Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MENT OF 0MEKM
AD-AO32 350
Wc76
3307
IMSMACIMRPOR S-7&1t
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF
SUNDISTURBED SAMPLING OF COHESIONLESS
MATERIAL BELOW THE WATER TABLEf
by
U. S. Staffrd S. Cocpef
Cr j176
Cktcu
IID. VA.
Wn~ntwt 214
uakr C S 3114
Unclassified
SECURITY CLASSIrICA ION 0. THIS PAGE '1.. 0.e. FO'.7-di
Stafford S. Cooper
Unclassified
I OCLASSIFICATION
7.r DOWNGRADING
$.CmfOuLt
1 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
x
Unclassified
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF T"iIS PAGE("On 0.f. Pn.ved)
I
I
.o', Unclassified
- s.'.'d['-:"
PREFACE
authorized by OCE under rhe CWIS 31145 work unit entitled "Liquefa tion
Potential of Dams and Foundations."
Chief, EE&VD, and Mr. J. P. Sale, C:i.ef, Soils and avements Laboratory
(S&PL). This report was prepared by Mr. S. S. Cooper ant internally
reviewed by Mr. S. J. Johnson, Special Assistant, S&PL. OCE technical
monitor for this investigation was Mr. Ralph R. W. Beene.
During the time this study was conducted RG Ernest D. Peixotto,
CE, and COL G. H. Hilt, CE, were Directors of WES. The Technical
Director was Mr. F. R. Brown.
.4
CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE ............ .............................. .. I
CONVERSION FACTORS, U. S. CUSTOMARY TO hETIIC (SI)
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ........ ............. 3
PART I: INTRODUCTION .......... ....................... 4
PART II. TEST FACILITY....... ..... ................ 6
General ............. .......................... 6
Stacked Ring Soil Container n,
d Foundation .... ......... 6
Ov.-rburden Loader ........ ...................... . i.11
(nmpling Equipment ........ ..................... . 15
PART lIT: TEST PROGRAM ....... ..................... . 20
TABLE I
PLATES 1-- 7
APPENDIX A: PEIROGRAPHIC ENIN, f!ON OF REID-BEDFORD ,UDEL SAUND
i2
j
CONVERSION 'croRs, U. S. CUSTOMARY TO METRIC (SI)
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT
Multiply Bv To Obtaii
I
I
43
13
I
LABOIATORY INVESTIVATION OF UNDISTURBED
PART I: INTRODULrION
nuclear p.,wer pl~ats and large dams. 3ecause of the critical n- ..urt of
this probl(m, the Corps of Engineers felt that the work they had done in
this area sooe years ago should be extendeci. 1,2 Earlier work conducted
at. the Waterw.r&s Experiment Stal-ion (WES) involved development of a
means to take inlisturbed sand samples using a fixed-piston saimpler and
1
driliing mud. Reference 2 describes the results of fixed-pis:on samp-
ling in a large tank ;n which sana was placed at variable densities.
The dersity of the sand wirhin the sampiing tubes was compared with the
plaeetnent densities :" he sand in th_ tank.
2. Indirect mer, )d-; of determining the in situ density La.. been
used widely i:. the fiej. Work has ieen done ii thi area using -ndi-
rect methods such as the Standard Penetration "e,;t (St'T) o- the Dutch
3- 7
Cone. Thee indirect methods are based on - crelations of penetra-
tiu;. resista-ce, oi'erbu!-den pressi e. and .elative dens'ty. They are
- wide.v used because they are hoth expedient and econorical means Lo
evaluate in situ density. Many enginee s from th.' start have que.tioned
Cnese corrclotions; however, they are s, ill widely uised. WES is now
evaluating the SfPT procedure in a stac--ed ring facility. The results
of these tests will be discussed in a .Av;sequLnt report.
3. In conjuaction with the Standard P,:netration Tests, WES has
taken undisturbed fixed-piston samples in the s:tked ring facility.
These samples were taken to the laboratory and iabor.to;rv density
4
j determina-ions made. These sampled denskties ware then compared with
the as-built density of the specimens. This report will Jiscuss these
results.
,W
PART II: TEST FACILITY
General
Stresses fromt aoplied loads can likewise be reduced by more Jhan one-
11
half at a depth of one diameter. Hence, the impetus to minimi .e wall
friction effects by means of a vertically flexible coreainer.
6. The WES stacked ring container consists of a srack of i-in.-
high by 4-ft-ID steel rings which are separated with 3/16-in.-thick
6
REACTION BEAMS
6-IN..ID PROTECTIVE
SLEEVE FOR CENTER
a n
HOLE IN LOADING HEAD
HYDRAULIC RAMS
CONCRETE PEDESTAL 2
STACKED RINC
SPECIMEN CONTAINER CABLE WAY
STAIRWAY
II SPECIMEN BOTTOM
II . -EFR
II
G-', Z-W.PACTE2
II _ D- BEDF'R-D SA% C
S'rANDARD CONCRETE
SAND BLANETT
% S T, VATER A-5
7<
-42
8<
Iin the steel rings to accept mating keys molded in the rubber spacers.
9
" RUBBER SPACER
SPECIMEN A
A - LK-STEEL RING
A 3 16'
SA
A
AI
stemmed with highly compacted sand and the upper 1-./2-ft of the hole
was used to install a graded filter so that the Zesc specimens could be
submerged from the bottom up. The filter was constructed in three
3-in.-thick layers, grad,1.g from a base layer of l-in.-diam crushed
rock to a tup layer of "pea" sized rock. A 1/2-in.-diam perforated
garden hose was coiled in the base layer of the filter and e::tended to
the floor level via a cableway provided in the foundation. Thc top
filter layer was covered with a single thickness of cotton fabric, and
the remainder of the 6-1/2-ft-deep specimen hoe was stemmed with com-
pacted sand to the bottom of the specimen preparation pit. The test
specimens were constructed over the filter and occupied the 6-fL-deep
space between floor level and the bottom of the specimen preparation
10
I I
Overburden Loader
11
--- '------#---
-
- - - - -
I
so that the cylinder end of each tam is founded on two beams. The rams
in the water bag and penetrate approximately 2 in. into the specimen
beneath. They se-ve to guide the samplers and to pro .ect the water bag
during sampling and reaming. The fiberglass-reinforced rubber water
12
'A,-A
la-
Figue
cnsol6.Contol
13I
A
I TOP VIEW
6-ilN. -C10I.
ITL
SECTION A -A SCALE
0 6 1e 24 IN
top steel ring of the stacked ring container. The "0" ring seal in the
flange of the loading head prevents metal to metal contact with the
15
tackle for the drill rods was secured to rafters in the ceiling. For
& sampling ard drilling, the rig was elevated on a platform built level
j with the top of the loader-support pedestals. A port ble mud pump sup-
plied with mud from a sump atop the loading head provided mud circula-
I tion during reaming. The mud sump was formed biy encircling the upper
part of the loading head with a thin metal band. as shown in Figure 9.
i .. Undisturbed samples were taken w. n a Hvorslev 3-in.-ID
thin-wall, fixed-piston sampl. r. Nomin,:l diienFions for the 16-gage
sample tube include a 2.97-in..-ID cutting edge, a taper angle of 10
degrees on the cutting edge, and an area ratio of 11 percent. 13 The
cotm" !te sa.mpler it,shown in Figure 10, and a schematic of the sampler
is shown in Figure 11. The drill rod used in sampling vas 2-in.-OD "N'
size. The WES-modified fishtail bit shown in Figre 12 was used for
reaming. The bit itself is commercially available. However, special
baffles were added at WES to direct the flow if drilling mud upward,
away from the bottom of the borehole. Thus, disturbance of the under-
lying material by circulating mud is minimized when reaming or drilling
to sampling depth.
- t
I
-
: 16
I'
- - ~
I -~ -
II
j
II II
I
I #-~---
=
II
*
i
Figure 9. Mud suxnp atop loadftzg head
I I
I
I I
S..4
SAMIRL
A
5- IN. ADAPTER
Nz.Ca A-.
drawing~3 1253r
so. rvsd9 cs3
o18f .
Figure 12. WES-rnodified fishtail bit
19
PART III: TEST PROGRAM
General
Material Properties
subangular particles.
i 20
I
JLW As U*5Uvo~ IND~ su
fq~u . Irv.~4
= a
-~C -- L 4L~
z U _
- ~4-
InI
01~
0 -- * -i--0-0t--Om
V 4-1 t% c
LU13 A$i IND4-
VIM1
-~ 7 /
4 -S4
Specimen No. 5.
19. Specimen construction was begun by first filling the rainer
Test Procedures
23
of weighiug the material placed in each lift aud then computing an over-
all density after the final lift was placed. To evaluate placement uni-
formity, incremental density measurements were takeit in the remaining
specimens using a WES-developee )ox density device. The box density £
24
59
-80
U701-
u60
a. S0O
z
0 40
0: 30
o 20
310
a.
TIME
LEGEND
I --
TEST SEQUENCE
SAMPLING INTERVAL
26
undisturbed samples were sealed with end packers and stored overnight in
a vertical position. The following day, the tubes were placed in a
horizontal position in a special wooden carrying rack. The top of each
tube was marked so that this orientation could be maintained throughout
the density determinations. Each tube was then tapped 50 times with a
rubber hammer on the top surface to consolidate the sand (25 blows in
one direction, repeated in the opposite direction along the t':be). The
tubes were later cut into 6-in. segments for density determinations.
Density determinations were also made on shorter sections if enough addi-
tional material remained after the tube was cut into 6-in. segments.
Test Results
27
techniques were being developed and the problem of vertical density
variations had yet to be addressed. These data, comprising 22 of the
65 density variations plotted, have been included oaly for gross com-
parisons since the implicit assumption of an average (uniform) vertical
density i,; known to be incorrect. Negative values on the plots indicate
that the sampled density determination showed a lower density than the
placed density; positive val!es indicate the reverse. Various factors
which affect the comparison of placed and sampled densities obtained in
the study will b,2 examined in the analysis section of this report.
30. Also shown in the plates, where applicable, are plots of
force on the sampler versus depth of penetration. These data were
computed from drill-rig, hydraulic pressure measurements recorded for
to the sampler, the rig hydraulic pressure was multiplied by the total
working area of the two hydraulic rams pushing the sampler. When push-
ing the sampler in dense material, the rig pressure frequently exceeded
the range of the bourdon gage used to make the pressure measurements.
The maximum force of 6300 lb shown in plots may thus be substantially
less than the actual force applied to the sampler. Sampler force is
plotted as a dashed line to indicate some uncertainty in accuracy.
28
I
PART IV: ANALYSIS
better than the accuracy with which specimen conditions can be deter-
mined at the time of sampling. Given the nature of soil materials and
that test results will be accurate only to within certain limits. Ac-
cordingly, it is necessary to evaluate by the most practical means any
32. The first variable, i.e., tie relative accuracy of the box
lateral variation in dersity from the center (where the sample was
29
taken) to the radius of the peripheral hole- (between which the box
density measurements were made). It is prohable, then, that the placed
densities reported did not accurately reflect densities where the sam-
ples were taken, and that the variation was typically on the order of
±2 pcf.
34. A direct measurement of specimen deforniition would have pro-
vided a convenient way to assess the third variable, placed density
increase due to overburden pressure. This change in density is not
otherwise accounted 'ot because placed density was measured before over-
burden pressure was alied and the samples were taken later. Urfor-
tunately, measurementF f specimen deformation under load were not con-
ducted during this study because the physical arrangement of the test
apparatus is ill suited to the purpose. Also, the absence of a rigid
boundary at either end of the specimen may adversely affect the accuracy
with which such measurements could be made. Nevertheless, it is recog-
-nized that density changes occur as a result of loading, and that
sampled densities should properly be compared with placed densities
corrected to reflect the change. In order to indirectly assess the sig-
nificance of density changes under load, one-dimensional consolidometer
tests were conducted on saturated samples of Reid-Bedford sand. Results
from these tests are shown in Figures 17, 18, and 19 and these results
were used to derive the correction curves shown in Figure 20 which re-
late placed density and density increases to overburden pressure ap-
plied. The density corrections derived, the variations between placed
density (corrected and uncorrected) and sampled density for each test,
and other pertinent data are summarized and tabulated in Table 1. The
density corrections for overburden pressure applied ranged from 0.19 to
1.82 pcf, and averaged about 0.7 pcf. The correction values postulated
should be reasonably accurate, considering the method of derivation and
its applicability to test conditions.
35. To summarize, the three variables and their probable in-
fluence on the accuracy of placed density determinations are as
follows:
30
414
00
0 ) .z
U)'
0 0
I-
o-cc.Q
.=2f
r~ a,
0 . .
or Z 3t
- II
0 Lw
10 0
IV~
0 0 0
4-
~ -4 tr
O-j 0
A'.)C
c' -
AJ -4
j-
10' 0.
i-
3
-Sd d te'SS3eSd NO *i"N
I
I
Probable Range of Vriation i
Variable pcf
Box density measurement error ±0.2
Specimen nonuniformity ±2.0
Density change due to overburden pressure +0.7 pcf (average) I
I
The cumulative upperbound error from all three variables would thus be
+2.9 pcf and the corresponding lowerbound error would be -1.5 pcf. The
positive (+) bias is assumed to represent overburden pressure effects. I|
Comparison of Placed and Sampled Density Results|
'0
z6
= 2
PC F
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
106 I I I
90
104
0
80
0
102 -
100 0
I-.d
D 98 - Y r 0.803X + 19.475 00
I 0 z
01 7s~oo
0
0 ILI
96- 00
1 0
-440"
0 0
000 0
94
0 7o
04
40 0
92 2
90 -c
90 92 94 96 98 l1 102
"
u .PLACED DRY DENSITY PCr
ad
35
tests 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 were used in Fi.gure 22 lb.
cause the placed
ml density in tests 2 and 4 was determined from bulk rather than incremen-
tal box density measurements and did not provide the desired direct
comparison. For reasons given previously, the data points at -6 and
-10 pcf were not plotted in Figure 22. A linear regression analysis was
performed on the data shown in Figure 22 and the linear fit derived is
indicated by a dashed line in the plot. The equation of the line is:
y = O.8 0 3x + 19.475
* where
y = sampled density
x = placed density
The coefficient of corteiarion for the linear fit to the data is
r = 0.83 and the coefficient of determination is (r ) 0.69.
xy xy
For a high lcvel of confidence in fit, it ie generally accepted that the
36
=1
Ao . .. , - ' -. - ... ... . . - v - -
density measurement errors and the lateral density variations, are ran-
dom in nature. Since these variations are random it is di'ficult to
evaluate their effect on test results excep, in general terms. The
third variable, density increases due tD overburden pressure, is sys-
tematic and its effect on the comparison of placed and sampled densities
can be assessed with reasonable accuracy from the data tabulated in
Table 1. To this end, the corrected, olaced density data from Table 1
4were used to construct Figures 23 and 24, which were plotted in the same
way as Figures 21 and 22. Comparing Figures 21 and 23, it can be seen
that the primary effect of the overburden corrections is to shift the
mean deviation line in Figure 23 towards the vertical (zero) axis while
the standard deviation remains relatively unchanged. This is consistent
with the previous assunpticn of systematic variation. Comparing
Figures 22 and 24, it can be seen that the linear regression fit to the
data in Figure 24 is a line which is closer to the line of perfect samp-
ling. Both regression fits exhibit a similar trend in slope; however,
the linear fit in Figu.e 24 crosses the perfect sampling line at a
reltive density oi -bout 36 percent. Thct is a pronounced scatter of
data points in both plots, particularly for those points falling in the
placed relative density range between 50 and 60 percent. The coeffi--
cients of correlation and determination for Figurp 24 are 0.82 and 0.67,
respectively, and these are nearly identical w-. i similar values from
the regression fit presented in Figure 22.
39. Since these data and earlier work 2 exhibit a generally
similar trend, Figures 25-31 were prepared for further comparisons. In
Figures 25-31, the dersity variation of sample increments from placed
density at the same depth is plotted versus increment location in the
sample tube. The abcissa of each plot is dry density; the ordinate is
scaled as distance from the bottom of the sampling tube to the center
of eaca density increment. The figures include information on sample
depth within each specimen, sample identification number, and the over-
burden pressure at which the sample was taken. The uppi, plot in
Figurc:, 25-31 shows sampled density variations from as-placed density;
the lower plot shows variations from placed density which has been
37
____
___ ___
____ _______ _____ _ ___ ___ ____ ___ __7
141
01, -8ARITHMETIC MEAN 0.15 PCF
12-
L NOTE OEVIA-IONS OF -10.7
AND -7.2 PCF DISREGARDED
I FOR THESE CALCULATIONS.
IllI STANDAFD DEVIAT!ON 1.67 PCF
10
w
U
U8
U- 7
0
U
wz6
3 7
0
-12 -10 -9 -8 -7 -3 -2 -1 0 I 2 3 4 5 6
PC F
38
RELATIVE DE''STY DR PERCENT
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
10 6 ..........
104
0
-80
02 0
70
0 z
0100 w
0 U
0"Id
0
> 0 80 (t
z
0 -
LINEAR REGRESSION FiT 0 w
TO CORRECTED TEST % a
OCATA 0 50 w
L1 J J Y 0 90SX Q I--
Srx, - 0082
00 00 0r
- 40
0 0
0 0
92 20
90 II I I
90 92 94 go 98 1OO 102
39
SAMPLE VW.RIATION FROM PLACED DENSITY
36 7v I
Z30
0I
(n I DA
0Z 12
-j A
it 0
0
0- -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3I 4
I
Is .t J - -------- -
,.,i Io
0 0_I
SI
0
(024i
0z I iJ
-5 -4 -3 -2 - 0 2 3 4
DRAY DENSITY ' 7
l r
LEGEND
l '=,40<i
SAMPLE DEPTH IN OVERBURDEN
,
SYMBOL NO SPECIMEN, IN PRESSURE, PSI
0 1 0-27 10
a 2 30-48 40
a 3 48-65 80
30
24
__ ___ _ 1
__ - __
0 Z -. z ~l
w -
00
Z0
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 I 2 3 4 5
II I
(U3
zI ,
10 2 4
0 -I
0 0 02
DRYDENI '7Do PF
5 -4 -3 -2 -I 0 2 3 4
DRY DENSITY 4d, pe n
LEGEND
SAMPLE DEPTH IN OVERBURDEN
SYMBOL NO SPECIMEN$ IN PRESSURE, PSI
0 1 0-23 10
0 2 23-41 40
a4 42-65 60
0 1
I-I
8-
o-
zw- 6 --
(n a:
I Aj
U 0_0
0- 5 -4 -3 -2 -I 0 I 2 3 4
0.
SAMPLE VARIATION FROM PLACED DENSITY
0- (CORRECTED FOR OVERBURDEN PRESSURE)
36
IL I
0
0
w- 30 .. ;- . - ---
. ..
z UJ 00!
fA 0 0
AG 0
0 I ,
6 0
0 It
-5 -4 -3 -2 -I 0 I 2 3 5
ORY DENSITY '7 d PCF
LEGEND
SAMPL E DEPTH IN OVERBURDEN
SYMBOL NO SPECIMENI IN PRESSURE, PSI
0 I 0-24 10
0 2 24-48 40
A 3 48-72 80
I' 30
bI I I ,
-10.24
I A
20
wI
-
0Z 52 -4 - -2 0- -1 . 2. 3 4-
.. . 5
04,, _ _ _
0 __
zw I
-
a 0
W)
0 24 I
-10.7 -
____,__
0-
G__
I
IT
I1
--- 1--
0
--
I
I
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
DRY DENSITY PCF
• :. t Q
- i f 4t
LEGEND
SAMPLE DEPTH #4 OVERBURDEN
SYMBOL NO SPECIMEN IN. PRESSURE, PSI
0 1 0-21 10
a 4 44-6C 80
24
-.. 1
52
,6 •0 • -
t.Zl
2w -4 -3 -2 - 1 0 2 3 45
-5
wo _O
_
60 - " -3 -- -2.
