Sie sind auf Seite 1von 53

Final review: post-balance sheet

period, provisions, contingencies,


letter or representation

Chapter 14
UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this chapter you should be


able to:
• Describe the nature of the work the auditor
performs immediately prior to preparation of
the audit report.
• Detail the specific procedures the auditor
performs in respect of post-balance sheet
events.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
LEARNING OBJECTIVES CONT'D

• Explain the nature of provisions, contingent


liabilities and contingent assets, and detail
audit procedures in respect of them.
• Describe the final working paper review
procedures performed by the auditor prior to
forming the final audit opinion.
• Explain the nature and role of the
management letter of representation, in the
context of the evidence search.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.533

Stage 18 of the audit process is when auditors


pull together evidence gathered and conclusions
arrived at earlier to form a view on the financial
statements as a whole.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.533 CONT'D

They also perform the following tasks:


(a) post-balance sheet date work;
(b) audit work on provisions and contingencies;
(c) final working sheet review;
(d) reviews of validity of the going-concern
concept;
(e) review work of other auditors.
Finally, they obtain the management letter of
representation.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.533 CONT'D
Post-balance sheet events
This is when auditors routinely assess:
• debtors collectability;
• NRV of stocks;
• useful lives of fixed assets;
• potential unrecorded liabilities.
Auditors review the post-balance sheet period to
ascertain whether any matters should be reflected
in the accounts or disclosed in the audit report.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.534

The period after the balance sheet date may be


subdivided into periods as follows.

Each period has its own characteristics and


problems for auditors:

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.534 CONT'D

(1) between balance sheet date and completion of


draft accounts.
(2) from completion of draft accounts to completion
of audit fieldwork.
(3) from completion of audit fieldwork to date of
issuing financial statements.
(4) after the financial statements have been issued
but before the AGM;
(5) after the AGM.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.537–538

Events occurring in periods (1) and (2) are known


by both directors and auditors as they occur before
the signing of the accounts and completion of audit
fieldwork.
Regarding (3), auditors, becoming aware of a
material event, establish if financial statements
need amendment, discuss with directors and
consider the implications for their report.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.536–538 CONT'D

Regarding (4), auditors have no obligation to


perform procedures or make enquiries, but if they
become aware of an event that might have caused
them to issue a different report, they consider
whether the financial statements need amendment,
discuss with directors and consider the implications
for their report.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.536–538 CONT'D

Regarding (5), auditors will not be expected to be


aware of an event in the period after the AGM, but,
if they do obtain knowledge of it, the matter should
be discussed with the directors and action, if any,
they intend to take, determined.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
Period Covered by Subsequent
Events Review
Client’s ending Audit Date client
balance sheet report issues financial
date date statements

12-31-07 3-11-08 3-26-08

Period to which review for Period for


subsequent events applies processing
the financial
statements
Review for Subsequent Events
and Discovery of Facts
Client’s ending Audit Date client
balance sheet report issues financial
date date statements

12-31-07 3-11-08 3-26-08

Period to which Period for Period in which


review for processing subsequent
subsequent the financial discovery of
events applies statements facts is made
Types of Subsequent Events

 Those that have a direct effect


on the financial statements
and require adjustment
 Those that have do not have a direct
effect on the financial statements
but for which disclosure is required
Requiring Adjustment

 Declaration of bankruptcy by a customer


with an accounts receivable balance
 Settlement of a litigation at an amount
different from the amount recorded
on the books
 Disposal of equipment not being used in
operations at a price below the current
book value
 Sale of investments at a price below
recorded cost
Advisability of Disclosure

 Decline in the market value of securities


held for temporary investment or resale
 Issuance of bonds or equity securities
 Uninsured loss of inventories as a result
of fire
 A merger or an acquisition
Audit Tests

Two categories of audit procedures


for the subsequent events review:
1. Procedures normally integrated as
a part of the verification of year-end
account balances.
2. Procedures performed specifically for
the purpose of discovering events or
transactions that must be recognized
as subsequent events.
Audit Tests

 Inquire of management
 Correspond with attorneys
 Review internal statements prepared
subsequent to the balance sheet date
 Review records prepared subsequent
to the balance sheet date
 Examine minutes issued subsequent
to the balance sheet date
 Obtain a letter of representation
Dual Dating

 The first date is the date for the completion


of field work except for a specific exception

 The second date, which is always later,


deals with the exception
KEY POINTS – p.539

Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent


assets

Some events, occurring either before or after


the balance sheet date, have uncertain outcomes
– provisions and contingencies as defined by
FRS 12.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.540

• Is there a legal or constructive obligation,


the latter evidenced by policies or other
authoritative statements from management in
the past, and whether the company is taking
any action in respect of the event;

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.541

• The auditor should determine if a reliable


estimate be made of the amount of the
obligation. Potential losses from claims may be
particularly difficult to ascertain.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.542

Provisions must be properly disclosed in


accordance with FRS 12, sufficient to enable the
reader to understand the nature of the obligation,
the expected timing of transfers of economic
benefits, and the uncertainties about amount or
timing.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.543

If the event does not give rise to a present


obligation, or there is no probable outflow of
economic benefits or it is not possible to evaluate
the timing and amount of the obligation, it may be
treated as a contingency.
FRS 12 and IAS 37 distinguish between
contingent liabilities and contingent assets.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.543 CONT'D

Contingent liability
(a) A possible obligation that arises from past
events and whose existence will be confirmed
only by the occurrence of one or more
uncertain future events not wholly within the
entity’s control.
(b) A present obligation that arises from past
events but is not recognized.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.543 CONT'D

In Part (b) the obligation may not be recognized


for the following reasons:
(i) it is not probable that a transfer of economic
benefits will be required to settle an obligation;
(ii) the amount of the obligation cannot be
measured with sufficient reliability

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.543 CONT'D

Contingent asset
A possible asset that derives from past events
and whose existence will be confirmed only by
the occurrence of one or more uncertain future
events not wholly within the entity’s control.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.543–544

Contingencies, like provisions, are problematic


because of the varying degrees of certainty from
remote to probable. Note that:
(a) directors consider estimates of outcome and
the financial effect of contingencies;
(b) directors review events occurring after the
balance sheet date up to the date of signing
the financial statements;
(c) accounting treatment of a contingency depends
on its expected outcome and nature.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
Likelihood of Occurrence and Financial
Statement Treatment

Likelihood of Financial Statement


Occurrence of Event Treatment
Remote No disclosure
(slight chance) is necessary
Reasonably Footnote disclosure
possible is necessary
Probable Adjust financial statements
(likely to occur) or note disclosure
Auditor’s Concerns

 Pending litigation for patent infringement,


product liability, or other actions
 Income tax disputes
 Product warranties
 Notes receivable discounted
 Guarantees of obligations of others
 Unused balances of outstanding letters of credit
Audit Procedures for Finding Contingencies

Inquire of management about the possibility


of unrecorded contingencies.

Review current and previous years’ internal


revenue reports for income tax settlements.

Review the minutes of directors’ and


stockholders’ meetings for indications of
lawsuits or other contingencies.
Audit Procedures for Finding Contingencies

Analyze legal expenses and review invoices


and statements from legal counsel.

Obtain a letter from each major attorney of the


client as to the status of pending litigation.

Review audit documentation for any information


that may indicate a potential contingency.

Examine letters of credit in force.


KEY POINTS – p.547

Going concern
During the final review period the auditor considers
the validity of assuming that the company is a
going concern.
See also Chapter 17.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.663–664

Directors’ responsibilities include determining


whether a company is a going concern.
Auditors must satisfy themselves that the going-
concern basis is appropriate and disclosures in the
financial statements are sufficient. They should
determine how directors concluded the company
is a going concern, and assess the logic, rationale
and strength of information used.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.664

To do so auditors should:
(i) make enquiries of directors and examine
appropriate available financial information;
(ii) having regard to the future period to which the
directors have paid particular attention, plan and
perform procedures specifically designed to
identify any material matters that could indicate
concern about the entity’s ability to continue as
a going concern.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.667

Indicators that might suggest going-concern


problems are:
• negative cash flows;
• significant losses;
• substantial debts difficult to service;
• substantial overdraft and overdraft limit
exceeded;
• net current liabilities;
• loan repayments or overdraft facilities
renegotiated;

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.667 CONT'D

• reduction in dividends;
• longer creditor payment period;
• company has made employees redundant
and/or has had to reorganize/rationalize its
operations;
• declining market and/or out-of-fashion products;
• forced sale of fixed assets.

Auditors obtain written confirmation of directors’


representations about going concern.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.669

Where financial statements are prepared on a


going-concern basis, the entity is assumed to
continue in existence for the foreseeable future, the
extent of which varies from entity to entity influenced
by the nature of the entity’s business, its business
risk and external influences.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.669 CONT'D

Directors judge what is an appropriate period for


them to look into the future. If this period is less
than one year, additional disclosures in the financial
statements may be required, and the auditors refer
to this in the audit report even where there is little
doubt about going-concern status.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.669 CONT'D

If there is no doubt, neither directors nor auditors


need refer specifically to going concern in the
financial statements or audit report.
However, the Combined Code states that
‘the directors should report that the business
is a going concern, with supporting
assumptions or qualifications as necessary’.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – p.669 CONT'D

Where there are doubts, auditors will consider if


the directors have included sufficient appropriate
disclosures such that the financial statements give
a true and fair view.
If so, they need not issue a qualified audit opinion,
even where there is fundamental uncertainty, but
include an explanatory paragraph on the going-
concern problems, referring to the note disclosure
in the audit report.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.547–548

Audit work to detect post-balance sheet events


and contingencies
(a) determine company procedures to detect
material post-balance sheet events/
contingencies;
(b) examine minutes of meetings: shareholders,
directors and audit/executive committee;
(c) examine management accounts/accounting
records;

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
KEY POINTS – pp.547–548 CONT'D

(d) examine profit and cash flow forecasts;


(e) Enquire of legal department and external legal
representatives
(f) review known risk areas;
(g) review correspondence/memoranda;
(h) confirmation from third parties;
(i) review information in the public domain;
(j) management interviews.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
Final Evidence Accumulation

1. Perform final analytical procedures.


2. Evaluate the going-concern assumption.
3. Obtain a management representation letter.
4. Consider information accompanying the
basic financial statements.
5. Read other information in the annual report.
Management Representation Letter

Purposes of the letter:


1. To impress upon management its responsibility
for the assertions in the financial statements.
2. To remind management of potential misstatements
or omissions in the financial statements.
3. To document the responses from management
to inquiries about various aspects of the audit.
Information Accompanying
Basic Financial Statements

Balance sheet
Income statement Basic Standard
financial auditor’s
Statement of statements report
cash flows
Footnotes
Detailed comparative Information
statements accompanying
basic financial
Statistical data statements
Schedule of
insurance coverage Separate paragraph –
unqualified, qualified,
or disclaimer
Evaluate Results

 Sufficient appropriate evidence


 Evidence supports auditor’s opinion
 Financial statement disclosures
Audit documentation review
Independent review
Summary of evidence evaluation
Evaluating Results and
Reaching Conclusions

Actual audit evidence


(by cycle, account, Evaluate results
and objective) (by account and cycle)

Audit procedures Estimated misstatement


Sample size (by account)
Items to select Achieved audit risk
Timing (by account and cycle)
Evaluating Results and
Reaching Conclusions

Evaluate overall
financial statements
Issue
audit
Estimated misstatement
report
(overall statements)
Achieved audit risk
(overall statements)
Issue the Audit Report

The audit report is the only thing that most


users see in the audit process, and the
consequences of issuing an inappropriate
report can be severe.
Communicate with
the Audit Committee and Management

 Communicate fraud and illegal acts


 Communicate internal control deficiencies
 Other communication with audit committee
 Management letters
FURTHER READING

ISQC 1 – Quality control for firms that perform


audits and reviews of historical financial
information, and other assurance and related
services engagements.

ISA 220 – Quality control for audits of historical


financial information.

ISA 230 – Audit documentation.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning
FURTHER READING CONT'D

ISA 560 – Subsequent events.

ISA 580 – Management representations.

IAS 10 – Events after the balance sheet date.

FRS 12 and IAS 37 – Provisions, contingent


liabilities and assets.

UseAudit
with Process:
The AuditPrinciples, th Edition
Process 4Practice
Use with The and Cases
By Iain Gray
Third Edition & Stuart
by Iain Gray &Manson ISBN 9781844806782
Stuart Manson ISBN 1-86152-946-5
© 2005
2008 Thomson
Cengage Learning

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen