mm
W10x77
W12x152-
180x75x13 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 270x260.73x13 6 A307 ∅ 30 E100 22 mm
W10x88
W12x120-
180x75x13 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 270x260.73x13 6 A307 ∅ 30 E100 22 mm
W10x88
W10x112-
180x75x13 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 270x260.73x13 6 A307 ∅ 30 E100 22 mm
W10x88
W12x152-
240x75x12 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 360x264.54x17 8 A307 ∅ 30 E100 28 mm
W10x112
W12x170-
240x75x12 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 360x264.54x17 8 A307 ∅ 30 E100 28 mm
W10x112
W14x211-
240x75x12 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 360x264.54x17 8 A307 ∅ 30 E100 28 mm
W10x112
W12x190-
240x75x12 3 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 360x264.54x17 8 A307 ∅ 30 E100 28 mm
W10x112
W10x112-
60x75x5 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 4 mm 80x154.43x7 2 A307 ∅ 24 E60 13 mm
W6x25
W12x79-
60x75x5 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 4 mm 80x154.43x7 2 A307 ∅ 24 E60 13 mm
W6x25
W12x120-
60x75x7 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 7 mm 120x165.99x6 3 A307 ∅ 24 E60 17 mm
W8x28
W10x112-
60x75x5 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 4 mm 120x165.99x6 3 A307 ∅ 24 E60 17 mm
W8x28
W12x120-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 270x210.31x11 8 A307 ∅ 22 E100 19 mm
W8x67
W10x112-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 270x210.31x11 8 A307 ∅ 22 E100 19 mm
W8x67
W12x120-
60x75x5 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 5 mm 140x154.43x7 4 A307 ∅ 22 E60 18 mm
W6x25
W12x152-
60x75x8 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 7 mm 140x203.07x6 4 A307 ∅ 22 E60 17 mm
W8x31
W12x120-
60x75x8 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 7 mm 140x203.07x6 4 A307 ∅ 22 E60 17 mm
W8x31
W12x152-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 11 mm 225x258.83x8 6 A307 ∅ 24 E100 14 mm
W10x77
W12x170-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 11 mm 225x258.83x8 6 A307 ∅ 24 E100 14 mm
W10x77
106
W14x211-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 11 mm 225x258.83x8 6 A307 ∅ 24 E100 14 mm
W10x77
W12x170-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 225x254.76x9 6 A307 ∅ 24 E100 15 mm
W10x54
W14x211-
120x75x12 2 A307 ∅ 20 E100 7 mm 225x254.76x9 6 A307 ∅ 24 E100 15 mm
W10x54
W12x170-
60x75x8 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 8 mm 155x203.71x7 4 A307 ∅ 24 E60 19 mm
W8x35
W14x211-
60x75x8 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 8 mm 155x203.71x7 4 A307 ∅ 24 E60 19 mm
W8x35
W12x190-
60x75x8 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 8 mm 155x203.71x7 4 A307 ∅ 24 E60 19 mm
W8x35
W12x152-
60x75x8 1 A307 ∅ 20 E60 8 mm 155x203.71x7 4 A307 ∅ 24 E60 19 mm
W8x35
Shear Connections
Member Connected (Beam- Weld Requirement
Plate Dimension (mm)
Girder) Beam Web Girder Web
W10x100-W8x58 150x100x15 E100 6 mm E100 10 mm
W10x100-W10x88 150x100x15 E100 6 mm E100 10 mm
W10x77-W8x58 150x100x12 E100 6 mm E100 8 mm
W10x77-W8x67 150x100x12 E100 6 mm E100 8 mm
W8x48-W12x96 150x100x8 E100 5 mm E100 6 mm
W8x35-W12x96 150x100x6 E100 5 mm E100 6 mm
W8x31-W12x96 150x100x6 E100 5 mm E100 6 mm
W8x31-W6x20 150x100x5 E100 5 mm E100 5 mm
W8x28-W5x16 150x100x5 E100 5 mm E100 5 mm
107
4.3.2 Concrete Design Results
108
C24 302500 0.6 550 550 25 4 400
C25 302500 0.6 550 550 25 4 400
C26 302500 0.6 550 550 25 4 400
C27 302500 0.6 550 550 25 4 400
Figure 4.52: Second Floor Column Details-A Figure 4.53: Second Floor Column Detail-B
109
C21 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
C22 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
C23 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
C24 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
C25 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
C26 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
C27 422500 6 650 650 25 4 400
Figure 4.54: Third Floor Column Details-A Figure 4.55: Third Floor Column Detail-B
110
C16 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C17 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C18 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C19 160000 4 400 400 25 4 400
C20 160000 4 400 400 25 4 400
C21 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C22 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C23 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C24 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C25 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C26 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C27 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
Figure 4.56: Fourth Floor Column Details-A Figure 4.57: Fourth Floor Column Detail-B
111
C12 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C13 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C14 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C15 160000 4 400 400 25 4 400
C16 160000 4 400 400 25 4 400
C17 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C18 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C19 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C20 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C21 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
Figure 4.58: Fifth Floor Column Details-A Figure 4.59: Fifth Floor Column Detail-B
112
C13 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
C14 302500 4 550 550 25 4 400
113
4.3.2.2 Beam Design Results
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
FLOO BEAM DIMENSION (mm) LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
R MARK L B D REBAR φ TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
LEVEL (m) (mm) (m) (mm)
B1 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B2 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B3 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B4 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B5 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B6 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B7 5.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B8 4.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B9 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B10 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B11 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B12 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B13 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B14 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B15 5.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
GF B16 4.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B17 4.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B18 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B19 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B20 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B21 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B22 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B23 3 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B24 5.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B25 4.5 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B26 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B27 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B28 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B29 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B30 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B31 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B32 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B33 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B34 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B35 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B36 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
B37 6 350 400 20 2 8 2 8 2 8
Table 4.72: Ground Floor Beam Properties
114
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATIONS:
I - 2@170 mm, REST@300 mm to Midspan
II - 3@150 mm, REST@ 300 mm to Midspan
III - 4@110 mm, 2@220 mm, REST@300 mm toMidspan
IV - 6@60 mm, 3@130 mm, 3@130 mm, REST@270 mm to
Midspan
B1 IV A
B2 IV A
B3 IV A
B4 IV A
B5 IV A
B6 IV A
B7 II A
B8 III A
B9 IV A
B10 IV A
115
B11 IV A
B12 IV A
B13 IV A
B14 IV A
B15 II A
B16 III A
GF
B17 III A
B18 IV A
B19 IV A
B20 IV A
B21 IV A
B22 IV A
B23 IV A
B24 II A
B25 III A
B26 I A
B27 I A
B28 I A
B29 I A
B30 I A
B31 I A
B32 I A
B33 I A
B34 I A
B35 I A
B36 I A
B37 I A
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
FLOO BEAM DIMENSION (mm) REBA LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
R MARK L B D Rφ TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
LEVEL (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)
B1 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B2 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B3 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B4 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B5 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B6 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B7 5.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
116
B8 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B9 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B10 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B11 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B12 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B13 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B14 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B15 5.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B16 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
2ND
B17 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B18 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B19 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B20 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B21 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B22 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B23 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B24 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B25 5.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B26 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B27 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B28 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B29 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B30 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B31 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B32 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B33 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B34 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B35 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B36 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B37 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B38 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B39 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B40 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B41 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B42 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B43 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
2ND B44 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B45 2 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B46 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B47 2 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B48 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B49 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
117
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATIONS:
V - 5@90 mm, 3@180 mm, 2@270 mm, REST@300
mm to Midspan
VI - 6@80 mm, 3@160 mm, 2@240 mm, REST@300
mm to Midspan
VII - 8@60 mm, 4@120 mm, 3@120 mm, 2@250
mm, REST@300 mm to Midspan
VIII - 11@40 mm, 6@80 mm, REST@130 mm to
Midspan
IX - 15@30 mm, REST@60 mm to Midspan
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
FLOO BEAM STIRRUPS (10 mm BARS)
R MARK CONFIGURATION TYPE
LEVEL
B1 VIII A
B2 VIII A
B3 VIII A
B4 VIII A
B5 VIII A
B6 VIII A
B7 VI A
B8 VII A
118
B9 VIII A
B10 VIII A
B11 VIII A
B12 VIII A
B13 VIII A
B14 VIII A
2ND B15 VI A
B16 VII A
B17 VIII A
B18 VIII A
B19 VIII A
B20 VIII A
B21 VIII A
B22 VIII A
B23 VIII A
B24 VIII A
B25 VI A
B26 VII A
B27 V A
B28 V A
B29 V A
B30 V A
B31 V A
B32 V A
B33 V A
B34 V A
B35 V A
B36 V A
2ND B37 V A
B38 V A
B39 V A
B40 V A
B41 V A
B42 V A
B43 V A
B44 V A
B45 IX A
B46 V A
B47 IX A
B48 V A
B49 V A
119
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
FLOO BEAM DIMENSION (mm) REBAR LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
R MARK L B D φ TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
LEVEL (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)
B1 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B2 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B3 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B4 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B5 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B6 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
3RD B7 5.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B8 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B9 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B10 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B11 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B12 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B13 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B14 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B15 5.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B16 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B17 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B18 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B19 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B20 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B21 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B22 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B23 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B24 3 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B25 5.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B26 4.5 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B27 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B28 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B29 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B30 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B31 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
3RD B32 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B33 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B34 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B35 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B36 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B37 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B38 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B39 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
120
B40 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B41 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B42 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B43 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B44 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B45 2 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B46 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B47 2 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B48 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
B49 6 450 500 25 2 8 2 8 2 8
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATIONS:
V - 5@90 mm, 3@180 mm, 2@270 mm, REST@300
mm to Midspan
VI - 6@80 mm, 3@160 mm, 2@240 mm, REST@300
mm to Midspan
VII - 8@60 mm, 4@120 mm, 3@120 mm, 2@250
mm, REST@300 mm to Midspan
VIII - 11@40 mm, 6@80 mm, REST@130 mm to
Midspan
IX - 15@30 mm, REST@60 mm to Midspan
121
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
FLOOR BEAM STIRRUPS (10 mm BARS)
LEVEL MARK CONFIGURATION TYPE
B1 VIII A
B2 VIII A
B3 VIII A
B4 VIII A
B5 VIII A
B6 VIII A
B7 VI A
B8 VII A
B9 VIII A
B10 VIII A
B11 VIII A
B12 VIII A
B13 VIII A
B14 VIII A
3RD B15 VI A
B16 VII A
B17 VIII A
B18 VIII A
B19 VIII A
B20 VIII A
B21 VIII A
B22 VIII A
B23 VIII A
B24 VIII A
B25 VI A
B26 VII A
B27 V A
B28 V A
B29 V A
B30 V A
B31 V A
B32 V A
B33 V A
B34 V A
B35 V A
B36 V A
B37 V A
B38 V A
B39 V A
B40 V A
122
B41 V A
B42 V A
B43 V A
3RD B44 V A
B45 IX A
B46 V A
B47 IX A
B48 V A
B49 V A
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
FLOO BEAM BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
R MARK DIMENSION (mm) REBAR LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
LEVEL L B D φ TO BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
(m) (mm) (mm) (mm) P
B1 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B2 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B3 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B4 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B5 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B6 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B7 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B8 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B9 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B10 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B11 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B12 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B13 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B14 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
4TH B15 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B16 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B17 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B18 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B19 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B20 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B21 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B22 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B23 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B24 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B25 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B26 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
123
B27 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B28 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B29 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B30 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B31 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
4TH
B32 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B33 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B34 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B35 2 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B36 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B37 2 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B38 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B39 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATIONS:
X- 5@100 mm, 3@200 mm, REST@300 mm to
Midspan
XI - 6@80 mm, 3@170 mm, 2@260 mm, REST@
300 mm to Midspan
XII - 7@70 mm, 4@140 mm, 3@210 mm, 2@280
mm, REST@300 mm to Midspan
XIII - 11@40 mm, 5@90 mm, REST@140 mm to
Midspan
XIV - 15@30 mm, REST@70 mm to Midspan
124
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
FLOOR BEAM STIRRUPS (10 mm BARS)
LEVEL MARK CONFIGURATION TYPE
B1 XIII A
B2 XIII A
B3 XIII A
B4 XIII A
B5 XI A
B6 XII A
B7 XIII A
B8 XIII A
B9 XIII A
B10 XIII A
B11 XI A
4TH
B12 XII A
B13 XII A
B14 XII A
B15 XIII A
B16 XIII A
B17 XIII A
B18 XIII A
B19 XI A
B20 XII A
B21 X A
B22 X A
B23 X A
B24 X A
B25 X A
B26 X A
B27 X A
B28 X A
B29 X A
B30 X A
4TH B31 X A
B32 X A
B33 X A
B34 X A
B35 XIV A
B36 X A
B37 XIV A
B38 X A
B39 X A
125
Table 4.83: Fourth Floor Beam Manual
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
FLOO BEAM DIMENSION (mm) REBA LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
R MARK L B D Rφ TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
LEVEL (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)
B1 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B2 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B3 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B4 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B5 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B6 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B7 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B8 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
5TH B9 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B10 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B11 3 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B12 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B13 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B14 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B15 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B16 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B17 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B18 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B19 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B20 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B21 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B22 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B23 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
5TH B24 2 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B25 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B26 2 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B27 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B28 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
126
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATIONS:
X- 5@100 mm, 3@200 mm, REST@300 mm to
Midspan
XI - 6@80 mm, 3@170 mm, 2@260 mm, REST@
300 mm to Midspan
XII - 7@70 mm, 4@140 mm, 3@210 mm, 2@280
mm, REST@300 mm to Midspan
XIII - 11@40 mm, 5@90 mm, REST@140 mm to
Midspan
XIV - 15@30 mm, REST@70 mm to Midspan
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
FLOOR BEAM STIRRUPS (10 mm BARS)
LEVEL MARK CONFIGURATION TYPE
B1 XIII A
B2 XIII A
B3 XI A
B4 XII A
B5 X A
B6 XI A
127
B7 XII A
B8 XII A
B9 XII A
B10 XIII A
B11 XIII A
B12 XI A
B13 XII A
B14 X A
5TH B15 X A
B16 X A
B17 X A
B18 X A
B19 X A
B20 X A
B21 X A
B22 X A
B23 X A
B24 XIV A
B25 X A
B26 XIV A
B27 X A
B28 X A
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
FLOOR BEA DIMENSION (mm) REBA LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
LEVEL M L B D Rφ TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
MAR (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)
K
B1 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B2 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B3 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B4 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B5 5.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B6 4.5 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B7 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B8 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
RD B9 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B10 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B11 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
128
B12 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B13 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B14 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B15 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
B16 6 400 500 20 2 12 2 12 2 12
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATIONS:
XV- @120 mm, 2@250 mm, REST@300 mm to
Midspan
XVI- 4@110 mm, 2@220 mm, REST@ 300 mm to
Midspan
XVII - 6@80 mm, 3@170 mm, 2@260 mm,
REST@300 mm to Midspan
129
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
FLOOR BEAM STIRRUPS (10 mm BARS)
LEVEL MARK CONFIGURATION TYPE
RD B1 XVI A
B2 XVII A
B3 XVI A
B4 XVII A
B5 XVI A
B6 XVII A
B7 XV A
B8 XV A
B9 XV A
B10 XV A
B11 XV A
B12 XV A
B13 XV A
B14 XV A
B15 XV A
B16 XV A
130
Figure 4.68: Typical Two-way Slab Detail
131
Slab Type ONE-WAY
Length (mm) 6
Width (mm) 2.75
Minimum Thickness 150
Bar Diameter (mm) 12
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar (AstX(B))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 11
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar (AstX(T))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 11
Spacing of bars 250
Temperature Bars
Bars per 1 m strip 3
Total no. of bars 8.25
Spacing of bars 330
132
Slab Type TWO-WAY
Length (mm) 6
Width (mm) 5.5
Minimum Thickness 150
Bar Diameter (mm) 12
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Short Side(AstX(B))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 22
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Short Side (AstX(T))
Bars per 1 m strip 5
Total no. of bars 28
Spacing of bars 200
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side(AstZ(B))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side (AstZ(T))
Bars per 1 m strip 5
Total no. of bars 30
Spacing of bars 200
Table 4. 94: Slab Details (e)
133
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
Table 4. 95: Slab Details (f)
134
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side (AstZ(T))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
Table 4.97: Slab Details (h)
135
Total no. of bars 14.4
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side(AstZ(B))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 18
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side (AstZ(T))
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 18
Spacing of bars 250
Table 4.99: Slab Details (j)
136
4.3.2.4 Foundation Design Results
137
Foundation Reinforcement
Foundation Column L (m) B D AstX( AstZ(T) AstX(B) AstZ(B)
Mark Mark (m) (m) T)
FI1 C3 2.15 2.15 0.305 - - 12 mm @ 180 mm 12 mm @ 180 mm
FI2 C4 2.1 2.1 0.305 - - 12 mm @ 175 mm 12 mm @ 175 mm
FI3 C5 2.35 2.35 0.355 - - 12 mm @ 155 mm 12 mm @ 155 mm
FI4 C6 2.35 3.45 0.355 - - 12 mm @ 155 mm 12 mm @ 155 mm
FI5 C7 2.7 2.7 0.405 - - 12 mm @ 125 mm 12 mm @ 120 mm
FI6 C8 3.05 3.05 0.505 - - 19 mm @ 285 mm 16 mm @ 190 mm
FI7 C9 2.7 2.7 0.405 - - 20 mm @ 420 mm 12 mm @ 125 mm
FI8 C12 2.35 2.35 0.355 - - 12 mm @ 155 mm 12 mm @ 145 mm
FI9 C13 2.3 2.3 0.355 - - 12 mm @ 150 mm 12 mm @ 150 mm
FI10 C14 2.55 2.55 0.405 - - 12 mm @ 130 mm 12 mm @ 130 mm
FI11 C15 2.5 2.5 0.405 - - 12 mm @ 120 mm 12 mm @ 115 mm
FI12 C16 3.15 3.15 0.505 - - 19 mm @ 210 mm 12 mm @ 75 mm
FI13 C17 3.45 3.1 0.555 - - 12 mm @ 70 mm 16 mm @ 130 mm
FI14 C18 3.1 3.1 0.505 - - 20 mm @ 325 mm 12 mm @ 100 mm
FI15 C21 2.4 2.4 0.305 - - 12 mm @ 170 mm 12 mm @ 170 mm
FI16 C22 2.15 2.15 0.305 - - 12 mm @ 180 mm 12 mm @ 180 mm
FI17 C23 2.35 2.35 0.355 - - 12 mm @ 155 mm 12 mm @ 155 mm
FI18 C24 2.35 2.35 0.355 - - 12 mm @ 155 mm 12 mm @ 155 mm
FI19 C25 2.8 2.8 0.455 - - 19 mm @ 325 mm 19 mm @ 325 mm
FI20 C26 3.1 3.1 0.505 - - 16 mm @ 195 mm 20 mm @ 325 mm
FI21 C27 2.75 2.75 0.455 - - 20 mm @ 365 mm 20 mm @ 365 mm
138
Figure 4.72: Foundation Details- Combined Footing (Cross-Sectional View)
Foundation Reinforcement
Foundation Column L B D AstX(T) AstZ(T) AstX(B) AstZ(B)
Mark Mark (m) (m) (m)
FC1 C1 5 2.5 1 16 @ 60mm 29 @ 50 12 @ 50 mm 12@ 55 mm
C2 mm
FC2 C10 5 2.5 1 16 @ 60mm 29 @ 50 12 @ 50 mm 12@ 55 mm
C11 mm
FC3 C19 5 2.5 1 16 @ 60mm 29 @ 50 12 @ 50 mm 12@ 55 mm
C20 mm
139
C9 490000 700 700 4 400
C10 490000 700 700 4 400
C11 490000 700 700 4 400
C12 490000 700 700 4 400
C13 490000 700 700 4 400
C14 490000 700 700 4 400
C15 490000 700 700 4 400
C16 490000 700 700 4 400
C17 490000 700 700 4 400
C18 490000 700 700 4 400
C19 490000 700 700 4 400
C20 490000 700 700 4 400
C21 490000 700 700 4 400
C22 490000 700 700 4 400
C23 490000 700 700 4 400
C24 490000 700 700 4 400
C25 490000 700 700 4 400
C26 490000 700 700 4 400
C27 490000 700 700 4 400
140
GROUND FLOOR TO SECOND FLOOR
Column Area B H No of Bars Spacing
C1 360000 600 600 4 400
C2 360000 600 600 4 400
C3 360000 600 600 4 400
C4 360000 600 600 4 400
C5 360000 600 600 4 400
C6 360000 600 600 4 400
C7 360000 600 600 4 400
C8 360000 600 600 4 400
C9 360000 600 600 4 400
C10 360000 600 600 4 400
C11 360000 600 600 4 400
C12 360000 600 600 4 400
C13 360000 600 600 4 400
C14 360000 600 600 4 400
C15 360000 600 600 4 400
C16 360000 600 600 4 400
C17 360000 600 600 4 400
C18 360000 600 600 4 400
C19 360000 600 600 4 400
C20 360000 600 600 4 400
C21 360000 600 600 4 400
C22 360000 600 600 4 400
C23 360000 600 600 4 400
C24 360000 600 600 4 400
C25 360000 600 600 4 400
C26 360000 600 600 4 400
C27 360000 600 600 4 400
141
Figure 4.74: Second Floor Column Details
142
C21 202500 500 500 4 400
C22 202500 500 500 4 400
C23 202500 500 500 4 400
C24 202500 500 500 4 400
C25 202500 500 500 4 400
C26 202500 500 500 4 400
C27 202500 500 500 4 400
143
C10 160000 500 500 4 400
C11 160000 500 500 4 400
C12 160000 500 500 4 400
C13 160000 500 500 4 400
C14 160000 500 500 4 400
C15 160000 500 500 4 400
C16 160000 500 500 4 400
C17 160000 500 500 4 400
C18 160000 500 500 4 400
C19 160000 500 500 4 400
C20 160000 500 500 4 400
C21 160000 500 500 4 400
144
C5 62500 500 500 4 400
C6 62500 500 500 4 400
C7 62500 500 500 4 400
C8 62500 500 500 4 400
C9 62500 500 500 4 400
C10 62500 500 500 4 400
C11 62500 500 500 4 400
C12 62500 500 500 4 400
C13 62500 500 500 4 400
C14 62500 500 500 4 400
145
C5 22500 500 500 4 400
146
4.3.3.2 Beam Design Results
GROUND FLOOR
STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
STIRRUPS
DIMENSION(mm) REBAR LENGTH
LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT CONFIGURATION
BEAM φ
TOTAL NUMBER
B D (mm) TOP BOT TOP BOT TOP BOT (m) TYPE
OF STIRRUPS
B1 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B2 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B3 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B4 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B5 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B6 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B7 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 5.5 II 30
B8 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 4.5 III 24
B9 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B10 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B11 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B12 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B13 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B14 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 I 24
B15 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 5.5 II 30
B16 350 450 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 4.5 III 24
B17 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 4.5 V 28
B18 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 VI 28
B19 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 VI 28
B20 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 VI 28
B21 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 VI 28
B22 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 VI 28
B23 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 VI 28
B24 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 5.5 VII 32
B25 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 4.5 V 28
B27 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B28 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B29 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B30 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B31 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B32 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B33 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B34 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B35 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B36 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
B37 300 400 25 2 4 2 4 2 4 6 VIII 30
Table 4.109: Ground Floor Beam Properties
147
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATION:
I - 7@60mm, 3@130mm, 2@200mm to Midspan
II - 3@130mm, 2@270mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
III - 4@100mm, 2@200mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
IV - 3@150mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
V - 5@90mm, 3@180mm, 2@280mm, 2@300mm, rest@300mm to Midspan
VI - 7@60mm, 4@120mm, 3@180mm to Midspan
VII - 4@120mm, 2@240mm, 2@300mm, rest@300mm to Midspan
VIII - 3@130mm, 2@270mm, 2@3000mm, rest@300mm to Midspan
148
SECOND FLOOR
BEAM BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
STIRRUPS
DIMENSION REBAR
MARK LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT CONFIGURATION
(mm) φ
LENGTH
TOTAL
(m)
NUMBER
B D (mm) TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TYPE
OF
STIRRUPS
B1 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B2 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B3 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B4 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B5 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B6 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B7 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 X 34
B8 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XI 36
B9 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B10 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B11 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B12 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B13 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B14 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B15 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 X 34
B16 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XI 36
B17 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XI 36
B18 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XI 36
B19 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B20 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B21 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B22 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B23 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B24 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 IX 40
B25 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 X 34
B26 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XI 36
B27 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B28 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B29 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B30 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B31 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B32 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B33 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
149
B34 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B35 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B36 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B37 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B38 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B39 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B40 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B41 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B42 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B43 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B44 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B45 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 XIII 44
B46 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B47 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
B48 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XII 32
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATION:
IX - 11@40mm, 5@90mm, 4@140mm to Midspan
X - 6@80mm, 3@160mm, 2@240mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to
Midspan
XI - 7@70mm, 4@140mm, 3@210mm, 2@280mm, 2@300mm to Midspan
XII - 5@100mm, 3@200mm, 2@300mm, rest@300mm to Midspan
XIII - 15@30mm, 7@70mm to Midspan
150
THIRD FLOOR
STIRRUPS
BEAM BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
LENGTH CONFIGURATION
DIMENSION REBAR (m)
MARK LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
(mm) φ
TOTAL
B D (mm) TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TYPE NUMBER
OF STIRRUPS
B1 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B2 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B3 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B4 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B5 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B6 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B7 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XV 32
B8 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XVI 30
B9 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B10 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B11 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B12 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B13 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B14 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B15 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XV 32
B16 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XVI 30
B17 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XVI 30
B18 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XVI 30
B19 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B20 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B21 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B22 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B23 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B24 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIV 32
B25 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XV 32
B26 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XVI 30
B27 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B28 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B29 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B30 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B31 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B32 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B33 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B34 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
151
B35 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B36 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B37 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B38 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B39 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B40 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B41 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B42 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B43 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B44 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B45 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 XVIII 34
B46 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B47 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
B48 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XVII 28
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATION:
XIV - 9@50mm, 5@110mm, 3@160mm to Midspan
XV - 5@100mm, 3@210mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
XVI - 6@80mm, 3@160mm, 2@250mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to
Midspan
XVII - 4@120mm, 2@240mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
XVIII - 11@40mm, 6@80mm to Midspan
152
FOURTH FLOOR
BEAM BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
STIRRUPS
DIMENSION REBAR
MARK LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT CONFIGURATION
(mm) φ LENGTH
(m) TOTAL
B D (mm) TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TYPE NUMBER OF
STIRRUPS
B1 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B2 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B3 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B4 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B5 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XX 28
B6 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXI 30
B7 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B8 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B9 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B10 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B11 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XX 28
B12 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXI 30
B13 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXI 30
B14 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXI 30
B15 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B16 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B17 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B18 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XIX 32
B19 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XX XX
B20 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXI 30
B21 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B22 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B23 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B24 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B25 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B26 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B27 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B28 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B29 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B30 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B31 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B32 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B33 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B34 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B35 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 XXIII 34
153
B36 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B37 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
B38 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXII 28
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATION:
XIX - 9@50mm, 4@110mm, 3@170mm to Midspan
XX - 4@110mm, 2@220mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
XXI - 6@80mm, 3@170mm, 2@250mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to
Midspan
XXII - 4@120mm, 2@250mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
XXIII - 11@40mm, 6@80mm to Midspan
FIFTH FLOOR
BEAM BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
STIRRUPS
DIMENSION REBAR
MARK LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT CONFIGURATION
(mm) φ LENGTH
(m) TOTAL
B D (mm) TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TYPE NUMBER OF
STIRRUPS
B1 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XXIV 32
B2 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XXIV 32
B3 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XXV 28
B4 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXVI 30
154
B5 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVII 28
B6 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XXV 28
B7 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXVI 30
B8 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXVI 30
B9 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXVI 30
B10 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XXIV 32
B11 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 XXIV 32
B12 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 5.5 XXV 28
B13 400 450 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 4.5 XXVI 30
B14 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVII 28
B15 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B16 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B17 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B18 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B19 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B20 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B21 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B22 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B23 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B24 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 XXVIX 34
B25 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B26 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
B27 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXVIII 28
STIRRUPS CONFIGURATION:
XXIV - 9@50mm, 4@110mm, 3@170mm to Midspan
XXV - 4@110mm, 2@220mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
XXVI - 6@80mm, 3@170mm, 2@250mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
XXVII - 4@120mm, 2@250mm, 2@300mm, rest @300mm to Midspan
155
Figure 4.83: Fifth Floor Beam Details
ROOF DECK
BEAM BEAM STEEL REINFORCEMENTS
LENGTH STIRRUPS
DIMENSION REBAR (m) CONFIGURATION
MARK LEFT MID SPAN RIGHT
(mm) φ
TOTAL
B D (mm) TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TYPE NUMBER OF
STIRRUPS
B1 350 400 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 5.5 XXX 32
B2 350 400 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 4.5 XXXI 32
B3 350 400 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 5.5 XXX 32
B4 350 400 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 4.5 XXXI 32
B5 350 400 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 5.5 XXX 32
B6 350 400 25 2 5 2 5 2 5 4.5 XXXI 32
B7 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B8 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B9 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B10 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B11 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B12 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B13 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B14 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B15 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
B16 400 500 25 2 6 2 6 2 6 6 XXXII 28
Table 4.119: Roof Beam Properties
156
Figure 4.84: Roof Beam Details
157
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 7
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 7
Spacing of bars 250
Bars per 1 m strip 3
Total no. of bars 4.8
Spacing of bars 330
158
Total no. of bars 9
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 9
Spacing of bars 250
Bars per 1 m strip 3
Total no. of bars 6.75
Spacing of bars 330
159
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 18
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Short Side (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 5
Total no. of bars 23
Spacing of bars 200
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side(Positive Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
160
Slab Type TWO-WAY
Length (mm) 6
Width (mm) 4.5
Minimum Thickness 150
Bar Diameter (mm) 12
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Short Side(Positive Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 18
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Short Side (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 5
Total no. of bars 23
Spacing of bars 200
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side(Positive Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 24
Spacing of bars 250
161
Total no. of bars 30
Spacing of bars 200
162
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 18
Spacing of bars 250
Main Steel Reinforcement Bar Long Side (Negative Moment)
Bars per 1 m strip 4
Total no. of bars 18
Spacing of bars 250
Length (mm) 3
Width (mm) 2
163
Total no. of bars 12
164
4.3.4.4 Foundation Design Results
165
Figure 4.87: Foundation Details-Combined Footing (Cross-Sectional View)
166
4.4 Evaluation of Trade-Offs
After evaluating all the three trade-offs, the designers have come up with the final design
estimate for the five-story vertical farming building.
Trade-offs
Special Reinforced
Special Steel Dual System with
Constraint Concrete Moment-
Moment-Resisting Ordinary Reinforced
Resisting Frame
Frame System Concrete Shear Wall
System
Economic (Cost) P 16,713,514.65 P 9,736,545.87 P 10,473,035.65
Labor
Intensiveness (No. 183 workers 229 workers 254 workers
of Laborers)
Constructability
(No. of Working 119 days 163 days 191 days
Days)
Serviceability
40.61 mm 41.3 mm 39.04 mm
(Deflection)
Based from the table above, it can be seen that the special steel moment resisting frame
system is the costliest among the three trade-offs. The difference between the trade-off with the
lowest cost (special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame system) and the highest cost is P
6,976,968.78. The computed cost of the framing system is reasonable since structural steel is
relatively costly in comparison with reinforced concrete.
For the constraint labor intensiveness, the special steel moment resisting frame system
requires the least amount of workers (183) while the special reinforced concrete moment resisting
frame system came as second (229) and the dual system with ordinary reinforced concrete shear
wall came in last (254). Special steel moment resisting frame required the least amount of workers
compared to the other trade-offs since steel members are pre ordered and erection of the columns
and beams require the aid of heavy equipment’s which are usually operated by few individuals.
The results for the number of working days showed that the special steel moment resisting
frame system can be constructed the fastest among the other trade-offs. Again, this comes as no
surprise since steel beams and column are pre ordered and does not have curing periods compared
to reinforced concrete. The special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame was constructed
faster than the dual system because of the presence of the shear wall.
