Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Event-related P300 potentials closely reflect cognitive functions such as stimulus discrimination (N250) and
processing time (P300 latencies) as well as attention capabilities (P300 amplitudes). To delineate the age-related
dynamics of P300 potentials, we investigated 250 healthy subjects between 18 and 98 years of age in a cross-sectional
study. A total of 330 visual P300 tests was performed in two different paradigms (PI, passive condition, n = 80; PII,
active condition, n = 250). In both P300 paradigms, the N250 and P300 latencies were markedly prolonged (p <
.0001) in older age, whereas the N250 andP300 latency differences between PII and PI did not change (p > .05). The
P300 amplitudes in paradigm I and II revealed only a slight age-related reduction. In fact, the P300 amplitude ratios
between PII and PI remained constant. Third-order polynomial regressions provided the best fit of the aging-P300
interactions in paradigms I and II for both males and females. Interestingly, females showed a greater and possibly
earlier P300 latency increase during aging than males. These age-related changes ofP300 potentials indicate a rather
mild cognitive decline that does not accelerate before old age and may be different between both sexes.
T TNDER normal conditions, early components of evoked characterized. The P3b is elicited by task-relevant stimuli
U potentials (EPs) such as the N75 or PI00 of the pattern the subjects have to attend to and reveals maximum ampli-
reversal visual-evoked potentials are always evoked by ap- tudes over centroparietal regions. The P3a elicited by unex-
propriate physical stimuli and obviously reflect the process- pectedly occurring or emitted task-nonrelevant stimuli
ing of their physical qualities in modality-dependent areas of shows a frontocentral amplitude maximum (Squires et al.,
the central nervous system. In contrast to these exogenous 1975). For the novel P3, very complex, task-nonrelevant
potentials, event-related P300 potentials are elicited by the stimuli are applied having no similarities with each other. It
unexpected occurrence (evoked P3) or omission (emitted occurs especially frontally and rapidly habituates (Cour-
P3) of task-relevant stimuli (Sutton et al., 1965; Ruchkin et chesne et al., 1975). Topographic analyses of P300 poten-
al., 1975), that is even without the presence of any physical tials in both humans (Simson et al., 1977; Halgren et al.,
stimulus. Therefore, these positive potential peaks occurring 1980; Yingling and Hosobuchi, 1984; Smith et al., 1990)
at about 300 msec (P300) after a specific event are referred to and animals (Harrison et al., 1988; Pineda et al., 1988)
as "endogenous." Although the P300 latencies were found argue in favor of a widespread ability of various neuronal
to be related to stimulus evaluation time for future tasks and networks (e.g., with frontal, parietal, temporal, and hippo-
relatively independent of the execution of motor responses campal location) to respond to certain events by generating
(Kutas et al., 1977; Donchin and Coles, 1988), the negativ- P300 activity. Moreover, both cholinergic (Hammond et al.,
ity immediately preceding the P300 potential (called N2 or, 1987; Meador et al., 1987; Onofrj et al., 1987) and do-
as we prefer, N250) proved to be more closely associated paminergic neurotransmitter systems (Glover et al., 1988;
with the immediate control of overt behavior (Duncan- Noble et al., 1994) seem to be involved in P300 generation,
Johnson and Donchin, 1977). The P300 amplitudes are very but the relevance of these findings especially as to other
sensitive to both objective overall probability of event occur- neurotransmitters (Pinedaetal., 1987; Pritchardetal., 1987;
rence and subjective expectancy (Squires et al., 1976; Ito et al., 1990) still has to be exactly delineated.
Duncan-Johnson and Donchin, 1977; Horstetal., 1980) and From an applied perspective, P300 potentials can be used
closely reflecting subjective task relevance (Wickens et al., in clinical investigations as a neurophysiological variable of
1983) and attention capabilities (Naatanen, 1975). More- cognitive human brain action, provided that their diagnostic
over, P300 amplitude changes may even predict the proba- power has clearly been delineated. One crucial prerequisite
bility of correct remembrance of special stimuli (Fabiani et for the clinical utility of P300 potentials, however, is the
al., 1986) or indicate changes of behavioral responses in the exact knowledge of their age-related alterations. Since the
future (Johnson and Donchin, 1982). These data on P300 number of elderly subjects afflicted by cognition disorders is
potentials were interpreted by psychological concepts such increasing worldwide (Jorm et al., 1987; Henderson, 1993),
as expectancy (Squires et al., 1976), stimulus evaluation a growing body of studies investigated aging effects on P300
(Kutas et al., 1977), and context updating (Donchin and potentials to differentiate between physiological and patho-
Coles, 1988). logical aging of cognitive human brain functions (Kiigler et
Besides these psychological connotations, P300 poten- al., 1993a, for review). Converging lines of evidence indi-
tials clearly are physiological phenomena. Up to now, at cate rather mild changes in P300 potentials during aging. By
least three different kinds of P300 potentials have been contrast, there are some controversies about the best fit
B3
B4 KUGLER ET AL.
