Location: _____________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF RATINGS
NUMERICAL DESCRIPTIVE
SUB-AREAS RATING RATING
A. Involvement of Industry in Curriculum
Development and Planning
B. Involvement of Practitioners in the Teaching
Process
C. On-the-Job-Training
D. Resources Sharing Between School and Industry
E. LCU-LGU Industry Partnership for Job Placement
and Employment
F. Continuous Search for Industry Partners
G. Entrepreneurship
TOTAL:
AREA MEAN/ RATING:
__________________________ ____________________________
__________________________ ____________________________
__________________________ ____________________________
____________________________ ____________________________
___________________________ ____________________________
Page | 101
EVALUATIVE CRITERIA
B./C. On-the-Job-Training
The college and the partner training institutions should have a good working
relationship to assure success of the training program.
Facilities and equipment should be shared between the school and industry.
There is a need for an office to coordinate this activity and help graduates identify
possible employment opportunities in coordination with LGU agencies.
There is a need for continuous search for industry partner for on-the-job training
of the students and future placement of graduates.
G. Entrepreneurship
Page | 102
RATING SYSTEM
RATING SYSTEM
The rating system is based on a numerical evaluation of 0-5 points with 5 points
as the highest rating, 1 is the lowest rating and 0 if there is no provision/ none existence
of the specified item/s in the institution/ program being evaluated.
Apart from numerical evaluation there are also descriptive evaluation that
indicates the provision, conditions or characteristics found in good colleges/programs.
Not all of them, however, may be specifically necessary, or even applicable in every
college. While a college may lack some of the items listed, it may have other
compensating features. The descriptive evaluation is intended to provide the factual
bases for a fair evaluation of the different aspects of the school’s instructional program.
This survey instrument makes use of a Likert scale for facility of understanding and
administration.
The computation of ratings in every area are as follows; the accreditor will give a
rating ranging from 0-5 in every item/ criteria/standard. The ratings at each
item/criteria/standards under Input, Process and Outcome are totaled. The sum is
divided by the number of items summed up in order to get the Inputs Mean, Process
Mean and Outcome Mean. The Inputs Mean is multiplied by 20%, the Process Mean is
multiplied by 30% and the Outcomes Mean is multiplied by 50%. The sum total of all the
product of the Inputs Mean, Process Mean and Outcomes Mean is the final rating in a
sub-area. The total of all the Sub-area ratings divided by the number of Sub-areas is the
Area Final Rating.
Page | 103
I. COMMENTS
A. BEST PRACTICES
In the space provided, list briefly the technique, method, or process being
practiced by the institution/college in a particular program/area, that through experience
or research has been proven the most efficient and effective way to accomplish desired
result that is often used for benchmarking.
________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
In the space provided, list briefly any remark concerning matters not sufficiently
treated which needs to be taken into consideration for the improvement in the overall
performance of the institution/ program.
________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
II. RECOMMENDATIONS
________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Page | 104
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND EMPLOYABILITY
IPO IPO
SUB-AREA RATING MEAN
INPUTS:
1. The institution has partners with business and industry in
Curriculum Development.
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. The University/College Council examines the curricula,
prior to approval.
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOMES:
1. Market-driven curricula as shown in the following
a. industry/employer feedback as evidenced by the
following documents:
i) Tracer questionnaire;
Page | 101
iii) Employability checklist suggested by industry;
b) Advertising
c) survey
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Page | 102
IPO IPO
SUB-AREA RATING MEAN
B. INVOLVEMENT OF PRACTITIONERS IN THE
TEACHING PROCESS
INPUTS
There is a system for involving industry practitioners
through Memorandum of Agreement/ Memorandum of
Understanding.
1
2. The institution has a competitive salary rate for industry
practitioner
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. The institution engages practitioners, who possess
combination of educational qualifications and extensive
industry related experiences, to teach
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOMES:
1. Qualified practitioners as faculty members
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
IPO IPO
SUB-AREA RATING MEAN
C. ON-THE-JOB TRAINING
INPUTS
1. There are professionals handling students under
practicum/ OJT.
Page | 103
3. There is collaboration of training offices and professional
staff.
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. The institution reviews, monitors and evaluates training
program for students: practicum/OJT
Page | 104
4. There is execution of MOA/MOU between the institution
and Industry partners.
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOMES:
1. Adequate and effective training program
3. Job-ready students
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
IPO IPO
SUB-AREA RATING MEAN
INPUTS
1. There is an office for networking and partnership.
Page | 105
5. The resources are owned by LCU/ Industry partner
b. Speakership
c. Technical Assistance
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. The institution established a system of resource sharing.
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOMES:
1. Strong and sustainable partnership
2. Sharing of expertise
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Page | 106
IPO IPO
SUB-AREA RATING MEAN
INPUTS
1. There are tracer studies per program.
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. The institution reviews, monitors, implements and
evaluates policies on partnership for On-the-Job Training
(OJT).
2. The institution established relationship with Industry
Partners.
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOME:
1. High placement opportunities
2. Fulfillment of social responsibility for nation-building
3. Corporate social responsibility achieved and realized.
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Page | 107
IPO IPO
SUB-AREA RATING MEAN
INPUTS
1. There is communication between the institution and
different Industry Partners for On-the-Job Training of the
students.
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. The Institution implements a record management system
that ensures data integrity/data privacy, and which can be
referenced either manually and/or with the aid of
automation.
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOME:
1. Organized usage and archival of raw data and
computerized data that support critical operation of the
institution
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
G. ENTREPRENEURSHIP
INPUTS
1. The institution offers six (6) units of entrepreneurship
course.
INPUTS MEAN
(20%)
PROCESSES:
1. Integrates of entrepreneurship courses in the program
across discipline.
PROCESSES MEAN
(30%)
OUTCOME:
1. Enterprising-minded students.
2. Student Entrepreneurs
OUTCOMES MEAN
(50%)
BEST PRACTICE/S:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Page | 109
Documents, Additional Information and Exhibits
1. Board Resolutions
2. Minutes of Meetings
3. Program of Studies
4. Faculty Profile (matrix type)
5. Industry Profile
6. HRMO Manual
7. Faculty Manual
8. OJT Manual
9. Portfolio
10. Personal Data Sheet of the faculty and personnel
11. Copy of Memorandum OJT Schedule
12. On-the-Job Training (OJT) forms
13. Memorandum of Agreement/Memorandum of Understanding (MOA/MOU) with
industry partners
14. Memorandum of Agreement/Memorandum of Understanding (MOA/MOU) with
local government
15. Regular Consultations/ emails
16. Meetings and Reports
17. Waiver Letter of Endorsement
18. Insurance
19. Orientation
20. Regular Consultation
21. OJT Manual Undertaking
22. On-the-job Training (OJT) program, OJT Curriculum/ Syllabi
23. Orientation Program
24. Attendance
25. Seminars
26. Workshops
27. Field Trips
28. List of facilities with pictures and activities
29. Programs and Site Visitations
30. Photos / Videos
31. Request letters
32. Emails
33. List of facilities with photos
34. Sharing of expertise
35. Updated Tracer Studies
36. Newsletter
37. Alumni Homecoming Activities
38. Alumni Profile / Updated Directory
39. Registration Form
Page | 110
40. List of Alumni Officers and Members
41. Documents from the Office of Student Affairs (OSA)
42. Career placement programs
43. Counseling and guidance
44. Letter of invitation from industry like Placement Employment and Service Office
(PESO)
45. Communication letters
46. Certificate of Appearance
47. Signed Agreement
48. Course Program
49. Course Syllabi
50. Project Proposals
51. Programs
52. Financial Statements
53. Project Launching
54. Designation approved by the BOR/BOT
55. Memorandum of Agreement / Memorandum of Understanding (MOA/MOU) with
industry
56. Outcomes-based defined standards
57. Minutes of meetings
58. Circular Memorandum Order (CMO)
59. Outcomes-based Education (OBE) curriculum
60. Updated Tracer Studies
61. Project Proposals, photos, programs of entrepreneurial activities or project
launching
Page | 111
Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.
Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.
Jederzeit kündbar.