Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.visionias.in
(b) The mind of the superior man is conversant with righteousness; the mind of the mean man is
conversant with gain. Confucius.
Approach:
Briefly, elaborate the quote.
Provide arguments /examples to highlight the present-day relevance of the quote.
Conclude the answer.
1 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Answer:
‘What is the right thing to do?’ may be different for different people. In the given quote, Confucius is
trying to argue that superior amongst people are those who are concerned with what is right, and not
merely what is right for them alone. As an example, a person who takes a long term view or whose
thoughts, speech and action are aligned with the collective good of society, would be a superior man as
compared to a person who remains selfish, greedy and follows self-centred tendencies and unethical
means, who would be a mean man.
Generally, it is easier and more profitable to pursue greedy self-interest when a person has to choose
between it and the collective societal good. Preferring immediate gratification and short-term gains over
long-term collective gains to the society is often clearly visible, and hence becomes the chosen course.
Such “mean man” tendencies are often seen in daily acts like tax evasion, littering public places, paying
no regard to traffic rules, un-mindful use of water/electricity, displaying no compassion towards animals
or making electoral choices purely out of religion/caste considerations etc. Worst form of “mean
tendency” is seen when people indulge in abhorrent acts like human trafficking, drug abuse, terrorism
and adulteration which have long term negative consequences for the society. On the other hand, a
superior man, with simple acts such as saving and segregating waste to be disposed-off properly
undertakes more effort with lesser immediate benefits to himself.
It also raises the important issue of the limited understanding of what is the right thing to do. Broadly,
the scope of righteousness constitutes: (i) Correct personal conduct, (ii) Not indulging in personal
aggrandizement, (iii) Doesn’t cause harm or violate other citizens rights or cause social trouble. The goals
that we desire and the principles that we use in their pursuit are the primary parameters to judge what
is righteous or not. People like Swami Vivekananda, Mahatma Gandhi and Dr Abdul Kalam rose above
self-interest and devoted one’s life and energy towards humanity are role models for modern society.
However, it is imperative that everyone cannot be a mass leader and sacrifice most self-interest for
others. Still, everyone can be a leader in one’s own right and have a longer vision for oneself and the
society. This way, everyone can aspire to not be a mean man and progress towards being a superior
man. Even by doing simple tasks such as following the taxation laws in letter and spirit makes one a
superior man. In this case, the task of deciding what is the righteous thing has been left to the State-
which decides the laws; the task of man is not to be the mean man by selfishly seeking short-term gains.
2. (a) Impersonal management, a characteristic feature of Weberian bureaucracy, develops over time
into indifference, especially with regard to weaker sections of the society. Critically discuss.
Approach:
Briefly introduce impersonal management and write about its importance in Weberian bureaucracy.
Give some suggestions to make Weberian bureaucracy sensitive towards weaker section.
Answer:
Impersonal management is the management through system of official authority and pre-defined rules
rather than personal involvement, emotions and sentiments. It forms the core of Weberian bureaucracy
which seeks to maximize efficiency.
Necessity of impersonal management
Ensures equality in treatment of people, without any favor or hatred.
Ensures fairness and objectivity in bureaucratic functioning.
Creates institutional memory/precedents to shape future decision making.
Decisions by rational rather than personal factors within the framework of law.
Problems of Impersonality principle
Some thinkers argue that Weberian bureaucracy suffers from an inevitable failure in the complex
environment like developing countries because of the blind and rigid adherence to rules which leads to
(b) In pursuit of political power, means are often compromised that leads to competitive reliance on
unethical practices resulting in erosion of public trust. Discuss.
Approach:
Briefly discuss the issue of compromise of means in pursuit of political power.
Highlight the probable implications of the use of unethical means on public trust.
Conclude answer by suggesting the ways to restore people’s trust.
Answer:
In ethical discourse, “means” are as important as “ends”. Political parties with various ideologies seek (or
at least, profess) to implement their vision for country’s welfare, and getting in power electorally is an
important means to do that. Pursuit of political power, thus becomes the race most heavily contested in
a democracy. As such, winning at all costs is generally the strategy of all parties.
The professed ends in this race may be good, i.e. the purpose for which power is sought, but the means
used to achieve are often unethical, unfair and deceiving. Usually the parties either try to lure voters by
means of promises (emotional or financial) or they try to force voters by means of intimidation or
coercion.
Both measures rely on weakness of the electorate as well the state. Political parties make competitively
false promises to attract voters based on the assumption that most do not have the capability,
wherewithal or time to analyse the promises in detail. Those who are able to do so and see the falsities
may get disenchanted immediately. Those who vote for the too-good-to-be-true promises get
disenchanted later. In both cases, it is the public trust in the electoral system that gets eroded.
Similarly, coercion of voters through use of money and muscle power erodes people’s confidence and
willingness to participate in the process. Adoption of unethical means such as acceptance of donations
3. (a) It takes more than a corporate governance policy to inspire ethical behavior and sustain a truly
ethical workplace. Discuss.
Approach:
Briefly, describe corporate governance policy.
Provide arguments to bring out the inadequacy of merely the corporate governance policy to
promote ethical behavior and suggest how to inspire and sustain ethical workplace.
Conclude the answer.
Answer:
Corporate governance is the set of mechanisms, rules and practices by which a corporate entity is run.
These usually consist of set standards defining code of conduct of the employees, the management and
the organization- the ways in which they are expected to act. Important pillars of corporate governance
are transparency, accountability, fairness and protection of stakeholders’ interest. It is expected that it
will ensure the adherence to the legal and ethical practices by all through a compliance policy and
statement of values. A corporate governance policy highlights the commitment towards the relevant
laws, rules and regulations and constitutes a statement of values, informing the stakeholders about the
company’s priorities and core belief, thus setting behavioral expectations.
Despite good intentions and sound ethical frameworks under corporate governance policy, the
organizations and its employees often do not behave in the manner that the policy advocates. The test
of CG Policy is not merely whether a company explicitly has it or not. It must be effective and seen to be
working. If employees and the company are not ethical in their day to day behaviour, it denotes a failure
of the policy. At the same time, in critical matters where the company/shareholders indulge in unethical
practices such as insider trading, secretive corruption, etc., then it reflects that those responsible for
enforcement of policy themselves do not believe and follow it. This resort to unethical practices can be
due to the following reasons:
Inability and psychological fear among employees to raise ethical concerns.
Excessive pressure to achieve unrealistic performance targets.
The setting of conflicting goals by the organization provokes a sense of injustice and unfairness.
Lack of conscious efforts on the part of leaders to set a positive example. For e.g. allegations of
misallocation of resources by CEO of a reputed bank sets a bad precedent.
These instances show that the mere creation of an ethical framework is not enough. It must be backed
up by practices such as appointment of auditors who actually maintain an arms-length relationship with
(b) "Law should be so succinct that it can be carried in the pocket of the coat and it should be so
simple that it can be understood by a peasant." Discuss.
Approach:
Introduce by stating the relevance of this quote.
Discuss the meaning of the statement – emphasising key words.
Conclude with examples.
Answer:
The given statement was quoted by Napoleon, which also finds its mention in the 2nd ARC report on
ethics in governance. The statement focuses on why law should be brief and concise so that one can
comprehend it easily. Also, law should be away from complexities, so that even the person existing at
the lowest rung of the pyramid (in this case, peasant) can decipher it.
The above statement gains relevance in the context of:
The lengthy legal texts and intricate language used in framing the constitution, and a no. of civil &
criminal laws, etc.
Expensive legal system for the poor and marginalised and termed as lawyer’s paradise.
Complex jurisprudential interpretation of law and policy.
The complexities in the law often end in secrecy as well as harassment of the ordinary people.
Existence of obsolete and archaic laws.
In the present context, to make laws succinct and simple a substantive exercise must be carried out of
identifying those statutes and regulations that no longer serve a useful purpose, but may become a tool
for delay, obstructionism and harassment. There should be systematic use of drafting techniques like
sunset and review clauses, and simplification of the procedure for repeal.
As a civil servant and a law-abiding citizen of the country, it is the duty of every citizen to aid and assist
the poor by not only promoting the cause of simple procedures and legislations, but by also making
available free legal aid for socially and economically vulnerable people as envisaged under Article 39A
and the Legal Services Authorities Act.
Several such initiatives have been undertaken to simplify legislative procedures. For instance:
The government undertook repeal of about 2000 archaic laws in the past decade such as through
Repealing and Amending Act, 2017.
Civil society organisations taking law to tribals and poor by making them understand and
representing their causes. For example, civil societies working for the rights of Adivasis in
Chattisgarh.Single window clearance mechanisms have expedited last mile service delivery and
minimised hassles of complex procedures.
