Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
http://4hrm.info/performance-management-handbook/
1. Career Development
• This provides an opportunity for discussion of career objectives, and creation of a strategy designed to maximize
career potential.
• To provide an opportunity for career counseling
• To help in succession planning.
• To assess training needs
• To plan for career development
• To assess and develop individual abilities
• To provide an objective basis on which to base decisions about training and promotion
2. Feedback
• As well, feedback is encouraged in both directions: as such, employees are encouraged to prepare ratings of their
supervisors.
• To provide constructive feedback to the individual regarding how their performance is seen.
• This provides a structured format for the discussion of performance issues
• on a regular basis.
• Feedback either reinforces performance strengths, or provides the opportunity to discuss resolution of performance
deficiencies.
• Salary
• Promotion
• Retention/termination
• Recognition of performance
• Layoffs
• Identification of poor performers
4. Performance History
• This provides a performance history which is not dependent upon human memory, and which may be useful in the
full range of personnel decisions, including compensation decision-making.
• To review past and present performance, identifying strengths and weaknesses.
5. Organizational Goals
6. Job Standards
This provides an opportunity for clearer articulation and definition of performance expectations.
Related documents
Generally, the staff will improve their way of work before performance appraisal and this will be recorded in the
appraisal. However, business should pay attention to that in the annual appraisal and appraise the whole process.
The staff’s working behavior will returned to their original status after performance appraisal is completed.
Remember that concession in performance appraisal results in many troublesome problems. The concession will
offer the employees a highly appreciated result for mediocre work and they will be rewarded. However, the same
results will continue in their work because they are not assessed at their true worth, not recommended improvement.
3. Overlooking mistake
Overlooking mistake will also make mental troubles. The good staffs have less motivation to work because there no
difference between their rewards and that of bad staffs. Lack of strictness leads to concession. Once a high standard
is sustained, the appraisal accurately reflects the work of staff. The over-rigorous assessment reduces the
employee’s working motivation and makes them disappointed. They think that whatever they do, they also have not
got fit reward.
The consolidation of employee’s attitude focuses on the impact of working behavior. The manager plays a key role in
strengthening the staff’s current attitude and proving new working behavior.
• Recruitment and selection: Score tabulation allows forecasting employee’s work accomplishment possibility and
measuring the effectiveness of tests.
• Development of human resources: Show the demand for training, education and development; identify employee’s
imperfections to be corrected.
• Career plan and development: Identify employee’s potential imperfections; help them to carry out the plan.
• Inferior personnel tie: Promotion, reduction in grade, contract termination, work suspension, transfer.
• Employee potential appraisal: Based on employees’ work accomplishment, examine past activities to forecast future
performance. Common mistake is made when one of high professional capacity is promoted lacking leading capacity.
The evaluated object needs to be specified so that an objective appraisal is guaranteed.
2. Policies of performance appraisal
Specify in handbook or publicize at meetings. Managers must bring these in their minds.
• Maintaining leading quality improvement, bonus increase for those of good performance.
This definition is used for both: performance appraisal and performance evaluation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_evaluation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_appraisal
The method of evaluating an employee’s performance which involves tracking, evaluating and giving feedback on
actual performance based on key behaviors/competencies established in the goals that support the achievement of
the overall organizational mission.
In that sense Appraisal tend to be understood as more “objective” and the Evaluation” appears to be more
“subjective”. But this need not necessarily be so and how it will be depends upon the individual who appraises or
evaluates, his training, his competence on the job and his own personality strengths and weaknesses.
2. Clear understanding of what is expected and what needs to be done to meet expectations.
3. Opportunity to discuss aspirations and any guidance, support or training needed to fulfill these aspirations.
5. Opportunity to overcome the weaknesses by way of counseling and guidance from the superior.
4. Opportunity to link team and individual objectives with department & organizational objectives.
5. Opportunity to clarify expectations that the manager has from teams and individuals.
7. Means of forming a more productive relationship with staff based on mutual trust and understanding.
• Managers are better equipped to use their leadership skills and to develop their staff.
• The leniency bias crops when some raters have a tendency to be liberal in their rating by assigning higher rates
consistently.
• Equally damaging one is assigning consistently low rates.
• Some raters appraise all the employees around the middle point of the rating scale and they avoid rating the people
higher or lower level.
• They follow play safe policy because of answer ability to management or lack of knowledge about the job and
person he is rating or least interest in his job.
If the rater dislikes any employee, he may rate them at the lower end and this may distort the rating purpose and
affect the career of these employees.
• To minimizing the halo effect, you should appraise all the employees by one trait before going to rate on the basis of
another trait.
• A person outstanding in one area tends to receive outstanding or better than average ratings in other areas as well,
even when such a rating is undeserved
In general, raters remember the recent appraisal of the employee and they usually follow appraisal results last time.
Many employees are not even aware that a good or bad appraisal can impact their career prospects.
The highly complex questions which they have no answers to or highly complex competencies which they have never
heard of confuse them.
Many employees have poor language skills and they are unable to communicate their performance in right language
and support with data.
1. HR manager should clearly define the purpose of appraisals to employees and to managers.
2. Train employees on writing appraisals: Another key to make employee appraisals effective is to provide training to
employees on appraisal writing skills.
3. Provide effective feedback: After an appraisal is done, let employees have a copy of the appraisal, then you let
them know how it impacted their salary, compensation and career.