Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Boston University African Studies Center is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to The International Journal of African Historical Studies
This content downloaded from 213.55.79.195 on Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:08:02 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
BOOK REVIEWS 185
JEREMY RICH
Cabrini College
This content downloaded from 213.55.79.195 on Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:08:02 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
186 BOOK REVIEWS
This content downloaded from 213.55.79.195 on Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:08:02 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
BOOK REVIEWS 187
BELINDA DODSON
As its title implies, this collection is wide-ranging in scope, its chapters so diverse
in geographic location, topic, and study design that at first glance the fact that
they are grouped in the (wide) category of microdemographic research seems to
be their only commonality. This multidisciplinary approach has the potential
advantage of attracting a wide readership from academic and policy realms.
Demographers, sociologists, anthropologists, geographers, economists, family
planning planners, and reproductive health workers interested in fertility change
in Africa will all find theoretical, methodological, and programmatic aspects of
interest. Perhaps inevitably, this diversity makes some of the chapters less acces-
sible to those outside the specific field of their authors. Without the final, summa-
rizing chapter this book would be more useful for its parts than taken whole, but
framing the preceding chapters in terms of the fertility transition, John and Pat
Caldwell succeed in bringing together the disparate studies.
The diversity is intentional, and serves the editors' two main objectives.
First, the methodological and disciplinary mix serves to re-orient microde-
mographic research away from solely qualitative approaches, "blending both
numerical and non-numerical data" (p. 2). Second, by soliciting these original
works, the editors demonstrate the use of microdemographic studies across sub-
regions of the continent (except Central Africa) and across populations at differ-
ent stages in fertility transition. In a sense, the editors have issued a challenge to
their readers-to devise locally relevant and robust research designs at the
This content downloaded from 213.55.79.195 on Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:08:02 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms