PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT

Words 957 Date August 21,2019

Characters 5944 Exclude Url

9% 91% 4 39
Plagiarism Unique Plagiarized Unique Sentences
Sentences
Content Checked For Plagiarism

Variables: The independent variable chosen for the study is ‘Awareness on Vicarious Liability’. The author has adopted
Random Sampling method for the study. The statistical tools used by the author are Chi square tests and frequency table.
Analysis & Explanation: The Author has adopted Empirical method to do this Non-Doctrinal study. The total sample size for
the given study is 1376. The independent variable chosen for the study is ‘Basic Legal Awareness’ of the individuals. The author
has adopted Random Sampling method for the study. The statistical tools used are Frequency analysis, Chi square tests and
ANOVA test. The questions analysed are: The questions analysed are: 1. Is the father responsible if his son commits a crime? 2.
Do you agree that if a person pays someone to commit a crime, he should be punished? 2. Age * 61. Is the father responsible
if his son commits a crime? Crosstab Count 61. Is the father responsible if his son commits a crime? Total YES NO 2. Age 18-24
297 195 492 25-40 376 262 638 ABOVE 40 214 128 342i Total 887 585 1472 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymptotic Significance (2-
sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.235a 2 .539 Likelihood Ratio 1.238 2 .538 Linear-by-Linear Association .278 1 .598 N of Valid Cases
1472 a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 135.92. Symmetric Measures Value
Asymptotic Standardized Errora Approximate Tb Approximate Significance Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.014 .026 -.527
.598c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.013 .026 -.481 .630c N of Valid Cases 1472 a. Not assuming the null
hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
Interpretation: Using the Chi square test, it was found that p value is greater than 0.05, which shows that the null hypothesis is
accepted. Therefore, there is no significant association between the age and the responsibility of father when his son commits
a crime. 2. Age * 62. Do you agree that if a person pays someone to commit a crime, he should be punished? Crosstab Count
62. Do you agree that if a person pays someone to commit a crime, he should be punished? Total STRONGLY AGREE AGREE 2.
Age 18-24 297 195 492 25-40 376 262 638 ABOVE 40 214 128 342 Total 887 585 1472 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymptotic
Significance (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.235a 2 .539 Likelihood Ratio 1.238 2 .538 Linear-by-Linear Association .278 1 .598 N
of Valid Cases 1472 a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 135.92. Symmetric
Measures Value Asymptotic Standardized Errora Approximate Tb Approximate Significance Interval by Interval Pearson's R -
.014 .026 -.527 .598c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.013 .026 -.481 .630c N of Valid Cases 1472 a. Not assuming the
null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
Interpretation: Using the Chi square test, it was found that p value is greater than 0.05, which shows that the null hypothesis is
accepted. Therefore, there is no significant association between the age of a person and the crime committed by him through
another. Analysis & Discussion: 1. The above table shows the frequency of responses of the individuals with respect to the
question of “Gender”. The questions analysed are: a. Is the father responsible if his son commits a crime? b. Do you agree that
if a person pays someone to commit a crime, he should be punished? 2. On application of the Pearson Chi square formula, it
is found that the expected count is greater than 0.05, indicating verification of the null hypothesis and the rejection of the
alternative hypothesis. Thus it may be inferred from the statistical data that there is no significant association between the
age and the responsibility of father when his son commits a crime. 3. On application of the Pearson Chi square formula, it is
found that the expected count is greater than 0.05, indicating verification of the null hypothesis and the rejection of the
alternative hypothesis. Thus it may be inferred from the statistical data that there is no significant association between the
age of a person and the crime committed by him through another. Conclusion: Different moral and lawful principles of
vicarious liability are pertinent in the advanced world; for instance, vicarious parental liability is relevant in present day world
with the increased child negligence and child crimes. However, it is exploitative to consider a parent is in charge of a
wrongdoing of his kid without the parent, like at school. Worker's proceeded with liability is likewise appropriate in the cutting
edge world since it considers both the business and the representative can reimburse one of the gatherings. For instance, the
representative's proceeded with liability and reimbursement is right now embraced by every one of the states in the US and
numerous different countries over the world. The businesses vicarious liability is relevant in the cutting edge world since it
considers the enthusiasm of both the business and the representative. Segments of the principal's vicarious liability are
additionally appropriate in the cutting edge society particularly with increment in loaning in the engine business. Different
moral issues have been brought up in the use of vicarious liability. Move of liability from one gathering to the next can be
moral or exploitative in various liabilities in the cutting edge society. A portion of the vicarious liabilities are appropriate in the
advanced world; for instance, bosses' liability, parental liability, liability of enterprises in tort, and representatives' proceeded
with liability and repayment. However, different vicarious liabilities like the principals' liability have been rejected from the
with liability and repayment. However, different vicarious liabilities like the principals' liability have been rejected from the
modern world of business because of its exploitativeness and inefficiency.

Sources Similarity
Solved: A. 0 Cells (0.0%) Have Expected Count Less Than 5....Compare text
Show transcribed image text a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.86. a. Not
assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. Finally, which of the following
represents the correct way to write out... 7%
https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/-0-cells-00-expected-count-less-5-minimum-
expected-count-1386--assuming-null-hypothesis-b--q21988821

Sample SPSS reliability outputCompare text

b. using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. reliab for chr vs. reason. crosstab a_mode2 by b_mode2 /cellsb.
using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. ** transform second f.ex code into either person-situation- 7%
interaction (ps3) or just...
http://research.clps.brown.edu/SocCogSci/Coding/SPSSreliability_output.html