Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
© Copyright by the ATHENA consortium, 2015-2018. The project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under grant agreement No 691936 (H2020-TWINN-2015). More info regarding the project you can find here:
www.athena2020.eu
DISCLAIMER: This document contains material, which is the copyright of ATHENA consortium members and the European Commission, and may not
be reproduced or copied without permission, except as mandated by the European Commission Grant Agreement No 691936 for reviewing and
dissemination purposes. The information contained in this document is provided by the copyright holders "as is" and any express or implied warranties,
including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall the members
of the ATHENA consortium, including the copyright holders, or the European Commission be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special,
exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or
business interruption) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise)
arising in any way out of the use of the information contained in this document, even if advised of the possibility of such damage.
D3.3– Report of the Gap Analysis ATHENA
H2020-TWINN-2015
Grant Agreement no 691936
This project is funded under the EUROPEAN COMMISSION in the
Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020).
Project full title: Remote Sensing Science Center for Cultural Heritage
Dissemination Level
PU Public
Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Agency
CO √
Services)
Document Sign-off
Partner 2 (Work
DRAFT Gunter Schreier DLR 16/11/2016
Package Leader)
Athos Agapiou,
REVIEWED Vasiliki Lysandrou, Project Coordinator CUT 17/11/2016
Diofantos Hadjimitsis
Leader, Partner 1,
APPROVED All partners
Partner 2
none
Table of Contents
Summary ............................................................................................................................... 6
1. The ATHENA Center of Excellence Vision ...................................................................... 7
2. Introduction and Methodology ......................................................................................... 7
3. Quantifiable indicators for the Gap analysis: ................................................................... 9
4. Current Status of the CUT RS Lab .................................................................................11
5. Goals for the ATHENA Center of Excellence .................................................................13
6. Analysis of Gaps towards an ATHENA Center of Excellence .........................................15
7. Recommendations .........................................................................................................16
8. ANNEX (working) ...........................................................................................................17
Summary
The current deliverable consists of a preliminary report on the gap analysis, which is a
comparison between the current position of CUT’s Research Lab (including staff,
infrastructure etc.) and the targeted position to which ATHENA Centre of Excellence aims to
achieve, as well as the determination of the ‘distance’ between the two positions. This will
include the outline of the existing Lab’s technical and staff capabilities. The GAP analysis will
further outline the sectors that determine competitiveness, such as current infrastructures,
technology readiness and potential for innovation. It is expected that the accomplishment of
the gap analysis will then be evaluated by the partners and its outcomes will assist them in
order to guideline the Centre of Excellence to become. GAP analysis will determine what
steps need to be taken in order to transform RS Lab from its current state to its desired,
future state as ATHENA centre.
Gap analysis will consist of: (1) listing of characteristic factors (such as personnel,
performance levels, building infrastructure etc.) of the present situation ("what is"), (2) listing
factors needed to achieve future objectives ("what should be") as ATHENA centre, and then
(3) highlighting the gaps that exist and need to be filled.
According to a revised schedule decided by all consortium members of the project in regards
to the present deliverable, and for which the responsible PO of the EC has been informed,
the versions of the document and the delivery dates are as follows:
A draft scheme will be delivered in the current month (November 2016), as was
initially scheduled by the project’s deliverables timeline (DLR to send scheme/layout
of Document within the next days. To be reviewed (and partly filled) by CUT and DLR
until end November).
A full version will be submitted in April 2017.
A final/revised version will be submitted towards the end of the project (Month 34-
September 2018)
The reason for this revised schedule is based on further analysis of the status quo, a better
definition of the requirements of regional and moreover international stakeholders and to
include the findings of the spring 2017 ATHENA workshop.
A final update will be delivered towards the end of the project.
In order to reach a goal, one needs to know, where to start from and which goal should be
reached by which time. The steps to be taken from this starting point towards the defined
goal should also be clearly defined, or at least flexible in a way to adapt to a current situation,
which may appear on the way to the goal.
1. Where does the ATHENA Center of Excellence start from? What is the current basis
of the CUT RS lab in terms of intellectual capacities, performances, international
presence, personnel and equipment? This analysis is supported by previous
documents, generated in the ATHENA project (refer to D3.1). This document
summarizes and highlights the findings in a format compatible with the gap analysis.
The time of this status analysis is fixed to mid 2016.
2. What would be the vision of an ATHENA Center of Excellence? What would be its
mission statement, the personnel and equipment required to fulfil this mission? The
general vision of the ATHENA Center of Excellence need to be turned into tangible
and quantifiable items to be compared with the existing situation at the CUT RS lab.
The vision for the ATHENA Center of Excellence will be stated for three dates:
a. the short term vision: The vision at the end of the ATHENA project (Jan
2019)
b. the mid term vision/ five year roadmap: five years after the end of the project
(2024)
c. the long term vision: ten years after the end of the project (2029)
3. Steps 1 & 2 then need to be compared in order to identify the gaps between the
status and the vision of an ATHENA Center of Excellence. The gaps will be identified
based on certain topics (e.g. personal, equipment) and should be quantifiable. Unless
specifically said, the “reference” vision would be the mid term vision (i.e. 2024)
4. Finally, recommendations would be stated, how these gaps should be filled, which
efforts should be undertaken and which resources would eventually be necessary to
do these efforts.
The figure below sketches the above described approach of the gap analysis.
Step 3 will focus on the comparison Derived from the gap analysis,
of the current situation and the recommendations will be given on how to
visionary goal in order to identify the implement measures and necessary steps to
steps to be taken to achieve this goal. reach the goals.
The following table defines indicators to measure the performance of an Athena Center of
Excellence, more specifically aims to compare through these parameters the current status
with the one that Athena would like to achieve in the mid term stage.
The indicators have been developed within the ATHENA project team. Therefore,
international standards, such as the U-Multirank1, supported by the European Commission,
has been used and adapted to be used in the frame of this project.
Staffing The number of staff and the variety Number of permanent staff;
of their skills and experience is a Number of-non-permanent staff;
key factor for achieving the goals Number of guest scientists
of ATHENA
1
U-Mulitirank: http://ec.europa.eu/education/initiatives/u-multirank_en
Services ATHENA shall also generate pre- Kind of services and absolute service
operational/operational services to contract value
primarily public organizations, in Kind of service within or for
order to demonstrate the developed European programs (non-research) &
skills outside an academic contractual value
environment
Private Sector The collaboration with the private Number of private; company Partners
cooperation sector in terms of joint projects and in Cyprus
supporting SMEs will be an Number of private; company Partners
important factor for income and in Europe and globally
sustainability of ATHENA
Science Number and kind of specific The Centre will provide tbd
science/technology projects. new theories /
Number of new, innovative methodologies /
7. Recommendations
8. ANNEX (working)