Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Editorial Projects in Education (EPE) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization based in Bethesda, Md. Its primary
mission is to help raise the level of awareness and understanding among professionals and the public of important issues
in American education. EPE covers local, state, national, and international news and issues from preschool through the
12th grade. Editorial Projects in Education publishes Education Week, America’s newspaper of record for precollegiate
education, the online Teacher, EdWeek Market Brief, and the TopSchoolJobs employment resource. It also produces
periodic special reports on issues ranging from technology to textbooks, as well as books of special interest to educators.
The Education Week Research Center conducts surveys, collects data, and performs analyses that appear
in Education Week and special reports such as Quality Counts, and Technology Counts. The center also conducts
independent research studies and maintains the Education Counts online data resource.
REPORT: Holly Kurtz, Director, Education Week Research Center - Sterling Lloyd, Assistant Director – Alex Harwin, Research Analyst– Olivia Blomstrom, Research Intern
Asked which three things would most improve school safety, teachers were most likely to call for professional
mental health support, social-emotional learning strategies, and programs to help parents address students'
SEL challenges.
When it comes to improving school safety, teachers' biggest asks of lawmakers are more funding for mental
health resources and mandates requiring social-emotional learning.
Although teachers clearly perceive that mental health resources and social-emotional learning are most likely to
improve safety, the most common safety strategies currently used by schools are active shooter drills, or other
evacuation, lockdown, or shelter-in-place procedures. Trainings in evacuations, lockdowns and similar
procedures are the most common type of safety-related professional development.
About a quarter of teachers own guns. Although gun-owners are significantly more likely to support arming
teachers, just 13 percent are in favor of this approach, as compared to 2 percent of non-gun owners.
Teachers who own guns are more likely to work in small, rural districts in the Southern United States. Gun
ownership is more common among secondary teachers and those who specialize in Career Technical Education
and history/social studies.
Although most schools do provide professional mental health supports, just 34 percent offer SEL and only 15
percent have programs that help parents improve their children's social-emotional skills.
Regardless of whether their schools offer formal SEL programs, most teachers do try to improve social-
emotional well-being by using such strategies as helping students build connections with one another or
encouraging them to reach out to isolated or friendless peers.
Just one teacher said that dealing with students' mental health challenges is outside the scope of her
professional role. Common teacher responses to student mental health issues include speaking with the child,
making referrals to mental health professionals, or seeking such professionals' advice.
Overall, most teachers say their schools have adequate resources to support student mental health. However,
the percentage of respondents who say support is adequate varies significantly by grade level, from 49 percent
for elementary teachers to 65 percent in high schools. And just 14 percent of teachers say they themselves are
very or extremely well-prepared to address student mental health.
Less than half of teachers say the solutions or strategies they employ are sufficient to help students with weak
social-emotional skills. High school teachers are significantly more likely to say they lack such strategies and
also more likely to perceive that their SEL curriculum is inadequate.
Teachers' top SEL-related challenge is that a focus on academics leaves limited time for social-emotional
learning. Teachers also struggle to help students experiencing problems at home.
The teacher social-emotional learning and safety survey was produced with support from the NoVo Foundation.
If students and teachers do not feel safe, it is Survey Administered: April 2019
difficult for learning to occur. But how safe do
they really feel? And what do teachers think Sample: Nationally-representative
would improve that sense of safety? Is it
another security camera, an additional active
shooter drill? A social-emotional learning Respondents: Preschool, elementary, middle school, and high
program? Resources for student mental health? school teachers
What are schools doing now to make schools
safer? In the eyes of teachers, how adequate Total Respondents: 697
are their efforts?
® BROUGHT TO YOU BY
®
VISI T SEC ON DSTE P. ORG
How safe do you believe that your students typically feel at
Sense of Safety at School your school?
Learning may take a back seat to fear if
students do not feel safe at school.
44%
54% 35%
Restorative practices 9%
Monitoring of students’ use of school
computer networks or social media 9%
Mentoring programs for students
provided by community organizations 8%
Electronic system that alerts you to a
potentially dangerous situation 5%
Armed teachers 5%
At least one security guard (not a police
officer) assigned to our school 4%
Metal detectors 2%
26%
22%
Security cameras
25%
11%
Locale
Urban 22%
Suburban 11%
Rural/town 10%
Monitored/ 9%
reinforced
11%
doors/physical
barriers 18%
4%
Metal detectors 1%
1%
4%
Restorative
14%
practices
18%
Other 10%
Suburban 36%
Urban 44%
Midwest 81%
Northeast 76%
South 69%
40%
Improve or harden
building security
25%
51%
They are significantly less likely to say safety
Require social and emotional
legislation priorities should include mandating 70%
learning programs
social-emotional learning or funding additional
mental health resources. That said, additional 60%
funding for mental health is the top school
safety legislation priority for gun owners and
non-gun owners alike.
23%
Interestingly, teachers who live in households
with guns but don’t personally own firearms, Arm school staff 11%
are more likely than gun owners or those who
live in gun-free households to say SEL should 3%
be mandated.
2%
Ban the possession of guns in our
country, except by the police and 5%
other authorized persons
24%
Establishing a
success. The curriculum in all three
components engages students, taps
Foundation of Safety
into current research, and employs
best teaching practices.
Feeling unsafe at school affects a student’s the emotional intelligence needed for Appropriations Committee drafting an
ability to learn, focus, and take academic healthy relationships, academic success, unprecedented $260 million budget
risks. School safety is a growing concern successful careers, and heightened to fund SEL-related professional
for many teachers, and many see a strong overall happiness. development, continued research,
connection between social-emotional increased mental health presence, and
learning (SEL) and students feeling safe Growing Support for SEL support for community schools.
and supported in the classroom. There is The documented benefits of SEL are wide
mounting interest in providing students ranging. In a review of 213 school-based SEL and Your School
with mental health support and strategies SEL programs, students demonstrated There are a number of excellent programs
to strengthen social-emotional skills, but significantly improved social-emotional dedicated to teaching social-emotional
although many educators agree it should skills, attitudes, and behavior, lower levels of skills, and a number of things to consider
be a part of their role to teach these skills, anxiety, and an average 11-percentile-point when determining the best fit for your
far fewer feel equipped to do so well. gain in academic achievement compared school or district. Before initiating a
to students who did not participate in search, it’s critically important to establish
What Exactly Is SEL? an SEL program.1 From a purely financial readiness to adopt and sustain an explicit
SEL teaches the non-academic skills standpoint, SEL interventions show an SEL program. Do you have key stakeholder
and strategies that contribute to a average return on investment of $11 for representation on your selection
positive school climate and set the every dollar spent on a program.2 committee to ensure broad-based support
groundwork for positive experiences for implementation?
beyond the classroom. SEL isn’t just a These results have sparked a growing
feel-good activity, and it’s not a substitute interest in SEL in recent years, and
for academic subjects. It focuses on today nearly half of the US departments
improving cooperation, communication, of education incorporate SEL in some BROUGHT TO YOU BY
and decision making. In the long run, form. There is also mounting support
SEL provides a framework for developing from the federal level, with the US House
®
When it comes to making your selection, and child protection programs that • Make it a team effort. The support
be sure any programs you consider are focus on specific prevention and of a core leadership team helps ensure
based on research. The SEL field has come intervention goals are also offered. continued backing for SEL over time, even
a long way in creating curricula proven when there are staff changes. Meeting
to be effective—make the best use of How to Sustain an SEL Program frequently to address challenges and
your resources with the best chance of Social-emotional learning efforts need sending out feedback surveys help identify
positive outcomes for students by limiting to be sustained over the long term to where support is needed.
your search to research- and evidence- effectively develop the skill set, but
• Involve new staff or teachers. Put a
based programs. Training requirements barriers include staff turnover, limited
plan in place for getting incoming staff
and resources, ongoing implementation time, and scarce resources. SEL can’t be
on board with SEL—new staff often
supports, delivery mechanism (who will an afterthought—it requires planning and
bring new ideas and energy, and can
teach SEL and when), and budget are purposeful implementation.
contribute their strengths to your SEL
also key factors. And if you’re trying to
implementation team.
meet certain SEL standards, ensure that Four key efforts contribute to
the programs you’re considering align districtwide sustainability:
Set Up For Success
accordingly, while taking other major
• Explicitly align SEL with your vision When students are better equipped to
district initiatives into account as well.
and mission. If SEL isn’t seen as highly manage their own emotions, form positive
connected to your vision and mission, then relationships, and cope with everyday
Schools need strategies to help foster a
strive to make its value more visible in your social and academic challenges, they’re
safe and supportive learning environment,
district’s continuous improvement plans better equipped not just to learn, but
and SEL is a promising place to start.
and strategic goals. to contribute to a safe classroom and
Rooted in SEL, Second Step is a research-
school climate. And with a foundation
based program committed to • Establish and maintain buy-in. Sharing
of strong social-emotional skills, they’re
transformative impact, taking a holistic data and student testimonials and asking
better prepared to become not just better
approach in helping schools transform into active supporters to share their positive
students, but better people. To learn
environments where children can thrive. experiences are all ways to foster support
more about SEL and Second Step, visit
Building on the foundation of skills taught for SEL from staff and families alike.
SecondStep.org
in Second Step, related bullying prevention,
1. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact 2. Belfield, C. et al. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional learning. New York: Center for
of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal Benefit-Cost Studies in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
“
interventions. Child Development, 82(1): 405-432.
How We Know
Second Step SEL Second Step Bullying Prevention
When students are better equipped to Research shows that feeling unsafe at Our Programs
manage their own emotions, form positive school affects a student’s ability to learn, Work
relationships, make good decisions, and focus, and take academic risks. Because
We've become internationally
cope with everyday social and academic safety and student success are on the
recognized in social-emotional
challenges, they’re better equipped line, we’ve been unwavering in our work to
learning by ensuring all our
to learn. prevent bullying.
programs are based on
rigorous research. Independent
studies consistently show our
programs improve safety skills,
increase positive social behavior,
reduce bullying, and decrease
classroom disruptions.
© 2019 Committtee for Children | Second Step is a registered trademark of Committee for Children | #0962A
Which of the following does your school have? Select all that
What are Schools Actually apply.
Doing to Keep Students
Safe? Active shooter drills or evacuation,
lockdown, shelter-in-place training 85%
Hardening Measure Most Common
Counselors, school psychologists, or
other mental health professionals 83%
Teachers clearly perceive that mental health
resources and social-emotional learning should Security cameras 80%
be the top school safety priorities.
Training/pd for teachers on school
safety policies and practices 62%
Yet of 19 school safety measures included on
the survey, the most common approach Monitoring of students’ use of school
employed is to implement active shooter drills computer networks or social media 61%
or other evacuation, lockdown, or shelter-in-
Monitored or reinforced school doors or
place training. Eighty-five percent of teachers
other physical barriers 60%
say their schools offer this type of training.
Mental health resources are the second most Electronic system that alerts you to a
potentially dangerous situation
41%
common approach (83 percent). Teachers say
such resources should be the top school safety Strategies to improve students’ sense
priority for schools and lawmakers alike. of belonging in the school community
40%
Anonymous tip lines or a threat
Less than half of teachers say their schools use reporting system
34%
SEL-related strategies such as anti-bullying
programs (49 percent), strategies to improve Social and emotional learning
programs or strategies
34%
students’ sense of belonging (40 percent), or
social-emotional learning programs (34 Conflict resolution programs
percent). for students
28%
Mentoring programs for students
Programs to help parents address students’
provided by community organizations
22%
SEL challenges are among the top three
measures that teachers say would improve Restorative practices 19%
school safety.
At least one security guard (not a police
Yet just 15 percent of survey respondents say officer) assigned to our school 16%
their schools have such programs.
Programs to help parents address
students’ social-emotional challenges
15%
Metal detectors 4%
Armed teachers 2%
20%
SEL programs/
37%
strategies
39%
11%
Restorative
24%
practices
21%
Programs to help
9%
parents address
19%
students' SEL
challenges 16%
4%
Armed teachers 3%
0%
27%
Restorative practices 23%
11%
23%
At least one security guard (not a
17%
police officer) assigned to our school
10%
19%
Programs to help parents address
19%
students' SEL challenges
10%
0%
Armed teachers 0%
4%
14%
Metal detectors 3%
1%
0%
Armed teachers 0%
3%
69%
Monitored or reinforced school 73%
doors or other physical barriers 57%
43%
49%
Social and emotional 35%
learning strategies 26%
36%
43%
At least one sworn police
41%
officer/SRO assigned
53%
to our school
32%
25%
At least one security guard (not
9%
a police officer) assigned
to our school 16%
14%
25%
23%
Restorative practices
9%
24%
5%
6%
Metal detectors
4%
0%
Grade Level
High school 76%
Middle 82%
Elementary 90%
Just two people responded that they would do Sought information/advice from a
nothing because it is not their role as a teacher. counselor/social worker/psychologist 41%
Other 5%
12%
Contacted the
20%
student's family
26%
Math 41%
Science 44%
Music/art/
fine arts 41%
History/
social studies 37%
Math 24%
47%
Referred the student to a
counselor/social 50%
worker/psychologist
36%
22%
Contacted the
student's family
27%
16%
West 28%
Northeast 20%
Midwest 19%
South 15%
Other 4%
16%
Contacted student's family 30%
49%
16%
Encouraged peers/a peer to
18%
reach out to the student
29%
High Middle Elementary
Music/art/
fine arts 38%
Math 14%
43%
Contacted the
student's family
38%
31%
Eighty percent of survey respondents from Teachers from districts with fewer than 2,500 students
rural districts are also from smaller districts
with fewer than 2,500 students. Compare that
to 32 percent of those from suburban districts
and 18 percent from urban areas. Urban 50%
So it makes sense that, like those from smaller
districts, respondents from rural areas are less
likely to contact families.
39%
Sought
41%
information/advice
from other teachers 28%
50%
39%
Contacted the 36%
student's family 25%
48%
Yet that share falls to less than half for High 65%
elementary teachers.
Middle 53%
Elementary 49%
History/social
12% 77% 12%
studies
English/language
8% 83% 8%
arts
Career-technical
12% 80% 8%
education
Just in case teachers might have a less biased All students can 69%
picture of their peers than themselves, and should have
respondents were also asked to rate their strong SEL skills 66%
colleagues’ SEL-related attitudes and skills.
Respondents rated their colleagues’ SEL skills
slightly higher than their own.
Have adequate
solutions and
43%
strategies to use
when students do
40%
not have strong
SEL skills
46%
I am good at helping students
50%
develop strong SEL skills
59%
History/
social studies 85%
English/
language arts 82%
Science 73%
Math 55%
Mentoring 25%
7%
37%
Mental health 33%
23%
36%
Mentoring 27%
18%
Science 20%
Other 9%
History/
social studies 32%
English/
language arts 29%
Science 25%
Math 17%
Midwest 8%
South 5%
West 1%
Grade Level
27%
52%
20%
General education
(elementary, all subjects) 33%
Mathematics 10%
Special education 9%
Music/art/fine arts 6%
History/social studies 6%
Physical education 6%
Science 5%
Career-technical education 4%
Foreign language 1%
Computer science 1%
Other 8%
33%
32%
18%
49%
33%
27%
44%
30%
29%
29%
49%
26%
Personally own
Other household member owns
No gun owned
English/
14% 43% 43%
language arts
Personally own
Other household member owns
No gun owned