* . -..... . . 0.I - 0 3
l'- SAMPLE VARIATION FROM PLACED DENSITY
11- (CORRECTED FOR OVERBURDEN PRESSURE)
0-
7 k: -7.2 Z
-5 -4 - 3= -2 - 0 -3 ... 2-
t0
0 II
0 -- -0 4
6 6 30-4 4
-3
S4 -2.1 0 1 2 804
t m s e 7 I
5 0
SYMBOL froPspec
NOb MEN, IN= 5PvRERts
44<
--------
SAMPLE VARIATION FROM PLACED DENSITY
I°I,i
II I W
Z
--
a
-4-- I
A
i
I- A
"Z 0
0- -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
,.,
30 -- ---1
0 1 __ _ _ _
S -4 -3 -2 - 0 2 3
DRY DENSITY -fd PcFr
.45
LEGEND
SAMPLE DEPTt, IN OVERBURDEN
SYMBOL NO SPECIMr N IN. 'RESSURE PSI
O 2 21-39 40
a 3 47-67 80
0-2 -i 0 2 3
' 4
w3--
LZ S1 2-
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 2 3 4 5
7
DRY DEN SIT Y d C
LEGEND
SAMPLE OPTH IN OVERBURDEN
SYMBOL NO SPECIMENU IN. PRESSURE, PSI
0 1 0-18 10
46<
corrected to account for the overburden pressure applied. While Figures
25-31 exhibit considerable scatter, the general trend of the data ob-
tained at relative densities ranging from 20 to 60 percent indicates
that sampled density decreases with it,,,easing distance from the bottom
of thf sample tube. This trend is similar to results obtained in the
earlier work on a similar sand placed at Dr = 90 percent; however, in
the earlier study results at D z 20 percent showed a reverse condi-
r
2
tion. Also, density corrections based on locaLion in the sampler tube
derived in the previous study are not consistet.L with results of this
investioation at intermediate relative densities, i.e., Dr from 30 to
60 percent. The same sampling procedures were used in both studies, so
the difference in results may be attributed to test conditions (solid
wall versus sracked ring containers) or to the effect of the variables
cited earlier.
40. The preceding analysis illustrates the difficulty experienced
in separating test variables from an assessment of sampling accuracy.
In this instance, the corrections for density changes due to overburden
pressure are apparently very significant to the test results. The ran-
dom variables associated with placed density determinations are much
less susceptible to evaluation and cause some degree of uncertainty in
an assessment of sampling accuracy. However, an assessment can be made
from Figures 21 and 23; by definition, 95 percent of the sampling data
must fall within the range of -2 pcf. Within this range, sampling ac-
curacy is indicated to be ±3.4 pcf for density samples taken at relativ
densities Dr ranging from 20 to 60 percent. The linear -egression
data fits presented in Fig,'res 22 and 24 indicate that snmpling slightly
densifies the sand at low relative dgnsities (Dr < 40 per-cent) and
tends to loosen denser (0 > 50 percent) sand.
r
24
PART V: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions
varied from +2.9 to -1.5 pcf from measured values due to the combined
effects of the test variables.
42. The sampled versus placed density comparisons presented sug-
gest that sampling accuracy using the techniques described is within
during the study; it is very probable that in this event the apparent
accuracy of sampling vw.uId have shown a corresponding improvement.
43. Despite the uncertainties cited, results of this and earlier
york exhibit generally similar trends. For instance, this and the
selected test data also lead to the conclsion that overburden pressure
Recommendations
48
less).
so that density variations across the specimen can be re-
duced to the practical minimum (preferably ±0.5 pcf or
b. A system to measure vertical deforma:tion of the specimen
should be added to the test apparatus.
III
i 49
REFERENCES
50
4I
I,
91
Aspl PLAC9 Dlati..a
Colacede d pf paa Pacd
pgh
' Dry' D~t IF"= S.L. Dry1 0im 4ty OUT oaImu y~ FUSS9Ijcd Pl~Domos
Pwreu v* pcipe .
80. d
6,~r acb.4 rc1..
fp
2 46 5.40.595.9 1-1 -0.44
12 (i"059.1 1-2 96. 2.? 2.2
-0.4
I.i !- - II
14 Salk .595.9 1-3 95.s 0.1
N. I~fr.g...u 0. 9S.9 1-4 97.3 1.9 1.6
ID0.4 96.2 1-5 97.6 2.4 1.4
0.4
360.8 94.2 2-1 993 .9 1.1
.S93.0 2-3 .
L6 20
240.9 91.0 )--1 99.0. .1
40 09 9.34 21 9. . 0.4
14 0 95.4 2.2 957 .2 0.3
.0
12 96.1 2- 94. 3. .
94.f 1. 95.0 1-1 92.7 -2.1 .
16 .. i. !-1 93. 1 .2 -
92. 11* 3. ! 1.4 0.1
92.8 2.7 15 1. 13 -.
42 0.
972 98.2 3- 7.8 0.4 0.
0.6 -3
182 9.3 -0 -.
17.a~
4 -.. . ----
0.8 . . 46 '. 0
16 - -... -. -.
9461.
60 1.n 1-2 9.1 -2 -. 4
98C0.OPY - --
le
,Best AvailableCp
DASHED LINE INDICATES
APPROXIMATE FORCE ON
3
SAMPLER x 10
KG 0 I 2 3
RELATIVE DENSITY, % I I I Ii
CM IN 30 40 50 s0 70 LE 0 2 4 6 6
00
2';DRIVE NO.
40 . 3
z ;eo
- --..-
I--A
in 30 Z- AVR
i-...AVERAG .C r---
a. 80- PLACED
0 DENSITY. 2I
a. __ __ _ __- -- -
0 36 -
-J42
30 . .. -- . -*-2
120 0
800
LB/CU FT
10
9 5 96
-
97:
- *
789
I 0 102 -4
-005
04
005
8 12
0.15
PLACMEN
DESITYANDDENITY VARIATION FROM
OF SAMPLED INCREME'__TS VDEPTH PLACED DENSITY
COMPUTED FROM "tOTAL wEIGHT AOVOLUME OF SPECIMEN
LEGEN DENSITY TEST RESULTS
, PLCI ENITY, REID BEDFORD SAND
I SAMPLED DENSITY
=
1-3 FIRST SAMPLE-THIRD NOMINAL RELATIVE DENSITY1 Dr 400
SAMPLE INCROMENT (SPECIMEN 2 )
13< PLATE 1
-- 17
RELATIVE DENSITY, % I I I I
CM IN 20 30 40 50 60 70LB 0 2 4 6 a
20 120
12- -- ~----4.-
40 1-3 0
5 w AVERAGE _
a. 30 PLACED--- - -__
6.0 DENS171Y 0 --oz
0 122
0 3
00 2-3 01
0
120
I ,o. ,I
C L 48-0 - 442---
Ic 60 . 4-2
PLATE 2 . ,
DASHED LINE INDICATES
APPROXIMATE FORCE ON
SAMPLER x 103
KG 0 I 2 3
RELATIVE DENSITY, % I I I I
CM IN 0 10 20 ::a 40 50 LEI 0 . 4 6 8
I0
-- I |
1,l-2
20._ I\
-
4o~~~ TD '*l .
PLACED ,
40 DENS17* 1- 0
w 60 -- 24
U. so -
0 2 c
It u 2-3
01
2-3 '0
0o
J_ O-
42-- ---- I
120 -
r 48 .. ..- _I
3-i
40 -5 RVE NO. 0
160 -
". ":PLATE 3
I
RELATIVE DENSITY, % DRIVE
CM IN 0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 NO.
20 '-
12 - --- - I- - -I
40 -Io 1-3 0
*118
1-4 0
24 I60 - -
0 AEEslrES
0 3 [ --
--
3: 100 0
0
12 -~ 482 - -1
0.
w
4 54 - 42 {-0
80PLCELNT EIYD ENSIT VAITO 0RO
140 -
i. 80- D'S'
LACED EDBDODSN
PLATE 4 5w
-11
I
I
RELATIVE DENSITY, % DRIVE
CM IN 30 40 50 60 70 NO
20
60
12- ,---4- q1 -2, I
40 DENSI TY* *
0) PLACD3-
U))
t80 -37A I 0
38
w , 0 - 24.- .- t-- - 2----+ '
3:100 4240
-31 I, _
I 120 48 -- ,-- ---.----
140 -- 1
60
L/U T929 4 9 B 9 O O 12- 019 4 0 • 8!
880 ---
PLATE 5
RELATIVE DENSITY, % DRIVE
CM IN I0 20 30 40 50 60 NO
20 -
1
1-2I 0
12 I 1-3
40 -
o T I
60 - 2 L
(22
0O 4;> -v :
______ uc -", Iorocr
.I'
I-_j 120 - 481 P -.
0 -° 0 TT OVER G
,IoI I C i I , I o
PLATE 6 58
RELATIVE DENSITY, % DRIVE
CM IN. 5 0 60 70 80 90 NO.
0 r F7T I -!
6 -I6i! PLACED OCN,sry* 0
20
6
1I 4-- EI
40 - is,1-31
. 0 - 24-
0 I I 2-0
0
0.--i~III 36
2-211
oo 3 2-3
0O
w 42 _-4
20 , ,
w
03-
43 -I 3- --- 0
54
143
,
I, ! i ' I I 3
ISO I; , I i
ISO 72
LB/CU FT 27 ge 99 l00 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 -2 0 2 4 G
.. . * I I ,*, , .. .. I !
GM/CC 1.60 1.65 1.70 -003 0 0.05
DRY DEINJSITY, Yd DRY DENSITYf d
PLACEMENT DENSITY AND DENSiTY VARIATION FROM
OF SAMPLED INCREMENTS VS DEPTH PLACED DENSITY
It
I FROM Box DENSITY MEASUREMENTS
5.4: "PLATE 7
I!
I
I
I
i
:ij
APPENDIX A
PETROGRAPHIC EXAMINATION OF
60-
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P 0 BOX 631
vICKSBURG. MISSISSIPPI 39180
General
Size-distribution statistics
* mm = 2 "0
** Wentworth scale.
WESSG 23 April 1974
SUBJECT: Petrographic Examination of the Reid-Bedford Model Sand I
I
Petrography
A 8 C D E
RoundnDes chL,&c. A: Angular. I: Subangular C: Subroundelt. D: Rounded.
E:Well Rounded.
6< 2
I
5. Preliminary examination of gross sample with nonpolarizing,
binocular mi.zroscope. The sand consists predominantly of tan to light
brown quartz sand. Two types may be distinguished as (a) a clear, un-
N'eathered, subangular type, and (b) a cloudy, less angular variety.
These two types comprise roughly subequal rroportions of the sample.
Possibly some of the cloudy grains are felds.ar. Moscovite mica is
present and comprises less than 5 percent of he sample; the mica is
considerably coarser (,- 1. 00 nrn) than the accompanying quartz.
Identifiable 'heavy" minerals include tourmaline, garnet, and p,,.-umed
amphibole-pyroxene minerals; no magnetic minerals were detected. The
heavies are estimated to comprise no more than 1-2 percent of the total
sample. The sample appears free of visible organic matter.
3
WESSG Z3 April 1974
SUBJECT: Petrographic Examination of the Reid .Bedford Model Sand
Mineralogical summary
Table 1
Mineralogical Composition
Particle morphology
1). The degree of rout ding is, in part. a function of size: ordinarily the
coarser particles exhibi; better rounding than the finer ones. This is the
case with the Reid-Bedfo-d. AlIthough the coarser particles are classed
as subangular to subrour ded, the finer particles ,less than 0. 25 mrn) are
subangular. The overall classif:cation is subangular to subrounded.
64<
II HE- - ____
65<5
- - __(a)
0.mrI2
(b)
0. m
125
Fig.1. hoto
o Rei-Befordsan
icrgraps
take wih
icrscoe:
nnpoarizng a) N. 6 sive nd () N. 10 seve
404
0. 074 mm
(b)
0. 074 mm
(b)
0. 046 mm
Cooper, Stafford S
Laboratory investigation of undisturbed sampling of
cohesionless material below the water table, by Stafford
S. Cooper. Vicksburg, U. S. Army Engineer Waterwnvs
Experiment Stition, 1976.
1 v. (various paging) illus. 27 cm. (U. S. Water-
ways Experiment Station. Research report S-76-t)
Prepared for Office. Chief of Engineers, V. S. Army.
Washington, D. C., under CWtS 31145.
Includes bibliography.