Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
08: Aerodynamics
Two of them are aerodynamic forces created by the pressure and shear stress distributions over the
aircraft surface mostly on the wings. These two are Lift and Drag and can be defined as:
Lift (L) – is a force that is produced by the dynamic effect of the air acting on the airfoil, and acts
perpendicular to the flight path through the center of lift and perpendicular to the lateral axis. In level
flight, lift opposes the downward force of weight.
Drag (D) – a rearward, retarding force caused by disruption of airflow by the wing, rotor, fuselage, and
other protruding objects. As a general rule, drag opposes thrust and acts rearward parallel to the relative
wind.
2
Both Lift and Drag depends at least on:
To compute for Lift and Drag we will use the derived formula for each force. This is:
Where:
CL – is the Coefficient of Lift which is a f (α, Re, Mꝏ) where Re is Reynolds Number.
CD – is the Coefficient of Drag which is a f (α, Re, Mꝏ) where Re is Reynolds Number.
Where,
At sea level the coefficient of dynamic viscosity is 1.7894x10-5 kg/m(s) or 3.7373x10-7 slug/ft(s).
Since as altitude increases, temperature decreases, the µꝏ is also changing. Hence, Reynolds Number
changes as altitude also changes.
Both CL and CD are dimensionless numbers which relates the lift and drag generated by a body to the fluid
around the body. These coefficients can be determined by the Airfoil profile (for wings and stabilizer),
fuselage shape and length, and other protruding objects on an aircraft (antenna, landing gear, and etc.).
For ease, both the coefficients can be found using a program called 3Xflr5.
Coefficient of Lift
Wing
First, we must compute the corresponding Reynolds Number per altitude and Mach Number which is
required for the program. Since Reynolds Number is a function of density and the coefficient of dynamic
viscosity which both change with altitude, Reynolds Number also changes with altitude. The value for V ꝏ
Freestream Velocity will correspond to the value of Cruising Velocity (Vc) computed in Report 6.
Vc = 120.0329355 knots = 202.5927717 ft/s
3 http://www.xflr5.com/xflr5.htm.
Name: Pabs V. Fernandez Report No. 08: Aerodynamics
Putting the following Reynolds Number to the program resulted in the following graphs. These
graphs are calculated from airfoils with Infinite Wings.
Since all aircrafts have finite wings, we will make a correction for the Cl (lower case L represent the
Infinite Wing) vs angle of attack graph for the Finite wing analysis. First we must calculate the Oswald
Efficiency Factor of our Aircraft. The Oswald efficiency, similar to the span efficiency, is a correction factor
that represents the change in drag with lift of a three-dimensional wing or airplane, as compared with an
ideal wing having the same aspect ratio and an elliptical lift distribution.4 The equation which we will use
to calculate the Oswald Efficiency Factor of our Aircraft is as follows:
Straight-Wing Aircraft: ℯ = 1.78(1-0.045AR0.68) – 0.64
Since my aircraft is a straight-wing meaning no sweep angle (ɅLE) I will use the first equation. My Aspect
Ratio (AR) = 10.2 from the previous report. Applying this to the equation yields:
Now we can apply this factor to the Aspect Ratio Correction. The effect of a finite wing is to reduce the lift
curve slope. Here we will use this 5equation:
ɑ0
ɑ=
1+57.3 ɑ0/πℯ𝐴𝑅
Where: ɑ - Lift Slope for the Finite Wing. ℯ - Computed Oswald Efficiency Factor
4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_efficiency_number
5 John D. Anderson, Jr, Introduction to Flight 3rd ed., (McGraw-Hill Book Company: 1989), p.225
Name: Pabs V. Fernandez Report No. 08: Aerodynamics
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1 Cl (Infinite)
Cl (Finite)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55
𝑥
L = L0 √1 −( )2
𝑏/2
Where:
L – is the Lift per unit x.
L0 – Centreline Lift.
b – Wing Span
To find the centreline lift, we must assign first the angle of incidence. Assigning the angle of
incidence is based on the aerodynamic efficiency and aircraft attitude during cruise condition. There is
one method to determine the angle of incidence. By using the Weight and CG Limits of the aircraft we
already computed in the previous report.
Name: Pabs V. Fernandez Report No. 08: Aerodynamics
Weight
CL Angle of Attack LEMAC
(lbs)
750.15 0.271222212 1.844083983 1.053846922
691.3619968 0.24996698 1.606562467 1.20878825
710.1499968 0.256759918 1.682021437 0.849562856
633.1499968 0.228920006 1.036501787 0.927755323
574.3619968 0.207664775 1.140877815 1.10135294
723.1558688 0.261462286 1.734257423 1.085472868
683.1558688 0.246999994 1.573603878 0.874968505
619.6529328 0.224040044 1.32278155 0.943463114
560.8649328 0.202784813 1.086669036 1.122884748
717.4749968 0.259408326 1.711441117 1.136790816
655.8296168 0.237119988 1.044701558 1.057536504
673.1499968 0.243382298 1.533416908 1.150760588
736.7636408 0.266382276 1.788910843 1.069240527
Now we will construct the Angle of Attack versus LEMAC graph. Whichever is lowest will be our chosen
angle of incidence.
Name: Pabs V. Fernandez Report No. 08: Aerodynamics
Using this equation we will now compute for the ideal Lift per unit span using the previous equation.
x Lift Per Unit x x Lift Per Unit x
0 43.52463938 10 36.0378247
1 43.45615651 11 34.2583454
2 43.25005729 12 32.19674304
3 42.90435858 13 29.79451134
4 42.41564718 14 26.96075225
5 41.77890469 15 23.54013655
6 40.98723265 16 19.22187574
7 40.03144033 17 13.14950939
8 38.89943189 17.835 0
9 37.57528442
Using your chosen Wing Twist we must now compute the Actual Lift per unit Span of our wing using the
above derived equation for Lift. The Data are as follows:
Chord
x Angle of Attack CL Lift per Unit Span
(ft)
0 4.4
1 4.330508333
2 4.243575
3 4.14175
4 4.046716667
5 3.962025
6 3.878233333
7 3.795458333
8 3.715066667
9 3.637791667
10 3.565075
11 3.495683333
12 3.4053
13 3.298933333
14 3.206408333
15 3.125875
16 3.046058333
17 2.299383333
17.835 0 0 0 0
Name: Pabs V. Fernandez Report No. 08: Aerodynamics
Stabilizer
The Parasite Drag for the stabilizers can also be gathered the data from the Xlfr5 program. Here we
will base our data when our stabilizers at zero angle of attack. Both the Horizontal and Vertical stabilizers
have the same airfoil profile so we will have a consistent coefficient of drag. From the data we have:
At Zero Angle of Attack CD,O Stabilizers =
9
A tail surface with a hinged rudder or elevator will have a form factor about 10% higher than the
predicted CD. Also an additional four to five percent may be assumed for the interference factor. So our CD
will become:
CD,O Stabilizers =
For calculating the parasite drag of the fuselage, landing gear, cockpit/canopy and other parts of
the aircraft, we will use the Component Buildup Method. 10The component buildup method estimates the
subsonic parasite drag of each component of the aircraft using a calculated flat-plate skin friction drag
coefficient (Cf) and a component “form factor” (FF) that estimates the pressure drag due to viscous
separation. Then the interference effects on the component drag are estimated as a factor “Q” and the
total component drag is determined as the product of the Wetted Area (SWET), Cf, FF, and Q.
Miscellaneous drags (CD misc) for special features of an aircraft such as flaps, unretracted landing
gear, an upswept aft fuselage, and base area are then estimated and added to the total, along with
estimated contributions for leakages and protuberances (CD L&P).
The subsonic parasite-drag buildup equation is now:
𝛴𝐶𝑓𝑐 𝐹𝐹𝐶 𝑄𝐶 𝑆𝑊𝐸𝑇 𝐶
(CD O)Subsonic =( ) + 𝐶𝐷𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑐 + 𝐶𝐷 𝐿&𝑃
𝑆𝑅𝑒𝑓
Where:
SRef – Wing Reference Area.
Using this equation we can now compute the Parasite Drag of each component of my aircraft.
12
−5
Computing for the Cut-off Reynolds Number yields using k = 0.17 x 10 (ft) for Smooth Molded
Composite, yields:
20.75583333 𝑓𝑡 1.052
Re = 38.21 ( ) = 1089873859
0.17 𝑥 10−5 𝑓𝑡
The lower the actual Reynolds Number and the cut-off Reynolds Number will be used for computing the
Skin Friction Coefficient. Here the actual is the lowest so it will be used for the computation.
The equation for computing the Skin Friction Coefficient is divided between Laminar and Turbulent
Flow. We will assume a turbulent flow for the fuselage, so we will use this equation:
0.455
Cf =
𝑙𝑜𝑔10 𝑅)2.58 (1+0.144𝑀2 )0.65
Computing for the Skin Friction Coefficient of the fuselage using the same Mach Number at sea level as th
Wing Reynolds Number:
0.455
Cf,Fuselage =
(𝑙𝑜𝑔10 26744552.88)2.58 (1+0.144(0.1814877636)2 )0.65
= 2.570049589 x 10-3
Fuselage Component Form Factor (FFFUSELAGE)
For computing the Form Factor for the fuselage we will use the equation:
60 𝑓
FF = (1 + 3 + )
𝑓 400
𝑙 1
Where: f = = 𝐴𝑀𝐴𝑋 is the maximum frontal area of the component.
𝑑 4
√ (𝐴𝑀𝐴𝑋 )
𝜋
20.75583333 𝑓𝑡
Computing for the f of the fuselage yields: f = = 4.111035756
4
√ (18.72939375 𝑓𝑡 2 )
𝜋
11
Daniel P. Raymer, Aircraft Design – A Conceptual Approach (AIAA:1992), p.282
12
Daniel P. Raymer, Aircraft Design – A Conceptual Approach (AIAA:1992), p.283
Name: Pabs V. Fernandez Report No. 08: Aerodynamics
We can now compute the landing gear parasite drag coefficient of our aircraft. Using the Equation,
we will first compute for the Landing Gear (LDG) Strut and Wheel & Tire Parasite Drag Coefficient: