Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

*05010901* 0501/0901

Fifth Semester Three Years LL.B./Ninth Semester Five Years B.A.LL.B./


B.B.A.LL.B. Examination, June/July 2015
CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND LIMITATION ACT

Duration : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100

Instructions : 1. Answer Q. No. 9 and any 5 of the remaining questions.


2. Q. No. 9 carries 20 marks and the remaining question
carries 16 marks each.
3. Answers should be written either in English or Kannada
completely.

ÓÜãaÜ®æ : 1. ±ÜÅÍæ° 9 ®Üá° EñܤÄÔ. ÖÝWÜã EÚ¨Ü ¿ÞÊÜâ¨Ý¨ÜÃÜã I¨Üá ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÚWæ


EñܤÄÔ.
2. ±ÜÅÍæ° 9 PæR 20 AíPÜWÜÙÜá ÖÝWÜã EÚ¨Ü ±ÜÅ£ ±ÜÅÍæ°Wæ 16 AíPÜWÜÙÜá.
3. EñܤÃÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÓÜí±Üä|ìÊÝX CíXÉàЅ®ÜÈÉ A¥ÜÊÝ PܮܰvܨÜÈÉ
ŸÃæ¿á¸æàPÜá.

Q. No. 1. Explain the doctrine of Res-judicata. State its objects and


principles. Marks : 16
±ÜäÊÜì ®Ý¿á ԨݜíñÜÊÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ. C¨ÜÃÜ E¨æªàÍÜ ÊÜáñÜᤠñÜñܤ$ÌWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔ.

Q. No. 2. "Every suit shall include the whole claim in respect of the cause
of action". Comment with illustration. Marks : 16
""±ÜÅ£Áãí¨Üá ¨ÝÊæ¿áá ÊÝÂg PÝÃÜ|¨Ü ÓÜÊÜìÓÜÌ ¸æàwPæ¿á®Üá°
Öæãí©ÃܸæàPÜá''. ¨ÜêÐÝríñÜWÜÙæãí©Wæ aÜbìÔ.

Q. No. 3. Define foreign judgement. When shall it be conclusive and state


the presumption relating to foreign judgement. Marks : 16
˨æàÎ £à±Üì®Üá° ±ÜÄ»ÝÑÔ, C¨Üá ¿ÞÊÝWÜ ¯OÝì¿áPÜ ÃÜã±Ü ñÝÙÜáñܤ¨æ
ÊÜáñÜᤠ˨æàÎ £à±ÜâìWÜÚWæ ÓÜíŸí—Ô¨Üíñæ ±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æWÜÙÜá ¿ÞÊÜâÊÜâ ?

P.T.O.
0501/0901 -2- *05010901*
Q. No. 4. What is attachment ? Explain the properties which are not
liable for attachment and sale in execution of a decree. Marks : 16
g²¤ Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? wQÅ hÝÄ¿áÈÉ g²¤ ÖÝWÜã ÊÜÞÃÝo ÊÜÞvÜÇÝWܨÜ
ÓÜÌñÜá¤WÜÙÜá ¿ÞÊÜâÊÜâ ? ËÊÜÄÔ.

Q. No. 5. What is interpleader suit ? State the conditions that must be


satisfied for filing interpleader suit and who cannot file this
interpleader suit ? Marks : 16
AíñÜÊÝì¨Ü ¨ÝÊæ Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AíñÜÊÝì¨Ü ¨ÝÊæ ÖÝPÜÆá ¸æàPݨÜ
ÐÜÃÜñÜá¤WÜÙÝÊÜâ¨æí¨Üá £ÚÔ ÖÝWÜã ¿ÞÃÜá D AíñÜÊÝì¨Ü ¨ÝÊæ¿á®Üá°
ÖÝPÜÇÝWÜáÊÜâ©ÆÉ .

Q. No. 6. Explain the term reference. State the circumstances on which


reference can be made and how does it differ from Review. Marks : 16
EÇæÉàS H®æíŸáÊÜâ¨Ü®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔ. ¿ÞÊÜ ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜÈÉ EÇæÉàSÊÜ®Üá°
ÊÜÞvܟÖÜá¨Üá ÖÝWÜã EÇæÉàSÊÜâ ±ÜÃÝÊÜáÍæìÀáí¨Ü ÖæàWæ ¼®Ü°ÊÝX¨æ.

Q. No. 7. "Once the time has began to run, no subsequent disability or


inability can stop it". Discuss. Marks : 16
""JÊæá¾ PÝÆËᣠ±ÝÅÃÜí»ÜÊݨÜÃæ ñܨܮÜíñÜÃÜ EípÝWÜáÊÜ ¯ÁãàWÜÂñæ¿ÞWÜÈ
A¥ÜÊÝ AÓÜÊÜá¥Üìñæ¿ÞWÜÈ A¨Ü®Üá° ¯ÈÉÓÜÇÝWÜáÊÜâ©ÆÉ ''. aÜbìÔ.

Q. No. 8. Write short notes on any two of the following : Marks : 2×8=16
PæÙÜX®Ü ¿ÞÊÜâ¨Ý¨ÜÃÜã GÃÜvÜPæR ÆZá q±Ü³~ ŸÃæÀáÄ :
a) Garnishee order
WݯìÎ B¨æàÍÜ (ÓÝÆWÝÃÜ®Ü ÓÝÈWÜ )
b) Summons
ÓÜÊÜᮅÕ
c) Inherent powers of court.
AíñÜÅ&¯ËìñÜ A—PÝÃÜ.
*05010901* -3- 0501/0901

Q. No. 9. Solve any two of the following problems : Marks : 2×10=20


¿ÞÊÜâ¨Ý¨ÜÃÜã GÃÜvÜÃÜ ÓÜÊÜáÓæ¿á®Üá° ŸWæÖÜÄÔ :
a) A suit was institutes by the plaintiff firm alleging infrigement by the
defendant company for using the trade name on their product with
the same combination as that of plaintiff firm. A subsequent suit was
institutes in a different court by the defendent company stating the
same allegation. Advice the plaintiff firm with the step to be taken in
accordance with law.
ÊÝ©¿áá Jí¨Üá ±ÝÆá¨ÝÄPæ ÓÜíÓ槿ÞX¨Ü᪠, ±ÜÅ£ÊÝ©¿á PÜí±Ü¯¿á ËÃÜá¨Üœ
ÊݱÝÃÜ¨Ü ÖæÓÜÃÜá ÊÜáñÜᤠJí¨æà Ÿ|¡¨Ü ÓÜí¿ááPܤWÜÙÜ®Üá° AÊÜÃÜ ÊÜÓÜá¤WÜÚWæ
ŸÙÜÔPæãívÜ PÝÃÜ| B PÜí±Ü¯¿á ¨ÝÊæ¿á®Üá° ÖÜãvÜáñݤ®æ. ±ÜÅ£ÊÝ© PÜí±Ü¯¿áá
ÊÜáñæã¤í¨Üá ¨ÝÊæ¿á®Üá° ¸æàÃæãí¨Üá ®Ý¿ÞÆ¿á¨ÜÈÉ C¨æà ËaÝÃÜÊÝX
¨ÝÊæ¿á®Üá° ÖÜãvÜáñݤÃæ. PÝ®Üã¯®Ü A®ÜÌ¿á ÊÝ©¿áá ¿ÞÊÜ PÜÅÊÜáWÜÙÜ®Üá°
PæçWæãÙÜÛ¸æàPæí¨Üá ÓÜÆÖæ ¯àw.
b) Rama filed a suit against Krishna for declaration of ownership on the
property stating that he has purchases under a registered sale deed.
Subsequently he seeks to ammend the plaint claiming that the property
was granted to him by the government. Can he succeed ? Discuss.
ÃÝÊÜá GíŸáÊÜ®Üá PÜêÐÜ¡®Ü ËÃÜá¨Üœ ÓÜÌ£¤®Ü ÊÜÞÈàPÜ®æí¨Üá NãàÑÓÜÆá ¨ÝÊæ
ÖÜãvÜáñݤ®æ. D ¨ÝÊæ¿áÈÉ ÃÝÊÜáá ñÝ®Üá D ÓÜÌñܤ®Üá° ®æãàí¨Ü~ PÜÅ¿á±ÜñÜŨÜ
ÊÜááTÝíñÜÃÜ PæãíwÃÜáÊÜâ¨ÝX £ÚÓÜáñݤ®æ. A®ÜíñÜÃÜ ¨ÝÊæ¿á ÓÜÌñܤ®Üá° ÊÝ©Wæ
ÓÜPÝìÃÜ©í¨Ü ÊÜáígãÃÜá BXñÜᤠGí¨Üá £¨Ü᪱Üw ÊÜÞvÜÆá CbfÓÜáñݤ®æ. CÊÜ®Üá
g¿áÍÝÈ¿ÞWÜáÊÜ®æà ? aÜbìÔ.
c) Mr. Santosh seeks condonation of delay for not preferring an appeal
within the period of limitation because of engrossing in his marriage.
Is it condonable ?
ÓÜíñæãàÐÜ®áÜ ñÝ®Üá ñÜ®°Ü ÊÜá¨ÜáÊæ¿áÈÉ Èà®ÜÊÝXÃÜáÊÜâ¨ÜPÝRX PÝÆËᣠAÊܗ¿áÈÉ
Êæáàƾ®ÜË¿á®Üá° ÖÜãvÜÆá ËÙÜíŸ¨Ü PÜÒÊæáWÝX PæãàÄPæãÙÜáÛñݤ®æ. C¨Üá
PÜÒÊÜÞÖÜìÊæà ?
________________

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen