Sie sind auf Seite 1von 156

Solar-powered Evaporative Air-conditioner

By

Jeffrey James Snelgar

A thesis submitted for the degree of


Bachelor of Electrical Engineering

I
II
SYNOPSIS

An evaporative air-conditioner has been constructed that can operate solely

off solar power. The air-conditioning unit is roof-mounted and designed to be

ducted to several rooms. It can operate under almost all conditions that a

conventional mains powered air-conditioner can operate, thus making it a

viable option for consumers. This thesis details the design, sizing, costing

and further possible improvements of the system.

III
Jeffrey James Snelgar

13 Market Street
Kensington, Perth WA 6151
rd
3 June 2005

Professor Dr Syed Islam


Head of Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Curtin University of Technology
Kent Street
Bentley
Perth WA 6102

Dear Sir,

I am submitting my final year thesis, as to partially satisfy the requirements


for the Bachelor of Electrical Engineering degree.

This thesis is the documentation of the design, simulation and construction of


a solar-powered evaporative air conditioning unit.

This thesis is entirely my own work outside of where acknowledgement is


given.

Yours faithfully,

_____________________

Jeffrey Snelgar

1204 5239

IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank Associate Professor William Lawrance for his support

and advice in the duration of this project.

Many thanks go to David Langridge from Solar Focus Pty Ltd for his helpful

advice and supply of a suitable air-conditioning unit for the project.

Last of all, I would like to thank Zibby Cielma and especially Russell

Wilkinson and for their invaluable assistance with the construction and testing

of the prototype, without which the project would have been far more difficult.

V
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................1
1.1 THE ENERGY CRISIS AND AIR CONDITIONING ...........................1
1.1.1 AIR-CONDITIONING DEMAND....................................................1
1.1.2 ALTERNATIVE POWER...............................................................1
1.2 SOLAR-POWERED AIR-CONDITIONING.......................................3
1.3 THESIS ORGANISATION................................................................5
2.0 EVAPORATIVE AIR-CONDITIONING.................................................7
2.1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................7
2.2 DIRECT EVAPORATIVE AIR-CONDITIONING................................8
2.3 CONSTRUCTION.............................................................................9
2.3.1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................9
2.3.2 FAN MOTOR ..............................................................................10
2.3.3 WATER PUMP............................................................................11
2.3.4 COOLING PADS.........................................................................11
2.4 ADVANTAGES...............................................................................12
2.5 DISADVANTAGES.........................................................................12
2.6 SIZING ...........................................................................................13
3.0 MOTORS AND DRIVES....................................................................15
3.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................15
3.2 PERMANENT MAGNET DC MOTORS ..........................................15
3.3 PULLEYS AND DRIVES.................................................................17
3.3.2 BELT DRIVES.............................................................................18
3.3.3 PRELOAD...................................................................................18
3.3.4 V-BELTS.....................................................................................19
3.3.5 TOOTHED-BELTS......................................................................19
3.3.6 CONSTRUCTION.......................................................................20
4.0 PHOTOVOLTAIC THEORY...............................................................21
4.1 SOLAR RADIATION.......................................................................21
4.2 ENERGY FROM THE SUN.............................................................21
4.3 HISTORY OF SOLAR POWER.......................................................23
4.4 SOLAR CELL OPERATION............................................................24
4.5 SEMICONDUCTORS.....................................................................25
4.5.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................25
4.5.2 CRYSTALLINE SILICON............................................................25
4.5.3 BAND STRUCTURE AND DOPING...........................................26
4.5.4 P-N JUNCTIONS........................................................................27
4.5.5 LIGHT ABSORBSION BY A SEMICONDUCTOR.......................29
4.6 SOLAR CELLS...............................................................................31
4.6.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................31
4.6.2 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE....................................................33
4.6.3 EFFECT OF IRRADIANCE.........................................................34
4.6.4 EFFECT OF SHUNT AND SERIES RESISTANCE....................35
5.0 STAND ALONE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS..........36
5.1 BATTERIES....................................................................................36

VI
5.1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................36
5.1.2 LEAD-ACID.................................................................................37
5.1.3 NICKEL-CADMIUM.....................................................................42
5.1.4 BATTERY EQUATION................................................................44
5.2 CHARGE REGULATOR.................................................................45
5.3 MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKERS........................................47
5.4 OPTIMUM ORIENTATION AND TILT ANGLES..............................48
5.4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................48
5.4.2 FIXED ARRAY TILTING.............................................................49
5.4.3 TRACKERS................................................................................50
6.0 SYSTEM SIZING ...............................................................................52
6.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................52
6.2 SOLAR RADIATION LEVELS.........................................................52
6.3 SYSTEM LOAD..............................................................................53
6.3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................53
6.3.2 12V SYSTEM..............................................................................53
6.3.3 24V SYSTEM..............................................................................59
7.0 SIMULATION.....................................................................................64
7.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................64
7.2 ARRAY MODEL..............................................................................64
7.3 EVAPORATIVE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM SIMULATION.....67
7.3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................67
7.3.2 INPUTS.......................................................................................67
7.3.3 BATTERY...................................................................................71
7.3.4 MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS ................................................72
7.3.5 OUTPUTS...................................................................................73
7.4 PRELIMINARY LOAD TESTING ....................................................77
7.4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................77
7.4.2 TEST ONE: 8hrs continuous operation.......................................78
7.4.3 TEST TWO: Failure of one PV....................................................79
7.4.4 TEST THREE: One cloudy day...................................................80
7.4.5 PRELIMINARY SIMULATION CONCLUSIONS..........................82
7.5 12V PROTOTYPE SYSTEM TESTING ..........................................83
7.5.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................83
7.5.2 TEST ONE: 8hrs continuous operation.......................................84
7.5.3 TEST TWO: Maximum daily usage.............................................86
7.5.4 TEST THREE: Failure of one PV................................................89
7.5.5 TEST FOUR: One cloudy day.....................................................91
7.5.6 CONCLUSIONS / FINDINGS......................................................94
8.0 PROTOTYPE MODEL.......................................................................95
8.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................95
8.2 CIRCUIT DIAGRAM .......................................................................95
8.3 SYSTEM COMPONENTS..............................................................96
8.3.1 BREEZAIR EA70 AIR-CONDITIONING UNIT............................96
8.3.2 WATER PUMP............................................................................96
8.3.3 FAN MOTOR ..............................................................................98
8.3.4 BATTERY...................................................................................99
8.3.5 SOLAR MODULES...................................................................100

VII
8.3.6 CHARGE REGULATOR...........................................................100
8.4 BELT DRIVES AND PULLEYS.....................................................101
8.4.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................101
8.4.2 PULLEY SELECTION...............................................................102
8.5 PROTOTYPE CONSTRUCTION..................................................104
8.6 FULL PROTOTYPE SYSTEM TESTING.....................................105
8.6.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................105
8.6.2 FAN SPEED..............................................................................105
8.6.3 ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE...............................................106
8.6.4 AIR SPEED AND COOLING PERFORMANCE........................107
9.0 FEASIBILITY STUDY......................................................................109
9.1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................109
9.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS............................................................109
9.2.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................109
9.2.2 12V SYSTEM............................................................................109
9.2.3 24V SYSTEM............................................................................110
9.3 SYSTEM COSTING......................................................................110
9.3.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................110
9.3.2 12V SYSTEM............................................................................110
9.3.3 24V SYSTEM............................................................................111
9.4 PAYBACK PERIOD......................................................................112
9.4.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................112
9.4.2 12V SYSTEM............................................................................113
9.4.3 24V SYSTEM............................................................................115
9.5 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ...............................................................115
9.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS....................................................116
10.0 CONCLUSION.................................................................................118
10.1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................118
10.2 SYSTEM LIMITATIONS ...............................................................118
10.2.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................118
10.2.2 BELT DRIVE LIMITATIONS..................................................118
10.2.3 TESTING LIMITATIONS.......................................................119
10.3 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY............................................................119
10.4 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT...........................................................120
10.4.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................120
10.4.2 HYBRID SYSTEM.................................................................120
10.4.3 SYSTEM VOLTAGE..............................................................120
10.4.4 BELT DRIVE .........................................................................121
10.4.5 WATER PUMP......................................................................121
10.4.6 FAN MOTOR.........................................................................122
10.4.7 FAN TYPE.............................................................................122
11.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY..............................................................................123
12.0 APPENDICES..................................................................................126
12.1 APPENDIX A................................................................................126
12.2 APPENDIX B................................................................................127
12.3 APPENDIX C................................................................................128
12.4 APPENDIX D................................................................................129

VIII
12.5 APPENDIX E................................................................................130
12.6 APPENDIX F................................................................................131
12.7 APPENDIX G................................................................................132
12.8 APPENDIX H................................................................................137
12.9 APPENDIX I..................................................................................144

IX
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1: Estimated annual sales and stock of EACs in Australia................7


Figure 2.2: The cooling effect of EAC.............................................................8
Figure 2.3: Section of a typical evaporative air-conditioner...........................10
Figure 3.1: DC Motor Torque-Speed Characteristics....................................16
Figure 3.2: Torque-speed curves for two voltages........................................16
Figure 3.3: Pulley and belt configuration.......................................................17
Figure 3.4: Preload tension on belt...............................................................19
Figure 4.1: Solar radiation in the atmosphere...............................................22
Figure 4.2: Air mass relative to the zenith angle...........................................22
Figure 4.3: Diagram of azimuth, solar elevation and zenith angle ................23
Figure 4.4: Band structure in semiconductors...............................................27
Figure 4.5: Electric currents in a p-n junction due to an external bias...........28
Figure 4.6: The diode I-V characteristic........................................................28
Figure 4.7: Current flow in external connection.............................................30
Figure 4.8: Cell IV characteristics compared to a diode................................32
Figure 4.9: IV characteristics with MPP........................................................33
Figure 4.10: The effect of temperature .........................................................34
Figure 4.11: The effect of Irradiance.............................................................34
Figure 4.12: The Effect of a series resistance...............................................35
Figure 5.1: Lead-acid battery operation........................................................38
Figure 5.2: Discharge characteristics at two different discharge rates..........40
Figure 5.3: Charging Characteristics ............................................................40
Figure 5.4: Lifespan of lead-acid batteries…………………………………………………..42
Figure 5.5: Charging and discharging characteristics for a Ni-Cad cell ........43
Figure 5.6: Typical curve of battery voltage w.r.t Battery SOC ....................45
Figure 5.7: Shunt and Series Regulators......................................................47
Figure 5.8: MPPT system configuration .......................................................48
Figure 5.9: MPPT operation on IV curve.......................................................48
Figure 5.10: Summer tilt adjustment for 32 deg latitude ...............................50
Figure 5.11:Gas-powered solar tracker.........................................................51
Figure 7.1: Single diode equivalent circuit of PV cell....................................64
Figure 7.2: Hierarchical structure of PV array model....................................65
Figure 7.3: BP280 array model showing inputs and outputs.........................66
Figure 7.4: Model Parameter menu..............................................................66
Figure 7.5: Look-up tables used as inputs in simulation...............................68
Figure 7.6: Look-up table parameter menu...................................................68
Figure 7.7: Irradiance over 96 hours.............................................................69
Figure 7.8: Ambient temperature over 96 hours ...........................................70
Figure 7.9: Load current over 96 hours.........................................................71
Figure 7.10: Battery model using battery equation .......................................72
Figure 7.11: Mathematical operators used in the Simulink simulation..........72
Figure 7.12: The outputs methods used in the Simulink simulation..............73
Figure 7.13: Scope window displaying buttons.............................................74
Figure 7.14: Cell temperature over 96 hours ................................................74
Figure 7.15: Configuration of array power output..........................................75
Figure 7.16: Configuration of battery current................................................75
Figure 7.17: Configuration of energy balance...............................................76
Figure 7.18: Configuration of equivalent energy costing...............................77

X
Figure 7.19: Battery capacity over 96 hours .................................................79
Figure 7.20: Battery capacity over 96 hours .................................................80
Figure 7.21: Irradiance graph with initial cloudy day.....................................81
Figure 7.22: Battery Capacity with cloudy day and 150Ah battery................81
Figure 7.23: Battery Capacity with cloudy day and 110Ah battery................82
Figure 7.24: Load current profile over 96 hours............................................84
Figure 7.25: Battery capacity over 96 hours .................................................85
Figure 7.25: Energy balance over 96 hours..................................................85
Figure 7.26: Total energy generated and consumed over 96 hours .............85
Figure 7.27: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours..................................86
Figure 7.28: Total energy costing over 96 hours...........................................86
Figure 7.29: Battery capacity if run for 11 hours per day..............................87
Figure 7.30: Battery capacity if run for 10 hours per day..............................87
Figure 7.31: Energy balance over 96 hours..................................................88
Figure 7.32: Total energy generated and consumed over 96 hours .............88
Figure 7.33: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours..................................88
Figure 7.34: Total energy costing over 96 hours...........................................89
Figure 7.35: Array Power over 96 hours.......................................................89
Figure 7.36: Battery capacity over 96 hours .................................................90
Figure 7.37: Energy balance over 96 hours..................................................90
Figure 7.38: Total energy generated and consumed over 96 hours .............90
Figure 7.39: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours..................................91
Figure 7.40: Total energy costing over 96 hours...........................................91
Figure 7.41: Array power over 96 hours........................................................92
Figure 7.42: Battery capacity over 96 hours .................................................92
Figure 7.43: Energy balance over 96 hours..................................................93
Figure 7.44: Total energy generated and consumed over 96 hours .............93
Figure 7.45: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours..................................93
Figure 7.46: Total energy costing over 96 hours...........................................93
Figure 8.1: Prototype system configuration...................................................95
Figure 8.2: A similar original evaporative system..........................................96
Figure 8.3: A similar centrifugal fan ..............................................................96
Figure 8.4: The original Tornado AC water pump.........................................97
Figure 8.5: The replacement Flojet 12VDC water pump...............................97
Figure 8.6: The old fan motor.......................................................................98
Figure 8.7: The new DC fan motor................................................................99
Figure 8.8: The 12V 150Ah Gel Cell Battery used in the prototype system..99
Figure 8.9: The BPSX60 60W module array...............................................100
Figure 8.10: Fan and motor pulleys connected by a V-belt drive................101
Figure 8.11: Various size pulleys tested.....................................................102
Figure 8.12: The completed prototype with air duct and “cooling pads”......104
Figure 8.13: The prototype test was run on a partially cloudy day..............105
Figure 8.14: Output air speed at different locations of the output ducting...107
Figure 9.2: Coal and CO2e emissions saved by use of solar system.........117

XI
LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1: Available Residential Evaporative Air-Conditioning Units..............9


Table 5.1: Seasonal tilt angles and adjustments for 32deg latitude..............49
Table 6.1: Monthly irradiation averages........................................................53
Table 6.2: 12V System load..........................................................................54
Table 6.3: PV module data ...........................................................................55
Table 6.4: 24V system load ..........................................................................60
Table 8.1: The effect of pulley size on load current and speed...................103
Table 9.1: Itemised costing of 12V system.................................................111
Table 9.2: Itemised costing of 24V system.................................................112

XII
1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 THE ENERGY CRISIS AND AIR CONDITIONING

1.1.1 AIR-CONDITIONING DEMAND

Air conditioners are one of the largest consumers of electricity in the

home. The main electrical utility in Perth, Western Australia is Western

Power Corporation. It is estimated by Western Power that up to 40

percent of its baseload power generation on hot days is to supply air-

conditioning demand. In recent years Western Power has failed to

meet the high electricity demand of customers on some of these

extremely hot summer days. This has caused rolling blackouts across

the metropolitan area, in which consumers were ordered to refrain

from using air-conditioning altogether. It was stated that:

“Under a special law enforced after an emergency meeting of


th
Western Power officials on 17 February 2004, people in

homes and offices must not use air-conditioners on specified

hot days. Those who do not obey the instructions face a $1000

fine. Companies face fines of up to $10,000.” (Sustainable

Population Australia Inc., 2004)

This ban covered both refrigerative and evaporative air-conditioning

systems. Due to this crisis in supply, an alternative method of

powering air-conditioning would be greatly beneficial.

1.1.2 ALTERNATIVE POWER

Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the main method of

generating electricity has been through the combustion of fossil fuels.

1
Alternative methods of generating electricity are becoming

increasingly necessary due to the over -consumption of these

resources. The level of remaining fossil fuels is declining rapidly

causing many power supply issues, whilst the detrimental effect that

their combustion is having on the environment is enormous. These

resources have now been abused to the extent where action must

now be taken to actively use alternative methods of power generation.

Fossil fuel fired generation accounts for over 50% of the annual

emissions of the principle greenhouse gases (CO 2) in Australia and

the world (Zahedi, 1998). Renewable sources of energy have the

potential to meet most of Australia’s demand of energy. Solar cells are

a clean, environmentally friendly method of producing electricity. The

extent of solar cell usage is still relatively small in comparison to fossil

fuels, but it is expected that solar power will play an important part in

supplying the electricity demand in the future.

Solar powered systems have the following benefits and advantages:

 The power is generated cleanly. There is no harmful emissions

from the production and has no impact on the environment.

 They require very little maintenance. They contain no moving

parts, reducing the problem of wear.

 They are reliable. Systems are generally designed to cope with

worst-case scenarios, such as poor sunlight for several days.

2
 They are durable. Systems are generally designed to last

between 20-30 years or longer.

 Excess power generated by the system can be sold back to the

utility grid.

 They are economically friendly, since there is no need to pay a

utility company for the power consumed.

 The operation of the system is silent.

 Power can be generated where it is required without the need

for transmission lines.

 The systems are modular and can be quickly installed.

The one major disadvantage with solar powered systems is:

 There is a large capital cost. Solar cells are relatively

expensive, making the initial outlay substantial. For a system

s u c h a s a s o l a r - p o we r e d a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g u n i t t o b e

economically feasible and to compete successfully with mains-

powered units, the costs need to be closely comparable. The

level of production would need to be high, thus reducing per-

unit costs.

1.2 SOLAR-POWERED AIR-CONDITIONING

An air-conditioning unit that is solar-powered would decrease the demand

on the electricity network, whilst simultaneously reducing power costs for

the consumer. This system would be able to operate irrespective of

3
whether Western Power has placed a ban on air-conditioning, making it

more versatile in this respect.

Whilst the high cost of energy from PV presently limits its applications,

there are still many applications for which PV provides the most

economical power supply solution. PV is also often chosen simply for its

low environmental impact. Australia has a vast domestic market of many

thousands of remote homesteads and small communities, with an

abundance of solar resources (Monsour, 2001). This poses an

opportunity to present the market with an alternative air-conditioning

product, in regions where a mains supply may not exist.

The challenge of this project was to design, simulate and construct a roof

mounted evaporative air-conditioning unit, which is powered purely by

photovoltaic cells. This unit would be ducted to more than one room

requiring a powerful, but efficient fan motor. The ability for th e

photovoltaic system to be easily mounted on any rooftop makes it ideal

for powering an air-conditioning system. A medium had to be found

between cooling output and power input, such that it was effectively

powered by solar, whilst also keeping construction costs to a minimum.

Matlab simulations were used to help size the system and to verify the

design proposal before the construction of the prototype. These

simulations further investigate the potential of the unit for further

improvements.

4
1.3 THESIS ORGANISATION

This thesis is the documentation of the design, simulation and

construction of a solar-powered evaporative air-conditioning unit.

Chapter Two explains the theory behind evaporative air-conditioning and

the principles relating to its operation.

Chapter Three briefly explains the theory of motor and drives as they are

crucial to the design of an efficient system.

Chapter Four introduces the background theory behind photovoltaics.

This chapter helps explain the basis behind solar technology that will be

used for this system.

Chapter Five describes the types of stand alone components required for

a system such as a solar-powered air-conditioner to operate.

Chapter Six displays the calculations and procedure required in order to

size a photovoltaic system such as the evaporative air-conditioner.

Chapter Seven contains documentation of the simulations that were

performed to test the system design prior to implementation. It documents

the results of several different performance scenarios which could occur.

Furthermore, it documents the simulation of the prototype system under

5
similar scenarios. It also includes a brief explanation of the simulation

tools that were utilised in the Matlab Simulink software.

Chapter Eight documents construction, testing and results of the

prototype air-conditioner.

Chapter Nine discusses the feasibility of the photovoltaic system. It delves

into the setup cost of the system and its effective usability.

Chapter Ten details conclusions that have been derived from the

construction of the system and comments on further developments and

improvements that are possible.

6
2.0 EVAPORATIVE AIR-CONDITIONING

2.1 INTRODUCTION

Evaporative air-conditioning (EAC) is used widely in Australia, the south-

western United States, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, Eastern

Africa, and northern Mexico. As these locations suggest, EAC works best

for comfort in locations that are hot and dry, and is best suited to arid and

semi-arid regions of the world. EAC is excellent for cooling applications

as well as commercial applications such as in schools, libraries, offices,

greenhouses, buses, laundries, warehouses, factories, kitchens, and

poultry houses (Bom, G., et al, 1999). EAC has significant environmental

benefits over refrigerative air-conditioning due to the reduction in CFC

and HCFC use, whilst preventing the emission of CO2 and other gases.

EACs also reduce the peak electrical demand since they are more energy

efficient than refrigerative units. Energy savings due to the use of EACs

are in the tens of millions of barrels of oil per year (Bom et al, 1999).

Figure 2.1: Estimated annual sales and stock of EACs in


Australia (Mark Ellis and Associates)

Evaporative air-conditioning harnesses the cooling effect on air due to the

evaporation of water. There are two common methods of evaporative air-

conditioning. These are direct and indirect cooling. Dartnell (2005) states

that with direct cooling, water evaporates directly into the airstream. It

therefore humidifies the air and reduces its dry bulb temperature. Indirect

cooling utilises a heat exchanger, whereby incoming air is cooled with no

7
moisture added to the supply air. Only one side of the heat exchanger is

cooled with the evaporating water. Since the unit constructed in this

project utilises direct cooling, only this method will be discussed further.

2.2 DIRECT EVAPORATIVE AIR-CONDITIONING

Direct EAC is the oldest, simplest, and most widespread form of air-

conditioning. They consume significantly less energy than refrigerative

air-conditioning systems since they only consist of a small water pump

and a fan motor. The performance of an EAC is dependant upon the wet-

bulb and dry-bulb temperatures of the location. The Office of Energy

Efficiency & Renewable Energy (2005) defines the wet-bulb temperature

is the temperature to which air will cool when water is evaporated into

unsaturated air. The dry-bulb temperature is the ambient temperature of

the location. Both of these are used to compute the relative humidity. The

actual savings will vary with the humidity and dry-bulb temperature of the

location. Savings over refrigerative units of 60-80% are typical in regions

that boast low humidity (Bom et al, 1999).

Figure 2.2: The cooling effect of EAC

8
The system uses a fan to draw hot outside air through a cooling pad

made from a porous material and then into the dwelling. Heat is

absorbed by the water as it evaporates from the cooling pads, resulting in

cooler air exiting the fan. The efficiency of the unit is heavily reliant on the

materials the cooling pads are constructed from and the fan that is used.

A critical component in EAC is the use of water. The amount of water that

is used by EACs depends on the size of the unit, ambient temperature,

relative humidity, and operating hours. An average to large residential unit

typically consumes between 5 and 100 litres a day (Bom et al, 1999),

which equates to around $20 to $25 worth of water per season (Breezair,

2004).

Table 2.1: Available Residential Evaporative Air-Conditioning Units


Type Space to be cooled Installation Capacities

Portable 1 room Window 15-40m3/min

In room 1 room Free Standing 15-40m3/min

Fixed 1 room Window 20-100m3/min

Two rooms 2 rooms Window 20-160m3/min

Home Whole house Rooftop or through wall 80-300m3/min

2.3 CONSTRUCTION

2.3.1 INTRODUCTION

Residential EACs typically consist of a cubical box of sheet metal or

plastic containing large vertical filter "pads," an electric-motor-driven

fan, a water pump, a water distribution system, and a water sump at

the base (Bom et al, 1999).

9
Figure 2.3: Section of a typical evaporative air-conditioner

As shown in the figure above, the fan draws warm outside air through

the wetted cooling pad, cooling the air. The water is pumped from the

sump through the distribution system to the top of the pads. It then

trickles down through the cooling pads by means of gravity and back

into the water sump. Since water is lost through evaporation, the water

level in the sump is maintained by use of a float valve. The cooled air

is delivered either directly through a grille into a single room or into a

duct distribution system. The cool air flows into the room/s displacing

the hot air. The room temperature can be controlled by adjusting the

fan speed, and hence the airflow into the room (Blanchard, 2003).

2.3.2 FAN MOTOR

The motors for most residential air-conditioners are two-speed, single-

phase, shaded-pole or four-pole induction motors. Variable speed

10
motors are also becoming more commonly used. They generally

range from 200 to 1000W. These motors should have a drip proof

construction due to the moist conditions in which they operate.

2.3.3 WATER PUMP

Most evaporative air-conditioners have a small submerged centrifugal

pump. The capacity is generally less than 20L/min with a head of

approximately lm. This pump runs continuously whilst the system in

running, and therefore a bleed/overflow valve is necessary to maintain

correct water level in the sump.

2.3.4 COOLING PADS

In the past, the most common type of cooling media was pads made

from "aspen". These were wood fibres packed together loosely that

allow air to pass through them. This was generally packed into 50mm

thick slabs within a cloth mesh and held together with a wire mesh

frame. The cooling efficiency of these pads was only about 50% and is

considered relatively poor. Slabs of expanded paper are also used to

make cooling pads. This type also has a low efficiency of about 50%.

These types of pads also have a random water flow pattern and only a

short useful life (Premier Industries Inc, 2005). There are now new

synthetic pads in the market that offer efficiencies around 90% and are

longer lasting than their predecessors. The higher the wetting ability

the cooling pad possesses, the higher the possible efficiency of the

air-conditioner.

11
2.4 ADVANTAGES

There are many benefits of evaporative air-conditioning as stated by Bom

(1999, p. 2), and some of these are as follows:

 Substantial energy and cost savings.

 No chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) usage.

 Reduced peak demand.

 Reduced CO2 and power plant emissions.

 Improved indoor air quality.

 Life-cycle cost effectiveness.

 Easily integrated into built-up systems.

 Wide variety of packages available.

 Significant local fabrication and employment.

 Provide humidification when needed

 Easy to use with direct digital control (DDC)

 Greater regional energy independence

2.5 DISADVANTAGES

EAC also has a few disadvantages over refrigerative air-conditioning

units. These are:

 They cannot be used in regions of high humidity.

 They use water, a scarce resource in some regions of the

world.

12
 Damage can occur to rooftops if proper maintenance is not

carried out to eliminate the problem of concentrated salts in the

overflow water.

 Use of systems at high speed can result in noisy airflow.

 Dust and pollen can be introduced to the residence through the

air-conditioner causing problems for allergy sufferers.

 Cooling pads must be cleaned and/or replaced annually to

prevent growth of dangerous micro-organisms that can cause

health problems.

2.6 SIZING

The capacity of an air-conditioner is given by the air displacement in

m3/min. Bom (1999) states that the general rule when sizing a system is

to provide a change in air between one and four times every four minutes.

This rate is dependant on the wet-bulb temperatures. The higher the wet-

bulb temperature, the more air change is required to maintain a

“comfortable” room temperature. The saturation efficiency of the unit also

varies the air change requirement. A higher efficiency requires less air

change. Building features also influence this variable. For instance, a

room with a large window area, high sun exposure and poor insulation

would require one air change every minute. However a well insulated,

shaded room with a single window which would only require air change

every four minutes. The other cases are obviously in between these

extremes

13
The following are recommended air change rates for different wet-bulb

temperatures by Bom (1999) to ensure “comfortable” cooling:

15.5C WB = One air change every 5 to 2 minutes

17C WB = One air change every 4.5 to 2 minutes

18C WB = One air change every 4.25 to 2 minutes

19C WB = One air change every 4 to 2 minutes

20C WB = One air change every 3.75 to 2 minutes

21C WB = One air change every 3.5 to 2 minutes

For wet-bulb temperatures greater than 21C, the EAC may not be able to

provide “comfortable” cooling, but rather “relief” cooling. The air change

rates required are as follows:

22C WB = One air change every 3.25 to 2 minutes

23C WB = One air change every 3 to 2 minutes

24C WB = One air change every 2.5 to 2 minutes

The air-conditioner must be sized according to the characteristics of the

dwelling and the temperature and humidity characteristics of the location

in order for it to perform acceptably.

14
3.0 MOTORS AND DRIVES

3.1 INTRODUCTION

The correct utilisation of electrical motors and drives is essential to the

performance of a system since it is the conversion of electrical power into

mechanical power. By maximising the efficiency of this conversion, the

system will operate have optimum performance. This chapter details the

operating characteristics of DC motors and the theory behind pulleys and

belt-drives.

3.2 PERMANENT MAGNET DC MOTORS

Permanent magnet DC motors are most useful where the required size is

less than 0.1 horsepower (74.6W), however they are more suitable for

applications where limiting power consumption is crucial. Permanent

magnet motors generally run cooler since there is no stator coil to

consume power. They are easily reversed by changing the polarity of the

voltage applied to the terminals. They are capable of high-stall torque and

function perfectly in long-duty cycle applications. Dynamic braking is

easily obtained by simply applying a short circuit to the motor terminals

after voltage is removed. The torque -speed characteristics of a

permanent magnet DC motor is shown in the figure below.

15
Figure 3.1: DC Motor Torque-Speed Characteristics

Each curve is a theoretical straight line since the permanent magnet field

and armature winding are constant in a given motor (Globe Motors,

2005). Furthermore, current varies in proportion to torque. The no load

speed varies inversely with field strength and the stall torque varies

directly with field strength. No load speed changes proportionally to

voltage, resulting in a family of parallel speed-torque curves. The voltage

determines the speed, and only torque will determine the current.

Figure 3.2: Torque-speed curves for two voltages

The operating speed can be calculated, based on the rated voltage and

actual voltage. The operating speed of a DC motor is linearly proportional

16
to the voltage applied to its terminals. For example, a DC motor that is

rated at 30VDC and 2000rpm, but operated at 12V will have an operating

speed of,

Voperating
noperating  nrated
Vrated

12V
noperating  2000 800rpm
30V

3.3 PULLEYS AND DRIVES

3.3.1 PULLEY RATIO

Pulleys are particularly useful for altering the speed at which the

driven shaft is rotating. The drive shaft speed can either be reduced

or increased by utilising suitably sized pulleys. The pulley ratio

equation is,

Motor pulley radius


Ratiopulley 
Load pulley radius

The speed relationship between two pulley sizes is,

Speedmotor
Speedload 
Ratiopulley

Figure 3.3: Pulley and belt configuration

As well as speed variation, the torque on the motor can also be

manipulated by careful sizing of the pulleys. Torque is a force applied

17
by a moment arm. In the case of a pulley, the length of the moment

arm is the radius. Therefore the torque is directly proportional to the

size of the pulley. If the load remains constant, but the pulley size

increases, the torque required to be supplied by the motor also

increases. Therefore a trade-off between torque and speed is crucial

to the design of an efficient belt drive system.

3.3.2 BELT DRIVES

Belt drives are one of the main methods of transmitting power in

machinery. They are useful when the speed of the driven shaft is

different from that of the driver shaft and when there is a distance

between the shafts.

3.3.3 PRELOAD

A belt drive requires residual tension in the "loose" span of the belt in

order to operate properly. This can never be allowed to get near zero

otherwise the belt drive will not function properly. To counter this

problem a static "preload" is established in the spans of the belt. This

is unlike chain drives that actually have loose spans. In V-belt drives,

the preload maintains the contact force between the belt and the

surface of the pulley so that friction can transmit the power. In tooth-

belt drives, the preload maintains the correct contact pattern between

the belt teeth and sprocket grooves. This is required to keep the teeth

f rom attempting to climb up the sides of the grooves in t he

sprockets. Preload can be established by means of adjusting the

18
centre-line distance between the pulleys or by using an idler which

imposes a side load on one of the spans. V-belt drives usually require

greater preloads than tooth-belt drives.

Figure 3.4: Preload tension on belt (EPI Inc, 2004)

3.3.4 V-BELTS

The transmission of force from a pulley to a V-belt depends on friction

between the belt and the pulley. The friction force between the belt

and the pulley depends on the size of the normal force between the

belt and the pulley; the coefficient of friction between the belt and the

pulley; and the arc of contact between the belt and the pulley. The

frictional force between two objects is the product of the coefficient of

friction and the normal force. The coefficient of friction is independent

of the shape of the belt, but the normal force between the belt and

sides of the pulley sheave depends on the angle between the sheave

sides and the tension on the belt.

3.3.5 TOOTHED-BELTS

In a static toothed-belt drive, the required preload is determined by the

number of teeth engaged on the driving sprocket, the diameter of the

19
s p r o c k e t , t h e m a xi m u m t o r q u e t o b e t r a n s m i t t e d , a n d t h e

recommended tension ratio.

3.3.6 CONSTRUCTION

Reinforced rubber flat belts of cordless construction can be made of

multiple layers of rubber-impregnated canvas. The fabric provides

strength, while the rubber gives a good coefficient of friction. Corded

construction rubber flat belts have better stretch resistance than plied

construction and can operate on smaller-diameter pulleys.

20
4.0 PHOTOVOLTAIC THEORY

4.1 SOLAR RADIATION

Careful assessment of the solar radiation at the site where the PV system

is to be implemented is crucial to the success of the design. Solar

radiation data is required to be analysed and processed before an

accurate estimate of available solar radiation can be found.

4.2 ENERGY FROM THE SUN

Irradiance is the total power from a radiant source falling on a unit area.

The average energy that strikes the Earth’s surface perpendicular to the

sun is known as the “solar constant”:


2
S = 1367W/m

However, not all of this energy reaches the Earth’s surface due to

scattering and absorption by air molecules, clouds and particulate matter

(aerosols). The energy that reaches the surface in a direct line from the

sun is known as the direct radiation. The scattered portion is known as

diffuse radiation. Some radiation can reach the receiver after it has

reflected from the ground, known as albedo. The total radiation of these

three components is known as global radiation.

21
Figure 4.1: Solar radiation in the atmosphere (Markvart, 2000)

The amount of radiation that reaches the ground is highly variable due to

yearly variations, the motion of the sun, climatic conditions, composition

of the atmosphere. The effect of atmosphere is characterized by air mass,

which is relative to the beam path length through the atmosphere.

Figure 4.2: Air mass relative to the zenith angle (Markvart,


2000)

An air mass of 1 (AM1) exists when it is a clear day at sea level and the

sun is at zenith. At most times, the sun is at an angle relative to zenith, z,

and will result in an air mass greater than 1. The standard air mass for

22
calibrating photovoltaic modules is AM1.5, since this is a typical solar

spectrum on the Earth’s surface on a clear day.

Due to the Earth’s rotation around the sun in an elliptic orbit, and its

apparent motion is at an angle of 23.35 degrees relative to the celestial

equator, the motion of the sun can be pictured as following this path

across the sky at this angle relative to the Earth’s equator.

Figure 4.3: Diagram of azimuth, solar elevation and zenith


angle (Markvart, 2000)

4.3 HISTORY OF SOLAR POWER

Energy from the sun has been used to generate electricity since 1861,

when a French mathematics teacher Augustin Mouchot patented a

machine which used sunlight to evaporate water, using the steam to run a

small engine (ThinkQuest, 2005). Since then, vast developments have

been made in this field resulting in the photovoltaic solar cells produced

today.

23
The discovery of the first photovoltaic effect in a liquid electrolyte was by

French scientist, Edmund Becquerel in 1839 (Monsour, 2001, p. 3).

Zahedi (1998) states that photovoltaic is the conversion of light directly

into electricity through a semiconductor material. It derives its name from

“photo” meaning light, and “voltaic” referring to electricity and voltage.

This effect was also observed in a solid-state device made of selenium in

1876. However, the first silicon cell was not produced until 1941, followed

by the first cell of similar structure to modern day cells in 1954, which was

6% efficient.

The first application for photovoltaics was as power sources for satellites

during the late 1950’s and 1960’s. A large amount of development

occurred in the 1970’s resulting in the volume of cells increasing and

reduced production costs. These costs continued to reduce during the

1980’s with the significant development of cells of greater size and

efficiency. The 1990’s featured a continued increase in the size of

commercially available cells, thus resulting in cells of higher power

ratings. A maximum cell efficiency greater than 30% has been

demonstrated in a laboratory, however commercially available cells are

still around half that figure, ranging from 13-16%.

4.4 SOLAR CELL OPERATION

Solar cell operation is based on the ability of semiconductors to convert

sunlight directly into electricity by the use of the photovoltaic effect. This

process involves the incident energy of the light creating mobile charged

24
particles in the semiconductor, which are then separated by the device

structure resulting in an electrical current.

There are many different solar cells commercially available, with many

more under development. The range spans different materials and

structures, which have been produced in the aim of extracting maximum

power from device, whilst simultaneously keeping costs to a minimum.

4.5 SEMICONDUCTORS

4.5.1 INTRODUCTION

P h o t o vo lt a i c c e l l s a r e p r o d u c e d f ro m m a t e r i a l s k n o wn a s

semiconductors. These materials have special electrical properties in

that they are somewhere between good conductors like metals, and

insulators such as glass or plastics. Silicon (Si) is the most commonly

used semiconductor for the manufacture of photovoltaics, but others

such as cadmium telluride and copper indium diselenide are still being

investigated for future uses. Crystalline Silicon is used for electronic

devices such as transistors, diodes and integrated circuits in the form

of “chips”. Crystalline silicon PV cells are essentially made from large

“chips” to create what is called wafers.

4.5.2 CRYSTALLINE SILICON

Crystalline silicon is the most commonly used semiconductor due to its

predictable, reliable, and uniform behaviour. It is however, the most

expensive type of silicon due to the slow and careful manufacturing

25
processes required (Markvart, 2000). Crystalline cells have a

relatively good power efficiency compared to other semiconductor

materials.

4.5.3 BAND STRUCTURE AND DOPING

The structure of silicon crystals is a diamond lattice structure, whereby

each atom has four its four nearest neighbours at the vertices of a

tetrahedron. This structure results in a bonding arrangement that

utilises the four outer valence electrons. Each bond contains two

electrons and all of the valence electrons are taken up by these

bonds. Most other semiconductors have similar arrangements.

Quantum theory states that the energy of an electron must fall within

certain well-defined bands. The electrons which form the bonds of the

lattice structure are in the energy band known as the valence band

(EV). The next highest band is known as the conduction band (E C).

This is separated from the valence band by what is known as a

bandgap (EG).

EG = EC - EV

26
Figure 4.4: Band structure in semiconductors

A pure semiconductor, referred to as intrinsic, contains just the right

number of electrons to fill the valence band and the conduction band

is empty. Electrons cannot move from the full valence band because

of their bond. However, if a semiconductor is alloyed with an impurity

in a process called doping, carriers are introduced into the conduction

band or removed from the valence band. Impurities such as

phosphorous, a group 5 impurity atom, are commonly used with

silicon, which promotes one electron from each impurity atom to the

conduction band. These impurity atoms are therefore called donors.

Electrons in the conduction band are mobile and the crystal becomes

a conductor. This is called an n-type semiconductor since the current

is carried by negatively charged electrons. Doping with a group 3 atom

such as boron, known as acceptors caused an electron deficiency in

the valence band. These missing electrons are referred to as holes.

They are mobile in the valence band, carrying current by positively

charged electrons and called a p-type semiconductor.

4.5.4 P-N JUNCTIONS

The principle of solar cell operation is based on the formation of a

junction between a p-type and an n-type semiconductor. This

combination creates a p-n junction diode. At this junction, a strong

electric field exists. The mobile n -type carriers in the donor

semiconductor diffuse into the acceptor semiconductor and fill the

holes that existed, resulting in practically no mobile charge carriers.

27
The banding is in equilibrium, and there is no current flow through the

junction.

Figure 4.5: Electric currents in a p-n junction due to an


external bias (Markvart, 2000)

However if an external voltage is applied to each side of the p -n

junction, a bias is created resulting in an alteration in the height of the

potential barrier between the two junctions. A forward bias results from

a positive voltage being applied to the p-side, reducing the potential

barrier, and thus causing a dramatic increase in the current through

the junction. On the other hand, a reverse bias causes an increase in

the potential barrier and only a tiny current is allowed to flow. This is

referred to as the dark saturation current.

Figure 4.6: The diode I-V characteristic

The I-V characteristics of a diode are given by the Shockley equation:

28
 qV  
I I0 exp 1
 kT  

where I is the current, I 0 is the dark saturation current, k is the


-23
Boltzmann constant (1.4 x 10 ), q is the magnitude of the electron
-19
charge (1.6 x 10 ), and T is the absolute temperature.

4.5.5 LIGHT ABSORBSION BY A SEMICONDUCTOR

Energy conversion via the photovoltaic effect relies on the quantum

nature of light. Light can be perceived as a flux of particles - photons -

which carry energy. Their energy is equal to:

hc
E ph () 

where h is the Planck constant, c is the speed of light and  is the

wavelength of light. The energy of a photon is therefore proportional to

its wavelength. Only photons with energy greater than the bandgap

can be converted into electricity by the solar cell. When a photon is

absorbed by the semiconductor, it may cause an electron to be

promoted from the valence band into the conduction band. A hole is

then left in the valance band and an extra carrier exists in the

conduction band, causing electron -hole pairs. The majority of

electrons promoted have energies exceeding the bandgap energy.

Immediately after the electron is promoted, the electron and hole

decay to states near the edges of the their respective bands. As these

shift, energy is lost as heat and therefore cannot be converted to

electrical power. This is one of the largest power losses in the

conversion process.

29
Figure 4.7: Current flow in external connection

If an external current path is provided from the n-side to the p-side,

then the junction will try to regain equilibrium by transmitting an

electron along the connection to the p-side to refill the hole left from

the displaced electron. This results in a net current and voltage to exist

between the two sides of the junction. Neglecting losses, each photon

co n t rib u te s on e e le ct r o n ch a rge t o th e ge n e ra t ed cu rre n t .


17
Approximately 4.4 x 10 photons strike a square centimeter of the

Earth’s surface every second on a clear day (Markvart, 2000). The

electric current generated due to the light is equal to

Il qNA

where N is the number of electrons with energies greater than the

bandgap, and A is the surface area of the semiconductor that is

exposed to light.

The maximum voltage that the semiconductor can produce is the

same as its bandgap energy in electronvolts as seen in the equation,

V Eg / q

30
4.6 SOLAR CELLS

4.6.1 INTRODUCTION

The electrical current produced by the semiconductor is extracted by

means of contacts at both the front and back of the cell. At the front

they are spaced widely and are made from very thin strips of metal to

allow the maximum amount of light to reach the semiconductor

surface. The current collected by these strips is then distributed to

larger conductors, known as bus bars. These then connect in

combination with other cells to form a module with two output

terminals.

The generation current of the cell due to light, Il can be represented

by a diode in parallel to a current source. The diode represents the

current through the p-n junction and the output current is therefore the

difference between the two current flows.

 qV  
I I lIo exp 1
 kT  

The effect that illumination has on the cell can be seen in the IV

characteristics of the cell compared to a diode. The IV curve is shifted

into the negative region of the graph by the illumination current. This

is where the current is extracted from the cell.

31
Figure 4.8: Cell IV characteristics compared to a diode

For a given irradiance and temperature and cell size, there are two

limiting factors of output. These are the short-circuit current and open-

circuit voltage. The short-circuit current, I SC is the maximum output

current and this occur when the voltage is zero. In an ideal cell, when

the voltage is zero, the short-circuit current would be the light

generated current, I l . ISC is directly proportional to the irradiation

levels. The open-circuit voltage, VOC is a maximum when the current

is zero, and increases logarithmically with increased irradiation. When

I=0,

kT  Il 
VOC  ln
 O 1
q I 

Maximum power output is achieved where the product of I and V are a

maximum. The fill factor, FF, is denoted by

Pmax Vm Im FFVOC ISC

where Vm and Im are the voltage and current at the maximum power

point. The quality of the solar cell can be referred to by the value of

32
the fill factor. The higher the fill factor is, the higher the quality of the

cell.

Figure 4.9: IV characteristics with MPP

A solar cell’s efficiency,, is the maximum power output of the cell at

standard test conditions, divided by the power of irradiation that strikes


2
it. These are an irradiance of 1000W/m , an air mass of AM1.5, and a

temperature of 25 degrees Celsius.

4.6.2 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE

Since solar cells do not normally operate under standard conditions,

the effect of the ambient temperature around the cell must be allowed

for as it will affect its output characteristics. Temperature has a

significant effect on the output power of a solar cell. The most

affected factor is that of the voltage which decreases as the

temperature rises. This is typically around 2.3mV per degree Celsius.

The affect temperature has on the current can be considered

negligible.

33
Figure 4.10: The effect of temperature

4.6.3 EFFECT OF IRRADIANCE

The output power of a solar cell is dependant on the irradiance which

strikes it. As irradiance increases, the current becomes

proportionately higher. The short-circuit current is directly proportional

to the irradiance, and as can be seen in the diagram below, has a

significant effect on the maximum power output.

Figure 4.11: The effect of Irradiance

34
4.6.4 EFFECT OF SHUNT AND SERIES RESISTANCE

A series and shunt resistance exists inside solar cells. This resistance

is unwanted as it decreases the fill factor of the cell. A series

resistance is caused by the physical connection of the semiconductor

to the metallic contacts and other interconnections. A shunt

resistance is caused by impurities in the p-n junction which causes a

partial shorting of the junction. Their effects are shown in the IV

characteristics below.

Figure 4.12: The Effect of a series resistance

35
5.0 STAND ALONE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS

5.1 BATTERIES

5.1.1 INTRODUCTION

Solar modules are devices that can be utilised to generate power from

sunlight; however, they have no means of storing power. Sunlight is

only available for part of a day, and so the power output of solar

modules are severely limited. Even during daylight hours, the sun’s

irradiation levels can vary quite dramatically due to atmospheric

conditions and so the power output is not constant. In many

applications, electricity may be required in times when there is no

output from the solar cells, such as at night time. Energy storage

devices are therefore necessary in the PV system. Since a PV system

is generally setup to power a specific load, the energy storage device

can be sized accordingly, and the type of storage can be chosen. The

storage device should be sized such that it will cope with several

contingencies. It should be capable of supplying energy even if the

load is temporarily increased, or if the energy being supplied to the

load is varying. Electrochemical storage batteries are commonly used

d u e t o th e ir e xce lle n t sto ra ge cap a b ilit ie s a lo n g wit h t he ir

transportability, and modularity. These batteries operate on the

principle of converting electrical energy into chemical energy.

Solar systems generally use deep cycle batteries because they are

designed to be heavily discharged over a long period of time whilst

also being recharged many times. The depth of discharge (DOD) is a

36
crucial factor when determining the size of a battery required for a

system. The DOD in a deep cycle battery should not fall below 60-

70% to prevent a significant decrease in battery life. These batteries

are rated in Ampere-hours (Ah) and generally also include a discharge

rate. This is usually 20 or 100 hours and a current rating is given at

this length of discharge. A battery of 100Ah can be discharged at 10A

for 10 hours or 5A for 20 hours, and so on.

There are several different types of electrochemical storage batteries,

however the two most commonly used in PV system is lead-acid

batteries and Nickel-cadmium. Since these are the most common,

they will be discussed in further detail.

5.1.2 LEAD-ACID

5.1.2.1 INTRODUCTION

A lead-acid battery is made up of two electrodes of lead (Pb) and

lead dioxide (PbO2), and an electrolyte of sulphuric acid (H 2SO4)

which is diluted in water. The lead is positioned in the battery to

provide the largest surface area possible, such that it maximises

the amount of chemical reactions the lead can achieved with the

electrolyte. The positive plate is made from the lead oxide and the

negative from the lead. Two chemical reactions are created which

form the basis of how the battery works.

37
As can it can be seen from the chemical equations, during charge

Lead-Oxide, Lead and sulfuric acid is formed. The lead-oxide

forms at the anode, pure lead at the cathode and the sulphuric acid

is released back into the electrolyte. Upon discharge, lead

sulphate forms at both electrodes and th e sulphuric acid is

removed form the electrolyte.

Figure 5.1: Lead-acid battery operation (Markvart, 2000)

5.1.2.2 LEAD PLATE TYPES

Pure lead plates are used where low discharge is required and

deep cycle operations are only expected occasionally. Pure lead

has a long life span; however, they must be handled carefully due

to the soft nature of the plates. They are easily broken if care is

not taken.

Lead calcium plates are used where the battery is not frequently

deeply discharged. The life span of is slightly less than that of pure

lead plates. However, due to the doping of calcium they are not

38
only cheaper, but also much stronger and less susceptible to

damage.

Lead antimony plates are made from lead doped with antimony.

Similar to calcium, this also decreases the cost and adds strength

to the plates. However, they degrade rapidly when discharged

deeply, and thus require to be almost fully charged all of the time.

These type of batteries are not used in PV systems for this these

reasons.

5.1.2.3 CYCLING

The life span of a lead acid battery is greatly affected by the cycling

characteristics of the system. These must be accounted for when

designing a system. At low states of charge, sulphation can occur,

a process whereby lead sulphate forms on the plates. This

reduces the efficiency of the battery as it decreases the amount of

chemical reactions that can take place. If the discharge level is

kept below 50%, the concentration of sulphuric acid is kept at an

acceptable level and this process can be prevented.

Overcharging the battery can also cause damage to the battery

and can be a safety hazard. The reason for this is what is known

as gassing. This is a process whereby hydrogen and oxygen are

created at the electrodes and should be prevented. It results in

more maintenance being required for the battery. The voltage

39
characteristics for charging and discharging are shown in the

figures below.

Figure 5.2: Discharge characteristics at two different discharge


rates (Markvart, 2000)

Figure 5.3: Charging Characteristics (Markvart, 2000)

Methods of controlling a regulating the charge and discharge must

therefore be put in place in a system containing a lead acid battery.

A high voltage disconnect (HVD) and low voltage disconnect (LVD)

are used to prevent the battery from damage.

5.1.2.4 ADVANTAGES

 They are easy to manufacture and relatively inexpensive.

40
 When maintained and used properly, are long lasting and

durable.

 Self discharge is relatively low compared to other battery

options.

 They have no memory.

 They require very little maintenance, since electrolytes need

only be filled on unsealed batteries.

 They are capable of high discharge rates.

5.1.2.5 LIMITATIONS

 They cannot be left in an uncharged state. Damage will

result if the cell voltage drops below 2.1V.

 Full discharge is limited to only a few times and frequent

deep cycling is not recommended.

 They are inherently environmentally unfriendly due to their

construction of lead and electrolyte.

 They have a low energy density. They are quite heavy for

the amount of charge that they can store.

5.1.2.6 BATTERY LIFE

The life span of lead-acid batteries is highly dependent on the

depth of discharge. Deep-cycle batteries are designed to cope

with a DOD typically between 30 and 70% and have a life span of

5 to 6 years. In comparison, regular car batteries are not designed

41
for such large discharge characteristics and a deep discharge will

drastically reduce the lifespan of the battery.

Figure 5.4: Lifespan of lead-acid batteries (Photovoltaic systems)

5.1.3 NICKEL-CADMIUM

5.1.3.1 INTRODUCTION

Nickel-cadmium batteries are made from nickel hydrate (NiOH),

Cadmium (Cd), and potassium hydroxide (KOH). The positive

plate is made from the nickel hydrate; the negative is from the

cadmium, whilst an aqueous potassium hydroxide forms the

electrolyte. The chemical reactions that are created are as follows

(Arizona Solar Center, 2005).

The life of Nickel-cadmium batteries varies with the application in

which they are used and the environment which they must operate.

The life of these batteries decreases with decreased discharge

depth. Unlike lead-acid batteries, nickel-cadmium batteries can be

42
overcharged and fully discharged over considerable time without

damage to the cells. The charging and discharging characteristics

are shown below.

Figure 5.5: Charging and discharging characteristics for a Ni-


Cad cell

5.1.3.2 ADVANTAGES

 They are capable of a high number of charge/discharge

cycles. If maintained correctly, they are capable of up to

1000 cycles.

 They are fast and simple to charge, even after lengthy

storage.

 They have a long shelf life since they are not affected by

self discharge.

43
 They have a low cost per cycle compared to other batteries.

5.1.3.3 LIMITATIONS

 They have a relatively low energy density.

 Unlike lead-acid batteries, they have a memory effect. They

must be regularly charged and discharged to prevent this.

 They have a relatively high self discharge rate. Recharging

will be required after storage.

 They are inherently environmentally unfriendly since nickel-

cadmium contains toxic metals.

5.1.4 BATTERY EQUATION

The characteristic behaviour of a typical 12V battery can be

approximated by linear equations. The battery state-of-charge (SOC)

is the percentage of the available capacity (Ah) referred to the

maximum battery capacity (Ah). The battery voltage can be

approximated by the following equation:

Capacitymax (Ah) Cbatt (Ah)


Vbatt 13.5V  2V
Capacitymax (Ah)

44
Figure 5.6: Typical curve of battery voltage w.r.t Battery
SOC (Lawrance, 2005)

5.2 CHARGE REGULATOR

Charge regulators are used for the purpose of regulating current flow from

the solar panels for the purpose of protecting the battery in a system

against excessive discharge or overcharge. Overcharging causes

gassing and loss of electrolyte, and can result in damage to the battery.

The device disconnects the load from the battery if the voltage drops

below a pre-set minimum. The load is not reconnected until the voltage

has risen significantly past the pre-set value. The purpose of this process

is to ensure that the battery has a chance to recharge before the load is

reconnected, thus extending its lifespan. Charge regulators are given an

Ampere rating so allowing them to be suitably sized for their application.

The charge regulator also limits the maximum voltage that is supplied by

the PV modules to charge the battery. This is to prevent overcharging of

the battery as well as excessive gassing. A limit on the charging current

is not necessary for most systems unless there is a vast contrast in size

between array and the battery capacity. Therefore the voltage regulation

45
that is required can be achieved by use of either a shunt or series

regulator.

Series regulators have a variable resistance in series with the PV arrays

and battery. As the battery is being charged and the battery voltage

increases, the resistance value is increased. This reduces the battery

voltage and current. Since the voltage across the resistor is only small

when the battery is charged, the power loss is quite small.

A shunt regulator also has a variable resistance; however it is connected

in parallel with the battery and PV array. However, this combination may

cause larger power losses since as the resistance is reduced, more

current from the PV array is diverted through the resistor and less through

the battery. For both types, the variable resistance element is generally a

MOSFET transistor.

46
Figure 5.7: Shunt and Series Regulators

5.3 MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKERS

A maximum power point tracker (MPPT) is a device that ensures that the

output of a PV module is at the maximum possible. This enables the

system to harness as much energy from the PV as possible. Maximum

power output is achieved when the load resistance is matched with the

source resistance. The device is effectively a DC-DC converter which

controls the output of the PV by controlling the load resistance. A MPPT

in a system allows it to optimise output power during varying irradiation

and temperature. The voltage transformation performed by a MPPT is

shown below.

Vout  PMAX R

47
Figure 5.8: MPPT system configuration (Lawrance, 2005)

Figure 5.9: MPPT operation on IV curve (Lawrance, 2005)

5.4 OPTIMUM ORIENTATION AND TILT ANGLES

5.4.1 INTRODUCTION

The orientation of the photovoltaic array with respect to the sun

determines the intensity of the sunlight falling on the modules. The

system power output is therefore dependant upon this. The azimuth

angle and the tilt angle are two variables that need to be considered

when designing a system. The tilt angle is the angle between the

plane of the module and the horizontal. The azimuth angle is the

angle between the plane of the module and the shortest line to the

equator from the position. This is due n orth for the southern

hemisphere and due south for the northern hemisphere. The tilt angle

chosen should provide maximum power output from the system. This

48
is obtained when the array tilt angle is roughly equal to the latitude

angle. However, this varies seasonally due to the change in angle of

the sun’s path across the sky. The tilt angle can be fixed at a certain

angle all year round or seasonally changed, depending on the

necessity for maximum power output.

5.4.2 FIXED ARRAY TILTING

The system to be powered by PV modules will only be run during

summer months and so a tilt angle that maximises power output

during this time will be chosen. Perth is situated at latitude 31.830S

and longitude 116.70N. Ordinarily, a tilt angle of 32 degrees would be

chosen to give a maximum annual power output. However, since the

system will only be used in summer, the seasonal tilt adjustment of -10

degrees can be factored in. The resultant tilt angle is 22 degrees, as

can be seen in the table below.

Table 5.1: Seasonal tilt angles and adjustments for 32deg latitude
Site
Season Latitude Adjustment Tilt Angle
Summer 32 deg -10 deg 22 deg
Autumn 32 deg 0 deg 32 deg
Winter 32 deg +15 deg 47 deg
Spring 32 deg 0 deg 32 deg

49
Figure 5.10: Summer tilt adjustment for 32 deg latitude

This is the case the tilt angle of the photovoltaic array is fixed all year

round.

5.4.3 TRACKERS

A major issue problem encountered in the design of solar systems is

the issue of harnessing as much energy from the sun as possible.

Modules may be in fixed positions, or they may be designed to

continually follow the motion of the sun. Most arrays are fixed at a

specific tilt angle, whilst facing the equator. This option is the most

economical installation as it requires no moving parts and the

mounting structure is simple. However, the output of the cells is not

optimal since the maximum sunlight is not captured.

Tracking of the sun is particularly important in systems that need to

operate under concentrated sunlight. The use of a two-axis tracker

can increase the output of an array by up to 40%. This varies the tilt

angle based on the time of year and the inclination of the Sun’s path

50
across the sky, whilst also tracking it during the day from East to West.

A single-axis tracker only tracks the sun across the sky at a set tilt

angle and therefore must be manually altered at regular intervals of

the year in order to maintain a high output. This method yields almost

the same output as that of the two-axis system. Automatic systems

are available that consume no power to operate as they function on

the basis of a gas system. The Sun’s warmth causes the motion of

Freon gas from one vessel to another via a small pipe. This

proportionally changes the weight of each side of the array that is

mounted on a pivot, resulting in a movement that tracks the sun.

When the sun rises at dawn, the resultant warmth causes the module

to flip back to its starting position for another day of tracking. These

systems are quite expensive relative to a stationary system and

therefore the benefits of the extra output must be weighed against the

costs. For this reason, fixed arrays are more commonly used for solar

systems.

Figure 5.11:Gas-powered solar tracker

51
6.0 SYSTEM SIZING

6.1 INTRODUCTION

For a stand-alone PV system, the sizing of components is crucial to the

design. The capital cost of solar system is the largest component when

pricing solar electricity. The capital cost has a direct influence on the

effective cost of electricity that it produces. It is therefore important that

the correct size components are used to minimise the overall capital cost.

The initial information required for the suitable sizing of a PV system is as

follows:

 The solar radiation levels in the proposed site.

 The load profile.

 The importance of supply continuity.

 The economic constraints of the project.

From this information, an assessment on the correct PV sizing and

battery sizing can be achieved.

The following details the sizing of the solar evaporative air-conditioner for

two different system configurations. Firstly, a 12V system will be sized.

This has been implemented in the prototype built. Secondly, a 24V

system will be sized, due to the recommendations from the result of the

12V prototype test, which will be discussed in a later chapter.

6.2 SOLAR RADIATION LEVELS

The radiation levels will be based those of Perth, Western Australia.

52
The total average irradiation on an inclined plane at plane angle of 20

degrees and plane azimuth of 0 degrees for summer months is required.

The monthly averages for the summer months are as follows:

Table 6.1: Monthly irradiation averages


Ave. Daily Total
Month Irradiation (MJ/m2)
December 28.6
January 28.7
February 26.9

Therefore the average total daily irradiation for summer will be,

Dec Jan Feb 28.6 28.7 26.9 2


Esummer,ave   28.1MJ / m
3 3

6.3 SYSTEM LOAD

6.3.1 INTRODUCTION

The load is the combination of load currents from the electrical devices

in the system. In the case of the evaporative air-conditioner, the loads

are in parallel with the battery and can therefore be added to yield a

total system load. The load will be run for an average of 8 hours per

day.

6.3.2 12V SYSTEM

6.3.2.1 SYSTEM LOAD

The loads of the system are listed in the following table.

53
Table 6.2: 12V System load
PART QTY CURRENT (A) POWER (W)
Flojet water pump 1 1.3 15.6
EMP Fan motor 1 8.7 104.4
Totals: 10.0 120.0

The total power consumption of the load must be determined. This

can be found from the power equation:

Pdc Vdc Idc

If the average voltage of the battery under load is assumed to be

12V,

Vbatt Vdc 12.0V

The total power consumed is therefore,

Pconsumed 10.0 12.0 120.0W

Furthermore,

Energy Power Time

So if the system is run for eight hours per day, the total energy

consumed will be,

Econsumed 120.0 8 960.0Whrs / day

Therefore, the system must accommodate 960Whrs per day.

6.3.2.2 PV SIZING

A decision must be made, as to what size and type of PV modules

are most suitable to the system. The prototype will be tested using

BPSX60, 60W modules. Therefore the number of these that are

required will be determined. Also, a more cost effective sizing, by

means of other PV modules will be shown. However, if larger

54
modules are used, they have much higher Vmax voltages, since

they generally have 72 cells instead of 36 and they would require a

DC-DC converter. This would add extra cost to the system, and so

more of the smaller modules are a more economically viable option

for this system. The data for several modules sizes is shown

below.

Table 6.3: PV module data


Effective
Module Pmax Cells Voc Isc Vmax Imax solar surface
2
(W) (V) (A) (V) (A) LxW (m )
BPSX60 60 36 21 3.87 16.8 3.56 1.070x0.467
BP380 80 36 22.1 4.8 17.6 4.55 1.125x0.500

BPSX60

The number of BPSX60, PV modules required can be calculated

as follows.

The PV module surface area must be determined. This is the

amount of actual solar cell exposed to sunlight.

Area Length Width

Therefore for a BPSX60 PV module,

AreaPV 1.070 0.467 0.500m


2

The BPSX60 PV module output power is,

PPV max 60W

2
The power produced by 1m of BPSX60 PV module is,

PPV max 60 2
PPV,1m2   120.00W / m
AreaPV 0.500

The efficiency of the PV module can then be determined,

55
ElectricalPowerOutput
 100%
SolarPowerStrikingCell

120.00
 100% 12.0%
1000

Therefore the PV module is 12.0% efficient.

