Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Critical Reading

 To find ways of thinking about the particular topic


 To make judgment about how a work is argued/developed
 To assess the strength of the evidence and the argument

A. ANALYSIS
1. What is the theory?
2. What are the supporting points that create the argument? How do they relate to each
other? How do they relate to the thesis?
3. What are the examples used as evidence for the supporting points? How do they relate
to the points they support? To each other? To the thesis?
4. What techniques of persuasion are used?
5. What modes of analysis are used (illustration, comparison/contrast, cause and effect,
process analysis, classification/division, definition)?
B. INTERPRETATION
1. What debates were the author and the text engaging with at that time?
2. What kinds of reasoning (historical, psychological, political, philosophical, scientific,
etc) are employed?
3. What methodology is employed and what theory is developed?
4. How might my reading of the text be biased?
C. EVALUATION
1. How does it contribute to the discipline? Are its main conclusions original?
2. Does the evidence and reasoning adequately support the theory/theories presented?
3. Are the sources reliable?
4. Is the argument logically consistent? Convincing?
5. Are any experiments, questionnaires, statistical sections, etc designed and executed in
accordance with the accepted standards of the relevant discipline?
6. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?
Literature Review
1. Experimental Research on Water Curtain Scavenging Ammonia Dispersion in Confined
Space by Min Hua et al
A. READING
Topic Mitigation technique
Latar Belakang  Rapid development of chemical Industries including ammonia
 A few tons of liquid ammonia are present in the slaughtering
houses
Masalah Ammonia is toxic for humans and may cause environmental damage
when leaking
Maksud Mengurangi keparahan peristiwa pelolosan NH3 di dalam ruangan
tertutup dan mengetahui efektivitas water curtain
Tujuan Melakukan eksperimen efektivitas penggunaan water curtain dalam
berbagai kondisi (arah penyemprotan, tekanan air dan jenis nozzle) dan
berbagai jenis sensor
Rancangan Riset Pemodelan, simulatif
Metode Water curtain
Hasil

B. CRITICAL READING
ANALYSIS

What is the theory?

What are the supporting points that create


the argument? How do they relate to each
other? How do they relate to the thesis?

What are the examples used as evidence for


the supporting points? How do they relate
to the points they support? To each other?
To the thesis?

What techniques of persuasion are used?


What modes of analysis are used
(illustration, comparison/contrast, cause
and effect, process analysis,
classification/division, definition)?

INTERPRETATION

What debates were the author and the text


engaging with at that time?

What kinds of reasoning (historical,


psychological, political, philosophical,
scientific, etc) are employed?

What methodology is employed and what


theory is developed?

How might my reading of the text be


biased?

EVALUATION

How does it contribute to the discipline?


Are its main conclusions original?

Does the evidence and reasoning


adequately support the theory/theories
presented?

Are the sources reliable?

Is the argument logically consistent?


Convincing?
Are any experiments, questionnaires,
statistical sections, etc designed and
executed in accordance with the accepted
standards of the relevant discipline?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of


the theory?

2. Design of mitigation systems for indoor and outdoor amonia releases by Mastellone
at al
C. READING
Topic
Latar Belakang
Masalah
Maksud
Tujuan
Rancangan Riset
Metode
Hasil

D. CRITICAL READING
ANALYSIS

What is the theory?

What are the supporting points that create


the argument? How do they relate to each
other? How do they relate to the thesis?

What are the examples used as evidence for


the supporting points? How do they relate
to the points they support? To each other?
To the thesis?
What techniques of persuasion are used?

What modes of analysis are used


(illustration, comparison/contrast, cause
and effect, process analysis,
classification/division, definition)?

INTERPRETATION

What debates were the author and the text


engaging with at that time?

What kinds of reasoning (historical,


psychological, political, philosophical,
scientific, etc) are employed?

What methodology is employed and what


theory is developed?

How might my reading of the text be


biased?

EVALUATION

How does it contribute to the discipline?


Are its main conclusions original?

Does the evidence and reasoning


adequately support the theory/theories
presented?

Are the sources reliable?


Is the argument logically consistent?
Convincing?

Are any experiments, questionnaires,


statistical sections, etc designed and
executed in accordance with the accepted
standards of the relevant discipline?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of


the theory?

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen