Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RWINH-33044/1212019-S&R(P&B)
Government of India
Ministry of RoadTransport &Highways
(S&R(P&B)Section)
Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110001
Dated:l~~arch, 2019
Office Memorandum
Yours Faithfully
End: As above.
~hadablmam)
Assistant Executive Engineer, S&R (P&B)RS
For Director General (Road Development) & SS
To,
1. Director General (RD) ass
2. All ADGs/CEsof Project Zones in MoRTH
3. All CE-RO/SE-RO,MoRTH.
4. All SEsfor the Project Zones in MoRTH
Office Order
I have received a number of proposals during the last one week for sanction of works
under CRF/ ISEC/ IRQP in respect of certain states as well as for Periodic Renewal/
Strengthening of part stretches of the National Highways/ One-time Improvement works,
(i) Since the works under the CRF have been sanctioned with a high level of Bank of
Sanctions (BoS) in mast of the cases) every sanction/ administrative approval must
include the following as one of the stipulations:
"Approval to the State's proposal is accorded subject to the condition that the
responsibility of the 'Central Governmentshall be restricted to the accrual of CRF
for the state and the State Government shall ensure to managefunds/resources
to take up the works beyond their share of CRF accruals from their own
resources",
(ii) Any sanctions issued in the past without the above stipulation must be followed by
an addendum/ amendment in the Administrative Approval already issued.
(i) It has been observed that proposals for one-time improvement of certain stretches,
which were bypassed a few years ago and which are deemed to have been de-
notified as NH on account of having been bypassed, are being entertained. This is
inconsistent with the intentions behind the Government instructions on the subject.
(ii) As such, it may be ensured that only such of the proposals are entertained and
processed for one-time improvement where the bypass to such stretch was opened
to traffic not longer than six months before the consideration of any such proposal.
Once the Bypasshas been opened to traffic for a period of six months or more, no
proposal for 'One-time Improvement' shall be considered/ processed.
Page 1 of 3
"
No. Secy/ RTH/ Circularl 005
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
Transport Bhavan,1, Parliament Street, New Delhi -110001
2.4 Breaking-up proposals below Rs. 5.00 cr. to avoid EPCmode of execution:
It has been observed in a few cases that separate proposal for less than 5.00 crore
have been processed in the same stretch of the NH, primarily with a view to
undertake such works on Item-Rate basis as the Road works of the value of Rs. 5.00
crore and above have to be taken up in EPCmode as per the extant guidelines. Any
such practice would be viewed seriously and the CE/ ADG concerned shall be
personally responsible for processing any such case.
(i) It has been noted that in spite of specific instructions from the DG (RD) &5S,
calculation of GST and other Centages is not being done as per instructions. The
Standard method of calculations, as under, shall be meticulously followed in each
case processed and submitted for approval:
Page 2 of 3
No. Secy/ RTH/ Circular/ 005
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
Transport Bhavan,1, Parliament Street, New Delhi -110001
(ii) As for the provisions for GST, it is a part of the sanctioned Cost-estimates of the
project. Now, this is being added in the cost-estimates straightway @12%,whereas
the fact is that the 50Rs of certain states are inclusive of the component of VAT/
GST. This status must be ensured before making a straight provision of 12%GST in
the estimates;
While GST, Contingencies, and Centages are part of the approved cost-estimates for
any project! proposal, it is only the estimated Civil Construction Cost, which shall
be put to Tender while inviting the bids. This may be made a part of the Technical
~·
Note/ Administrative Approval.
I (Y. S. MaliK)
Secretary
Page 3 of 3