School Profile

1. Enrolment
Enrolment by Gender
700

600

500
301
Number of Pupils

285
283
400

300

200
314 295 280
100

0
2013 - 2014 2014-2015 2015 - 2016
School Year

Male Female

Interpretation:
In the course of three (3) years, the enrolment gradually
decreases due to the age cut off in Kindergarten enrollees. It is
clearly seen in the graph that the number of male and female
enrollees have minimal differences.

1|Page
 2. Health and Nutritional Status
Nutritional Status SY 2015 - 2016
Endline March
180
160
140 7
7
12 15
120 132
128 8 8
100 11 15
103 99
80
60
40
20
0
0
Male 0
Female 1
Male 0
Female
Kinder to Grade 3 Grade 4 to Grade 6

Overweight Normal Wasted Severely Wasted

Interpretation:
Almost 14% (41 out of 301) of the
primary pupils fall outside the
normal nutritional status. On the
other hand, 18% (43 out of 245) of
the intermediate pupils fall outside
the normal nutritional status.
These pupils are subjected to
feeding program.

2|Page
3. Learners Materials
Subject Excess Shortage
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 1 86
English 1 86
Filipino 1 86
Mathematics 1 11
Textbook
Araling Panlipunan 1 9
(Grade 1)
Musika at Sining 1 7
Eduk. Pangkatawan at 65
Pangkalusugan 1
Mother Tongue 1 86

Subject Excess Shortage

Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 2 37
English 2 37
Filipino 2 37
Textbook
Mathematics 2 37
(Grade 2)
Araling Panlipunan 2 37
MAPEH 2 37
Mother Tongue 2 37

Subject Excess Shortage

Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 3 27
English 3 1
Filipino 3 27
Textbook Mathematics 3 27
(Grade 3) Science 1
Araling Panlipunan 3 1
MAPEH 3 27
Mother Tongue 3 27

3|Page
 Subject Excess Shortage
Textbook English 4 0 2
(Grade 4) Filipino 4 0 2
Mathematics 4 0 2
Science 4 0 2
Musika at Sining 4 5 0
Eduk. Pangkatawan at 5 0
Pangkalusugan 4

Subject Excess Shortage

Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 5 83
English 5 83
Filipino 5 83
Mathematics 83
Science 5 83
Textbook
Araling Panlipunan 5 83
(Grade 5)
Musika at Sining 5 83
Eduk. Pangkatawan at 83
Pangkalusugan 5
Edukasyong Pantahanan at 83
Pangkabuhayan 5

4|Page
 Number
Tables 7
Computer Room
Chairs 20

Computer 7
Printer 3
Computer Projector 1
Whitescreen 1
Activboard 1

Beaker 3
Test tube 12
Science Thermometer 2
Equipments Alcohol lamp 2
Test tube holder 1
Graduated cylinder 2

5|Page
4. Teacher’ Professional development

Trainings attended by teachers SY

2015-2016
16

2
1 1 1

K to 12 Research GAD SBM InSet

Interpretation:
In the last year, all teachers attended the in-
service training. Only two (2) attended about K-
12.

6|Page
5. Funding Source

Sources of School Funding, S.Y. 2015-2016

100,000.00

10,000.00
35,000.00 267,900.00

MOOE LGUs Canteen Donation

The biggest source of school funding comes from the

MOOE. Other sources are canteen fund, LGUs, and
donors.

7|Page
6. School awards and recognitions

Title of Award Award Giving Level Category of

Body (International, Awardee
National, Region, (Student, Teacher,
Division, or School School Head,
Level) School)
81st National Book Mansalay District District Student
Week Celebration
Math Quiz Bee Mansalay District District Student
Champion – Track Division of Division Student
and Field Oriental Mindoro
Trefoil Award (GSP) Girl Scouts of the National Teacher
Philippines
Best in Mansalay District District Teacher
Photojounalism

8|Page
Performance Indicators: Access
7. Number and rate of dropouts by cause

Number of Dropout by Cause

9
Interpretation:
8 The number of dropouts
7 2 decreases significantly
6 over the past 3 years. The
Number of Cases

5 main cause of dropouts for

4 4 the 2 previous years is
3
3 child labor. But in the
1
2
present year, the main
1 2 2 2
cause changes to family
problem.
0
2013 - 2014 2014 - 2015 2015 - 2016
School year

Family Problem Child Labor Distance to School

Dropout Rate

1.40%

1%

0.50%

SY 2013 - 2014 SY 2014 - 2015 SY 2015 - 2016

9|Page
Performance Indicators: Quality
8. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year
(Promotion rate)
Promotion Rate SY 2015 - 2016
100%
96%
95% 93%

90%

85%

80%

75%

70%

65%

60%

55%

50%
K Grade 1

Interpretation:
Only 96 % of kinder pupils
continue to grade 1. On
the other hand, 93% of
Grade 1 pupils are
promoted to the next
level. This can be
attributed to the number
of transferred outs and
dropouts.

10 | P a g e
Performance Indicators: Quality
9. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by Mean Percentage
Score (MPS)

NAT result by subject, S.Y. 2014 - 2015

90.79
89.55

82.02
80.82

77.05

English Filipino Mathematics Science HEKASI

Interpretation:
In the recent NAT result,
pupils performed well in
English and Science,
respectively. However,
interventions may be
needed to assists pupils
the area of Filipino,
Mathematics and HEKASI.

11 | P a g e
10. Literacy Rate

Interpretation:
PHIL-IRI result shows a great
improvement on the literacy level
of pupils. After post test, many
pupils moved from frustration
level to instructional level in both
English and Filipino.

Number of Learners by Literacy Level SY 2015 -

2016
100%
12 87 82 210
90% 100

80%
189 172
70%
267
60%

50% 201

40%
188
30% 149

20%

10% 61
0%
Pretest Post test Pretest Post test
English Filipino

Frustration Instructional Independent

12 | P a g e
11. School – Based Management Assessment Level

SBM Level: Descriptive

Interpretation:

I Developing

12. Child-Friendly School Survey Result

CFSS Points: Descriptive

Interpretation:

28 Child
Friendly
School

The school got 28 points in the Child Friendly School

Survey making us a Child Friendly School.

13 | P a g e
13. Stakeholders’ participation

Stakeholders have shown

notable participation to
meetings and assemblies held
in school. However, their
presence is few during co-
curricular and extra-curricular
activities.

takeholders' Attendance to School

Activities SY 2015-2016
83% 83%

25%

10%

Co-curricular Extra-curricular Meetings Assemblies

14 | P a g e
14. Learner-Teacher Ratio

Learner-Teacher Ratio SY 2015-2016

90
80
70
Standard
60
50
40 84

30
20 43 39 42
34 37
31
10
0
K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Based from the graphic

presentation, only kindergarten and
grade 1 pupils have a general class
size bigger than the recommended
pupil-teacher ratio.

15 | P a g e
15. Learner-Classroom Ratio

Only kindergarten
and grade 1 has a
general class size
bigger than the
recommended pupil-
classroom ratio.

Learner-Classroom Ratio SY 2015-2016

90
80
70
60
Standard
50
40 84

30
20 43 39 42
34 37
31
10
0
K Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

16 | P a g e
16. Learner-Toilet Ratio

Learner-Toilet
Ratio SY 2015-2016
standard
55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20 40

15

10

0
1

There are enough toilets to accommodate all pupils

while maintaining an acceptable cleanliness level of
the comfort rooms.

17 | P a g e
17. Learner-Seat Ratio

The graph shows that

the ratio of pupil-seat
Learner-Seat Ratio SY 2015-
is bigger than the 2016
1.6
standard ratio.
1.4
Therefore, more seats 1.4
1.2
are needed in the
1
school.
0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
1
standard

18 | P a g e
18. Status of Continuous Improvement (CI) projects
Construction of concrete
fence is still on-going to
complete the surrounding
of the school.

Makeshift building is
successfully built to cater
Grade 4 pupils.

19 | P a g e
The canteen building will
be continuously improved.
Tables and cabinets will be
added.

Stage was built already.

Roofing will be added next
year.
20 | P a g e
19. Other stakeholders’ accomplishments

Concrete fence is ready

for the installation of
grills.

21 | P a g e
Certified Accurate:

BUENA D. NAPA LORENA A. TORDESILLAS

School Head Teacher Representative

MARIO G. MADURAL MARY JANE C. HERRERA

PTA President SPG President

22 | P a g e