G E N E R A T I O N OF WAVES BY WIND

STATE OF T H E ART

by

Charles L . Bretschneider

P r e s e n t e d 3,t

I n t e r n a t i o n a l S u m m e r Course
L u n t e r e n , The Netherlands

September 1-18, 1964

Conference sponsored by

Netherlands U n i v e r s i t y I n t e r n a t i o n a l Cooperation and

North Atlantic Treaty Organization

P r e p a r a t i o n of Notes sponsored by

O f f i c e of N a v a l R e s e a r c h
D e p a r t m e n t of the Navy
Washington, D . C , , 20360

C o n t r a c t Noo Nonr-4177(00)

NESCO R e p o r t SN-134-6
J a n u a r y 15., ^1965

N A T I O N A L E N G I N E E R I N G SCIENCE C O M P A N Y
. 1001 Connecticut Avenue, N . W ,
Washington, D. C. , 20036

R E P R O D U C T I O N I N W H O L E OR I N P A R T IS P E R M I T T E D FOR A N Y
PURPOSE O F T H E U N I T E D STATES G O V E R N M E N T
 T A B L E OF CONTENTS
Page

T A B L E OF CONTENTS 111
V
LIST OF FIGURES

PREFACE ix.

1
I, INTRODUCTION

II. P R A C T I C A L APPLICATIONS - - DEEP WATER 17

A. S I G N I F I C A N T W A V E CONCEPT 1'^

B. C O M P L E X N A T U R E OF SEA S U R F A C E 20

1. Wave V a r i a b i l i t y

C. W A V E S P E C T R U M CONCEPTS 39

D. F R O U D E S C A L I N G OF T H E W A V E S P E C T R U M 46

IIL P R O P A G A T I O N O F WAVES A N D SWELLS I N T O 50

SHALLOW WATER

IV. G E N E R A T I O N OF WIND WAVES I N S H A L L O W W A T E ^ 6Z

A. G E N E R A T I O N OF W I N D WAVES OVER A B O T T O M 62
OF CONSTANT D E P T H
68
V. D E C A Y OF WAVES I N D E E P W A T E R
76
VI. W A V E STATISTICS

vn. WIND SPEED VERSUS WIND S P E E D 79

84
REFERENCES

111
 LIST OF FIGURES

1. Wave M o t i o n at I n t e r f a c e of Two D i f f e r e n t F l u i d s 2

2. N o r m a l and T a n g e n t i a l E n e r g y T r a n s f e r , A i r to Water 5

3. F e t c h Graph f o r Deep Water 21

4. Deep W a t e r Wave F o r e c a s t i n g Curves as a F u n c t i o n of 22

Wind Speed, F e t c h Length and W i n d D u r a t i o n

5. R e l a t i o n of E f f e c t i v e F e t c h to W i d t h - L e n g t h Ratio f o r 23
Rectangular Fetches

6. Methods of Wave R e c o r d A n a l y s i s 24

7. H-1- F- T D i a g r a m f o r F o r e c a s t i n g W i n d - G e n e r a t e d 26
Waves

8. Graph R e l a t i n g Wave Height to Wind Speed and D u r a t i o n , 27

and to Fetch; f o r Oceanic W a t e r s

9. Graph R e l a t i n g Wave Height to W i n d Speed and D u r a t i o n , 28

and to F e t c h ; f o r Coastal Waters
10, Graph R e l a t i n g Wave P e r i o d to W i n d Speed and D u r a t i o n , 29
and to Fetch; f o r Oceanic W a t e r s
11. Graph R e l a t i n g Wave P e r i o d to W i n d Speed and D u r a t i o n , 29
and to Fetch; f o r Coastal W a t e r s

12. S t a t i s t i c a l D i s t r i b u t i o n of Heights 30

13. Period Spectrum 30

14. D i s t r i b u t i o n Functions f o r P e r i o d V a r i a b i l i t y and 32

Height V a r i a b i l i t y

15. Sample W e i b u l l D i s t r i b u t i o n D e t e r m i n a t i o n f o r Wave 35

Height
16. Sample W e i b u l l D i s t r i b u t i o n D e t e r m i n a t i o n f o r Wave 36
Period
17. Scatter D i a g r a m of 1 and A f o r 400 Consecutive Waves 37
f r o m the Gulf of M e x i c o

18. Ratio of Wave Heights to the Square of A p p a r e n t Wave 41

Periods; H/T^

'.V
 Page_

19. D u r a t i o n Graph: C o - C u m u l a t i v e Spectra f o r W i n d 43

Speeds f r o m ZO to 36 Knots as a F u n c t i o n of D u r a t i o n

ZO. F e t c h Graph: C o - C u m u l a t i v e Spectra f o r W i n d Speeds 44

f r o m ZO to 36 Knots as a F u n c t i o n of F e t c h

Zl. C o m p a r i s o n of P e r i o d Spectrum f o r 6Z-foot S i g n i f i c a n t 49

Wave w i t h Station " J " Data

ZZ. Refraction Effect 51

Z3. D i v e r g i n g Orthogonals 52

Z4. Converging Orthogonals 53

Z5. E x p e r i m e n t a l Length ^ X of R i s i n g Sea B o t t o m i n 55

D i r e c t i o n of M o t i o n

Z6. Relationship f o r F r i c t i o n L o s s over a B o t t o m of Constant 60

Depth

Z7. Kg v e r s u s T^/d^ 61

Z,8. Generation of W i n d O v e r a B o t t o m of Constant Depth 63

f o r U n l i m i t e d W i n d D u r a t i o n Represented as D i m e n s i o n -
less P a r a m e t e r s

29. Wave F o r e c a s t i n g Relationships f o r Shallow W a t e r of 64

Constant Depth

30. G r o w t h of Waves i n a L i m i t e d Depth 65

31. Wave Spectra f o r A t l a n t i c C i t y , N . J . 67

32. F o r e c a s t i n g Curves f o r Wave Decay 69

33. Decay of Wave Spectra w i t h Distance 70

34. Decay of S i g n i f i c a n t Waves w i t h Distance 71

35. T y p i c a l Change of Wave E n e r g y S p e c t r u m i n the 73

B u i l d - u p and Decay of Waves

36. Example of P e r i o d Spectra of Combined L o c a l S t o r m 74

and Swell

37. Example of F r e q u e n c y Spectrum of Combined L o c a l 75

S t o r m and Swell

38. C o m p a r i s o n of Wave Height D i s t r i b u t i o n s D e r i v e d f r o m 78

V i s u a l Observations and f r o m M e a s u r e m e n t s of Wave
Heights at A t l a n t i c Ocean Stations I and J

vi
39. Geostrophic W i n d Scale 80

40. Surface Wind Scale 81

41. Computed vs. Observed Surface W i n d Speed f o r 43 83

Randomly Selected P o i n t s

vii
 PREFACE

T h i s r e p o r t was p r e p a r e d o r i g i n a l l y as a s e r i e s of l e c t u r e s given
at the I n t e r n a t i o n a l Summer Course on "Some Aspects of Shallow Water
Oceanology" h e l d at L u n t e r e n , the Netherlands, The subject of t h i s
phase of the l e c t u r e s , " G e n e r a t i o n of Waves by W i n d , " i n c l u d e d both
deep and shallow water c o n d i t i o n s . The decay of s w e l l i n both deep and
shallow water was also discussed. I n a d d i t i o n to the o r i g i n a l p r e p a r e d
m a n u s c r i p t , t h i s r e p o r t includes some m a t e r i a l r e s u l t i n g f r o m the
discussions d u r i n g and f o l l o w i n g the l e c t u r e s .

ix
 G E N E R A T I O N OF WAVES BY WIND
STATE OF T H E ART

I, INTRODUCTION
When a i r f l o w s over a w a t e r s u r f a c e waves are f o r m e d . T h i s is
an observable phenomenon. Just why waves f o r m when a i r f l o w s over
the water is a question about nature w h i c h has not yet been answered
c o m p l e t e l y or s a t i s f a c t o r i l y by t h e o r e t i c a l means, F u r t h e r m o r e , why do
waves have the heights and p e r i o d s that are observed? A l l t h e o r i e s
begin either w i t h the a s s u m p t i o n that waves do f o r m when w i n d blows over
the water s u r f a c e , or else that waves m u s t a l r e a d y exist by the t i m e the
w i n d begins to blow, or else the t h e o r y is i m m o b i l e .

The b r o t h e r s E r n s t H e i n r i c h and W i l h e l m Weber (1825) w e r e the

f i r s t known to r e p o r t e x p e r i m e n t s on waves, and A . P a r i s (18TI) made
actual wave observations on the state of the sea. These observations
w e r e made aboard the D U P L I E X and the M I N I E R V A . A l t h o u g h A i r y (1848)
did t h e o r y on waves and t i d e s , w i n d f o r c e s were not i n c l u d e d . Other
e a r l y c o n t r i b u t i o n s on wave observations at sea included A b e r c r o m b y
(1888), Schott (1893), and Gassenmayr (1896). However, the best e a r l y
documentation on wave observations was perhaps that p r e p a r e d by C o r n i s h
(1904, 1910 and 1934). C o r n i s h also attempted to r e l a t e wave conditions
to m e t e o r o l o g i c a l and geographical conditions.

Rather than t h i n k i n g of the s c i e n t i s t i n the r o l e of a n s w e r i n g the

question "Why do waves f o r m , " one m i g h t r a t h e r t h i n k of h i m as a
p r a c t i c a l engineer who knows that the phenomenon does occur and who
can then r e c o m m e n d what should be done about i t . P r o g r e s s is made
only by engineering a p p l i c a t i o n of s c i e n t i f i c t h e o r y . T h e o r y o f f e r s no
p r o g r e s s , except when i m p l e m e n t e d ; o t h e r w i s e i t is d o r m a n t .

Since a l i t t l e t h e o r y has never h u r t a p r a c t i c a l engineer, an

oceanographer, or an applied s c i e n t i s t , i t seems quite a p p r o p r i a t e to
m e n t i o n v a r i o u s t h e o r i e s w h i c h have been proposed t h r o u g h v a r i o u s
stages i n the advancement of the state of the a r t .

Although Stevenson (1864) established the f i r s t known e m p i r i c a l

f o r m u l a f o r wave generation, the c l a s s i c a l w o r k on w i n d wave t h e o r y was
due to L o r d K e l v i n (1887) and H e l m h o l t z (1888). The K e l v i n - H e l m h o l t z
t h e o r y , w h i c h can be found i n H y d r o d y n a m i c s , by L a m b (1945), p e r t a i n s
to the study of the o s c i l l a t i o n s set up at the i n t e r f a c e of two f l u i d m e d i a
of d i f f e r e n t densities - - w a t e r and a i r , f o r example.

H e l m h o l t z c o n s i d e r e d the m e d i a of mass densities f ^ and

flowing with velocities U^ and U ^ w i t h respect to each other as
i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g u r e 1.

1
 Figure 1

The i n t e r f a c e i s a wave surface., f ^ and U^^ the naas? densitA'

and v e l o c i t y of the upper f l u i d , and f ^ and the mass density ana
v e l o c i t y of the l o w e r f l u i d , r e s p e c t i v e l y . The propagational v e l o c i t y C
is the speed at w h i c h the i n t e r f a c e t r a v e l s i n a f o r w a r d d i r e c t i o n , a r d
L is the distance between two successive peaks of the i n t e r f a c e .

Helmholtz. (1888) showed that the induced o s c i l l a t i o n , i f s m a l l

c o m p a r e d w i t h the distance L - took the f o r m of a wave t r a i n at the
i n t e r f a c e t r a v e l i n g at the v e l o c i t y C such that

where g i s the a c c e l e r a t i o n of g r a v i t y and k is the wave number give-

as k = 2 - r r / L .
K e l v i n (1887) d e r i v e d the same r e s u l t i n a d i f f e r e n t manner and
made some v e r y i n t e r e s t i n g conclusions, F o r example, when = = 0
i t can be shown that
\ 9 . P \
k

If one considers the upper f l u i d to be a i r and the l o w e r f l u i d w a t e r ,

for which / I / is equal to about 1, 29 x lO"-^, then Eq. (2) reduce?
v e r y n e a r l y to the s i m p l e f o r m

w h i c h is the c l a s s i c a l equation f c r wave c e l e r i t y obtained f r o m line.^.r

wave t h e o r y .
By use of the quadratic f o r m u l a , Eq. (1) can be solved fc?, C na
one obtains:

2
 1/2
^ 1 ^2 (4)
c
( A - ^ 2 V

Now one can w r i t e Eq. (4) as f o l l o w s :

C = Ü+ C (5)

where
^ ^2"2 (6)
U =
/^2

and ƒ) ƒ,
^1^2 2 - U^)' (7)
= C

I n the above U and C r e p r e s e n t an average o f t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g

values of U and C, and i s the e x p r e s s i o n i d e n t i c a l to E q . (2).

I f C o is less than the t e r m i n v o l v i n g U ,2 i n E q . (7), i t w i l l

be found that C becomes i m a g i n a r y , w h i c h i m p l i e s a c o n d i t i o n of m - ^
s t a b i l i t y i n the development of the waves, and t h i s leads to a p r o g r e s s i v e
i n c r e a s e i n a m p l i t u d e . Under these conditions the w i n d is t r a v e l i n g f a s t e r
than the waves and t h e r e w i l l be a continuous t r a n s f e r of energy to the
waves, w h i c h i n t u r n goes into the f o r m of i n c r e a s e i n wave height and
i n c r e a s e i n wave c e l e r i t y . The t e r m U^ - U^ represents^the^wind v e l o c i t y
i n c r e a s e in wcLve t;eiexiuy. ^xi.'^ 1,^x1^.^ ^ 2 ^ j ^ "x-* U1
1
r e l a t i v e to the water and i s u s u a l l y expressed s i m p l y by U = U2
The condition of i n s t a b i l i t y is defined when
1+
(8)

Since f^lf^.^ 1.29X 10' one m a y obtain

U > 28 C
(9)
C
o <^~2F

O
The r a t i o tr has been defined as the wave age, and waves are
unstable when t h e i r wave age i s less than 1/28; t h i s i n s t a b i l i t y m a n i f e s t s
i t s e l f as a p r o g r e s s i v e i n c r e a s e i n wave a m p l i t u d e .

3
 F r o m other considerations i t can be shown that the s m a l l e s t
v e l o c i t y that a c a p i l l a r y wave (such as a r i p p l e ) can have is 23. 2 c m / s e c ,
c o r r e s p o n d i n g to a wave length of 1. 7 c m . and a p e r i o d of . 073 second?.
W o r k by C r a p p e r ( 1957), Schooley (I960) and P i e r sen (1961) show? thar
because of n o n l i n e a r e f f e c t s , the 1.7 c m . is somewhat l o w . A c c o r d i n g t o
K e l v i n (1887) the waves w i l l always be unstable i f U > 28 x 23, 2 c m / sec.
That i s , i f U > 6. 5 m / s e c (12. 5 k n o t s ) , then the waves are unstable.
U = 6. 5 m / s e c i s also c a l l e d the c r i t i c a l w i n d speed r e q m r e d f o r g r a v i t y
wave generation. A c c o r d i n g to M u n k (1947) t h e r e is a c r i t i c a l w i n d speed
below w h i c h waves do not f o r m . T h e r e have been numerous a r t i c l e s on
the subject of c r i t i c a l w i n d speed, some s u p p o r t i n g and others objecting
to the existence of a c r i t i c a l wind speed. R e f e r e n c e is made to the w o r k
of Cox and M u n k (1956), L a t e r M u n k (1957) appears t o be dubious as t o
whether or not a c r i t i c a l w i n d speed e x i s t s , c i t i n g the w o r k of M e n d e l -
baum (1956) and L a w f o r d and V e l e y (1956). I f a c r i t i c a l w i n d speed e x i s t s ,
i t appears f r o m a l l l i t e r a t u r e sources that i t exists appro-ximately between
2 and 6 m e t e r s per second.

The concept of c r i t i c a l w i n d speed is indeed a c o n t r o v e r s i a l sub-

j e c t at p r e s e n t . N e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e r e i s s t i l l b e l i e f that there is a c r i t i c a l
w i n d speed somewhere between 4 and 6 m / s e c . , and that below the c r i t i c a l
w i n d speed the f l u i d f l o w i s h y d r o d y n a m i c a l l y smooth or l a m i n a r and
above the c r i t i c a l w i n d speed t u r b u l e n c e develops and the i n t e r f a c e
becomes h y d r o d y n a m i c a l l y rough, f o r w h i c h wave amplitudes i n c r e a s e
w i t h t i m e and distance.

The d i f f i c u l t y w i t h t h i s t h e o r y i s that t h e r e is a density d i f f e r e n c e

between a i r and water even when the w i n d does not blow, and yet no waves
are f o r m e d . Thus density d i f f e r e n c e alone is i n s u f f i c i e n t to s t a r t wave
generation; the waves m u s t a l r e a d y have existed by some other means,^
then they can propagate as f r e e g r a v i t y waves. I f there is a c r i t i c a l wind
speed the w i n d i s a l r e a d y b l o w i n g , but t h e r e are no waves. W i t h an
i n c r e a s e i n w i n d speeds, waves do f o r m . Why?

I t was not u n t i l 1925 that J e f f r e y s i n t r o d u c e d the t h e o r y of " s h e l f e r i n p

hypothesis, " based on the concept of a h y d r o d y n a m i c a l l y rough sea r e q u i r e d
f o r wave generation. I n h i s paper " O n the F o r m a t i o n o f Waves by W i a a ,
J e f f r e y s (1925) proposed that eddies on the l e e w a r d side of the waves
r e s u l t e d i n a r e d u c t i o n of n o r m a l p r e s s u r e as c o m p a r e d w i t h the w i n d -
w a r d face and i n a consequent t r a n s f e r of energy f r o m wind to waves.
H i s r e s u l t s suggested that the w i n d could add energy to waves only so
long as the w i n d speed was equal to or greater than the wave c e l e r i t y ,
and that when the wave c e l e r i t y became equal to the wind speed the wavers
reached m a x i m u m height and the sea was one of steady state. A l s o , the
lowest w i n d speed r e q u i r e d f o r wave generation was cn the order- o^ two
knots, or about one m e t e r per second. I t appears that the value 'i-i two
knots i s the best accepted value f o r the c r i t i c a l w i n d speed.

D u r i n g the ten y e a r s f o l l o w i n g the w o r k of J e f f r e y s , somewhat

m o r e detailed observations were made of the sea surfa.ce c o n d i t i o n s .

4
F o r example, Schumacher (1928) r e p o r t e d the f i r s t known study of
"Stereophotography of Waves" f r o m the G e r m a n A t l a n t i c E x p e d i t i o n ,
and W e i n b l u m and B l o c k (1936) also r e p o r t e d r e s u l t s on stereophoto-
g r a m m e t r i c wave r e c o r d s . T h i s l a t t e r c o n t r i b u t i o n gave r e s u l t s of
m e a s u r e m e n t s c a r r i e d out on b o a r d the m o t o r ship SAN FRANCISCO,
under o b s e r v a t i o n of V . C o r n i s h . Other data on waves d u r i n g t h i s p e r i o d
included that of W i l l i a m s (1934), who r e p o r t e d on sea and s w e l l o b s e r v a -
t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g e a r l y methods of obtaining data, and W h i t e m a r s h (1935)
who r e v i e w e d data on unusual sea conditions as r e p o r t e d by m a r i n e r s ,
and discussed the cause of high waves at 'sea and the e f f e c t of these waves
on shipping.
A f t e r the founding of the Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d i n the War D e p a r t -
m e n t i n the e a r l y 1930's, serious r e s e a r c h began on t h e o r y and f o r m a -
t i o n of g r a v i t y waves. The f i r s t i m p o r t a n t r e p o r t was completed i n 1941
and published i n 1948, " A Study of P r o g r e s s i v e O s c i l l a t o r y Waves i n
W a t e r , " by M a r t i n A . M a s o n (1948). T h i s r e p o r t updated the state of the
a r t to about 1940.

The next great advance i n the t h e o r y of wave generation i n deep

water was that by S v e r d r u p and M u n k (1947), although Suthons (1945)
had a l r e a d y p r e p a r e d f o r e c a s t i n g methods f o r sea and s w e l l waves.
Whereas J e f f r e y s (1925) took into account only the t r a n s f e r of energy by
n o r m a l s t r e s s e s , S v e r d r u p and M u n k c o n s i d e r e d both n o r m a l and t a n -
gential s t r e s s e s . (See F i g u r e 2.)

Figure 2

The average r a t e at which energy i s t r a n s f e r r e d to a wave by

n o r m a l p r e s s u r e is equal to

p w dx (10)
^N " 17 o

where w = - k A C cos k (x - Ct) is the v e r t i c a l component of the p a r t i c l e

o
l o c i t y at the s u r f a c e , and p is the n o r m a l p r e s s u r e acting on the sea
ve
surface. L i s the wave length.

5
 The average r a t e at w h i c h energy i s transnaitted to the waves by
tangential s t r e s s i s equal to

R = _- I (L u ax (11)
^T L I
'o
u denotes the h o r i z o n t a l component of p a r t i c l e v e l o c i t y at the sea surface,
o
and is the w i n d s t r e s s .
u = k A C s i n k (x - Ct) U2)
o

where is the r e s i s t a n c e c o e f f i c i e n t . V a r i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s and obser^-

vations have been made leading to c o n t r o v e r s i a l values of f as a
Iunct?on of w i n d speed. H o w e v e r , a number of d i f f e r e n t a u t h o r i t i e s appear
to have advocated a value of close to 2. 6 x 10" , and i t is this value
u t i l i z e d by S v e r d r u p and M u n k (1947).
A c c o r d i n g to the above a r g u m e n t s , the energy of waves ^an i n -
crease only i f ( R j ^ + R^^' ''^^^ ^^^"""^ ^""^""^^
n o r m a l and t a n g e n t i a l s t r e s s e s of the w i n d , exceeds R ^ . the r a t e at
w h i c h energy i s d i s s i p a t e d by v i s c o s i t y . The energy added by the w i n d
goes into b u i l d i n g the wave height and i n c r e a s i n g the wave speed. T h a t
is, R ° R = ' ^^^"^^ ^^^^ p o r t i o n of energy t r a n s -
f o r m e d into wave heights and R ^ is that p o r t i o n of energy t r a n s f o r m e d
into wave speed.
D u r i n g the e a r l y stages of wave development^moBt of t ^
is t r a n s m i t t e d by n o r m a l s t r e s s e s , but when C / b > 0 37 the t r a n s
m i s s i o n by t a n g e n t i a l s t r e s s is dominant. The e f f e c t of the n o r m a l
Stresses l o m i n a t e s f o r a s h o r t t i m e only. D u r i n g the t i m e that t h e waves
are g r o w i n g , the e f f e c t of the tangential s t r e s s i s m.ost i m p o r t a n t . Whe...
are g r o w i g _ ^ ^^^^^ t a n g e n t i a l s t r e s s , but t h e r e i s a sma 1
amount l o s t due to n o r m a l p r e s s u r e , and, f o r t h i s reason ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
w r i t t e n w i t h + R^^ . When R ^ = R ^ t R ^ ' the wavea-are said to have
reached m a x i m u m height and c e l e r i t y f o r a P f . ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ J ^ ^ ^ f f f . o m e »
are independent of f e t c h length and w i n d d u r a t i o n . T h i s c o n d i t i o n ... . o m e
t i m e s c a l l e d the f u l l y developed sea.
A c c o r d i n g to the w o r k of S v e r d r u p and M u n k (1947), the s o l u t i o n
of the h y d r o d y n a m i c equation d e s c r i b i n g wave generation ^^^ailed a
knowledge of c e r t a i n c o e f f i c i e n t s or constants r e s u l t i n g f r o m ma.thematxcal
f n t e l r a t i o n w h i c h , of c o u r s e , could not be d e t e r m i n e d by t.heory alone.
The a p p r o p r i a t e constants were d e t e r m i n e d by use of e m p i r i c a l data.

6
Hence, there was no way of knowing whether or not the theory was c o r r e c t .
In order to evaluate these constants it was n e c e s s a r y to r e s o r t to
empirical wind and wave data, which at that time was very limited. Wind
speeds, fetch lengths and wind durations were estimated from meteor-
ological situations, the data of which were also based on v e r y meager
coverage. The waves were estimated by visible means. Out of this
theoretical investigation grew the concept of the significant wave. The
significant wave height was estimated as the average wave height of the
waves in the higher group of waves, which later became identified very
closely as the average of the highest one-third of the waves in a r e c o r d
of about 20 minutes duration. The significant wave period was the c o r -
responding average period of these waves.

According to t h è theory as evaluated with "ancient" data for the

significant wave, the fully developed sea resulted in the foUowing relations:

gH/U^ = 0, 26

and

|I= = C / U = 1, 37

where H and T are the significant wave height and period respectively,
and U is the wind speed. It then became quite apparent for any situation,
either wind waves or swell, that a whole spectrum of waves was present,
including a probability distribution of wave heights and a probability d i s t r i -
bution of wave periods. Much of the above work was performed during the
days of World War II. Otherwise e a r l i e r publications would have appeared
in the literature. In fact, as early as 1935, the Imperial Japanese Navy
encountered a typhoon in the P a c i f i c Ocean and many observations were
taken but were not published until much later by Arakawa and Suda (1953).

The time had then a r r i v e d when no further advance in wave gen-

eration theory could be made without reliable recorded data and an
advance in statistical theory and data reduction and analysis. T h e r e is
no necessity to discuss wave recording here since this subject is well
covered by Tucker (1964).

B a r b e r and U r s e l l (1948) were perhaps the next to present a v e r y

important paper. The results of their investigation proved the existence
of a spectrum of waves. A completely new field of theory and r e s e a r c h
had been initiated, but it should be noted that oceanographers were slow
to take advantage of this concept. T h i s r e s e a r c h had laid the foundation
upon which many advances have been made in the "state of the a r t , " and it
is because of this r e s e a r c h that the Sverdrup-Munk (1947) works are con-
sidered "ancient. "

Although much r e s e a r c h was c a r r i e d out during the next few y e a r s ,

no great advances in the state of the art were published until T h i j s se and
Schijf (1949) presented wave relationships for both deep and shallow water

7
based on wave data and some c o n s i d e r a t i o n s of the S v e r d r u p - M u n k t h e o r y .
E x p e r i m e n t s on a p a r a f f i n m o d e l of w i n d - g e n e r a t e d waves by T h i j s se and
S c h i j f show a high negative p r e s s u r e at the c r e s t of the wave, w h i c h is i n
c o n f l i c t w i t h the S v e r d r u p - M u n k concept of a constant w i n d along the f r e e
s u r f a c e , but w h i c h is i n accordance w i t h B e r n o u l l i ' s equation f o r an
i n c r e a s e i n w i n d speed at the c r e s t and a decrease at the t r o u g h . T h i s
e x p e r i m e n t was c e r t a i n l y a great c o n t r i b u t i o n .

Johnson (1950) applied the P i - t h e o r e m concept f o r d i m e n s i o n a l

analysis and presented wave r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r deep water based on a
c o l l e c t i o n of numerous data f r o m Abbots Lagoon, C a l i f o r n i a . A t the
same t i m e the U . S. A r m y Corps of Engineers (1950) had presented wave
data generated under h u r r i c a n e wind conditions f o r shallow Lake Okee-
chobee, F l o r i d a . The Corps of Engineers also presented w i n d and wave
data f o r i n l a n d r e s e r v o i r s . F o r t P e c k , Montana (1951), and l a t e r f o r Lake
T e x o m a , Texas (1953). B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1951) presented r e v i s e d wave
f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s of S v e r d r u p and M u n k ( 1947), based on the f i e l d
data of Johnson (1950), l a b o r a t o r y data of B r e t s c h n e i d e r and Rice (1951),
and numerous other data c o l l e c t e d by v a r i o u s authors, B r a c e l m (1952)
presented an unpublished r e p o r t on o b s e r v i n g , f o r e c a s t i n g , and r e p o r t i n g
ocean waves and s u r f . A n excellent s u m m a r y of wave r e c o r d i n g s was
presented by W i e g e l (1962).

I t seems that the year 1952 w i t n e s s e d the f i r s t a c c e l e r a t i o n i n

the "state of the a r t . " L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s (1952) presented the R a y l e i g h
d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r wave height v a r i a b i l i t y based upon a n a r r o w s p e c t r u m .
P u t z (1952) presented a G a m m a - t y p e d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r wave height and
wave p e r i o d v a r i a b i l i t y based ü p o n analysis of 25 t w e n t y - m i n u t e ocean
wave r e c o r d s . D a r b y s h i r e (1952) and Neumann (1952) each p r e s e n t e d wave
spectra concepts and r e l a t i o n s f o r wave generation based on c o l l e c t i o n of
wave data. The method of d e r i v a t i o n used by Neumann (1952) is c o n t r o -
v e r s i a l ; i t lead to the i n t r o d u c t i o n of a d i m e n s i o n a l constant, and f o r
h i g h f r e q u e n c y , the energy was found to be p r o p o r t i o n a l to f , where
f =^ wave f r e q u e n c y . W a t t e r s (1953) d e r i v e d the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n
of wave height v a r i a b i l i t y i n a less sophisticated m a n n e r than L o n g u e t -
H i g g i n s , and the data of D a r l i n g t o n (1954) supported the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i -
b u t i o n . I n f a c t , the G a m m a - t y p e d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r wave heights of P u t z
(1952) was r e p r e s e n t e d v e r y c l o s e l y by the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n . I c h i y e
(1953) studied the e f f e c t s of w a t e r t e m p e r a t u r e on wave generation.
Homada, M i t s u y a s u and Hase (1953) p e r f o r m e d l a b o r a t o r y tests on w i n d
and w a t e r .
The f i r s t a c c e l e r a t i o n of the "state of the a r t " d i d not mean m u c h
i n r e g a r d to the development of the t h e o r y of wave generation, since t h i s
was p u r e l y e m p i r i c a l , i n c l u d i n g both f i e l d and l a b o r a t o r y data c o l l e c t i o n ,
except f o r the w o r k of L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s (1952) and W a t t e r s (1953).

U r s e l l (1956) had surveyed the p r o b l e m of w i n d wave generation

and opened w i t h the statement that " w i n d b l o w i n g over a w a t e r s u r f a c e

8
generates waves i n the w a t e r by a p h y s i c a l p r o c e s s w h i c h cannot be
r e g a r d e d as known;" he concluded that "the p r e s e n t state of our knowledge
is p r o f o u n d l y u n s a t i s f a c t o r y . "
B r e t s c h n e i d e r and R e i d (1954) presented a t h e o r e t i c a l develop-
naent f o r the "Change i n Wave Height due to B o t t o m F r i c t i o n , P e r c o l a t i o n ,
and R e f r a c t i o n ; " B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1954) combined these r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h
the wave generation r e l a t i o n s h i p s given by Sverdrup and M u n k (1947), as
r e v i s e d by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1951), to obtain shallow water wave generation
r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r wave height and wave p e r i o d as a f u n c t i o n of w i n d speed,
f e t c h length and water depth. Sibul (1955) investigated i n the l a b o r a t o r y
the generation of wind waves i n shallow w a t e r . A s i d e f r o m the above r e f e r ¬
ences and the c o n t r i b u t i o n s of T h i j s s e and Schijf (1949) and the U . S. A r m y
Corps of E n g i n e e r s , J a c k s o n v i l l e D i s t r i c t (1950), t h e r e i s s t i l l another
c o n t r i b u t i o n on w i n d - g e n e r a t e d waves i n shallow w a t e r . I n 1953 and 19!34
Keulegan p e r f o r m e d e x p e r i m e n t s at the N a t i o n a l B u r e a u of Standards;
but as f a r as i s known, t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n has not been published. H o w e v e r ,
i t has been ascertained that the data of Keulegan i s i n agreement w i t h that
obtained f o r Lake Okeechobee and is also i n agreement w i t h the r e l a t i o n -
ships presented by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1954). Saville (1954) published a
u s e f u l r e p o r t on the e f f e c t of f e t c h w i d t h on wave generation.

Data c o l l e c t i o n , although l i m i t e d i n quantity and q u a l i t y , also

p e r s i s t e d d u r i n g the p e r i o d f r o m 1950 to about 1955. F o r example, Unoki
and Nankano (1955) i n Japan published wave data f o r H a c h i j o I s l a n d ;
T i t o v (1955) presented w o r k s i n Russian; and B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1954) did
w o r k on shallow water of the Gulf of M e x i c o .

T h e r e seems to be a t r a n s i t i o n p e r i o d d u r i n g the y e a r s 1955 to

1960 H i s ideas based on t h e o r y and v e r i f i e d w i t h data, K r y l o v (1956 and
1958) presented the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r wave height v a r i a b i l i t y and
postulated also that the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n applied to the wave length
v a r i a b i l i t y , w h i c h could be t r a n s f o r m e d into a p e r i o d d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n .
B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1957 and 1959) also v e r i f i e d the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r
wave height and wave length v a r i a b i l i t y . He developed a d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c -
t i o n f o r wave p e r i o d v a r i a b i l i t y w h i c h was i n agreement w i t h that postulated
by K r y l o v (1958) and was i n v e r y close agreement w i t h the G a m m a - t y p e
d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n f o r wave p e r i o d presented by P u t z (1952). R o l l and _
F i s c h e r (1956) made a r e v i s i o n of the s p e c t r u m by Neumann (1952), e l i m i n -
ating the d i m e n s i o n a l constant, and found that the energy at h i g h f r e q u e n c y
wks p r o p o r t i o n a l to f"^ instead of f ' ^ a c c o r d i n g to the s p e c t r u m of
Neumann (1952).
I t then became apparent that f o r a n a r r o w s p e c t r u m i t was safe to
assume that the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n applied equally w e l l f o r both wave
height and wave length v a r i a b i l i t y , the l a t t e r r e a d i l y t r a n s f o r m e d into
a wave p e r i o d d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n .

S t a t i s t i c a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of the sea by wave spectra concepts

t h r o u g h the w o r k of T u k e y (1959) and B l a c k m a n and T u k e y (1958) was

9
g r e a t l y p r o m o t e d by the staff at New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y , p a r t i c u l a r l y
P i e r s o n and M a r k s (1952).
Under the assumption that the j o i n t p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave
height and p e r i o d was u n c o r r e l a t e d , B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1957, 1958, 1959)
proposed a development of a wave s p e c t r u m concept. T h e r e seemed to
be some s i m i l a r i t y between the B r e t s c h n e i d e r s p e c t r u m and that proposed
by Neumann (1952), and f i n a l l y the f o r m of B r e t s c h n e i d e r ' s s p e c t r u m
r e s o l v e d as the proposed s p e c t r u m of P i e r s o n (1964) based on the s i m i -
l a r i t y t h e o r y of K i t a i g o r o d s k i (1961).

A t this t i m e also B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1958) again r e v i s e d the wave

f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r both deep and shallow water.- The p r a c t i c a l
graphs f o r wave f o r e c a s t i n g are given i n the r e v i s e d v e r s i o n of Beach
E r o s i o n B o a r d T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t No. 4 (1961). These r e l a t i o n s h i p s
p r e s e n t l y are undergoing a f u r t h e r r e v i s i o n w h i c h should i n c r e a s e the
accuracy of wave f o r e c a s t s .

However, d u r i n g the ten y e a r s preceding about 1955, m o s t of the

e f f o r t was devoted to a n a l y t i c a l expressions and l i t t l e to t h e o r y of wave
generation. D u r i n g the days of J e f f r e y s (1925), Sverdrup and M u n k (1947)
among others, the concept of wave spectra was not p r o m o t e d . However,
because of the wave spectra enlightenments of B a r b e r and U r s e l l (1948),
Seiwell (1948), Neumann (1952), D a r b y s h i r e (1952), B r e t s c h n e i d e r
(1957), B u r l i n g (1959), and P i e r s o n (1964), among o t h e r s , a new channel
was opened f o r wave generation t h e o r y .

A t this point m e n t i o n should be made of the great c o n t r i b u t i o n s on

wave t h e o r y , wave p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n s , and wave spectra
proposed by M i c h e (1954). I n p a r t i c u l a r , M i c h e proposed the R a y l e i g h
d i s t r i b u t i o n to wave steepness, a t h e o r y not p r e v i o u s l y proposed. T h i s
d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n should have a wide a p p l i c a t i o n f o r engineering
studies.

It was not u n t i l P h i l l i p s (1957) and M i l e s (1957) that a d d i t i o n a l

t h e o r e t i c a l concepts were developed. Sverdrup and M u n k (1947) con-
sidered that the wind was constant i n v e l o c i t y i n o r d e r to develop t h e i r
t h e o r y , but t h i s was p r o v e n o t h e r w i s e by T h i j s s e and S c h i j f (1949).
H o w e v e r , P h i l l i p s ( 1957) considered the f a c t that the wind was r a p i d l y
f l u c t u a t i n g about some mean value. I t i s v e r y t r u e that winds blowing
over water do not consist of s t r e a m s of a i r i n steady and u n i f o r m m o t i o n
but, r a t h e r , of an i r r e g u l a r s e r i e s of " p u f f s " and " l u l l s " c a r r y i n g eddies
and s w i r l s d i s t r i b u t e d i n a d i s o r d e r e d manner. The a t m o s p h e r i c eddies,
or r a n d o m v e l o c i t y f l u c t u a t i o n s i n the a i r , are associated w i t h r a n d o m
s t r e s s f l u c t u a t i o n s on the s u r f a c e , both p r e s s u r e s ( i . e. n o r m a l stresses)
and tangential s t r e s s e s . The eddies are borne f o r w a r d by the mean v e l o c i t y
of the wind and, at the same t i m e , they develop, i n t e r a c t , and decay, so
that the associated s t r e s s d i s t r i b u t i o n moves across the s u r f a c e w i t h a
c e r t a i n convection v e l o c i t y dependent upon the v e l o c i t y of the wind and
also evolves i n t i m e as i t moves along.

10
 I t is these p r e s s u r e f l u c t u a t i o n s upon the water s u r f a c e that are
responsible f o r the e a r l y generation of waves. The tangential s t r e s s is
not considered, but P h i l l i p s (1957) states i n some cases that the shear
s t r e s s a c t i o n m i g h t not be n e g l i g i b l e . The t h e o r y is i n agreement w i t h
wave observations d u r i n g the e a r l y stages of generation, but as C / U
approaches unity there a r e other wave generating processes to take into
account, such as s h e l t e r i n g and the effects of v a r i a t i o n i n shear s t r e s s e s .
Although t h i s t h e o r y tends to an u n d e r - e s t i m a t i o n of wave heights f o r
C / U close to unity, i t m a y be considered as a great advance i n wave
generation t h e o r y i n s o f a r as the i n i t i a l b i r t h and g r o w t h of waves are
concerned. A v e r y i m p o r t a n t aspect r e s u l t s f r o m P h i l l i p s (1957) fcased
on d i m e n s i o n a l considerationsi'-i. e, , tcfor hi,gh f r e q u e n c y oomponehtsi ithe
.-5
energy v a r i e s as i
M i l e s ' t h e o r e t i c a l m o d e l f o r the generation of water waves is
based on the i n s t a b i l i t y of the i n t e r f a c e between the a i r f l o w and the
w a t e r . The t h e o r y of P h i l l i p s p r e d i c t s a r a t e of g r o w t h of the sea p r o -
p o r t i o n a l to t i m e , whereas a f t e r the i n s t a b i l i t y m e c h a n i s m of M i l e s takes
o v e r , the r a t e of g r o w t h becomes exponential. The P h i l l i p s m o d e l is an
uncoupled m o d e l i n the sense that e x c i t a t i o n ( a i r flow) is assumed to be
independent of response (sea m o t i o n ) . The M i l e s t h e o r y r e p r e s e n t s a
coupled m o d e l i n which the coupling can lead to i n s t a b i l i t y and consequent
r a p i d g r o w t h . T h e r e can be l i t t l e doubt that both m e c h a n i s m s occur m
any p r a c t i c a l s i t u a t i o n . A t some frequencies i n the s p e c t r u m the uncoupled
m o d e l w i l l govern and at others the i n s t a b i l i t y m o d e l w i l l govern. The
w o r k of M i l e s (I960) is a recognized c o n t r i b u t i o n on wave generation
theory.
I j i m a (1957) presented an exceltent paper on the p r o p e r t i e s of
ocean waves f o r tljie .Japanese area of i n t e r e s t . T h i s study included valuable
i n f o r m a t i o n on wave spectra obtained under typhoon conditions. A l s o a
decided d i f f e r e n c e existed between wave spectra obtained on the open
P a c i f i c Coast and that obtained f o r the coast of the Sea of Japan.

Another i m p o r t a n t e f f o r t f o r obtaining wave spectra was that c o n -

ducted by m e m b e r s of the New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y : Chase, Cote, M a r k s ,
M e h r . P i e r s o n , Ronne, Stephenson, V e t t e r and Walden (1957). A U
e m b a r k e d upon a great task of obtaining the f i r s t d i r e c t i o n a l s p e c t r u m of
a w i n d - g e n e r a t e d sea by stereophotographic techniques, although W e m b l u m
and B l o c k (1936), about 20 y e a r s e a r l i e r , c a r r i e d out m e a s u r e m e n t s
e n t a i l i n g s t e r e o p h o t o g r a m m e t r i c r e p r o d u c t i o n of ocean waves on b o a r d the
m o t o r ship SAN F R A N C I S C O .

S u l k e i k i n (1959) presented the Russian methods of f o r e c a s t i n g

w i n d waves over w a t e r , w h i c h f o l l o w e d f r o m h i s e a r l i e r w o r k s on the
t h e o r y of sea waves (1956). B u r l i n g (1959) presented a s p e c t r u m of waves
at short fetches and found a range i n values of m i n the h i g h f r e q u e n c y
f ' " ^ of the wave s p e c t r u m . K n r v i n - K r o u k o v s k v (1961), i n his T h e o r y of
Seakeeping, s u m m a r i z e s m u c h of the e a r l y w o r k on w i n d wave generation.

11
I n p a r t i c u l a r , t h i s book includes a v e r y conaprehensive b i b l i o g r a p h y on
waves and.wave t h e o r y .
I n 1961 an I n t e r n a t i o n a l Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra was
held at Easton, M a r y l a n d , the proceedings of which were published iri
1963.* T h i s conference included about 30 presentations, plus d i s c u s s i o n s ,
and had an attendance of less than 100 p a r t i c i p a n t s , r e p r e s e n t i n g a v e r y
l a r g e percentage of the scientists and engineers i n the w o r l d who have
been c o n t r i b u t i n g to the advancement of the science of ocean wave spectra.
It can be said that t h i s conference brought the "state of the a r t " up to date.
Known and unknown p r o p e r t i e s of the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m of a w i n d -
generated sea, by P i e r s o n and Neumann (1961, 1963) was the m o s t l o g i c a l
paper to lead off the p r o g r a m . Unless one understands the concept of a
f u l l y developed sea, the w o r k of Walden (1961, 1963) m i g h t be m i s i n t e r -
p r e t e d since his data w e r e f o r v e r y short e f f e c t i v e fetches. f^°w®7f^'
t h i s d i f f i c u l t y was c l a r i f i e d i n the d i s c u s s i o n of B r e t s c h n e i d e r ( 1961, 1963).
Numerous discussions f o l l o w e d and the p r o g r a m continued w e l l on i t s way
throughout the f o u r - d a y p e r i o d . The conference produced two sources of
d i r e c t i o n a l s p e c t r u m : L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s , C a r t w r i g h t and Smith (196iL, 1963)
and M u n k (1961,1963). On the last day, w i t h heads s t i l l spinning, i t
became an accepted f a c t that the o n e - d i m e n s i o n a l l i n e a r concepts w e r e
not always s u f f i c i e n t to d e s c r i b e the state of the sea.

However, the conference was not intended to b r i n g f o r t h new t h e o r y

on how waves f o r m when wind blows ever the w a t e r , except f o r d i s c u s s i o n
of the w o r k of P h i l l i p s (1957) and M i l e s (1957), and an i n t r o d u c t i o n "On
the N o n l i n e a r E n e r g y T r a n s f e r i n a Wave S p e c t r u m " by Hasselmann
(1961, 1963). O t h e r w i s e the t h e o r y was l i m i t e d to that r e q u i r e d f o r data
c o l l e c t i o n , data r e d u c t i o n and a n a l y s i s , and data p r e s e n t a t i o n and a p p l i -
cations. The w o r k of Hasselmann (1961,1963) is indeed a c l a s s i c a l
c o n t r i b u t i o n , but i t s t i l l does not t e l l us why waves are f o r m e d a c c o r d i n g
to p r e - d e s c r i b e d elevations and f r e q u e n c i e s .

D u r i n g the f i n a l stages of development of a w i n d - g e n e r a t e d sea,

two nonlinear processes could become s i g n i f i c a n t . T h e r e is a d i s s i p a t i o n
of wave energy due to b r e a k i n g (whitecaps), and a t r a n s f e r of energy
f l u x between f r e q u e n c y bands m a y take place. The t h e o r y of Hasselmann
concerns the l a t t e r p r o c e s s . The t h e o r y shows that by the f i f t h o r d e r
i n t e r a c t i o n s energy can be t r a n s f e r r e d between f r e q u e n c y bands i n the
s p e c t r u m . I n f a c t , P h i l l i p s (I960 and 1961, 1963) has shown that t h i s
t h e o r e t i c a l energy t r a n s f e r can occur at c e r t a i n t h i r d o r d e r resonant
i n t e r a c t i o n s . So f a r s p e c t r a l energy t r a n s f e r is a p u r e l y theqre};ical c o n -
j e c t u r e and has not been v e r i f i e d by o b s e r v a t i o n or e x p e r i m e n t .

I n the f o l l o w i n g m a t e r i a l r e f e r e n c e s t o the above conference and

proceedings are shown by (1961, 1963),

12
 C a r t w r i g h t (1961) and P i e r s o n (1961) gave b r i e f r e p o r t s on the
papers presented at the 1961 conference, p r i o r to the p u b l i c a t i o n of the
proceedings.
A f t e r the conference was over, the p a r t i c i p a n t s went honne to
w o r k again, hoping to advance the state of the a r t . M o r e data w e r e to
be c o l l e c t e d , and this r e q u i r e d f u r t h e r development of i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n ,
and an advancement of s t a t i s t i c a l t h e o r y and computation p r o c e d u r e s .

A f t e r the conference s e v e r a l i m p o r t a n t papers appeared, although

they had p r o b a b l y been w o r k e d on f o r s e v e r a l y e a r s . These included a
paper by K o r n e v a (1961) on wave v a r i a b ü i t y w h i c h tended to v e r i f y the
p r e v i o u s l y mentioned p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n s ; a j o i n t paper on
"Data f o r H i g h Wave Conditions Observed by the OWS 'Weather R e p o r t e r '
i n December 1959" by B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C r u t c h e r , D a r b y s h i r e , Neumann,
P i e r s o n , Walden and W i l s o n (1962); and a paper by Schellenberger (1962)
on "undersuchungen uber W i n d w e l l e n auf l i n e m Binnensee. " P i e r s o n and
M o s k o w i t z (1963) c o n t r i b u t e d a new f o r m of the o n e - d i m e n s i o n a l wave
s p e c t r u m based on the s i m i l a r i t y t h e o r y of K i t a i g o r o d s k i (1961) and
found out that t h i s s p e c t r u m f e l l somewhere among the other past _
proposed spectra, c o n s i d e r i n g the i n h e r e n t e r r o r s a r i s i n g f r o m d i f f i -
c u l t i e s i n d e t e r m i n i n g and d e f i n i n g w i n d speeds.

Walden and P i e s t (1961) presented data and analysis on wave

spectra obtained near the M e l l u m P l a t e Lighthouse, located i n the s o m e -
what s h e l t e r e d water o f f the N o r t h Sea coast b f Germany,

A good s u m m a r y of wave t h e o r y and wave generation is presented

i n V o l u m e I of The Sea, edited by H i l l (1962), p a r t i c u l a r l y Chapter 19,
" W i n d Waves, " by B a r b e r and T u c k e r ( 1962),

Numerous data r e p o r t s on wave spectra are now becoming a v a i l a b l e .

For example, M o s k o w i t z , P i e r s o n and M e h r (1962, 1963) p r e p a r e d r e p o r t s
on wave spectra e s t i m a t e d f r o m wave r e c o r d s obtained by the OWS
"Weather R e p o r t e r I , I I and I I I " and the OWS "Weather E x p l o r e r , " and
P i c k e t t (1962) presented wave spectra f o r the A r g u s I s l a n d tower o f f
Bermuda,

B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1962) presented a concept on m o d i f i c a t i o n of wave

spectra over the continental shelf, and I j i m a (1962) presented an i n t e r e s t i n g
development of the c o r r e l a t i o n between wave heights and wave p e r i o d s f o r
shallow w a t e r , K i t a i g o r o d s k i and S t r e k a l o v (1962, 1963) presented c o n -
t r i b u t i o n s to an analysis of the spectra of wind wave m o t i o n based on_
e x p e r i m e n t a l data. T h i s w o r k was a continuation of the w o r k of K i t a i -
g o r o d s k i (1961),

Goodknight and R u s s e l l (1964) presented the f i r s t data on l a r g e

w i n d waves i n shallow water of the Gulf of M e x i c o , These waves w e r e
generated under h u r r i c a n e wind c o n d i t i o n s . The s t a t i s t i c a l analysis of
the data showed that, f o r a l l p r a c t i c a l purposes, the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n

13
was quite s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r r e p r e s e n t i n g wave height v a r i a b i l i t y f o r l a r g e
h u r r i c a n e waves i n shallow w a t e r . The d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave p e r i o d s d i d
not f o l l o w the d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n of B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1957) or that of
P u t z (1952) but f e l l somewhere between these d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n s and
the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n . The data seem to consist of long p e r i o d waves
a r r i v i n g f r o m deep water combined w i t h l o c a l w i n d waves generated at
a l a r g e angle to the s w e l l s .

Hamada (1963, 1964) presented two v e r y i n t e r e s t i n g r e p o r t s based

on l a b o r a t o r y e x p e r i m e n t s of wind wave generation. The law
o r i g i n a l l y proposed by P h i l l i p s (1957) was stated to be applicable to the
l i m i t i n g boundary of the i n s t a b i l i t y . F o r v e r y s h o r t fetches and h i g h w i n d
speeds, Hamada (1964) f i n d s the high f r e q u e n c y r e l a t i o n s of f " " and
£-8,94_

A c c o r d i n g to the w o r k of B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959), the h i g h f r e q u e n c y

energy v a r i e s w i t h f""" where m = 9 f o r v e r y low gF^/U , and
decreases i n magnitude to m = 5 f o r v e r y l a r g e g F / U , c o r r e s p o n d i n g
to f u l l y developed seas. Thus there is agreement at i n i t i a l wave genera-
t i o n f o r f""^ between Hamada (1963) and B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959), and also
agreement at f u l l y developed wave generation f"^ among P h i l l i p s (1957),
B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959), P i e r son (1963), and Hamada (1964). T h e r e are
s t i l l e f f o r t s r e q u i r e d f o r the exponential p a r t of the s p e c t r a l equation,

ie e'-^^''^ where B i s a constant. A c c o r d i n g to B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959)

and P i e r s o n (1963), n = 4 , but the f a c t o r B i s s t i l l i n some d i s a g r e e -
m e n t . The w o r k of B u r l i n g (1959) indicates that n m i g h t be l a r g e r than
n = 4. B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1961, 1963) states that n m i g h t v a r y between 4
and 8 or 9.
To date, a l l t h e o r i e s are u s e f u l i n a t t e m p t i n g to understand the
m e c h a n i s m s i n v o l v e d i n the generation of waves. None of the theories_
t e l l s us why waves are f o r m e d , let alone why the wave heights and p e r i o d s
are as observed or why t h e r e is a s p e c t r u m of waves. H o w e v e r , t h e r e
i s enough i n f o r m a t i o n to f o r m u l a t e v a r i o u s e m p i r i c a l wave f o r e c a s t i n g
r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r c e r t a i n p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n s . The accuracy of such
wave f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s depends on the a c c u r a c y of the w i n d and
wave data c o l l e c t e d and used f o r the e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s . The
a c c u r a c y of the wave f o r e c a s t s then also depends upon the a c c u r a c v
of the wind f o r e c a s t s .

14
 A t t h i s point of the d i s c u s s i o n i t appears i n o r d e r to i n t r o d u c e
an equation w h i c h d e s c r i b e s the sea state wave s p e c t r u m , i n c l u d i n g the
v a r i a b i l i t y of wave d i r e c t i o n . The equation can be w r i t t e n as f o l l o w s :

mt , • oo
CO t e - 1
TT (k,CO ) c o s ^
mt

(14)

CO U COS ^
- 1 dT

where
CJu,,, cos
CJ ^
m = g

I n E q . (14) TT ( k , ) i s the t h r e e - d i m e n s i o n a l p r e s s u r e s p e c t r u m as a
f u n c t i o n of the v e c t o r wave number k and t i m e T ; U is the convection
v e l o c i t y of the p r e s s u r e s y s t e m s , and u>;< is the f r i c t i o n v e l o c i t y of the
shear f l o w . /Ö is the c o e f f i c i e n t calculated by M i l e s ( I 9 6 0 ) , and
and 7 ° are water and a i r densities r e s p e c t i v e l y .

T h e r e i s l i t t l e need to extend the above r e v i e w any f u r t h e r since

the d i r e c t i o n a l s p e c t r u m has been discussed quite adequately by T u c k e r
(1964). I t i s hoped that m o s t of the i m p o r t a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n s on wave gen-
e r a t i o n have been mentioned. E q . (14) r e p r e s e n t s the p r e s e n t state of
the a r t on wave s p e c t r u m generation t h e o r y , but a d d i t i o n a l e m p i r i c a l
data are r e q u i r e d .

I n r e g a r d to p r a c t i c a l methods f o r wave hindcasting, B r e t s c h n e i d e r

(1964) presented a paper w h i c h takes into account the complete p r o b l e m of
deep water waves, s t o r m surge and waves over the continental shelf,
the b r e a k i n g wave zone, the wave r u n - u p on the beach and dunes f o r the
M a r c h 5-8, 1962, East Coast S t o r m . T h i s paper shows the r e s u l t s
based on present methods of wave hindcasting and also emphasizes the
areas of need f o r f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h . A v e r y i m p o r t a n t c o n s i d e r a t i o n of
w i n d wave generation over the shallow water of the continental shelf is
that of the t o t a l water depth. The t o t a l water depth includes the combined
e f f e c t of o r d i n a r y tide and s t o r m surge, The v a r i o u s p r o b l e m s of w i n d
set-up and s t o r m surge have been discussed by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1958). No
f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n on tides and s t o r m surge is given here since the sub-
jects were w e l l discussed by v a r i o u s l e c t u r e r s at L u n t e r e n , e. g. D r s ,
J. R. R o s s i t e r , W, Hansen, P , Groen, J. T h . T h i j s s e , and J. C.
Shonfeld. A d d i t i o n a l w o r k on s t o r m surge p r o b l e m s is planned f o r
subsequent r e p o r t s .

15
II. P R A C T I C A L APPLICATIONS - - DEEP WATER

A. SIGNIFICANT W A V E CONCEPT

The s i g n i f i c a n t wave naethod of wave f o r e c a s t i n g was that

o r i g i n a l l y i n t r o d u c e d by Sverdrup and M u n k (1947) and is s o m e t i m e s
considered the "ancient" m e t h o d . The wave f o r e c a s t i n g p a r a m e t e r s
presented by t h e m evolved f r o m t h e o r e t i c a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , but the
actual r e l a t i o n s h i p s r e q u i r e d c e r t a i n basic data f o r the d e t e r m i n a t i o n of
v a r i o u s constants and c o e f f i c i e n t s . Hence, this method can be c a l l e d
s e m i - t h e o r e t i c a l or s e m i - e m p i r i c a l .

The s i g n i f i c a n t wave m e t h o d entails c e r t a i n d e f i n i t i o n s . The s i g -

n i f i c a n t wave height is the m e a n or average wave height of the highest
1/ 3 of a l l the waves p r e s e n t i n a given wave t r a i n . The s i g n i f i c a n t wave
p e r i o d r e p r e s e n t s the m e a n p e r i o d of the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height. I t
was found f r o m the analysis of wave r e c o r d s that the s i g n i f i c a n t height
is n e a r l y equal to that height r e p o r t e d f r o m v i s u a l o b s e r v a t i o n s , and f o r
t h i s reason there was s o m e t i m e s a c e r t a i n amount of agreement between
v a r i o u s e m p i r i c a l f o r m u l a s used p r i o r to the development of the t h e o r y .

I t m i g h t be m e n t i o n e d that the s i g n i f i c a n t wave p e r i o d r e p r e s e n t s

a p e r i o d around which is concentrated the m a x i m u m wave energy. F r o m
the w o r k of P u t z (1952), L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s (1952), and B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959),
the d i s t r i b u t i o n of the v a r i o u s wave heights can be d e t e r m i n e d by use of
the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height.

The wave p a r a m e t e r s obtained f r o m the t h e o r e t i c a l w o r k of

S v e r d r u p and M u n k (1947) can also be obtained f r o m d i m e n s i o n a l c o n -
s i d e r a t i o n s . T h i s has been done by Johnson (1950), among o t h e r s ,
u t i l i z i n g the Buckingham P i - t h e o r e m (1914).

The f a c t o r s on w h i c h the w i n d wave p a r a m e t e r s f o r deep water

depend are the wind v e l o c i t y U, the f e t c h length F , and the wind
d u r a t i o n t . Of the wave p a r a m e t e r s only wave height and wave p e r i o d
need to be c o n s i d e r e d since, i n deep w a t e r , the wave length L -
(g/2TT)T2 and the wave c e l e r i t y C = (g/2TT)T. The waves w i l l s u r e l y
be subject to the i n f l u e n c e of g r a v i t y and then i t m a y be supposed that:

C = f ^ ( U , F , t , g) (15)

and

H = f^ (U, F , t , g) (16)

17
Eqs. (15) and (16) state that C and H r e s p e c t i v e l y are f u n c t i o n s
f J and f^ of U , F , t, g, but apply f o r deep w a t e r only. *

F r o m the symbols appearing i n Eqs. (15) and (16) one m a y w r i t e

the dimensions f o r deep w a t e r as f o l l o w s ;

Symbol Dimensions

H L

F L

t T

g
A d d i t i o n a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s can be w r i t t e n i f the w a t e r depth is taken into
account.
F o r each of the above equations there are f i v e v a r i a b l e s and two
d i m e n s i o n a l u n i t s , whence f r o m the B u c k i n g h a m P i - t h e o r e m the solutions
w i l l each be f u n c t i o n s of 5 - Z = 3 d i m e n s i o n l e s s p r o d u c t s , w i t h 2 + 1 = 3
v a r i a b l e s to each p r o d u c t . I n respect to E q . (15) one can w r i t e

O = F J (CU^g^), (FU^g"^)., tU^g^) (17)

W i t h r e s p e c t to equation (17) one obtains the dimensions

1 r a . -,b

and 1 r e
T
T
LT^J

* I f one considers wave generation i n shallow w a t e r , Eqs. (15) and (16)

become
C = f j (U, F , t , d , g ) (15a)

and
H = f^ (U, F , t , d , g) (16a)

where d i s the water depth.

18
 Equating to unity the sum of the exponents f o r the c o r r e s p o n d i n g
d i m e n s i o n s , one obtains the f o l l o w i n g equations:

1 + a +b = 0
1 - a - 2b = 0
1 + c + d = 0
• c - 2d = 0
e + f = 0
1 - e - 2f = 0

The simultaneous s o l u t i o n of the above r e s u l t s i n

a = -1 d - 1
b = 0 e = -1
c = -2 f = 1

Using values of the above exponents, E q . (17) becomes

c'
O - F . u 1^11
\ 1
(18)
or

I n a s i m i l a r manner the c o r r e s p o n d i n g e x p r e s s i o n f r o m E q . (16)

becomes
J l (19)
u

I t m i g h t be m e n t i o n e d that the P i - t h e o r e m is a m o s t p o w e r f u l
t o o l i f p r o p e r l y used. I t i s e x t r e m e l y i m p o r t a n t to r e a l i z e that the
expressions f o r p h y s i c a l f a c t m u s t be d i m e n s i o n a l l y homogeneous; o t h e r -
wise t h e r e are some s c i e n t i f i c f a c t o r s m i s s i n g .

Equations (18) and (19) r e p r e s e n t the wave generation p a r a m e t e r s

f o r deep w a t e r , based on d i m e n s i o n a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , and y/ ^
are f u n c t i o n a l r e l a t i o n s that m u s t be d e t e r m i n e d by use of wave data.
g H / U ^ , C / U , g F / U ^ and g t / U are d e f i n e d r e s p e c t i v e l y as the wave
height p a r a m e t e r , the wave speed p a r a m e t e r , the f e t c h p a r a m e t e r , and
the w i n d d u r a t i o n p a r a m e t e r . The wave speed p a r a m e t e r can also be
written ^ , w h i c h is a better f o r m because the wave p e r i o d is m o r e
e a s i l y m e a s u r e d than the wave speed.

19
 Using the above p a r a m e t e r s B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1951) r e v i s e d the
o r i g i n a l f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s of Sverdrup and M u n k (1947), u t i U z i n g
m u c h a d d i t i o n a l wave data. B e f o r e 1951, however, A r t h u r (1947) also
r e v i s e d the same r e l a t i o n s , but d i d not have the data that w e r e available
i n 1951. F u r t h e r r e v i s i o n s of these r e l a t i o n s h i p s w e r e made again by
B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1958). These f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s have a c q u i r e d
the name S - M - B method f o r Sverdrup, M u n k and B r e t s c h n e i d e r ,

The f i n a l f o r m of the d i m e n s i o n l e s s wave generation p a r a m e t e r s

appears i n f i g u r e 3.
The c u r v e t U / F is the r e l a t i o n s h i p between w i n d speed, m i n i -
m u m d u r a t i o n and f e t c h length, and was d e t e r m i n e d by n u m e r i c a l i n t e -
g r a t i o n of the f o l l o w i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s :

gt f U r gF \ , _ C g ^ _ L ^

(20)
tU _ gt gF
— - U • ^2

Wave f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s given i n F i g u r e 4 are based on the d i m e n -

sionless p a r a m e t e r s of f i g u r e 3.
F o r long n a r r o w bodies of water such as m a n - m a d e r e s e r v o i r s ,
r i v e r s , canals, or n a r r o w i n l e t s , c o r r e c t i o n s need to be made f o r the
f e t c h length. F i g u r e 5, based cn the w o r k of Saville (1954), can be used
to calculate an e f f e c t i v e f e t c h length, based on actual f e t c h length and
f e t c h w i d t h . The e f f e c t i v e f e t c h length F ^ 5 F ^ - ^ should be used
w i t h F i g u r e 4 to d e t e r m i n e s i g n i f i c a n t waves f o r long n a r r o w bodies of
water.

B. C O M P L E X N A T U R E OF SEA SURFACE

The s i g n i f i c a n t wave d e s c r i p t i o n i s a s i m p l e and p r a c t i c a l means

of dealing w i t h p r o b l e m s in wave f o r e c a s t i n g . H o w e v e r , i t i s i m p o r t a n t
to recognize that the sea is v e r y complex, made up of many v a r i a b l e
heights and p e r i o d s . F i g u r e 6 shows a schematic i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of a
t y p i c a l wave r e c o r d w h i c h m i g h t be obtained f r o m a wave r e c o r d e r . The
s i g n i f i c a n t wave height i s the average of the highest 1/3 of the waves m a
given wave t r a i n , of at least 100 consecutive waves, and is t h e r e f o r e a
s t a t i s t i c a l p a r a m e t e r . The s i g n i f i c a n t wave p e r i o d i s the average p e r i o d
of the highest 1/3 of the wave heights, and is c o m m o n only to the S - M - B
f o r e c a s t i n g m e t h o d . The P i e r son-Neumann-James ( P - N - J ) f o r e c a s t i n g
method considers a m e a n apparent wave p e r i o d and ranges m wave p e r i o d .
Both S - M - B and P - N - J consider the p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave
heights and i n both methods the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n i s used. The S - M - B

20
FIGURE 3 FETCH GRAPH FOR DEEP WATER
FIGURE 4 DEEP WATER WAVE FORECASTING CURVES
AS A F U N C T I O N OF WIND S P E E D ,
FETCH L E N G T H , AND WIND D U R A T I O N
( FOR TFTCHP?; I rn i oor» n'it <t>
 WIND EFFECTIVE 0 V {: R ONLY 90°
OF FETCH•• i.e. 45° ElT H E R SIDE
OF WIND DIRECTION^

WIND EFFECTIVE OVER ONLY 60°

1.0 OF FETCH: i.e. 30° EITHER SIDE
OF WIND DIRECTION. - V

0.9

w 0.8

<-
0.7

0.6
«

// - WIND EFFECTIVE OVER ENTIRE 180°

OF FETCH : i.e. 90° EITHER SIDE

/ //
// OF WIND DIRECTION.

£ 0.4
^ y ^^CHANGE IN HORIZONTAL
SCALE
0.3
// DASHED LINES INDICATE WIND CONSIDERED EQUALLY EFFECTIVE

/' OVER EACH (EQUAL SIZED) SEGMENT OF FETCH.

f
0.2
FULL LINES INDICATE WIND EFFECTIVENESS CONSIDERED TO VARY
0.1 AS THt COSINt OP I Hh I-XNüLfc WIND COMPONtN r CONS I D E R E D .
r -
1
O
0 0.1 02 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 L5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
RATIO . OF FETCH WIDTH TO LENGTH ^

FIGURE 5 RELATION OF EFFECTIVE FETCH TO

WIDTH-LENGTH RATIO FOR RECTANGULAR FETCHES
 O
O
I
UJ

UJ CO
a.
ü </)
O
t¬
I <
X
O O
O 3
O
I cc
UJ

s a ir
to O
z
O
V) OX O
</) LJ
O
o: O QSL
O CC
O. I ¬
n I Lü
I O
O h¬
o: I
UJ

UI
UJ O.
I O
O
UI
UJ cc CO
cr O
D O
O
X
i»7 Q: cr H
UJ
ü. UI
O.
UJ
3 O
_i

CD

UJ
ID
CS

24
m e t h o d uses a p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n also f o r wave p e r i o d . W i l s o n
(1955) i n t r o d u c e d t h é s p a c e - t i m e concept f o r f o r e c a s t i n g waves m m o v i n g
fetches and i n 1963 extended the w o r k f o r use on a h i g h speed c o m p u t e r .
F i g u r e 7 is r e p r o d u c e d f r o m W i l s o n (1955),

D r a p e r and D a r b y s h i r e (1963) presented r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r f o r e -

casting m a x i m u m wave heights. F i g u r e s 8, 9, 10 and 11 are r e p r o d u c e d
f r o m D r a p e r and D a r b y s h i r e (1963) where i t should be kept i n m m d that
the m a x i m u m wave is equal to 1. 6 t i m e s the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height.
F i g u r e s 8 and 10 are f o r deep w a t e r and F i g u r e s 9 and 11 are f o r
coastal w a t e r s .

1. Wave V a r i a b i l i t y
a. S i g n i f i c a n t Wave H e i g h t . The s i g n i f i c a n t wave height,
as mentioned above, is a t e r m c o m m o n to both the S - M - B and P - N - J
methods of wave f o r e c a s t i n g . Just how the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height i s
r e l a t e d to the p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n and also the wave s p e c t r u m can
best be i l l u s t r a t e d by f i g u r e s 12 and 13. F i g u r e 12 shows the d i s t r i b u -
t i o n of wave heights as v i s u a l i z e d by a h i s t o g r a p h , i . e. the number N
(or percent P of the t o t a l number) of waves i n each wave height range.
F i g u r e 13 i s a schematic d i a g r a m of the wave s p e c t r u m and m t h i s f o r m
i s c a l l e d the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m .

b D i s t r i b u t i o n of Wave Heights. The s i g n i f i c a n t wave

height i s a s t a t i s t i c a l p a r a m e t e r , and about i b or 17 p e r c e n t of the waves
w i l l be h i g h e r than the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height. I t is shown by Longuet-
Higgins (1952), W a t t e r s (1953), K r y l o v (1956 and 1958), and D a r l i n g t o n
(1954) and v e r i f i e d by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959) that the d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave
heights f o r a n a r r o w s p e c t r u m i s given by the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n . The
p r o b a b i l i t y density f o r wave heights i s given by:
. TT H_ ^
p (H) dH = S- e dH (21)

and the c u m u l a t i v e d i s t r i b u t i o n is 'H^2

TT

P (H) = 1 - e H (22)

where H is the i n d i v i d u a l wave height and H i s the average wave height.

The average wave height ïï , the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height H ^ j ,

and the average of the highest ten percent of the waves H ^ Q , are r e l a t e d
as f o l l o w s :

25
 9Z

00 g
m
m
O
— O
O
I

* i
O /AVE HE I G H T - H-(FE ET)

-n
ETCH -

1
z
\UTICAl.
MILE:

I
c
:^
z
O

WIND VELOCITY (KNOTS)

-J

Duration in Hours

Maximum V/avo Height /n feet

4 i

FETCH, NAUTICAL MILES

(AFTER DRAPER AND DARBYSHIRE 1963)

GRAPH RELATING WAVE HEIGHT

FIGURE 8
TO WIND SPEED AND DURATION,
AND TO FETCH; FOR COASTAL WATERS
 Ourfltion in Hours

Maximum W a « Height In Feet

40 50
FETCH. NAUTICAL MILES ^ ^^^^^ oARBVSH.RE

GRAPH RELATING WAVE HEIGHT

FIGURE 9
TO WIND SPEED AND DURATION,
AND TO FETCH: TOP a . . ^ - ' -
 FETCH, NAUTICAL MILES
(AFTER DRAPER AND DARBYSHIRE 1963)
FIGURE 10 GRAPH RELATING
WAVE PERIOD TO WIND SPEED
AND DURATION, AND TO
FETCH; FOR OCEANIC WATERS

FETCH, NAUTICAL MILES

(AFTER DRAPER AND DARBYSHIRE 1963)

FIGURE M GRAPH RELATING

WAVE PERIOD TO WIND SPEED
AND D U R A T I O N , A N D TO
FETCH; FOR, COASTAL WATERS
 MOST PROBABLE H

•MEAN H

H P=33.3 PERCENT

FIGURE 12 . STATISTICAL
DISTRIBUTION OF HEIGHTS

| > - 2 . ^ SIGNIFICANT PERIOD

FIGURE 13 PERIOD SPECTRUM

30
 H = .625 H
33
(23)
= 2. 03 H = 1. 27

The c u m u l a t i v e d i s t r i b u t i o n P(H) is given i n F i g u r e 14,

c. D i s t r i b u t i o n of Wave P e r i o d s . The s i g n i f i c a n t wave

p e r i o d i s not a s t a t i s t i c a l p a r a m e t e r of the wave p e r i o d d i s t r i b u t i o n funC'
t i o n . The s i g n i f i c a n t wave p e r i o d has s t a t i s t i c a l significance only when
both wave heights and wave periods are c o n s i d e r e d . Putz (1952) obtains
a G a m m a - t y p e d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n f o r wave p e r i o d v a r i a b i l i t y , K r y l o v
(1956 and 1958) postulates the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n also f o r the wave
lengths, and B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959) shows that the d i s t r i b u t i o n of the
square of the wave p e r i o d s ( p r o p o r t i o n a l to the deep water wave lengths)
can be r e p r e s e n t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y by the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n , a t r a n s -
f o r m a t i o n of w h i c h leads to the f o l l o w i n g d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n f o r wave
periods:

3 -0,675'-'
p (T) dT = 2.7 ^ e dT (24)

and the c u m u l a t i v e d i s t r i b u t i o n is

-0.675 ^
P (T) 1 - e IT (25)

The c u m u l a t i v e d i s t r i b u t i o n P ( T ) i s also given i n F i g u r e 14. K o r n e v a

(1961) gives r e s u l t s w h i c h v e r i f y the p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n s of
wave height and p e r i o d .

d. The W e i b u l l D i s t r i b u t i o n F u n c t i o n . I n m a n y cases i t
m a y be d e s i r a b l e to r e p r e s e n t e m p i r i c a l data by means of a s i m p l e
d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n . W e i b u l l (1951) proposes a simple a n a l y t i c a l
d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n f o r use i n c e r t a i n c i v i l engineering p r o b l e m s as
follows:

(26)

where P i s the c u m u l a t i v e d i s t r i b u t i o n

B and m are constants

X ^ 0 is the v a r i a t e , i . e. H , L , or T as the case m a y be,

The p r o b a b i l i t y density i s given by

31
 Percent accumulative

FIGURE 14 DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS FOR PERIOD

 .m
(27

I t can be seen that when m = 2, the W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n i s the

same as the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n ( E q . 21 or 22) and when m = 4 the
W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n is the same as E q . 24 or 25. Thus the
W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n m i g h t be suitable f o r i n v e s t i g a t i n g wave
v a r i a b i l i t y when the data deviate somewhat f r o m the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n .

The m o m e n t s can be generated f r o m

ü
1+Ü
— I
m = p (X) dX (28)
n m m

where P r e p r e s e n t s the Gamma f u n c t i o n .

If the t e r m s of E q . (26) a r e r e a r r a n g e d and the l o g a r i t h m i s taken

t w i c e , one obtains

in in i n B +m i n X (29)

E q . (29) is that of a s t r a i g h t l i n e . When i n i n y ^ p " :-plotted against

i n X , the i n t e r c e p t becomes i n B and the slope óf the l i n e i s given by
m . P is the c u m u l a t i v e p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n , c a l c u l a t e d f r o m the
data and B i s r e l a t e d to the m e a n wave height or m e a n wave p e r i o d as
the case m a y be.
— ~2
F r o m E q . (28), m ^ = 0 , m ^ = X , := X , etc. I t then
f o l l o w s that
m
X s H = T = 1 + — (30)
m
or m
1 + ^
m
B
X

Thus Eqs. (26) and (27) become

P = 1 _x - (31)

33
 m-1 1 m
2£ r 1+ m
P (X) =: m 2L r 1 _1_ X (32)
X m X

By use of E q , ( 3 i ) , E q , (29) becomes

in in m in r(i + A ) + m i n (33)
1 - P m /
I t m u s t be emphasized that the W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n should be used
only where the t r e n d of the data shows a n e a r l y lineair r e l a t i o n s h i p a c c o r d -
ing to Eq, (29) or E q . (33), I f such a l i n e a r r e l a t i o n s h i p becomes apparent
f r o m the data, then a g r a p h i c a l s o l u t i o n i s possible, and a m o r e accurate
solution can be obtained by the s t a t i s t i c a l method of least squares.
A l t h o u g h the W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n has no t h e o r e t i c a l b a s i s , the f u n c t i o n
does have a wide range f o r p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n s . F o r example. F i g u r e s
15 and 16 r e p r e s e n t an analysis of wave data a c c o r d i n g to the W e i b u l l
d i s t r i b u t i o n . These data a r e based on long wave r e c o r d s obtained at
L a k e T e x o m a by U . S, A r m y engineers (1953) and are s u m m a r i z e d i n a
r e p o r t by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959). The s t r a i g h t l i n e s given i n F i g u r e s 15
and 16 w e r e f i t t e d v i s u a l l y , although a least squares f i t m i g h t have been
made to obtain better a c c u r a c y ,

e. Joint D i s t r i b u t i o h of Wave Heights and P e r i o d s . The

j o i n t d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave heights and p e r i o d s is quite c o m p l e x , except
f o r the special case of zero c o r r e l a t i o n between wave height and wave
p e r i o d . F i g u r e 17 is a scatter d i a g r a m of ï j = H / Ï T and A = T ^ / ( T ) ^
f o r a case v e r y n e a r l y zero c o r r e l a t i o n . I f the number of wave heights is
summed independently of the wave p e r i o d s , one obtains the m a r g i n a l
d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave heights, and i f the number of wave p e r i o d s squared
is summed independently of the wave heights, one obtains the m a r g i n a l
d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave p e r i o d s squared. Both of the above d i s t r i b u t i o n s
are r e p r e s e n t e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y by the Rayleigh d i s t r i b u t i o n . F o r the case
of zero c o r r e l a t i o n between wave height and wave p e r i o d , the j o i n t d i s t r i -
bution i s given d i r e c t l y by

p ( H , T ) = p (H) • p (T) (34)

Based on Eqs, (21), (24), and (34), the j o i n t pr_obability d i s t r i ¬

butions have been c a l c u l a t e d f o r v a r i o u s ranges of H / H and T / T and
are s u m m a r i z e d i n Table 1. T h i s table assumes zero c o r r e l a t i o n between
H and T ^ . Gumbel (I960) discusses the b i v a r i a t e exponential d i s t r i -
butions, t a k i n g into account c o r r e l a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s d i f f e r e n t f r o m zero,

Eq. (34) can be c o n s i d e r e d a p p r o x i m a t e l y c o r r e c t f o r p r a c t i c a l

engineering uses, except that the l i m i t of b r e a k i n g waves should always
be checked. The b r e a k i n g wave l i m i t i s given t h e o r e t i c a l l y by M i c h e
(1954) as f o l l o w s :

H_ 2-rrd (35)
tanh
L L

34
 3

« /
2
9

/a

In l n ( j r p ) = - C(.075+-J-In H
/ TH us: X 15
/ P= l" e VH Y
9 /

-2
• /

-3
-2.0 -1.0 0 I 2
In H

FIGURE 15 S A M P L E W E I B U L L DISTRIBUTION
DETERMINATION FOR WAVE HEIGHT
(DATA FROM U.S. ARMY ENGINEERS, 1953)

35
 3

2 /

O
In In ( T r p ) = - 3 . 3 5 + 3 . 4 In T
THUS!
PM-e-°.e3(i)-
//
/•

-2

-3

*/
-4

•/

- 2 - 1 0 1 2
In T

FIGURE 16 SAMPLE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

DETERMINATION FOR WAVE' PERIOD
(DATA FROM U.S. ARMY ENGINEERS, 1953)
36
 3.0 1 r

2.8

2.6

2.4

2.2 TL

2.0
e»
e
e «
ee

^ ..4
e •• • • •.Vv •
e •.:->v.
O 1.2
V|» .a
i.o
SI
«
.8 • • •
• e c:-.:: • • •
6
• • e « «fe
.4

. I V . < IZ
.2-
•« • e

.2 4
_L
.6 .8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
± 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
Relative Wave L e n g t h , X

FIGURE 17 SCATTER DIAGRAM OF V

AND A FOR 400 CONSECUTIVE
WAVES FROM THE GULF OF M E X I C O

37
 TABLE 1

JOINT D I S T R I B U T I O N O F H AND T F O R Z E R O C O R R E L A T I O N
Number of Waves P e r I , 000 Consecutive Waves for Various Ranges in Height and P e r i o d

Range in RANGE TN R E L A T I V E PERIOD T / T

Relative
Heig_ht 0- 0.2- 0.4- 0.6- 0.8- 1.0- 1.2- 1.4- 1.6- 1.8- 0- Cumula-
H/H 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.0 tive

O.-O. 2 0. 03 0. 50 2. 05 4. 86 7. 68 8. 09 5. 31 1. 92 0. 34 0. 03 30. 81 30. 81

0. 2-0. 4 0. 10 1. 41 5. 81 13.. 78 21. 76 23. 92 15. 05 5. 44 0. 98 0. 07 88. 32 119.13
0. 4-0. 6 0. 14 2. 06 8. 54 20. 23 31. 95 33. 65 22. 10 7. 99 1. 44 0. 11 128.21 247.34
0. 6-0. 8 0. 16 2. 40 9. 91 23. 48 37. 08 39. 06 25. 65 9. 27 1. 67 0. 12 148.80 396.14
0. 8-1. 0 0. 16 2. 40 9. 92 23. 51 37. 13 39. 11 25. 69 9. 28 1. 67 0. 12 148.99 545.13
1. 0-1. 2 0. 15 2. 14 8. 87 21. 02 33. 19 34. 97 22. 96 8. 30 1. 49 0. 11 133.20 678.33
1. 2-1. 4 0. 12 1. 74 7. 21 17. 07 26. 96 28. 40 18. 65 6. 74 1. 21 0. 09 108.19 786.52
1. 4-1. 6 0. 09 1. 30 5. 37 12. 72 20. 09 21. 16 13. 90 5. 02 0. 90 0. 07 80. 62 867.14
1. 6-1. 8 0. 06 0. 90 3. 72 8. 82 13. 93 14. 67 9- 64 3. 48 0. 63 0. 05 55. 90 923. 04
1. 8-2. 0 0. 03 0. 48 1. 99 4. 72 7. 45 7. 85 5. 15 1. 86 0. 33 0. 03 29- 89 952. 93
2. 0-2. 2 0. 03 0. 42 1. 72 4. 09 6. 45 6. 80 - -4, 47 1.61 0. 29 0. 02 25. 90 978. 83
2. 2-2. 4 0. 01 0. 18 0. 76 1. 80 2. 84 2. 99 1. 97 0.71 0. 13 0. 01 11. 40 990.23
2. 4-2. 6 0. 01 0. 09 0. 39 0. 93 1. 47 1. 55 1. 02 0. 37 0. 07 5. 90 996. 13
2. 6-2. 8 0. 04 0. 18 0 43 0. 67 0. 71 0. 47 0. 17 0. 03 2. 70 998.83

0-3. 0 1. 09 16. 06 66. 44 157. 46 248. 65 262. 93 172. 03 62. 16 11. 18 0. 83

Cumula-
tive 1.09 17.15 83.59 241.05 489.70 752.63 924.66 986.82 998.00 99& 83
w h e r e the l i m i t i n shallow water i s given by the s o l i t a r y wave t h e o r y

J L = 0.78 4 - (36)

Based i n p a r t on t h e o r y and i n p a r t on e m p i r i c a l data, B r e t s c h n e i d e r

(1960) p r e s e n t s a r e l a t i o n s h i p of the b r e a k i n g wave l i m i t w h i c h is as
follows:

4L = 0.124 tanh 1 + 0. 152 tanh (37)

Values of H and T obtained by use of T a b l e I should always be

checked by use of the above equations.

C. W A V E S P E C T R U M CONCEPTS

The o r i g i n a l wave s p e c t r u m concept f o r f o r e c a s t i n g waves is that

due to Neumann (1952). The wave s p e c t r u m m e t h o d r e s u l t i n g f r o m this
concept is that due to P i e r s o n , Neumann and James (1955). M u c h w o r k
has also been done w i t h r e g a r d to a wave s p e c t r u m m e t h o d by D a r b y s h i r e
(1952 and 1955). B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959) has added a wave s p e c t r u m
approach to the s i g n i f i c a n t wave m e t h o d . A m o r e r e c e n t s p e c t r u m concept
has been proposed by P i e r s o n (1964), the f o r m of w h i c h is i n agreement
w i t h that d e r i v e d by B r e t s c h n e i d e r ( 1959). Whereas the s i g n i f i c a n t wave
m e t h o d is c o m m o n l y c a l l e d the S - M - B method, the P i e r s o n , Neumann
and James method i s c o m m o n l y c a l l e d the P - N - J m e t h o d .

Just as the S - M - B m e t h o d i s based on e m p i r i c a l wave data, so i t

i s w i t h the P - N - J m e t h o d . As m e n t i o n e d b e f o r e , any suitable wave f o r e ¬
c a s t i n g method m u s t be c a l i b r a t e d by use of wave data. The P - N - J m e t h o d
can be used to p r e d i c t the s p e c t r u m of waves f r o m w h i c h one m a y obtain
the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height as w e l l as the s t a t i s t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of the
waves! The S - M - B m e t h o d i s used to p r e d i c t the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height,
f r o m w h i c h i t is possible to obtain the wave s p e c t r u m and the s t a t i s t i c a l
d i s t r i b u t i o n of the waves. Both methods u t i l i z e the d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n
d e r i v e d t h e o r e t i c a l l y by L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s (1952). T h i s d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n
i s i n v e r y close agreement w i t h the e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s given by
P u t z (1952) based on the analysis of 25 ocean wave r e c o r d s . Consequently,
when both S - M - B and P - N - J methods p r e d i c t exactly the same s i g n i f i c a n t
wave height, then the two methods r e s u l t i n exactly the same d i s t r i b u t i o n
of waves. I t m u s t be r e m e m b e r e d that both methods are based on actual
wave data. However, the wave data are not the same u t i l i z e d m the
two methods, and the m e t h o d of analysis of the data i s d i f f e r e n t . I t i e
analysis of the data f o r the S - M - B m e t h o d consists of d e t e r m i n i n g the
s i g n i f i c a n t wave height and p e r i o d , w h i c h i n t u r n are r e l a t e d to w i n d speed,
f e t c h length, and w i n d d u r a t i o n .

P r i o r to the development of the P - N - J m e t h o d , Neumann (1952)

p r o p o s e d a t h e o r e t i c a l wave s p e c t r u m based on a great abundance of

39
i n d i v i d u a l wave observations. T h i s s p e c t r u m should be c o n s i d e r e d as a
s e m i - t h e o r e t i c a l or s e m i - e m p i r i c a l s p e c t r u m i n the s t r i c t sense of the
d e f i n i t i o n . F r o m his wind and wave observations Neumann (1952) computed
the p a r a m e t e r s H/T and T / V , and a r r i v e d at the f o l l o w i n g r e l a t i o n ;

y - const e (3ö)

(See f i g u r e 18..) The p a r a m e t e r H / T i s d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d to the^wave

steepness and T / V the wave age. H i s the i n d i v i d u a l height. T i s the
i n d i v i d u a l wave p e r i o d , w h i c h he c a l l e d the apparent wave p e r i o d , d e f i n e d
as the t i m e between two successive u p - c r o s s i n g s of the S t i l l w a t e r s u r f a c e
by the wave f o r m .

F r o m t h i s e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p (Eq. 38) and other c o n s i d e r a t i o n s ,

Neumann (1952) d e r i v e d his t h e o r e t i c a l wave s p e c t r u m of energy. F r o m
these r e s u l t s he concluded f o r u n l i m i t e d f e t c h length and d u r a t i o n ( f u l l y
developed sea) that the wave height was equal to some constant t i m e s the
w i n d v e l o c i t y to the 5/2 power, and the energy at h i g h f r e q u e n c y was f
Because of the method of s o l u t i o n , a d i m e n s i o n a l constant was i n t r o d u c e d ,
but the equation has been evaluated by c o n s i d e r i n g that the t o t a l energy
under the curve of the s p e c t r u m was p r o p o r t i o n a l to the energy.XDJ-ithe equivalent
r o o t m e a n square wave height. The d i m e n s i o n a l constant has c r e a t e d
objections by v a r i o u s i n d i v i d u a l s i n the f i e l d of wave f o r e c a s t i n g , p a r t i c u -
l a r l y those who adhere to d i m e n s i o n a l homogeneity. However, i f one
accepts the r e l a t i o n s as e m p i r i c a l r a t h e r than t h e o r e t i c a l , then these
r e l a t i o n s ought to be suitable f o r wave f o r e c a s t i n g , at least over the range
of p a r a m e t e r s f r o m which the data w e r e analyzed. The i m p o r t a n t t h i n g
i n his development of the s p e c t r u m is the f a c t that t o t a l energy of the
s p e c t r u m i s c o r r e c t , a s s u m i n g that the w o r k of L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s is
c o r r e c t , and t h i s appears to be the case. The actual d i s t r i b u t i o n of the
energy w i t h r e s p e c t to wave p e r i o d or f r e q u e n c y m i g h t not be e x a c t l y
c o r r e c t , but perhaps is i n close agreement w i t h the actual data f r o m
w h i c h i t was d e r i v e d . Not u n t i l m u c h a d d i t i o n a l data become available
w i l l i t be possible to r e c o n c i l e any d i f f e r e n c e s between NeumannLs wave
s p e c t r u m and a m o r e c o r r e c t s p e c t r u m .

R o l l and F i s c h e r (1956) suggested a d i f f e r e n t d e r i v a t i o n of the

Neumann s p e c t r u m . I n t h i s d e r i v a t i o n there r e s u l t e d no d i m e n s i o n a l
constant, the wave height f o r f u l l y developed sea beca,me p r o p o r t i o n a l
2 -5
to U , and the energy at h i g h f r e q u e n c y was f

The concept of the wave s p e c t r u m i s c e r t a i n l y a great advance i n

t r y i n g to understand the n a t u r e of wave generation. I t i s shown, f o r
example, i n spite of the objections to the Neumann s p e c t r u m , that the
waives generate f r o m the high f r e q u e n c y end of the s p e c t r u m , and w i t h
t h i s concept Neumann (1952) d e r i v e d f r o m his s p e c t r u m r e l a t i o n s h i p s

40
i

FIGURE 18 RATIO OF WAVE HEIGHTS TO THE

SQUARE OF APPARENT WAVE PERIODS, % 2

41
f o r the s o - c a l l e d young or t r a n s i e n t state of sea. That i s , r e l a t i o n s c a l l e d
CO-cumulative power s p e c t r a are developed f r o m w h i c h i t is possible to
p r e d i c t E - v a l u e s , where E is r e l a t e d to the generated wave energy.

The t h e o r e t i c a l wave d i s t r i b u t i o n d e r i v e d by L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s
(1952) i s d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d to the E - v a l u e s , as t h i s c o n d i t i o n was u t i l i z e d
i n the development of the wave s p e c t r u m . The s i g n i f i c a n t wave height,
mean wave height, etc. are r e l a t e d to E as f o l l o w s :

H 1.772 fË,
ave
(39)
Hj/3 = 2.832 JT"

^ 1 / 1 0 - ^-600 . / E
T y p i c a l examples of wave f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s based upon the above:
concept are given i n F i g u r e s 19 and 20.

The s p e c t r u m proposed by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1959) was obtained by

use of a t h e o r e t i c a l f u n c t i o n f o r the j o i n t p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n of wave
heights and p e r i o d s . The p e r i o d s p e c t r u m was obtained as f o l l o w s :

H p ( H , T) dH (40)

where the i n t e g r a t i o n is over a l l wave heights as a f u n c t i o n of wave p e r i o d .

A s s u m i n g no c o r r e l a t i o n between H and T :

p(H,T) = p(H) • p(T) , whence (41)

p(T) ƒ H^p(H)dH - H^P(T) = ±.(H)^p(T) (42)

By use of E q , (24) one obtains the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m :

.3 -.675
3. 43 (H)^ (43)
(T)

F o r the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m :

T = 1
and dT = df
T

f r o m w h i c h the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m s becomes:
2
(H)' £-5 ^ - : 6 7 5 ( f T ) - ^ (44)
Sj,(f) - 3.43
(T)'

42
FIGURE 19 DURATION GRAPH
CO-CUMULATIVE SPECTRA FOR
WIND SPEEDS FROM 2 0 TO 3 6 KNOTS
AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION
43
 I I I I I I I
•OA .06 .08 .10 .26 f=J4
I I I I I I I I
28.0 ZOO 16.0 14.0 120 IQO 9.0 80
4.0 T
( H.0. PUB 6 0 3 , 1957)

FIGURE 20 FETCH GRAPH

CO-CUMULATIVE SPECTRA FOR
WIND S P E E D S FROM 2 0 TO 3 6 KNOTS
AS A F U N C T I O N OF FETCH
44
0

If one lets
625 gH33
gH _ (45)
U

and
(46)
2 TTU

i t then f o l l o w s that
675 27T Uf
gF. g (47)
Sj,(f) = 3.43 f-^e
(2rrFj'

F o r the h i g h f r e q u e n c y end of the s p e c t r u m S^(f) i s p r o p o r t i o n a l

to f " ^ T h i s is i n agreement w i t h the r e s u l t s of R o l l and F i s c h e r (1956)
and P h i l l i p s (1957) a ! w e l l as the n e w l y proposed s p e c t r u m of P i e r s o n and
M o s k o w i t z (1963).
Other f o r m s of the wave spectra have been suggested by B r e t -
schneider i n the Proceedings of the ConLerence on Ocean Wave Spectra^
(1963). The c o r r e s p o n d i n g T ^ T C T ^ Ï Ï H T r e q u e n c y s p e c t r a are as f o l l o w s .

S(T) = a T ^ e-^T^ (48)

or
•n
S(f) - a f - " ^ - ^ e-^^ (49)

F o r the W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n ( m = n - 1) one can propose

the f o l l o w i n g f o r m of wave spectra:
m+l - m •1
m (50)
S(f/g = (f/f„)""'"^e

where the peak of the s p e c t r u m occurs at f = f ^ . F o r the c u m u l a t i v e

f o r m the above equation becomes
ill+i ( f / f )-«^
m o (51)
S(f) = - E

where
E = S(f) df (52)
•'oo
P i e r s o n and M o s k o w i t z (1963), based on the s i m i l a r i t y t h e o r y of
K i t a i g o r o d s k i (1961) propose the f o l l o w i n g f o r m of wave spectra f o r a
f u l l y developed sea:

45
 S(CJ) dCO = (53)
CO

where

CO = 2TT£

COo ' .5

ai = 8. 1 X 10 -3

B = . 74

Uj^g g was the m e a s u r e d w i n d speed at 19. 5 m e t e r s above m e a n

sea l e v e l , and was used d i r e c t l y instead of m a k i n g an a d j u s t m e n t to the
standard anemometer l e v e l of 10 m e t e r s . T h i s was to avoid selecting
someone elses drag c o e f f i c i e n t . A c c o r d i n g to the Weather B u r e a u
c r i t e r i a , the wind speed over water at elevation 19. 5 m e t e r s is about
1. 1 t i m e s that at e l e v a t i o n 10 m e t e r s .

If E q . (53) i s i n t e g r a t e d to obtain the t o t a l energy and r e l a t e d to

the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height, one obtains

gH/uJg_5 = .21

or
gH/U^Q = 0.254

w h i c h is v e r y n e a r l y equal to g H / U ^ = . 26 used by Sverdrup and M u n k

(1947).
Eqs. (47) and (53) are d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d , any d i f f e r e n c e s r e s u l t i n g
only f r o m the e m p i r i c a l r e l a t i o n s f o r CO, 60^, and as f u n c t i o n s
of wind speed, and the c o r r e s p o n d i n g i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s of the w i n d speed,

D. FROUDE SCALING OF T H E WAVE SPECTRUM

A s s u m i n g that the Froude l a w applies f o r wave spectra, i t i s

possible to estimate design wave s p e c t r u m by the concept of F r o u d e
scaling. The design wave p a r a m e t e r , f o r example, the s i g n i f i c a n t wave
height, can be obtained f r o m the analysis of the c o m p i l e d wave s t a t i s t i c s
(wave s t a t i s t i c s can be c o m p i l e d by long t e r m m e a s u r e m e n t s or by use
of wave hindcasts). M e a s u r e d wave spectra are available f o r c e r t a i n
s t o r m c o n d i t i o n s , f o r example, B r e t s c h n e i d e r , et. a l . (1962). F o r t h e
design s t o r m , once i n 100 y e a r s , f o r example, the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height
can be c o n s i d e r a b l y l a r g e r than that c o r r e s p o n d i n g to a m e a s u r e d wave
spectrum.

46
 I n a r e p o r t by B r e t s c h n e i d e r and C o l l i n s (1964), the nnost severe
h u r r i c a n e w h i c h m i g h t occur i n the A t l a n t i c Ocean can generate a 62-foot
s i g n i f i c a n t wave height. The m e a s u r e d wave s p e c t r u m of B r e t s c h n e i d e r ,
et. a l . (1962), was used to estimate the c o r r e s p o n d i n g wave s p e c t r u m f o r
the 6 2 - f o o t s i g n i f i c a n t wave height. The f o l l o w i n g table gives s i g n i f i c a n t
wave heights based on f i v e m e a s u r e d wave spectra. F o r c o n v e r s i o n to
the 6 2 - f o o t s i g n i f i c a n t wave height the Froude length scale is obtained
from A = 62 (H measured) and the c o r r e s p o n d i n g t i m e scale i s

-r =jT.
Table I I
A = 62 -;- Hg
Date Time

17 Dec 1959 0600 35. 2 1. 76 1. 33

11 0900 34. 4 1. 80 1. 34
11 1500 33. 9 1. 83 1. 35
11 1800 39. 7 1. 56 1. 25

18 Dec 1959 OOOO 35. 3 1. 76 1. 33

To c o n v e r t the m e a s u r e d f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m to design s p e c t r u m ^ ^
the o r d i n a t e S(f) , having d i m e n s i o n f t ^ s e c , , m u s t be m u l t i p l i e d by A
and the abscissa f , having d i m e n s i o n s e c " ^ m u s t be m u l t i p l i e d by A

To c o n v e r t the c o r r e s p o n d i n g p e r i o d s p e c t r u m to design s p e c t r u m
the o r d i n a t e S(T), having d i m e n s i o n f t ^ s e c " \ m u s t be m u l t i p l i e d by
X •^''^ and the abscissa T , having d i m e n s i o n sec, m u s t be m u l t i p l i e d

by A
I f the design s i g n i f i c a n t wave w e r e d i f f e r e n t f r o m H = 62 feet, then
A and X would change a c c o r d i n g l y .

(Data tabulated by f r e q u e n c y analysis is o f t e n given f o r i n t e r v a l s

of A f- I n o r d e r to c o n v e r t such data to a design spectrurn^^one m u s t
make an a d d i t i o n a l c o n v e r s i o n by m u l t i p l y i n g A £ by A • )

F o r a number of reasons the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m has a m o r e p r a c t i c a l

a p p l i c a t i o n than the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m . A s i m p l e o p e r a t i o n c o n v e r t s the
f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m to the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m as f o l l o w s ;

S(T) dT = - S(f) df (54)

47
 where f = l/T

df = - 1/T^ dT

Thus

S(T) = f^S(f) (55)

F i g u r e Z l shows the F r o u d e scaling of the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m f o r

Hg = 6Z feet as given i n T a b l e I I , The Froude scaled spectra i n F i g u r e
Z l are shown s u p e r i m p o s e d on the t h e o r e t i c a l s p e c t r u m given by E q . (43)
The s i g n i f i c a n t v a r i a b i l i t y at some f r e q u e n c i e s is apparent. The theo-
r e t i c a l s p e c t r u m by E q . (43) can be considered as y i e l d i n g the mean
s p e c t r a l energy density i n any f r e q u e n c y band, but w i t h i n such a band an
i n d i v i d u a l ordinate w i l l v a r y a c c o r d i n g to some skew-type ' d i s t r i -
bution. The areas under a l l spectra given i n F i g u r e Z l are i d e n t i c a l and
a r e r e l a t e d to the same value of the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height, but only the
i n d i v i d u a l ordinates v a r y . F o r example, i f a given ordinate v a r i e s
a c c o r d i n g to the R a y l e i g h d i s t r i b u t i o n , then the upper and l o w e r 95%
confidence l e v e l s would be r e s p e c t i v e l y a l m o s t t w i c e and half of the
mean values.

In F i g u r e Z l the l a r g e i n s t a b i l i t i e s i n the scaled observed spectra

at l o w p e r i o d s (high f r e q u e n c i e s ) are not quite so apparent i n the frequenc
s p e c t r u m . These i n s t a b i l i t i e s are p r o b a b l y caused by the i n t r o d u c t i o n
of noise i n the o r i g i n a l r e c o r d , e i t h e r by sample rate or i n s t r u m e n t i n -
s e n s i t i v i t y , o r , m o s t l i k e l y a c o m b i n a t i o n of both. Since t h e r e is a
smoothing p r o c e s s ( r e l a t e d to A f) f o r the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m , i t
becomes apparent that a s i m i l a r smoothing process ( r e l a t e d to A T)
should also be applied to the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m . T h i s is because A T
is not l i n e a r l y r e l a t e d by a constant to l / A f - A d d i t i o n a l studies are
r e q u i r e d to i n v e s t i g a t e the d i s p a r i t y observed between spectra i n t e r m s
of A f and those i n t e r m s of ^ T .

48
 6f
SPECTRAL ENERGY DENSITY IN FT/^/SEC.

Ci
C

m
ro

o
O

Tl -D
O >

cn o •D
ro m
I o
o o
"Tl •n
O
O
m </)
m
o
cn o
o z
O D O

05
o S
> O
H
H
C
III. P R O P A G A T I O N OF WAVES A N D SWELLS I N T O
SHALLOW WATER

When waves or swells propagate into shallow w a t e r , a number of

m o d i f i c a t i o n s take place: r e f r a c t i o n , shoaling and energy l o s s e s . These
f a c t o r s w i l l be discussed subsequently, c o n s i d e r i n g only a s i m p l e s i n u -
soidal wave. The f a c t that waves t r a v e l i n groups of v a r i a b l e a m p l i t u d e
and f r e q u e n c i e s - - the wave s p e c t r u m - - entails additional c o n s i d e r a t i o n s
discussed l a t e r .

I f the waves are l o n g - c r e s t e d and a r e m o v i n g obliquely t o w a r d s a

s t r a i g h t s h o r e l i n e whose depth contours are also s t r a i g h t and p a r a l l e l to
the shore, those p o r t i o n s of the wave f r o n t which e f f e c t i v e l y f e e l b o t t o m
f i r s t are r e t a r d e d f i r s t ; t h e r e f o r e , the wave becomes subject to a p r o -
gressive c u r v i n g or r e f r a c t i o n w h i c h , i n i t s o v e r a l l e f f e c t , tends to a l i g n
the wave f r o n t to the depth c o n t o u r s . T h i s is i n analogy to simple l i g h t
rays of a p a r t i c u l a r wave length when t r a v e l i n g f r o m one m e d i a to a
m e d i a of d i f f e r e n t density. The l i g h t is bent or r e f r a c t e d . When a l l the
wave lengths f o r the s p e c t r u m of l i g h t t r a v e l f r o m one m e d i a to a m e d i a of
greater density, each wave length is r e f r a c t e d to a d i f f e r e n t degree, w h i c h
r e s u l t s i n s o r t i n g of the c o l o r s . S i m i l a r l y , when the s p e c t r u m of ocean
waves enters a r e f r a c t i n g a r e a , the d i f f e r e n t f r e q u e n c i e s or wave lengths
are sorted, and the r e s u l t i n g s p e c t r u m is changed a c c o r d i n g l y . F i g u r e
22 i l l u s t r a t e s the e f f e c t of r e f r a c t i o n f o r a s i m p l e wave.

The orthogonals (wa.ve rays) r e p r e s e n t the d i r e c t i o n that the wave

f r o n t s are t a k i n g . They become c u r v e d i n the p r o c e s s of r e f r a c t i o n and
i n general m a y tend to d i v e r g e cr converge. Over a submarine canyon
( F i g u r e 23) the waves w i l l always tend to diverge., and c o n v e r s e l y , over a
submarine r i d g e ( F i g u r e 24), the waves w i l l always tend to converge.

I t is g e n e r a l l y assumed that the wave energy contained between

orthogonals r e m a i n s constant as the wave f r o n t p r o g r e s s e s ; t h i s supposes
that there is no d i s p e r s i o n of energy l a t e r a l l y along the f r o n t , no
r e f l e c t i o n of energy f r o m the r i s i n g b o t t o m , and none l o s t by other
p r o c e s s e s . I f b^ r e p r e s e n t s the distance between orthogonals i n deep
w a t e r , and b the distance between orthogonals somewhere i n shallow
water (where the c o r r e s p o n d i n g wave heights are H
and H ) , since
O X
the energy of the wave is p i o p o r t i o n a l to the square of the wave height,
i t f o l l o w s that

bH^Cg = b H ^ C g (56)

or

H = H Ih Ih ' jcg /Cg '

X O v/ O X vy ®0 ^X

60
 COAST

FIGURE 2 2 REFRACTION EFFECT

51
FIGURE 23 DIVERGING ORTHOGONALS
52
 COAST

WAVE FRONTS
ORTHOGONALS
BOTTOM CONTOURS

FIGURE 24 CONVERGING ORTHOGONALS

53
where / b /b = K , the r e f r a c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t . The above is a
s i m p l i f i e d example and the general mechanics of t r a n s f o r m a t i o n f o r a
s i m p l e wave f o l l o w .

A s s u m i n g that the gradient of the sea bed is not so steep that

wave energy i s r e f l e c t e d , and that t h e r e is no gain or loss of energy due
to l a t e r a l d i f f r a c t i o n or d i s p e r s i o n , then the wave energy t r a n s m i t t e d
between orthogonals r e m a i n s the same, except f o r loss due to b o t t o m
f r i c t i o n and p e r c o l a t i o n i n the p e r m e a b l e bed. F r i c t i o n a l losses r e p r e s e n t
the energy expended i n o v e r c o m i n g r e s i s t a n c e , shea,r s t r e s s e s or d r a g
f o r c e s on the sea b o t t o m . P e r c o l a t i o n losses r e p r e s e n t energy l o s t
t h r o u g h actual i n f i l t r a t i o n of the wave m o t i o n into the s e m i - f l u i d m a s s of
c e r t a i n f i n e l y suspended sediments of the permeable sea. b o t t o m .

If P^ and Pp r e p r e s e n t the f r i c t i o n a l and p e r c o l a t i o n energy

losses per u n i t a r e a of b o t t o m per unit time^ r e s p e c t i v e l y ; then f r o m
F i g u r e 25, w h i c h shows the e l e m e n t a l length ^ x o£ r i s i n g sea b o t t o m
i n the d i r e c t i o n of m o t i o n , the energy loss ( t i m e r a t e ) , i n t e r m s of power
(P) t r a n s m i t t e d a c r o s s the v e r t i c a l section bh between the orthogonals
w i l l be:

(P^+PJb^x = [pb - ( 5 ( P b ) ] - Pb (58)

whence

d(Pb) _ _(p + p )b (59)

dx f ' p'

The wave energy E per unit s u r f a c e a r e a is given by

E = -1 / g H ^ (60)

w h i c h is t r a n s m i t t e d a c r o s s the unit a r e a w i t h the group v e l o c i t y

; i . e. C
ê
P = E C . The group v e l o c i t y changes f r o m deep water into shallow
ê
w a t e r a c c o r d i n g to

C - nC (61)
g
where C is the wave c e l e r i t y and n is the t r a n s m i s s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t
and, a c c o r d i n g to l i n e a r wave t h e o r y , is given by

1 1+ (62)
sinh 2 kh

where k 2 77/L, I t then f o l l o w s that the power of t r a n s m i s s i o n i s

Pb = Eb C = ƒ g b (nC) (63)

54
FIGURE 25 EXPERIMENTAL LENGTH B% OF
RISING SEA BOTTOM IN DIRECTION OF MOTION
 I n deep water, j u s t b e f o r e the waves are due to f e e l the e f f e c t s of
depth, E q . (63) becomes

Pb = ~ / ° g H ^ b n C (64)
OO ö y ° o c o c

The r a t i o of Eqs. (63) and (64) r e s u l t s i n

1/2 , 1/2
/ b \ ^ ' ^ i n C.
H o o (65)
H nC

w h i c h ma,y be expressed as

H = K K (66)
H~ r s fp

where K , K and are known as the r e f r a c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t , the

r ' s fp ,
shoaling c o e f f i c i e n t , and the f r i c t i o n - p e r c o l a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t , respectively^

The r e f r a c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t is separately d e f i n e d as

K (67)

the square r o o t of the r a t i o of the widths between orthogonals i n deep and

shallow w a t e r . A c c o r d i n g to linea.r t h e o r y , depends only on wave
p e r i o d , water depth contours and i n i t i a l deep water wave d i r e c t i o n . I n
p r a c t i c a l coastal engineering p r o b l e m s , r e f r a c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s can be
d e t e r m i n e d by one of two methods: wave f r o n t and d i r e c t ray or orthogonal
methods, both of w h i c h are d i s c u s s e d i n B, E . B , T . R. 4 ( 1 9 6 1 ) .

The shoaling c o e f f i c i e n t is given c o m p l e t e l y , a c c o r d i n g to l i n e a r

wave t h e o r y , by:

K (68)

The wave c e l e r i t y C i n shallow water is r e l a t e d to i n deep water by

C C tanh kh (69)
o

and i n deep water n^ = 1/2, whence f r o m Eqs, (63), (68), and (69)
-1/2
2 kh tanh kh (70)
K 1+
sinh 2 kh

K is then given e x p l i c i t l y as a f u n c t i o n of h / L or h / L ^ and m a y be

obtained f r o m tables by W i e g e l (1954) where K,, = H / H

56
 The f r i c t i o n - p e r c o l a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t K^^ i s delined as
1/2
^ > (71)
fp o o

R e t u r n i n g to E q . (59) and s u b s t i t u t i n g Pb frona Eq. (71), one obtains

d ( K . ^)
p b J ^ = - (D. + D ) b (72)
o o dx i p

or

A c c o r d i n g to P u t n a m and Johnson (1949)

* ^ T (sinh kh)-^

and according to P u t n a m (1949)

D
p
. ±Jll-
. ,rr,2
.gPH^^
smh 2 k h
(75)
^T

In Eqs. (74) and (75)

= m a s s density of water
f = dimensionless f r i c t i o n f a c t o r
U - k i n e m a t i c v i s c o s i t y of sea water
p = p e r m e a b i l i t y c o e f f i c i e n t of D a r c y ' s L a w having
the dimensions of (length)

E q . (75) is applicable f o r h / L > 0. 3 but becomes m o r e c o m -

p l i c a t e d f o r h / L < 0. 3.

R e t u r n i n g to the d i f f e r e n t i a l E q . (73) and i n view of E q s . (74) and

(75), one r e c o g n i z e s , a f t e r c a r e f u l examination, that this is of the same
general f o r m as B e r n o u l l i ' s nonlinear d i f f e r e n t i a l equation of the f i r s t
o r d e r ; i . e.

+ My = Ny'" (76)

57
 Without going into the algebra, one m a y w r i t e E q . (73) as f o l l o w s :

F
F, (77)
K
fp
and the s o l u t i o n i s :

1 -/^pdx F dx
K ƒ P
fp F^ dx + Const 78)

In g e n e r a l , n u m e r i c a l i n t e g r a t i o n of E q . (78) is r e q u i r e d , but a
number of special cases have been investigated by B r e t s c h n e i d e r and
Reid (1954). Of m o s t i n t e r e s t at p r e s e n t a r e two s i m p l e cases: (1) no
b o t t o m f r i c t i o n , and (2) no p e r c o l a t i o n .

The f i r s t case f o r F , = 0 r e s u l t s m K where

f rx fp
^ P
F dx
K = • e (79)

The second case f o r F ^ = 0 r e s u l t s i n K^^ = where

'X -1
1+ F^ dx (80)
^f =

F o r a b o t t o m of constant depth E q s . (79) and (80) become

respectively
- F X
K P (81)
= e

and

1 + F (82)

E q s . (81) and (82) can be used f o r p r a c t i c a l engineering solutions f o r a

b o t t o m of v a r i a b l e depth where s m a l l i n c r e m e n t s of A x a r e selected,
each i n c r e m e n t having a b o t t o m of constant depth equal to the m e a n depth
over the i n c r e m e n t ; i . e.

K fp = l A K f • A K (83)
where
-FpAx
AK : (84)

58
and
1+ Ax (85)

Graphs presented by B r e t s c h n e i d e r and Reid (1954) can be used

to f a c i l i t a t e computations by the n u m e r i c a l method.

B o t t o m f r i c t i o n and shoaling m o d i f i c a t i o n s can be obtained by use

of F i g u r e s 26,and 27. F i g u r e 26 i s based on a bottom of constant depth,
but can be used f o r a v a r i a b l e b o t t o m by r e p r e s e n t i n g the b o t t o m by a
s e r i e s of sections, each having an average bottom depth.

59
 WITH

.999.998 .995 .99 .98 .95 .90 .80 .70 .60 .50 . 40 .30 .20 .10
MAY 1961

FIGURE 26 RELATIONSHIP FOR

FRICTION LOSS OVER A
BOTTOM OF CONSTANT DEPTH
60
 1.2

in

1.0

0.91 ! \ l 1 i ! i J L_J L_l I L

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.5 2 9 10

dj[ sec?/ft.) MAY 1961

FIGURE 27 Kg VERSUS T^/dj

IV. G E N E R A T I O N OF WIND WAVES I N S H A L L O W W A T E R

Less i n f o r m a t i o n is available on wind waves i n shallow water than

i n deep w a t e r . T h i s is t r u e i n r e g a r d to both t h e o r y and available data.
The f i r s t i n f o r m a t i o n on t h i s subject was given by T h i j s s e (1949), based
on l i m i t e d data. A d d i t i o n a l data and r e l a t i o n s h i p s w e r e brought f o r t h
by D r . Garbis Keulegan at the National Bureau of Standards, although
never published to the knowledge of the author. The U. S. A r m y Corps
of E n g i n e e r s , J a c k s o n v i l l e D i s t r i c t (1955), p e r f o r m e d an extensive f i e l d
i n v e s t i g a t i o n on w i n d , waves and tides i n Lake Okeechobee, F l o r i d a .
Based on the h u r r i c a n e w i n d and wave data f r o m L a k e Okeechobee, and
some o r d i n a r y w i n d wave data f r o m the shallow regions of the Gulf of
M e x i c o , B r e t s c h n e i d e r ( 1954) was able to e s t a b l i s h a n u m e r i c a l p r o c e d u r e
f o r computing w i n d waves i n shallow w a t e r t a k i n g b o t t o m f r i c t i o n into
account. A f r i c t i o n f a c t o r of f = . 0 1 appears s a t i s f a c t o r y . P r e s e n t l y
these techniques are used f o r the continental shelf, but m a y r e q u i r e f u r t h e r
c a l i b r a t i o n when m o r e w i n d and wave data are a v a i l a b l e .

A. G E N E R A T I O N O F WIND WAVES OVER A B O T T O M OF

CONSTANT D E P T H

I f d / T ^ < 2. 5 f t / s e c ^ , then the waves e f f e c t i v e l y " f e e l b o t t o m "

and the depth and b o t t o m conditions enter as a d d i t i o n a l f a c t o r s w i t h
r e s p e c t to the heights and p e r i o d s of waves which can be generated. The
e f f e c t of f r i c t i o n a l d i s s i p a t i o n of energy at the b o t t o m f o r such waves
l i m i t s the rate of wave generation and also places an upper l i m i t on the
wave heights w h i c h can be generated by a given w i n d speed and f e t c h
length.

F i g u r e 4, the d i m e n s i o n l e s s deep water wave f o r e c a s t i n g r e l a t i o n -

ships, i n e f f e c t r e p r e s e n t s the generation of wave energy i n deep w a t e r
as a f u n c t i o n of F , U and t , since the energy i.s p r o p o r t i o n a l to H ^ ,
whereas F i g u r e 26 r e p r e s e n t s the d i s s i p a t i o n cf wave energy due to
b o t t o m f r i c t i o n . F i g u r e s 4 and 26 w e r e combined by a n u m e r i c a l method
of successive a p p r o x i m a t i o n to obtain r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r the generation of
waves over an i m p e r m e a b l e b o t t o m of constant depth. Best agreement
between wave data and the n u m e r i c a l method was obtained when a b o t t o m
f r i c t i o n f a c t o r of f = . 01 was selected. Perhaps a " c a l i b r a t i o n ' f r i c t i o n
f a c t o r " is a m o r e a p p r o p r i a t e t e r m since i t would take into account other
i n f l u e n t i a l f a c t o r s not n o r m a l l y i n c l u d e d in the f r i c t i o n f a c t o r t e r m such
as energy loss by " w h i t e c a p s , " The c u r v e s of f i g u r e 28 are the r e s u l t s
of these computations. The c u r v e of g T / U v e r s u s g d / U is based on
2 2 2
the wave data, whereas the curves of g H / U v e r s u s g d / U and g F / U
are based on the n u m e r i c a l computations. The curves c>f these f i g u r e s
are not too m u c h d i f f e r e n t f r o m those presented by T h i j s s e and S c h i j f ,
(1949), r e p r o d u c e d i n F i g u r e 30, F i g u r e 29, based on F i g u r e 28, gives
wave f o r e c a s t i n g curves f o r shallow water of constant depth and u n l i m i t e d
w i n d d u r a t i o n and f e t c h l e n g t h . F i g u r e 28 m a y be used when both the
f e t c h length as w e l l as the depth are r e s t r i c t e d .

62
Ui

FIGURE 2 8 GENERATION OF WIND OVER A B O T T O M OF C O N S T A N T DEPTH

FOR U N L I M I T E D WIND DURATION REPRESENTED AS DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETERS
 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 1213 14 15 I6I7I8I920 25 30 35 40
MEAN WATER DEPTH IN FEET

FIGURE 2 9 WAVE FORECASTING RELATIONSHIPS FOR

SHALLOW WATER OF CONSTANT DEPTH

64
FIGURE 30 GROWTH OF WAVES IN A LIMITED DEPTH
 The i m p o r t a n t f a c t f r o m the above m a t e r i a l , however, i s the
establishment of a n u m e r i c a l procedure f o r computing w i n d waves m
shallow water of constant depth which can be v e r i f i e d by use of wave
data T h i s p r o c e d u r e can be extended to a b o t t o m of constant slope
w h e r e i n the b o t t o m is segmented into elements, each element h a v m g
a mean depth assumed to be constant. Sample computations f o r a t y p i c a l
continental shelf are given by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1957).

P r e s e n t l y , the system of calculations is being p r a c t i c e d on gen-

e r a t i o n of w i n d wave spectra over the continental shelf. I t w i l l be some
t i m e i n the f u t u r e b e f o r e the system is p e r f e c t e d . However, F i g u r e 3 1 ,
r e p r o d u c e d f r o m B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1964), i s a t y p i c a l example r e s u l t i n g
f r o m c a l c u l a t i o n of wave spectra i n shallow w a t e r , t a k i n g into account the
combined e f f e c t of b o t t o m f r i c t i o n and w i n d a c t i o n . The hindcast deep
water wave spectra is based on the m e t h o d of B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1957) and
b o t t o m f r i c t i o n i s taken into account a c c o r d i n g to the method of
B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1963) w h e r e i n the wind e f f e c t is added.

66
600

f sec-'

FIGURE 31 WAVE SPECTRA

FOR A T L A N T I C C I T Y , N . J .

f sea
V. DECAY O F WAVES I N D E E P W A T E R

When waves leave a generating area and t r a v e l through a c a l m

or an area o£ l i g h t w i n d s , a t r a n s f o r m a t i o n takes place. A t any p a r t i c u l a r
t i m e and w i t h respect to decay distance, the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height
decreases and the m o d a l p e r i o d s h i f t s to the longer p e r i o d waves,
r e s u l t i n g i n an apparent increase i n s i g n i f i c a n t wave p e r i o d . H o w e v e r ,
at a p a r t i c u l a r decay distance the m o d a l p e r i o d decreases. To u n d e r -
stand the s i g n i f i c a n c e of a p e r i o d s h i f t , one m u s t r e f e r to the spectrum,
of waves and the o r i g i n a l w o r k of B a r b e r and U r s e l l (1948). Recent
w o r k of Munk (1964) shows that m o s t of t h i s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n takes place
in the f i r s t 1000 m i l e s of decay. Based on f i e i d tests of waves a r r i v i n g
f r o m the southern h e m i s p h e r e and t r a v e r s i n g a great c i r c l e to A l a s k a ,
M u n k (1964) shows that t h e r e i s a v e r y r a p i d loss or t r a n s f o r m a t i o n of
energy d u r i n g the f i r s t 1000 m i l e s and a s h i f t of peak f r e q u e n c y to about
0. 6 to 0. 7 sec" ^ a f t e r w h i c h l i t t l e change o c c u r s .

The w o r k of W i e g e l and K i m b e r l y (1950) and B r e t s c h n e i d e r ( 1950)

was included i n the r e v i s i o n s i n f o r e c a s t i n g deca.y of s w e l l . E m p i r i c a l
r e l a t i o n s h i p s w e r e developed, based on the c o r r e l a t i o n of wave data
obtained o f f Southern C a l i f o r n i a and w i n d and f e t c h c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ob-
tained f r o m weather c h a r t s of the Southern H e m i s p h e r e , f r o m where the
waves had o r i g i n a t e d . The r a t h e r meager data w e r e r e c o r d e d i n shallow
water and had to be t r a n s f o r m e d f o r deep water a c c o r d i n g to the shoaling
c o e f f i c i e n t s given by F i g u r e 27. I n spite of the above d i f f i c u l t i e s ,
e m p i r i c a l f o r e c a s t i n g c u r v e s f o r wave decay were d e t e r m i n e d by B r e t -
schneider (1951) and are presented i n F i g u r e 32. The scatter of data
on w h i c h these curves are based indicates that the above r e l a t i o n s cs.n
deviate by as m u c h as t 50 percent. A l t h o u g h these curves are not c o m -
p l e t e l y s a t i s f a c t o r y , they are the best available to date. F u r t h e r
refinements are certainly necessary.

A s s u m i n g average conditions f o r a severe s t o r m , a wave spect;ra

hindcast was made f o r the end of the f e t c h , and assuming that F i g u r e 32
applied f o r H ^ ^ / H ^ as a f u n c t i o n of T f o r decay of the wave s p e c t r a ,
computations w e r e made f o r v a r i o u s elements of the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m .
The r e s u l t s of these c a l c u l a t i o n s are shown i n F i g u r e 33. The c u r v e f o r
D = 0 i s zero decay distance or the end of the f e t c h . Other values of the
decay distance D are given i n n a u t i c a l m i l e s . The short p e r i o d waves
disappear r a p i d l y , leaving only the longer p e r i o d waves to decay m o r e
slowly.
The areas under each s p e c t r u m are r e l a t e d to the square of the
c o r r e s p o n d i n g s i g n i f i c a n t wave height, and the m o d a l p e r i o d is close
to the s i g n i f i c a n t wave p e r i o d . F i g u r e 34 shows the change i n sign..£icant
wave height and p e r i o d as a f u n c t i o n of decay distance. F r o m t h i s f i g u r e
i t is seen that m o s t of the decay takes place d u r i n g the f i r s t 1000 m i l e s

68
 TD/T,. RELATIVE WAVE PERIOD AT END OF DECAY DISTANCE
T f . S E C O N D S , SlGNrFICANT WflVE PERIOD AT EMO OF F,^,

0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

Hf, FEET, SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT AT END O F F„ HQ/MP RELATIVE WAVE HEISHT AT END OF DECAY DISTANCE

( B r e t s c h n e i d e r , 1952)

FIGURE 32 FORECASTING CURVES FOR WAVE DECAY

 T SEC.

FIGURE 33 DECAY OF WAVE

SPECTRA WITH DISTANCE
70
SEC. 16

O 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

DECAY DISTANCE - NAUTICAL MILES

35

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

DECAY DISTANCE— NAUTICAL MILES

RGURE 34 DECAY OF SIGNIFICANT WAVES WITH DISTANCE

a f t e r which l i t t l e change o c c u r s , w h i c h is i n agreement w i t h the idea
proposed by M u n k (1964). The r e l a t i o n s h i p s of F i g u r e 34, having been
based on e m p i r i c a l data, do not indicate how the energy is d i s p e r s e d ,
dissipated or t r a n s f o r m e d f r o m one f r e q u e n c y to another.

No r e l a t i o n s h i p s have been developed to show how the wave

s p e c t r u m decays w i t h r e s p e c t to t i m e at a p a r t i c u l a r l o c a t i o n . The
wave spectra data of I j i m a ( 1957) show that the s h i f t i n m o d a l p e r i o d is
opposite to that given i n F i g u r e 33, as should be expected. F i g u r e 35
r e p r e s e n t s f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m f o r i n c r e a s e of waves and f o r decrease
of waves, r e p r o d u c e d f r o m I j i m a (1957). The g r o w t h of wave energy i s
f r o m h i g h f r e q u e n c y (low period) and the decay of wave energy i s f r o m
low f r e q u e n c y (long p e r i o d ) .

The c o m b i n a t i o n of w i n d waves and s w e l l can lead to a m u l t i -

peaked s p e c t r u m . T h i s i s p a r t i c u l a r l y t r u e f o r h u r r i c a n e conditions
where the h u r r i c a n e winds act at n e a r l y a r i g h t angle to the d i r e c t i o n
of s w e l l propagated ahead of the s t o r m as the s t o r m moves over the s w e l l .
A t y p i c a l i l l u s t r a t i o n of these conditions is 'shown f o r H u r r i c a n e Donna
by B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1961) iri; anvliippendixito the-paper by G a l d w é l l ah^
W i l l i a m s (1961) as published i h Ocean Wave Spectra (1963). A d e m o n -
s t r a t i o n of t h i s phenomenon is shown i l l u s t r a t i v e l y i n F i g u r e 36 f o r the
p e r i o d s p e c t r u m and w h i c h , when t r a n s f o r m e d to the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m ,
i s shown i n F i g u r e 37, r e m e m b e r i n g that S(f) = T ^ S(T), I t m i g h t be
noticed that a c a r e f u l i n s p e c t i o n of F i g u r e s 36 and 37 reveals the f a c t that
f o r c e r t a i n applications the p e r i o d s p e c t r u m has c e r t a i n advantages over
the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m . I t appears that i f the f r e q u e n c y s p e c t r u m w e r e
plotted on a l o g scale, t h e r e would be a c l a r i f i c a t i o n of the apparent
difficulties.

F i g u r e 32 is based e n t i r e l y on m e a g e r e m p i r i c a l data. These

r e l a t i o n s h i p s take into account the generating f e t c h length, and as a
r e s u l t give a f a m i l y of r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r wave decay, whereas the o r i g i n a l
w o r k of S v e r d r u p and M u n k (1947) gives a single r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r wave
decay. I t should be m e n t i o n e d that the w o r k of P i e r s o n , Neumann and
James (1955), as outlined i n H y d r o g r a p h i c O f f i c e P u b l i c a t i o n 603, o f f e r s
the best s c i e n t i f i c means f o r d e s c r i b i n g the decay of waves. F u r t h e r
r e s e a r c h and c o l l e c t i o n of f i e l d data is n e c e s s a r y b e f o r e the f i l t e r
techniques proposed i n H . O. p u b l i c a t i o n 603 can be i m p l e m e n t e d f o r
practical applications.

72
 T ( AFTER IJIMA )

FIGURE 35 TYPICAL CHANGE OF

WAVE ENERGY SPECTRUM IN THE
BUILD-UP AND DECAY OF WAVES
73
 30

28

26
/ ^ '1000 ^

24

22

20

18

16
2(T)
H

"•"/sec. 14

\
\
12 ( / \ \
V \
\ N
10 \ \
LOCAL
\ \
\ \
STORM

\
\

4
SWELL

O
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

T SEC.

FIGURE 36 EXAMPLE OF PERIOD

SPECTRA OF COMBINED
LOCAL STORM AND SWELL
75
VI. W A V E STATISTICS

Wave s t a t i s t i c s are d e f i n e d i n t e r m s of p r o b a b i l i t y of o c c u r r e n c e
or r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l s , f o r example the average number of y e a r s
r e q u i r e d f o r a p a r t i c u l a r value of the s i g n i f i c a n t wave height to be
equalled or exceeded. T h i s d e f i n i t i o n does not n e c e s s a r i l y have the same
s t a t i s t i c a l m e a n i n g as wave v a r i a b i l i t y . Wave v a r i a b i l i t y i s r e s e r v e d f o r
wave height or p e r i o d d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r a p a r t i c u l a r continuous wave r e c o r d .

I n this section p r o b a b i l i t y is d e f i n e d as the percent of t i m e a

p a r t i c u l a r event i s expected to o c c u r . The c u m u l a t i v e p r o b a b i l i t y is
the percent of t i m e a p a r t i c u l a r event is equalled or exceeded. The
r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l is the t i m e r e q u i r e d f o r a p a r t i c u l a r event to r e c u r .
I n o r d e r to d e t e r m i n e c u m u l a t i v e p r o b a b i l i t y and r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l s
of wave heights f r o m severe s t o r m s w h i c h m i g h t be p r o g n o s t i c a t e d f r o m
c l i m a t o l o g i c a l events, s e v e r a l methods of approach m i g h t be u t i l i z e d .
I f data w e r e m e a s u r e d over a s u f f i c i e n t length of t i m e , t h i s would be
u s e f u l . O t h e r w i s e , wave hindcasts f r o m past m e t e o r o l o g i c a l weather
maps can be made f o r p r e s e n t a t i o n of the data. The m e t h o d of B e a r d
(1952) has been used s u c c e s s f u l l y f o r s m a l l samples - - 20 to 40 y e a r s
of r e c o r d s - - b y h y d r o l o g i s t s and h y d r a u l i c engineers to p r e d i c t r e c u r -
rence i n t e r v a l s f o r peak f l o o d s i n engineering studies of watersheds,
r e s e r v o i r capacity and dam c o n s t r u c t i o n .

The equations f r o m B e a r d (1952) f o r d e t e r m i n i n g p r o b a b i l i t i e s

and r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l s a r e as f o l l o w s :

P = 100 ^-=-^ (86)

and
I - lOOY (87\
^ SP

where S = t o t a l number of o c c u r r e n c e s on r e c o r d ,

s = the s u m m a t i o n of o c c u r r e n c e s , beginning w i t h the l o w e s t

value to any successive h i g h e r value u n t i l s = S.

P = the c u m u l a t i v e p r o b a b i l i t y that an event is equal to or

less than a p a r t i c u l a r value.

Y = the number of y e a r s of r e c o r d ,

I - the r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l i n y e a r s c o r r e s p o n d i n g to the
p r o b a b i l i t y P and the number of y e a r s of r e c o r d Y ,
 G e n e r a l l y , the p r o b a b i l i t y P versus the magnitude of the event
is aplotted on p r o b a b i l i t y paper and a smooth curve is c o n s t r u c t e d . F r o n
the smooth c u r v e values of the event and the c o r r e s p o n d i n g p r o b a b i l i t y
are d e t e r m i n e d , and the r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l I is then d e t e r m i n e d f r o m
E q . (87).

Instead of using the g r a p h i c a l plot on p r o b a b i l i t y paper, one could

use to a better degree of a c c u r a c y the W e i b u l l d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n , E q .
(33):
(88)

I f the data f o l l o w a n e a r l y l i n e a r r e l a t i o n s h i p a c c o r d i n g to the

above equations, then a g r a p h i c a l d e t e r n i i n a t i o n can be made. I f
r e q u i r e d , a s t a t i s t i c a l least squares technique can be used to obtain the
best f i t p a r a m e t e r s A and M . Once the p r o p e r a n a l y t i c a l equation
has been d e t e r m i n e d f o r the p r o b a b i l i t y P , then the r e c u r r e n c e i n t e r v a l
I can be d e t e r m i n e d as b e f o r e .

Jasper (1956) presented s t a t i s t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n s of s i g n i f i c a n t

wave heights based on about 5 - 1 / 2 or 6 years of Weather B u r e a u data
f o r c e r t a i n stations of the N o r t h A t l a n t i c , These data r e s u l t e d i n a
l i n e a r r e l a t i o n s h i p on l o g n o r m a l p r o b a b i l i t y paper. F i g u r e 38 is
r e p r o d u c e d f r o m Jasper (1956),

M o r e r e c e n t data on wave s t a t i s t i c s have been presented i n t a b u l a r

f o r m by M . D a r b y s h i r e (1963). These data are i n t e r m s of the m a x i m u m
wave m e a s u r e d and the c o r r e s p o n d i n g wave p e r i o d .
0.01 99.99
NOTE: THE STRAIGHT LINES ARE THE LOG-NORMAL
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTIONS COMPUTED
0.05
DIRECTLY FROM THE E X P E R I M E N T A L DATA.
0.1 999
STATION I
0.2 99.8
> OBSERVATIONS
0.5 OF SIGNIFICANT WAVE • 99.5
HEIGHT (FROM U.S. WEATHER
I BUREAU DATA 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 5 3 ) 99

2 STATION J 98
• OBSERVATIONS
OF SIGNIFICANT WAVE
5 95
HEIGHT (FROM U.S WEATHER
BUREAU DATA 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 5 3 )
10 90

20 80

30 70

40 60

50 50

60 40

70 30

80 20

90

95 I
STATIONS I AND J
98 MEASUREMENTS OF MAXIMUM WAVE 2
HEIGHT OBTAINED BY DARBYSHIRE CD
99 I <
(REFERENCE 9) DURING PERIOD F E B . CQ
99.5 1953 JAN 1954 0.5 O
OC
99.8 0.2 a.

99.9 0.1
0.05

9a99 0.01
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 7 0 8 0 9 0
( AFTER JASPER )
WAVE HEIGHT-FEET

FIGURE 38 COMPARISON OF
WAVE HEIGHT DISTRIBUTIONS DERIVED
FROM VISUAL OBSERVATIONS AND FROM
MEASUREMENTS OF WAVE HEIGHTS AT
ATLANTIC OCEAN STATIONS I AND J
78
VII. WIND SPEED VERSUS WIND SPEED

T h i s section on wind speed v e r s u s w i n d speed is indeed a subject

about w h i c h m u c h d i s c u s s i o n can be p r o m o t e d . Although there are c o n -
t r o v e r s i e s about use of the p r o p e r wind speed i n wave f o r e c a s t i n g , t h e r e
can be no d i s a g r e e m e n t that m u c h r e s e a r c h i s r e q u i r e d to standardize
wind speed as r e l a t e d to wave generation. I t appears that each author
of a p a r t i c u l a r wave f o r e c a s t i n g technique has his own d e f i n i t i o n of w i n d
speed, whereas the user of the wave f o r e c a s t i n g techniques sometimes
uses a m i x e d d e f i n i t i o n . I t is no wonder that the v a r i o u s methods have
been c i r i t c i z e d by the u s e r s .

P i e r s o n (1963) f o r the f i r s t t i m e gave a r e m i n d e r that the w i n d

data obtained by Neumann (1948 and 1952) was a c t u a l l y m e a s u r e d at 7. 5
m e t e r s above the sea, aboard a ship, w h i c h i t s e l f was bobbing i n the sea.
A hand anemometer extended on a pole away f r o m the ship was used to
r e c o r d the w i n d speed, and, at the same t i m e , the waves w e r e o b s e r v e d .
The type of average wind speed d e t e r m i n e d is d i f f i c u l t to know. P e r h a p s
some of the scatter of the data given i n F i g u r e 18, r e p r o d u c e d f r o m
Neumann (1952), is due to conditions under w h i c h the m e a s u r e m e n t s w e r e
made. H o w e v e r , the averages can s t i l l be of i m p o r t a n c e .

A n a t t e m p t by P i e r s o n (1963) was made to i n t e r p r e t wave s p e c t r a

i n t e r m s of the w i n d p r o f i l e instead of w i n d m e a s u r e d at a constant
elevation, and P i e r s o n and M o s k o w i t z (1963) proposed a wave spectra
based on w i n d data m e a s u r e d at a constant height of 19, 5 m e t e r s above
mean sea l e v e l . T h i s was done to avoid using d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t s by other
authors f o r r e d u c i n g the wind speed to some other standard elevation,
P i e r s o n (1963) also attempted to r e c o n c i l e the d i f f e r e n c e s between the
v a r i o u s spectra on the basis of the e l e v a t i o n at w h i c h winds were mea.sured,
and he advocated longer averages f o r w i n d speed i n o r d e r to obtain b e t t e r
c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h the averaged wave data,

D a r b y s h i r e (1952, 1955) r e l a t e d wave data w i t h the geostrophic

wind speed c a l c u l a t e d f r o m the s u r f a c e p r e s s u r e gradient. Since the
i s o b a r s w e r e smoothed t h r o u g h the r e c o r d e d p r e s s u r e data, the geo-
strophic w i n d r e p r e s e n t e d some type of a longer t i m e average.

B r e t s c h n e i d e r (1951, 1959) c a l c u l a t e d a surface wind speed f r o m

the geostrophic w i n d speed, t a k i n g into account c u r v a t u r e and a i r - s e a
t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n c e s . The c o r r e c t i o n s due to c u r v a t u r e and a i r - s e a
t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n c e s w e r e based on the o r i g i n a l e m p i r i c a l S c r i p p s
data given by A r t h u r (1947). These data w e r e c o r r e l a t e d w i t h the ob-
served or r e c o r d e d o n e - m i n u t e average w i n d speeds. F i g u r e 39,
based on the geostrophic w i n d d u r a t i o n , and f i g u r e 40, based on the
Scripps data of A r t h u r (1947), can be used to calculate a mean s u r f a c e
wind speed, p r e s u m a b l y f o r an elevation of 10 m e t e r s above the m e a n

\
79
 30 35 40 45 50 55 6 0 6 5 70
DEGREES LATITUDE
( B R E T S C H N E I D E R , 1952)

FIGURE 39 GEOSTROPHIC WIND SCALE

" Züpsmtf,
FOR Ap = 5mb a 3mb
An = DEGREES LATITUDE
p : 1013.3 mb
T = I0-C
o = 1.2 xlO"'=gm/cnfi'=>

80
. 4 5 1
15 -10 -5 0 +5 +10 +15
DIFFERENCE SEA-AIR TEMPERATURE (TgTs-TaTa')

FIGURE 40 SURFACE WIND SCALE

(BRETSCHNEIDER 1952)

11
sea s u r f a c e . Sometimes the p r e s s u r e gradients are not too w e l l defined
p a r t i c u l a r l y f o r l i g h t e r winds, but i n any case the calculated w i n d speed,
should agree w i t h the m e a s u r e d wind speeds to w i t h i n t 15%.

The data of Goodyear (1963) show a considerable amount of

scatter between the c a l c u l a t e d wind speed and the observed wind speed,
and states that the " c a l c u l a t e d wind speeds r e p r e s e n t a 10 t o 15 m i n u t e
average" whereas the m e a s u r e d wind speeds are at the m o s t s e v e r a l
m i n u t e s d u r a t i o n . F i g u r e 4 1 , r e p r o d u c e d f r o m Goodyear (1963), show-
the deviations between observed one^ or t w o - m i n u t e a.verage w i n d speed
and the calculated 10 to 15 m i n u t e average wind speed f r o m p r e s s u r e
g r a d i e n t s . I t is no wonder that W i l s o n (1963) could not calculate w i n d
speeds f r o m the p r e s s u r e gradients and obtain a c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h the
r e p o r t e d w i n d speeds. Instead W i l s o n (1963) uses the r e p o r t e d wind sp^
to calculate i s o l i n e s of constant w i n d speed, but this m u s t also e n t a i l an
averaging p r o c e s s , an average w i t h r e s p e c t to distance. F u r t h e r , when
using the s p a c e - t i m e wind f i e l d concept t h e r e is s t i l l another average:
a. t i m e average f r o m one weather map to the next. Some of the ship
r e p o r t s of winds are winds m e a s u r e d at elevations d i f f e r e n t f r o m , 19. 5
m e t e r s above the sea. One can h a r d l y help wonder what wind speed
is being t a l k e d about.

C e r t a i n l y t h e r e are d i r e c t i o n a l spectra of winds (which v a r y w i t h

elev"i,tion), j u s t as there are d i r e c t i o n a l spectra of waves. H o r i z o n t a l
va.riation i n w i n d speed and d i r e c t i o n m u s t be considered of great i m -
portance i n wave generation, p a r t i c u l a r l y when one discusses e f f e c t i v e
fetches and d u r a t i o n s as w e l l as f u l l y - d e v e l o p e d seas. U n t i l m o r e c a r e
is ta.ken i n r e p o r t i n g winds and d e f i n i n g w i n d v a r i a b i l i t y , one cannot
expect a,ny novel advances i n wave f o r e c a s t i n g . Even then i t w i l l be
r e q u i r e d to c o r r e l a t e new wave spectra data w i t h new wind speed d e t e r -
minations .

P r e s e n t l y the f o r e c a s t e r must use the e x i s t i n g tools f o r calc -:'.:-: ".i

waves. He m u s t use the type of wind analysis f o r m a k i n g the forecas'.
which is c o m p a t i b l e to the methods used to develop the f o r e c a s t i n g
r e l a t i o n s h i p s and p r o c e d u r e s . A change i n the procedures on which the
tools are o r i g i n a l l y based should also r e q u i r e a change i n tne t o o l s , or
else the a c c u r a c y of the f o r e c a s t s w i l l become w o r s e instead of b e t t e r .

82
O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
COMPUTED WIND SPEED (Ms)
(AFTER GOODYEAR, 1963 )

FIGURE 41 COMPUTED vs. OBSERVED

SURFACE WIND SPEED FOR 43
RANDOMLY SELECTED POINTS
83
 REFERENCES

1825
Weber, E r n s t H e i n r i c h and W i l h e l m (1825). "Experimental Determination
of W a v e s . " L e i p z i g .

1848

A i r y , G. B , (1848). "On Tides and Waves. " Encyclopaedia M e t r o p o l i t a n a .

1864

Stevenson, Thomas (1864). Design and C o n s t r u c t i o n of H a r b o u r s .

A d a m and Cli. B l a c k , Edinborough, 64 pp.

1871

P a r i s , A . (1871). " O b s e r v a t i o n s on the State of the Sea c o l l e c t e d on

B o a r d the D U P L I E X and the M I N I E R V A . " Revue M a r i t i m e et
Coloniale.

1887

K e l v i n , L o r d (1887). "On the Waves P r o d u c e d by a Single I m p u l s e i n

Water of any Depth, or i n a D i s p e r s i v e M e d i u m . " P r o c . , Roy.
Soc., 42, 80.

1888

A b e r c r o m b y , Ralph (1888). " O b s e r v a t i o n s on the Height, Length and

V e l o c i t y of Ocean Waves. " P h i l o s o p h i c a l M a g . , X X V .

H e l m h o l t z , H . (1888). S i t z - B e r . A k a d . W i s s B e r l i n 647.

1893

Schott, G e r h a r d (1893). " S c i e n t i f i c Results of an Ocean R e s e a r c h E x -

pedition. " Pet. M i t t . , Erganzungsheft 109, Gotha.

1896

Gassenmayr, O.-, (1896). "Wave M e a s u r e m e n t i n the A t l a n t i c Ocean. "

M i t t . a. d. Geb. Seewesens, X X I V , P o l a .

1904

C o r n i s h , Vaughan (1904). " O n the D i m e n s i o n s of Deep Sea Waves, and

t h e i r Relations to M e t e o r o l o g i c a l and Geographical Conditions. "
Geographical J o u r . , London, X I I I .

84
1910
C o r n i s h , Vaughan (1910). Waves of the Sea and Other Water Waves.
T . F i s h e r Unwin, London.

1914

Buckingham, E . (1914). "On P h y s i c a l l y S i m i l a r Systems. " Phys. Rev. ,

4, 345.

1924

J e f f r e y s , H . (1924), "On the F o r m a t i o n of Water Waves by Wind. "

P r o c . , Roy. S o c , A107, p. 189.

1928

Schumacher, A , (1928). "Stereophotography of Waves by the German

A t l a n t i c E x p e d i t i o n . " Z e i t s c h r i f t Ges. E r d k . B e r l i n , E r g a n s ,
Heft III,

1934

C o r n i s h , Vaughan (1934), Ocean Waves and K i n d r e d P h y s i c a l Phenomena,

C a m b r i d g e , EnglanST

W i l l i a m s , C, H . (1934). "Notes on Sea and Swell Observations, "

M a r i n e O b s e r v e r , V o l . 11.

1935

W h i t e m a r s h , R. P . (1935). " G r e a t Sea Waves. " H y d r o g r a p h i c Review.

V . 12, No. 1, M a y .

1936
W e i n b l u m , G. and W. B l o c k (1936). " S t e r e o p h o t o g r a m m e t r i c Wave R e c o r d
Schiffbauteschnische, Ges -Jahrbuch, V . 37, pp. 214-250.

1945

L a m b , Horace (1945). Hydrodynamics. 6th E d . , Dover P u b l i c a t i o n s ,

738 pp.

Southons, C. T . (1945). "The F o r e c a s t i n g of Sea and Swell Waves. "

Naval M e t . B r a n c h , England (Unpublished Report)

1947
A r t h u r , R. S, (1947). " R e v i s e d Wave F o r e c a s t i n g Graphs and P r o c e d u r e s .
Wave R e p o r t No, 73, Scripps I n s t i t u t i o n of Oceanography, 14 pp.

85
Munk, W a l t e r H . (1947>. " A C r i t i c a l W i n d Speed f o r A i r - S e a Boundary
P r o c e s s e s . " J o u r n a l o f M a r i n e R e s e a r c h , V o l . 6, pp. 203-218.

S v e r d r u p , H . U . and W. H . M u n k (1947). " W i n d , Sea and Swell: T h e o r y

of Relations f o r F o r e c a s t i n g . " H y d r o g r a p h i c O f f i c e Pub. No. 6 0 1 ,
U. S. D e p a r t m e n t of the Navy, 44 pp.

.1948
B a r b e r , N . F . and F . U r s e l l (1948). " T h e Generation and P r o p a g a t i o n of
Ocean Waves and Swell: P a r t I , P e r i o d s and V e l o c i t i e s . " P h i l .
T r a n s , y Roy./ Soci , London, A 2 4 0 , pp. 527-560.

M a s o n , M a r t i n A . (1948). " A Study of P r o g r e s s i v e O s c i l l a t o r y Waves

i n Water. " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , O f f i c e of the Chief of E n g i n -
eers, T e c h . R e p o r t No. . 1.

S e i w e l l , H . R. (1948), "Results of R e s e a r c h on Surface Waves of the

W e s t e r n N o r t h A t l a n t i c . " P a p e r , 'Phys. Oceanog. M e t . , M a s s .
Inst.: of T e c h . and Woods Hole Oce.anog. Inst.,,; 10, No. 4, pp. 1-46.

1949
T h i j s s e , J. T h . and J . B ' . S c h i j f (1949)., "Reports on Waves; " 17th
I n t e r n a t i o n a l N a v i g a t i o n Congress, Section I I , C o m m u n i c a t i o n 4,
Lisbon.
T u k e y , ' J . W- (1949)i "The Sampling T h e o r y of S p e c t r u m E s t i m a t e s . "
S y m p o s i u m on A p p l i c a t i o n s of A u t o - c o r r e l a t i o n A n a l y s i s to P h y s i c a l
P r o b l e m s , Woods H o l é , M a s s .

1950
B r e t s c h n e i d e r , G. L . (1950)., "A.Study of Southern Swell at Camp
Pendleton,' Oceanside, C a l i f o r n i a , f o r A p r i l , M a y , and J u n e . "
(Unpublished m a n u s c r i p t )
Johnson, J . W^ (1950). "Relationships between W i n d and Waves, Abbots
Lagoon, C a l i f o r n i a . " T r a n s . , A G U , V o l . 3 1 , pp. 386-392.

U. S. A r m y Engineer D i s t . , J a c k s o n v i l l e (1950); "Waves and W i n d T i d e s

i n Inland W a t e r s , Lake Okeechobee, F l o r i d a . " U . S. A r m y
Corps of E n g i n e e r s , CW-167, P r o j e c t B u l l e t i n No. 2.

W i e g e l , R. L . and H . L . K i m b e r l y (1950). "Southern Swell Observed

at Oceanside C a l i f o r n i a . " T r a n s . , A G U , V o l . 3 1 , pp. 717-722.

86
 1951

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1951). " R e v i s e d Wave F o r e c a s t i n g Curves and

P r o c e d u r e s . " T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t No. HE-155047, Inst, of
E n g i n e e r i n g R e s e a r c h , Univ. of C a l i f o r n i a , B e r k e l e y , 28 pp.
(Unpublished)

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . and E . K . R i c e (1951). "The Generation and Decay

of W i n d Waves i n a S i x t y - f o o t Channel. " T e c h . R e p o r t HE 116-327,
Inst, of E n g i n e e r i n g R e s e a r c h , Univ. of C a l i f o r n i a , B e r k e l e y .
3 pp. (Unpublished)

U. S. A r m y C o r p s of E n g i n e e r s (1951). "Waves i n Inland R e s e r v o i r s,

F o r t Peck, M o n t a n a . " C W - 1 6 4 , P r o j . B u l l e t i n N o . ' 1, F o r t
P e c k D i s t . , Montana

W e i b u l l , Waloddi (1951). " A S t a t i s t i c a l D i s t r i b u t i o n F u n c t i o n of Wide

Applicability. " ASME Applied Mechanics Div. , Paper presented
at A S M E Annual M e e t i n g , 1951.

1952

B e a r d , L . R. (1952). " S t a t i s t i c a l Methods i n H y d r o l o g y . " O f f i c e of

the Chief of E n g i n e e r s , Dept. o f t h e A r m y , J u l y 1952, 35 pp.

B r a c e l i n , P. (1952). " O b s e r v i n g , F o r e c a s t i n g and R e p o r t i n g Ocean

Waves and S u r f . " N a v a l Weather Service ( G r . B r i t a i n ) M e m o
No. 147/52 (Unpublished)

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1952). " R e v i s e d Wave F o r e c a s t i n g R e l a t i o n s h i p s . "

P r o c . , I l n d Conference on Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g , Chap. I , pp. 1-5.

D a r b y s h i r e , J . (1952). " The Generation of Wave s by W i n d . " P r o c ,

R o y a l Society, A215, pp. 299-328. -———

L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s , M . S. (1952). "On the S t a t i s t i c a l D i s t r i b u t i o n of the

Heights of Sea Waves. " J o u r n a l of M a r i n e R e s e a r c h , V o l . X I ,
No. 3, pp. 345-366. ^ ^

Neumann, G e r h a r d (1952). "On Ocean Wave Spectra and a New M e t h o d

of F o r e c a s t i n g W i n d - G e n e r a t e d Sea. " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d ,
U. S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s , T e c h . M e m o No, 43, 42 pp.

P i e r s o n , W, J, , J r , and W. M a r k s (1952). "The P o w e r S p e c t r u m

A n a l y s i s of Ocean Wave R e c o r d s . " T r a n s . , A G U , V o l . . 33,
pp. 834-844.

P u t z , R. B . (1952). " S t a t i s t i c a l D i s t r i b u t i o n f o r Ocean Waves, " T r a n s . ,

A G U , V o l . 33, No. 5, pp. 685-692. —^

87
1953
A r a k a w a , H . and K . Suda {1953). " A n a l y s i s of W i n d s , W i n d Waves, and
Swell over the Sea to the East of Japan d u r i n g the Typhoon of
September 26, 1935." M o n t h l y Weather Review, U . S. Weather
Bureau, V o l . 8 1 , pp. 31-37.

Hamada, T . H ; , M i t s u y a s u , and M . H a s e ( 1 9 5 3 ) i " A n E x p e r i m e n t a l Study

of W i n d E f f e c t upon Water Surface. " Report of T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
T e c h n i c a l R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e , T o k y o , 22 pp.

I c h i y e , T . (1953). "On the E f f e c t of Waves upon the V e r t i c a l D i s t r i b u t i c n

of Water T e m p e r a t u r e s . " Records of Oceanographic W o r k s i n
Japan, New Series 1, No. 1, pp. 63-70.

Kaplan, K . (1953). " A n a l y s i s of M o v i n g Fetches f o r Wave F o r e c a s t i n g . ' '

Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s , T e c h .
M e m o No. ;35.

U . S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s (1953). " F i r s t I n t e r i m Report on Vfind

and Wave I n v e s t i g a t i o n s , Denison Dam (Lake T e x o m o ) , Red
R i v e r , Texas and Oklahoma. " U . S. A r m y Eng. D i s t . , T u l s a ,
Oklahoma.

W a t t e r s , J. K . A . (1953). " D i s t r i b u t i o n of Height i n Ocean Waves. "

New Zealand J o u r n a l of Science and Technology, Sect. B . , V o l ,
34, pp. , 408-422.

1954

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1954). "Generation of Wind Waves i n Shallow

W a t e r . " B e a c h E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e ï s ,
T e c h . M e m o No. 5 1 .

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L - and R. O. R e i d (1954). "Changes i n Wave Height

due to B o t t o m F r i c t i o n , P e r c o l a t i o n and R e f r a c t i o n . " Beach
E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . , S., A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s , T e c h . M e m o No.
4 5 . , 36 pp.

D a r l i n g t o n , C. .R. (1954). "The D i s t r i b u t i o n of Wave Heights' and P e r i o d s

i n Ocean Waves. " Quart. Jour, of Roy. M e t . S o c , 80, pp.
619-626.
M i c h e , R. (1954). " P r o p r i e t e s des T r a i n s D'onde Oceaniques et de
L a b o r a t ó r i o . " COEC-135.

S a v i l l e , ' T h o r n d i k e , J r . (1954)., "The E f f e c t of F e t c h W i d t h on Wave

Generation. " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of Engin¬
eers, T e c h M e m o No. 70, 9 pp.

88
1955

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . a n d W . C. Thompson (1955), " D i s s i p a t i o n of Wave

E n e r g y on Continental Shelf, Gulf of M e x i c o . " Tech. R e p o r t No.
5 5 - 9 T , Texas A & M Research Foundation.

D a r b y s h i r e , J. (1955). " A n I n v e s t i g a t i o n of S t o r m Waves i n the N o r t h

A t l a n t i c Ocean. " P r o c . , Roy. S o c , A 230, pp. 299-328.

P i e r s o n , W. J. , J r . , G. Neumann and R. W. James (1955). " O b s e r v i n g

and F o r e c a s t i n g Ocean Waves by Means of Wave Spectra and
S t a t i s t i c s . " H y d r o g r a p h i c O f f i c e P u b l i c a t i o n No. 603, U . S.
Department of the Navy, 284 pp.

Sibul, Oswald (1955). " L a b o r a t o r y Study of the Generation of Wind Waves

i n Shallow W a t e r . " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of
E n g i n e e r s , Tech. M e m o No. 72, 35 pp.

Titov, (1955). " W i n d Waves on the Oceans and Seas. " Leningrad
( i n Russian)

Unoki, S. and M . Nakano (1955). "On the Ocean Waves at H a c h i j o I s l a n d . "

P a p e r s i n M e t e o r o l o g y and Geophysics, V o l . V I , No. 1, Tokyo,
pp. 63-86.

U. S. A r m y Engineer D i s t . , J a c k s o n v i l l e (1955). "Waves and W i n d Tides

i n Shallow Lakes and R e s e r v o i r s . " S u m m a r y Report, P r o j e c t
CW-167, U . S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s .

W i l s o n , , B . W. (1955). " G r a p h i c a l A p p r o a c h to the F o r e c a s t i n g of Waves

i n M o v i n g Fetches. " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of
E n g i n e e r s , T e c h . M e m o No. 73, 31 pp.

1956

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1956). "Wave F o r e c a s t i n g Relationships f o r the

Gulf of M e x i c o . " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of
E n g i n e e r s , T e c h . M e m o No, 84, 28 pp.

Cox, C. and W. H . M u n k (1956). "Slopes of the Sea Surface Deduced f r o m

Photographs of Sun G l i t t e r , " B u l l e t i n of the Scripps I n s t i t u t i o n
of Oceanography, L a J o l l a C a l i f . , V o l . 6, No. 9, pp. 401-488.

Jasper, N . H . (1956). " S t a t i s t i c a l D i s t r i b u t i o n P a t t e r n s of Ocean Waves

and of Wave-Induced Ship Stresses and M o t i o n s , w i t h E n g i n e e r i n g
A p p l i c a t i o n s . " P r o c , 1956 Annual M e e t i n g of S o c of N a v a l
A r c h i t e c t s and M a r i n e Engineers-

89
K r y l o v , Y u M . (1956). ' " S t a t i s t i c a l T h e o r y and C a l c u l a t i o n of "Wind Waves
at Sea. " V o l . I , T r u d y COIN, 33 (45).

L a w f o r d , A . L . aid V . F . C. V e l e y (1956). "Changes i n the R e l a t i o n s h i p

between W i n d and Water M o v e m e n t at H i g h e r W i n d Speeds. "
T r a n s . , A G U , . V o l . 37, pp. 691-693.
} < .

Mandelbaum', Hugo (.1956). "Evidence f o r a C r i t i c a l W i n d V e l o c i t y f o r

A i r - S e a Boundary P r o c e s s e s . " T r a n s . , A G U , V o l . 37, pp. 685-690.

R o l l , H . and G. F i s c h e r (1956).: "Eine K r i t i s c h e Bemenkung Zum' Neumann-

Spektrum der Seeganger. " Deut. H y d r . Zs., , 9, pp. 9-14.

Shuleikin, V . V . (1956). " T h e o r y of Sea Waves. " T r u d y M o r s k o g o

. G i d r o f i z . I n s t . A k a d . Nauk. S. S. S. R. , V o l . 9, 1 4 1 p p .

U r s e l l , F . (1956). "Wave Generation by W i n d . " Surveys i n MeOhanics.

Cambridge Univ. P r e s s , Chap. 7.

1957 •
B r e t s c h n e i d e r , , g . L- (1957). " H u r r i c a n e Design Wave P r a c t i c e s . " P r o c . ,
ASCE, J o u r n a l of W a t e r w a y s and H a r b o r s D i v . , Paper 1238, WW 2,
pp. 1238-1 to 33..

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1957). " R e v i s i o n i n Wave Forecasting': Deep and

Shallow W a t e r . " P r o c . , V l t h Conf. on Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g , pp.
30-67.

Chase, J. , L . J. Cote, W. M a r k s , E. M e h r , W. J. P i e r s o n , J r . , F . C.
Ronne, G, Stephenson, R. C. V e t t e r and R. G. Walden (1957).
"The D i r e c t i o n a l S p e c t r u m of a W i n d - G e n e r a t e d Sea as D e t e r m i n e d
f r o m Data obtained f r o m the Stereo Wave G b s e r v a t i o n P r o j e c t . "
T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t , R e s e a r c h D i v . , College of E n g i n e e r i n g , New
York University.

C r a p p e r , G. H . (1957). " A n E x a c t Solution f o r P r o g r e s s i v e C a p i l l a r y

Waves of A r b i t r a r y A m p l i t u d e . " J o u r n a l of F l u i d M e c h a n i c s ,
È(6)'532.

I j i m a , T a k e s h i (1957). "The P r o p e r t i e s of Ocean Waves bn the P a c i f i c

Coast and the Japan Sea Coast of Japan. " R e p o r t No. 25, The
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n T e c h n i c a l I n s t i t u t e , Tokyo.

M i l e s , J. W. (1957). "On the Generation of Surface Waves by Shear F l o w s .

J o u r n a l of F l u i d M e c h a n i c s , V o l . 3, P a r t 2, pp. 185-204.

P h i l l i p s , O. M-. (1957). " O n the Generation of Waves by T u r b u l e n t Wind. "

J o u r n a l of F l u i d M e c h a n i c s , V o l . 2, P a r t 5; pp. 417-445.

90
U . S. Weather B u r e a u (1957). "Standard P r o j e c t H u r r i c a n e Isotachs,
Galveston A r e a . " M e m o , H U R 7 - 4 7 , H y d r o m e t e o r o l o g i c a l
Section.
W i l s o n , B . W. (1957). " H u r r i c a n e Wave S t a t i s t i c s f o r the Gulf of M e x i c o . "
'Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U . S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s , T e c h . M e m o
No. 98, 61 pp.

1958

B l a c k m a n , R. B . and j . W. T u k e y (1958). The M e a s u r e m e n t of P o w e r

Spectra f r o m the P o i n t of V i e w of Communications E n g i n e e r i n g .
D o v e r , New Y o r k
B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1958). " R e v i s i o n s i n Wave F o r e c a s t i n g : Deep and
Shallow W a t e r . " P r o c . , V l t h Conference on Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g ,
Chap. 3, pp. 30-67:

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1958). " E n g i n e e r i n g Aspects of H u r r i c a n e Surge. "

P r o c . , A m e r . M e t . Soc. T e c h . Conf. on H u r r i c a n e s , M i a m i
Beach, F l o r i d a

K r y l o v , Yu M . (1958). " S t a t i s t i c a l T h e o r y and C a l c u l a t i o n of W i n d Waves

at Sea." V o l . 2, T r u d y COIN, V o l . 42.

1959
B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1959). "Wave V a r i a b i l i t y and Wave Spectra f o r
W i n d Generated G r a v i t y Waves. " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d , U , S.
A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s , T e c h . M e m o No. 118, 192 pp.

B u r l i n g , R. W. (1959). " T h e S p e c t r u m of Waves at Short Fetches. "

Dt. H y d r o g . Z . Band 12, H e f t 2, pp. 45-117.

P i e r s o n , W. J. , J r . (1959). " A Note on the G r o w t h of the Spectrum of

W i n d - G e n e r a t e d G r a v i t y Waves as D e t e r m i n e d by Nonlinear
C o n s i d e r a t i o n s . " J o u r n a l of G e o p h y s i c a l R e s e a r c h , A G U , V o l .
64, No. 8, pp. 1007-1011.

Shuleikin, V . V . (1959). " P h y s i c a l P r i n c i p l e s of F o r e c a s t i n g W i n d Waves

i n the Ocean. " I g r . A k a d . Nauk, S. S. S. R. , Ser. Geofys. V o l . 5,
pp. 710-724.

I960
Gumbel, E . J . ( I 9 6 0 ) , " B i v a r i a t e Exponential D i s t r i b u t i o n s . " Jc-n.r.
of A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s n . , V o l . 55, pp. 698-707.

M i l e s , J. W. ( I 9 6 0 ) . " O n the Generation of Surface Waves by T u r b u l e n t

Shear F l o w s . " J o u r n a l of F l u i d M e c h a n i c s , V o l . 7, P t . 3, pp.
469-478.

91
Schooley, A l l e n H. ( I 9 6 0 ) . " R e l a t i o n s h i p between Surface Slope, A v e r a g e
Facet Size, and F a c e t F l a t n e s s T o l e r a n c e of a W i n d - D i s t u r b e d
Water S u r f a c e . " J o u r n a l of Geophysical R e s e a r c h , V o l . 66, No. 1,
pp. 157-162. ~ "

W i e g e l , R. L . ( I 9 6 0 ) . " W i n d Waves and S w e l l . " P r o c . , V l l t h Conference

on Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g , Chap. 1.

W i l s o n , B . W . ( I 9 6 0 ) . "Deep Water Wave Generation by M o v i n g Wind

S y s t e m s . " F r o c . , A S C E , V o l . 87, WW2, M a y 1961, pp. 113-141.
1961

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L,i. . ( 1 9 6 l ) . " A O n e - D i m e n s i o n a l G r a v i t y Wave S p e c t r u m . "

Paper presented at Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra.

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . ('1961). "Appendix: Wave Spectra f r o m H u r r i c a n e

Donna, 1959. " P a p e r p r e s e n t e d at Conference on Ocean Wave
Spectra.i ,

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1961). " D i s c u s s i o n of ' C o r n p a r i s o n of O n e - D i m e n s i o n a l

Wave Spectra R e c o r d e d i n the G e r m a n Bight w i t h V a r i o u s " T h e o r e t i c a l "
Spectra. ' by Walden. " D i s c u s s i o n presented at Conference on Ocean
Wave Spectra.

C a l d w e l l , J. M . a n d ! , . C. W i l l i a m s (1961). "The Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d ' s

Wave Spectriom A n a l y z e r and I t s P u r p o s e . " P a p e r presented at
Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra.

C a r t w r i g h t , D. E . (1961). " P h y s i c a l Oceanography. " Science P r o g r e s s ,

V o l . X L I X , No. 196, pp. 681-693. ' ~

H a s s e l m a n , K . (1961). "On the N o n l i n e a r E n e r g y T r a n s f e r i n a Wave

Spectrum, " Paper p r e s e n t e d at Conference on Ocean Wave
Spectra.

K i t a i g o r o d s k i , S. A . , (1961). " A p p l i c a t i o n of the T h e o r y of S i m i l a r i t y

to the A n a l y s i s of W i n d - G e n e r a t e d Wave M o t i o n as a Stochastic
P r o c e s s . " I Z V , Geophys. S e r . , pp. 105-117.

K o r n e v a , L . A . (1961). " S t a t i s t i c a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the V a r i a b i l i t y

of Wave E l e m e n t s i n the Shore Zo ne of a Deep Sea. " T r a n s . ,
M a r i n e H y d r o p h y s i c a l I n s t . , USSR A c a d e m y of Science, V o l .
X X I I I , pp. 3 5 - 5 1 .

K o r v i n - K r o u k o v s k y , B . V . (1961). T h e o r y of Seakeeping. The Society

of N a v a l A r c h i t e c t s and M a r i n e E n g i n e e r s , New Y o r k , N . Y.

92
L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s , M . S. , D. E , C a r t w r i g h t and N . D . Smith (1961).
"Observations of the D i r e c t i o n a l S p e c t r u m of Sea Waves using the
M o t i o n s of a F l o a t i n g Buoy. " P a p e r presented at Conference on
Ocean Wave Spectra.

M u n k , W. ( I 9 6 I ) . " D i s c u s s i o n of ' A P l e a f o r the Rectangular L a g Window'

by N . F . B a r b e r . " D i s c u s s i o n presented at Conference on Ocean
Wave Spectra.

P h i l l i p s , O. M . (1961). " T h e Dynamics of Random F i n i t e A m p l i t u d e

G r a v i t y Waves. " Paper presented at Conference on Ocean Wave
Spectra.

P i e r s o n , W. J. , J r . (1961). "Some N o n - l i n e a r P r o p e r t i e s of L o n g -
C r e s t e d P e r i o d i c Waves w i t h Lengths near 2. 44 C e n t i m e t e r s . "
J o u r n a l of Geophysical Research, A G U , V o L 66, No, 1,
pp. 163-179.

P i e r s o n , W. J. , J r . and G. Neumann (1961). " K n o w n and Unknown

P r o p e r t i e s of the F r e q u e n c y S p e c t r u m of a W i n d - G e n e r a t e d
Sea, " P a p e r presented at Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra.

U . S. A r m y C o r p s of E n g i n e e r s (1961). "Shore P r o t e c t i o n , P l a n n i n g
and D e s i g n . " Beach E r o s i o n B o a r d T e c h . R e p o r t No. 4 ( B E B
T . R . 4), Rev. 1961.

Walden, H . ( I 9 6 I ) . " C o m p a r i s o n of O n e - D i m e n s i o n a l Wave Spectra

Recorded i n the G e r m a n Bight w i t h V a r i o u s ' T h e o r e t i c a l ' Spectra. "
Paper presented at Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra.

Walden, H . and J . P i e s t (1961). " V e r g l e i c h s m e s s u n g e n des Seeganges. "

Deuts. W e t t . Seewetteramt N r . 30, H a m b u r g , G e r m a n y .

1962

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . , H . L . C r u t c h e r , J . D a r b y s h i r e , G. Neumann,
W. J. P i e r s o n , J r . , H . Walden and B . W. W i l s o n (1962). "Data
f o r High Wave Conditions Observed by the OWS 'Weather R e p o r t e r '
i n December 1959." Deut. H y d r o . Z e i t . Band 15, H e f t 6, pp.
243-255.

B a r b e r , N . F . and M , J. T u c k e r (1962). " K i n e m a t i c s of Waves. " The

Sea, John W i l e y &: Sons, Chap, 19, pp. 664-699.

H i l l , M . N . ( E d . )(1962). The Sea. John W i l e y & Sons, New Y o r k , N . Y.

K i t a i g o r o d s k i , S. A . and S. S. S t r e k a l o v (1962). " C o n t r i b u t i o n to a-

A n a l y s i s of the Spectra of W i n d - C a u s e d Wave A c t i o n . " I . I Z V
Geophys., pp. 1221-1228.

93
P i c k e t t , R. L . (1962). " A Series of Wave P o w e r Spectra. " U . S. N a v a l
Oceanographic O f f i c e Report No. 0 - 6 5 - 6 2 (Unpublished M a n u -
script.

Schellenberger, G. (1962). "Untersuchungen uber W i n d w e l l e n auf einem

Binnensee. " Inst, f u r Phys. H y d r o , der Deutschen A k a d e m i e
der Winenschaften zu B e r l i n .

1963,

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . (1963). " M o d i f i c a t i o n of Wave Spectra over the

Continental Shelf. " P r o c . , V l l l t h Conference on Coastal E n g i n -
e e r i n g , Chap. 2, pp"! 17-33.

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L . and J . I . C o l l i n s (1963). " P r e d i c t i o n of H u r r i c a n e

Surge: A n I n v e s t i g a t i o n f o r Corpus C h r i s t i , Texas, and V i c i n i t y . "
NESCO T e c h . R e p o r t SN-120.

D a r b y s h i r e , M . (1963). "Wave M e a s u r e m e n t s made by the N a t i o n a l

I n s t i t u t e of Oceanography, " P r o c . , 1961 Conf. on Ocean
Wave Spectra, P r e n t i c e - H a l l , pp. 111-132.

Hamada, T o k u i c h i (1963). " A n E x p e r i m e n t a l Study of Development of

Wind Waves. " R e p o r t No. 2, P o r t and H a r b o u r T e c h n i c a l R e s e a r c h
I n s t i t u t e , Yokosuka, Japan.

Hasselmann, K . (1961). " O n the N o n l i n e a r E n e r g y T r a n s f e r i n a Wave

S p e c t r u m . " P r o c . , 1961 Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra,
Prentice -Hall.

I j i m a , T a k e s h i (1963). " A p p r o x i m a t e E s t i m a t i o n s of C o r r e l a t i o n Co-

e f f i c i e n t s between Wave Height and P e r i o d of Shallow W a t e r Wir-d
W a v e s . " P r o c . , V l l l t h Conference on Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g ,
Chap. 1, pp. 1-16.

K i t a i g o r o d s k i , S. A . and S. S. S t r e k a l o v (1963), " O n the A n a l y s i s of

Spectra of W i n d - G e n e r a t e d Wave M o t i o n . " I I . I Z V . Geophys,
Ser No. 8, pp. 1240-1250.

L o n g u e t - H i g g i n s , M . S. , D.. E . C a r t w r i g h t and N . D . S m i t h (1963),

"Observations of the D i r e c t i o n a l Spectrum of Sea Waves Using
the M o t i o n s of a F l o a t i n g Buoy. " P r o c . , 1961 Conference on
Ocean Wave Spectra, P r e n t i c e - H a l l , pp. 111-132.

M o s k o w i t z , L . , W. J . P i e r s o n , J r . , and E . M e h r (1963). "Wave Spectra

Estima.ted f r o m Wave R e c o r d s Obtained by the OWS 'Weather
E x p l o r e r ' and the OWS 'Weather R e p o r t e r ' . " T e c h . R e p o r t ni^-S,
New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y .

94
1

Munk, W. H . (1963). D i s c u s s i o n at the 1961 Conference on Ocean Wave

Spectra. P r o c . , Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra, P r e n t i c e -
Hall,, pp. T 3 Ï Ï ^ 6 0 .

Ocean Wave Spectra (1963). P r o c . of the 1961 Conference i n Easton,

M a r y l a n d . P r e n t i c e - H a l l . See 1961 l i s t i n g s f o r i n d i v i d u a l papers,

P i e r s o n , W, J. , J r , ( 1963). " G r a v i t y Waves. " T r a n s . , A G U , V o l . 44,

No. 2.

P i e r s o n , W. J. , J r . , and L i o n e l M o s k o w i t z (1963). " A P r o p o s e d Spectral

F o r m f o r F u l l y Developed W i n d Seas Based on the S i m i l a r i t y
T h e o r y of K i t a i g o r o d s k i . " T e c h . R e p o r t 63-12, New Y o r k Univ.

W i e g e l , R. L . (1963). "Some E n g i n e e r i n g Aspects of Wave Spectra. "

P r o c . o f t h e 1961 Conference on Ocean Wave Spectra, P r e n t i c e -
H a l l , Chap. V . , pp. 309-321.

W i l s o n , B . W. (1963). "Deep Water Wave Generation by M o v i n g Wind

S y s t e m s . " T r a n s . , A S C E , V o l . 128, Paper 3416, P a r t I V ,
pp. 104-148.

W i l s o n , B . W. (1963). " N u m e r i c a l P r e d i c t i o n of Ocean Waves i n the N o r t h

A t l a n t i c f o r December 1959." NESCO T e c h . R e p o r t S N - 7 7 - 2 ,
C o n t r a c t Nonr - 3673(00),

1964

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C, L . a n d J . I . C o l l i n s (1964). " D e s i g n Sea State Study —

P r o j e c t M o h o l e . " NESCO T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t SN-187.

B r e t s c h n e i d e r , C. L , (1964). "The A s h Wednesday East Coast S t o r m ,

M a r c h 5-8, 1962: A Hindcast of Events, Causes and E f f e c t s , "
Paper p r e s e n t e d at I X t h Conference on Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g ,
L i s b o n , P o r t u g a l , A l s o published as NESCO T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t
SN-134-4,

D r o n k e r s , J, J, (1964), T i d a l Computations i n R i v e r s and H a r b o r s ,

N o r t h - H o l l a n d P u b l i s h i n g Co, , A m s t e r d a m , The N e t h e r l a n d s ,

G e l c i , R. , E. D e v i l l a z and P . C h a v y ( 1 9 6 4 ) . " E v o l u t i o n de L ' e t a t de

l a M e r : C a l c u l N u m e r i q u e des A d v e c t i o n s . " M i n i s t è r e des
T r a v a u x P u b l i c s des T r a n s p o r t s S e c r e t a r i a t General a 1'Aviation
Civile.

Goodknight, R. C. a n d T . L . R u s s e l l (1964), " I n v e s t i g a t i o n of the

Statistics of Wave H e i g h t s . " J o u r n a l of W a t e r w a y s and H a r b o r s
D i v . , A S C E , V o l . 89, No. W W 2 , pp. 29-54.

95
Hamada, T o k u i c h i (1964). "On the f"^ L a w of W i n d - G e n e r a t e d Waves.
R e p o r t NÓ.' 6, P o r t and H a r b o u r T e c h n i c a l R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e ,
Yokosuka, Japan.

H i n o , M i k i o (1964). "Studies of the Wave Generation by W i n d and the

Roughness of the Sea. " P a r t I , P r o c . , X t h Congress on Coastal
E n g i n e e r i n g , Oct. 1963, Japan.

M a r i n e Technology Society (1964). T r a n s a c t i o n s of the 1964 Buoy

Technology S y m p o s i u m . Washington, D. C. ~

T u c k e r , M . J. (1964), " M e a s u r i n g Devices f o r Waves, and C u r r e n t s . "

L e c t u r e p r e s e n t e d at N U F F I C I n t e r n a t i o n a l Summer Course,
L u n t e r e n ; •The N e t h e r l a n d s .

96
 D I S T R I B U T I O N LIST

ADDRESSEE NO. OF COPIES

Chief of Naval R e s e a r c h 2
A T T N : Geography B r a n c h
O f f i c e of N a v a l R e s e a r c h
Washington, D . C. , 20360

Chief of N a v a l R e s e a r c h 2
A T T N : Geophysics B r a n c h
O f f i c e of N a v a l R e s e a r c h
Washington, D . C. , 20360

Defense Documentation Center 20

C a m e r o n Station
A l e x a n d r i a , V i r g i n i a , 22314

D i r e c t o r , Naval R e s e a r c h L a b o r a t o r y 6
ATTN: Technical Information Officer
Washington, D . C. , 20390

Commanding O f f i c e r 1
O f f i c e of N a v a l R e s e a r c h B r a n c h O f f i c e
1030 East Green Street
Pasadena 1, C a l i f o r n i a

Commanding O f f i c e r 5
O f f i c e of N a v a l R e s e a r c h
Navy #100
F l e e t Post O f f i c e
New Y o r k , New Y o r k

Chief of Naval R e s e a r c h 1
A T T N : Code 416
O f f i c e of N a v a l R e s e a r c h
Washington, D . C. , 20360

Defense I n t e l l i g e n c e Agency 1
DIAAP-1E4
Department of Defense
Washington 25, D. C.

The Oceanographer 1
U. S. N a v a l Oceanographic O f f i c e
Washington, D. C. , 20390

Director 2
Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g R e s e a r c h Center
U. S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s
5201 L i t t l e F a l l s Road, N . W .
Washington, D . C. , 20016
ADDRESSEE NQ. QF CQPIES

D r . R i c h a r d J. Russell 2
Coastal Studies Institute
L o u i s i a n a State University
Baton Rouge 3, Louisiana

D r . Charles B . H i t c h c o c k 1
A m e r i c a n Geographical Society
Broadway at 156th Street
New Y o r k 32, New Y o r k

Assistant D i r e c t o r for Research 1

and Development ,
U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey
D e p a r t m e n t of C o m m e r c e
Washington 25, D. C.

Director
N a t i o n a l Oceanographic Data Center
Washington 25, D; G. .

Robert L . M i l l e r
Department of Geology
U n i v e r s i t y of Chicago
Chicago 37, I l l i n o i s

Director
M a r i n e Sciences D e p a r t m e n t
U. S. N a v a l Oceanographic O f f i c e
Washington, D . C. , 20390

P r o f , F r a n c i s P , Shepard
Scripps I n s t i t u t e of Oceanography
La Jolla, California

Dr. Maurice Ewing 1

L a m o n t Geological O b s e r v a t o r y
P a l i s a d e s , New Y o r k

Prof. Filip Hjulstrom 1

Geografiska Institutionen
Uppsala U n i v e r s i t e t
Uppsala, Sweden

M i s s C. A . M . K i n g 1
L e c t u r e r i n Geography
U n i v e r s i t y of N o t t i n g h a m
N o t t i n g h a m , England
ADDRESSEE NO. O F COPIES

D r . G i f f o r d C. E w i n g
Scripps I n s t i t u t e of Oceanography-
La Jolla, California

D r . V . Henry-
Marine Institute
Universit-y- of Georgia
Sapelo I s l a n d , Georgia

Coastal Studies I n s t i t u t e 2
L o u i s i a n a State Universit-y-
Baton Rouge 3, L o u i s i a n a

M r . M„ P. O ' B r i e n 1
Wave R e s e a r c h Laborator-y
Universit-y- of C a l i f o r n i a
Berkele-y 4, C a l i f o r n i a

M r . Joseph M . C a l d w e l l
Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g R e s e a r c h Center
U. S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s
5201 L i t t l e F a l l s Road, N . W ,
Washington, D. C. , 20016

Oceanographic P r e d i c t i o n D i v i s i o n
U. S. Naval Oceanographic O f f i c e
Washington, D . C , , 20390

U. S. Naval A i r Development Center

Johnsville, Pennsylvania

C h a i r m a n , D e p a r t m e n t of M e t e o r o l o g y
and Oceanography
New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y
U n i v e r s i t y Heights
New Y o r k 53, New Y o r k

Director, Arctic Research Laboratory

Barrow- Alaska

Dr. H. Lundgren
Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g L a b o r a t o r y
T e c h n i c a l U n i v e r s i t y of D e n m a r k
(Öster Voldgade 10
Copenhagen K , D e n m a r k

Dr. Per Bruun

Coastal E n g i n e e r i n g L a b o r a t o r y
U n i v e r s i t y of F l o r i d a
Gainesville, F l o r i d a
 ADDRESSEE NO. O F C O P I E S

P h y s i c a l Oceanography Section
U. S. Navy E l e c t r o n i c s L a b o r a t o r y
San Diego 52, C a l i f o r n i a

F l u i d Mechanics Division
N a t i o n a l B u r e a u of Standards
Washington, D . C.

Chief, B u r e a u of Y a r d s and Docks

A T T N : R e s e a r c h D i v i s i o n , Code 70
D e p a r t m e n t o f t h e Navy
Washington, D. C. , 20390

Commanding O f f i c e r and D i r e c t o r
David T a y l o r M o d e l B a s i n
Washington, D . C, , 20390
ATTN: Library

U. S. N a v a l Oceanographic O f f i c e
Washington, D. C. , 20390
A T T N : L i b r a r y (Code 1640)

D i r e c t o r , Waterways E x p e r i m e n t Station
U. S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s
Vicksburg, Mississippi

D r . Garbis H . Keulegan
Waterways E x p e r i m e n t Station
U. S. A r m y C o r p s of E n g i n e e r s
Vicksburg, Mississippi

Commanding O f f i c e r and D i r e c t o r
U. S. Naval C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g L a b o r a t o r y
P o r t Hueneme, C a l i f o r n i a

Commanding O f f i c e r
Naval R a d i o l o g i c a l Defense L a b o r a t o r y
San F r a n c i s c o , C a l i f o r n i a

Chief, B u r e a u of Ships
D e p a r t m e n t of the Navy
Washington, D. C, , 20360
A T T N : Code 373

Director 1
Woods Hole Oceanographic I n s t i t u t e
Woods H o l e , M a s s a c h u s e t t s
ADDRESSEE NO. O F COPIES

D r . W a r r e n C. Thompson 1
Dept. of M e t e o r o l o g y and Oceanography
U. S, Naval P o s t - g r a d u a t e School
Monterey, California

Commanding O f f i c e r 2
U. S. Navy M i n e Defense L a b o r a t o r y
Panama C i t y , F l o r i d a

Wave R e s e a r c h L a b o r a t o r y 1
U n i v e r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a
B e r k e l e y 4, C a l i f o r n i a

Director, Hydrodynamics Laboratory 1

Massachusetts I n s t i t u t e of Technology
C a m b r i d g e , Massachusetts

Head, Department of Oceanography 1

U n i v e r s i t y of Washington
Seattle 5, Washington

Dept. of Oceanography and M e t e o r o l o g y 2

Texas A & M U n i v e r s i t y
College Station, Texas

O f f i c e , Chief of E n g i n e e r s 1
U. S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s
R m 2031, G r a v e l l y P o i n t
Washington, D. C.
A T T N : M r . C h a r l e s E . Lee

O f f i c e , Chief of E n g i n e e r s 1
U. S. A r m y Corps of E n g i n e e r s
R m 1306, G r a v e l l y P o i n t
Washington, D. C.
A T T N : M r . A l b e r t L . Cochran

Registrar 2
NUFFIC
27 M o l e n s t r a a t
The Hague, the Netherlands