The serviceability aspect of the design showed that the dual system with ordinary
reinforced concrete shear wall has the smallest lateral deflection in the column located at the fifth
floor of the structure. The special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame system came second
and the special steel moment resisting frame system was last. The values of the deflection are all
acceptable. The dual system with ordinary reinforced concrete shear wall had the smallest value
since some of the forces from the structure were passed from the frame into the shear wall. The size
of the cross section used for the columns also affected the results.
167
4.4.1 Trade-Off Assessment and Final Ranking
The results for the ability of each trade-off to satisfy the criterion were presented from the
table above. The special steel moment resisting frame system had a total ranking of 87.33%, 88.02%
for the special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame system and 83.46% for the dual system
with ordinary reinforced shear wall. The special steel moment resisting frame system had the highest
rank for the constraint labor intensiveness and constructability. The special reinforced concrete
moment resisting frame system had the highest rank for the economic constraint while the dual
system with ordinary reinforced shear wall had the highest rank for the serviceability constraint. With
this, the final ranking showed that the special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame system is
the most capable design to satisfy the different criteria provided.
By using the designers raw ranking developed by Otto and Antonsson, the designers were
able to come up with the optimum design for the five-story vertical farming building. Since the level
of importance for each criterion is purely on the subjective choice of the designer, we looked into the
effect of changing the level of importance for each constraint and its impact in choosing the final
design for the project.
168
4.5.1 Cost Sensitivity Analysis
The designers changed the level of importance of the economic constraint from the highest
value of 10 to 0, the lowest value for any of the constraints while maintaining the level of importance
for the other constraint. The results are presented graphically in the figure below and it showed that
if the economic constraint has a lower level of importance, the special steel moment resisting frame
would be selected as the best design. This only shows that the cost of the design is crucial in what
trade-off would govern as the final design for the project.
The constructability constraint was increased from a value of 0 to the maximum value of 10
while maintaining the level of importance for the other constraint. The results showed that the number
of days needed to finish the project does not have an effect in choosing the final design for the
project. The special concrete moment resisting frame system would still be the best design for the
project.
169
4.6 Design Optimization
In order to help the designers choose the final design, the design was optimized by
increasing the cost of each trade-off by a fixed percentage increment. The corresponding values are
shown in the tables and figures below.
The figures above represent the change in the number of workers when the cost allotted for
the manpower was increased by 5%, 10% and 15% respectively. It can be observed that a
percentage increase in the cost would also increase the number of laborers for each trade-off. The
results show that SMRF-Steel would still require the smallest workforce among the three trade-offs.
170
4.6.2 Economic vs. Constructability
The designers also looked into the effect of increasing the cost allotted for the manpower to
the number of working days. The cost of the manpower was the one increased since the number of
laborers directly translates to how fast the work can be done. Again, the cost was increased by 5%,
10% and 15% respectively. Six days was considered equivalent to 1 week for the project. It can be
observed that an increase in the cost allotted for the manpower will translate to a lesser number of
days for each trade-off. Still the SMRF-Steel would be constructed fastest but the trend in the graph
shows that increasing the cost does not significantly reduces the number of working days anymore.
171
4.6.3 Economic vs. Serviceability
Again the cost was increased by 5%, 10% and 15% respectively but for the material cost
only. The corresponding deflection was computed by considering the 4-meter long column in the fifth
floor as the column to be affected by the increase in material cost. For the steel, the nominal weight
of the 4-meter long column in the fifth floor was increased. The I-beam with the nearest nominal
weight to the adjusted nominal weight was considered to be the adjusted column dimension. For the
reinforced concrete beams, the amount of concrete (in cubic meter) for the 4-meter long column in
the fifth floor was increased. This produced the new cross sections for the column and was
considered as the adjusted column dimension. The dual system with shear wall still has the lowest
value for the deflection.
172
CHAPTER 5: FINAL DESIGN
The trade-offs, which focused on the framing system of the project, influenced the
constraints and the general design of the project. The economic and serviceability constraint were
given the highest level of importance in designing the vertical farm mainly because we want to design
a project that can be profitable for our target client and at the same time comply with the design
standards for a structure.
In the final evaluation of the trade-offs and its ability to satisfy the different criteria provided
by the designer, the final design for the five-story vertical farming building was chosen: The Special
Reinforced Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame System. The analysis showed that in choosing
the special reinforced concrete moment resisting frame, the cost of constructing the building would
be the lowest. For the serviceability aspect of the building, the chosen design was able to pass the
allowable beam deflection. The number of construction days and laborers needed for the project was
at par with the trade-off that ranked highest for the said constraints. This shows that the Special
Reinforced Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame System is the best choice among the other trade-offs
set by the designer.
173