Apart from reforming the laws, The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) has been constituted
under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to provide free Legal Services to the weaker sections of
4. (a) Ethics in international relations has the potential to cater to the diplomatic challenges of 21st
century. Examine.
Approach
Bring out how ethics plays a significant role in diplomacy
List out pointwise how ethics play an important role in meeting the various challenges of
international diplomatic field
Give examples from context of Indian foreign policy and international relations.
Answer:
The states act in their own perceived national interest. As rational actors, they are always faced with
choices and it is up to them which principles and values they want to uphold in pursuing one amongst
them. Ethics in International Relations deals with fairness and equitability of the international systems
today and in future.
Ethics have gained special significance given the nature of problems facing the world today like climate
change, inequality, globalisation and resistance faced by it, governance of the commons, migration and
refugees, nuclear stockpiling, terrorism and involvement of state and non-state actors in it etc.
Ethics can meet the challenges of diplomacy in 21st century in the following ways:
Moral Diplomacy: In the present-day context, moral diplomacy in international relations has a role
for everyone including the state officials and citizens who care about human rights, human dignity,
liberty, and justice and is therefore of crucial importance to a civil servant’s conduct, especially in
foreign policy which deals with multilateral and bilateral contexts. Example: Gujral Doctrine towards
India’s smaller neighbour is based on it, Panchsheel principle with China is also a result of moral
diplomacy.
Soft Power: It is persuasive approach to international relations majorly using economic and cultural
influences. Such influences are not possible until and unless the international actors atleast appears
to be ethical in their stands. Examples:
o There are many protests against Chinese investments in countries by the masses because their
investment and project practices appear unethical and exploitative
o Assistance to Nepal during the earthquake in 2015
o Blue economy investments in Seychelles, Madagascar, other island countries.
Public or Citizen’s diplomacy: Track II, III and other track diplomacies need ethical and moral
engagement. People to people contact is not possible without it. E.g. Initiatives like Aman ki Asha,
Nimrana dialogue etc.
In governance of global commons: International community has to share the global commons, and
protect and preserve the same. It cannot be done through brute force alone. E.g. Intended
determined national targets can neither be fulfilled, nor the climate change governance successfully
implemented until international players show any ethical conducts.
International Cooperation on social malaises like Terrorism, colonialism, dealing with cross border
epidemics like Ebola, disasters like earthquakes etc which create destruction beyond borders need
ethical commitment of nation states.
Though realists claim that the international politics is only limited to ‘big fish eat small fish’ logic, yet
successful diplomacy is very strongly dependent on the ethical commitment of the international actors,
systems and masses.
6 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
(b) Nolan Committee provides for one of the most comprehensive statements of what constitutes
ethical standards for holders of public office. Elaborate.
Approach:
Introduce by highlighting the need for ethical principles in public life and the ground on which these can
be adjudged as most comprehensive.
State set of values proposed by Nolan Committee and their role in creating a robust ethical framework.
In conclusion, suggest a few measures to implement them.
Answer:
While what has to be done is mostly clear and defined under law, rules and procedures, how it has to be
done is usually a matter of choice for the person responsible. A civil servant has to take decisions based
on facts, but which facts does she choose and which he ignores, or how much time she spends in
gathering them is the actual measure of whether the person has done her duty completely and ethically.
Public Servants have to exercise a certain level of discretion to reach a decision as laws, rules and
regulation cannot define every aspect of their work. Ethical norms become crucial to guide public
servants in fulfilling their duty in such cases. Committee on Standards in Public Life in the United
Kingdom (Nolan Committee) set forth seven ethical principles which are most comprehensive as the
applicability of the same are relevant in all democracies and most dilemmas in public life.
Selflessness - Selfness seeks to imbibe the idea that public servants will always uphold the public
interest vis-a-vis self-interest. This principle helps sailing through the conflict of interest.
Integrity - Integrity of public official demands to remain undeterred from outside influence in her
words and actions. It is crucial to execute her duties faithfully.
Objectivity - An objective civil servant takes action as per the fact of the matter at hand. It helps
create faith in public and advance towards efficiency.
Accountability - Accountability makes public servants accountable for their action towards people
and laws. It brings about the good governance.
Openness/Transparency - This principle caters to provide information to public unless withholding
information is absolutely necessary.
Honesty - An honest officer declares all the materials facts of conflict of matter and willfully try to
resolve such conflicts.
Leadership - Leadership demands public servants to lead organization and people with example and
great vision.
These standards steer public officials to not only resolve difficult situation but also helps to make
positive impact on the society. These standards should be implemented through Code of Ethics, Code of
Conduct, and Training.
5. (a) The sharper the socio-economic disparities, the greater the incentive towards corruption. Analyse.
Approach:
Briefly mention status of socio-economic disparity and corruption in India.
Discuss the causality between increasing socio-economic inequality and corruption.
Highlight its impact on the society.
Answer:
There seems to be a direct relation between incentive to corruption and inequality. Transparency
International ranks India 78 out of 180 countries in its corruption index of 2018. Incidentally, other low
ranking countries in this index also perform poorly on income inequality.
Socio-economic disparities and Corruption
Corruption is directly proportional to the socio-economic gap in a nation. Cultural and historical
factors also influence this, but greater the socio-economic disparities, greater is the incentive
towards corruption.
(b) The moral worth of an action depends not on the consequences that flow from it, but on its
motivation. Explain the statement with the help of suitable examples. 10
Approach:
Briefly highlight the meaning of moral worth in the introduction.
Explain the relationship between the intention and consequences of an action and its moral worth.
Give appropriate examples to support your arguments.
Conclude on the basis of the above points.
Answer:
An action is morally worthy when it is performed for the right moral reasons.
The moral worth of an action should not be identified only with its value in producing good or bad
consequences. What matters is the motive, and the motive must be right. Right thing should be done,
not because of some ulterior motive, but for right intentions. Consequences of an action occur after the
action, they provide a justification after the decision has been taken and cannot be changed. Before
that, they are merely speculations, even if rationally expected. They can justify whether the act was right
or wrong, but they cannot be used to judge its moral worth.
For any action to be morally worthy, it is not enough that it should conform to the moral law but it must
also be done for the sake of the moral law. As per Kant, the motive that confers moral worth on an
action is the motive of duty which means doing the right thing for the right reason. If we act out of some
motive other than duty, such as self-interest, then our action lacks moral worth. For example: A prudent
shopkeeper doesn’t overcharge an inexperienced customer only to protect his reputation and business
because word might spread about his dishonesty. Since the shopkeeper acted honestly only for the sake
of self-interest, the shopkeeper’s action lacks moral worth.
Kant suggests that a moral motive is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a moral action. For him,
doing good deeds out of compassion, “however right and however amiable it may be,” still lacks moral
worth. On the other hand, a miserable person so filled with despair that he has no desire to go on living.
If such a person summons the will to preserve his life, not from inclination but from duty, then his action
has moral worth.
So, we can assess the moral worth of an action by the motive from which it’s done and not the
consequences it produces.
8. Explain what you understand by the following values and discuss their importance for civil services:
(a) Professionalism
(b) Nishkama Karma or Selfless Action
Approach:
Briefly define professionalism.
Discuss its importance for civil services
Explain Nishkama Karma
Discuss its importance in civil services
10 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Answer:
a) Professionalism
Professionalism means competence or skills expected of persons to carry out desired work in an
effective manner. Professionalism is a component of work ethic. It is representation of one’s
character.
A strong work ethic suggests person’s commitment on doing good job with integrity, while
respecting colleagues and subordinates.
Professionalism in Public service encompasses values such as time and task management,
objectivity, diligence, neutrality, loyalty, transparency, punctuality, effectiveness, impartiality etc.
Importance of professionalism in civil services:
It includes timeliness and punctuality which is key to meet deadlines for an over-worked
bureaucracy.
Professionalism also means taking responsibility while being accountable for the action.
It will ensure conceptualization of cost effective, innovative and properly targeted schemes with
effective implementation.
Also the schemes will be monitored and evaluated in unbiased manner. It will prevent corruption.
Professionalism lays stress on rationality and emotional detachment. Civil Servants remain neutral,
in case there is change in political guard.
Professionalism helps in setting good examples and brings credibility to the institution.
Even Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1964 recommends civil Servants should perform and discharge their
duties with the highest degree of professionalism and dedication to the best of their abilities.
b) NISHKAMA KARMA/ Selfless Action
Nishkama Karma or the philosophy of disinterested performance of duties without any
expectations in return is one of the major teachings of Bhagvad Gita.
It teaches that the duties are to be performed without any selfish motive, desire or anxiety for
results of the actions. Such duties lead to a balanced and more duty bound society.
Nishkama karma as a quality is an asset in civil services as:
A certain set of duties have to be performed absolutely selflessly and without any expectations.
There should not be any conditions to service (such as those based on caste, race, religion, sex, etc.)
in their minds other than sincerity for these duties.
The result of action should not agitate their minds even in tense situations. This can be possible only
if one is involved in one’s duty with detachment and is focussed only on personal accountability,
honesty and integrity.
Selfish action may lead to unethical practices such as corruption, nepotism, misconduct,
inefficiencies, misuse of power, etc.
It is also helpful in resolving the tension between altruism and self-interest and paves the way for a
more holistic and ethical governance where welfare and consumerism is balanced.
Many a times a lot of situations are not in an individual’s hands. One can only put in efforts from
their end without any guarantees of the result, in such situations a civil servant remains motivated
and focussed.
As it teaches desireless action, Nishkama Karma liberates one from being over ambitious or over
attached to any worldly things. It keeps the mind and soul in balance.
9. There have been widespread protests both in favour of and against advancing reservation in
educational institutions and government jobs to a certain section of the society. You are the chairman
of a high level commission that was constituted to look into the matter. The commission has found no
compelling reasons to provide reservation to this section and is about to submit its final report to the
government.
Meanwhile, the government takes the decision to extend reservation to the section, turning the
commission's findings inconsequential. You have also been requested to ensure that the final report
supports the government’s decision.
10. You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following:
(a) If one wants to remain effective and powerful to create impact on the lives of people, one should
remain loyal to those in power.
(b) Following ethical means may not be practical and effective at all times.
(c) Petty corruption expedites the service delivery.
Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits.
Approach and Answers:
(a) If one wants to remain effective and powerful to create impact on the lives of people, one should
remain loyal to those in power.
Approach:
Briefly discuss the possible circumstances for such an observation.
Write down the merit and demerit of the proposition.
Based on arguments provided, evaluate the given statement.
Answer:
While people join the civil services for a variety of motives, the government recruits them with the
objective of serving the needs of the people. In order to carry out the duties, the civil servants have to
work with different stakeholders- their seniors, colleagues in other departments, ministers, political
representatives (which may be opposition as well) and common citizens. To be effective, it is important
to be cordial and work in a manner that synergizes all efforts. Support of their superiors and those in
power is necessary for that.
However, being cordial does not mean being loyal to those in power. A civil servant has to be neutral
and impartial. The facts collected, their analyses, advice given on their basis and decisions ultimately
taken cannot be colored based on loyalty to those in power rather they have to be based on objectivity.
It is often the case that those who do not toe the line of people in power are shunted out. For the civil
servant personally, it may hamper transfer postings/professional growth and may create disharmonious
working environment. It is because of these reasons that many people believe that remaining loyal to
those in power is necessary.
Demerits:
People in power may serve their own vested interest instead of public interest.
(b) Following ethical means may not be practical and effective all the times.
Approach:
Analyse the merits and demerits of following the ethical means
Answer:
Generally, people believe that following ethical principles at all the times is ineffective and impractical
due to various reasons like:
Ethical ways of doing things may add costs in terms of delays and price.
Everyone has their own priorities i.e., what is good for one may not be beneficial for others.
One may not have complete information about the situation, so it is difficult to act ethically all the
time.
For example, one may argue that unethical (and illegal) means like secret phone tapping may be
required. Going through the entire process of permissions may be time consuming, may not yield in
desired results and hence such means are better than inaction.
However, following ethical practices at all times is necessary because of following merits -
It helps in taking principled and right decision
An individual’s capacity to analyse information is limited, and hence systemic morality in form of laws
and rules must be followed at all times even when they may seem as obstruction.
Ethical decisions have more acceptability and sustenance than unethical ones.
Ethical decisions are truthful, conscience based and hence they have more clarity than unethical
ones. To cover a lie, a person may have to tell many more.
The person taking decision also lives in harmony with oneself and prevents undue stress.
Creates right precedence and working environment and thus leads to inclusive and sustainable
growth
It brings respect and love from peers and citizens.
Development without ethics will benefit only few, raise inequality and will be unsustainable.
11. Recently, two national level sportspersons who are integral members of their team, made some
comments in a talk show which were perceived as being grossly misogynistic and racist. This created a
huge controversy and they were temporarily suspended from the team pending an enquiry. In light of
these events, answer the following questions:
(a) Do you think public figures have an additional responsibility in so far as expressing their views on
matters of public importance is concerned? Give reasons.
(b) According to you, what are the reasons that some prominent public figures make such misogynistic
comments, and even get away without any consequences?
(c) As the person in charge to enquire into the conduct, what factors would you consider to examine it
and what punishment, if any, would you prescribe in this specific case?
Answer:
Sportspersons, usually, are icons in a country because they represent the country and compete at the
highest level. They carry an additional responsibility in their conduct off the sports field as they are the
ambassadors of the sport and the country as well as because they have a huge influence on the people.
In the given case, it has been seen that these national level players made inappropriate remarks and
thus have been suspended, pending an enquiry.
Stakeholders in the given case:
The sportspersons themselves, who have risked their careers and fame because of their actions.
Their Families, who suffer mental trauma and defamation
Society, especially women, who were objectified
The fans of the sport
The management/administration of the sports involved.
a) Reasons Why public figures must act responsibly in matters of public importance:
Public figures such as celebrities, sportspersons, politicians etc. tend to hold a major sway and
influence over the masses. This is sort of a great power they enjoy and with great power comes
great responsibility.
They are role models of many especially children. So, their actions may determine the future of
those following him/her and in turn decides the future of the nation.
They represent the nation while playing for the national team. So, they should exercise caution and
restraint while making such comments.
b) Reasons of some public figures making misogynistic comments:
Socialisation process during upbringing i.e. effect of family, teachers and society on an individual.
Such thoughts are imbibed in their psyche.
Lack of sensitivity, which may be a result of fame and success coming easy without much of a
struggle.
Lack of value-based education in schools.
15 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Lack of empathy and respect towards women.
Playing in all-men teams from a young age leave these sportspersons deprived of a co-educational
environment thus leaving them with lack of gender sensitivity.
Effect of popular culture such as movies especially on young athletes.
Despite making such misogynistic comments, the public figures usually get away with it because:
Use of power and influence to get away from possible trouble and backlash. For example, use of
Public Relations teams to diffuse such issues as soon as possible and keeping them out of media.
Such behaviour thrives on tolerance of the society and the general forgiveness for lack of
understanding.
Lack of strong legal mechanisms to punish such men for making misogynistic comments.
Patriarchal society seldom reacts negatively to such comments in the requisite manner as they are
often termed as casual remarks not amounting to any harm.
c) Factors to be considered while examining such a conduct:
Legality- Whether the conduct is liable to be punished under a specific law or code of conduct?
Responsibility: As an ambassador of sports and the nation, what minimum standards of conduct are
expected and what conduct is totally unacceptable.
Effect on team: Necessity to send a message to other sportspersons about their conduct and
responsibility.
Social factor- To maintain society’s trust in the administration of the sport, they must be informed about
the seriousness and sensitivity with which the board treats this matter.
Personal factor- The importance as well as the age, past conduct, discipline record etc. of the
sportspersons involved.
Viewpoints of the captain, coach and other key stakeholders of the team.
A sportsperson, however good he/she is, cannot be bigger than the team, the sport, the society. His/her
criticality to the team cannot be an excuse for reckless behavior. In my view, such a poor conduct is
liable to be punished after considering the above factors. Letting them go off with just a warning would
set a wrong precedent. Even if no legal barrier is there about the manner of conduct and things spoken
in public, responsibility at such a level of influence cannot be neglected. It would also indicate to other
sportspersons that they can go scot free too after such a conduct.
The purpose of the punishment is to warn and reform them and not to destroy their careers. In this case
also, the punishment should not be as severe as that for say cheating (like ball tampering) but sufficient
to ensure that they learn a lesson and avoid such a conduct in the future.
Also, young athletes need to be given gender sensitisation training to deal with such issues better and
develop empathy towards women.
12. There are large number of leather industries in a major industrial town of India. They provide
employment to large number of people and are also a prominent source of revenue for the state.
Lately, it has been observed that despite following the present emission control rules, the collective
ecological footprint of these industries remains quite high affecting the surrounding areas in an
adverse manner. The new technologies available for emission control are quite costly and thus act as a
disincentive for the owners of the industries for adopting them.
In light of this information, the government is contemplating the following options:
(a) Shutting down the industries in the region
(b) Relocating the industries to a new region
(c) Making the emission control rules stricter
(d) Providing incentives to the industry owners for adoption of new technology.
Analyse the above options in terms of their merits and demerits. What course of action would you
choose and why?
16 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Approach
Identify ethical issues involved in the case.
Evaluate the given options.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each option and indicate which action would take
providing justification for the same.
Answer
Ethical issues involved in the case are:
Rights of Citizens to have pollution free environment.
Ecological damage due to pollution leading to biodiversity loss and other ill-effects
Principle of “polluter pays”
Human rights of farmers
Rights of industries to conduct their business
Analysis of the options given:
a) Shutting down the industries in the region
This action will immediately remove a major source of pollution for the city. It will have wider impact on
a large area and biodiversity at large.
But, this is an extreme step and violates rights of many stakeholders- industrialists, employees and will
also be detrimental for the economy. It also violates rule of law as the industries are compliant with the
existing norms and does not give them opportunity to present their case.
b) Relocating the industries to a new region
This action seems to put some costs on the industries in favour of larger public interest of citizens. There
has to be a cost benefit comparison between shifting industries to a newer region and installing emission
control technology at the present location first.
Also, this action is just changing the place of pollution from the present town to some other place. This
does nothing to mitigate the pollution risks posed by the industry. The new place’s environment will be
at risk now.
c) Making the emission control rules stricter
This will ensure that industrial wastes are treated before their disposal. Also, violators will be identified
and penalized. Moreover, it will ensure that rights of industry and common citizens are both protected.
This can provide relief in very short duration.
However, putting in place a robust mechanism has several challenges like the government lacks the
capability to monitor and enforce polluting industries. It will also require coordination between different
government organizations which has several loopholes. Moreover, this will lead to higher cost for
industries to follow regulatory practices in the short term. However, a sustainable action requires that
long term interests of citizens and environment be protected and the industries asked to adapt
according to them.
d) Providing incentives to the industry owners for adoption of new technology
This will help in mitigating the pollution in the region; while at the same time would also protect the
interests of the industry and the common people. But it would entail financial costs on the government.
As the area officer, it appears that the last option i.e. option (d) appears to be the best because it is the
mix of short term and long term options. On the one hand, it will ensure that all regulatory guidelines
are strictly adhered to and on the other it will help all the stakeholders to find a long lasting solution. An
added benefit would be that industries will be more compliant and willingly so.
13. Many coal mines in a district subject the workers to inhuman working conditions with little safety
measures in place. As such, there have been several accidents and many workers have died in the
past. In recognition of a recent accident where fifteen workers were trapped and died, the National
Green Tribunal has ordered for closure of all such mines. Some of them have shut down, but many still
continue to operate by getting an exception from the government, sometimes using the unholy nexus
of politicians-miners-bureaucrats. In absence of alternative employment, the locals have no other
choice but to work in mines. The mine owners are in-fact inciting the workers to protest to
Conflict of Interests
Here the major dilemma is to strike a balance between ensuring development and environmental
protection.
Secondly, closing mines will result in loss of job for miners. Recently Supreme Court in Cracker Ban
case observed that the judiciary should not kill jobs, if it can’t provide alternative employment.
Thirdly, the law makers and the enforcers i.e. politicians and bureaucrats are in connivance with law
breakers, is an obvious case of conflict of interest.
14. Recently you were posted as a District Magistrate of a predominantly agricultural district, which has
been one of the best performers in agriculture since the last decade. In one of your field visits, you
find that the large landowners, who are a socially, politically and economically powerful group,
employ domestic helps and agriculture labour who are informally tied to them and have been working
there since generations. In return, these workers are provided basic amenities like food and shelter
apart from some money. However, you do sense a violation of basic human rights in this situation.
In light of the above case, answer the following questions:
(a) Identify the stakeholders, their interests and ethical issues involved in the case.
(b) How does denial of choice amount to violation of human rights?
(c) What course of action would you take? Give reasons.
Approach:
Briefly highlight the key stakeholders, their interests and ethical issues associated with the case
study.
Discuss how denial of choice violates basic human rights.
List the ethical dilemma and course of action.
Answer:
The given case illustrates the system of informal employment in violation of the basic human right of
choice and the fundamental right to livelihood.
a) Major stakeholders, their interests and ethical issues:
People employed as domestic help & agricultural labourers: The absence of a contract makes them
vulnerable to exploitative working conditions, insecure tenure and low wage rates. Apart from
bordering on illegality, it shows lack of empathy, and compassion among the landowners.