regression model for the aging-P300 interaction that may of "transient attention"). In paradigm II (PII), the infre-
have not only theoretical, but also clinical implications for quent checkerboard stimuli (64 x 64caskets, 12.5'of visual
the P300 potentials. Furthermore, the influence on the age- angle) were defined as target, and the subjects had to silently
related P300 changes of both gender and specific subjects' count only these stimuli (active condition of "selective
states, such as transient or selective attention, needs further attention"). The counting error was determined as the mean
clarification. In this study, we tried to address these issues by difference between the subjects' counts (SC) and the counts
means of visual event-related P300 potentials elicited in two of the computer (CC) of the task-relevant B-stimuli for both
different paradigms. sessions according to the formula:
SC1-CC1 I + ISC2-CC2
1
>Sk i, n A
ing the P300 peak. The P300 amplitude was determined as the more the MSC approximates zero, the better is the fit
the voltage difference between the N250 and P300 peaks, provided by the model. Finally, scatterplots of the residuals
respectively. The latencies of the N250 and P300 compo- of y against the fitted values of y were performed to visually
nents and the P300 amplitudes were manually measured by assess the fit of the aging-P300 interaction by a given
one experienced investigator with the help of electronic regression model. More details are given in the Results
cursors. As previously shown (Taghavy and Kiigler, 1988a; section and the corresponding tables, as applicable.
Taghavy et al., 1988; Kugler et al., 1994), the N250 and
P300 latencies are closely linked to stimulus discrimination RESULTS
and processing time, whereas the P300 amplitudes are sensi-
20-
IS-
16-
14-
Table 3. P300 Dynamics Between Paradigm I and II
12-
in the Four Age Groups (AG I-IV)
10-
AGI AG II AG III AG IV
(18-37) (38-57) (58-77) (78-98) p-value
6-
N250 latency difference (Pll-Pl) (ms)
AC I AC II AC III AC IV
-22.5* -19.1* -30.6* -28.5* .4188
±20.0 ±17.3 ±29.9 ±35.5
P300 latency difference (Pll-Pl) (ms) Figure 2. Means and standard deviations of the N250, P300 latencies,
and P300 amplitudes (paradigm II). The N250 and P300 latencies are
-3.7 0.06 -7.6 14.1 .5675 prolonged with age and have higher variabilities. By contrast, the P300
±24.2 ±24.2 ±43.3 ±24.1 amplitudes are reduced in the older age groups and show smaller variabili-
ties. Similar results were also obtained for paradigm I.
P300 amplitude difference (Pll-Pl) (u,V)
380
380-
360
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE AGE
380' 380
360
360-
340
340 320
320 300
N2L (PI)
280-1 N2L(PII)
300 260
280-1 240
220
260
200
240 180
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE AGE
Figure 4. Comparison of three different regression models for the aging-P300 interactions of both P300 paradigms. A, N250 latencies; B, P300 latencies;
C, P300 amplitudes. Given are linear, second- and third-order polynomial regression functions (from top to bottom) for the N250 (A), the P300 latencies (B),
and the P300 amplitudes (C) of both paradigm 1 (left) and PII (right). Overlap in the values of the scatter plots is handled by the method of fine cellulacion
showing the number of the same values at a given point by the number of leaflets in sunflower symbols. Aging is obviously associated with an accelerating
prolongation of the N250 and P300 latencies and a decelerating, yet relatively slight, reduction of the P300 amplitudes. These aging-P300 interactions are best
described by third-order polynomial regression functions, as indicated by the corresponding AIC values (see also Table 5). This could also be confirmed by
residual plots (Y, residuals of y; X, fitted values of y), which clearly demonstrated that nonlinear trends in the residuals vanished only after third-order
polynomial regression.
B
y = .722x + 304.23, r2 = .148 y = .959x + 291.269, r2 = .329
440 460-
440
420
400
380
360 P3L (PI) P3L (Pll)
340
i " " ."._i—-r*^r
320- • • . .
300
280 •
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE
440-
420-
400- * .
380-
360- %
P3L (PI) P3L (PII)
' " * " ^ ^ \
340-
320
300 : ; • . . . . . • •
280 •
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE
(N250 latency) and evaluation time (P300 latency), as well tion). This indicates a higher increase in stimulus evaluation
as a minor decrease in visual attention capabilities (P300 time over age under active conditions such as selective
amplitudes). The age-related P300 alterations, however, attention and task relevance. These age-related prolonga-
accelerate from about 60 years of age onward, to peak in the tions of the P300 latencies are generally smaller than in
old and oldest old. Since neither visual acuity nor the early, previous visual (P3b: Strayer et al., 1987: + 1 . 1 1 msec/yr;
stimulus-dependent components of the PVEPs (N75, P100) Pfefferbaum et al., 1984: + 1 . 3 2 msec/yr; Picton et al.,
showed any correlation with the late P300 potential compo- 1984: + 1 . 4 1 msec/yr; P3a: Pfefferbaum et al., 1984:
nents, these P300 changes did obviously not result from age- + 1.54 msec/yr), auditory (P3b: Goodin et al., 1978a: 1.8
related declines in visual sensory functions. The amount of msec/yr; Yamashita et al., 1991: + 1 . 7 msec/yr; Knight,
the average age-related P300 latency prolongation is signifi- 1987: + 1 . 2 9 msec/yr; P3a: Polich et al., 1985: + 1 . 1 4
cantly higher in paradigm II ( + .959 msec per year) than in msec/yr; novel P3: Knight, 1987: + 1 . 1 3 msec/yr), and
paradigm I ( + .722 msec per year, linear regression func- somatosensory P300 studies (P3b: Yamaguchi and Knight,
BIO KUGLER ET AL.
P3A (Pin
P3A (PI)
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE
•
14
12-
10
8 P3A (PI) P3A ( P i n
4'
2 : . . * . ^ ^
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE
• •
20 30 40 50 60 70 90 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
AGE
1991: +1.28 msec/yr; novel P3: Yamaguchi and Knight, nificant prolongations over age (see also Figures 1-3 and
1991: +1.72 msec/yr). This may not only be due to differ- Table 2). These age-related N250 latency prolongations that
ences in stimulus modality (Pfefferbaum et al., 1984; Picton ranged between .73 and .75 msec/yr for P300 paradigm I and
et al., 1984; Barrett et al., 1987) or other stimulus features, II, respectively, are in good line with those of other studies
but rather may depend on different degrees of task difficulty (Picton et al., 1984: +.64 msec/yr; Coyle et al., 1991:
(Knight, 1987), on differences in P300 measurement tech- + .90 msec/yr). The amount of these latency prolongations
niques (Fein and Turetsky, 1989), and, finally, on differ- is much greater than that of the early exogenous components
ences in the age distribution and the health status of the study such as the N75 (-.09 msec/yr) or P100 of the PVEPs (-.036
populations. msec/yr, linear regression), but smaller than that of the P300
In contrast to the large body of data on the age-related latencies of PII ( + .959 msec/yr). This also supports the
changes in P300 latency, there are only relatively few reports notion of an exceptional role of the N250 between the
on the latencies of the "preceding negativities" (N2 or exogenous primary and endogenous P300 complex
N250). In this study, the N250 latencies also revealed sig- (Taghavy and Kiigler, 1988a).
P300 DYNAMICS IN COGNITIVE BRAIN AGING Bll
Table 5. Different Kinds of Regression Models for the Best Fit Table 6. Sex Differences Between the P300 Parameters
of the Aging-P300 Interaction of Both P300 Paradigms
Table 7. Sex Differences in the Regression Functions (ms) ym = 263.462 + 3.872x - .077x2 + .001x3
Between the P300 Parameters and Age 475
450
N250 lat. P300 lat. P300 ampl.
m/f m/f m/f 425
400
Linear regression
375 males
Slope .69/.82 .79/1.15 -.O8/-.O7
350
r .547.65 .49/.66 .27/.23
r2 .29/.42 .247.44 .07/.05 325
375' females.
Third-order polynomial regression
350- A
• "A"
Intercept 191.6/256.4 263.5/326.3 -1.24/7.47 *•
325
X -4.35/.61 3.87A-.26 .97/.44
300- • • ••
x2 -.09/-.02 -.08/-.002 -.02/-.008 •
tudes. Furthermore, the aging-P300 interactions did show smaller sample of subjects (Kiigler et al., 1993b), these
higher correlation coefficients in the different kinds of re- third-order polynomial trends in the aging-P300 interactions
gression models for the females. These interesting results have emerged only after the inclusion of a larger number of
indicate that in women a higher percentage of P300 variabil- very old subjects into the analysis. The critical question,
ity can be explained solely by age, whereas in males addi- however, is what the meaning of these nonlinear aging-P300
tional factors may contribute. In contrast to Hegerl et al. interactions may be. Although a clear-cut answer as to the
(1985), who reported an age-related P300 latency increase of exact aging mechanisms resulting in a third-order polyno-
1.3 msec per year for men and of only .25 msec per year for mial rather than a linear regression function seems elusive at
women in an auditory oddball paradigm, we actually found a present, there are some lines of evidence that strongly argue
biological-health factors, the latter primarily reflects the aging. First, the P300 potentials reflect aging effects much
impact of human agency and cultural knowledge. Interest- better than the earlier, stimulus-dependent PI00 components
ingly, these two categories of intelligence display very of the PVEPs (r2: .005-.073). Second, given the complexity
different life-span courses of change (Horn, 1970). While of both the spectrum of human cognitive functions of which
the former displays an exponential decline, especially in the P300 potentials cover only a part and human brain aging, it is
elderly, the latter shows stability and even positive changes not surprising at all that a rather small percentage of the P300
in persons who reach old age without brain pathology. This variability can be explained by aging, but it is rather aston-
progressive decrease in "cognitive mechanics" appears to ishing that this figure is as high as it is. And finally, from
be in good accordance with the age-related changes in P300 another viewpoint, the fact that the P300 variability is not
Gompertz, B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human Kraiuhin, C ; Gordon, E.; Stanfield, P.; Meares, R.; Howson, A. P300and
mortality and on a new mode of determining life contingencies. Philos. the effects of aging: relevance to the diagnosis of dementia. Exp. Aging
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 11:513-585; 1825. Res. 12:187-192; 1986.
Goodin, D.S.; Squires, K.C.; Henderson, B.H.; Starr, A. Age-related Kugler, C.F.A.; Lotterer, E.; Petter, J.; Wensing, G.; Taghavy, A.; Hahn,
variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human E.G.; Fleig, W.E. Visual event-related P300 potentials in early porto-
subjects. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44:447-458; 1978a. systemic encephalopathy. Gastroenterology 103:302-310; 1992.
Goodin, D.S.; Squires, K.C.; Starr, A. Long latency event-related compo- Kugler, C.F.A.; Taghavy, A.; Platt, D. The event-related P300 potential
nents of the auditory evoked potential in dementia. Brain 101:635-641; analysis of cognitive human brain aging: a review. Gerontology
1978b. 39:280-303;1993a.
Gordon, E.; Kraiuhin, C ; Harris, A.; Meares, R.; Howson, A. The Kugler, C.F.A.; Petter, J.; Taghavy, A.; Platt, D. Electrophysiological
differential diagnosis of dementia using P300 latency. Biol. Psychiatry evidence for differential effects of aging on cognitive human brain
Squires, N.K.; Squires, K.C.; Hillyard, S.A. Two varieties of long-latency tion in different states of visual attention. Int. J. Neurosci. 39:261-274;
positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Elec- 1988.
troencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38:387-401; 1975. Toran-Allerand, C D . ; Miranda, R.C; Bentham, W.D.; Sohrabji, F.;
Squires, K.C.; Wickens, C ; Squires, N.K.; Donchin, E. The effect of Brown, T.J.; Hochberg, R.B.; MacLusky, N.J. Estrogen receptors
stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related poten- colocalize with low-affinity nerve growth factor receptors in cholinergic
tial. Science 193:1142-1146; 1976. neurons of the basal forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:4668-
Stafford, J.L.; Albert, M.S.; Naeser, M.A. Age-related differences in 4672; 1992.
computed tomographic scan measurements. Arch. Neurol. 45:409- Van Dijk, J.G.; Caekebeke, J.F.V.; Jennekens-Schinkel, A.; Zwinderman,
415;1988. A.H. Background EEG reactivity in auditory event-related potentials.
Strayer, D.L.; Wickens, C D . ; Braune, R. Adult age differences in the Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 83:44-51; 1992.
speed and capacity of information processing. 2. An electrophysiologi- Wickens, C D . ; Kramer, A.; Vanasse, L.; Donchin, E. Performance of