Cse-Sar 2018

Amrita Sai Institute of Science & Technology
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh – 521 180
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAM (TIER II)
FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION
Submitted to
National Board of Accreditation (NBA)
Submitted by
Department of Computer Science & Engineering

Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 521 180
Email: principalasist@gmail.com,
www.amritasai.edu.in, Phone: 0866-2428399
31 October 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Criterion Details
No
PART – A INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION 1
VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL
PART – B 6
OBJECTIVES
1.1 State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute 7
1.2 State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) 7
Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and
1.3 7
disseminated among stakeholders
State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department,
1.4 8
and PEOs of the program
1.5 Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department 11
1.5.1 Justify the academic factors involved in achievement of the PEOs 11
PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING– LEARNING
2 14
PROCESSES
2.1 Program Curriculum 14
State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University
curriculum for attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific
2.1.1 14
Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure-I. Also mention the identified
curricular gaps, if any
State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the
2.1.2 18
attainment of POs and PSOs
2.2 Teaching -Learning Processes 20
2.2.1 Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching &Learning 20
Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and
2.2.2 27
Evaluation
2.2.3 Quality of student projects 31
2.2.4 Initiatives Related to Industry Interaction 40
2.2.5 Initiatives Related to Industry Internship/Summer Training 41
3 COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES 43
Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes
3.1 43
(POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
3.1.1 Course Outcomes(COs) 45
3.1.2 CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 46
Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year
3.1.3 48
courses
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes 52
Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the
3.2.1 52
evaluation of Course Outcome is based
Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to
3.2.2 55
set attainment levels
3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes 59
Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the
3.3.1 attainment of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific 59
Outcomes
3.3.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO 64
4 STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE 66
4.1 Enrolment Ratio 67
Page
Criterion Details
No
4.2 Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program 67
4.2.1 Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study 67
4.2.2 Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study 67
4.3 Academic Performance in Third Year 68
4.4 Academic Performance in Second Year 68
4.5 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship 69
4.6 Professional Activities 69
4.6.1 Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events 69
4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. 70
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study 71
5 FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS 72
5.1 Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) 79
5.2 Faculty Cadre Proportion 80
5.3 Faculty Qualification 81
5.4 Faculty Retention 81
5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning 81
5.6 Faculty as participants in Faculty development/ training activities/STTPs 82
5.7 Research and Development 83
5.7.1 Academic Research 83
5.7.2 Sponsored Research 85
5.7.3 Development activities 85
5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) 86
5.8 Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) 87
5.9 Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. 90
6 FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT 91
6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower 91
Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning
6.2 91
experience in laboratories
6.3 Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance 91
6.4 Project laboratory 94
6.5 Safety measures in laboratories 94
7 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 96
Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs
7.1 96
&PSOs
Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of
7.2 102
Assessment
7.3 Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship 105
7.4 Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program 106
8 FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS 107
8.1 First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) 107
8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses 107
8.3 First Year Academic Performance 107
8.4 Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses 108
Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the
8.4.1 108
evaluation of Course Outcomes of first year is done
8.4.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses 109
8.5 Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses 109
Page
Criterion Details
No
Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if
8.5.1 109
applicable
8.5.2 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs 110
9 STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS 119
9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level 119
9.2 Feedback analysis and reward/corrective measures taken, if any 120
9.3 Feedback on facilities 121
9.4 Self-Learning 122
9.5 Career Guidance, Training, Placement 124
9.6 Entrepreneurship Cell 128
9.7 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities 131
GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL
10 133
RESOURCES
10.1 Organization, Governance and Transparency 133
10.1.1 State the Vision and Mission of the Institute 133
Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies,
10.1.2 133
service rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies
10.1.3 Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism 137
10.1.4 Delegation of financial powers 139
Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous in formation in
10.1.5 140
public domain
10.2 Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level 140
10.2.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 142
10.2.2 Utilization of allocated funds 142
10.2.3 Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website 142
10.3 Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization 142
10.3.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 144
10.3.2 Utilization of allocated funds 144
10.4 Library and Internet 145
10.4.1 Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) 145
10.4.2 Internet 146
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – A
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Computer Science & Engineering
PARTA: Institutional Information
1. Name and Address of the Institution:

Amrita Sai Institute of Science & Technology
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Kanchikacherla Mandal, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh – 521180
2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada Andhra Pradesh - 533001
3. Year of establishment of the Institution:

2007
4. Type of the Institution:
University
Deemed University
Government Aided
Autonomous
Affiliated 
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government
State Government
Government Aided
Self-financing 
Trust 
Society
Section25 Company
Any Other (Please specify)
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 1

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:
Name of the Institution(s) Year of

Establishment Programs of Study Location
N/A N/A N/A N/A
7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:
Year Increase Year of AICTE Accreditation

S No Program Name Intake
of start in Intake Increase Approval Status
Electrical and Electronics Yes - Eligible but not
1 2007 120 60 2009,2010
Engineering 2007 applied
Computer Science and Yes - Applying first
2 2007 60 60 2010
Engineering 2007 time
Electronics and Yes - Applying first
3 2007 120 60 2010, 2012
Communication Engineering 2007 time
Yes - Eligible but not
4 Mechanical Engineering 2011 60 60 2014
2011 applied
Yes - Not eligible for
5 Civil Engineering 2012 60 60 2014
2012 accreditation
Master in Computer -- Yes - Eligible but not
6 2008 60 0
Applications 2008 applied
Master in Business Yes - Eligible but not
7 2009 60 60 2014
Administration 2009 applied
-- Yes - Eligible but not

8 M Tech(Power Electronics) 2012 18 0
2012 applied
M Tech(Computer Science -- Yes - Eligible but not
9 2012 18 0
and Engineering) 2012 applied
M Tech(Structural -- Yes - Not eligible for
10 2014 24 0
Engineering) 2014 accreditation
M Tech (Digital Electronics -- Yes - Not eligible for
11 2014 24 0
& Communication Systems) 2014 accreditation
M Tech(VLSI & Embedded -- Yes - Eligible but not

12 2011 18 0
Systems) 2011 applied
Diploma (Electrical and -- Yes - Not eligible for

13 2014 60 0
Electronics Engineering) 2014 accreditation
Diploma(Mechanical -- Yes - Not eligible for

14 2014 60 0
Engineering) 2014 accreditation

8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:
S No Level Discipline Program

1 Under Graduate Engineering &Technology B. Tech - Computer Science & Engg.
2 Under Graduate Engineering &Technology B. Tech - Electronics & Communication Engg.
9. Total number of employees in the institution:
A. Regular Employees (Faculty and Staff):

2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Items
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M 109 123 95 105 95 119
Faculty in Engineering
F 37 40 36 39 36 36
Faculty in Maths, Science & M 25 32 52 54 49 53
Humanities F 11 14 14 12 6 9
M 68 69 68 69 60 69
Non-teaching staff
F 28 27 28 27 23 27
Note: 75% should be Regular/Full Time faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual
Faculty/Adjunct Faculty/Resource Source from industry as per AICTE norms and
standards.
The contractual Faculty will be considered for assessment only if a faculty is drawing a
salary as prescribed by the concerned State Government for the contractual faculty in the
respective cadre and who have taught over consecutive 4 semesters..
B. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff) : (Not covered in Table A):
2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Items
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Faculty in Engineering F Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Faculty in Maths, Science & M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Humanities Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
F
M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Non-teaching staff
F Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
10. Total number of Engineering Students:

Engineering and Technology- UG  Shift1 Shift2
Engineering and Technology- PG  Shift1 Shift2
Engineering and Technology-
Shift1  Shift2
Polytechnic
MBA  Shift1 Shift2
MCA  Shift1 Shift2
Engineering and Technology- UG Shift -1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Total no. of boys 804 792 870
Total no. of girls 759 672 600
Total no. of students 1563 1464 1470
Engineering and Technology- PG Shift-1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Engineering and Technology- Polytechnic Shift-2
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Engineering and Technology- MBA Shift-1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Engineering and Technology- MCA Shift-1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

(Instruction: The data may be categorized in tabular form separately for under graduate,
postgraduate engineering, other program, if applicable)
Note: Incase the Institution is running AICTE approved additional courses such as MBA, MCA in
the first shift, engineering courses in the second shift, Polytechnic in Second shift etc.,
separate tables with the relevant heading shall be prepared.
11. Vision of the Institution:

"Striving for a symbiosis of Technological excellence and human values."
12. Mission of the Institution:

"To arm young brains with competitive technology and nurture holistic development of the
individuals for a better tomorrow"
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
i. Name : Dr. M Sasidhar
Designation : Principal
Mobile No : 9490797536
Email id : principalasist@gmail.com
ii. NBA coordinator, if designated:
Name : Dr. P Chiranjeevi

Designation : HOD CSE
Mobile No : 9490794017
Email id : acadirector.aj@gmail.com

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
PART B: Criteria Summary
Name of the program: Computer Science & Engineering
Criteria Mark/
Criteria Weightage
No.
Program Level Criteria
1. Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60
2. Program Curriculum and Teaching– Learning Processes 120
3. Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120
4. Students’ Performance 150
5. Faculty Information and Contributions 200
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80
7. Continuous Improvement 50
Institute Level Criteria
8. First Year Academics 50
9. Student Support Systems 50
10. Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources 120
Total 1000

CRITERION-1: Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives
1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60)
1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute (5)
Vision of the institute "Striving for a symbiosis of Technological excellence and human values."
"To arm young brains with competitive technology and nurture holistic
Mission of the institute
development of the individuals for a better tomorrow"
Nurturing globally competent computer science & engineering graduates
Vision of the Department
by inculcating values of leadership and research qualities.
 To impart high quality professional training with an emphasis on
basic principles of computer science and engineering
 To strengthen links with industry through partnerships and
collaborative development works.
 To attain self-sustainability and overall development through
research, consultancy and development activities
Mission of the
 To make the students as for as possible industry ready to enhance
Department
their employability in the industries
 To improve department industry collaboration through internship
program and interaction with professional society through
seminar/workshops.
 Imbibe social awareness and responsibility in students to serve the
society and protect environment
1.2. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5)

PEO1: Prepare graduates to have knowledge and competency for careers in and related to Computer
science
PEO2: Prepare graduates to become leader in fields related to Computer Science.
PEO3: Prepare graduates to pursue higher education in Engineering or other Professional fields
1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among
stakeholders (10)
 Institutes Website: www.amritasai.edu.in

 HOD Chambers
 Course files of each course
 Departmental Notice Board
 Laboratories

 Hostel notice board

 Lab Manuals
 College information Brochure (For this program)
 Posters
 TPO Office Notice board and information brochure
Apart from this, Vision and Mission is disseminated to all the stake holders of the programs through
faculty Meetings, student awareness workshops, student induction programs, and parent teacher
meetings etc.
List of stake holder

Internal:
1. Students
2. Faculty
3. Staff
4. Management
External:
1. Alumni
2. Parents
3. Industry/employer –Colors Software PVT LTD, Oreng Group, Fluidlogix.
4. Affiliating University
5. Commissioner of Technical Education, Govt. Of A.P.
6. AICTE/NBA
7. Academia
Apart from the published mission vision POs of institute/departmental recourses mentioned above
following activities are organized to ensure awareness and understanding: counseling sessions.
Orientations and course descriptions are shared with students.
1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the
program (25)
Vision and Mission of the Department is derived from the Vision and Mission of the Institute.
Vision and Mission of the Department and PEOs of the Programme is defined by performing analysis
of Strengths Weaknesses, Opportunities and threats faced in educational spheres by strengthening
feedback process of stakeholders and having discussions and interactions with students, faculty
members, administrators and alumni.

In establishing the Vision and Mission of the department, the following steps were followed:
Step1: Vision and Mission of the Institute are taken as basis.
Step2: Views are taken from stakeholders of the department such as industry, students, parents and
alumni.
Step3: The accepted views are analyzed and reviewed to check the consistency with the Vision and
Mission of the Institute.
Figure-1.4.1: Process of establishing Vision & Mission of Department
The Programme Educational Objectives are established through a consultation process involving the
core constituents such as Students, Alumni, Industry, Faculty and Parents with a procedure shown in
the following figure
Figure-1.4.2: Process of establishing PEOs of Department

The Programme Educational Objectives (PEO) is actually the broad statements of the objectives for
which the programme is run. In the first place, these objectives should help in fulfilling the mission of
the department. Secondly, the students graduating from the programme are expected to lead a fruitful
and meaningful life in the society by being useful in its progressive development. Thus it is necessary
that these objectives should be in consonance, to the extent possible, with the current research scenario
in the relevant field of engineering and with the needs of the relevant industry. The research scenario
is best judged by the faculty members through research publications. The industry needs are gauged
through the feedback, mostly verbal, received in the Training and Placement Office (TPO) when
companies come for campus placement. In addition, the industry scenario has a specific relationship
with research and hence faculty is fairly competent to assess the needs of industry. Moreover, the

alumni who have gone to industry or to institutes of high reputation are able to reflect whether the
objectives are adequate.
STEP 1: The needs of the Nation & society are identified through scientific publications, industry
interaction and media.
STEP 2: Taking the above into consideration, the PEOs are established by the Academic Advisory
Committee of the Department.
STEP 3: The PEOs are communicated to the alumni and their suggestions are obtained.
STEP 4: The PEOs are communicated to all the faculty members of the department and their feedback
is obtained.
STEP 5: The PEOs are then put to the final approval.
Figure-1.4.3: Process of finalizing PEOs of Department
List the Stakeholders of the Programme

Alumni – This group is interested as the rating of the department is affected by PEOs as these prepare
better graduates.
Students – The students are interested in whether the program adequately prepares them for future
employment.
Parents – They are interested to get their wards better education and employability.
Faculty – The faculty members are involved on regular basis in the assessment process

Employer (Government, Industry and Universities) – Employers satisfaction with our students’
education provides measure of the program success. Their satisfaction translates to employment
opportunities for our students
1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)

(Generate a “Mission of the Department–PEOs matrix” with justification and rationale of the
mapping)
M1: To impart high
M2:To
quality professional M3: To attain self-
strengthen links
training with an sustainability overall
with industry
PEO Statements emphasis on basic development through
through
principles of Computer research, consultancy and
partnerships and
Science and development activities
collaborative
Engineering
PEO1: Prepare
graduates to have
knowledge and
3 2 1
competency for careers
in and related to
Computer science.
PEO2: Prepare
graduates to become
1 3 2
leader in fields related
to Computer Science.
PEO3: Prepare
graduates to pursue
higher education in 1 2 3
Engineering or other
Professional fields.
Correlation levels 1,2 or 3 as defined :
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High).
1.5.1. Justify the academic factors involved in achievement of the PEOs

Listed below are the factors that are involved in the attainment of the PEOs.
 Curriculum and Syllabi
 Lesson Plan Course File Assessments
 Feedback
Curriculum and Syllabi:

The various courses for each program were selected in accordance with the PSOs of the program. The
courses both regular and elective were mapped along with the achievement of the PSO and
accordingly distributed among the various semesters of the program. The Syllabi for the courses are

designed in line with the principles of outcome based education and prime objective of attainment of
the PSOs.
Lesson Plan: A good curriculum and syllabi is effective only by a well-planned teaching Learning
Process. In order to aid this, all the faculty prepare a lesson plan well before the commencement of the
classes. This includes the theory and lab courses. It involves not only the contents of the syllabi but
focus is given to content beyond syllabus. This lesson plan is duly signed by the head of the
department, discussed in the first class committee meeting and then circulated amongst the concerned
students also.
Course File: It is a practice to maintain a course file for each theory course. This keeps track of all the
activities carried out in the class room during the course delivery. This includes the time table, lesson
plan, record of content delivery, assessment component details, and sample evaluated answer scripts,
marks of the continuous assessments tests and the performance analysis sheet and remedial action. The
performance analysis sheet and remedial actions taken sheet provides a way for the course teacher to
keep track of the students who have not performed well and also monitor their progress in the next
test. The course file also includes the internal assessment, end semester marks and statement of grades.
This course file is duly monitored by the Head of the Department and maintained in the Department
Library thus serving as a reference for the teachers who handle the courses.
Assessments: The students are evaluated on the basis their performance. This evaluation is done by
way of the continuous assessment tests and end semester examinations. For under graduate students
three continuous assessments and end semester examination is conducted for every course. The
assessment marks are displayed to the students after every test and also properly recorded. An entry of
the internal marks is made in the attendance log books of every course teacher.
Department Assessment Committee (DAC)

Department Assessment Committee for the Program consists of Program Coordinator, Module
Coordinator and faculty representatives. Chaired by Program Coordinator, the committee monitors the
attainment of PO and PEO’s. Evaluates program effectiveness and proposes necessary changes.
Prepares periodic reports, records on program activities, progress, status or other special reports for
management key stake holders. Motivates the faculty and students towards attending workshops,
developing projects, working models, paper publications and research. Interact with students, faculty,
Program Coordinators, Module Coordinator and outside/community agencies (through their
representation) in facilitating program educational objectives. DAC meets at least once in 6 months to
review the program and submits reports.

Department Assessment Committee
S.no Name Position held Responsibilities

Coordinating all faculty for smooth
1 Dr. P Chiranjeevi Program Coordinator
running
Distributing module to all faculty and
2 Sri. M Sivanjaneyulu Module Coordinator
monitoring
Course outcome, Program
Sri. M Vijay Kumar
3 Outcome, Program Specific Formulation of attainment
Sri. V Vinay Kumar
Outcome
4 Sri. Ch Srinivas Rao Continuous improvement Attainment of PO and PSO

CRITERION 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching– Learning Processes 120
2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING-LEARNINGPROCESSES (120)
2.1. Program Curriculum (20)

2.1.1.State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in
Annexure-I. Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any (10)
A. Process used to identify extent of compliance of the University Curriculum for attaining
the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes.
AMRITA SAI Institute of science of technology is affiliated under JNTUK Kakinada. So our
programme curriculum is as per the scheme and syllabus of affiliated university. Generally
Curriculum maintains the balance in the composition of basic science, humanities, professional
courses and their distribution in core and elective and breadth offerings. If some components, to
attain CO’s/ PO’s, are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university then the
Institution makes additional efforts to impart such knowledge by covering aspects through
“CONTENT BEYOND SYLLABUS”. We add content beyond syllabus by proper “GAP analysis”
process. The figure 2.1.1 gives the Curriculum Gap analysis and the figure 2.1.2 shows the process
of assessment of gap analysis.
Programme Outcomes (Pos)
PO Description
Engineering Knowledge: Apply knowledge of mathematics and science, with
PO1 fundamentals of Computer Science & Engineering to be able to solve complex
engineering problems related to CSE.
Problem Analysis: Identify, Formulate, review research literature and analyze
PO2 complex engineering problems related to CSE and reaching substantiated conclusions
using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences
Design/Development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering
problems related to CSE and design system components or processes that meet the
PO3
specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety and the
cultural societal and environmental considerations
Conduct Investigations of Complex problems: Use research–based knowledge and
PO4 research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data,
and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Modern Tool Usage: Create, Select and apply appropriate techniques, resources and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to computer
PO5
science related complex engineering activities with an understanding of the
limitations

The Engineer and Society: Apply Reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge
PO6 to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the CSE professional engineering practice
Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the CSE professional
PO7 engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development
Ethics: Apply Ethical Principles and commit to professional ethics and
PO8
responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice
Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual and as a member or
PO9
leader in diverse teams and in multidisciplinary Settings
Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large such as able to comprehend and
PO10
with write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations
and give and receive clear instructions.
Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
PO11 engineering management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member
and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multi-disciplinary environments
Life-Long Learning: Recognize the need for and have the preparation and ability to
PO12 engage in independent and life-long learning the broadest context of technological
change
List of PSO’s
PS01: Foundation of mathematical concepts: To use mathematical methodologies to crack problem
using suitable mathematical analysis, data structure and suitable algorithm.
PSO2: Foundation of Computer System: the ability to interpret the fundamental concepts and
methodology of computer systems. Students can understand the functionality of hardware and
software aspects of computer systems.
PSO3: Foundations of Software development: the ability to grasp the software development lifecycle
and methodologies of software systems. Possess competent skills and knowledge of software design
process. Familiarity and practical proficiency with a broad area of programming concepts and provide
new ideas and innovations towards research.

Figure-2.1.1: Processes used to identify the curricular gaps to the attainment of the
COs/POs Process for “Curriculum GAP ANALYSIS”
Gap Identification Process:
 DAC (Department Advisory Committee) had conducted number of meetings to align the
POs/PSOs with university curricula. Each faculty also developed the major elements of POs
and PSOs to determine the level their courses will be addressing. The department decided to
adopt Bloom’s level of Cognitive domain to decide the level of expected attainment. The
introductory level courses were termed as 1 covering level 1 & 2 of Bloom where students
were exposed to the a topic, 2 was given to courses that provided competence to the topic to the
students covering Blooms level 3& 4 and the courses where students gained mastery were
donated level 3 covering Bloom’s level 5 & 6 of cogitative domain.
 The table thus prepared was reviewed by faculty during departmental meetings to determine
which component of PO/PSOs were either not met or met to level 1 only. Discussions focused
on whether level 1 of introductory nature was adequate or does the department need to develop
more beyond syllabus topics, introduce additional electives, laboratory experiments etc. to
improve the level. For example it was found that PO on Management and Finance and
communication were not adequately addressed in the university syllabus, hence, additional
activities were planned.
 Meeting with Syllabus review committee, subject experts and HOD have been arranged to
review the syllabus provided by the university and to detect Gaps if any.
 Feedback From alumni and industry are analyzed.
 Analyzing the COs and POs mapping, weak areas are pointed out and gaps are identified.
 Corrective actions to be taken to bridge the gap are discussed and finalized the content beyond
syllabus to be taught.

Figure-2.1.2: Methodology of Gap analysis
B. List the curricular gaps for the attainment of defined POs and PSOs. Recommended subjects
to bridge academic and industry Gap Identification
1. As per the University Curriculum, basics of Object Oriented Programming are introduced in III
semester. The Course Object Oriented Programming with C++ does not introduce the real time
applications using C++. Therefore a course on Programming skills for real time applications using
C++ was identified and an adjunct faculty from industry was appointed.
2. As per the University curriculum, basics of Database Management System are introduced in V
semester. In today’s world, Big Data Analytics is considered very relevant.
3. And therefore a course on Big Data Analytics is identified for students of V th semester students
and an adjunct faculty to handle Big Data Analytics is applied.
4. As per the University Curriculum, Networks and Web Programming courses are introduced in 6th
Semester and 7th Semester. To bridge the gap between academics and Industry, a course on
Internet of Things (IoT) with awareness for hardware sensors is introduced with an adjunct faculty
from industry is appointed.
The other Topics added beyond the syllabus are:

 Programming skills for Real Time Applications using C++
 Neural Network
 Fuzzy logic
 Big Data Analytics
 IOT with awareness for hardware Sensors.

Implementation process:
Identified content beyond syllabus (Theory/Lab) is included in lesson plan and conducted in
classroom or laboratory by the subject teacher itself or internal/external subject experts.
Effectiveness:
Effectiveness of this process is analyzed through feedback from the students, through their
performance in examinations, from the Alumni, from Industries feedback etc. It is a continuous
improvement process which requires more and more fine tuning through regular feedbacks from
students and other stakeholders.
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs and
PSOs(10)
Delivery details of content beyond syllabus
 Library/internet assignments on contemporary issues.
 Additional laboratory experiments
 Pre-placement Training
 Training on Soft skills and value add programs
 Creative /Projects
 Guest lectures
 Workshops/conference
 Industrial Visits and internships
Events conducted to overcome Curriculum Gap identified in the academic year 2017-2018
Date- Relevance
S. Action Resource Person with % of
GAP Month- to PSs,
No Taken Designation students
Year PSOs
Sri K Gopala Reddy
Awareness Assoc Prof, CSE
Programme 30-11- Sri K Phani Srinivas PO 8,9,10
1 Seminar Head, R&D Cell, ASIST
100
on Computer 2017 PSO 1,3
Security Sri Ch Srinivasa Rao
Asst Prof, CSE
Prof. Sunder
Master
Vishwanathan,
Theorem in NPTEL 7-12- PO 8,9,10
2 Department of Computer 100
Divide & Video 2017 PSO 1,3
Science Engineering,
Conquer
IIT Bombay.
Prof.Kamala
NPTEL 12-12- Krithivasan,Department of PO 8,9,10
3 Grammars 90
Video 2017 Computer Science and PSO 1,3
Engineering,IIT Madras
Ethical 22-12- Dr. Sai Manoj Kudaravalli, PO 8,9,10
4 Hands on 92
Hacking 2017 ASIST PSO 1,3

Events conducted to overcome Curriculum Gap identified in the academic year 2016-2017
Date- Relevance
S. Action Resource Person with % of
GAP Month- to PSs,
No Taken Designation students
Year PSOs
Mr. P Raja Gopala Reddy,
29-07- PO 8,9,10
1 AJP Seminar Team Manager, Akur 90
2017 PSO 1,3
Informatics, Hyderabad
Prof. C.Pratap, University
NP hard MOOCs 03-01- of California Berkeley PO 8,9,10
2 90
Problems Program 2017 Extension Centre. PSO 1,3
Organized by JNTUK
MOOCs 04-01- TCS Consultants, PO 8,9,10
3 Ruby on Rails 90
Program 2017 Hyderabad PSO 1,3
Prof. D Janaki Ram,
MOOCs 02-02- PO 8,9,10
4 Normalization Professor, Department of 90
Program 2017 PSO 1,3
CSE, IITM, Madras
B Trees, B+ NPTEL 08-02- NPTEL videos provided PO 8,9,10
5 90
Trees Videos 2017 by the Institution PSO 1,3
Set theory in
Design and NPTEL 06-07- NPTEL videos provided PO 8,9,10
6 90
analysis of Videos 2017 by the Institution PSO 1,3
Algorithms
LALR Parser NPTEL 17-08- NPTEL videos provided PO 8,9,10
7 90
Techniques Videos 2017 by the Institution PSO 1,3
Events conducted to overcome Curriculum Gap Identified in the academic year 2015-2016
S.No Gap Action Date- Resource Person with % of Relevance to

Taken Month- Designation students POs, PSOs
Year
Mr. Md Ismail, Sr.
.Net Developer, Akur PO8,9,10
1 Seminar 27/08/2015 90
Technologies Technologies, PSO 1, 3
Hyderabad
Dr. E. SURESH BABU,
Network Professor, Acharya PO8,9,10
2 Workshop 9/01/2016 90
Simulator 2 Nagarjuna University, PSO 1, 3
Guntur
Cloud Dr Mohan, Professor in PO8,9,10
3 Seminar 16/02/2016 CSE, 90
computing PSO 1, 3
K L University,
Shivprakash B Chalgeri
Technical Vijayawada PO8,9,10
4 HACKING 18/03/2016 Software Developer, 90
Seminar PSO 1, 2
HP, Chennai

Mapping of content beyond Syllabus with the PO's & PSO's
PO’s
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Topics
Pre-placement
           
Training
Training on
           
Soft skills
Creative / Hobby
           
Projects
Guest lectures            
workshops            
Industrial Visits            
PSO’s
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Topics
Pre-placement Training   
Training on Soft skills   
Creative / Hobby Projects   
Guest lectures   
Workshops   
Industrial Visits   
2.2. Teaching -Learning Processes (100)

2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching &Learning (25)
Institutional calendar has been prepared and aligned with University academic calendar. In addition to
events proposed by the university in academic calendar, Institute has introduced many other events
which are useful in overall development of the students. For example training and placement skill
development program is a part of our academic calendar. During this event in addition to soft skill
development, emphasis also given on personality development of the students so that they become
employable. We are following the Institutional academic calendar in total. Our management and
higher officials are keen about follow up of the academic calendar.
Calendar of events – which include all other co-circular and extra-curricular activities
S.No Month Date Event
Subject Allotment for II/I & III/I
1. 05-06-2017 Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for II/I
& III/I
No v Staff meeting and submission of lesson plan by II/I & III/I to
2. 10-06-2017
department
Commencement of class work for II/I & III/I; Subject Allotment
3. 12-06-2016
for IV/I by HOD:CSE; Orientation program me for II/I & III/I

students; Instructions to preparation of lesson plan for IV/I faculty
4. 13-06-2017 Commencement of unit-1 instruction for II/I & III/I
Staff meeting and submission of lesson plan by IV/I to
5. 17-06-2017 department;
Checking compliance of lesson plan
Commencement of Class work for IV/I and Orientation program
6. 19-06-2017
for IV/I
Meeting with CRs of various classes in CSE
7. 20-06-2017
Commencement of unit-1 instruction for IV/I
8. 27-06-2017 Completion of unit-1 instruction for II/I & III/I
9. 28-06-2017 Commencement of unit-2 instruction for II/I & III/I
10. 01-07-2017 Checking compliance of lesson plan
Completion of unit-1 instruction for IV/I
11. 04-07-2017
12. 05-07-2017 Commencement of unit-2 instruction for IV/I; Staff meeting
14. 14-07-2017 Commencement of unit-2 instruction for IV/I
July
15. 18-07-2017 Meeting with CRs of various classes in CSE
16. 19-07-2017 Completion of unit-2 instruction for IV/I; Staff meeting
17. 21-07-2017 Commencement of unit-3 instruction for IV/I
19. 30-07-2017 Workshop for faculty members
20. 31-07-2017 Commencement of Revision Schedule for II/I & II/I
22. 02-08-2017 Staff Meeting
Completion of unit-3 instruction for IV/I
23. 05-08-2017
Completion of revision schedule for II/I & III/I
Commencement of Revision Schedule for II/I & II/I
24. 07-08-2017
Commencement of MID exams for II/I & III/I
25. 08-08-2017 Department Level NBA File verification
26. 12-08-2017 Completion of MID exams for II/I & III/I
Aug
27. 15-10-2017 Celebration of Independence Day
28. 16-08-2017 Commencement of unit-4 for II/I & III/I
29. 22-08-2017 Guest Lecture for III CSE
Commencement of unit-4 for IV/I
30. 23-08-2017
31. 29-08-2017 Department Level NBA File verification
34. 05-09-2017 Teachers day celebration by the department of CSE
35. 06-09-2017 Staff meeting
36. 07-09-2017 Completion of unit-4 for IV/I
37. 08-09-2017 Commencement of unit-5 for IV/I
38. 09-09-2017 Guest Lecture for II CSE
Sept
40. 13-09-2017 Completion of unit-5 for II/I & III/I
43. 20-09-2017 NSS Activity – Awareness on Anti ragging
44. 21-09-2017 Completion of unit-5 for IV/I
45. 22-09-2017 Commencement of unit-6 for IV/I
47. 27-09-2017 Completion of unit-6 for II/I & III/I
48. 28-09-2017 Commencement of Revision Schedule for II/I & III/I
Completion of Revision Schedule for II/I & III/I
49. 07-10-2017
Completion of unit-6 for IV/I
Commencement of II Mid examination for II/I & III/I
50. 09-10-2017
Commencement of Revision Schedule for IV/I
Completion of II Mid examination for II/I & III/I
51. 14-10-2017
Completion of Revision Schedule for IV/I
Oct
Commencement of II Mid examination for IV/I
52. 16-10-2017
Preparation and Practicals for II/I & III/I
53. 21-10-2017 Completion of II Mid examination for IV/I
Commencement of University examinations for II/I & III/I
54. 23-10-2017
Preparation and Practicals for IV/I
55. 30-10-2017 Commencement of University examinations for IV/I
56. 04-11-2017 Completion of University Examination to II/I & III/I
57. 11-112017 Completion of University Examination to IV/I
Subject Allotment for II/II & III/II by HOD:CSE
58. 06-11-2017 Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for
II/II & III/II
Subject Allotment for IV/II by HOD:CSE;
Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for
59. 11-11-2017
IV/II
Submission of lesson plans by II/II & III/II faculty
13-11-2017
Submission of lesson plans by IV/II faculty
60. to
Orientation programme for Staff on II semester subjects
18-11-2017
Subject Allotment for II/II & III/II by HOD:CSE
61. 06-11-2017 Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for
II/II & III/II
Nov Subject Allotment for IV/II by HOD:CSE;
Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for
62. 11-11-2017
IV/II
Submission of lesson plans by II/II & III/II faculty
13-11-2017
Submission of lesson plans by IV/II faculty
63. to
Orientation programme for Staff on II semester subjects
18-11-2017
64. 20-11-2017 Commencement of class work for II/II & III/II
65. 21-11-2017 Commencement of unit-1 instruction for II/II & III/II
Meeting with CRs of III/II; HODs meet with CEO, DOA, and
66. 24-11-2017
Principal
67. 25-11-2017 Meeting with CRs of II/II; Staff Meeting
68. 27-11-2017 Commencement of class work for IV/II
69. 28-11-2017 Commencement of unit-1 instruction for IV/II
70. 30-11-2017 Guest Lecture on “Computer Security” for II/II & III/II
Meeting with CRs of IV/II; HODs meet with CEO, DOA, and
71. 01-12-2017
Principal
DEC
73. 05-12-2017 Completion of Unit-I for II/II & III/II; Meeting with CRs of IV/II
74. DEC 1st Week Students Council By Principal For Ii,Iii & Iv Years
75. DEC 2nd Week Workshop For Ii Year

76. 15-12-2017 Display Of Attendance For Ii,Iii & Iv Years
78. JAN 1st week Workshop For Iv Year
15-01-2018 to I Mid Examinations For Ii & Iii Years
79.
20-01-2018
JAN 22-01-2018 to I Mid Examinations For Iv Year
81.
27-01-2018
82. 23-01-2018 Display Of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents For Ii & Iii Years
83. 30-01-2018 Display Of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents For Iv Year
85. 12-02-2018 Commencement Of Class Work For I M.Tech
87. FEB FEB 1st week Seminar On Embedded Systems For B.Tech/ M.Tech
88. FEB 2nd week Certification Program For Iii & Iv Years
05-03-2018 to Remedial Classes For Ii & Iii Years
90.
17-03-2018
91. 08-03-2018 Display Of Provisional Detention List For Ii & Iii Years
12-03-2018 to Remedial Classes For Iv Year
92.
24-03-2018
93. 15-03-2018 Display Of Provisional Detention List For Iv Year
MAR 19-03-2018 to Ii Mid Examinations For Ii & Iii Years
94.
24-03-2018
26-03-2018 to Ii Mid Examinations For Iv Year
95.
31-03-2018
26-03-2018 to Preparation & Practicals For Ii & Iii Years
96.
31-03-2018
97. 28-03-2018 Display Of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents For Ii & Iii Years
02-04-2018 to End Examinations For Ii & Iii Years
98.
14-04-2018
02-04-2018 to Preparation & Practicals For Iv Year
99.
APR 07-04-2018
100. 04-04-2018 Display Of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents Iv Year
09-04-2018 to End Examinations For Iv Year
101.
21-04-2018
A. Maintenance of Course files:

For each course, a course file is prepared by the concerned faculty. The course file consists of
following items:
There are many other items that we proposed to be included in the course file yesterday for
justifying the POs, COs and their attainment, including weak student support. Please mention them
as per the Index of contents in a course file.
Teaching plan:
Teaching plans for each and every course are prepared by the faculty. Whole syllabus is divided
into 6 units and 66 lectures as per the teaching scheme prescribed by the university. The course
objectives and course outcomes are defined for each course in line with the POs.
Lesson plan
Lesson plans are prepared for each lecture in the teaching plan by the faculty before the
commencement of the semester and it is duly approved after careful examination by the Head of
the Department and made available to the students. The lesson plan encompasses the learning
outcomes and the assessment of outcomes.
Question Bank:
Question banks are prepared for each topic in the course based on the course objectives and course
outcomes and considering the nature of the university question papers. The previous question
papers of University are also maintained in the course files. Assignment questions list and test
question papers along with key solutions are included in the course files.
B. Use of Various instructional methods and pedagogical initiatives:
Lecture method and Interactive learning:
The faculty use chalk and board and audio visual aids in teaching. Students are also encouraged to
actually interact during the lecture hour by getting the doubts clarified on the spot. faculty using
models , charts for interactive teaching
Project-based learning:
During the period of study in the 6th to 8th semester, many real time projects are given to the
students and they are guided by both faculty and Industry/Research personnel.
Computer-assisted learning:
The College has required number of computers, printers, LCD projectors, application software’s
and system software’s. These are effectively used for teaching. The students are also encouraged
to develop software’s for the solution of the assignments and tutorials. Many final year projects
are completed through the use of software.
SMART class Room
Faculty are using SMART class room to provide interactive session. Projector is used for
demonstration, video (NPTEL), audio of classes. Following are some additional pedagogical
initiatives taken by the department in addition to Chalk &Talk, Lectures, assignments, power
point presentation, tutorials;
 Role Play
 Working model/Visual charts/ videos
 Analogy with live examples from industries and surroundings
 Lecture interspersed with discussions among students
 E-tutorial
 Group assignments and projects

 Lab experiments beyond syllabus
 Quizzes(conventional/ Technical)
 Seminars/ presentations
 Group Discussions
 Designing and Problem solving through simulation, etc
Apart from the methods listed above, while developing and delivering the Course/Lectures Objectives,
the faculty considered cognitive aspects of Bloom’s Taxonomy i.e. the faculty listed what they wanted
the students to know- knowledge and development of intellectual skills.
C. Methodologies to support academically weak students and encourage bright students:
Guidelines to identify weak students

The Counsellors regularly conduct meetings regarding progress of their mentees and are
responsible to identify students who scored less than 50% marks in their internals. Under the HOD
direction, the students Counsellors evaluates the progress card of those students who score below
50% marks in three or more subject and below 75% attendance are considered as academically
weak students and same is also intimated to their parents.
Identification Criteria Actions taken
1. Based on the evaluation we were come to know that
students are weak in problem solving. Identified and
Students scoring less than 50% of
provided required inputs to uplift the students up to mark.
marks in Internal Assessment.
2. Intimating parents to counsel their wards.
3. Conduction of remedial classes
Diploma students-who joined

insufficient knowledge in Initiated and conducted Bridge course for identified students
mathematics
Students who fail in semester exams Conducted extra classes for failure students.
Weak student support strategy:

Mentors are appointed to enhance the performance of weak student as follows;
 Regular counseling and providing moral support to them.
 Encouraging them towards study through peer tutoring.
 Encouraging them for regular attendance.
 Proper guidance given to weak students through remedial support to clear their backlogs.
 Constant monitoring their performance in internal tests.
 Extra classes arranged for backlog subjects if needed.

Guidelines to identify Bright students
Identification Criteria Actions taken

Students awarded with First Class with Merit students are awarded with mementos
Distinction (FCD) in their Semester exams. along with cash prizes.
Top three students of each class. Awarded with mementos
Students securing ranks at University level. Distribution of Gold medals
Bright student support strategy: DAC (Department Advisory committee) has conducted a special
meeting to review on Bright students’ performance and provide a necessary inputs to improve their
skill set to meet the industry requirements and score more.
 Encouraging them to score good percentile in their final examination.
 Encouraging them to participate in seminars/conferences in different institutes.
Effectiveness: As per the Guide Lines from Alumni, Industry Experts, Feedback from students, we
took a necessary steps to improve the effectiveness in the curriculum etc.
D. Quality of classroom teaching:
The following innovative teaching methods are adopted by the faculty:
 Smart Board, LCDs etc. are used for teaching purposes.

E. Conduct of Experiments:
Institution is affiliated to JNTUK, Kakinada. We follow the syllabi prescribed by JNTUK along
with our Department DAC (Department Advisory Committee) has decided to teach Add on
experiments to meet the requirements of the industry.
F. Continuous Assessment in laboratory:
DAC (Department Advisory committee) has decided to evaluate the practical work on regular
basis both record work and experimental work.
G. Student feedback of teaching learning process and actions taken:
At the end of the semester, all the students are required to fill a feedback-form apprising the faculty
using a scale of 1 (high) through 10 (low). (Format available)
 Lecture classes are monitored by senior Professors and the HoD of the Department. They
give constructive comments to improve the quality of teaching and the teaching- learning
process.
 Counseling by the respective HoD for those faculty members who have secured less scores
and negative comments, if any, in the feedback. This motivates them to improve their skills
and abilities.

 If required training / orientation programmes are conducted by professional experts to

master the skills of the faculty members in the nuances of teaching, thus improving the
efficiency of teaching-learning process.
2.2.2. Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation (20)
A .Process for Internal Semester Question Paper setting and evaluation and effective process
implementation:
In a semester, there are three tests. Each of the tests consists of descriptive questions as well as
quizzes. The average of the best two tests is considered for final internal assessment.
 Defining Course Outcomes for every course
 Setting of questions of internal question papers based on reference to prescribed texts, model
question papers, Mapping of questions to PO’S, CO&, BT
 Defining of scheme of evaluation for the question paper
 Evaluation of answer sheets based on scheme
 Marks scored by the student in every test are sent to their parents Process from step 2 to step 5 is
repeated for the two tests.
 Best of two internal marks is calculated as final internal mark.
Blooms Taxonomy is followed while setting the internal exam question papers where the following
strategy is applied. The internal test consists of 15 Marks of subjective questions.
B. Process to ensure questions from outcomes/learning level perspectives
Each question is mapped with COs POs & Blooms taxonomy (BT) levels .Student who answered to
particular question is taken into consideration and average of all students’ marks is taken for CO-PO
attainment
C. Evidence of COs Coverage in class test/Mid-term test
Individual student’s blue book is evaluated and question answered by student is mapped with COs and
POs Sample is shown in annexure -1 CO-PO attainment
D. Quality of assignment and its relevance to COs
As part of continues improvement in terms of improving teaching performance and better out come
from students Assignment questions will be given to students, and evaluate the same and mapping
with CO’s.

Sample of Question Paper of Mid Semester Examination - I
Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, Kanchikacherla

Mid Sem -I Examination, August-2017
Course-B.Tech Branch-CSE, Sem-V Levels of
Subject: Operating Systems Bloom's CO
Duration: 1:30 Hrs Max Marks: 15 Min Passing Marks:08 taxonomy
Note: All Questions are compulsory. Question 1 through 3 carry 5
marks each.
Q.1 Classify different types of System Calls used in
(05) Understanding
Operating Systems?
CO1
Q.2 Define PCB? Draw and elaborate different types of Remembering,
(05)
process running status? Understanding
Q.3 Analyze Critical section problem? Given two solutions to
(05) Analyze CO2
execute two processes in critical sections?
Sample of Question Paper of Mid Semester Examination - II
Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, Kanchikacherla

Mid Sem -II Examination, October-2017
Course-B.Tech Branch-CSE, Sem-V Levels of
Subject: Operating Systems Bloom's CO
Duration: 1:30 Hrs Max Marks: 15 Min Passing Marks:08 taxonomy
Note: All Questions are compulsory. Question 1 through 3 carry 5 marks
each.
Q.1 Analyze reasons why paging was introduced? Explain
(05) Understanding CO3
paging technique with neat diagram?
Q.2 Analyze reasons why demand paging was introduced? Apply
FIFO, LRU and Optimal algorithms on the following (05) Apply CO4
reference string: 1,2,3,4,5,3,4,1,6,7,8,7,8,9,7,8,9,5,4,5,4,2
Q.3 Define deadlock? Explain necessary characteristics of a
deadlock? Construct resource allocation graph for the
following scenario:
Processes : P1, P2, P3
Resources : R1 has two instances, R2 has one
instance and R3 has two instances.
Rules:
1. R1 has 2 instances and one is allocated to P1 and (05) Applying CO5
another allocated to P2
2. R2 has one instance and which is allocated to P3
3. R3 has 2 instances and one is allocated to P3 and
another to P1
4. P2 is requesting for one instance of R3
5. P1 is requesting for one instance of R2
6. P3 is claiming for one instance of R1

Sample of Question Paper of Assignment
Assignment-5 (Sample):
Levels of
Q.
Note: Attempt all questions. Total marks: 5. Bloom's CO
No.
taxonomy
1. Identify which algorithm is suffering with Beladys anomaly
Analyzing
with an example?
2. Demonstrate Demand Paging in Virtual Memory of CO4
Analyzing
Operating Systems?
3. Distinguish between Paging and TLB paging? Analyzing
Mid Semester Examination – I
Course Outcome
Questions Aligned to Course Outcomes and
Attainment with target
Marks Obtained
in %
MID-I
Course Outcomes CO1 CO2 AV
S. CO1 CO2 G
Q.1 Q.2 Total Q.3 Total
No CO
Distribution of
5 5 10 5 5 80% 80% 80%
Marks-->
Roll No.
Set Target
80% 80%
Level---->
A Lakshmi
1 15AJ1A0501 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
Prasanna
2 15AJ1A0502 A Mahesh babu 4 5 9 4 4 1 1 2
A Puneeth
3 15AJ1A0503 3 4 7 4 4 0 1 1
Chowdary
4 15AJ1A0504 A Kavitha 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
5 15AJ1A0505 A Susmitha 3 4 7 4 4 0 1 2
6 15AJ1A0506 A Harika 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
7 15AJ1A0507 E N V Vpriya 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
8 15AJ1A0508 E Swapna 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
9 15AJ1A0509 E Siri Varshni 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
EM
10 15AJ1A0510 3 5 8 4 4 1 1 2
Chakravarthy
11 15AJ1A0511 E Nagadivya 3 5 8 4 4 1 1 2
12 15AJ1A0512 E Tejasri 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
Ch Venkateswara
13 15AJ1A0513 3 4 7 4 4 0 1 1
Rao
14 15AJ1A0514 Ch Geetha Vani 3 5 8 4 4 1 1 2
15 15AJ1A0515 Ch Ravi Kishore 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
16 15AJ1A0516 Ch Abhigna 3 5 8 3 3 1 0 1
17 15AJ1A0517 D S Sai 4 4 8 3 3 1 0 1
18 15AJ1A0518 K Anjitha 3 4 7 4 4 0 1 1

Mid Semester Examination – II
Course Outcome
Questions Aligned to Course Outcomes and Marks
Attainment with target
Obtained
in %
MID-I
Course Outcomes CO3 CO4 CO5
CO AVG
S. Q. Tota Tot CO3 CO5
Total Q.2 Q.3 4 CO
No 1 l al
Distribution of Marks-- 80
5 5 5 5 5 5 80% 80% 80%
> %
Roll No.
Set Target
80% 80%
Level---->
1 15AJ1A0501 A Lakshmi Prasanna 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
2 15AJ1A0502 A Mahesh Babu 4 4 4 4 3 3 1 1 0 2
3 15AJ1A0503 A Puneeth Chowdary 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
4 15AJ1A0504 A Kavitha 5 5 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
5 15AJ1A0505 A Susmitha 5 5 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
6 15AJ1A0506 A Harika 5 5 5 5 3 3 1 1 0 2
7 15AJ1A0507 E N V Vpriya 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
8 15AJ1A0508 E Swapna 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
9 15AJ1A0509 E Siri Varshni 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
10 15AJ1A0510 E M Chakravarthy 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
11 15AJ1A0511 E Nagadivya 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
12 15AJ1A0512 E Tejasri 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
13 15AJ1A0513 Ch Venkateswara Rao 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
14 15AJ1A0514 Ch Geetha Vani 4 4 4 4 3 3 1 1 0 2
15 15AJ1A0515 Ch Ravi Kishore 5 5 5 5 3 3 1 1 0 2
16 15AJ1A0516 Ch Abhigna 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
17 15AJ1A0517 D S Sai 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
18 15AJ1A0518 K Anjitha 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
Evaluation Process for Assignment

CO1 & CO2 CO3, CO4 & CO5 Course outcome
(Assignment-I) (Assignment-II) attainment with target in
%
Q. Q. Q.3 Tot Q. Q. Q. Tot CO1 CO3, AVG
1 2 al 1 2 3 al & CO4 & CO
CO2 CO5
Distribution of Marks 5 5 5 15 5 5 5 15 70% 70% 70%
Set Target Level 70% 70%
1 A Lakshmi Prasanna 4 3 4 11 3 4 3 10 1 0 1
2 A Mahesh Babu 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
3 A Puneeth Chowdary 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
4 A Kavitha 4 4 4 12 4 4 4 12 1 1 2
5 A Susmitha 4 4 3 11 4 3 4 11 1 1 2
6 A Harika 3 2 4 9 3 5 3 11 1 0 0
7 E N V Vpriya 3 4 4 11 4 4 3 11 1 1 2
8 E Swapna 3 3 4 10 3 4 3 10 0 0 0
9 E Siri Varshni 4 3 4 10 3 4 4 10 0 0 0
10 E M Chakravarthy 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
11 E Nagadivya 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
12 E Tejasri 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
13 Ch Venkateswara Rao 4 2 3 9 2 3 4 9 0 0 0
14 Ch Geetha Vani 4 2 3 9 2 3 4 9 0 0 0
15 Ch Ravi Kishore 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 9 0 0 0
16 Ch Abhigna 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
17 D S Sai 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
18 K Anjitha 4 3 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
2.2.3. Quality of student projects (25)

Initiatives:
 The student’s projects are selected in line with department Vision, Mission and Program
outcomes.
 Students are provided with brief idea of various fields for selecting the project ideas.
 The list of previous year projects is displayed at notice board which ensures no repetition of
project work and also encourages students to enhance the previous works.
 The faculties are encouraging the students to carry out in house projects. and support will be
provided with all necessary software and hardware.
 Encouraged students to participate in project exhibitions/Expo. conducted national level and
International Level. The project exhibition was aimed to provide common platform to
exhibit their innovations and their work towards excellence in latest technology.
Implementation:
A project coordinator is appointed by the Head of the department who is responsible for planning,
scheduling and execution of all the activities related to the student project work.
Impact Analysis:
 New innovative ideas are born for project work
 Skills or abilities of students improved.
 Knowledge on various aspects of project management were developed
 Confidence level of the students was boosted
 Improved team spirit
 Implementation and deployment of the project for social benefits.
 Document preparation and presentation.
Guidelines for evaluation of project work may include the following:
Nature of project
Quality of work report and final outcome
Presentation/ Viva-Voce
For each component/ element to be evaluated and weightages to be assigned to each component
are given in Table below for awarding sessional marks

Maximum
S.No. Items
Weightage
Nature of Project
Relevance (5%)
1. Novelty/ Originality (5%) 15%
Degree of Challenges Involved (5%)
Quality of work Report and Final Outcome
I. Quality of work (20%):
General appearance, binding and neatness; Utility/ feasibility for
practical applications; Organization and presentation of text; language
2. and style; quality of diagrams/ graphs etc,; accuracy in drawing 50%
conclusions; cross references; bibliography; suggestions for further
work.
II. Quality of Final Outcome (30%)
Aesthetics; functionality; user friendliness; cost effectiveness.
Presentation/ Viva-voce
Understanding Concepts, Principles, Practices, Design Considerations,
3. Results, Implementation, etc,. (15%) Communication Skills (10%) 35%
Viva Voce Skills (10%)
 Project presentation is taken thrice per semester in the presence of a project panel as
well as weekly/bi-weekly meetings and discussion with the concerned project
supervisor.
 Projects given to the students are related to state of art, industry relevant, hardware,
and latest software.
 Projects offered are with latest and new technological development in the area of power
system.
 Projects are based on mathematical modeling through simulation to analyze the
operation and performance under various operating condition.
 The hardware prototyping through various building blocks are carried out in the
respective laboratories for these projects.
MINOR PROJECT:
As per the university curriculum, the student has to complete minor project in seventh semester. The
project work is inside the campus. The project work is executed under the guidance of a faculty
member. Finally, the project work is assessed by external and internal examiners through
presentation and viva- voce.
CO1: Able to acquire system integration skills, documentation skills, project management skills and

problem solving skills.
CO2: Able to identify problems and solutions and also solve real-life problems.
CO3: Able to develop professionalism.
CO4: Able to develop oral as well as written presentation skills.
MAJOR PROJECT:
Every final year student undertakes project which is spread over a period of one semester. The student
selects a topic of his/her interest and then performs literature survey, formulates the problem formally
and then Implements it.
The project is carried-out under guidance of faculty member. The project work is assessed by external
and internal examiners through presentation and viva- voce. Our students have exhibited a high degree
of innovation, commitment and team work in executing the project work. Assessment of final year
students‟ projects must be done considering criteria such as – (i) Their quality, (ii) The state-of the-art
technology used in execution, (iii) Their relevance to industry and academics, (iv) The use and
development of theoretical and experimental methods, and (v) The coverage of boarder areas of the
program me. At the end of both semesters a report is submitted by the students. Progress is
continuously monitored by supervisor and an advisory committee. Midterm evaluation is done based
on presentation and midterm report submission. Final evolution is based on presentation, report
submitted, examination and demonstration. The ethical values are imbibed through proper referencing.
The project is evaluated by Project Coordination committee which consists of subject expert within the
department, supervisor and an expert from outside the college apart from B. E project coordinator. All
the POs are thus satisfied. A list of good and average projects is given below:
1. Projects are taken in groups of 4 students.
2. Students are guided by faculty members.
3. Projects are taken on a large variety of problems and many a times of a multidisciplinary
nature.
4. Projects are both theoretical and experimental.
CO1: Able to make comprehensive use of the technical knowledge gained from previous courses.
CO2: Able to understand technologies viz., platform, database, etc. concerned with the project.
CO3: Able to apply project management skills (scheduling work, procuring parts and documenting
expenditures and working within the confines of a deadline).
CO4: Able to analyze, develop and demonstrate Computer Science & Engineering and Information
Technology.
CO5: Able to communicate technical information by means of written and oral reports.

Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with POs for the year 2016-17.
Project Mapping with POs
Name of the Project Outcomes
S.No
Project Guide a b c d e f g h i j k L
Automatic test Dr. B
1 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
packet generation Veeramallu
Money transfer to M Vijay
2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3
anonymous Kumar
A System to filter
unwanted messages M
3 1 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
from OSN user Sivanjaneyulu
walls
Annotating search
Ch Srinivasa
4 results from web 1 3 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 2 2
Rao
databases
Student Performance
5 P Anil Kumar 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2
Management System
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
Summary Report of Average Projects Mapped with POs for the year 2016-17.
S.No
Best Keyword cover A Durga
1 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
search Bhavani
Crawling Hidden
M Vijay
2 Objects with KNN 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3
Kumar
Queries
Online consumer
V P S Vinay
3 behavior searching 1 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
Kumar
and buying products
A triggered approach
4 for generating an J Prabhudas 1 3 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 3 2 1
audit log
A hybrid cloud
approach for secure
5 K Archana 1 2 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 1
authorized
deduplication
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with PSOs for the year 2016-2017
Project Mapping with PSOs
PS Outcomes
S.No Name of the Project Project Guide
1 2 3
Automatic test packet Dr. B
1 2 2 2
generation Veeramallu
Money transfer to
2 M Vijay Kumar 2 2 2
anonymous
A System to filter
3 unwanted messages M Sivanjaneyulu 2 2 2
from OSN user walls

Annotating search
results from web Ch Srinivasa Rao 3 2 2
databases
Student Performance
P Anil Kumar 2 2 2
Management System
Summary Report of Average projects Mapped with PSOs for the year 2016-2017
PS Outcomes
1 2 3
Best Keyword cover
1 A Durga Bhavani 2 1 1
search
Crawling Hidden
2 Objects with KNN M Vijay Kumar 2 2 2
Queries
Online consumer
V P S Vinay
3 behavior searching and 1 1 1
Kumar
buying products
A triggered approach for
J Prabhudas 2 2 2
generating an audit log
A hybrid cloud
approach for secure K Archana 1 2 2
authorized deduplication
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with PEOs and PSOs for the year 2016-17.
Contributions/ Matching
Name of the Area of Project Achievements/ with
Project title
student(s) Specialization Guide Research Stated
Outputs PEOs
R V Gayatri
Automatic test
N Chaitanya Dr. B Award of B. P1, P2,
packet Networks
K Chandravathi Veeramallu Tech Degree P3, P4, P5
generation
P Mahesh
Ch Sowjanya
Money
P Sandhya M Vijay Award of B. P1, P2,
transfer to Networks
B J N Ramanjaneyulu Kumar Tech Degree P3, P4, P5
anonymous
V Satish
A System to
N Soundraya filter
Data M
G Hemamalini unwanted Award of B. P1, P2,
Warehousing Sivanjaney
V Sai Sowjanya messages from Tech Degree P3, P4, P5
and Mining ulu
M Padmavathi OSN user
walls
K Durga Bhavani Annotating
Data Ch
K Naga Mani search results Award of B. P1, P2,
Warehousing Srinivasa
V P N Lakshmi from web Tech Degree P3, P4, P5
and Mining Rao
N Gopi Krishna databases
D Ramya Krishna Student
Stand Alone P Anil Award of B. P1, P2,
P Navya Performance
Application Kumar Tech Degree P3, P4, P5
M Silpa Management
M Gopi Krishna System
Summary Report of Average Projects Mapped with PEOs for the year 2016-17
Contributions/ Matching
Area of
Name of the Project Achievements/ with
Project title Specializatio
student(s) Guide Research Stated
n
Outputs PEOs
N Nalini
Data A
B Mounika Best Keyword Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Warehousing Durga
P Sunanda cover search Tech Degree P4, P5
and Mining Bhavani
A Srikanth
M Jyothi
Crawling Hidden Data
N V Padmavathi M Vijay Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Objects with KNN Warehousing
G Sunitha Kumar Tech Degree P4, P5
Queries and Mining
B Sravani
R Tejasri Online consumer
Data VPS
K N S Manikanta behavior searching Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Warehousing Vinay
D Manasa and buying Tech Degree P4, P5
and Mining Kumar
V L R Tejaswini products
M Sindhura A triggered
Data J
B Sri Latha approach for Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Warehousing Prabhud
P L Manasa generating an audit Tech Degree P4, P5
and Mining as
A Navyasree log
SSNS Deeksha A hybrid cloud
Data
A Bramarambha approach for secure K Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Warehousing
Ch Anitha authorized Archana Tech Degree P4, P5
and Mining
Ch Venu Gopal deduplication
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with POs for the year 2015-2016.
S.No
Student Attendance P Ramesh
1 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
Management System Babu
Training and Dr. P
2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3
Placement Cell Chiranjeevi
Block Cipher CBC
3 mode of operation B Naga Raju 1 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
and 3-DES
Cam Cloud assisted
privacy preserving G Bharath
4 1 3 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 2 2
mobile health Kumar
monitoring
Online resume VPS Vinay
5 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2
builder Application Kumar

Summary Report of Average Projects Mapped with POs for the year 2016-17.
S.No
Dr. P
1 Student E Backtalk 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
Chiranjeevi
Online Loan
G Bharath
2 Application and 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 3
Kimar
verification process
Anatomy of
3 P Pavani 1 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3
intrusion
4 Result Analysis K Swami 1 3 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 3 2 1
Student elective
M Vijay
5 subject management 1 2 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 1
Kumar
software
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with PSOs for the year 2016-2017
PSO
1 2 3
Student Attendance
1 P Ramesh Babu 2 1 1
Management System
Training and Placement
2 Dr. P Chiranjeevi 2 2 2
Cell
Block Cipher CBC
3 mode of operation and B Naga Raju 1 1 1
3-DES
Cam Cloud assisted
privacy preserving G Bharath
2 2 2
mobile health Kumar
monitoring
Online resume builder VPS Vinay
1 2 2
Application Kumar
Summary Report of Average projects Mapped with PSOs for the year 2016-2017
PSO
1 2 3
1 Student E Backtalk Dr. P Chiranjeevi 2 2 2
Online Loan
2 Application and G Bharath Kimar 2 2 2
verification process
3 Anatomy of intrusion P Pavani 2 2 2
Result Analysis K Swami 3 2 2
Student elective subject
M Vijay Kumar 2 2 2
management software

Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with PEOs and PSOs for the year 2016-17.
Matchin
Contributions/A
Name of the Area of Project g with
Project title chievements/
student(s) Specialization Guide Stated
Research Outputs
PEOs
D Sindhura Student
P1, P2,
D Tulasi Sravya Attendance Stand Alone P Ramesh Award of B. Tech
P3, P4,
AD Navya Management Application Babu Degree
P5
A Haritha System
K Hyndhavi
Training and Dr. P P1, P2,
K Sailaja Stand Alone Award of B. Tech
Placement Chiranjee P3, P4,
K Srujana Application Degree
Cell vi P5
D L Manusha
K E Prasanth Kumar Block Cipher
P1, P2,
T Swarupa CBC mode of Network B Naga Award of B. Tech
P3, P4,
M P Sowmya operation and Security Raju Degree
P5
G Koteswara Rao 3-DES
Cam Cloud
K Sowjanya assisted
G P1, P2,
K Dharani privacy Cloud Award of B. Tech
Bharath P3, P4,
K S Giridhar preserving Computing Degree
Kumar P5
G Brahmaiah mobile health
monitoring
Y Ramya
Online resume VPS P1, P2,
N Mounika Stand Alone Award of B. Tech
builder Vinay P3, P4,
M Ranjit Application Degree
Application Kumar P5
Ch Mallikarjun
Contributions/
Area of Matching
Name of the Project Achievements/
Project title Specializatio with Stated
student(s) Guide Research
n PEOs
Outputs
T Kavitha Rani
Dr. P
P Kavya Sri Stand Alone Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Student E Backtalk Chiranje
P Naveena Application Tech Degree P4, P5
evi
P Anusha
I Lakshmi
Online Loan G
B Jyotshna Stand Alone Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Application and Bharath
G Sahithi Application Tech Degree P4, P5
verification process Kumar
Ch Sireesha
Ch Madhuri
G Naga Suneetha Anatomy of Network P Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Ch Ramya intrusion Security Pavani Tech Degree P4, P5
K Bhargavi
A R Rajeswari
Ch Sowmya Stand Alone K Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
Result Analysis
G Ravali Application Swami Tech Degree P4, P5
ANL Keerthana
K V S Saran Student elective Stand Alone M Vijay Award of B. P1, P2, P3,
M Chaitanya subject Application Kumar Tech Degree P4, P5

P S Ranga management
S Sai Pavan software
Best Projects of 2014-15

Matching
Name of Area of
Project Contributions/Achieveme with
the Project title Specializatio
Guide nts/ Research Outputs Stated
student(s) n
PEOs
Effective
Ms.P
Sri G Naga navigation Web P2,P3, P4,
Ramesh Award of B.Tech Degree
Sankar of query Application P5
Babu
results
Matching
Name of
Project Area of Project Contributions/Achievements/ with
the
title Specialization Guide Research Outputs Stated
student(s)
PEOs
Enhanced
Sri.M
B Lavanya Security Web P1, P3,
Rajesh Award of B.Tech Degree
for Online Application P4,p5
Reddy
Exams
Attainment of COs - PROJECTS (Sample Sheet for 2 groups only)

Project Rubric performance indicator aligned Course Outcome
Student Name to Course Outcomes and marks obtained Attainment with target Total
Group in %
S.
No. PI1 PI2 PI3 PI4 PI5 Total CO1 CO2 CO CO CO
Target Set3 to 80%
4 5
Distribution of
15 20 15 25 25 100 80% 80% 80%80%80%
marks
SRINIVAS 14 18 14 25 24 95 3 3 2 2 3 13
SANDHYA RANI 13 19 14 24 24 94 2 2 3 1 2 10
1
NAMITA 13 17 14 23 22 89 1 2 2 3 1 9
AIZAZ 12 18 13 24 23 90 1 0 1 1 1 4
M sowmya 14 19 13 24 23 93 2 2 3 3 1 12
Y murali Krishna 13 17 12 22 22 86 2 1 1 1 2 7
2
S ramya 13 18 13 23 22 89 1 1 2 3 2 9
N abhinay kumar 13 19 14 22 23 91 1 1 0 1 2 5
Average/Total 13.125 18.125 13.375 23.375 22.875 85 13 13 14 15 14
Avg % PI 83%
PI 1: Motivation and Reason of developing the project: Relate with Social, Environmental
and Ethical values
PI 2: In depth use of an extensive range of relevant literature
PI 3: Broad study of the advantages and Disadvantages of earlier existing projects related with
the same idea.
PI 4: Clearly demonstrated analysis of own research in relation to academic research and theory.
PI 5: Sound Analysis of Different strategies available with related project is done
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction (15)
o Industry trainings and visits
o Industry Expert lectures
o Membership to professional societies
o Industry projects
o Value added programs and seminars organized and participated by students
As evident from above both Traditional and Innovative Techniques are used to ensure course
objectives and delivered effectively such as Chalk and board, Laboratory /workshop practical,
tutorials, Seminars /guest lectures, Assignments, Surprise Tests and technical Quizzes, practical
training in industry/project work in industry, Industrial training and PPTs which are more traditional.
For innovative approaches for delivery following strategies are used:
o Innovative Approaches
o Learning through Problem solving
o Designing lab experiments
o E-tutorials
o NPTEL
o Cooperative learning
o Problem solving/ Brainstorming
o Active learning
o Self-learning through simulations/software
o An expert from Industry is considered to be a member of Department Assessment Committee
who takes active role in the design of curriculum gap.
o The institution has MOU‟s with various industries to strengthen the relationships with industry.
Effectiveness: Feedback from students about industrial visit and training is collected and impact of
such interventions is assessed. Based on which corrective actions are taken.
Corrective action points:
o Training report of the student is collected and analyzed for positive impact.
o Student feedback is utilized for exposure to better industries
o Students are exposed to real working environment in the industry.
o Students are required to deliver presentation about their industrial visit and training
o Feedback from industries where the internship is conducted is also obtained from students
as well as from the industry.
o Based on above feedback corrective action is taken to streamline the internship and training

for subsequent batches.
o Care is taken such that POs and PSOs are MET through these activities.
S. No of Students Date of PO's
Event Topic Resource Person
No. Participated Event met with
1 21st century Dr. P G Sastry 100 30-10- PO2
Workshop Engineering 2017
Education
2 Storage Area D.Veera prasad 106 12/9/2016 PO 2
Guest Lecture
Networks
Mr. Sk Khadar 8,9,10
Guest Lecture IOT 103 26/8/2017
Baba
3 Guest Lecture Cloud computing Dr MSR Prasad 118 16/7/2016 PO 4
4 Data Analytics Sri k Indrajith 102 4/02/2016
Guest Lecture
PO 1
5 Guest Lecture Data Mining Dr K S Rao 106 3/11/2015 PO 3
6 Guest Lecture Oracle SOA Dr chiranjeevi P 83 9/07/2015 PO 2
7 Web application Sri Suresh k 96 16/03/201 PO 2
Guest Lecture
Development 5
8 Computer Sri P Ramesh 109 07/01/201
Guest Lecture
Organization babu 5 PO 4
9 Data Mining Sri K Chandra 112 24/12/201 PO 2
Guest Lecture
Sekhar 4
10 Soft ware Dr M S R 117 3/08/2014 PO 3
Guest Lecture
Engineering Prasad
2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training (15)

INDUSTRIAL TRAINING:
The student has to execute a project work preferably at industry/R&D institution. The industrial
training is assessed by external and internal examiners through presentation and viva- voce.
Industry Internship 2016-2017
S.N Name Year Internship Company
O Hackers School ,
1 K. V Bhargava 2016-2017 Security Auditor Cartel Software Pvt. Ltd.
New Delhi
Geo Smser app Innogeecks Technologies,
2 Ch Gowtham Kumar 2016-2017
Development Vijayawada
3 Siva ram Prasad
4 Deepa
Innogeecks Technologies,
5 Sri lakshmi 2016-2017 .Net Technologies
Vijayawada
6 Jyostna
7 Srilatha

O
1 K Hyndavi 2015-2016 App Development Colors software solutions
2 D sindhu 2015-2016 Android Advantage One Group

O
1 Ch Sri Latha 2014-2015 Java ASM Technologies
2 L Rama Krishna 2014-2015 Android IonIdea, Banglore
3 L sindhu 2014-2015 .Net ASM Technologies
Industrial Visits: CAY (2016-17)
Name of Industry Duration Number of
S.No. With location Resource Person Month year- Month Students
Year
Infosys Spark Program Mr. P 17-03-2017 to 18-04-
1 Infosys campus, Ramalingam 2017 95
Bangalore

S.No. Name of Industry Resource Person Duration Number of
With location Month year- Month Year Students
1 Efftronics Pvt.ltd Mr. ch Ajay 13-07-2016 to 12-08-2016 112
2 Colors software solutions Mr Jaya krisha Reddy 07-04-2016 to 06-05-2016 102

S.No. Name of Industry Resource Person Duration Number of
With location Month year- Month Year Students
1 Wipro Technologies Rohith 04/05/2015 to 03-05-2015 99
2 Colors software solutions Abhishek 10/11/2014 to 30/11/2014 93
Implementation Details and Impact Analysis:

i. The College/placement cell will facilitate and monitor the student internship program.
ii. The College/Department/placement cell will strongly encourage students to undergo Internship
during vacation
iii. The internal guide has to visit the origination to know the performance of students during
internship period.
iv. The student shall make a midterm presentation of the activities undertaken during the
internship to a panel comprising Internship guide, a senior faculty from the department and
Head of the Department.
v. The student has to submit internship report to the Department.
vi. In case, if student makes any patents/copyrights, then royalty will be shared among all.
(industry side, college side).
Feedback and Impact Analysis: Effectiveness of this process is analyzed through feedback from the
students, through their performance in examinations/ Viva-voce, from the Alumni, from
Industries etc. Feedback from Industries is used for the improvement in training for further
batches.

CRITERION-3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120
3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAMOUTCOMES (120)
3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)(20)
(Program Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure I and Program Specific Outcomes as defined
by the Program)
PO1 Engineering Knowledge: Apply knowledge of mathematics and science, with
fundamentals of Computer Science & Engineering to be able to solve complex
engineering problems related to CSE.
PO2 Problem Analysis: Identify, Formulate, review research literature and analyze complex
engineering problems related to CSE and reaching substantiated conclusions using first
principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences.
PO3 Design/Development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems
related to CSE and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs
with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety and the cultural societal
and environmental considerations.
PO4 Conduct Investigations of Complex problems: Use research–based knowledge and
research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and
synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO5 Modern Tool Usage: Create, Select and apply appropriate techniques, resources and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to computer science
related complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO6 The Engineer and Society: Apply Reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the CSE professional Engineering practice.
PO7 Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the CSE professional
engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development
PO8 Ethics: Apply Ethical Principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.
PO9 Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual and as a member or
leader in diverse teams and in multidisciplinary Settings.
PO10 Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large such as able to comprehend and with write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations and give and receive

clear instructions.
PO11 Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and
leader in a team, to manage projects and in multi-disciplinary environments.
PO12 Life-Long Learning: Recognize the need for and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning the broadest context of technological
change.
List of PSO’s
PS01: Foundation of mathematical concepts: To use mathematical methodologies to crack
problem using suitable mathematical analysis, data structure and suitable algorithm.
PSO2: Foundation of Computer System: the ability to interpret the fundamental concepts and
methodology of computer systems. Students can understand the functionality of hardware and
software aspects of computer systems.
PSO3: Foundations of Software development: the ability to grasp the software development
lifecycle and methodologies of software systems. Possess competent skills and knowledge of
software design process. Familiarity and practical proficiency with a broad area of
programming concepts and provide new ideas and innovations towards research.
Correlation between POs PSO’s

PO’S PS01 PS02 PS03
PO1 3 2 2
PO2 2 1 2
PO3 2 3 3
PO4 2 2 1
PO5 2 2 2
PO6 3 2 2
PO7 1 3 2
PO8 2 2 3
PO9 2 2 3
PO10 1 2 2
PO11 2 2 3
PO12 3 3 3

3.1.1.Course Outcomes(COs)(SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each
semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence,
if asked)(05)
Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6.
Course Data Structures Course Year: 2016-2017

Items
Name: Description
Exposure to Algorithmic complexities, recursive algorithms, searching and sorting
C201.1
techniques
C201.2 Applying stack and queue techniques for logical operations
C201.3 Exposure to list representation models in various types of applications
C201.4 Implementation of tree implementation in various forms
C201.5 Advanced understanding of other variants trees and their operations
C201.6 Orientation on graphs, representation of graphs, graph traversals, spanning trees
Course Java Programming Course Year: 2016-2017

Items
Name: Description
C202.1 Gain the basic knowledge on Object Oriented concepts.
C202.2 Ability to develop applications using Object Oriented Programming Concepts.
C202.3 Ability to implement features of object oriented programming to solve real world
Students get good understanding in the fundamentals of object oriented programming
C202.4
which includes class scope, constructors , destructors and overloading concepts
Course Computer Organization Course Year: 2016-2017

Items
Name: Description
Ability to understand the organization of computer and machine instructions and
C202.1
programs
C202.2 Ability to understand Input / Output Organization
C202.3 Analyze the working of the memory system and basic processing unit.
C202.4 Ability to solve problems of multiprocessors and clusters.
Course Operating Systems Course Year: 2016-2017

Items
Name: Description
C301.1 To understand the role and responsibilities of system calls in OS
To analyses the process states and process scheduling in OS which deals with the
C301.2
processes for execution.

C301.3 To analyze process synchronization
To apply the knowledge about OS with memory management and secondary storage
C301.4
management.
CO 5: To analyze deadlocks in operating system when more than one processes is
C301.5
sharing different kinds of resources.
Course Database Management Systems Course Year: 2016-2017

Items
Name: Description
C301.1 Able to apply the concepts and design database for given information system.
C301.2 Develop database programming skills in SQL.
C301.3 Apply the concepts of Normalization and design database which possess no anomalies.
Able to write application programs considering the issues like concurrency control,
C301.4
recovery and security.
Course Cryptography and Network Security Course Year: 2016-2017

Items
Name: Description
Able to write application programs considering the issues like concurrency control,
C401.1
recovery and security.
C401.2 Identify the security issue in the network and resolve it
C401.3 Explain and analyze the basic Cryptographic algorithm for security
C401.4 Evaluate security mechanism using rigorous approaches
3.1.2.CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per
rd th
semester from 3 to 8 semester)(05)
1. Course name: Data Structures
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C201.1 2 2 3 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 3 1
C201.2 3 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 1
C201.3 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 2 3 2
C201.4 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 3
C201.5 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 2
C201.6 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 1
Average 2.33 2.33 2.17 2 1.83 1.67 1.67 2 2 2 2 1.67
2. Course name: Java Programming
C202.1 - - - 2 - - - - - - - -
C202.2 3 3 2 1 3 - - - - - - -
C202.3 3 3 3 - 3 2 2 - - - - -
C202.4 - - 2 3 3 2 2 - - 2 - 3
Average 3 3 2.33 2 3 2 2 - - 2 - 3

3. Course name: Computer Organization
C202.1 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 - 1 - 1
C202.2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 2
C202.3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 1 3 - 2
C202.4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2
Average 2.5 2.5 2 2 2 2.25 2.25 1.67 1.67 1.75 2 1.75
4. Course name: Operating Systems
C301.1 2 2 2 3 1 3 2 1 2 2 1 3
C301.2 3 3 1 1 3 1 2 2 - 3 2 1
C301.3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 - 3 2
C301.4 2 2 2 3 1 3 3 2 1 2 2 3
C301.5 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2
Average 2.4 2.2 1.8 2 1.8 2 2.4 2.2 1.75 2.25 1.8 2.2
5. Course name: Database Management Systems

C301.1 - - 2 - 2 - - - - 3 - -
C301.2 2 2 2 3 3 - 2 - 2 3 - 3
C301.3 - - 2 - - - 2 - - 3 - 2
C301.4 - - - 1 3 - - - 2 2 - 2
Average 2 2 2 2 2.67 - 2 - 2 2.75 - 2.33
6. Course name: Cryptography and Network Security

C401.1 3 3 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 2 3 2
C401.2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3
C401.3 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 1
C401.4 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 3
Average 2 2 2.25 1.5 1.75 2.25 2 2.5 2.5 2.25 2.5 2.25
Note:
Correlation levels 1,2 or3 as defined below:
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High) If there is no correlation, put “-”
2. CO- PSO Matrices of the selected courses

1. Course name: Data Structures
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C201.1 3 2 1
C201.2 3 2 -
C201.3 3 2 -
C201.4 3 2 -
C201.5 3 1 2
C201.6 - 1 2
Average 3 1.67 1.67

2. Course name: Java Programming
C202.1 3 1 3
C202.2 2 1 3
C202.3 2 2 3
C202.4 1 1 3
Average 2 1.25 3
3. Course name: Computer Organization

C301.1 3 2 1
C301.2 2 3 1
C301.3 2 3 2
C301.4 3 2 1
Average 2.5 2.5 1.25
4. Course name: Operating Systems
C301.1 3 2 1
C301.2 3 2 2
C301.3 3 2 1
C301.4 3 2 2
Average 3 2 1.5
5. Course name: Database Management Systems

C405.1 3 3 3
C405.2 1 2 3
C405.3 2 3 2
C405.4 1 1 3
Average 1.75 2.25 2.75
6. Course name: Cryptography and Network Security

C401.1 1 3 1
C401.2 3 3 2
C401.3 2 2 3
C401.4 1 1 3
Average 1.75 2.25 2.25
3.1.3. Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)
Course PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO1 PO1 PO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 12
Semester-I
English – I 3 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2
Mathematics -
3 2 3 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 2
I
Engineering
3 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 1
Chemistry
Engineering 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1
Mechanics
Computer
3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 2 2 0
Programming
Environmental
2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Studies
Semester-II
English – II 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mathematics –
3 3 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1
II
Mathematics –
3 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1
III
Engineering
3 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1
Physics
Professional
Ethics and 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0
Human Values
Engineering
3 3 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 0
Drawing
Semester-III
Managerial
Economics and
3 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 2
Financial
Analysis
Object
Oriented
3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 3
Programming
through C++
Mathematical
Foundations of
3 3 3 3 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0
Computer
Science
Digital Logic
3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
Design
Data Structures 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 1
Semester-IV
Probability and
3 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 0 0
statistics
Java
2 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 3 2 1
Programming
Advanced Data
2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2
Structures
Computer
2 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Organization
Formal
Languages and
1 2 2 3 1 0 0 2 2 1 2 3
Automata
Theory
Semester-V
Compiler
2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 3
Design
Data 3 3 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0
Communicatio
n
Principles of
Programming 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2
Languages
Database
Management 1 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 1
Systems
Operating
3 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2
Systems
Semester-VI
Computer
3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 2 1
Networks
Data Ware
housing and 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Mining
Design and
Analysis of 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 3
Algorithms
Software
2 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 2 1
Engineering
Web
3 2 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 1
Technologies
Semester-VII
Cryptography
and Network 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
Security
UML &
Design 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Patterns
Mobile
2 2 3 3 0 3 0 2 1 2 2 2
Computing
Software
Testing 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 2
Methodologies
Hadoop and
2 2 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 3 1 1
Big Data
Semester-VIII
Human
Computer 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
Interaction
Cloud
2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 1
Computing
Distributed
2 2 3 3 0 2 0 3 2 0 2 1
Systems
Management
2 2 3 2 0 2 0 3 3 1 2 1
Science
B Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses
1. Correlation levels 1, 2 or3 as defined below:
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High) if there is no correlation, put “-”

It may be noted that contents of Table 3.1.2 must be consistent within formation available in Table
3.1.3 for all the courses.
2. Program Level CO-PSO matrices for all courses including first year courses.

English – I 3 2 1
Mathematics - I 3 3 1
Engineering Chemistry 0 2 3
Engineering Mechanics 2 2 3
Computer Programming 0 1 3
Environmental Studies 2 2 2
English – II 3 2 1
Mathematics – II 3 3 1
Mathematics – III 0 2 3
Engineering Physics 2 2 3
Professional Ethics and Human Values 0 1 3
Engineering Drawing 2 2 2
Managerial Economics and Financial
3 2 1
Analysis
Object Oriented Programming through
3 3 1
C++
Mathematical Foundations of Computer
0 2 3
Science
Digital Logic Design 2 2 3
Data Structures 0 1 3
Probability and statistics 2 2 2
Java Programming 3 2 1
Advanced Data Structures 3 3 1
Computer Organization 0 2 3
Formal Languages and Automata Theory 2 2 3
Compiler Design 0 1 3
Data Communication 2 2 2
Principles of Programming Languages 3 2 1
Database Management Systems 3 3 1
Operating Systems 0 2 3
Computer Networks 2 2 3
Data Ware housing and Mining 0 1 3
Design and Analysis of Algorithms 2 2 2
Software Engineering 3 2 1
Web Technologies 3 3 1
Cryptography and Network Security 0 2 3
UML & Design Patterns 2 2 3
Mobile Computing 0 1 3
Software Testing Methodologies 2 2 2
Hadoop and Big Data 3 2 1
Human Computer Interaction 3 3 1
Cloud Computing 0 2 3
Distributed Systems 2 2 3
Management Science 0 1 3

3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)
3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
Course Outcome is based (10)
(Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam/ tutorial
questions, assignments, laboratory tests, project evaluation, student portfolios(A portfolio is a
collection of art if acts that demonstrate skills, personal characteristics and accomplishment screated
by the student during study period), internally developed assessment exams, project presentations, oral
exams etc.)
The key aspects in Outcome-Based Education (OBE) are the assessment of course outcomes. At the
initial stage of OBE implementation, the Course Outcomes (CO’s) for each course are defined based
on the Programme Outcome (PO’s) and other requirements. At the end of each course, the COs needs
to be assessed and evaluated, to check whether it has been attained or not. Assessment is one or more
processes, carried out by the department, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the
achievement of programme educational objectives and programme Outcomes. Attainment is the action
or fact of achieving a standard result towards accomplishment of desired goals. Primarily attainment is
the standard of academic attainment as observed by test or examination result. Attainment of the COs
can be measured directly and indirectly. Direct attainment basically displays the student’s knowledge
and skills from their performance. It can be determined from the performance of the students in all the
relevant assessment instruments – like internal assessments, assignments, quiz and final university
examination. These methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide
strong evidence of student learning. Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews ask the
stakeholders to reflect on student’s learning. They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduate’s
knowledge or skills. Indirect measures can provide information about graduate’s perception of their
learning and how this learning is valued by different stakeholders.
(A) Internal Tests/Exams:

 The Internal Assessment marks in theory papers shall be based on two tests generally
conducted twice in each semester as per the academic calendar stipulated by the affiliated
university.
 There shall be a maximum of 30 Internal Assessment Marks in each theory subjects.
 Question papers for the corresponding course will be prepared by the respective course faculty
and will be submitted to the Internal Test Coordinator well in advance.
 The Test Coordination team consists of following faculties:

Faculty Name Designation

Sri. V P S Vinay Kumar Assistant Professor
Ms. K Archana Assistant Professor
 Students’ performance in the IA test is evaluated as per the scheme and solution prepared by
the corresponding course faculty.
(B) Laboratory Exam Evaluation:

 The Internal Assessment marks shall be based on the laboratory reports and practical test.
 The laboratory in-charge will conduct the practical test.
 There shall be a maximum of 25 Internal Assessment Marks in each practical paper
 The evaluation procedure for laboratory courses are done by the laboratory In-Charge(s) based
on the following parameters: Divided into three components: Continuous Assessment: 10
marks, Record: 5 marks and Internal Test: 10 marks
(C) Seminar Work Evaluation:

 One seminar will be conducted per student in the final year 8th semester by a committee
consisting of the Head of the Department and three senior faculty members of the department
whom shall be the Seminar Coordinator(s).
 The Committee members are:
Dr. P Chiranjeevi Director of Academics
Sri. M. Vijay Kumar Associate Professor
Sri. P Ramesh Babu Associate Professor
 Seminar topic shall be selected from the emerging technical areas.
 The Internal Assessment marks are given based on the evaluation done by the committee
members (Head of the Department and Seminar Coordinator(s)) along with the guide and
reviewer following the rubrics set by the department as follows:
Component Marks Criteria

10 Clarity in presentation
10 Understanding concepts
Presentation
15 Answering queries
5 Organizing the presentation
Technical Seminar Report 10 Completeness of the report

(D) Project Work Evaluation:
 Project work at 8th semester shall be completed batch wise, each batch consisting of a
maximum of four candidates.
 The Project Coordinator(s) gives the instructions to the students by the end of 7th semester and
project batches are formed among the student.
 The Project Coordination team consists of the following faculty members:
Sri. P Ramesh Babu Associate Professor
Sri. M Sivanjayenulu Associate Professor
Sri. Sd Yasin Associate Professor
 Students will submit the synopsis of their project to the project coordinator(s) for scrutinizing.
 By the end of 7th semester zeroth review will be conducted to the students in order to approve
and finalize the selected topic.
 Based on the area of specialization and competency skills of the faculties, project
coordinator(s) will allocate the batches to the internal guides.
 The internal guide will continuously guide and monitor the students on weekly basis and get
the updates of the works done by their corresponding batch of students.
 Three project reviews will be conducted by the corresponding internal guide along with project
coordinator(s) based on a schedule.
S.No Review Scheduled Dates

1 1st Review January 27th – 31st, 2017
2 2nd Review February 21st – 25th, 2017
3 Final Review March 7th – 12th, 2017
 The Internal Assessment marks in case of project shall be based on the evaluation at the end of
8th semester by the committee consisting of Head of the Department, Project Coordinator(s)
and faculty members of the department whom shall be the project guide.
 The Internal Assessment marks will be submitted to the department once the evaluation is
done.
 Viva-voce examination in project work shall be conducted batch-wise by the panel of members
assigned by the university. Based on the performance of the students, the external viva voce
marks are awarded and the same is submitted to the university.
 The department encourages the students to showcase their skills by publishing papers in
conferences/journals forum and participating in technical paper presentations.

3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment
levels (40)
Practical aligned to course outcomes and marks obtained
P1,P2 P3,P4 P5,P6 P7,P8 P9,P10
Exp Exp Exp Exp Exp
Lab Lab Lab Lab Lab
r. Vi Tot r. Vi Tot r. Vi Tot r. Vi Tot r. Vi Tot
SN reco reco reco reco reco
o Roll No Name res va al res va al res va al res va al res va al
rd rd rd rd rd
ult ult ult ult ult
1
1 3 5 9 2 2 6 2 2 5 9 2 2 5 9 2 2 5 9
0
A Lakshmi
1 15AJ1A0501 1 3 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
Prasanna
A Mahes
2 15AJ1A0502 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Hbabu
A Puneeth
3 15AJ1A0503 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
Chowdary
4 15AJ1A0504 A Kavitha 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
A
5 15AJ1A0505 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Susmitha
6 15AJ1A0506 A Harika 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
ENV
7 15AJ1A0507 1 3 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Vpriya
8 15AJ1A0508 E Swapna 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
E Siri
9 15AJ1A0509 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Varshni
EM
10 15AJ1A0510 Chakravart 1 3 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
hy
E
11 15AJ1A0511 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Nagadivya
12 15AJ1A0512 E Tejasri 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Ch
13 15AJ1A0513 Venkatesw 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
ara Rao
Ch Geetha
14 15AJ1A0514 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Vani
Ch Ravi
15 15AJ1A0515 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
Kishore
Ch
16 15AJ1A0516 1 3 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
Abhigna
17 15AJ1A0517 D S Sai 1 3 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
18 15AJ1A0518 K Anjitha 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8

Attainment of course outcome for quiz:
Practical aligned to course out comes and marks obtained

CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5
S Name of the
Roll No T T T C C C C C
no Student Q TO Q Q Q Q TO Avg.
O O O O O O O O
1 T 1 1 1 1 T CO
T T T 1 2 3 4 5
7 7 7 7 7
Distribution of Marks 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 70%
% % % % %
Set Target Level 70% 70% 70% 70% 70%
A Lakshmi
1 15AJ1A0501 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 3
Prasanna
2 15AJ1A0502 A Mahes Hbabu 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 8
A Puneeth
3 15AJ1A0503 1 1 5 5 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 3
Chowdary
4 15AJ1A0504 A Kavitha 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
5 15AJ1A0505 A Susmitha 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 8
6 15AJ1A0506 A Harika 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 8
7 15AJ1A0507 E N V Vpriya 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 0 0 3
8 15AJ1A0508 E Swapna 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 3
9 15AJ1A0509 E Siri Varshni 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 0 0 3
10 15AJ1A0510 E M Chakravarthy 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 8
11 15AJ1A0511 E Nagadivya 4 4 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
12 15AJ1A0512 E Tejasri 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 3
Ch Venkateswara
13 15AJ1A0513 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 0 0 3
Rao
14 15AJ1A0514 Ch Geetha Vani 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
15 15AJ1A0515 Ch Ravi Kishore 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 3
Attainment of CO (MET/ NOT MET ) in University examination.

Questions aligned CO Met= 1
SNo Roll No to course out
comes and marks Attainment Met or Not met=
obtained Not 0
Maximum Marks 75.00 35.00
Set Target Level 45.00
1 15AJ1A0501 A Lakshmi prasanna 36 2 Met 1
2 15AJ1A0502 A Mahesh babu 38 3 Met 1
3 15AJ1A0503 A Puneeth 41 2 Met 1
Chowdary
4 15AJ1A0504 A Kavitha 43 3 Met 1
5 15AJ1A0505 A Susmitha 45 3 Met 1
6 15AJ1A0506 A Harika 35 2 Met 1
7 15AJ1A0507 E N V Vpriya 37 3 Met 1
8 15AJ1A0508 E Swapna 32 2 Met 1
9 15AJ1A0509 E Sirivarshni 35 3 Met 1
10 15AJ1A0510 E M Chakravarthy 33 3 Met 1
11 15AJ1A0511 E Nagadivya 32 2 Met 1
12 15aj1a0512 E Tejasri 31 2 Met 1

PO Attainment of individual courses
Semest PO PO PO
Course Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9
er 10 11 12
Data structures 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.9 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Managerial Economics and
2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
rd Financial Analysis
3 Object Oriented Programming
semest 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
through C++
er
Mathematical Foundations of
2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.7 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
Computer Science
Digital Logic Design 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Computer organization 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
th Probability and statistics 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.6
4 Java Programming 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
semest
Advanced Data Structures 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.6
er
Formal Languages and
2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.7 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Automata Theory
Operating systems 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.3
Compiler Design 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
th
5 Data Communication 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.8 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
semest Principles of Programming
2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
er Languages
Database Management
2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Systems
Design and analysis of
2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.6
algorithms
th
6 Computer Networks 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
semest Data Ware housing and
2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
er Mining
Software Engineering 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.5 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
Web Technologies 2.8 3.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.9 2.2 2.9
UML&DP 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Cryptography and Network
th 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
7 Security
semest Mobile Computing 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
er Software Testing
2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Methodologies
Hadoop and Big Data 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
th Distributed systems 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
8 Human Computer Interaction 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
semest Cloud Computing 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.6 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
er
Management Science 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.3
Action taken for all shortfall of target against each PO is reported in Criterion 7 in Item no. 7.1
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university
examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be
measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect to the Course
Outcomes of a course in addition to the performance in the University examination)

Measuring Course Outcomes attained through University Examinations
Target may be stated in terms of percentage of students getting more than the university
average marks or more as selected by the Program in the final examination. For cases where the
university does not provide useful indicators like average or median marks etc., the program
may choose an attainment level on its own with justification.
Example related to attainment levels Vs. targets:
(The examples indicated are for reference only. Program may appropriately define levels)
Attainment Level 1: 60% students scoring more than University average percentage marks or set
attainment level in the final examination.
 Attainment is measured in terms of actual percentage of students getting set percentage

of marks.
 If targets are achieved then all the course outcomes are attained for that year. Program is
expected to set higher targets for the following years as a part of continuous
improvement.
 If targets are not achieved the program should put in place an action plan to attain the
target in subsequent years.
Measuring CO attainment through Internal Assessments:

(The examples indicated are for reference only. Program may appropriately define levels) Target may
be stated in terms of percentage of students getting more than class average marks or set by the
program in each of the associated COs in the assessment instruments (midterm tests, assignments,
mini projects, reports and presentations etc. as mapped with the COs) Example Mid-term test 1
addresses C202.1 and C202.2. Out of the maximum 20 marks for this test 12 marks are associated with
C202.1 and 8 marks are associated with C202.2. Examples related to attainment levels Vs. targets:
Attainment Level 1: 60% students scoring more than 60% marks out of the relevant maximum marks.
13
 Attainment is measured in terms of actual percentage of students getting set percentage

of marks.
 If targets are achieved then the C202.1 and C202.2 are attained for that year. Program is
expected to set higher targets for the following years as a part of continuous
improvement.
 If targets are not achieved the program should put in place an action plan to attain the
target in subsequent years.

Similar targets and achievement are to be stated for the other midterm tests/internal assessment
instruments Course Outcome Attainment: For example: Attainment through University Examination:
Substantial i.e. 3 Attainment through Internal Assessment: Moderate i.e. 2 Assuming 80% weightage to
University examination and 20% weightage to Internal assessment, the attainment calculations will be
(80% of University level) + (20% of Internal level ) i.e. 80% of 3 + 20% of 2 = 2.4 + 0.4 = 2.8 Note:
Weightage of 80% to University exams is only an example. Programs may decide weightages
appropriately for University exams and internal assessment with due justification.
3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50)

3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the
Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10)
In Outcome based Education, assessment done through one or more than one processes, carried out by
the institution, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of program me
educational objectives, program outcomes and course objectives and outcomes.
PO Assessment Tools: Assessment tools are categorized into direct and indirect methods to assess the
program me educational objectives, program outcomes and course outcomes.
Direct methods display the students’ knowledge and skills from their performance in the continuous
assessment tests, end–semester examinations, presentations, and classroom assignments etc. these
methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of
student learning.
Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews ask the stakeholders to reflect on student’s learning.
They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduate’s knowledge or skills and their valued by
different stakeholders.
Direct Assessment methods are formative as well as summative.
For some of the POs that are abstract, rubrics has been designed using performance indicators and
shared with the students in advance. This helps students understand against which parameter their
work will be judged with the “scoring rules”. These rubrics can be used by students in, revising, and
judging their own work and progress.
Assignment / Quiz / Class Test
The assignment, Quiz and class test are a qualitative performance assessment tool designed to assess
students’ knowledge of engineering practices, framework, and problem solving. An analytic rubric
was developed to assess students’ knowledge with respect to the learning outcomes associated with the
scenario tool.
Group discussion/ Brainstorming
This is designed to assess student’s analytical capacity along with the capability to communicate with

others.
Midterm exams
End semester exam (theory + practical) Midterm and semester End examination are metric for
assessing whether all the POs are attained or not. Examination is more focused on attainment of course
outcomes and program outcomes.
Lab practical
This is mainly to assess student’s practical knowledge with their designing capabilities.
Course Evaluation
At the end of every semester, students give feedback for the course taught to them. In this feedback
survey students tell how effective course was in order to achieve POs.
Indirect Assessment methods
Programme outcomes / Assessment Report:
At the end of every academic year annual report is developed where the statistics of students who have
participated in professional bodies/ student chapters /workshops/seminars /conferences/paper
presentations / internships /industry visit etc,. is prepared. This statement is considered to indirectly
assess the PO's
Alumni Survey
Collect variety of information about program satisfaction, from Graduates end after every 2 years
Employer Survey
Provide information about our graduate's skills and capability. – After every 2 years
Student exit survey:
To evaluate the success of program me in providing students with opportunities to achieve the program
me outcomes- every year, Since an outcome can be achieved in more than one course, while assessing
a specific outcome, number of courses are assessed and both core and electives course are assessed.
Use of Rubrics for Evaluation and Assessment of POs
The Course/Programme outcomes are difficult to measure such as assessing critical thinking,
creativity, analytical skills, and problem solving etc. Hence the department has adopted Criterion
Referenced Rubrics to assess the POs and COs wherever appropriate. The Rubric criteria are either
developed by department faculty or sometimes even with consultation with students and distributed
before an assignment, project or test. Rubrics are used for both formative and summative assessment
of students. Same rubric is used for assessing an outcome so that the faculty is able to assess student
progress and maintain the record of the same for each student. The rubrics are shared with students
before being evaluated so that they are aware of the performance criteria and their weightage.
Program Outcome assessment process
For each outcome the Academic Cooperation Programme (ACP) along with program and course

coordinators define performance indicators (Assessment criteria) and their targets. Each performance
indicator is aligned to the courses and targets set for each performance indicator. The faculty members
then keep the POs in front of them develop COs (4-5 for each course) and then break each of their unit
outcome into elements of Blooms Taxonomy and define set of attributes for each outcome. These are
used for planning lectures, assignments, tests, projects etc. while developing their course files. Each
outcome is assessed in several courses to ensure that students acquire an appropriate level in terms of
knowledge/skills of an outcome. The course coordinators collect the qualitative and quantitative data
and use these for outcome assessment in a continual process. Each faculty pre-sets out targets for
assessment of course outcomes and prepares analysis of their course outcome based on student
performance, their own assessment and student feedback and present the same to the ACP along with
his/her suggestion for improvement. The course assessment is done at both formative and summative
levels.
The Program ACP studies the course analysis report of each faculty and decides course of assessed
and planned schedule for their assessment and submits the same to the Instructional Advisory
Committee on Computing (IACC) for initiating action of sending out survey instruments to relevant
alumni, employers and other external stakeholders.
The IACC initiates action of indirect assessment of POs based on the pre-defined and agreed schedule
with each ACP. The ACP analyzes the collected data. If the assessment meets the performance targets
the outcome is attained. Otherwise, corrective actions are initiated and results presented to the IACC
which then presents the same to Academic Advisory Board and seeks their suggestions and approval
for corrective action. The Department Advisory Board recommends content delivery methods/course
outcomes/ curriculum improvements as needed. Schedule of Assessment of POs: The department
plans to complete the exercise of assessing POs in a 6 year cycle given below
Data Collection Cycle for POs (2014-2018)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
PO Even odd Even odd Even odd Even odd Even odd
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the
knowledge of mathematics, science,
Computer Science engineering fundamentals, X X X
and an engineering specialization to the
solution of complex engineering problems
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate,
review research literature, and analyze
complex engineering problems reaching
substantiated conclusions using first X X X
principles of mathematics, natural sciences,
and Computer Science engineering sciences.

3. Design/development of solutions:
Design solutions for complex Computer
Science engineering problems and design
system components or processes that meet
X
the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and
safety, and the cultural, societal, and
environmental considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex
problems: Use research-based knowledge
and research methods including design of
experiments, analysis and interpretation of X X
data, and synthesis of the information to
provide valid conclusions in the field of
Computer Science engineering.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and
apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including
prediction and modeling to complex X X
Computer Science engineering activities
with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The Engineer and society Apply
reasoning informed by the contextual
knowledge to assess societal, health, safety,
X X X
legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional
Computer Science engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability:
Understand the impact of the Computer
Science engineering solutions in societal
X X
and environmental contexts, and
demonstrate the knowledge of and need for
sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit
to professional ethics and responsibilities X X
and norms of the engineering practice
9. Individual & Team Work: Function

effectively as an individual, and as a
member or leader in diverse teams, and in X X
multi-disciplinary settings.
10. Communication: Communicate

effectively on complex Computer Science
engineering activities with the engineering
community and with society at large, such
as, being able to comprehend and write X X X
effective reports and design documentation,
make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.

11. Project Management &Finance:

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding
of the Computer Science engineering and
management principles and apply these to X X X
one’s own work, as a member and leader in
a team, to manage projects and in
multidisciplinary environments.
12. Life Long Learning: Recognize the need

for, and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life- long X X
learning in the broadest context of
technological change.
Although the data will be collected every 3 years on select POs, as indicated above, there will be
activity taking place on each outcome every year
Activity for Each PO 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Review of performance indicators that define
x x
the outcome
Review educational strategies related to
x
performance indicators
Review mapping and identify where data will
x
be collected
Develop and/or review assessment methods to
x
be used to assess performance indicators
Collect Data x
Evaluate assessment data including processes x
Report findings x
Take action where necessary x
Assessment of POs and PSOs – Methodology

Assessment Assessment
Assessment Tool Reviewed by
Frequency Responsibility
End of the course survey Semester end Faculty Coordinator IQAC
Student performance in
Semester end Faculty Coordinator IQAC
university examinations
Rubrics (PO specific) As per need As Per Need IQAC
Faculty evaluation reports Semester end HOD IQAC
Department performance report Annually HOD IQAC
Exiting student survey Annually Faculty Coordinator IQAC
Alumni survey Annually Faculty Coordinator IQAC
Employer survey 1-2 year Faculty Coordinator IQAC
CO Assessment Methodology and Tools

Assessment Who will Review
Assessment tool Who will do it
frequency it.
End of course survey Semester End Faculty AC(P)
Student Feedback & Comments Semester End Exam Cell IQAC
Rubrics (PO Specific) As per need Faculty AC(P)

Faculty Evaluation reports Semester End Faculty AC(P) & PIAC
Internal assessment and Home
Every 2 months Faculty AC(P)
assignments
Semester end performance report End of semester Faculty AC(P)
Course Performance history plots As per need Faculty HOD
End of the semester Examinations End of semester Faculty AC(P)
Group Tasks As per need Faculty HOD
Projects As per need Faculty AC(P)
Assignments As per need Faculty HOD
Faculty assessment As per need HOD Director/HOD
AC(P) to present IACC/ Academic
Department performance report Annually
to IACC Advisory Board
3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (40)

Program shall set Program Outcome attainment levels for all POs& PSOs.
(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) and indirect (surveys) are to be presented
through Program level Course– PO& PSO matrix as indicated).
FACULTY : M VENKAT RAO
SUBJECT: DIGITAL LOGIC DESIGN Above average :3
SUBJECT CODE : Average :2
CO Attainment : Below Average:1
Direct Internal Assessment (20%) Direct External Assessment (80%)
Cos A B C2 D E=3 F= C+E
100% 60% OF 100% OF D
IA OF B EA
A
CO-1 1.0 0.61 1.22 0.35 1.03 2.25
CO-2 1.0 0.92 1.84 0.35 1.03 2.87
CO-3 1.0 0.94 1.88 0.35 1.03 2.91
CO-4 1.0 0.93 1.86 0.35 1.03 2.89
CO – PO MAPPING
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 P10 P11 P12
CO1 3 2 1 2 3 2 - - - - 2 -
CO2 3 2 1 2 1 - - - - - - 2
CO3 - - - 3 2 2 - - - 3 - 3
CO4 - 2 3 1 - - - - - 2 - 2
PO Attainment
Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
CO1 1.87 2.59 1.78 2.39 2.39 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 2.59
CO2 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 0 0 0 0 0 2.86
CO3 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.78 0 0 0 0 0 2.85
CO4 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.9 1.9 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 2.90

PO Attainment Level
CO
1.77 2.49 1.77 2.51 2.56 2.04 0 0 0 0 0 2.75
Attainment
Direct
1.82 2.46 1.82 2.50 2.50 2.04 0 0 0 0 0 2.80
Attainment
Indirect
1.59 2.59 1.56 2.56 2.8 2.04 0 0 0 0 0 2.56
Attainment
PSO Attainment
CO1 2.86 2.67 1.87
PSO Attainment Level
Direct Attainment 2.86 2.67 1.87
In Direct Attainment 2.89 2.67 1.67
CO Attainment 2.87 2.67 1.83

CRITERION 4 Students’ Performance 150
4. STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE (150)

Table 4.1
Item (Information to be provided
2017- 2016- 2015- 2014- 2013- 2012-
cumulatively for all the shifts with explicit
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
headings, wherever applicable)
Sanctioned intake of the program(N) 120 120 120 120 120 120
Total number of students admitted in first year
minus number of students migrated to other
118 112 119 104 80 77
programs/ institutions plus No. of students
migrated to this program (N1)
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in
0 0 0 2 0 4
the same batch via lateral entry (N2)
Separate division students, If applicable (N3) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total number of students admitted in the
118 112 119 106 80 81
programme(N1 + N2 + N3)
Table4.2
Number of students who have successfully
Total No of graduated without backlogs in any semester /
students admitted year of study (Without Backlog means no
Year of entry
in the program(N1 compartment or failures in any semester/year
+ N2 + N3) of study)
I year II year III year IV year
2017-2018 118 0 0 0 0
2016-2017 112 38 38 0 0
2015-2016 119 42 42 0 0
2014-2015(LYG) 106 49 28 26 0
2013-2014(LYGm1) 80 50 41 35 35
2012-2013 (LYGm2) 81 42 65 43 63
Table4.3
Total No of students Number of students who have successfully

admitted in the graduated
Year of entry
program(N1 + N2 +
N3) I year II year III year IV year
2016-2017 112 38 0 0 0
2015-2016 119 72 72 0 0
2014-2015 106 69 48 48 0
2013-2014(LYG) 80 60 55 46 52
2012-2013 (LYGm1) 81 72 73 53 72
2011-2012 (LYGm2) 109 91 70 74 96

4.1. Enrolment Ratio (20)

Enrolment Ratio=N1/N
Enrollment
N (FromTable4.1) N1 (FromTable4.1)
Ratio[(N1/N)*100]
2017-2018 120 118 98.33
2016-2017 120 112 93.33
2015-2016 120 119 99.17
Average [ (ER1 + ER2 + ER3) / 3 ] : 96.94% Assessment :20.00
4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40)
4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25)

SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/ (Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate
division, if applicable)
Average SI =Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × Average SI
Latest Year of
Latest Year of Latest Year of Latest Year of
Graduation
Graduation, Graduation, Graduation,
Item LYG LYG LYGm1
minus1,
LYGm2
(2016-2017) (2015-2016) (2014-2015)
(2013-2014)
X Number of students admitted in the

corresponding First year + admitted in 2nd 80.00 76.00 94.00 60.00
year via lateral entry and separated
division, if applicable
Y Number of students who have graduated 32.00 28.00 18.00 18.00
without backlogs in the stipulated period
Success Index [ SI = Y / X ] 0.4 0.37 0.19 0.30
Average SI [ (SI1 + SI2 + SI3) / 3 ] :0.32
Assessment [25 * Average SI] : 8.00
4.2.2.Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study (15)

SI=(Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course
duration)/(Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via
lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Average SI = mean of Success Index(SI) for past three batches
Success rate = 15 ×Average SI

Latest Year of Latest Year of Latest Year of Latest Year of

Graduation, Graduation, Graduation, Graduation
Item LYG LYG LYGm1 minus1, LYGm2
(2016-2017) (2015-2016) (2014-2015) (2013-2014)
X Number of students admitted in the

corresponding First year + admitted in 80.00 76.00 94.00 60.00
2nd year via lateral entry and
separated division, if applicable
Y Number of students who have 64.00 60.00 71.00 44.00

graduated in the stipulated period
Success Index [ SI = Y / X ] 0.80 0.79 0.75 0.73
Average SI[ ( SI1 + SI2 + SI3) / 3 ]: 0.78

Assessment [15 * Average SI] : 11.70
4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15)

Academic Performance =1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 3rdYear Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10))x(number of successful
students/ number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are
permitted to proceed to the final year.
Academic Performance 2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015
Mean of CGPA or mean percentage of all

6.90 7.10 7.17
successful students(X)
Total number of successful students(Y) 43.00 57.00 43.00
Total number of students appeared in the

102 76.00 79.00
examination(Z)
API = X * (Y/Z) 2.89 5.32 3.87
Average API [ (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 ] : 4.02

Assessment [1.5 * Average API] : 6.03
4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)

Academic Performance Level =1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API=((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10))x(number of
successful students /number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those
who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.

7.65 7.13 7.39
Total number of successful students (Y) 57.00 30.00 43.00
Total number of students appeared in the

116.00 106.00 77.00
examination (Z)
API [ X * (Y/Z) ] 3.74 1.99 4.06

Average API [(AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3]: 3.26
Assessment [1.5 * Average API]: 4.89
4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)

Assessment Points=40 × average placement
Item/Admitted year 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Total No of Final Year Students(N) 58.00 53.00 74.00
No of students placed in the companies or
43.00 45.00 55.00
government sector(X)
No of students admitted to higher studies with valid
qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or 4.00 3.00 13.00
National Level tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (Y)
No of students turned entrepreneur in
1.00 1.00 2.00
engineering/technology (Z)
x+y+z= 49 50.00 70.00
Placement Index [ (X+Y+Z)/N ] : 0.84 0.94 0.95
Average Placement [(P1 + P2 + P3)/3]: 0.91
Assessment [40 * Average Placement]:36.40
4.6. Professional Activities (20)

4.6.1. Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5)
No. of
S.No. Name of the Event Organized under Date(s)
Participants
1 Advanced java technologies IEI Student Chapter 06/08/2011 60
2 Microsoft programs IEI Student Chapter 20/06/2012 80
Software projects and career
3 IEI Student Chapter 20/07/2012 70
opportunities in industry
4 Computer networks IEI Student Chapter 04/08/2012 80
Guest Lecture on “Aptitude &
5 IEI Student Chapter 06/08/2013 60
Reasoning
6 Storage area networks IEI Student Chapter 21/12/2015 80

7 Guest Lecture on Network Simulator-2 IEI Student Chapter 03/09/2016 80

8 Guest lecture on Java technologies IEI Student Chapter 29/07/2017 80
9 Guest Lecture on Computer Virus IEI Student Chapter 30/11/2017 200
10 Guest Lecture on Ethical Hacking IEI Student Chapter 22/12/2017 180
4.6.2. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. (5)
(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors,
publishers, etc.)
Publication Month &

S. No Publication Coordinator Convener Publisher
Name Year
ASIST TECH HOD CSE Association of

1 News Letter K. SWAMI Jan- Mar 2015
TALK Dept CSE Dept.,

2 News Letter K. SWAMI Apr-Jun 2015

3 News Letter K. SWAMI Jul - Sep 2015

4 News Letter K. SWAMI Oct-Dec 2015


6 News Letter K. SWAMI Apr- Jun 2016

7 News Letter K. SWAMI Jul- Sep 2016

8 News Letter K. SWAMI Oct- Dec 2016


10 News Letter K. SWAMI Apr- Jun 2017

11 News Letter K. SWAMI Jul- Sep 2017

12 News Letter K. SWAMI Oct- Dec 2017

INSTITUTI
ON LEVEL INSTITUTIO
13 News Letter SRUJANA K. SWAMI Apr-Jun 2016
COMMITT N LEVEL
EE
INSTITUTI
ON LEVEL INSTITUTIO
14 News Letter SRUJANA K. SWAMI Jul - Sep 2016
COMMITT N LEVEL
EE
INSTITUTI
ON LEVEL INSTITUTIO
15 News Letter SRUJANA K. SWAMI Oct-Dec 2016
COMMITT N LEVEL
EE
INSTITUTI
ON LEVEL INSTITUTIO
16 News Letter SRUJANA K. SWAMI Jan-Mar 2017
COMMITT N LEVEL
EE
4.6.3. Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study(10)
(The Department shall provide at able indicating those publications, which received awards in the
events/ conferences organized by other institutes.)
S.No Name of the Event Name Organization Date of the Remarks
Student Event
Brain Lakshya – 2K17
1 N Dharani 15th Nov 2017 First Prize
Expeditions LBRCE
Dhanush 2K16, 27th,28th Jan Third
2 M Hemanth Sai Techno Trix
DIET 2017 Prize
Youth Fest Second
3 K V Bhargava Scintilla 17th Feb 2017
2K17, RVR&JC Prize
Project Sunrise 2K17, 18th, 19th Feb
4 K V Bhargava First Prize
Exhibition NRIIT 2017
Your Fest, 19th, 20th Feb
5 Ch. V Gopinath Solo dance First Prize
URCE 2016
Samyak-KLU- 25th, 26th Feb Second
6 Ch. V Gopinath Solo dance
2016 2016 Prize
Dhanush 2K16, 26th, 27th Feb Second
7 M Sai Kiran Techno Trix
DIET 2016 Prize
B. N V Vishnu Second
8 Project Expo APEX 2K16 15th Spet 2016
Priya Prize
Lakshya – 2K16
9 T Srikanth Nipuna 1st Oct, 2016 First Prize
LBRCE

CRITERION-5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200
5. FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS (200)
2015-2016
Academi
Distribution of
Qualification c
teaching load (%)
Research
All the Designations since joining the Institution

UG
Faculty receiving Ph.D during the assessment year
Sponsored Research (Funded Research)

Consultancy and Product Development
From this programme to other programme
Date of joining the Institution
From other programme to this programme

Name of the Faculty Member
Current Designation
Research Paper Publications

Serving 100% in programme
Degree (starting of from
Specialization
Year of Graduation
highest degree)
Ph.D Guidance
University
1st Year
PG
Ass 03/
M M.
JNT 201 oc Asst. 06/ 8 N 1
Vijay Tec 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 2 Prof Prof 201 0 o 5
Kumar h
. 3
Ass 10/
P M. Netw
AN 200 oc Asst. 06/ 10 N 1
Ramesh Tec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 orkin
U 8 Prof Prof 200 0 o 6
Babu h g
. 9
Ass 03/
Ch M.
JNT 201 oc Asst. 06/ 10 N 1
Srinivas Tec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 3 Prof Prof 201 0 o 4
a Rao h
. 3
Ass 01/
M M. Prog
JNT 200 oc 06/ 10 N
Sivanja Tec ram 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 No
UK 9 Prof 201 0 o
neyulu h mer
. 2
01/
K M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Mrudal Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
UK 2 Prof 201 0 o
a h Prof
2
01/
L M. Ass
200 Asst. 08/ 10 N
Srinivas Tec OU t. 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
8 Prof 201 0 o
a Rao h Prof
4
A M. JNT 201 Ass Asst. 02/ 10 N
0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
Satish Tec UH 1 t. Prof 06/ 0 o
h Prof 201
4
02/
VPS M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N 1
Vinay Tec oc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 2 Prof 201 0 o 5
Kumar h Prof
4
09/
M. Ass
K JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N 1
Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
Swami UH 2 Prof 201 0 o 4
h Prof
4
N 02/
M. Ass Prog
Venkat JNT 201 06/ 5 5 N
Tec t. ram 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 No
eswara UK 2 201 0 0 o
h Prof mer
Rao 4
C 01/
M. Ass
Chandr JNT 201 Asst. 08/ 10 N
Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
a UH 1 Prof 201 0 o
h Prof
Sekhar 4
01/
N M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 09/ 10 N
Srikant Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
UK 3 Prof 201 0 o
h h Prof
4
02/
Prof Netw
Dr. D Ph. AN 201 Prof 06/ 10 Y 1
esso 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 orkin
Haritha D U 3 essor 201 0 es 1
r g
4
P 02/
M. Ass
Narasi JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
mha UK 3 Prof 201 0 o
h Prof
Rao 4
02/
M. Ass
E JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Mahesh UK 3 Prof 201 0 o
h Prof
4
02/
M. Ass
P JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Pavani UK 4 Prof 201 0 o
h Prof
4
10/
Dr. Y Prof
Ph. 201 Prof 06/ 10 N 1
Vamsid AU esso 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
D. 3 essor 201 0 o 8
har r
5
10/
B M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Sudheer Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 201 0 o
Kumar h Prof
5
02/
B M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Mahes Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 3 Prof 201 0 o
wari h Prof
4
Sd M. JNT 201 Ass Asst. 02/ 10 N
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Saisen Tec UK 4 t. Prof 06/ 0 o
h Prof 201
4
24/
Dr. P Ass
Ph. CM 201 Asst. 06/ 10 Y 1 Clou
Chiranj oc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
D JU 4 Prof 200 0 es 2 d
eevi Prof
8
02/
Dr. K Prof Data
Ph. GIT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 Y 1
Nagesw esso 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mini
D AM 2 Prof 201 0 es 5
ara Rao r ng
4
Dr. J 02/
Prof Data
Chandr Ph. AN 201 Prof 06/ 10 Y 1
esso 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mini
a D U 1 essor 201 0 es 5
r ng
Sekhar 4
07/
G. M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Bharath Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 201 0 o
Kumar h Prof
4
K
02/
Chandr M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
a Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
UK 0 Prof 201 0 o
Bhusha h Prof
1
n
K.
02/
Subhas M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
h Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
UK 1 Prof 201 0 o
Chandr h Prof
4
a
10/
D Sunil M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Chakra Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 201 0 o
varthy h Prof
5
02/
M. Ass
Y JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Prasad UK 4 Prof 201 0 o
h Prof
4
02/
M M. Ass
JNT 201 Asst. 06/ 10 N
Rajesh Tec t. 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 No
UK 1 Prof 201 0 o
Reddy h Prof
1
B 15/
M. Ass Prog
Gangad JNT 201 06/ 10 N
Tec t. ram 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
hara UK 5 200 0 o
h Prof mer
Rao 9

2016-2017
Academi
Distribution of
Qualification c
teaching load (%)
Research

UG


Current Designation

Degree (starting of from
Specialization
Year of Graduation
highest degree)
Ph.D Guidance
University
1st Year
PG
Ass
M. 03/0
M Vijay JNT 201 oc Asst. 8 N 1
Te 6/20 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 No
Kumar UK 2 Prof Prof 0 o 5
ch 13
.
Ass
P M. 10/0 Netw
AN 200 oc Asst. 10 N 1
Ramesh Te 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 orkin
U 8 Prof Prof 0 o 6
Babu ch 09 g
.
Ass
Ch M. 03/0
JNT 201 oc Asst. 10 N 1
Srinivas Te 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 3 Prof Prof 0 o 4
a Rao ch 13
.
Ass
M M. Prog 01/0
JNT 200 oc 10 N
Sivanjan Te ram 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 No
UK 9 Prof 0 o
eyulu ch mer 12
.
A M. Ass 01/0
JNT 200 Asst. 10 N
Durgabh Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 No
UK 8 Prof 0 o
avani ch Prof 16
M. Ass 20/0
P Anil JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 No
Kumar UK 6 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
M. Ass 24/1
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Ch Mary Te t. 0/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UH 6 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
VPS M. Ass 02/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N 1
Vinay Te oc. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 2 Prof 0 o 5
Kumar ch Prof 14
K M. JNT 201 Ass Asst. 09/0 0 10 0 0 0 N 0 1 0 0 No

Swami Te UH 2 t. Prof 6/20 0 o 4
ch Prof 14
N
M. Ass Prog 02/0
Venkate JNT 201 5 5 N
Te t. ram 6/20 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 No
swara UK 2 0 0 o
ch Prof mer 14
Rao
C M. Ass 01/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Chandra Te t. 8/20 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
UH 1 Prof 0 o
Sekhar ch Prof 14
M. Ass 01/0
N JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 9/20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
Srikanth UK 3 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 14
M. Prof 24/1 Netw
K AN 201 Prof 10 Y
Te esso 0/20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 orkin
Archana U 3 essor 0 es
ch r 16 g
A
M. Ass Prog 04/0
Poornes JNT 201 10 N
Te t. ram 7/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
wara UK 6 0 o
ch Prof mer 10
Rao
VK M. Ass 03/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Chakrav Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
arthy ch Prof 16
Prof 10/0
Dr. K S Ph. SV 200 Prof 10 N 2
esso 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
N Prasad D. U 9 essor 0 o 2
r 16
B M. Ass 10/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Sudheer Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
Kumar ch Prof 15
B M. Ass 02/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Mahesw Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 3 Prof 0 o
ari ch Prof 14
M. Ass 02/0
Ch JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 No
Sreevani UK 2 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
Dr. P Ass 24/0
Ph. CM 201 Asst. 10 Y 1 Clou
Chiranje oc. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
D JU 4 Prof 0 es 2 d
evi Prof 08
Dr. K Prof 02/0 Data
Ph. GIT 201 Asst. 10 Y 1
Nagesw esso 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mini
D AM 2 Prof 0 es 5
ara Rao r 14 ng
Dr. K Ass 02/0
Sai oc. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Manoj Prof 16
K M. Ass 02/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Chandra Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
UK 0 Prof 0 o
Bhushan ch Prof 11
K. M. Ass 02/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Subhash Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 No
UK 1 Prof 0 o
Chandra ch Prof 14
D Sunil M. Ass 10/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Chakrav Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
arthy ch Prof 15
M M. Ass 02/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Rajesh Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 No
UK 1 Prof 0 o
Reddy ch Prof 11
B M. Ass Prog 15/0
JNT 201 10 N
Gangadh Te t. ram 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 5 0 o
ara Rao ch Prof mer 09
B M. Ass 25/0
JNT 201 Asst. 5 N
Dharma Te t. 6/20 0 50 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
Raju ch Prof 14
M. Ass Prog 30/0
JNT 201 10 N
Md. Rafi Te t. ram 1/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 6 0 o
ch Prof mer 10
2017-2018
Academi
Distribution of
Qualification c
teaching load (%)
Research

UG

Degree (starting of from highest degree)

Current Designation

Specialization
Year of Graduation
Ph.D Guidance
University
1st Year
PG
Ass
M. 03/0
M Vijay JNT 201 oc Asst. 8 N 1
Te 6/20 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 No
Kumar UK 2 Prof Prof 0 o 5
ch 13
.
Ass
M. 10/0 Netw
P Ramesh AN 200 oc Asst. 10 N 1
Te 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 orkin
Babu U 8 Prof Prof 0 o 6
ch 09 g
.
Ass
Ch M. 03/0
JNT 201 oc Asst. 10 N 1
Srinivasa Te 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 3 Prof Prof 0 o 4
Rao ch 13
.
M M. Ass Prog 01/0
JNT 200 10 N
Sivanjane Te oc ram 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 No
UK 9 0 o
yulu ch Prof mer 12
A M. JNT 200 Ass Asst. 01/0 10 N
0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 No
Durgabha Te UK 8 t. Prof 6/20 0 o

vani ch Prof 16
M. Ass 20/0
P Anil JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 No
Kumar UK 6 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
M. Ass 24/1
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Ch Mary Te t. 0/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UH 6 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
VPS M. Ass 02/0
Vinay Te oc. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 2 Prof 0 o 5
Kumar ch Prof 14
M. Ass 09/0
K Swami Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UH 2 Prof 0 o 4
ch Prof 14
N M. Ass Prog 02/0
JNT 201 5 5 N
Venkates Te t. ram 6/20 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 No
UK 2 0 0 o
wara Rao ch Prof mer 14
M. Prof 24/1 Netw
K AN 201 Prof 10 Y
Te esso 0/20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 orkin
Archana U 3 essor 0 es
ch r 16 g
A M. Ass Prog 04/0
JNT 201 10 N
Poornesw Te t. ram 7/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 6 0 o
VK M. Ass 03/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Chakrava Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
rthy ch Prof 16
B M. Ass 10/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Sudheer Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
Kumar ch Prof 15
M. Ass 02/0
Ch JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 No
Sreevani UK 2 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
Dr. P Ass 24/0
Chiranjee oc. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
vi Prof 08
Dr. K Prof 02/0 Data
Ph. GIT 201 Asst. 10 Y 1
Nageswar esso 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mini
D AM 2 Prof 0 es 5
a Rao r 14 ng
Ass 02/0
Dr. K Sai Ph. CM 201 Asst. 10 Y 0 Clou
oc. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Manoj D JU 4 Prof 0 es 8 d
Prof 16
B M. Ass Prog 15/0
JNT 201 10 N
Gangadh Te t. ram 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 5 0 o
M. Ass Asso 03/1
K Gopala JNT 201 10 N
Te oc. c. 1/20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
Reddy UK 6 0 o
ch Prof Prof 17
Sk.
M. Ass 27/1
Salma JNT 201 Asst. 5 N
Te t. 1/20 0 50 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Asiya UK 4 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 17
Begum
M. M. JNT 201 Ass Asst. 27/1 10 N
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Swojanya Te UK 7 t. Prof 1/20 0 o
ch Prof 17
Y. M. Ass 27/1
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Pradeep Te t. 1/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UK 6 Prof 0 o
Kumar ch Prof 17
Ch Rama M. Ass 09-
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Krishna Te t. 10- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No
UK 0 Prof 0 o
Reddy ch Prof 2017
M. Ass 27/1
P Jaya JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 1/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Krishna UK 5 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 17
M. Ass Asso 29/0
JNT 200 10 N
Sd. Yasin Te oc c 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
UH 8 0 o
ch Prof Prof 17
M. Ass 12/0
V JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 No
Madhavi UH 6 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 17
M. Ass 01/0
V JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 No
Srikanth UK 2 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 15
M. Ass 10/0
R JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 7/20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 No
Srinivas UK 2 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 17
P M. Ass 01/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Narasimh Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 No
UK 2 Prof 0 o
am ch Prof 15
PV M. Ass 01/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Sivarama Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 No
Krishna UK 4 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
M. Ass 01/0
JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
M Nikhita Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 No
UK 4 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 15
M. Ass 01/0
J Prabhu JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 6/20 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 No
Das UK 2 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 14
M. Ass 01/0
L Vijay JNT 201 Asst. 10 N
Te t. 8/20 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 No
Varma UK 2 Prof 0 o
ch Prof 16
5.1.Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR)(20)

S:F ratio = N/F; N = No. of students = 3*X where x is (approved intake + 20% lateral entry intake +
separate division, if any) F = No. of faculty = (a+b–c) for every assessment year
a: Total number of full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of the this program
b: Total number of full-time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) serving this
program from other Program(s)
c: Total number of fulltime equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load )of this program
serving other program(s) Regular Faculty means:

 Fulltime on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period of more than two
years AND drawing consolidated salary more than applicable gross salary shall only be counted as a
regular employee.
 Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the AICTE/ Central Government and
implementation as prescribed by the State Government. In case State Government prescribes lesser
consolidated salary for a particular cadre then same will be considered as reference while counting
faculty as a regular faculty.
Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR

between 15:1 and 20:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 20:1.
Year X N (3*X) F [(a+b-c)/100] SFR(N/F)

2017-2018 144.00 432.00 34.00 12.70
2016-2017 144.00 432.00 24.70 17.49
2015-2016 144.00 432.00 24.70 17.49

Average SFR for three assessment years: 16.17
Assessment SFR: 18.00
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25)
Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors
Year
Required F1 Available Required F2 Available Required F3 Available
2017-2018 3.20 3.00 6.40 8.00 19.20 23.00
2016-2017 3.20 5.00 6.40 5.00 19.20 19.00
2015-2016 3.20 5.00 6.40 5.00 19.20 22.00
Average
3.20 6.00 6.40 5.67 19.20 20.33
Numbers
If AF1 = AF2=0 then zero marks
Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25
Example: Student No. =180; Required number of Faculty: 12; RF1=1, RF2=2and RF3=9
Case1:AF1/RF1=1; AF2/RF2=1; AF3/RF3=1; Cadre proportion marks= (1+0.6+0.4) x12.5 = 25
Case 2: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 8/9; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x12.5
=limited to 5
Case3:AF1/RF1=0; AF2/RF2=1/2; AF3/RF3=11/9; Cadre proportion marks= (0+0.3+0.49) x12.5
=9.87

5.3.Faculty Qualification (25)
FQ=2.5x[(10X+4Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty
with M.Tech., F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:15 Faculty Student ratio (no. of
faculty and no. of students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
X Y F FQ = 2.5 x [(10X + 6Y) / F )]
2017-2018 3 31 26.40 20.45

2016-2017 4 25 26.40 18
2015-2016 4 24 26.40 17.42
5.4.Faculty Retention (25)

No. of regular faculty members in CAYm2= CAYm1= CAY=
Description 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
No of Faculty Retained 13 18 25
Total No Of Faculty 28 29 34
% of Faculty Retained 46.42 62.06 73.52
5.5.Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20)
Content Based Question Making Students are made to develop Questions Based on the topic and
then taught accordingly how to answer the questions
Video Based Student Enhancement Application videos of the topics are showed, based on which
students get a real life exposure of the scenario where the concepts they have learned is applied
Simulated Software Based Learning Topics are simulated using software tools by which the
students can directly relate to the topics being taught
e-based Link Exposure The links are provided for the students where they can do self study or go
for in depth knowledge of any topics
Animated Method of Learning Concepts hard to visualize are taught using Animations
Role Playing For easy understanding the students are made into various formations like block
diagrams or components etc
Brainstorming The students are made to discuss the topics before starting and the lectures are based
on the discussions made
Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following
description. Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of
student learning. These activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction
delivery, instructional methods, assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective,
efficient and engaging instruction. Any contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the
following criteria:
o The work must be made available on Institute website
o The work must be available for peer review and critique
o The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars
The department/institution may setup appropriate processes for making the contributions available to
the public, getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear
goals, adequate preparation, use of appropriate methods, and significance of results, effective
presentation and reflective critique
5.6.Faculty as participants in Faculty development/ training activities/STTPs (15)
A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program:3 Points
Max 5 per Faculty
Name of the Faculty
2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016
M Vijay Kumar 3.00 4.00 3.00
Ch Srinivasa Rao 3.00 3.00 3.00
P Ramesh Babu 3.00 4.00 3.00
K Swami 5.00 3.00 5.00
M Sivanjaneyulu 4.00 3.00 3.00
V P S Vinay Kumar 4.00 3.00 3.00
K Gopala Reddy 4.00 4.00 3.00
Dr. P Chiranjeevi 4.00 4.00 3.00
Dr. K Sai Manoj 4.00 4.00 4.00
M Rajesh Reddy 5.00 5.00 4.00
N Venkateswara Rao 4.00 4.00 3.00
B Dharma Raju 4.00 4.00 4.00
Ch Sree Vani 5.00 5.00 5.00
D Sunil Chakravarthy 5.00 5.00 5.00
Sum 57.00 55.00 51.00
RF = Number of Faculty required to comply
29.00 24.70 24.70
with 15:1 Student Faculty Ratio as per 5.1
Assessment [3*(Sum / 0.5RF)] 11.79 13.36 12.38
Average assessment over 3 years: 12.51
5.7. Research and Development (30)
5.7.1.Academic Research (10)

Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving Ph.D.
during the assessment period.
Number of quality publications in refereed/ SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc.(6)
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)
All relevant details shall be mentioned.
PUBLICATION TOTAL NO
IJIET 5
IJCMI 6
IJAASE 1
IJDCST 4
IJRCSC 1
IJASEM 8
IJER 2
IJCSM 2
Name of the journal

S.No Name of the faculty Paper title
Page number
Dr. Sai Manoj Kudaravalli, A Dynamic Framework of International Journal of Engineering
Dr. Chiranjeevi Paritala Advanced Mobile Video Research Online. Vol.5.,Issue.5,2017,
1
Streaming and Social video sept-oct, ISSN:23217758.With an Impact
sharing in clouds Factor 5.8701
2 Dr. Sai Manoj Kudaravalli, Faster content sharing over International Journal of Engineering
Dr. Chiranjeevi Paritala smart phone based Delay- Research- Online. Vol.5, Issue.4,
tolerant networks 2017,ISSN: 2321-7758. July-Aug
3 Dr. Sai Manoj Kudaravalli, An Efficient and Novel International journal of computer science
Dr. Chiranjeevi Paritala Approach Using T.H.E.S Mechatronics. SJIF-4.454|Vol.3.Issue
Methodology for CBIR .5.2017. ISSN: 2455-1910
4 Dr. Sai Manoj Kudaravalli, SOA Based CAM Cloud- International journal of computer science
Dr. Chiranjeevi Paritala Assisted Privacy Preserving Mechatronics. SJIF-4.454|Vol.3.Issue
Mobile Health Monitoring .6.2017. ISSN: 2455-1910
5 M. Vijay Kumar, An appraisal in Internet of International Journal of Computational
K. Gopala Reddy Things for Smart Cities And Mathematical Ideas [IJCMI] ISSN:
0974-8652 Volume-16 Issue: 1 sep: 2017,
54527- 54538
6 P Venkata Srinivasa Chari Control of Photo Sharing on International Journal of Computational
M.Sivanjaneyulu Online Social Networks Mathematical Ideas, ISSN:0974-8652
7 Deepthi Mallelli Audit-Free Cloud Storage via International Journal of Computational

Ch.Srinivasa rao Deniable Attribute-based Mathematical Ideas, ISSN:0974-8652
Encryption
8 Ramala venkata Prasad Continuous and Transparent International Journal of Computational
K.Swami User identity verification for Mathematical Ideas, ISSN:0974-8652
Secure internet services
9 Kedem Neelaveni Privacy Policy inference of user International Journal of Computational
A.Durga Bhavani Uploaded images on content Mathematical Ideas, ISSN:0974-8652
sharing sites
10 Machavarapu Vineela Privacy-Preserving and Truthful International Journal of Computational
Mallarapu Vijay Kumar Detection of packets Dropping Mathematical Ideas, ISSN:0974-8652
Attacks in wireless Ad Hoc
Networks

11 Rajesh Kumar CH A Framework for cloud service International Journal of Advances In Arts,
Soumen Kumar Roy Provider selection using MCDM Sciences and Engineering, Vol 4,Issue 9
P.Ramesh Babu Techniques
12 Aluri S N M Swetha Discovery of Ranking Fraud For IJDCST@DEC,-2016, ISSUE-V-4,I-
Dr. B.Veramallu Mobile Apps 8,SW-04, ISSN:2320-7884(ON)
ISSN:2321-0257(print)
13 Gurram Prameela Malware Propagation in Large- IJDCST@DEC,-2016, ISSUE-V-4,I-
P.Ramesh babu Scale Networks 8,SW-05, ISSN:2320-7884(ON)
14 Edukondalu Morla Secure Auditing and De IJDCST@DEC,-2016, ISSUE-V-4,I-
V.P.S.Vinay kumar duplicating Data in Cloud 8,SW-08, ISSN:2320-7884(ON)
15 Pulagam Sahithy Secure Distributed De IJDCST@DEC,-2016, ISSUE-V-4,I-
M.Nikitha duplication systems 8,SW-09, ISSN:2320-7884(ON)
16 M.Vijay kumar Public Auditing With Privacy National Conference on “Recent Trends
Ch.SrinivasaRao for Secure Public Cloud Storage In Advanced Computing”
NCRTIAC2K16, ISSN:2321-5585(ON)
17 K.Sushma A Distributed Three-hop International Journal of Applied Sciences,
Y.Vamsidhar Routing Protocol to increase the Engineering and Management
capacity of Hybrid wireless ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
networks
18 P.Ramesh Security Evaluation of Pattern International Journal of Applied Sciences,
M.Siva anjaneyulu Classifiers under Attack Engineering and Management
ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
19 Swami Konakanchi Parallel Mining of Frequent Item International Journal of Mechanical
V.P.S.Vinay kumar sets Based on Map Reduce Engineering and Computer Applications
Chanda.SrinivasaRao Approach ISSN:2320-6349
20 P.Ramya Latha Detecting Malicious Face book International Journal of Applied Sciences,
P.Ramesh babu Applications Engineering and Management
ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
21 Aswani Nalam Privacy using Adaptive Privacy International Journal of Applied Sciences,
P.Ramesh babu Policy Prediction(A3P)for user Engineering and Management
uploaded images on content ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
sharing sites
22 Kommineni Madhavi Cloud Armor : A Trusty International Journal of Applied Sciences,
M.Vijay kumar supporting reputation-based Engineering and Management
management for cloud services ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
23 M.Vijay kumar A Computational dynamic trust International Journal of Applied Sciences,
M.V.N.S.D Kiran model for user authorization Engineering and Management
ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 02
24 U Tejaswi Identity-based Encryption with International Journal of Applied Sciences,
V.P.S.Vinay kumar Outsourced Revocation in Cloud Engineering and Management
Computing ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
25 G.Sankar Towards Effective Bug Triage International Journal of Applied Sciences,
Ch.SrinivasaRao with software DAT reduction Engineering and Management
Techniques ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
26 Sivaji Yerraguntla CONTEXT-BASED International Journal of Applied Sciences,
Borugadda Nagaraju DIVERSIFICATION FOR Engineering and Management
KEYWORD QUERIES OVER ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
XML DATA
27 Pavani potunuri Vampire Attacks:Drainng life International Journal of Sciences,
Bhartha kumar Gowru from wireless Adhoc Sensor Engineering and Advanced Technology
Venkateswara Rao Nadakuditi Networks ISSN:2321-6905SEAT, VOL 3,ISSU 11
28 T.Latha Enabling fine-grained Multi- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
V.P.S.Vinay kumar keyword search supporting APPLED SCIENCS,ENGINEERING
classified sub-dictionaries over AND MANAGEMENT
encrypted cloud data ISSN:2320-3439, VOL 04,No. 03
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)
1. Dr. K Sai Manoj, CEO has received his Ph.D. during the academic year 2014-2015.
2. Dr. P Chiranjeevi, Associate Professor has received his Ph.D. during the academic year 2014-
2015.
5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)
Funded research:
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration) Funding amount
(Cumulative during three academic years):
Amount >20 Lacs – 5Marks
Amount >= 16 Lacs and<=20 lacs– 4 Marks
Amount >= 12 Lacs and< 16 lacs– 3 Marks
Amount >=8 Lacs and <12 lacs– 2 Marks Amount >=4 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 1 Mark Amount <4 Lacs–
0 Mark
The college has not derived any Sponsored Research projects from outside; however, The Management
has taken an initiative to provide seed funding for the students and post graduate researchers at
institutional levels of their own funds. The following are the details:
Seed funds allotted for the year 2017-2018
S. No Allotted seed fund
1 Rs. 250000

1 Rs. 250000

1 Rs. 200000

1 Rs. 150000
5.7.3.Development activities (10)
Research laboratories
S.No Licensed Software Description
1 Microsoft e- Licensed
2 Window Server
3 MS Office
4 SQL Server
5 Windows XP
6 Linux ,NS2
7 Ardino Board
8 Mat Lab

Instructional materials
S.No Details
1 Smart Class(Multimedia Projector)
2 Lab Manual
3 NPTEL videos
4 Assignments
5 PPT
Working models/ charts/ monogrammed.

