This latest statement of yours have exposed the have cooked knowledge of Darwin's

Theory. First my suggestion would be to study what Darwin proposed. Then we can
comment on the hypothesis of Natural selection and Survival of fittest. His theory
mentions the progression due to evolutions from H. habilis and H. gautengensis to
H. rudolfensis and H. georgicus to H. ergaster and H. erectus to H. cepranensis and
H. antecessor to H. heidelbergensis to H. rhodesiensis, and the Gawis cranium to
Neanderthal and Denisovan to H. floresiensis and finally to H. sapiens. This theory
is rejected by modern sceientist based on archeological and experimental evidences.
So the Story of Darwinism has already being doomed inscientific circles. Now people
like you who are not updated still believe in him, not any informed person or any
archeologist or scientist with proper education.

Please listen to Thomas Huxley, who was one of the most vigorous supporter of
Darwin

�Evolution is not an established theory but a tentative hypothesis....#It is not

universally accepted.�

Darwin himself has written in one of the letters to A. R. Wallace (Dec.22 1857)
which sums up all his findings as mere mental speculation.

�I am a firm believer that without speculation there is no good and original

observation.�

Darwin mentions in a letter, regarding the concluding chapters of �The Origin of

the Species� (1858) as

�You will be greatly disappointed. It (forthcoming book) will be grievously too

hypothetical.�

Darwin himself confesses towards his end of life as

"�Not one change of species into another is on record...we cannot prove that a
single species has changed."

Stephen J. Gould, a leading evolutionist noted about the Darwin's Theory that �The
idea that an arm could evolve into a wing is absurd.�

Dr. Fleischman, an Erlangen Zoologist mentions that �The Darwinian theory is not
the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination.�

In 1979 Evolutionists said Mycoplasma genitalium were of �special evolutionary

interest because of their#extremely simple cell structure.� During 80s and early
90s, extensive research was carried## out on Mycoplasma genitalium. In 1996 the
same microbiologist agreed that �Mycoplasma genitalium can no longer be thought of
as simple organisms.�

�The theory of evolution suffers from grave defects, which are becoming more and
more apparent as time advances.� Albert Fleishman,#Professor of Comparative
Anatomy,#Earlangan University

Darwin himself mentioned that �If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ
existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight
modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.�
Once thought to be a simple bag of chemicals, the cell is now understood to be an
elaborate system of molecular machinery that surpasses a modern city in complexity.
If we dive deep into the subject then we can understand how Darwin's theory of
evolution falis by his above statement itself.

�Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups.� Bounoure, Director, National Center

of Scientific Research, France

Hope this will give you enough knowledge to understand Darwin and his theory.

See the point is we can wake up a sleeping person but if a person pretends to be
sleeping, nothing can be done to wake him up as he is not sleeping in first
instance. Similarly the so called logicians( or should i call illogicians) who dont
use their logic and use it just to suit their propaganda which they want to
believe. But if you want to know truth dont subit your logical thinking to any one
else like scientist or pseudo philosopher or mental speculators.

Now coming back to your point of going back 100-300 years back in Kerala history,
there also it proves that we were highly technologically advanced. Take for eg
Kalari, there is no more sophisticated martial art like that the marma techniques
and other things which existed was so intricate that we dont have complete
knowledge even now. it was the British political domination which dealt a deathblow
to the tradition of Kalaripayattu. In the year 1792 the British had established
their supremacy over Malabar, North Kerala. The new rulers banned Kalaripayattu in
1793 after suppressing a local uprising. In 1804 the British authorities passed an
order that those who concealed weapons or defied the ban on carrying arms would be
deported for life. The same measures were resorted to in quelling an uprising in
Travancore in Southern Kerala. The British successfully brought this traditional
military system to an end by banning it completely.
The technique used to building temples and palaces were simply astonishing even to
the modern architects.

The more you study about the old history of India and other parts of world, you can
do nothing but marvel at their technological advancement. I can recommand a link to
start understanding our human heritage.

http://archaeologyonline.net/artifacts/scientific-verif-vedas

Now it is up to you whether you want to open up, explore unexplored territories or
you want to just stick to the old rusted informaton which you have. Before
rejecting anything a proper logical person will inspect and explore and cross
examine, I am humbly requesting all the intelligent persons like you to do the
same.