2
The electrical energy that is produced by 1m of BPSX60 at 12.0%

efficiency is,

EPV 28.112.0% 3.372MJ / m / day


2

Converted to kWhr from MJ,

3.372 1000 2
EPV  0.937kWhr / m / day
3600
2
Hence 1m of BPSX60 PV modules will produce
2
0.937kWhr/m /day of power. Therefore one panel will produce,

EBPSX 60 0.937 0.500 0.468kWhr / module / day

Since the air-conditioner load is 960Whrs/day, the number of

modules required can be found to be,

960
No  2.05
468

Therefore either two BPSX60 modules could be used with is

required. Therefore either 2 or 3 BPSX60 modules could be used

to power the system. Two modules would limit the system to being

run for slightly less than full 8 hours per day, and would be a more

economical option. However, if a third module was purchased, the

extent of usage would be substantially increased since the array

56
power would be greater than required. The decision is ultimately a

cost versus power requirement issue.

BP380

Alternatively, BP380 80W cells could be used. They will be sized

in the same fashion to determine the number of modules required.

The PV module surface area must be determined. This is the

amount of actual solar cell exposed to sunlight.

Area Length Width

Therefore for a BP380 PV module,

AreaPV 1.125 0.500 0.562m


2

The BP380 PV module output power is,

PPV max 80W

2
The power produced by 1m of BP380 PV module is,

PPV max 80 2
PPV,1m2   142.22W / m
AreaPV 0.562

The efficiency of the PV module can then be determined,

ElectricalPowerOutput
 100%
SolarPowerStrikingCell

142.22
 100% 14.22%
1000

Therefore the PV module is 14.22% efficient.


2
The electrical energy that is produced by 1m of BP380 at 14.22%

efficiency is,

EPV 28.114.22% 3.996MJ / m / day


2

57
Converted from MJ to kWhr,

3.996 1000 2
EPV  1.110kWhr / m / day
3600
2 2
Hence 1m of BP380 PV modules will produce 1.110kWhr/m /day

of power. Therefore one panel will produce,

EBPSX 60 1.110 0.562 0.624kWhr / module / day

Since the air-conditioner load is 960Whrs/day, the number of

modules required can be found to be,

960
No  1.54
624

Therefore a minimum of 2 BP380 modules is required.

6.3.2.3 BATTERY SIZING

A suitably sized battery must be found that can effectively run the

system, but without being too oversized. The following calculations

are used to determine a suitable battery size for the system.

The total Ampere-hours used by the system are required to be

determined.

Wh / day 960
Ah / day   80.0Ah / day
Vsystem 12

The number of days of autonomy that the system requires is 1 day.

It is not expected that there will often be two consecutive cloudy

days during the summer months in Perth, and so sizing for only

one day is acceptable.

58
Therefore the amount of ampere-hours the system is required to

store is,

Ah 80.0Ah 1day 80.0Ah

To avoid over draining the battery, the depth of discharge is limited

to 60%. Therefore the capacity required is,

80.0
Capacity  133.33Ah
0.6

A gel cell 12V 150Ah battery has therefore been chosen for the

system.

From this sizing method it can be seen that a 12V evaporative air-

conditioning system will consist of a 12V Flojet water pump, a

250W 30VDC EMP fan motor, a 150Ah 12V gel cell deep cycle

battery, and either three BPSX60 60W or two BP380 80W PV

modules.

6.3.3 24V SYSTEM

6.3.3.1 SYSTEM LOAD

The tot al po we r con sumpt io n of t he loa d mu st a ga in be

determined, since the power that will be consumed will be greater

than that of the 12V system. Several assumptions are made about

the system:

 Two 12V batteries will be used to in series to create the 24V

supply.

 The 30VDC motor will draw on average 8.7A as it did in the

12V system, however, it will operate at a faster rpm.

59
 The 12V Flojet pump could be powered from one of the 12V

batteries; however a 24V pump would be more suitable to

the higher output air-conditioning system. This would also

allow higher water circulation.

Table 6.4: 24V system load


PART QTY CURRENT (A) POWER (W)
Shurflo water pump 1 1.6 38.4
EMP Fan motor 1 8.7 208.8
Totals: 10.3 247.2

The total power consumed by the system can be found as follows:

Pdc Vdc Idc

If the average output voltage of the batteries under load is

assumed to be 24.0V,

Vbatt Vdc 24.0V

The total power consumed is therefore,

Pconsumed 10.324.0 247.20W

Furthermore,

Energy Power Time

So if the system is run for eight hours per day, the total energy

consumed will be,

Econsumed 247.20 8 1977.60Whrs / day

Therefore, the system must accommodate 1977.60Whrs per day.

60
6.3.3.2 PV SIZING

BPSX60

The number of BPSX60, PV modules required can be calculated

as follows.

From the previous calculations, one BPSX60 PV module will

produce,

EBPSX 60 0.937 0.500 0.468kWhr / module / day

Since the air-conditioner load is 1977.60Whrs/day, the number of

modules required can be found to be,

1977.60
No  4.23
468

Therefore a minimum of 5 BPSX60 modules is required.

BP380

Alternatively, BP380 80W cells could be used. They will be sized

in the same fashion to determine the number of modules required.

From the previous calculations, one BP380 PV module will

produce,

EBPSX 60 1.110 0.562 0.624kWhr / module / day

Since the air-conditioner load is 1977.60Whrs/day, the number of

modules required can be found to be,

1977.60
No  3.17
624

61
Therefore either 3 or 4 BP380 modules could be used to power the

system. Three modules would limit the system to being run for

slightly less than full 8 hours per day, and would be a more

economical option. However, if a fourth module was purchased,

the extent of usage would be substantially increased since the

array power would be greater than required. The decision is

ultimately a cost versus power requirement issue.

6.3.3.3 BATTERY SIZING

Two suitably sized batteries must be found that can effectively run

the system, but without being too oversized. The following

calculations are used to determine suitable battery sizes for the

system:

The total Ampere-hours used by the system are required to be

determined.

Wh / day 1977.60
Ah / day   82.4Ah / day
Vsystem 24

The number of days of autonomy that the system requires is 1 day.

It is not expected that there will often be two consecutive cloudy

days during the summer months in Perth, and so sizing for only

one day is acceptable.

Therefore the amount of ampere-hours the system is required to

store is,

Ah 82.4Ah 1day 82.4Ah

62
To avoid over draining the batteries, the depth of discharge is

limited to 60%. Therefore the total capacity required to be stored

in the two batteries is,

82.4
Capacity  137.33Ah
0.6

Since the batteries are in series, the current will be the same in

each battery. Therefore each of the batteries must be rated at a

minimum of 137.33Ah. Two gel cell 12V 150Ah batteries have

therefore been chosen for the system.

From this sizing method it can be seen that a 24V evaporative air-

conditioning system will consist of a 24V Shurflo water pump, a

250W 30VDC EMP fan motor, two 150Ah 12V gel cell deep cycle

batteries, and either five BPSX60 60W or four BP380 80W PV

modules.

63
7.0 SIMULATION

7.1 INTRODUCTION

Matlab Simulink software was utilised for the simulation of the solar -

powered evaporative air-conditioner. A model was built based on a

representation of the BP 280 PV array. From this system model, many

tests could be run to assess the performance of the system in different

scenarios. Preliminary tests could be run to assist in the selection of a

suitably sized pump and fan motor. Furthermore, the model could be

used to simulate the operating characteristics of the prototype once the

components had been sized. The unit could be tested under differing set-

up characteristics as well as worse-case scenarios to view the potential of

the system. The schematic diagram of the simulated system can be

viewed in Appendix F.

7.2 ARRAY MODEL

A model for a BP280 PV array has been developed for the purpose of

simulating PV systems by Wenham et al., in 1995. The model is based

on the single diode equivalent circuit of a PV cell. This circuit is shown in

the figure below.

Figure 7.1: Single diode equivalent circuit of PV cell (Lawrance


and Wichert, 1994)

64
The model is broken down into a hierarchical structure that consists of all

the equations that exist in a PV cell. The governing equation for this

model is,

IC = ISC GN + IT (TC – TR) – ID – (VC + IC RS)/RSH

Where, IC = load current (A)


VC = load voltage (V)
ISC = short circuit current at STC (A)
GN = normalized radiation (W/m2)
IT = short circuit current temp. coef. (A/K)
TC = cell temp (K)
TR = cell reference temp (K)
ID = diode current (A)
RS = series resistance ()
RSH = shunt resistance ()

MS MP
Model Inputs Model Outputs
G Tc

Ta PV ARRAY
VPVA IPVA

Level 1
G, Ta , VPVM IPVM, Tc

NS
PV MODULE
NP

Level 2
G, Ta , VPVC IPVC, Tc

RS
PV CELL
RSH

ILG,Tc ID Level 3
G, Ta VPVC, IPVC, Tc
T RS
r Ior
I Calculation of Calculation of Tr
SCR I I
LG D EG
It A

Level 4
G, Ta Tc

NOCT Calculation of
Tc

Level 5

Figure 7.2: Hierarchical structure of PV array model (Lawrance


and Wichert, 1994)

65
The inputs to this equation are also a resultant of other input variables

that are consistent with the BP280 module, and the array formation

characteristics. The resultant level one hierarchical model can then be

utilised in the Simulink software to simulate various parallel and series

combinations of BP280 modules, as shown in the figure below.

Figure 7.3: BP280 array model showing inputs and outputs


(Lawrance and Wichert, 1994)

Variation of the number of series and parallel cells that form the module

can also be performed. These can be altered in the model’s parameter

menu as shown in the figure below.

Figure 7.4: Model Parameter menu

66
7.3 EVAPORATIVE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM SIMULATION

7.3.1 INTRODUCTION

The prototype was powered with BPSX60 60W PV modules. However

the array model available is based on a BP280 80W PV module.

Therefore, the number of cells in parallel would be required to be

altered to achieve the desired PV array output. For instance, a 240W

array can be simulated by using three 80W modules, whilst an 180W

array can be simulated by entering 2.25 as the number of parallel

modules. There will be a negligible difference in output power

characteristics of the simulation model, thus making it a very flexible

model.

7.3.2 INPUTS

7.3.2.1 INTRODUCTION

Look-up Tables

The system simulations were run over a period of four days or 96

hours. The inputs were based on hourly averages, and therefore

there were 96 different values for each input. These values were

entered into the simulation by means of a “direct look-up table”.

These are an nxD sized table, where n is the number of samples

and D is the table dimension. An nx1 table was used to implement

the hourly samples. In order to match up one hourly input with

another corresponding input, clocks were utilised to step through

all the samples sequentially.

67
Figure 7.5: Look-up tables used as inputs in simulation

Figure 7.6: Look-up table parameter menu

7.3.2.2 IRRADIANCE

The irradiance data was gathered from actual measurements of

Perth’s irradiation on a summer day and can be seen in Appendix

G. The values are averaged hourly and are in Watts per square

metre. The data has been used four times to represent four

68
consecutive fine days. As will be seen later, this data was also

manipulated in order to simulate days of poor sunlight.

Look-up table input data

[0 0 0 0 0 108 548 752 879 935 976 990 1004 1001 988 947 843
674 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 548 752 879 935 976 990 1004
1001 988 947 843 674 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 548 752 879
935 976 990 1004 1001 988 947 843 674 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
108 548 752 879 935 976 990 1004 1001 988 947 843 674 208 0
0 0 0 0]

Figure 7.7: Irradiance over 96 hours

7.3.2.3 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE

The ambient temperature data was gathered f rom actual

measurements of Perth’s ambient temperature on a summer day.

The values are averaged hourly and are in degrees Kelvin. The

data has been used four times to represent four consecutive days

with similar temperature.

69
Look-up table input data

[294.1 293.4 292.1 290.9 289.6 288.8 288.6 290.1 292.3 295.6
298.8 300.8 302.4 304.0 304.2 303.3 302.1 301.1 300.0 298.9
297.8 296.6 295.7 294.8 294.1 293.4 292.1 290.9 289.6 288.8
288.6 290.1 292.3 295.6 298.8 300.8 302.4 304.0 304.2 303.3
302.1 301.1 300.0 298.9 297.8 296.6 295.7 294.8 294.1 293.4
292.1 290.9 289.6 288.8 288.6 290.1 292.3 295.6 298.8 300.8
302.4 304.0 304.2 303.3 302.1 301.1 300.0 298.9 297.8 296.6
295.7 294.8 294.1 293.4 292.1 290.9 289.6 288.8 288.6 290.1
292.3 295.6 298.8 300.8 302.4 304.0 304.2 303.3 302.1 301.1
300.0 298.9 297.8 296.6 295.7 294.8]

Figure 7.8: Ambient temperature over 96 hours

7.3.2.4 LOAD PROFILE

The hourly air-conditioner usage varied depending on the amount

of usage that the air-conditioner is desired to have. It is assumed

that on a hot day, the average air-conditioning demand is eight

hours. This is simulated from 11am until 7pm in the evening.

However, to test the capability of the system to handle longer

usage, this was able to be changed to whatever time period was

desired. Also, a constant operating load current value could be

entered that was multiplied with the loading profile to give the

desired load profile.

70
Look-up table input data

[0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
111111110000000000000000111111110000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0]

Figure 7.9: Load current over 96 hours

7.3.2.5 ARRAY VOLTAGE

The array voltage is dependent on the instantaneous battery

voltage. This is discussed further in Section 7.2.2.

7.3.3 BATTERY

The characteristic behaviour of a typical 12V battery can be

approximated by linear equations,

Capacitymax (Ah) Cbatt (Ah)


Vbatt 13.5V  2V
Capacitymax (Ah)

This equation can be used in Simulink to simulate the battery as

shown in the figure below. This model is however very limited and is

not a true representation of battery characteristics. It should be

71
understood that this only a very simplistic model and accurate results

cannot be achieved by its use.

Figure 7.10: Battery model using battery equation

7.3.4 MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS

Numerous mathematical operators are available for use in Simulink.

The following were utilised in the simulation of the system.

Figure 7.11: Mathematical operators used in the Simulink


simulation

Product - The product block is utilised to multiply two inputs and output

the resultant.

Integrator – The integrator block is used to sum inputs over the period

of the simulation and output the total. In the system simulation, this

was used to find total values for the 96 hour period.

Integrator with saturation limit – The integrator with saturation limit

block was used to simulate a charge regulator for the battery. The

upper limit is set to the maximum battery capacity, whilst the lower

72
limit is set to 20Ah to simulate a charge regulator disconnecting the

load from the battery at low capacity.

Sum – The sum block used to subtract one input from another, and

output the resultant.

Multiplexer – The multiplexer block was utilised to display more than

one output on a single graph (scope).

Function Blocks – The function block was used as a transfer function

to manipulate the input by a user-defined function, and then output the

resultant.

7.3.5 OUTPUTS

7.3.5.1 INTRODUCTION

The system simulation displayed outputs of the cell temperature,

array current, array power, battery current, battery capacity, battery

voltage, power balance and equivalent power costs. These outputs

of the simulation were viewed by two different methods. These

were by means of a scope and/or a display block.

Figure 7.12: The outputs methods used in the Simulink


simulation

73
Display – The display block shows the final output in numerical

form.

Scope – The scope shows the outputs in graphical form.

Figure 7.13: Scope window displaying buttons

7.3.5.2 CELL TEMPERATURE

The cell temperature is a direct output from the array model and

was displayed using a scope. For the standard simulation, the

output was as shown in the following figure.

Figure 7.14: Cell temperature over 96 hours

7.3.5.3 ARRAY CURRENT

The array current was also a direct output of the array model and

was displayed using a scope.

74
7.3.5.4 ARRAY POWER

The array power was output from a product block which had an

input of both PV voltage and current.

Figure 7.15: Configuration of array power output

7.3.5.5 BATTERY VOLTAGE

The battery voltage is output from the battery voltage equation that

is defined in Section 7.2.2 and displayed using a scope.

7.3.5.6 BATTERY CURRENT

The battery voltage is the resultant output of a sum block that

subtracts the load current from the PV current. The resultant is the

charging current of the battery and can be seen in the figure below.

Figure 7.16: Configuration of battery current

75
7.3.5.7 BATTERY CAPACITY

The battery capacity is the output of the charge regulator block

since this is the instantaneous capacity. The battery capacity

ranges from a lower limit of 20Ah, to simulate a charge regulator

disconnecting the load at low capacity, to an upper limit defined by

the maximum capacity of the battery, which was 150Ah in this

simulation.

7.3.5.8 ENERGY BALANCE

The Simulink simulation included an energy comparison to display

the generated and consumed energy, as well as the excess energy

in the system over the period of 96 hours. A multiplexer was

utilised to display these three outputs in one scope. The

configuration of the energy balance is as shown in the figure

below.

Figure 7.17: Configuration of energy balance

7.3.5.9 EQUIVALENT ENERGY COSTING

The introduction of a feasibility factor in the simulation enabled the

system to be tested for equivalent economic outputs. The cost of

electricity was introduced into the simulation to display the

76
equivalent value of energy generated and consumed by the

system, and that which is excess to system requirements.

Hypothetically, excess energy could be sold back to the electricity

grid if an inverter is included in the system. This simulation

includes the value of this excess energy. The Western Power A1

tariff of 13.94 cents per kWh was multiplied by the energy curves to

yield the equivalent costs for the 96 hours period.

Also included in the simulation is the costing of a mains-powered

equivalent air-conditioning unit. A 500W unit has been simulated

for this purpose, and the costs are superimposed over the solar-

powered unit’s costs for comparison. The configuration of the

system to simulate these outputs is shown in the figure below.

Figure 7.18: Configuration of equivalent energy costing

7.4 PRELIMINARY LOAD TESTING

7.4.1 INTRODUCTION

The objective of the initial simulations was to test the maximum

allowable load current and power that could be utilised to run both the

77
water pump and the fan motor under various scenarios. As the fan

motor had not been purchased at the time, it was necessary to first

estimate the maximum power that the motor could draw so that a

suitable motor could be selected.

The following assumptions were made about the final system:

 In order to power this system, four 60W BP solar cells would be

used to give a total input power of approximately 240W.

However, that figure is under STC conditions and the expected

output will be slightly less.

 The system will utilise a 12V 150Ah gel deep-cycle battery.

 The water pump was rated at 1.3A constant.

 The average usage of the air-conditioner on a hot summer’s

day would be eight hours. The approximate usage times would be

from 11am until 7pm.

From these assumptions, the system could be simulated to determine

the maximum loading possible, and hence a maximum power rating

for the fan motor determined.

7.4.2 TEST ONE: 8hrs continuous operation

The maximum draw current possible without full battery discharge was

19A, assuming that there is four consecutive days of good irradiation.

78
Therefore the maximum current rating for the fan motor would be 19 -

1.3 = 17.7A. This corresponds to a power rating of,

Prated 17.7 12 212.4W

As shown in the figure below, the battery capacity regains its

maximum value each day under this loading; however any increase

will cause the battery to become discharged over time.

Figure 7.19: Battery capacity over 96 hours

7.4.3 TEST TWO: Failure of one PV

For this simulation the number of parallel modules simulated was 2.25.

This is because 2.25 x 80W modules in parallel yields 180W, which is

the same as 1 failed 60W PV. Once again, the system was tested to

the point where the battery capacity only just regains a maximum

value each day.

79
Figure 7.20: Battery capacity over 96 hours

The maximum draw current possible without full battery discharge

when a PV module fails is 14.7A, again assuming that there is four

consecutive days of good irradiation. Therefore the maximum current

rating for the fan motor would be 14.7 - 1.3 = 13.4A. This corresponds

to a power rating of,

Prated 13.4 12 160.8W

7.4.4 TEST THREE: One cloudy day

As can be seen below, the first day’s irradiation levels have been

simulated at a quarter to simulate a cloudy day. This major factor in

determining the system capability under these conditions is battery

capacity. Since the battery will be receiving very little input power

during the first day of operation, the system will be running off the

battery for eight hours. The battery level should not fall below a depth

of discharge of 60% in order to not damage the battery. Therefore it

should not fall below,

150 - 0.6 x 150 = 150 – 90 = 60Ah

80
Look-up table input data

[0 0 0 0 0 13.5 68.5 94 109.9 116.9 122 123.8 125.5 125.1 123.5


118.4 105.4 84.3 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 548 752 879 935 976 990
1004 1001 988 947 843 674 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 548 752 879
935 976 990 1004 1001 988 947 843 674 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108
548 752 879 935 976 990 1004 1001 988 947 843 674 208 0 0 0 0 0]

Figure 7.21: Irradiance graph with initial cloudy day

Figure 7.22: Battery Capacity with cloudy day and 150Ah


battery

This simulation showed that 12.7A can still be drawn from the battery

on a cloudy day and the system will still recover and not cause

damage to the battery. This corresponds to a power rating of,

Prated 12.7 12 152.4W

81
To test the necessity of a battery with such a high amp-hour rating, a

simulation was run using an 110Ah battery instead of 150Ah. Again

the maximum state of charge was,

110 – 0.6 x 110 = 44Ah

Figure 7.23: Battery Capacity with cloudy day and 110Ah


battery

This simulation showed that 9.7A can still be drawn from the battery

on a cloudy day and the system will still recover and not cause

damage to the battery. From this, it can be seen that a higher amp-

hour rated battery is required to extend the usabili ty of the air-

conditioning system.

7.4.5 PRELIMINARY SIMULATION CONCLUSIONS

From these three tests, a motor was chosen such that the maximum

output power could be gained, but the total load current was less than

the smallest maximum load current that met all three criteria. These

results have shown that the system should be successful even in the

event of a failure or lack of irradiation due to a cloudy day. So long as

82
the constant power draw of the fan motor does not exceed 152W, then

the system should work perfectly.

Tests revealed that there is very little difference in running the system

intermittently or constantly. So long as the current draw is no greater

than that which is being fed back into the system by the PV array

during the day, then the system will continue to operate. Even if there

is a cloudy day, 12.7A can still be drawn from a 150Ah battery for the

8 hours without damage being caused due to over discharging.

During simulations, the maximum load current was determined at the

point where the system can recover to a battery capacity equal to or

higher than the previous day. However, the system may actually be

loaded higher if the unit is not used on every one of the four days or if

it is used for less than eight on a particular day. If the system has time

to recover battery capacity then the maximum load current allowable

will be greater. It is unlikely that the system will be used for 8 hours a

day, for four consecutive days, and therefore higher load currents may

be drawn by the system if it is only used intermittently.

7.5 12V PROTOTYPE SYSTEM TESTING

7.5.1 INTRODUCTION

From these preceding simulations a motor was chosen that should

have yielded a sufficient torque output below a rated current of

approximately 11.4A. The motor chosen was an EMP 250W 30V

83
permanent magnet DC motor rated at 10A continuous and 2000rpm.

This was tested on the prototype under different pulley arrangements

and varied input voltage. This is documented in Chapter Eight.

Simulations were then run on the model, based on the resultant

operating current. The approximate total current draw of the fan motor

and pump is,

8.7 + 1.3 = 10.0A

This value was then simulated under different scenarios to determine

the extent to which the air-conditioner should be capable of operating.

Figure 7.24: Load current profile over 96 hours

From the system costing analysis in Section 9.2, the decision was to

use two BP380 80W cells to power the 12V system.

7.5.2 TEST ONE: 8hrs continuous operation

The system was simulated for eight hour daily usage and under

average irradiation and temperature. The battery capacity did not fall

below approximately 90% SOC and is therefore very capable of

maintaining this normal operation.

84
Figure 7.25: Battery capacity over 96 hours

The energy balance showed that the system has ample generated

energy from the PV modules. The energy consumed is always lower

than the energy generated over the 96 hour period, and so the net

energy curve is ever increasing.

Figure 7.25: Energy balance over 96 hours

Figure 7.26: Total energy generated and consumed over 96


hours

85
The equivalent energy costing curve indicates that the system energy

will cost $2.23 less to run than a mains-powered unit, and the energy

generated by the PV array over the 96 hours period has an equivalent

value of $0.60.

Figure 7.27: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours

Figure 7.28: Total energy costing over 96 hours

This simulation shows that the system would be very capable of 8

hour continuous operation so long as there is average irradiance and

temperature experienced.

7.5.3 TEST TWO: Maximum daily usage

The usability of the solar air-conditioning unit should be closely

comparable to a mains powered unit in order to be feasible. Therefore

it should also be capable of extended usage on an extremely hot day.

This loading characteristic was then tested.

86
It was found that the maximum daily usage is ten hours, rounded to

the nearest hour. The following figures show the battery capacity

curves for 11 hours usage and 10 hour usage respectively. It can be

seen that during 11 hour usage, the battery capacity falls away each

day and the system would not be able to maintain the demand.

However, under the 10 hour loading, the battery capacity is restored to

maximum capacity each day and the system would be capable of

maintaining this loading so long as the irradiation levels do not

change.

Figure 7.29: Battery capacity if run for 11 hours per day

Figure 7.30: Battery capacity if run for 10 hours per day

87
Since the loading period is at a maximum, the difference between the

energy generated and consumed becomes very small. Surplus energy in

the system is small as the system is near optimum performance.

Figure 7.31: Energy balance over 96 hours

Figure 7.32: Total energy generated and consumed over 96


hours

Consequently, the cost of energy generated and consumed is also

very similar. However, since the loading profile is longer than usual,

the cost of the equivalent mains-powered unit also increases and the

cost benefits of the system are consequently greater.

Figure 7.33: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours

88
Figure 7.34: Total energy costing over 96 hours

7.5.4 TEST THREE: Failure of one PV

If one of the PV modules were to fail, and the system only received

half the generated power the system would not be able to maintain

normal loading. The array power would halve due to the loss of the

module, as shown in the figure below.

Figure 7.35: Array Power over 96 hours

Since the energy consumed by the system is greater than that

generated by one module, the battery capacity would drop over the

period of a few days.

89
Figure 7.36: Battery capacity over 96 hours

Consequently, the energy consumed can be seen in the figure below

to be greater than the energy generated. Also, the negative surplus

energy indicates that the battery is being discharged.

Figure 7.37: Energy balance over 96 hours

Figure 7.38: Total energy generated and consumed over 96


hours

Since the generation of energy has halved, the cost of the energy

generated has also halved. However, the cost of energy consumed

remains the same as before since the load has not altered.

90
Figure 7.39: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours

Figure 7.40: Total energy costing over 96 hours

This simulation has shown that the failure of one PV module will cause a

dramatic effect on the usability of the system. The loading profile will

need to be altered in order to maintain system stability. However, as PV

modules are inherently reliable and low maintenance, this issue should

never occur in most systems.

7.5.5 TEST FOUR: One cloudy day

The irradiation levels were limited to a quarter of a sunny day’s to

simulate a cloudy day. An occasional fully cloudy day is likely to occur

even in the summer months. For this reason, the system should be

capable of operating under these conditions. The array power

consequently drops dramatically during the period of poor irradiation,

as shown in the figure below.

91
Figure 7.41: Array power over 96 hours

The simulations found that the sizing of the battery was substantial

enough to allow normal loading even on a cloudy day. The battery is

used to power the system during the period of poor irradiation and falls

to just about half capacity. At this point it is recharged, assuming that

the following day has good irradiation levels. As can be seen in the

figure below, the system takes several days to recover full battery

capacity, whilst maintaining the load the entire time.

Figure 7.42: Battery capacity over 96 hours

The energy balance shows that the energy consumed by the system is

greater than the energy generated for almost all of the 96 hour period;

92
however, the battery supplies the extra energy required by the system,

as represented by the negative nature of the surplus energy curve.

Figure 7.43: Energy balance over 96 hours

Figure 7.44: Total energy generated and consumed over 96


hours

Once again, energy costing indicated that the cost of energy

generated and consumed is almost identical over the 96 hour period.

Figure 7.45: Equivalent energy costing over 96 hours

Figure 7.46: Total energy costing over 96 hours

93
7.5.6 CONCLUSIONS / FINDINGS

Simulink simulations have shown that the system is easily capable of

operating under normal conditions for eight hours. Assuming these

conditions, it can be used to a maximum of ten hours per day without

causing the battery to excessively discharge. Furthermore, it is also

capable of operating even after a cloudy day. However, if two

consecutive cloudy days are experienced, then the system loading will

be required to be decreased or the battery will fully discharge. The

failure of a PV module will also cause the battery to fully discharge

unless the loading is decreased. These simulations have shown that

the system is more than capable of maintaining normal summer

operating conditions and that the prototype is feasible. Further

simulation results for this system are shown in Appendix H.

94
8.0 PROTOTYPE MODEL

8.1 INTRODUCTION

A prototype model of the solar-powered evaporative air-conditioner was

constructed based on the system sizing that had been conducted. The

prototype was then tested to determine its performance characteristics.

This chapter details the construction and testing of the prototype system.

Problems were encountered with completing the prototype due to the

cooling pads and frames being stolen from the university. Due to the

limitation of time and money in this project, this posed a crucial problem.

Replacement pads and frames of affordable cost could not be found and

as such a makeshift replacement had to be implemented. This

replacement is also documented in this chapter.

8.2 CIRCUIT DIAGRAM

The prototype system was connected as shown in Figure 8.1.

Figure 8.1: Prototype system configuration

95
8.3 SYSTEM COMPONENTS

8.3.1 BREEZAIR EA70 AIR-CONDITIONING UNIT

A second-hand mains-powered air conditioner was purchased for the

purpose of modifying it to operate from DC power rather than AC

power. The unit was a medium size roof -mounted evaporative

system, with a centrifugal fan and three cooling pads. The objective

was to replace the existing AC motor and pump with DC equivalents,

such that the output of the system would be comparable with the

original.

Figure 8.2: A similar original evaporative system (Seeley


International, 2004)

Figure 8.3: A similar centrifugal fan (Seeley International, 2004)

8.3.2 WATER PUMP

The original AC water pump was replaced by a similar DC equivalent.

Due to monetary constraints, the pump that was used in the original

96
room evaporative air-conditioner was utilised. This was a Flojet 12V

Water Pump that can displace 4.5L/min. The original AC pump

featured a Tornado 230V/50Hz 2-pole synchronous type motor

(Seeley International, 2004). This pump was capable of pumping

11L/min, and ideally this characteristic should be matched by the

replacement DC pump. However, since the current draw from this

pump was 1.3A and is relatively inefficient, this would simulate a more

efficient pump that can displace more water. The reduced water flow

would only have a small effect on the operation of the system, and

since the cooling pads require replacement, a lesser flow is m ore

appropriate. There are other pumps in the market that would be more

suitable, but for the purpose of this prototype it is acceptable.

Figure 8.4: The original Tornado AC water pump (Seeley


International, 2004)

Figure 8.5: The replacement Flojet 12VDC water pump

97
8.3.3 FAN MOTOR

The original fan motor was a Brook Crompton Parkinson 550W single-

phase induction motor with a rated speed of 2500rpm. The centrifugal

fan was connected to the motor by a belt drive and operated at 300-

500rpm (low/high).

Figure 8.6: The old fan motor

The new motor chosen for the system was an EMP 30VDC 250W

permanent magnet motor. The motor is rated at 2000rpm at 30VDC

with a 10A continuous rating. Since the motor would be powered by

12V, it will operate at a fraction of the rated speed. This motor is not

the most ideal for the situation, however due to the 30VDC rating; it

allows different operating voltages to be tested. Also, different pulley

sizes can be used to vary the fan speed.

98
Figure 8.7: The new DC fan motor

8.3.4 BATTERY

The prototype system was tested with a 12V 150Ah Gel Cel deep

cycle battery. The loads were connected in parallel with the battery,

and a charge regulator used to protect it from overcharge. Since the

system voltage would then be locked to the battery voltage, no MPPT

is required in the system. The MPP of the PV modules is very close to

this voltage and therefore there is minimal benefit in adding an MPPT.

Figure 8.8: The 12V 150Ah Gel Cell Battery used in the
prototype system

99
8.3.5 SOLAR MODULES

Four BPSX60 60W solar modules were utilised in the testing of the

prototype system. They were connected in parallel to achieve the 12V

desired output. They were tilted at an angle of 30 degrees, rather than

the summer optimum of 22 degrees. The prototype test could not be

run all day since the power output of the array is affected by shading

from neighbouring buildings in the late afternoon. This should not be

the case in a residentially implemented system.

Figure 8.9: The BPSX60 60W module array

8.3.6 CHARGE REGULATOR

A 12/24V 35A Trace Engineering charge/load regulator was used in

the prototype system. This charge regulator used a three stage pulse

width modulated method for charge control. This was connected in

series with the PV array to control the charge of the battery. However,

it was not used to disconnect the load if the battery capacity fell too

low. This will be controlled only by the main air-conditioner on/off

switch.

100
8.4 BELT DRIVES AND PULLEYS

8.4.1 INTRODUCTION

The original system utilised a V-belt drive to link the fan motor and the

centrifugal fan. A major aspect in the construction of the prototype

was the selection of an appropriate motor pulley size. The speed of

the motor was required to be stepped down to a suitable fan operating

speed. The optimum speed that was desired was around 500rpm and

so this was set as the target to achieve. The pulley size on the fan

was fixed as this was too hard to replace, due to its size and the

nature of its attachment to the shaft. This pulley was 232mm in

diameter, and so using this figure, a suitable fan pulley size could be

determined.

Figure 8.10: Fan and motor pulleys connected by a V-belt drive

The fan motor would operate at an approximate no-load speed of,

Voperating
noperating  nrated
Vrated

101
12V
noperating  2000 800rpm
30V

This rotational speed is then required to be stepped down to the

required operating speed of 500rpm.

8.4.2 PULLEY SELECTION

The pulley ratio required to achieve this is,

800
Ratio pulley  1.6 :1
500

Since the fan pulley is fixed at 232mm in diameter, the required motor

pulley diameter will be,

232
145mm
1.6

This motor pulley size was implemented and tested. However, it was

found that the current drawn by the motor was 16.7A, which is well in

excess of the rated current of 10A. An alternative pulley size had to

be chosen that would limit the current to less than 10A, whilst

maximising the fan speed. A variety of different pulley sizes were

tested to ascertain the optimum diameter. These are shown in the

figure below.

Figure 8.11: Various size pulleys tested

102
The pulley variations were tested initially on a 12V system, but also on

a 24V system. A 24V system would require a smaller motor pulley to

yield the desired fan speed. A problem arose whereby the motor

became highly loaded due to the tension of the V-belt. The V-belt was

re qu ire d t o be e xt re m e ly t igh t in o rder t o b en d a ro un d th e

circumference of the small motor pulleys. This added extra loading on

the motor and therefore a higher load current was experienced. The

24V system was not tested any further since the required fan speed

would not be able to be achieved. The results from the pulley

variations are shown in the table following.

Table 8.1: The effect of pulley size on load current and speed
Motor Motor Fan
Pulley Pulley Battery Load speed speed
Size Voltage Current
(mm) Ratio (V) (A) (rpm) (rpm)
12V

75 3.09:1 13.3 6.8 835 27

91 2.55:1 12.7 7.3 709 27.8

115 2.02:1 12.65 10.8 667 33

150 1.55:1 12.7 16.7 570 36.8


24V

75 3.09:1 25.1 16 1452 470

91 2.55:1 25.1 7.9 740 290

From these results, an approximate pulley size for a 12V system could

be determined that would result in optimum fan speed whilst remaining

below the rated current. Appendix B shows the graph of these results

and shows the selected pulley size, the theoretical fan speed and the

load current. From this it was clear that a pulley size of 110mm would

be optimal and would result in a fan speed of approximately 320rpm.

A 108mm pulley was selected for the unit as this was the closest size

103
available. This pulley selection proved correct, with the fan speed at

326rpm and the load current below rated at 9.7A.

8.5 PROTOTYPE CONSTRUCTION

The selected 108mm motor pulley was attached to the fan motor and a

suitable length V-belt was used to connect it to the centrifugal fan. The

motor position was then adjusted to give a suitable tension on the belt.

The water pump was mounted to the side of the fan housing to ensure

that it was in a semi-dry position. Hosing was then attached, with one

end inserted into the water sump and the other to the water distribution

system in the unit’s roof. The electrical wiring was then attached to both

the fan motor and the water pump and ducted out of the unit. Shade cloth

was then used as a replacement for the absent cooling pads, such that

the water would have a surface to flow down and into the water sump.

Shade cloth was chosen as the most appropriate alternative since it is

easily malleable and allows airflow through it. The completed air -

conditioning unit is shown in the figure below.

Figure 8.12: The completed prototype with air duct and


“cooling pads”

104
8.6 FULL PROTOTYPE SYSTEM TESTING

8.6.1 INTRODUCTION

The system was tested during a partially cloudy day in late April for a

period of two hours. Due to the lack of proper cooling pads, the

system inherently leaked water and could not be tested for any

extended length of time. The results however were promising and

proved that this system is feasible.

Figure 8.13: The prototype test was run on a partially cloudy


day

8.6.2 FAN SPEED

The desired centrifugal fan speed of 500rpm was not achieved, as the

actual speed ranged from 325-350 rpm. Event thought the system

was utilising a battery, a 25rpm variation was experienced. This is due

to the battery voltage varying slightly due to the instantaneous

irradiation levels. This can be seen in Appendix C and D.

105
8.6.3 ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE

The results of the prototype test with four BPSX60 60W PV modules

can be viewed in Appendix A. The graph of this test can be viewed in

Appendix D.

The results of the prototype test with three BPSX60 60W PV modules

can be viewed in Appendix A. The graph of this test can be viewed in

Appendix C.

Overall the findings were as follows:

 PV Current – This was found as expected, to be directly

proportional to the instantaneous irradiance. As it can be seen

from the graphs, the PV current strictly follows the irradiance.

 PV and battery Voltage – These two voltages were very similar

to each other as expected. The battery voltage is always

slightly less than the PV voltage however, due to the charge

regulator ensuring that the charging voltage is slightly higher

than normal voltage. These voltages dip slightly upon low

irradiation levels; however they quickly recover when direct

sunlight returns.

 Load Current – The load current was approximately constant at

10A for the entire test, and had a maximum deviation of 0.5A.

This varied with direct respect to the instantaneous irradiation.

106
 Battery Charge – The rate of discharge and charge of the

battery can be viewed by comparing the load current and the

PV current. The battery charging current will be,

Icharging I PV Iload

The PV current is above the load current approximately 50% of

the sampled time, and can therefore be seen to be maintaining

a constant charge. However, under direct sunlight and during

the summer months, the charging rate would be much higher.

8.6.4 AIR SPEED AND COOLING PERFORMANCE

The output air speed was measured with an anemometer. Five

measurements were taken at different sections of the duct to give a

more accurate result.

Figure 8.14: Output air speed at different locations of the


output ducting

The resulting average air speed was,

3.9 3.8 5.0 4.6 4.5


Air speedave  4.36m/s
5

107
Since the output ducting is 0.4m by 0.355m, the cross-sectional area

is,

Acrosssection 0.400 0.355 0.142m


2

The system therefore outputs,

Air output 0.142 4.36 0.619m / s


3

In terms of output per minute this is,

Air output 0.619 60 37.15m / min


3

This method of output estimation is quite primitive and so a relative

comparison to the original unit needs to be established. Since the

original unit was designed to cool an area of around 150m3, it should

be able to output this quantity of air per minute. Using the same

methodology as previously, a unit with centrifugal fan running at

500rpm would have an output of,

500 3
Air output500rpm  37.15 57.15m / min
325

The equivalent output of the solar-powered unit will be approximately,

150 3 3
Air outputEquiv  37.15 98.42m / min 100m / min
57.15

Therefore, the solar-powered 12V system is only outputting

approximately two-thirds that of the original mains-powered unit.

However, this would still be capable of cooling a small house or two to

three large rooms.

108
9.0 FEASIBILITY STUDY

9.1 INTRODUCTION

Perth is an ideal location for a solar-powered air-conditioner. The load

profile in the summer months is almost identical to the irradiation profile.

During summer Perth commonly experiences days where the irradiation

levels are above 1000W/m2, thus making it an ideal location for a solar

power installation. With the power crisis of recent summers still in

people’s minds, and the ever increasing trend of converting to green

power, there is a great opportunity to market this system. This chapter

details the cost of setting up such a system in Perth, and analyses its

economic viability.

9.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS

9.2.1 INTRODUCTION

The two alternative systems will be discussed in regard to cost

estimation. The cost of the prototype 12V system will be discussed,

as well as the theoretical cost for a 24V system if it were to be

implemented.

9.2.2 12V SYSTEM

A 12V evaporative air-conditioning system will consist of a 12V Flojet

water pump, a 250W 30VDC EMP fan motor, a 150Ah 12V gel cell

deep cycle battery, and either three BPSX60 60W or two BP380 80W

PV modules.

109
9.2.3 24V SYSTEM

A 24V evaporative air-conditioning system will consist of a 24V Shurflo

water pump, a 250W 30VDC EMP fan motor, two 150Ah 12V gel cell

deep cycle batteries, and either five BPSX60 60W or four BP380 80W

PV modules.

9.3 SYSTEM COSTING

9.3.1 INTRODUCTION

The 12V system is far more economically viable than the 24V system

as it requires less PV modules. However, it doesn’t output as much

cooling power as the 24V system would.

9.3.2 12V SYSTEM

For the implementation of the 12V system, the capital cost for the

system will be between $2692 and $2932. The system can be

implemented at the minimal cost of $2692 using two BP380 80W PV

modules. The additional $240 to implement an extra 20W of power

using BPSX60 modules is not economically viable. The reasoning

behind this can be seen if the value of the module is considered as a

cost per Watt of power.

One BPSX60 60 W PV module costs $530, and so the cost per Watt

is:

$530
$8.33 /W
60

110
Therefore 20W of power would have a theoretical value of:

$8.33/W 20W $166.66

This is much less than the $240 that would otherwise have to be paid

to achieve the additional 20W of power.

The itemised costing for the 12V system is shown in the table below.

Table 9.1: Itemised costing of 12V system


Item Qty Unit Cost Total
BPSX60 60W Solar Panels 3 $530.00 $1,590.00
or
BP380 80W Solar Panels 2 $675.00 $1,350.00
Air-conditioning base unit 1 $100.00 $100.00
EMP 30VDC 250W Fan Motor 1 $550.00 $550.00
Flojet 12V Water Pump 1 $110.00 $110.00
12V 150Ah Deep Cycle Battery 1 $450.00 $450.00
WPA 12V 20A Charge Regulator 1 $132.00 $132.00
Total Cost: $2692-$2932
(Prices sourced from retailer websites: http://www.shurflo.com; http://www.solazone.com;
http://www.solarvalley.com.au; http://www.4lots.com; http://www.thesustainablevillage.com)

9.3.3 24V SYSTEM

The 24V system has a capital cost of between $4468 and $4518. This

system will operate with greater performance than the 12V system, but

will have an initial cost $1826 greater. An additional 20W of power

can be achieved by utilising four BP380 PV modules; however this will

cost an additional $50. Once again, the decision on PV module

choice can be made based on the cost per Watt equivalent.

Once again, 20W of power would have a theoretical value of:

$8.33/W 20W $166.66

111
This is far more than the $50 that would otherwise have to be paid to

achieve the additional 20W of power. Therefore the option to pay an

extra $50 for four BP380 PV modules would be more beneficial.

The itemised costing for the 24V system is shown in the table

following.

Table 9.2: Itemised costing of 24V system


Unit
Item Qty Cost Total
BPSX60 60W Solar Panels 5 $530 $2,650
or
BP380 80W Solar Panels 4 $675.00 $2,700.00
Air-conditioning base unit 1 $100 $100
EMP 30VDC 250W Fan Motor 1 $550 $550
Shurflo 24 V Water Pump 1 $136 $136
12V 150Ah Deep Cycle Battery 2 $450 $900
WPA 24V 20A Charge Regulator 1 $132 $132
Total $4468-
Cost: $4518
(Prices sourced from retailer websites: http://www.shurflo.com; http://www.solazone.com;
http://www.solarvalley.com.au; http://www.4lots.com; http://www.thesustainablevillage.com)

From this costing analysis, it can be seen that the opt imum 12V

system will cost $2692. The optimum 24V system will cost $4518.

9.4 PAYBACK PERIOD

9.4.1 INTRODUCTION

The economical viability of the system can be determined by

assessing its pay back period. This is the time that is required to pay

back the initial capital cost with the savings that the system produces.

112
9.4.2 12V SYSTEM

T h e p o we r co n su m p t io n o f t h e 1 2 V s yst e m o ve r 4 d a ys is

4.307kWhrs. This is equivalent to,

4.307
1077Whrs / day 1.077kWhrs / day
4

Assuming that the Western Power A1 Tariff, the cost per kWhr of

electricity is 13.94 cents, the cost of the power consumption per day

will be,

1.077kWhrs 13.94 15.01cents / day

The capital cost of implementing the 12V system is $2692. Therefore

the payback period is,

2692
17934days
0.1501

Assuming the unit is only used approximately 90 days per year over

the summer months, this would equate to,

17934
199.3years
90

From this analysis, it is clear that the unit will never recover its capital

costs in the life of the air-conditioning unit. However, the system

should be assessed by means of a different pay back analysis.

Since the system would be chosen over a mains-powered unit, a pay

back analysis should be conducted on the time it would take to pay

back the difference in cost between the two systems. Therefore, a

comparison needs to be made against the cost of a similar sized air-

conditioning unit. A similar unit would cost approximately $2500

113
(Bintec Pty Ltd, 2002). A comparison can be achieved by calculating

the average yearly cost of both systems. This will include capital

costs, operating cost and maintenance costs. For the purpose of

comparing the units on the basis of solar-power versus mains-power,

general air-conditioning maintenance cost have not been included as

this would be standard for both systems.

Figure 9.1: Equivalent cost per year compared to mains-powered


unit

A table of these costs can be viewed in Appendix I. It is assumed that

the average operating cost of an equivalent mains-powered unit is,

0.5kW 8 0.1394 $0.5576/day

Therefore the cost per year for operating for 90 days during the

summer months would be,

$0.5576/day 90 $50.18 / year

Therefore, the operating cost for a mains-powered unit is estimated to

be $50 per year. The operating cost of the solar-powered unit is nil,

114
however it requires replacement of the battery approximately every

five years.

By this cost analysis it can seen that the solar-powered unit becomes
th
cheaper on an average total cost per year basis at the 17 year.

9.4.3 24V SYSTEM

The power savings of the 24V system would be greater than that of

the 12V system; however the capital costs are much higher. The

resultant pay back period would be far greater than the 12V system.

9.5 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Further reduction in the pay back period could hypothetically be achieved

by selling excess energy back into the electricity grid. Since the load

would be zero in months other than summer, this energy is unused. This

energy could be utilised to help pay back the system costs faster.

However, the cost involved in the set up of such a grid connection would

be far too high to make it feasible for a small system such as this one.

Therefore, no analysis will be conducted on the revenue that could be

generated from such a system.

Ultimately the solar-powered evaporative air-conditioning unit is a stand-

alone, green alternative to regular mains-powered units. It would be

targeted at customers who have no grid connection, those who want more

115
reliability in their cooling demand, and/or those who wish to make a

commitment to a cleaner future.

9.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

A comparison of the greenhouse emissions of the solar and mains-

powered unit will show that the solar unit is far superior in an

environmental analysis. Neglecting the emissions and energy required in

manufacturing the units, the two units have been compared on several

factors. Firstly a comparison of the amount of coal required to produce

the required electrical energy was conducted. To produce 1kWh of

electricity, 0.461kg of coal is required to be burnt. Secondly, the amount

of greenhouse gases produced was compared. For simplicity,

greenhouse gases can be lumped together in a single measure of CO2

equivalent emissions, referred to as CO2e (Western Power, 2002). For

example, 1kg of Methane (CH4) produced converts to an equivalent of

21kg of CO2e.

The solar powered unit does not require any coal to be burnt and hence

does not produce any greenhouse emissions. Contrary to this is the

mains-powered unit which consumes,

0.5kW 8 90 360kWh/year.

This equates to,

360kWh 0.461kg 165.96kg of coal/year.

Since 1.114kg of CO2e is produced for 1kWh of electricity, this equates

to,

116
360kWh 1.114kg 401.4kg of CO2 gas/year.

The environmental benefits of the solar unit are therefore significant over

the life of the unit. A graph of these values over 20 years can be viewed

in below.

Figure 9.2: Coal and CO2e emissions saved by use of solar


system

117
10.0 CONCLUSION

10.1 INTRODUCTION

The solar-powered evaporative air-conditioning unit has been found to be

a very feasible concept. W hilst the prototype system tested was

successful in operation, it did not perform to the desired performance

level. Various changes to the design can be made to give the system far

better performance.

The 12V prototype system was capable of outputting sufficient cooling for

two to three rooms. This fell short of the desire to cool an entire

household.

10.2 SYSTEM LIMITATIONS

10.2.1 INTRODUCTION

There were several limiting factors that resulted in the mediocre

performance of the prototype system.

10.2.2 BELT DRIVE LIMITATIONS

The major limiting factor encountered was that of the belt drive. Since

the original mains-powered air-conditioner had a much more powerful

fan motor, the type of belt and pulley system utilised did not required

high efficiency. Due to the constraints of the solar-powered system,

the conversion of electrical to mechanical power is required to be as

high as possible. The prototype system used an A-section V-belt drive

to connect the fan motor to the centrifugal fan. V-belt drives are a

118
relatively inefficient means of delivering power to the load. The

problem occurs due to the inflexible nature of their construction, which

restricts their ability to bend around small pulleys. The additional

loading causes the motor to operate above rated torque and the

current is consequently too high. A larger pulley size was therefore

utilised in the prototype system, which restricted the centrifugal fan

speed to only 325-350rpm.

10.2.3 TESTING LIMITATIONS

The testing of the prototype system was limited due to the absence of

appropriate cooling pads. This meant that the system could not be run

for any extended length of time due to water leakage. It was sufficient

however to show that the electrical performance of the system is more

than capable of the desired operation.

10.3 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY

The attractiveness of solar EAC depends largely on the availability and

cost of electric power. Power generated by PVs may cost $0.32/kWh or

more, compared with $0.1394/kWh for power from the grid. PV systems

are most likely to be cost effective where grid power does not yet reach.

Nevertheless, the solar-powered evaporative air-conditioning is a

technology that can be very useful and efficient in such circumstances.

The unit has a relatively comparable price to that of a mains-powered

unit. If the system was to be developed in a similar manner to that of the

119
prototype unit, whereby an old AC system is converted to DC, then the

cost is minimal. However, if the unit were to be manufactured on a large

scale and a mark-up placed on the system costs, then the unit may not be

as economically attractive to the consumer. The prototype system

constructed costs slightly more than that of an equivalent mains-powered

unit. The economic feasibility is sufficient that consumers searching for a

green alternative or a stand alone air-conditioning system that is

independent from the electricity grid would be attracted to the unit.

10.4 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

10.4.1 INTRODUCTION

Further improvements will be able to be made to the design to improve

the unit’s performance.

10.4.2 HYBRID SYSTEM

An investigation into the use of a hybrid system could be performed,

for periods of poor solar radiation. The unit could easily be connected

to the grid to top up battery levels if they fall below the required level

because of poor solar power output. Simulations can be run with solar

radiation levels and ambient temperatures from a winter month to

further determine the unit’s capabilities.

10.4.3 SYSTEM VOLTAGE

The system voltage utilised should be 24V rather than the 12V tested

with the prototype. This will allow the fan motor to be used to a higher

120
performance level, and increase the centrifugal fan speed to the

desired 500rpm. The system would require two 12V batteries and as

such would increase system costs. The 24V system would require an

smaller pulley on the fan motor and as such an alternative belt drive

will be required to be used.

10.4.4 BELT DRIVE

The belt should be a tooth drive rather than a V -drive. This will

decrease the additional load that the drive applies on the fan motor.

Tooth drives are more flexible and do not require much tension to

prevent the belt from slipping. They are therefore more efficient and

are capable of use on small pulleys.

10.4.5 WATER PUMP

The performance of the Flojet water pump was sufficient for the testing

of the prototype system. However, the current draw from the pump

was relatively high in comparison to similar flow rate pumps. Other

pumps with 4.5L/min rating could be sourced that have about half the

power rating. The water pump in the solar unit should be equivalent in

performance to a mains-powered unit. Therefore a flow rate of

11L/min would be desired. These are available, with rated current

similar to the existing Flojet pump.

121
Alternatively, the pump could be driven from the fan motor. This

would decrease the load current and increase the efficiency of the

system.

10.4.6 FAN MOTOR

A fan motor that has an optimised speed at the system voltage will

increase the performance of the unit. The prototype fan motor was

rated at 30VDC, whilst the system voltage was only 40% of this value.

Optimum performance of the motor could therefore not be achieved.

10.4.7 FAN TYPE

The unit design should be altered such that a large axial fan can be

utilised rather than a centrifugal fan. Axial fans are more efficient

since they are a direct drive from the motor. The efficiency

improvement would be quite substantial.

122
11.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arizona Solar Center, 2005, Nickel-Cadmium batteries. Retrieved:


May 3, 2005, from
http://www.azsolarcenter.com/technology/batteries/pdfs/ch4.pdf.

Bintec Pty Ltd., 2002, Airconditioners. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from
http://www.thisplace.com.au/priceguide/aircond.htm.

Blanchard, C., 2003, How An Evaporative Cooler Works. Retrieved:


May 9, 2005, from
http://www.coolmax.mx.com.au/evapcool/evapopn.htm.

Bom, G., Foster, R., Dijkstra, E., Tummer-s, A., 1999, World bank
technical paper No. 421, Evaporative Air-Conditioning Applications for
Environmentally Friendly Cooling. Retrieved: February 26, 2005, from
www.worldbank.org.

Breezair, 2004, Cost calculator. Retrieved: September 14, 2004, from


http://www.breezair.com.au/calculator.html.

Center for Innovation in Product Development, Understanding DC


motor characteristics. Retrieved: May 12, 2005, from
http://lancet.mit.edu/motors/motors3.html.

Dartnell, J., 2005, Air conditioning. Retrieved: May 9, 2005, from


http://services.eng.uts.edu.au/~johnd.

Electric Motor Products Pty Ltd, DC motors and gears. Retrieved:


March 23, 2005, from http://www.emppl.com.au.

EPI Inc, 2004, Properties of belt drives. Retrieved: May 21, 2005, from
http://www.epi-eng.com/BAS-BeltDrives.htm.

Globe Motors, 2005, DC motors. Retrieved: May 21, 2005, from


http://www.globe-motors.com/dc_motor.pdf.

Lawrance, W., 2005, Renewable Energy Principles - Introduction to


Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems, Curtin
University of Technology, Perth.

Lawrance, W., 2005, Renewable Energy Principles - Simulation


Laboratory 2, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.

Lawrance, W., Wichert, B., 1994, ‘A Versatile PV Module Simulation


Model based on PSI/e’, Solar Energy, vol 52, no. 2, pp. 191-195.

123
Leading Outdoor Technology Supply LLC, 2005, Deep cycle batteries.
Retrieved: April 27, 2005, from
http://www.4lots.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=86
5.

Mark Ellis and Associates, 2001, Analysis of Potential for Minimum


Energy Performance Standards for Evaporative Air Conditioners.
Retrieved: April 17, 2005, from
http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/tech-evapac2001.pdf.
nd
Markvart, T., 2000, Solar Electricity, 2 edn, John Wiley and Sons,
Brisbane.

Monsour, P., 2001, Photovoltaic Power Systems, Brisbane Institute of


TAFE, Brisbane.

Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Glossary of Solar


Radiation Resource Terms, Dry -bulb temperature Retrieved: May 11,
2005, from, http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/glossary/gloss_d.html.

Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, 2005, Glossary of


Solar Radiation Resource Terms, Wet-bulb temperature. Retrieved:
May 11, 2005, from http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/glossary/gloss_w.html.

Premier Industries Inc, 2005, About evaporative cooling. Retrieved:


May 11, 2005, from http://www.piec.com/page3.htm.

Shurflo LLC, Water pumps. Retrieved: May 6, 2005, from


http://www.shurflo.com/pdf/rv/product_data_sheets/pds-2088-473-
143.pdf.

Seeley International Pty Ltd, 2004, Breezair evaporative air-


conditioning system. Retrieved: September 14, 2004, from
http://www.breezair.com.au/p_icon.html.

Seeley International Pty Ltd, n.d, Tornado Evaporative Cooler Pump


Technical Data.

Solar Valley Electronics, 2005, Solar panel pricing. Retrieved: April 24,
2005, from http://www.solarvalley.com.au/solarpanelspricing.htm.

Solazone, Cables, wiring and accessories. Retrieved: May 11, 2005,


from http://www.solazone.com.au/wiring.htm.

Solazone, Regulators and maximisers. Retrieved: May 11, 2005, from


http://www.solazone.com.au/Regulators.htm.

Sustainable Population Australia Inc., 2004, SPA Newsletter No 61.


Retrieved: March 31, 2005, from
http://www.population.org.au/pressrm/newslet/nl200403.pdf.

124
Sustainable Village, Shurflo water pump prices. Retrieved: April 27,
2005, from
http://www.thesustainablevillage.com/products/catalogs/vol1no1/scree
n/02_SV_2002_Water.pdf.

ThinkQuest, 2005, The history of solar power. Retrieved: April 8, 2005,


from http://library.thinkquest.org/26663/en/4_3_4.html.

Wenham, S., et al, 1995, Applied Photovoltaics, Centre for PV


Devices and Systems, Sydney.

Western Power Corporation, 2002, FAQ's for Earth Friendly.


Retrieved: 26/05/05, from
http://www.westernpower.com.au/html/home/green_energy/home_eart
h_friendly/earth_friendly_faq.html.

Zahedi, A., 1998, Solar Photovoltaic Energy Workshop ’98, Monash


University, Melbourne.

125
12.0 APPENDICES

12.1 APPENDIX A

Prototype Test - 4 PV modules - Run time: 12:50pm - 1:50pm


G PV Battery Load Motor
n (W/m2) V (V) I (A) P (W) V (V) I (A) P (W) I (A) P (W) (rpm)
1 246 12.84 3.17 40.70 12.86 3.12 40.12 10.40 133.74 697
2 990 13.26 12.95 171.72 13.23 11.70 154.79 9.85 130.32 722
3 650 13.26 5.17 68.55 13.12 6.50 85.28 9.79 128.44 701
4 290 13.17 4.64 61.11 13.20 5.65 74.58 9.97 131.60 707
5 190 12.85 2.75 35.34 12.85 3.05 39.19 9.35 120.15 698
6 181 12.83 2.67 34.26 12.83 2.94 37.72 9.30 119.32 700
7 226 12.83 3.19 40.93 12.81 3.20 40.99 9.31 119.26 701
8 908 13.62 12.32 167.80 13.25 13.12 173.84 9.80 129.85 727
9 902 13.88 11.82 164.06 13.49 12.63 170.38 10.02 135.17 738
10 918 14.01 11.06 154.95 13.65 12.35 168.58 10.09 137.73 745
11 947 14.11 11.46 161.70 13.73 12.42 170.53 10.26 140.87 751
12 973 14.13 11.88 167.86 13.76 11.86 163.19 10.32 142.00 752
13 962 14.13 11.34 160.23 13.79 11.38 156.93 10.25 141.35 754
14 988 14.16 11.75 166.38 13.80 11.69 161.32 10.22 141.04 756
15 901 13.90 9.38 130.38 13.69 9.26 126.77 10.08 138.00 743
16 507 13.54 5.90 79.89 13.43 5.62 75.48 9.74 130.81 734
17 891 13.62 10.02 136.47 13.32 9.93 132.27 9.66 128.67 731
18 889 13.69 10.08 138.00 13.40 10.07 134.94 9.81 131.45 737
19 919 13.70 10.11 138.51 13.41 10.11 135.58 9.79 131.28 737
20 270 13.10 4.06 53.19 13.15 3.69 48.52 9.63 126.63 717
21 848 13.45 10.15 136.52 13.16 10.15 133.57 9.65 126.99 724
22 817 13.50 9.15 123.53 13.23 9.75 128.99 9.77 129.26 726
23 805 13.50 9.52 128.52 13.23 9.45 125.02 9.75 128.99 726

Prototype Test - 3 PV modules - Run time: 2:12pm - 2:42pm


G PV Battery Load Motor
n (W/m2) V (V) I (A) P (W) V (V) I (A) P (W) I (A) P (W) (rpm)
1 745 13.05 6.36 83.00 12.90 6.36 82.04 10.34 133.39 706
2 750 13.03 6.46 84.17 12.89 6.46 83.27 10.28 132.51 705
3 751 13.02 6.48 84.37 12.68 6.48 82.17 10.35 131.24 705
4 723 13.01 6.30 81.96 12.87 6.30 81.08 10.28 132.30 704
5 733 13.02 6.34 82.55 12.88 6.34 81.66 10.26 132.15 704
6 712 13.00 6.23 80.99 12.87 6.23 80.18 10.28 132.30 704
7 710 13.01 6.26 81.44 12.87 6.26 80.57 9.58 123.29 706
8 686 13.00 6.10 79.30 12.87 6.10 78.51 9.64 124.07 705
9 668 12.99 5.98 77.68 12.87 5.98 76.96 9.52 122.52 703
10 671 12.99 6.97 90.54 12.87 6.97 89.70 9.56 123.04 704
11 632 12.97 5.68 73.67 12.86 5.68 73.04 9.48 121.91 705
12 646 12.98 5.83 75.67 12.86 5.83 74.97 9.51 122.30 707
13 651 12.98 5.83 75.67 12.86 5.83 74.97 9.57 123.07 705

126
12.2 APPENDIX B

Graph of the effect of Pulley size on load current and speed.

127
12.3 APPENDIX C

Prototype testing results over 1/2hr using 3 BPSX60 modules

128
12.4 APPENDIX D

Prototype testing results over 1hr using 4 BPSX60 modules

129
12.5 APPENDIX E

BPSX60 60W PV module characteristic data

130
12.6 APPENDIX F

Simulink System Schematic

131
12.7 APPENDIX G

Irradiation data

132
Irradiation data

133
Irradiation data

134
Irradiation data

135
Irradiation data

136
12.8 APPENDIX H

TEST ONE: 8hrs continuous operation

 8 hrs operation
 2 BP380 modules
 150Ah battery
 Good irradiation

137
138
TEST TWO: Maximum daily usage

 10 hrs operation
 2 BP380 modules
 150Ah battery
 Good irradiation

139
140
TEST THREE: Failure of one PV

 8 hrs operation
 1 BP380 modules
 150Ah battery
 Good irradiation

141
142
TEST FOUR: One cloudy day

 8 hrs operation
 2 BP380 modules
 150Ah battery
 Poor irradiation on the first day

143
12.9 APPENDIX I

144

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen