0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
5 Ansichten1 Seite
i. The document discusses cultural relativism and whether there are objective standards to judge moral codes between societies. It presents arguments that no objective standards exist and societies should tolerate differences.
ii. Challenges to this view are that some basic moral rules are necessary for societies to coexist, and a society's beliefs may not reflect objective truth. Additionally, without standards progress cannot be measured and not all practices deserve tolerance.
iii. An objective standard could be whether a practice promotes or hinders people's welfare, allowing criticism when a practice is unacceptable while still acknowledging cultural differences.
i. The document discusses cultural relativism and whether there are objective standards to judge moral codes between societies. It presents arguments that no objective standards exist and societies should tolerate differences.
ii. Challenges to this view are that some basic moral rules are necessary for societies to coexist, and a society's beliefs may not reflect objective truth. Additionally, without standards progress cannot be measured and not all practices deserve tolerance.
iii. An objective standard could be whether a practice promotes or hinders people's welfare, allowing criticism when a practice is unacceptable while still acknowledging cultural differences.
i. The document discusses cultural relativism and whether there are objective standards to judge moral codes between societies. It presents arguments that no objective standards exist and societies should tolerate differences.
ii. Challenges to this view are that some basic moral rules are necessary for societies to coexist, and a society's beliefs may not reflect objective truth. Additionally, without standards progress cannot be measured and not all practices deserve tolerance.
iii. An objective standard could be whether a practice promotes or hinders people's welfare, allowing criticism when a practice is unacceptable while still acknowledging cultural differences.
i. Different societies have i. There will be no standards. i. Despite the differences in different moral codes. One can always cite that cultural practices, “there are ii. The moral code of a society argument. some moral rules that all determines what is right ii. The conclusion does not societies must embrace, within that society. follow from the premise. because those rules are iii. There is no objective There might still be an necessary for society to exist.” standard that can be used to objective truth behind it. ii. There is a “difference between judge one society’s code as E.g. Flat earth and sphere what a society believes about better than another’s. earth argument. morals and what is really true. iv. The moral code of our own iii. We would also be barred The moral code of a society is society has no special status; from criticizing other closely tied to what people in it is but one among many. cultural practices. that society believe to be right. v. It is arrogant for us to judge iv. Likewise, it would bar us However, that code, and those Cultural Relativism other cultures. We should from criticizing our own people, can be in error.” always be tolerant of them. practices. No room for iii. How do we judge a practice to changes, and other cultural be unacceptable? Ask: Does the infusions. practice promote or hinder the v. Moral progress will be put welfare of the people affected by into question. Without it? This becomes your standards, how can one objective standard. gauge progress – how can iv. One cannot generalize or one gauge what is better equalize all moral codes. Some now than before? might be the best, some might be worst. v. Tolerance is good. But, do not tolerate everything.