S.No Details
1 Animations
2 Lab Description Charts
3 Lab Manuals
Provide details:
o Product Development
o Research laboratories
o Instructional materials
o Working models/charts/monograms etc.
5.7.4. Consultancy (from Industry)(5)
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding amount (Cumulative during three academic years): Amount >10 Lacs – 5Marks
Amount >=8 Lacs and <= 10 lacs– 4 Marks
Amount >=6 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 3 Marks
Amount >=4 Lacs and < 6 lacs – 2 Marks Amount >=2Lacsand < 4 lacs – 1 Mark
Amount <2 Lacs– 0 Mark
2017-2018
Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount
web site for Agri farms 6 months Dhanalakshmi Agri farms 50000.00
sixth wall 3 months Innogeecks Global services 10000.00
2016-2017
web site for agri farms 6 months Dhanalakshmi Agri farms 50000.00
sixth wall 3 months Innogeecks Global services 10000.00

2015-2016
website for payment 3 months NUKON blocks 25000.00
5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)
Faculty members of Higher Educational Institutions today have to perform a variety of tasks
pertaining to diverse roles. In addition to instruction, Faculty members need to innovate and conduct
research for their self-renewal, keep a breast with changes in technology, and develop expertise for
effective implementation of curricula. They are also expected to provide services to the industry and
community for understanding and contributing to the solution of real life problems in industry.
Another role relates to the shouldering of administrative responsibilities and co-operation with other
Faculty, Heads-of-Departments and the Head of Institute. An effective performance appraisal system
for Faculty is vital for optimizing the contribution of individual Faculty to institutional performance.
The assessment is based on:

 A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years (10)
 Its implementation and effectiveness (20)
A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years
(i) Faculty Self Assessment – A format is being provided which the faculty has to fill twice every
year
(ii) Departmental Assessment Committee – It assess results after every end semester exams
(iii) Feedbacks from Students – Discussion with student representatives and gets feedbacks
about every individual faculty monthly once
Its implementation and effectiveness
Faculty Self Assessment:-
Implementation: - The faculty fills a form by which he can know what all shortcomings he has done
in teaching a particular subject
Effectiveness: - The faculty hence becomes aware so as not to repeat the same thing again, as well
as it helps him to cover the subject effectively in the coming semesters
Departmental Assessment Committee
Implementation:-The End semester results are assessed using various criteria‟s as well as compared
with the internal exams conducted
Effectiveness:-This helps a faculty to motivate and help students to improve in the subject
Feedbacks from Students
Implementation:-Every month a meeting is held with the students committee
Effectiveness:-It helps the teacher to improve his teaching style
Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology
Approved by AICTE, New Delhi; Permanently Affiliated to JNTUK, Kakinada
ISO 9001:2015 Certified Institution, Accredited by NAAC with ‘A’ grade
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 521 180
www.amritasai.edu.in, 0866 2428399
Ref: ASIST/FAC/SA/16.
FACULTY SELF APPRAISAL FORM
1. Name :
2. Designation :
3. Department :
ACADEMIC WORKS
4. Progress Report for the Academic Year : Odd / Even Sem
Annual/Semester I Annual/Semester II
Particulars
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 1 Subject 2
Subject Title
% of Syllabus Covered
No. of Units Completed
No. of Periods Conducted
No of Students Registered
Percentage of Pass
Percentage of Fail
Highest Mark
Average Mark
No. of Students Securing > 60%
5. (a) Type & No. of Innovative methods (Class Room):
(b) Extra Coaching Arranged :
6. Laboratory :
No. of Session Conducted :
No. of Experiments prescribed in the syllabus:
No. of Experiments Completed :
7. List of Seminars / Workshops Attended During this Academic Year
8. List of Papers / Articles Published / Presented during the Year

9. List of Sponsorship / Consultancy / Project Work
10. Any other Assignments (Non – Academic Works) pertaining to:
(a) College :
(b) University :
(c) Any other Organization:
11. a) Appreciation / Awards / Recognition earned :
b) Disciplinary Actions faced :
12. Other activities Inside/Outside the campus towards development of self & students
13. Any other Information
14. Whether proficient with the rules, regulations and management systems: Yes No
15. Leave Details:
Period CL Loss of Pay Number of Late comings
Date Signature of the Faculty
a) REMARKS OF THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT AND POINTS AWARDED:

(Based on inter personal relationship with faculty members and students, specific contribution to the
department etc)
Signature of the HOD
b) REMARKS OF THE PRINCIPAL AND POINTS AWARDED:

(Based on specific contribution to the institutional and departmental activities, on-time completion etc)
STAFF APPRAISAL – POINTS EARNED:
Students University HOD Principal Total

Feedback- 25 Results- 50 15 10 100
Date: Signature of PRINCIPAL
5.9.Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)

Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and
contributions in teaching and learning and/or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc.
for all the assessment years:
o Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)
o Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired
professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year;3 marks x 3
years=9 marks)
SNO NAME DESIGNATION TOPIC

1 Dr RAMANA MURTHY SCIENTIST – F, ISRO SATTELITE EVALUATION
2 Dr SUBRAHMANYAM PROFESSOR KLU COMPUTER NETWORKS

CRITERION-6 Facilities and Technical Support 80
6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)
6.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)
Weekly
Number Technical Manpower Support
utilization
of Name of
Name of status(all
Sr. students the
the the courses Name of the
No per set Important
Laboratory for which Technical Designation Qualification
up(Batch Equipment
the lab is staff
Size)
utilized)
1 Computer 60 Computer 6 hours Md. Rafi Programmer M. Tech
Lab-1 System
2 Computer 60 Computer 6 hours K. Programmer MCA
Lab-2 System Venkateswrlu
3 Computer 60 Computer 6 hours N. Programmer M. Tech
Lab-3 System Venkateswara
Rao
6.2. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in laboratories
(25)
Areas in
which
students are Relevance
Sr. Facility Reason(s) for
Details Utilization expected to to
No Name creating facility
have POs/PSOs
enhanced
learning
HADOOP
1 Project Lab Computers Doing projects 6 hours per day PO4,PO5
AND JAVA
Cloud
computer DEPENDS UPON Cloud
2 Computers Projects PO4,PO5
Center of REQUIREMMENT Computing
Excellence
6.3. Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10)

To maintain the laboratories a departmental committee is constituted headed by head of the
department. This committee is responsible for maintenance. All the laboratories are maintained
periodically. Annual maintenance contract is given to the vendor for smooth maintenance of the
laboratory. In house maintenance is also carried out as per requirement. Overall ambience of the
laboratories is maintained.
Policy: Equipment is operated in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions and in a way which
minimizes the cost of repairs and maintenance.
Procedure:
1. Do’s and Don’ts and Safety measures rules are displayed in each laboratory.
2. Well Technical Staff are available for maintenance of Electronic equipments and software.
3. Department having four 10 KVA UPS, 240 VDC along with Batteries is used in case of power
failure in the PC system Labs.
4. Servicing of each laboratory is doing frequently.
5. Calibration of the each laboratory is done frequently.
6. Department having internet of 100 Mbps and Wi-Fi of 35 Mbps is maintained for students and
Faculty usage.
7. All necessary PC system regular software like Microsoft office, browser, lab software;
antivirus software etc, is installed and maintained.
Ambiance:
1. Department has Full furnished State of Art laboratories with well equipped equipments which
shall cater to all UG and PG courses as per curriculum requirements.
2. Conditions of chairs/benches are in good condition. Chair with desk are provided for individual
students in Labs.
3. Department has experienced faculty to educate them in all the fields of engineering.
4. All the labs are conducted and evaluated every week. .
5. Labs are equipped with sufficient hardware and licensed software to run program specific
curriculum and off program curriculum.
6. Laboratory manual are distributed to students.
7. Sufficient number of windows is available for ventilation and natural light and every lab has
one exit.
8. Lighting system is very effective, along with the natural light in every corner of the rooms.
9. Cup-boards are available in each lab for students to place their belongings.
10. Each Lab is equipped with white/black board, computer, Internet, and such other amenities.
11. Research laboratory/dept library is available 24X7 for all faculties and students to carry
research work and projects.
12. Exclusively, a project lab has been provided for the students to carry out their mini and major
project work.
Department
Name of the Type and serial number of Date PROBLEM responsible for Reasons
SNO Problem
Laboratory the Machine Reported SOLVED clearing the for delay
defect
ASIST/CC2/CPU-001 1/04/17
Mouse Computer
1 CSE- LAB I has SOLVED Maintenance
problem Department
ASIST/CC2/CPU-009
ASIST/CC2/CPU-010
Computer
2 CSE LAB-I No signal SOLVED Maintenance
Department
ASIST/CC2/CPU-015
ASIST/CC2/CPU-016
ASIST/CC2/CPU-017
ASIST/CC2/CPU-018
ASIST/CC2/CPU-019
ASIST/CC2/CPU-020
ASIST/CC2/CPU-021
ASIST/CC2/CPU-022
ASIST/CC2/CPU-023 Computer
6/6/17
3 CSE LAB-I ASIST/CC2/CPU-024 No power SOLVED Maintenance
16/6/17
ASIST/CC2/CPU-025 Department
ASIST/CC2/CPU-026
ASIST/CC2/CPU-027
ASIST/CC2/CPU-028
ASIST/CC2/CPU-029
ASIST/CC2/CPU-030
ASIST/CC2/CPU-031
ASIST/CC2/CPU-032
ASIST/CC2/CPU-033
ASIST/CC2/CPU-034
ASIST/CC2/CPU-035
ASIST/CC2/CPU-036
ASIST/CC2/CPU-037
Computer
ASIST/CC2/CPU-038 Power 16/6/17
4 CSE LAB-I SOLVED Maintenance
ASIST/CC2/CPU-039 problem 22/6/17
Department
ASIST/CC2/CPU-040
ASIST/CC2/CPU-041
ASIST/CC2/CPU-042
ASIST/CC2/CPU-043
Mother
Board Computer
5 and HDD SOLVED Maintenance
not Department
working
Mouse Computer
6 ASIST/CC2/CPU-046 has 22/6/17 SOLVED Maintenance
problem Department
Computer
7 ASIST/CC2/CPU-047 No signal 22/6/17 SOLVED Maintenance
Department
Mouse Computer
8 ASIST/CC2/CPU-048 has 22/6/17 SOLVED Maintenance
problem Department

ASIST/CC2/CPU-049
ASIST/CC2/CPU-050
ASIST/CC2/CPU-051
ASIST/CC2/CPU-052
Computer
9 restart SOLVED Maintenance
Department
ASIST/CC2/CPU-056
ASIST/CC2/CPU-057
ASIST/CC2/CPU-058
ASIST/CC2/CPU-059
ASIST/CC2/CPU-060
6.4. Project laboratory (5)

(Mention facilities & Utilization)
To do projects there is a LAB with 30 systems. The lab will be utilized by all the students who are
interested to do the projects in house. High speed Internet facility is always available to these systems.
The systems can support advanced software which are useful in projects.
A dedicated lab is there exclusively for the project works to be carried out by the students.
6.5.Safety measures in laboratories (10)
S. No Laboratory Name Safety Measures
1. If any problem arises with system report it to the lab in-

charge.
2. Keep all your files in one folder with proper password.
3. Sign in the log-out register before leaving the lab.
4. For any debugging, virus problems consult the programmer
for help.
5. Records and observations are get signed by the concerned
1 computer lab 1
staff on the same day.
6. Don’t leave the lab without correction of your day to day
work.
7. Don’t insert floppies, CDs and Pen drives without prior
permission.
8. Don’t tell your password to any other.
9. Don’t forget to turn off your system properly.
charge.
2 computer lab 2
for help.
work.


permission.
charge.
for help.
3 computer lab 3
work.
permission.

CRITERION-7 Continuous Improvement
7. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (50)
7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs &PSOs (20)
Identify the areas of weaknesses in the program based on the analysis of evaluation of POs & PSOs
attainment levels. Measures identified and implemented to improve POs & PSOs attainment levels for
the assessment years.
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2015-2016)
Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
PO 1 : Engineering Knowledge
Attainment is low in the following subjects Cryptography and
PO 1 68.12% 55.85%
network security, mobile computing
Observations: 1. Attainment level still it is 55.85% we need to improve 2.Students find it difficult to
solve computer organization concepts 3. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well understood
PO 2 : Problem Analysis
PO 2 58.86% 50.30%
PO 3 : Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 68.12% 55.85%
PO 4 : Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 69.12% 55.85%
PO 5 : Modern Tool Usage
Attainment is low in the following subjects Cryptography and network
PO 5 58.86% 51.30%
security, mobile computing
PO 6 : The Engineer and Society
PO 6 68.12% 55.85%

PO 7 : Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 58.86% 43.30%
PO 8 : Ethics
PO 8 68.12% 55.85%
PO 9 : Individual and Team Work
PO 9 58.86% 43.30%
PO 10 : Communication
PO 10 68.12% 55.85%
PO 11 : Project Management and Finance
PO 11 58.86% 43.30%
PO 12 : Life-long Learning
Attainment is low in the following subjects Cryptogr
PO 12 68.12% 55.85%
aphy and network security, mobile computing
Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
Data Structures, computer organization and automata
PO 1 68.12% 43.30%
theory
1. Attainment level still it is 43.30% we need to improve 2.Students find it difficult to solve
computer organization concepts 3. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well understood

Data Structures, computer organization and automata
PO 2 68.12% 43.30%
theory
1. Attainment level still it is 43.30% we need to improve 2.Students find it difficult to solve
computer organization concepts 3. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well understood
Attainment is low in the following subjects Data
PO 3 80% 70.72% Structures, computer organization and automata
theory
Observations : 1. Attainment level still it is 70.72% we need to improve 2 Students find it difficult
to solve computer organization problem
PO 4 65% 55.78% Structures, computer organization and automata
theory

PO 5 63.70% 58.33% Structures, computer organization and automata
theory
theory
Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is 30.50% we need to improve 2.Students find it difficult to
Attainment is low in the following subjects
PO 7 60.42% 34.50% Data Structures, computer organization and
automata theory
PO 8 : Ethics
automata theory

automata theory
automata theory
theory
automata theory
Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
PO 1 : Engineering Knowledge - Apply knowledge of mathematics and science, with fundamentals
of Computer Science & Engineering to be able to solve complex engineering problems related to
CSE.
Attainment is low in the following subjects Computer
PO 1 70.12% 65.85%
Organization, Distributed Systems and mobile computing
Observations:
1. Attainment level still it is 65.85% we need to improve
2. Students find difficult to solve problems in computer organization.
3. Addressing modes and instruction formats are not getting by the students.
PO 2 : Problem Analysis: Identify, Formulate, review research literature and analyze complex
engineering problems related to CSE and reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences


PO 2 62.86% 51.30%
Observations:
2. Students find it difficult to solve computer organization concepts
3. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well understood
PO 3 : Design/development of Solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems related
to CSE and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety and the cultural societal and environmental
considerations
PO 3 73.12% 66.85%
Observations:
PO 4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research–based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
PO 4 71.12% 56.85%
Observations:
PO 5 : Modern Tool Usage: Create, Select and apply appropriate techniques, resources and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to computer science related complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations
Attainment is low in the following subjects Computer Organization,
PO 5 58.86% 43.30%
Distributed Systems and mobile computing
PO 6 : The Engineer and Society: Apply Reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
CSE professional engineering practice
PO 6 68.12% 55.85%
PO 7 : Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the CSE professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development
PO 7 58.86% 43.30%

PO 8 : Ethics: Apply Ethical Principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice
PO 8 68.12% 55.85%
PO 9 : Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual and as a member or leader in
diverse teams and in multidisciplinary Settings
PO 9 58.86% 43.30%
PO 10 : Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large such as able to comprehend and with write effective
reports and design documentation, make effective presentations and give and receive clear
instructions.
PO 10 68.12% 55.85%
PO 11 : Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a
team, to manage projects and in multi-disciplinary environments
PO 11 58.86% 43.30%
PO 12 : Life-long Learning: Recognize the need for and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning the broadest context of technological change
PO 12 68.12% 55.85%
7.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
(Academic Audit system/process and its implementation in relation to Continuous Improvement)
Academic Audit
The Departments of any institution are the backbone of the core business of any institution where
trifocal activities i.e. teaching, research and service are conducted. An academic audit reviews the

processes and procedures used by Departments to enhance the quality of their Programs in terms of
program objectives and ensure graduate attributes as program outcomes as defined by each
Department are achieved against the stipulated targets for which standard practices and processes need
to be put in place.
Objectives of Academic Audit
The main objective of an academic audit is to ascertain departments have put in place adequate and
effective quality assurance mechanisms in terms of strategies, procedures, their applicability, that
ensures quality inputs and consequently quality outputs; their agility in ensuring continuous
improvements along with review of available resources, their optimal utilization, additional resource
requirements for providing quality education.
1) Unit of Audit
The primary unit of academic audit is the Department.
2) Focus Areas
(a) Defining intended Course and Program Outcomes
(b) Identifying curricular gaps and strategy to bridge the gaps
(c) Designing effective teaching and learning processes
(d) Developing and using outcome based student assessment
(e) Assuring implementation of quality education - significant activities such as research and
services, co- curricular and extracurricular activities to support program outcomes
3) Methodology
3.1 Approach
Institution creates various committees for conduct and review of activities at the institution and
department levels. The compositions, functions of the committees are as follows:
(a) Institutional Level Committee - Institution Assessment Core Committee (IACC)
Composition:
Chairman - Head of the Institution
Members - All HODs.
Special member - TPO, Member Secretary -
Broad Functions
 Contribute to preparation of SAR especially information related to institutional and finance
 Seek timeline and action plan from each department for Direct and Indirect assessment and
ensure its compliance.
 Interact with employers/industry/alumni and prepare manpower market analysis

 Conduct end of Semester analysis of results and achievement of POs/PSOs for all Departments
 Prepare annual report of success/failures on various parameters
 Taking corrective actions and additional inputs for meeting POs/PSOs
 Assessment and revision of PEOs
 Review of Institutional and Departmental Vision and Mission
 Present the analysis of all departments to the BOS/Management
 Develop faculty appraisal system and assess faculty performance annually; report to BOG
Frequency of Meetings
The committee should preferably meet twice a month, with agenda and action taken record
(b) Department Level Committees
1. Department Advisory Committee (DAC)
Composition
Chairman: HOD,
Faculty - Members and
Especial external members - (Alumni, Industry, Professional Society Representation).
Broad Functions
 Review assessment of Course Outcomes and their relationship with POs/PSOs prepared by
HODs
 HOD collects recommendations and suggestions and through department advisory committee
come out with implementable actions or items points for continuous improvements of POs and
PEOs
 HOD presents report to IACC with resource requirements and academic directions
Frequency of meeting
Meeting may be held at the end of the semester and report prepared.
(c) Program Assessment Committee
Composition:
Chairman - HOD
Members - All faculty
Broad Functions
 Prepare and finalize the PEOs and POs/PSOs, Align them with the Mission and write the
process of development of PEOs and POs
 Conduct assessment of placement record for ensuring PEOs attainments or revision if required
 Conduct assessment of curriculum and resources available to meet the developed PEOs and
POs, decide additional course contents, electives to bridge the gaps and inform the shortfalls in

resources to the Institutional Core Committee which will evaluate the needs and present the
additional requirement to the management
 Supervises the COs and their alignment to POs, assignments, tests, quiz, activities, Bloom’s
Taxonomy and ensures targets set by faculty are realistic.
 Develop common Performance Indicators for respective Courses aligned to the PO and ensures
the faculty develop activities, tests, quiz, assignments related to the common performance
indicators as well as for their course specific indicators
 Monitors progress periodically
 Develop a description of the process with questionnaires and tools required for continuous
assessment
 Develop faculty self-appraisal questionnaire and student feedback questionnaire
 Decide frequency of assessment of POs – internal and external
 Obtain COs from respective faculty for concerned PO along with their alignment with PO,
Bloom’s Taxonomy and target of expected achievements
 For direct assessment collects the student results for respective courses aligned to the PO and
analyze the average achievement of performance
 Hold discussions with concerned faculty on shortfalls for the achievement of pre-set targets.
 Collects recommendations for improvements
 Prepare and conduct indirect assessment and prepare report
 Record the results and presents to the IACC of direct and indirect assessment.
 Maintain and update website
Frequency of Meeting
Monthly monitoring and also at the end of semester
3.2 The Process

The Management through BOG will decide the main guidelines of academic audit indicating special
reference to investigation to be made about the various practices being followed by the departments.
The emphasis would remain on teaching, research and services. All attempts will be made to ensure
that continuous growth of all major parameters related to quality of education are achieved. The
achievement with specific reference to the plan of action related to PEOs and POs/PSOs will be
monitored. The BOG will authorize IACC to conduct the audit and collect information through
various records that may include the following:
 Department action plan and targets
 Minutes of Departmental meetings of various committees
 Record of content delivery through lectures, practical etc. and
 Result analysis semester/annual of courses in relation to set targets.
 Results and interpretation of indirect assessment
 Corrective action envisaged
 Recommendations of department Advisory Board
 Any other evidential material
3.3. Reporting
The purpose of academic audit is not judgmental but to cause development to happen. The IACC will
produce a report that describes the strengths and weaknesses of the each department’s efforts to
improve academic quality of their programs and identify plans for improvements. The main
components of the report will be:
 Recognition of Good practice
 Recognition of well performing departments
 Recommendations for improvement
The audit report is presented to the BOG and made available to the departments who will be required
to respond to the issues raised in the report. The response of the departments will be part of the final
audit report. The audit report shall be presented to BOG and thereafter displayed on
Department/institutional website.
7.3. Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship(10)

Assessment is based on improvement in:
Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc.
Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier
institutions
Entrepreneurs
Based on the evaluation and review of the attainment of POs, modification are done in the
program curriculum, aspects such as increase or decrease in the components of theory, practical,
project work, communication skills courses and elective courses are considered. In
addition, attempt is made to introduce new courses, labs, experiments, exercises for project work, etc
on the basis of external interaction with the industry and academia at seminars or conferences.
Some of the improvements that have been carried out in the past are listed below:
o Some new experiments have been added in the lab courses

o New elective courses have been added from time to time
Placement:
 We are conducting soft skill classes of aptitude, reasoning and to improve the communication
skill.
 For improvement in placement of the students expert lectures are arranged from the industry
exports.
 We are conducting mock test before any campus drive it includes technical interview, HR
interview and group discussion
Higher studies:
 We are motivating students to go for higher studies within India and Abroad.
 We encourage our students to appear and perform in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and
admissions in premier institutions
Entrepreneurs
 In our institute entrepreneurship development cell is organizing workshop on entrepreneurship.
 Through entrepreneurship development cell interaction with the entrepreneur is organized.
 Through entrepreneurship development cell competitions are arranged for new innovative
business ideas.
7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program(10)
Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level
entrances tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12th Standard and
percentage marks of the lateral entry students.
Entrance Examination) Closing Score/Rank 2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016

No. of Students admitted 118 118 117
State/University/Level Entrance
Examination/Others Opening Score/Rank 22787 11172 11172
AP EAMCET
Closing Score/Rank 138956 156765 136892
Name of the Entrance No. of Students admitted 0 0 1
Examination for Lateral Entry
Opening Score/Rank 0 0 2587
or lateral entry details
APECET Closing Score/Rank 0 0 2587
Average CBSE/Any other Board Result of admitted

118 100 83
students (Physics, Chemistry & Mathematics)

CRITERION-8 : FIRST YEARACADEMICS (50)
8.1.First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR)(5)
Assessment =(5×15)/Average FYSFR(Limited to Max.5) Data for first year courses to calculate the
FYSFR:
Number of faculty
Number of students members
Year FYSFR
(approved intake strength) (considering fractional
load)
2015-2016 540 32 15
2016-2017 540 36 15
2017-2018 540 36 15
Average 15
Assessment= (5 ×
15)/Average 5.0
FYSFR (Limited to Max. 5)
8.2.Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses (5)
Assessment of qualification=(5x+3y)/RF,x=Number of Regular Faculty with Ph.D, y=Number of

Regular Faculty with Post-graduate qualification RF=Number of faculty members required as per SFR
of 15:1, Faculty definition as defined in5.1
Assessment of faculty
Year X Y RF
qualification (5x + 3y)/RF
2015-2016 7 38 32 4.65
2016-2017 7 38 32 4.65
2017-2018 7 38 36 4.13
Average Assessment 4.47
8.3.First Year Academic Performance(10)
Academic Performance= ((Mean of 1stYear Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10
point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful students/10))x (number
of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination). Successful students are those
who are permitted to proceed to the second year.

8.30 7.60 8.10
Total Number of successful students(Y) 64.00 89.00 56.00
Total Number of students appeared in the
119.00 106.00 80.00
examination(Z)
API [X*(Y/Z)] 4.46 6.38 5.67
Average API[ (AP1+AP2+AP3)/3 ] : 5.50
Assessment [ 1.5 * Average API] : 5.50
8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses (10)
8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
Course Outcomes of first year is done (5)
(Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam questions,
laboratory tests, internally developed assessment exams, oral exams assignments, presentations,
tutorial sheets etc.)
Scheme and Syllabus (Subject wise) is provided by the University. We have developed our co all
course outcomes are developed using Bloom taxonomy and consequently assignments tests quiz
practical and internal exams and projects are aligned to the Cos addressing the same levels of Blooms
Taxonomy. Each unit covers one or two Cos, generally 1st unit covers Remembering and
understanding level, 2nd unit cover applying level, 3rd unit covers analysing level, 4th and
5th unit covers Evaluating and creating level. But it may vary from subject to subject. Some
subjects may cover only four level, some may five or all six levels. For evaluation of Cos well
defined statistical technique is used to map the question with the CO and mapping with the POs
and PSOs. Since the question wise results of students from university are not available, analysis of
CO with question is limited to internal examinations, assessment of lab practical, assignments, quiz
only.
 Students have taken R16 regulation stipulated by JNTUK
 Two Internal tests for maximum mark of 30 are conducted. The final internal
marks have been assessed 80% of maximum internal marks of both exams and
20% of minimum marks of both internal exams.
 The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to the CO’s is
recorded.
2017-18  End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum mark of
70 is considered for external exam performance.
 The summation of these two performances is considered as cumulative
assessment for a prescribed course out come.
 The laboratory assessment is evaluated for 75 marks. 75 marks are divided into 25
as internal assessment and 50 marks as external assessment. The internal
 Students
assessment 25 taken
have is further
R16divided intostipulated
regulation day to day
byperformance
JNTUK – 10, record – 5 and
 Two
internal examination-10.
Internal tests for maximum mark of 30 are conducted. The final internal
marks have been assessed 80% of maximum internal marks of both exams and
20% of minimum marks of both internal exams.
2016-17 recorded.
 End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum mark of
70 is considered for external exam performance.
assessment 25 is further divided into day to day performance – 10, record – 5 and

 Students have taken R13 regulation stipulated by JNTUK
 Two Internal tests for maximum mark of 30 are conducted. Best of those two tests
is being finalized as internal assessment.
recorded.
 End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum mark of
2015-16 70 is considered for external exam performance.
assessment 25 is further divided into day to day performance – 10, record – 5 and
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (5)
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses. (The attainment levels shall be set
considering average performance levels in the university examination or any higher value set as target
for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in
internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the University
examination)
2017-2018
Subject Sem PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Maths - I 1st 1.7 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.6 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0
English 1st 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.4 0.5 1.6 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4
Applied Chemistry 1st 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.1 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.2
Engineering drawing 1st 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.6 1.6 1.6
Computer programming 1st 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.2
Maths - II 2nd 1.7 1.4 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.5 1.1 1.1 1.1
Environmental Studies 2nd 1.2 1.2 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.2
Applied Physics 2nd 1.9 1.6 0.8 1.6 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.5 1.6 1.6 1.6
Engineering mechanics 2nd 1.6 1.2 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.2
Maths-III 2nd 1.4 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.1
8.5.Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses (20)

8.5.1.Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable(15)
The relevant program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the
institution. Program Outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant POs and/or PSOs through
first year courses. (Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the
Program Outcomes are attained through first year courses and document the attainment levels. Also
include information on assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each
Program Outcome is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)

POs Attainment:
co1 0.00 2.59 2.00 2.39 1.72 1.46 2.32 1.98 2.42 1.73 2.86 2.20
co2 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.86 2.32 2.16 1.10 1.36 1.92 2.32 2.86
co3 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.78 1.42 2.36 1.91 2.24 1.32 1.98 2.85
co4 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.9 2.9 1.98 2.36 1.92 2.34 1.56 2.12 2.90
PO Attainment Level
Direct Attainment 2.14 2.79 2.64 2.75 2.56 1.80 2.30 1.73 2.09 1.63 2.32 2.70
CO Attainment 2.14 2.79 2.64 2.75 2.56 1.80 2.30 1.73 2.09 1.63 2.32 2.70
PSOs Attainment:

co1 2.85 2.14 2.36
co2 2.56 1.16 1.15
co3 2.34 2.85 2.36
co4 2.18 2.39 2.56
PSO Attainment Level

Direct Attainment 2.48 2.14 2.11
CO Attainment 2.48 2.14 2.11
8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)
(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through Program level
Course-PO matrix as indicated)

Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
Attainment is low in the following subjects: Mathematics-1,
Engineering Physics
PO 1 80% 70.72% Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is 70% we need to
improve 2 Students find it difficult to solve integration
problems.
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce more number of methods in Mathematics-1.
2. More Engineering Physics to be taught in tutorial classes 3. Practical approach of teaching
programming to be adapted. 4. More problems will be given for practice for automata theory

Engineering Physics and Mathematics-II and Engineering
Mechanics.
PO 2 65% 55.78%
Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is 55.78% we need to
problems.
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2.More computer
organization to be taught in tutorial classes
Engineering Physics and Mathematics-II
PO 3 80% 70.72% Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is 70.72% we need to
problems.
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2. More computer
organization to be taught in tutorial classes 3. Practical approach of teaching programming to be
adapted. 4. More problems will be given for practice for automata theory
Mechanics.
PO 4 65% 55.78%
problems.
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2.More computer
Mechanics.
PO 5 63.70% 58.33%
problems.
Actions 1.Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2.More computer
organization to be taught in tutorial classes 3. Practical approach of teaching programming to be
adapted.
Mechanics.
PO 6 57.37% 30.50%
problems.

Mechanics.
PO 7 60.42% 34.50%
problems.
PO 8 : Ethics
Attainment is low in the following subjects Data Structures,
computer organization and automata theory Observations:
PO 8 53.43% 43.06% 1.Atainement level still it is 43% we need to improve
2.Students find it difficult to solve computer organization
concepts 3. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well
1.Atainement level still it is 45% we need to improve
PO 9 58.05% 45.05%
understood
1.Atainement level still it is 72% we need to improve
PO 10 65.73% 72.70%
understood
concepts
Action 1: 1. More problems will be given for practice

Attainment
Pos Target Level Observations
Level
Structures, computer organization and automata
PO 1 80% 70.72% theory Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is
43% we need to improve 2.Students find it
difficult to solve computer organization concepts
Actions 1.Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2.More
computer organization to be taught in tutorial classes
PO 2 80% 70.72% theory Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is
70% we need to improve 2 Students find it
difficult to solve computer organization problems
PO 3 80% 70.72% theory Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is
70% we need to improve 2 Students find it
difficult to solve computer organization problems
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2. More
computer organization to be taught in tutorial classes 3. Practical approach of teaching
programming to be adapted. 4. More problems will be given for practice for automata theory


PO 4 65% 55.78% theory Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2.More
theory Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is
PO 5 63.70% 58.33% 58% we need to improve 2.Students find it
3. Basic knowledge of addressing modes not well
understood
programming to be adapted.
understood
PO 7 60.42% 34.50% theory Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is
PO 8 : Ethics

PO 8 53.43% 43.06%


understood
understood
PO 11 58.86% 43.30% theory Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is
PO 12 68.12% 55.85%
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement-(2017-2018)
Pos Target Level Attainment Observations

Level
PO 1: Engineering Knowledge


PO 1 80% 70.72%
43% we need to improve 2.Students find it difficult
to solve computer organization concepts
PO 2: Problem Analysis
PO 2 80% 70.72%
theory Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is
70% we need to improve 2 Students find it difficult
to solve computer organization problems

PO 3: Design/development of Solutions

PO 3 80% 70.72%
theory Observations : 1.Atainement level still it is
70% we need to improve 2 Students find it difficult
to solve computer organization problems
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2. More

PO 4: ConducttoInvestigations
programming of Complex
be adapted. 4. More Problems
problems will be given for practice for automata theory
PO 4 65% 55.78%
to solve computer organization concepts
Actions 1. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce data structures concepts 2.More
PO 5: Modern Tool Usage


PO 5 63.70% 58.33%
to solve computer organization concepts 3. Basic
knowledge of addressing modes not well understood
programming to be adapted.
PO 6 :The Engineer and Society
PO 6 57.37% 30.50%
to solve computer organization concepts 3. Basic
knowledge of addressing modes not well
understood
PO 7: Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 60.42% 34.50%
theory Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is 34%
we need to improve 2.Students find it difficult to
solve computer organization concepts
PO 8: Ethics to be taught in tutorial classes
organization
PO 8 53.43% 43.06%
Structures, computer organization and automata theory
Observations: 1.Atainement level still it is 43% we
need to improve 2.Students find it difficult to solve
computer organization concepts 3. Basic knowledge of
addressing modes not well
PO 9: Individual and Team Work


PO 9 58.05% 45.05%
addressing modes not well understood
PO 10: Communication
PO 10 65.73% 72.70%
addressing modes not well understood
PO 11: Project Management and Finance

PO 11 58.86% 43.30%
computer organization concepts

PO 12:Life-long Learning
PO 12 68.12% 55.85%
addressing modes not well

CRITERION-9 Student Support Systems 50
9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50)
9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (5)

Type of mentoring: Professional guidance/ career advancement/course work specific/ laboratory
specific/ all-round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of students per mentor:
Frequency of meeting:
(The institution may report the details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the
students for various purposes and also state the efficacy of such system)
 Mentoring System : Yes
 Type of Mentoring : Total Development
 Number of faculty mentors : 32
 Number of students per mentor : 20
 Frequency of meeting : Weekly
Details of the mentoring system
A faculty mentor is assigned to a group of 20 students to deal with their problems the mentor
maintains record of students. The mentor observes the overall growth of student and provides
counseling whenever required the mentor also makes sure to maintain a regular parent-teacher
dialogue.
Efficiency of such system
The system develops an interaction among the students, teachers and parents. The system helps to
improve the academic performance of the students. The system provides scope for healthy,
positive and stress free state of mind. Teachers are also becoming more responsive to the learner
needs day by day which is being reflected in the proctor diary maintained by the teacher. The
mentors meet the students periodically and monitor their performance and their activities.
Guidance regarding the lagging issues is provided. Occasionally tutor meeting with the parents is
conducted based on the requirement.
Professional Guidance:
The department is well equipped with knowledgeable Human resources in the form of members of
faculty who by keeping themselves of development, offer guidance to the prospective
professionals in addition to the classroom teaching. The Industry- institute Partnership cell and
Entrepreneurship development cell have been putting efforts in this direction.
Career advancement:
The Training and Placement cell has been active not only in arranging campus recruitment drives,
but also offering awareness and training for the students Course work. Members of faculty

handling different courses interact with students in clearing all their Concept-oriented and test
based mechanics of the respective courses. The teachers after first of formative evaluation guide
the students as far as student- specific gray areas are concerned.
Lab-specific:
Each of the lab sessions are handled by 3 Teachers in order to have special care for the students
while experiments are being handled. A demonstrative presentation is given by the teacher
concerned before every experiment. The Laboratory records are evaluated after the experiment is
held. In other words, there is active involvement of the members of faculty Pre-experiment stage,
at the time of experiment and after the experiment.
Total Development:
As stated above, the college puts forward efforts to realize total development of the student. In
addition to academics, literary, cultural and sports activities are conducted which offer leadership
qualities, decision making abilities, team spirit, precision, analytical capabilities, socio-
psychological awareness etc. which make an individual a intellectually mature being.
9.2. Feedback analysis and reward/corrective measures taken, if any (10)

Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process; Average
Percentage of students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis of reward/
corrective measures, if any; Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary
of the index values for all courses/teachers; Number of corrective actions taken.
Feedback collected for all courses (Yes/No): Yes
Specify the feedback collection process:

A standard feedback questionnaire is collected from the students every mid-semester course wise.
At the end of semester, department conduct end course survey in order to take the feedback about
the facilitators as well about the effectiveness of course.
Number of Feedback Items : 08.
Number of Feedback levels : 01 to 05.
Space for descriptive feedback/suggestion etc : Yes.
Any consistency check? : Yes.
Any performance/attendance profile : Yes.
Frequency of feedback collection : Once in a semester.
Feedback collection Hard-copy : Yes.
Average percentage of students who participates : 80%

Feedback analysis Process:
1. The feedback analysis is done manually
2. Collected feedback is scrutinized by the Assessment Committee-Program.
3. The feedback is quantified
4. All the parameters mentioned in the feedback form will be analyzed.
5. Ability of teaching with respect to each item and comprehensive ability of the teachers will be
analyzed
6. All the comments written by the students in the feedback forms will be communicated to the
respective faculty members along with their feedback levels to know their strengths and
weaknesses and to enhance their teaching skills.
Basis of reward/corrective measure:
1. Faculty members who get average feedback below 3 on 1-5 scale are identified and provided
with induction program and faculty development program in specified area.
2. Also the faculty members who get feedback more than 75% are appreciated by management
during Annual function
9.3. Feedback on facilities (5)
Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken.
Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken. Assessment
is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken
1. Student’s feedback on facilities such as class room ambiance, furniture, OHP and tablet is
satisfactory.
2. Student’s feedback on facilities such as library, no of books to be increased. We have increase
purchase of books for central library.
3. Student’s feedback on facilities such as speed of internet to be improved. We have increased
the band width.
Methodology of Appraisal
Based on the feedback forms carried out following methodology is adapted
Table-WEIGHTAGE MATRIX
Ex
Subject Student Co-Curricular
Category HOD curricular Administration Total
Pass% feedback activities
activities
Staff 35 30 15 10 10 --- 100
HOD 30 20 20 10 10 10 100
VP --- 30 25 25 10 10 100

9.4. Self-Learning (5)
(The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning/ learning beyond
syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness)
 The curriculum offers courses like self-study, mini project, major projects where the topics are
self-selected or based on guide suggestion. The component of self-learning is evaluated in
these courses.
 Seminars, conference, workshop & guest lecturers were organized.
 In every lecture 5-10 minutes discussion on new technology and its application in real life that
is beyond the syllabus occasionally Past year projects & working models are made available to
students for improvement & innovation
 Every student has to submit a home assignment in every course which has been evaluated for
10 marks. Some of these tasks are beyond syllabus to encourage out- standing students to
develop their self-learning capabilities.
 Some of the tasks in the lab courses are challenge based which has to be solved by the students
on their own enhancing their skills.
 Department library with sufficient number of volumes on core and application areas,
technology awareness journals are opened during college working hours. A state of art
Research & Development laboratory is opened for the students to develop applications and
projects.
 E-notes has been prepared by the department faculty and maintained by the department faculty
for the development of students for all subjects in our department. We have appointed a faculty
coordinator for digital library for the development of student knowledge for updating their
curriculum
 Apart from the above, the college actively promotes self-learning through the following
resources procured through NPTEL, QEEE and other Audio-Video content:
Following video lectures by the NPTEL for the benefit of the students
Subject Id Discipline Name Subject Name Coordinators Institute
Prof. Abhiram G Ranade,
Computer Science Design and Analysis of
106101060 Prof. Ajit A Diwan,Prof. IIT Bombay
and Engineering Algorithms
Sundar Viswanathan
Prof. Rushikesh K
Computer Science
106101061 Software Engineering Joshi,Prof. Umesh IIT Bombay
and Engineering
Bellur,Prof. N.L. Sarda
Computer Science
106102062 Computer Architecture Prof. Anshul Kumar IIT Delhi
and Engineering
106102064 Computer Science Data Structures And Prof. Naveen Garg IIT Delhi


Computer Science Introduction to Computer
106102065 Prof. Prem K Kalra IIT Delhi
and Engineering Graphics
Computer Science Principles of Programming
106102067 Prof. S. Arun Kumar IIT Delhi
and Engineering Languages
Computer Science
106104120 Parallel Algorithm Prof. Phalguni Gupta IIT Kanpur
and Engineering
Design Verification and
Computer Science Prof. Jatindra Kumar
106103116 Test of Digital VLSI IIT Guwahati
and Engineering Deka,Dr. Santosh Biswas
Circuits
Computer Science
106104019 Computer Algorithms - 2 Prof. Shashank K. Mehta IIT Kanpur
and Engineering
Computer Science Introduction to Problem
106104074 Prof. D. Gupta IIT Kanpur
and Engineering Solving and Programming
Computer Science Cryptography and Network Dr. Debdeep
106105031 IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering Security Mukhopadhyay
Computer Science
106105036 Real Time Systems Prof. Rajib Mall IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering
Computer Science Prof. Anupam Basu,Prof. S.
106105077 Artificial Intelligence IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering Sarkar
Computer Science
106105079 Artificial Intelligence Prof. P. Dasgupta IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering
Computer Science
106105081 Computer Networks Prof. Sujoy Ghosh IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering
Computer Science
106105082 Data Communication Prof. Ajit Pal IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering
Computer Science
106105084 Internet Technology Prof. Indranil Sengupta IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering
Computer Science Programming and Data
106105085 Dr. P.P.Chakraborty IIT Kharagpur
and Engineering Structure
Computer Science Performance Evaluation of Prof. Krishna Moorthy
106106048 IIT Madras
and Engineering Computer Systems Sivalingam
Theory of Automata,
Computer Science
106106049 Formal Languages and Prof. Kamala Krithivasan IIT Madras
and Engineering
Computation
Computer Science
106106090 Computer Graphics Prof. Sukhendu Das IIT Madras
and Engineering
Computer Science
106106092 Computer Organization Prof. S. Raman IIT Madras
and Engineering
Computer Science Prof. D. Janaki Ram,Dr. S.
106106093 Database Design IIT Madras
and Engineering Srinath
Computer Science Discrete Mathematical
106106094 Prof. Kamala Krithivasan IIT Madras
and Engineering Structures
Computer Science
106108052 Compiler Design Prof. Y.N. Srikanth IISc Bangalore
and Engineering
106108054 Computer Science Graph Theory Dr. L. Sunil Chandran IISc Bangalore

and Engineering
Computer Science High Performance
106108055 Prof. Mathew Jacob IISc Bangalore
and Engineering Computing
Computer Science
106108056 Numerical Optimization Dr. Shirish K. Shevade IISc Bangalore
and Engineering
Computer Science System Analysis and
106108102 Prof. V. Rajaraman IISc Bangalore
and Engineering Design
MOOCS
Computer Science Design and Analysis of
DAA Prof. C Pratap Programme by
JNTUK
MOOCS
Computer Science
WT Web Technologies TCS Consultants Programme by
and Engineering
JNTUK
MOOCS
Computer Science Database Management
DBMS Prof. D Janikiram Programme by
and Engineering Systems
JNTUK
MOOCS
Computer Science Prof. D. Jankiram,
BDA Big Data Analytics Programme by
and Engineering I.I.T.Chennai.
JNTUK
9.5. Career Guidance, Training, Placement (10)

(The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance
including counseling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for
training/internship/placement, etc.)
The Career guidance cell and Training & Placement department in coordination with Student section
Counsellors keeps students abreast with the opportunities of higher studies on regular basis. Posters,
circulars of all such opportunities are displayed on T&P notice board. The team for Career counseling
comprises of:
Career Guidance and Training activities conducted in 2017-2018
Date-
S. Resource Person with % of
Program Organized Month-
No Designation students
Year
Sri. K Gopala Reddy,
1 Special Training Programme 28-11-2017 90
Associate Professor, Dept
on Coding using C
of CSE, ASIST
Sri. K Gopala Reddy,
2 Special Training programme 09-11-2017 90
Associate Professor, Dept
on “Databases”
of CSE, ASIST
Training Programme on Sri. P Ramesh Babu,
3 Computer Networks and 24-11-2017 Associate Professor, Dept 90
Computer Organization of CSE, ASIST
4 Programme on “Resume 28/09/2017 Sri. K. Rohit, Innogeecks 90

Writing” Technologies, Vijayawada

Training Programme on 24-08-2017 Sri. Md. Rafi, Innogeecks

5 to 90
Aptitude 05-09-2017 Technologies, Vijayawada
Training Programme on Soft 24-08-2017 Sri. K. Rohit, Innogeecks

6 to 90
Skills 05-09-2017 Technologies, Vijayawada

Date-
S. Resource Person with % of
Program Organized Month-
No Designation students
Year
Ms. P Pavani, Assistant
Expert talk on Big data &
1 26-02-2016 Professor, Dept of CSE, 90
Android
ASIST
Mr. K Krishna,
Training on computer
2 12-09-2015 Vision Technologies 90
Hardware
Vijayawada
Sri. T Shankar, Trainer,
3 Expert Talk on Bluemix 18-08-2015 Jawahar Knowledge 90
Centre, Hyderabad

S. Date- Resource Person with % of
No Program Organized Month- Designation students
Year
Sri. M Satya Ratnam,
1 Expert Talk on Android 20-12-2014 Krishna Dist JKC 85
Coordinator, JKC
Sri. M Satya Ratnam,
2 Expert Talk on SQL 19-12-2014 Krishna Dist JKC 90
Coordinator, JKC
Sk Khadar Baba,
Tainting on Office Automation
3 12-12-2014 Purple Techno Solutions, 90
Tools
Vijayawada
Placement – List of Companies and total students selected
List of selected students in On-campus in 2016-2017
S. No Regd No Name of the Student Company
1. 13AJ1A0501 A. SWATHI PRIYA MAINTEC
2. 13AJ1A0503 A. NAVYASREE MAINTEC
3. 13AJ1A0518 CH. SOWJANYA INNOEYE
4. 13AJ1A0543 K NAVYA INNOEYE
5. 13AJ1A0570 M. SAI KIRAN TRIBRO SOFT TECH
6. 13AJ1A0508 B. RAMANJANEYULU TRIBRO SOFT TECH
7. 13AJ1A0550 M.JYOTHI MAINTEC
8. 13AJ1A0573 S.S.N.SAI DEEKSHA MAINTEC
9. 13AJ1A0571 S.LEELA RANI MAINTEC
10. 13AJ1A0562 P.LAKSHMI MANASA MAINTEC
11. 13AJ1A0570 M. SAI KIRAN MAINTEC
12. 13AJ1A0536 K. NAGA MANI GAMMA
13. 13AJ1A0507 A. SUKANYA GAMMA

14. 13AJ1A0563 P. NAVYA GAMMA
15. 13AJ1A0539 K. DURGA BHAVANI GAMMA
16. 13AJ1A0578 V. SAI SOWJANYA GAMMA
17. 13AJ1A0579 V. TEJASWARI GAMMA
18. 13AJ1A0501 A. SWATHI PRIYA GAMMA
19. 13AJ1A0527 D. RAMYA KRISHNA GAMMA
20. 13AJ1A0503 A. NAVYASREE GAMMA
21. 13AJ1A0524 D. HANUSHA RANI GAMMA
22. 13AJ1A0549 M.SINDHURA INNOEYE
23. 13AJ1A0509 B.TRIVENI INNOEYE
24. 13AJ1A0507 A.SUKANYA PAYTM
25. 13AJ1A0524 D.HANUSHA RANI AVONTIX
26. 13AJ1A0552 MD. HAFIZUNISSA FLIPKART
27. 13AJ1A0518 CH. SOWJANYA FLIPKART
28. 13AJ1A0543 K. NAVYA FLIPKART
29. 13AJ1A0509 B.TRIVENI FLIPKART
30. 13AJ1A0537 K.CHANDRAVATHI FLIPKART
31. 13AJ1A0528 D.MANASA FLIPKART
32. 13AJ1A0566 R.V.PADMA FLIPKART
33. 12AJ1A0532 K. BALA BHARGAVA IBEON
34. 13AJ1A0579 V. TEJESHWARI IBEON
35. 13AJ1A0557 N. LAKSHMI PRASSANNA IBEON
36. 13AJ1A0563 P. NAVYA AXIUS
37. 13AJ1A0547 M.LAVANYA EFFTRONICS
38. 13AJ1A0566 R.VENKATA PADMA EFFTRONICS
39. 13AJ1A0504 CH.SOWJANYA EFFTRONICS
40. 13AJ1A0543 K.NAVYA EFFTRONICS
41. 13AJ1A0555 N.NALINI EFFTRONICS
List of selected students in On-campus of 2015-2016

S. No Regd No Name of the Student Company
42. 12AJ1A0501 A.KEERTHANA MAINTEC
43. 12AJ1A0510 CH.SOWMYA MAINTEC
44. 12AJ1A0517 D.TULASI SRAVYA MAINTEC
45. 12AJ1A0523 G.NAGA SUNITHA MAINTEC
46. 12AJ1A0525 G.RAVALI MAINTEC
47. 12AJ1A0538 K.HYNDAVI MAINTEC
48. 12AJ1A0576 Y.RAMYA MAINTEC
49. 12AJ1A0508 B.ANURADHA INFOSYS
50. 12AJ1A0513 CH.RAMYA INFOSYS
51. 12AJ1A0533 K.SRUJANA INFOSYS
52. 12AJ1A0538 K.HYNDAVI INFOSYS
53. 12AJ1A0517 D.TULASI SRAVYA WIPRO
54. 12AJ1A0523 G.NAGA SUNITHA WIPRO
55. 12AJ1A0519 D.SINDHURA WIPRO
56. 12AJ1A0548 M.AHALYA WIPRO
57. 12AJ1A0576 Y.RAMYA WIPRO
58. 12AJ1A0540 K.SOWJANYA DELL
59. 12AJ1A0531 K.SAILJA DELL
60. 12AJ1A0526 G.SAI GIRIDHAR DELL
61. 12AJ1A0527 I.LAKSHMI DELL
62. 12AJ1A0517 D.TULASI SRAVYA POLARIS
63. 12AJ1A0548 M.AHALYA POLARIS
64. 12AJ1A0542 K.GURU KIRAN POLARIS
65. 12AJ1A0564 S.PAVAN KUMAR POLARIS
66. 12AJ1A0563 S.SIVARAM PRASAD POLARIS
67. 12AJ1A0536 K.RADHA AXIUS
68. 12AJ1A0516 D.SRUTHI AXIUS
69. 12AJ1A0515 SIRISHA AXIUS
70. 12AJ1A0577 Y.LAVANYA AXIUS
71. 12AJ1A0501 KEERTHANA AXIUS
72. 12AJ1A0562 S.MOUNICA AXIUS
73. 12AJ1A0551 CHAITANYA AXIUS
74. 12AJ1A0528 MANASA AXIUS
75. 12AJ1A0534 K.BHARGAVI AXIUS
76. 12AJ1A0536 K.RADHA AVONTIX
77. 12AJ1A0515 N.SIRISHA AVONTIX
78. 12AJ1A0508 B.ANURADHA AVONTIX
79. 12AJ1A0548 M.AHALYA AVONTIX
80. 12AJ1A0502 G.PRATHYUSHA AVONTIX
81. 12AJ1A0503 A.DHANA NAVYA AVONTIX
82. 12AJ1A0516 D.SRUTHI AVONTIX
83. 12AJ1A0522 G.SAHITHI AVONTIX
84. 12AJ1A0510 CH.SOWMYA STSII
85. 12AJ1A0517 D. TULASI SRAVYA INFOVIEW
86. 12AJ1A0540 K. SOWJANYA INFOVIEW
87. 12AJ1A0552 N.MOUNIKA SOLVERMINDS
88. 12AJ1A0513 CH.RAMYA SOLVERMINDS
89. 12AJ1A0549 M.GUPTA PRASAD SOLVERMINDS
90. 12AJ1A0509 BELLAMKONDA JYOSNA SOLVERMINDS
91. 12AJ1A0530 K.NAVYASREE SOLVERMINDS
92. 12AJ1A0562 S.MOUNIKA SOLVERMINDS
93. 12AJ1A0508 B.ANURADHA SOLVERMINDS
94. 12AJ1A0538 K.HYNDAVI SOLVERMINDS
95. 12AJ1A0539 K.NIKITHA MALLI SOLVERMINDS
96. 12AJ1A0546 RANJITH SOLVERMINDS
97. 12AJ1A0576 Y.RAMYA SOLVERMINDS
98. 12AJ1A0544 K.VISHNU SAI SARAN SOLVERMINDS
99. 13AJ5A0502 G. PRATHYUSHA GOOD THROUGH
100. 12AJ1A0509 B. JYOSHTNA IONIDEA
101. 12AJ1A0510 CH. SOWMYA IONIDEA
102. 12AJ1A0501 K.N.L. KEERTHANA IONIDEA
S. No. Name Particulars

1 Mr. P Chiranjeevi CGC Head
2 Mr. D N V S K Pavan Kumar Training In charge
3 Mr. P Anil Kumar Departmental coordinator
4 Mr. P Ramesh Babu Placement Officer
5 Smt. Parveena Career guidance Counsellor
Functions of the Committee
1. To arrange Seminars / Workshops on Career opportunities
2. To arrange GATE/GRE/TOEFL / IELTS / GMAT / CAT coaching classes.
3. To conduct mock tests for competitive examinations.
4. To arrange interactive sessions between alumni and students.
5. To procure study material and make it available in the Library/Intranet.
6. Display of Posters, Notices relating to Opportunities
9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell (5)

(The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging
entrepreneurship and incubation)(Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be mentioned)
In our institute entrepreneurship development cell is organizing workshop on entrepreneurship.
Through entrepreneurship development cell interaction with the entrepreneur is organized. Through
entrepreneurship development cell competitions are arranged for new innovative business ideas.
Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility

The entrepreneurship Development Cell has been organizing workshops and seminar for the benefit
of students. The EDC Cell invites speaker, Entrepreneurs to share their experiences and also
invites professionals from Banks, Federation of Commerce and Industry to motivate and educate
students on Entrepreneurship.
Vision and Ideology of the E-Cell

a. Vision
To stimulate, support and sustain all initiatives and endeavors of students, which will lead to
generation of entrepreneurship based on Engineering and Technology
b. Ideology
 To motivate and inspire students to take up the challenge of entrepreneurship
 To equip them with necessary skills and provide all possible assistance
 To promote creative thinking and an entrepreneurial mindset among the students
 To promote innovations and help convert them into market accepted Products
3. Activities undergoing in E- Cell:
The E-cell Organizes lectures, workshops and seminars by renowned personalities from different
domains of expertise, competitions of various kinds etc. round-the-year in order to create
awareness and to sharpen business acumen of students and aspiring entrepreneurs. Mentor students /
new faculties who have business ideas by bringing expertise to their doorsteps.
The E-cell is network hub for students aspiring to be entrepreneurs and also play a role in team
building as a part of its mentorship. Mentoring the students at an early stage by giving proper
direction and necessary exposure would be crucial in converting technical ideas/projects into
viable business plans It is an interface between the entrepreneurial activity in institute and the
outside world, a consolidation of logistic and knowledge resources necessary to make a business plan
and set up an enterprise. Form permanent associations with professional bodies and
organizations, Universities, corporations, media etc. to facilitate exchange of ideas and to promote
entrepreneurial ventures. Knowledge partnerships will play an important role in engaging good
expertise for the benefit of entrepreneurial activity at institute. Associations with venture capital
firms and seed funds would be crucial in the setup of new ventures. To achieve the above objectives
the E-Cell will focus on some initiatives to foster the spirit of entrepreneurship in the following
steps:
Initiative -1:
Innovation Platform: It is aimed at nurturing innovation at the grassroots level, it is an organized
group of selected students getting together to discuss each other’s ideas. This discussion is now
being done on a wiki page. The discussion helps the students stay motivated to work on their idea
as well as helps build their idea into something feasible.
Initiative -2: In-house Events/competition:
To motivate student towards entrepreneurship, e-Cell will regularly conduct in-house competition of
various events such as business idea competition, case study competition, Business quiz, brand watch,
innovation approach, best out- of- waste competition, innovation approaches in IT industry,
new ventures lunched and their idea and profile, story writing of successful entrepreneur, Expose the
youth to the latest innovations and entrepreneurial success stories etc.
Initiative -3:
To connect the students with the start-ups through which start-ups get an opportunity to interact
with the students and pitch their ideas to the panel of Venture Capitalists and the students get
hired for summer internships.
Initiative -4: Promote E-Cell Brand
For Smooth functioning of E-cell and carry out strategic planning with aligning our vision and
mission and promote of E-cell, we should have team of following:
a. Patron Organization
Our endeavor will be find and make partner with National Entrepreneurship Network(
NEN),Department of Science and Technology, The Indus Entrepreneurs( TiE),NASSCOM,FICCI etc.
This will help to improve the brand value of Rungta Group as well as E-Cell of the Institutes.

b. Association with VC Panel
The VC PANEL will consist of leading Venture Capitalist firms of India which will support
entrepreneurial activity and innovation by financing new or growing businesses. The VC firms
associated with E-Cell will not only involved in financing the start ups, but also mentor the 'to be
entrepreneurs' and share their extensive knowledge and experiences. Their encouraging
involvements in E-cell activities will one of the major sources of inspiration and E-Cell will attain
new heights under their guidance and support.
c. Association with Corporate Panel:
Every entrepreneur knows the thrill of a great idea. They’ve felt the pride of nurturing a vision and
watching it grow. So, when it comes time for them to fly, they want people who share that spirit and
know what it takes to make a company succeed. Whether you are seeking investment to get your
idea off the ground or looking to fuel a proven idea toward greatness or advice on any
entrepreneurial issue, E-CELL is the organization which helps you make it happen at every stage. The
corporate panel of E-CELL consists of experts from every possible domain who have excelled in
their respective fields and have agreed to help out budding entrepreneurs.
d. Incubator Panel
The Entrepreneurship Cell maintains a strong panel of Incubators from across the country. The
panel aims to provide incubation facilities to B-plans from E-business, Information Technology
Domain, ICT, IT enabled service, IT Products, Production Engineering, Bio Engineering, Bio
Diversity, Paramedical, Power Generation, Automobile Engineering and other areas.
e. Faculty Advisory Panel (External and Internal)
The faculty panel of E-Cell will consists of faculty members from various institutes across India as
well as ASIST who have excelled in their respective fields and have agreed to help out budding
entrepreneurs.
f. Faculty Coordinator :
There will be faculty coordinator whose role will be to see day to day affair of E-cell and organize the
different events and competition. He will be responsible to promote E-Cell and will work
according the advice from Director and Advisory group of the cell. He will responsible to work
according to vision and mission of the cell. He will be responsible to prepare the document related
with E-Cell.
g. Student Team:
There is a student Coordinator, and Secretary cum treasurer from the student community, who will
work under the guidance of committee member. They will responsible monitoring E-cell activities and
initiatives. They remain in touch various students of E-cell and other Entrepreneurship network
establish in different institute.

h. Student Event management Team:

a. We have to identify core team group who will manage the day to day activities as well as
different event plan in a year. The ideal size will be 25 where there will be 2 boys and 2 girl
student from each branch.
9.7. Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities (10)
(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities)(Quantify activities such
as NCC, NSS etc.)
For the overall development of the students, the institution is having RACE(Research Association for
Cyber Elitists) Association. It contains different committees like, cultural. Sports, language, alumni,
entrepreneurship, IT etc. under these committees various activities are arranged frequently. A
student’s newsletter and magazine SRUJANA is published to exhibit their talent for every quarterly
Extra-Curriculum Activities
S.NO EVENTS
1 RANGOLI
2 POETRY
3 WRITING
MEHENDI
4 ESSAY
5 WRITING
DEBATE
6 QUIZ
7 JAM
8 PAINTING
9 SKETCHING
10 COLLAGE
Co-curricular Activities
Engineers Day
Teachers Day
Quiz Competition
Tech Fest (ASIST- AAHWAAN)
Annual Magazine
Seminars,
Workshop,
Conference & Guest Lecture (at least once in a session in each department)
Institute is registered for NSS
NSS, & University Youth Festival for sports and cultural activities. Yearly excursion cum Industrial
tours is conducted for students wherein students are taken to various places of interest all over India.
This year it is planned to take a group to overseas destination as well. Tour In charges of various
departments coordinate entire activity.
Games and Sports facilities, and qualified sports instructors(5)
Outdoor –
1. Kabbadi
2. Volley Ball
3. Hand ball
4. Badminton
5. Cricket
6. Football
7. Kho-Kho
Indoor –
1. Chess
2. Carom
3. Table Tennis
4. Gymnasium
Extra-curricular activities are:
Activity Detail of activities

Extempore, Mehndi Competitions, Best Out Of Waste , Poster
Competition, Flower Arrangement, Salad Decoration , Classical Vocal
Annual Day
, Painting , Classical /Western / Folk / Fusion Dances, Clay Modeling
etc
Blood Donation Camps, Rallies on social issues, Swain Flu awareness
Social activities
Camps and Tree plantation
Other Independence Day, Republic Day, Ganesh Nimarjanam
Inter College Competitions Songs, Debate, Extempore, Just a minute session, Essay writing
(Engineering and non- competition, Tech Paper presentation.
engineering )
Foundation Day Speech, Classical /western songs and Dances

10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES (120)
10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency (40)
10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5)

(Vision statement typically indicates aspirations and Mission statement states the broad approach to
achieve aspirations)
Vision:
"Striving for a symbiosis of Technological excellence and human values."
Mission:
"To arm young brains with competitive technology and nurture holistic development of the
individuals for a better tomorrow"
10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service rules,
procedures, recruitment and promotional policies (10)
List the governing, senate, and all other academic and administrative bodies; their memberships,
functions, and responsibilities; frequency of the meetings; and attendance there in, in a tabular form. A
few sample minutes of the meetings and action-taken reports should be annexed. The published rules
including service rules, policies and procedures; year of publication shall be listed. Also state the
extent of awareness among the employees/students.
S.No. Name Capacity
Sri Kudaravalli Ramesh Babu
1 Chairman, Industrialist
MSc
Sri Kudaravalli Ramamohana Rao
2 Member, Academician
MSc
Sri Yanamadala Venkataramaiah
M.A,M.Ed,M.Phil
Sri Kudaravalli Srinivasarao
4 Member, Industrialist
BTech
Sri Koratala Eswar Chand
M.Sc
6 AICTE AICTE Ex-officio member
Dr. V. Ravindra
B. Tech., M. Tech., Ph.D
Sri N Seshgiri Rao Member, Ex Principal Govt.Poly
8
B. Tech., M. Tech. .Tech college
Dr. P Chiranjeevi
9 Member, Assoc prof
MCA., M. Tech., Ph.D.
Dr. D. Haritha
10 Member, Prof
B. Tech., M. Tech., Ph.D.
Dr. M. Sasidhar
11 Member Secretary
B. Tech., M. Tech., Ph.D.

Organization chart :
Academic Advisory Board

S.No. Name Particular
1 Dr. R Siva Ram Prasad Professor, Acharya Nagarjuna University
2 Dr. M S R Prasad Professor, K. L. University
3 Dr. M Babu Reddy Professor, Krishna University
College Academic Committee:

The academic activity of the institute is supervised by the College Academic Committee for
which, Principal is the Chairman and all heads of the departments and professors are members.
The Committee meets once in a fortnight to discuss the academic performance and to take
decisions on critical academic matters, The Minutes of this meeting is forwarded to the
Management. The salient points of the Academic Committee are made as agenda for Governing
Body.

Sr. No. Name Position Designation

1 Dr. M. Sasidhar Chairman Principal
2 Dr. P Chiuranjeevi Member Head, CSE
4 Mr. S. M Rehman Member Head, EEE
5 Mr. J S Suresh Member Head, ME
7 Dr. A Sai Suneel Member Head, ECE
8 Mr. Sk. Musa Member Head, MBA
9 Karimulla
Mr. M Rajesh Reddy Member Head, MCA
10 Mr. Ch. Yuvaraj Member Head, Civil
11 Mr.D Pavan Kumar Member Head, Humanities
The college has several committees instituted by the Director who also nominates the Coordinators of
the various committees with their duties and responsibilities. The committees are examination Cell,
Anti Ragging, Student Affairs, Disciplinary, Library, Website, Timetable, Sports & Cultural, Training
& Placement, College Newsletter, Women Welfare Committee and Girl Students’ Welfare Committee.
Examination Cell
Dr. M. Sasidhar Chief superintendent
Mr. S M Rehman Additional Supt. Exams
Mr. M Nataraj Assistant Supt. Exams
Mr. T Kiran Kumar Member Exams
Mr. B. Gangadhar Rao Member Exams
Student Affairs
Mr. V Vinay In charge Student Development
Kumar
Mr. M. Office In-charge
Sivanjaneyulu
Mr. M. Hostel & Mess coordinator
Vijaykumar
Anti Ragging Committee
Mr. M. Sivanjaneyulu Coordinator in charge

Mr. Sd Yasin Member
Mr. Ch Srinivasa Rao Member
Mr. N Venkateswara
Member
Rao
Anti Ragging Committee- Girls Hostel
Ms. A DurgaBhavani Coordinator in charge

Mrs K Archana Member
Apart from above there are committee’s for Vigilance, Anti-Ragging Committee for Bus routes.

Disciplinary Committee
Mr. M Sivanjayaneyulu Coordinator In charge
Mr. Ch Srinivasa Rao Member
Mr. N. Venkateswarao Member
Ms. K Archana Member
Mr. P. Ankamarao Campus Manager
Library Committee
Mr. R Srinivas co-coordinator In charge
Mr. G. Bharat kumar Member
Mr. K. Apparao Librarian
Mr. Giribabu P Member
Sd. Yasin Member
Time Table Committee

Mr. V. Vinaykumar coordinator in charge
Mrs. P. Durgabhavani Member
Mr. M Rajesh Reddy Member
Mr. Siva Rama Krishna Member
Institute has department level Time Table sub-committees who contribute to Institute timetable.
Sports &Cultural Committee

Mr. M. Vijay kumar Coordinator in
Mr. B. Gangadharao charge
Member CSE
Mr. P. Srinivasarao Sports coordinator
College Newsletter &Website Committee

Mr. P. Anil Kumar Coordinator in charge
Mr. K. Swami Member
Mr. J. Prabhudas Website Administrator
Female Staff & Girls students welfare Committee

Mrs. K Archana Coordinator in charge
Mrs. Ch. Srivani Member
Ms. K. Mrudhula Member
Similarly department level committees – constituted by the respective Heads – monitor the activities
of the departments like subject allocation, lab in-charges, time table, discipline, internal assessment,

academic performance, and monitoring the teaching-learning process.
TLP Monitoring Committee
Mr. Nataraj M Chem.
Mr. Rama Krishna Civil
Mr. M Sivanjaneyulu CSE
Mr. Ch. Chinnaveraiah EEE
Mr. P. Sureshbabu ME
Mr. D Balaji Physics
Defined rules, procedures, recruitment, and promotional policies, etc
The college appreciates the importance of Human Resource to further propel the healthy growth rate
of the institute and hence constituted an exclusive HR Department that takes care of all spheres of
HR needs of the institute. Apart from fulfilling the man power requirement of the institute/group,
HR department ensures proper dissemination of policies amongst staff all cadres by ways of
orientation sessions for newly recruited staff along with maintenance of all records pertaining to
staff. HR department is also entrusted the responsibility of counseling the staff from time to time to
ensure that a healthy environment prevails in the institute and all staff work towards the desired
goals and objectives. Apart from having a published HR manual within the department, that details
the procedures relating to recruitment, promotion, career progression, increments etc, there are
detailed policies for:
 Policy for Leaves available to staff of different cadre
 Policy for Leave travel concession (LTC)
 Policy for Medi claim for self, spouse and 2 kids of Rs. 100000/-
 Policy for Attendance registration and Leave Application processing in Biometric Attendance
Recording. Policy for Early Leaving/Late Coming/Movement Outside Campus:
 Promotional Policy for Ph.D. Program
 Promotional Policy for Higher studies (M.Tech.) Promotion policy in time scale.
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism(10)
List the names of the faculty members who have been delegated powers for taking administrative
decisions. Mention details in respect of decentralization in working. Specify the mechanism and
composition of grievance redressal cell including Anti Ragging Committee & Sexual Harassment
Committee. List the names of the faculty members who have been delegated powers for taking
administrative decisions. Mention details in respect of decentralization in working. Specify the
mechanism and composition of grievance redressal cell including
Anti Ragging Committee & Sexual Harassment Committee.
The management has delegated its authority to the Principal to administer the institute on sound
principles. The principal in-turn has delegated the powers to Vice-Principal, the principal and HODs

of various academic departments. Principal looks after student performance and development. He
look after academic activities of the Institute as per the university requirements. Principal looks after
the co-curricular and extracurricular activities of the student community and ensures their
participation in maximum number of events to enhance their overall personality. Principal
concentrates upon research & development activities and initiatives and looks after the
developments taking place in various departments. Principal ensures that the examination systems
are foolproof and exams are conducted with full integrity. The principal are assisted by the Heads of
Dept. in all the matters of interest. The principal holds review meetings on monthly basis and
decisions are collectively taken on the issues pertaining to improvement and functioning of the
Institute. In-turn the Heads of the Departments conduct monthly faculty meetings within respective
departments and obtain the details pertaining to academic and non-academic and any student related
problems. Also all the teachers are student counselors and they are in constant touch with the
students through weekly meetings. The information collected by them is passed on to HODs who in
turn appraise the HODs and the principal. Thus the administration is transparent and trust-worthy
and facilitates smooth conduct and function of the Institute. All purchases are handled by a
Purchase committee who receive requisitions from various departments and the committee evaluates
the need, timeframe of supply, budgetary provisions and accordingly processes the purchases
requirements. The Committee is headed by Director and has senior faculties and administrators as
members. The principal in term a breasts the management about the purchases to be made and all
such proposals are finally put up in Governing Body meetings for Approval.
Financial power of the principal: 15 Lac for a single procurement

Financial power of the Vice-principal:10 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the HOD: 5 Lac for a single procurement. List of Faculty members who are
Administrators/Decision Makers
PG & Ph.D. Programme
Mr. M. Vijay Kumar M.Tech Programs

Academics
Dr. P Chiranjeevi Academics
Student Section
Mr. M. Sivanjaneyulu Student Development
R&D
Mr. Sd Yasin in charge R&D

Data Collection & Newsletter
Mr. K. Swami Data Collection & Newsletter
Mr. P. Anilkumar Data Collection & Newsletter
Mr. B Dharma Raju Data Collection & Newsletter
A Grievance redressal committee has been constituted headed by Vice - Principal and its existence is
widely circulated. If any major grievance is there, that could not be solved at HOD level, can be
submitted to the Committee. The committee has HOD Humanities as Female member to look in to
the matters that could come in preview of sexual harassment. The committee will go into details and
gives its suggestions to the principal. Principal, in consultation with Management takes appropriate
steps for redressal. In charge - Student Development continuously interacts with student’s in various
platforms to identify student grievances and is brought to the notice of the committee for appropriate
action
10.1.4.Delegation of financial powers (10)

Institution should explicitly mention financial powers delegated to the Principal, Heads of
Departments and relevant in-charges. Demonstrate the utilization of financial powers for each year of
the assessment years. Institution should explicitly mention financial powers delegated to the Principal,
Heads of Departments and relevant in-charges. Demonstrate the utilization of financial powers for
each year of the assessment years. All purchases are handled by a Purchase committee who receive
requisitions from various departments and the committee evaluates the need, timeframe of supply,
budgetary provisions and accordingly processes the purchases requirements. The Committee is headed
by principal and has senior faculties and administrators as members. The principal in term a breasts
the management about the purchases to be made and all such proposals are finally put up in Governing
Body meetings for Approval.
Financial power of the principal: 15 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the Vice-principal: 10 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the HOD: 5 Lac for a single procurement
10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous in formation in public domain (5)

The college website and the Local College management software ensures that all information’s
pertaining to students, staff in the CMS to ensure that all stake holders are adequately informed about
the policies and procedures along with the developments taking place that could affect them.
All the information pertaining to the admissions, faculty and supporting staff details, student
attendance, internal marks, infrastructural facilities, details of programs, information related to
ongoing student training programs, faculty development programs, symposiums etc., are made
available in the college internet based CMS. All Minutes of Meetings like College Academic Council
(CAC), Department Review Meetings (DRM) and other information are displayed in the Bulletin
Board of CMS. The relevant details are available in the departmental files which are readily accessible
to all faculties in the departmental file racks.
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (30)
Summary of current financial year’s budget and actual expenditure incurred in Lakhs (for the
institution exclusively) in the three previous financial years.
Table 1 - CFY 2016-2017
Total Income Actual Expenditure Total No. of
1194 1068 Students
2180
Others
Recurring Special
(Interest, Non- Expenditure per
Fee Govt. Grants including Projects (Land,
Bus fees, Recurring student
Salaries Building, WIP
Misc. fees)
238 544 0 412 836 232 --- 0.54
Table 2 – CFYm1 2015-2016

1113 1112 Students
1961
Others
Recurring Special
Misc. fees)
211 519 0 383 834 278 --- 0.56
Table 3 – CFYm2 2014-2015

878 769.64 Students
1834
Others
Recurring Special
Misc. fees)
228 465 0 185 577.15 192.49 --- 0.41
Table 4 – CFYm3 2013-2014

808 647 Students
1758
Others
Recurring Special
Misc. fees)
211 443 0 154 468.5 178.5 --- 0.36
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY,CFYm1,CFYm2 &CFYm3
CFY: Current Financial Year, CFYm1 (Current Financial Year minus 1),CFYm2 (Current
Financial Year minus 2)and CFYm3 (Current Financial Year minus 3)
Actual Actual Actual Actual

Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted
Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses
Items in 2016- in 2015- in 2014- in 2013-
in 2016- in 2015- in 2014- in 2013-
2017 2016 2015 2014
2017 till 2016 till 2015 till 2014 till
Laboratory
11 10.92 28 27.75 20 15.96 30 28
equipment
Salaries 562 560.08 575 570.02 400 388.87 300 296
Library 1.70 1.66 1.23 1.21 1.47 1.45 3.34 3.19
Transport 120 118 125 125 115 114.85 125 120
Maintenance 100 90.99 70 67.02 50 47 60 58
R&D 3 2.77 3 2.26 5 3.25 5 4.24
Training and
23 21.04 20 16.23 10 9.48 5 3.15
Travel
Project
0 0.0 3 2.35 5 4.25 5 3.25
Expo
General
280 264.20 370 368.39 200 186.48 150 134.36
Expenses
Total 1100.7 1069.66 1195.23 1113.21 806.47 771.09 683.34 650.19
10.2.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)

(The institution needs to justify that the budget allocated during assessment years was adequate)
Since the department is in growing phase, college management has made it a point that funds should
not be a hindrance factor for the healthy rate of growth. Adequate budget is allocated and expenditure
is monitored. In no circumstances, teaching learning process is made to suffer because of fund
shortage.
Assessment Budget Allocated Actual Expenditure Adequate / Non

S.No.
Year in Lakhs (Rs.) in Lakhs (Rs.) Adequate
1 2016-2017 1100.7 1069.66 Adequate
2 2015-2016 1195.23 1113.21 Adequate
3 2014-2015 806.47 771.09 Adequate
4 2013-2014 683.34 650.19 Adequate
10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15)

(The institution needs to state how the budget was utilized during assessment years)
During last three years budget allocation and utilization is in order and no deficiency was observed
Assessment Budget Allocated Actual Expenditure Percentage of

S.No.
Year in Lakhs (Rs.) in Lakhs (Rs.) Utilization
1 2016-2017 1100.7 1069.66 97.17
2 2015-2016 1195.23 1113.21 93.13
3 2014-2015 806.47 771.09 95.61
4 2013-2014 683.34 650.19 95.14

10.2.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website (5)
(The institution needs to make audited statements available on its website)
Institutional audit statements are available on the institute’s website
10.3. Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization (30)

Total Budget at program level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 &CFYm3
CFY: Current Financial Year, CFYm1 (CurrentFinancialYearminus1), CFYm2(Current
Financial Year minus 2) and CFYm3 (Current Financial Year minus 3).
Table 1 :: CFY 2016-2017
Total Budget Adequate Expenditure Total Number of

15134363 14386327.32 students
456
Non- Expenditure per
Recurring Non-recurring Recurring
recurring Student
1305529 13828834 1216103.82 13170223.5 31548
Table 2 :: CFYm1 2015-2016

21755069 20712991.2 students
397
recurring Student
3619943 18135126 3341486.8 17371504.4 52173
Table 3 :: CFYm2 2014-2015

13089214 12278521.2 students
390
recurring Student
947286 12141928 874418.6 11404102.6 31483
Table 4 :: CFYm3 2013-2014

6282761 5986472.4 students
380
recurring Student
492632 5790129 454738 5531734.6 15753

Actual Actual Actual Actual

Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted
Expenses in Expenses Expenses Expenses
Items in 2016- in 2015- in 2014- in 2013-
2016-2017 in 2015- in 2014- in 2013-
2017 2016 2015 2014
till 2016 till 2015 till 2014 till
Laboratory
1305529 1216103.82 3619943 3341486.8 947286 874418.6 492632 454738
equipment
Software 36347 29078 10181 8145 0 0 0 0
Laboratory
32178 28603 102016 91570 131152 128453 163968 145750
consumable
Maintenance
603040 556652.7 553366 510800.2 499550 461123.2 230067 212370
and spares
R&D 250000 166955.6 64119 59187.6 20613 19027.8 127402 117602.8
Training and
55414 51152.2 201123 185652.2 132478 126450.4 52388 48359
Travel
Salaries 9625871 9240837 10478967 10059809 7244747 6687459 4784296 4592925
Miscellaneous
3225984 3096945 6725354 6456340.4 4113388 3981589.2 432008 414727.8
expenses
Total 15134363 14386327.32 21755069 20712991.2 13089214 12278521.2 6282761 5986472.4
10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)

The yearly budget is prepared according to the needs & requirements of the departments taking into
consideration of annual intake of students, laboratory & infrastructure developments. Students,
faculty & staff requirements and promotions and latest technologies etc.,
Various departments submit the annual budget to principal. On receipt of such proposals,
principal, in consultation with departmental HODs, prepares a consolidated proposal. After
deliberations formal budget made altered in departments and forwarded to Principal for
preparing final budget at college level and submits it to the Governing Body for approval and
sanction.
The Management is approving almost 100% which was proposed by the institute. The budget
allocation and utilization for the last three years is adequate.
All the expenditure needs prior approval from the competent authority. Funds would be spent only
from the approved budget. If funds are required for expenses not mentioned in the proposal,
management’s approval is a must. Management ensures the adequacy of the funds from various
sources like, fee accrual, donation and bank loans.
Since the department is in growing phase, college management has made it a point that funds should
not be a hindrance factor for the healthy rate of growth. Adequate budget is allocated and expenditure
is monitored. In no circumstances, teaching learning process is made to suffer because of fund
shortage

Assessment Budget Allocated Actual Expenditure Adequate / Non

S.No.
Year in Lakhs (Rs.) in Lakhs (Rs.) Adequate
1 2016-2017 15134363 14386327.32 Adequate
2 2015-2016 21755069 20712991.2 Adequate
3 2014-2015 13089214 12278521.2 Adequate
4 2013-2014 6282761 5986472.4 Adequate
10.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds (20)

(Program needs to state how the budget was utilized during the last three assessment years)
During last three years budget allocation and utilization is in order and no deficiency was observed
Assessment Budget Allocated Actual Expenditure Percentage of
S.No.
Year in Lakhs (Rs.) in Lakhs (Rs.) Utilization
1 2016-2017 15134363 14386327.32 95.05
2 2015-2016 21755069 20712991.2 95.20
3 2014-2015 13089214 12278521.2 93.80
4 2013-2014 6282761 5986472.4 95.28
10.4. Library and Internet (20)

(Indicate whether zero deficiency report was received by the Institution for all the assessment years.
Effective availability/purchase records and utilization of facilities/equipment etc. to be documented
and demonstrated)
10.4.1.Quality of learning resources (hard/soft)(10)

Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources
Accessibility to students
Support to student’s for self-learning activities
 Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources

 Accessibility to students
 Support to students for self-learning activities
 Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources
Library Services Yes
Carpet area of library (in m2) 652
Reading space (in m2) 400
Number of seats in reading space 250
Number of users (issue book) per day 600
Number of users (reading space) per day 600
Timings: During working day, weekend, and vacation 8:00AM to 8:00PM &
9:00AM to 1:00PM
Number of library staff 6
Number of library staff with degree in Library 2
Management Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return records Bar coding used
Yes
Library services on Internet/Intranet INDEST or other similar membership Archives
Yes
Titles and volumes per title
Number Of New Number Of New Number Of New

Year
Titles Added Editions Added Volumes Added
2014-2015 56 48 484
2015-2016 59 44 975
2016-2017 45 33 436
2017-2018 36 27 325
Scholarly journal subscription
No.of Technical No.of Total Technical Scholarly Journal

Year Magazines/Periodica Journals subscribed Titles(in originals,
ls reprints)
In In
Hardcopy Softcopy
2014-2015 4 6 15
2015-2016 4 6 20
2016-2017 4 6 25
2017-2018 4 6 10
Support to students for self-learning activities
10.4.2.Internet(10)
Name of the Internet provider bsnl, My guru online
Available band width 54 mbps
Wi-Fi availability 5 mbps

Internet access in labs, classrooms,
Yes
library and offices of all Departments
Security arrangements Yes

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT
Declaration
(The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the format given)
I undertake that, the institution is well aware about the provisions in the NBA’s accreditation manual
concerned for this application, rules, regulations, notifications and NBA expert visit guidelines in
force as on date and the institute shall fully abide by them.
It is submitted that information provided in this Self Assessment Report is factually correct. I
understand and agree that an appropriate disciplinary action against the Institute will be initiated by
the NBA, in case any false statement/information is observed during pre-visit, visit, post visit and
subsequent to grant of accreditation.
Date : 30-12-2017 Signature & Name
Place : Vijayawada Head of the Institution with seal
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala

Cse-Sar 2018

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Cse-Sar 2018

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Amrita Sai Institute of Science & Technology

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION

Department of Computer Science & Engineering

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

PARTA: Institutional Information

1. Name and Address of the Institution:

2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:

3. Year of establishment of the Institution:

4. Type of the Institution:

Any Other (Please specify)

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 1

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:

Name of the Institution(s) Year of

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Year Increase Year of AICTE Accreditation

-- Yes - Eligible but not

M Tech(VLSI & Embedded -- Yes - Eligible but not

Diploma (Electrical and -- Yes - Not eligible for

Diploma(Mechanical -- Yes - Not eligible for

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 2

S No Level Discipline Program

2 Under Graduate Engineering &Technology B. Tech - Electronics & Communication Engg.

9. Total number of employees in the institution:

A. Regular Employees (Faculty and Staff):

2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

10. Total number of Engineering Students:

Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Engineering and Technology- PG Shift-1

Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Engineering and Technology- Polytechnic Shift-2

Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Engineering and Technology- MBA Shift-1

Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Total no. of boys 65 51 42

Engineering and Technology- MCA Shift-1

Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016

Total no. of boys 29 25 30

11. Vision of the Institution:

12. Mission of the Institution:

ii. NBA coordinator, if designated:

Name : Dr. P Chiranjeevi

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 5

PART B: Criteria Summary

Name of the program: Computer Science & Engineering

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 6

1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60)

1.2. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5)

 Institutes Website: www.amritasai.edu.in

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 7

 Hostel notice board

List of stake holder

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 8

Figure-1.4.1: Process of establishing Vision & Mission of Department

Figure-1.4.2: Process of establishing PEOs of Department

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 9

Figure-1.4.3: Process of finalizing PEOs of Department

List the Stakeholders of the Programme

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 10

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)

1.5.1. Justify the academic factors involved in achievement of the PEOs

Curriculum and Syllabi:

AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page 11