Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Structuralists defended (and still defend) that every word can be divided into Morphemes
and Morphs, and we must remember that a Morpheme is: - Single, Indivisible and Recurrent
(In their Idiosyncrasy) while the Word-based people only defended (And still defend) the
relation between Form and Meaning.
For example, with words like Sheep, which plural is an irregular form: SHEEP + PLURAL. The
Structuralists can't contemplate that: "¿How is it possible that a plural is in the MORPHEMES
while in the morphs nothing appear?"
Everything because it is an irregular plural with the Zero Derivation, so, the Structuralists have a
problem with that word, while the Word-Based People only say: "There is a dynamic interaction
between the meaning component "SHEEP" and "PLURAL" at the level of the word gives rise to the
word "Sheep"
Another example is the word Gooseberry, along with the berry-words (Except Blueberry and
Blackberry) Gooseberry can't be divided because "Goose" is not single, indivisible and recurrent.
It is UNIQUE MORPHEME+MORPHEME and belongs to Group 3 words, like Dismay.
(Of course you can find "May" and "Goose" alone, and "Dis" will be a Negative Morpheme, but in
that combination of words giving the exact word as Dismay or Gooseberry is not analyzable by
the Structuralists)
Explicación Básica Previa: Un poco de teoría nunca sobra
-Ablaut vs Umlaut:
The Umlaut is something called "The U mutation" and it can be seen in cases like:
Cactus Cacti
Alumnus Alumni
Mouse Mice
Pregunta Nº1: DEFINE BRIEFLY AND EXEMPLIFY THW FOLLOWING
CONCEPTS
-Morpheme vs Phonoastheme
A Morpheme is the small, meaningful and recurrent unit while the phonoastheme is a
recurrent part of words which occur in very limited sets and yet do not seem to have
any specifiable meaning nor any meaning at all beyond the limited set.
An example of the Morpheme could be a regular analysis in Morphemes of any word
and with the phonoastemes we should pick the example (/n/ in not, neither, no,
never)
A Single Morph is a Morph that can stand alone as a word and a Bound Morph is a
Morph that can't stand alone as a word.
Examples: Pointed. Point is the Free Morph, -ed is the Bound Morph.
Repainted. Repaint is the Free Morph, -ed is the Bound Morph. (It is divided in
Repaint and -ed because the verb "Repaint" means "To paint again" while "Paint" is "To
paint" and won't have the same meaning)
Pregunta Nº1: DEFINE BRIEFLY AND EXEMPLIFY THW FOLLOWING
CONCEPTS
-Roots vs Stems
Stems are the forms to which inflections may be added, but which may already have
derivational suffixes. The root is the word to which derivations may be added. For
example: Repainted
Root: Paint
In "Repainted" we have the Stem "Repaint" with the Inflectional suffix "-ed"
We must remember that the inflections maintain the category of the word "Noun to
noun, Verb to Verb" while the derivations change the category "Noun to Verb, Noun to
Adjective"
THE NEXT THING IS NOT OBLIGATORY, BUT JUST A FRIENDLY REMINDER OF
MORPHS AND MORPHEMES ANALYSIS. (From Myself)
MORPHS "re-" + "paint" + "-ed"
MORPHEMES AGAIN + PAINT + PAST
Pregunta Nº1: DEFINE BRIEFLY AND EXEMPLIFY THW FOLLOWING
CONCEPTS
-Unique Morpheme vs Pseudomorpheme
Allomorphs are different morphs that represent the same morpheme, like the past -
ed: /t/ /Id/ or /d/
Lexical morphs are morphs that can be used in the creation of new words, for example
"Headline" while Grammatical Morphs represent grammatical categories, for example:
"-Ed" or "-ist“
The trysillabic laxing is where the phenomenon whereby tense vowels (e.g
diphthongs) or long vowels become lax (short monopthongs) when followed by two
syllabes (in a derived environment), the first of which is unstressed. [Example: From
Impede to Impediment, from Grateful to Gratitude, ect...] On the other hand, the
lexical morphology concerns itself primarily with word formation: derivation and
compounding. For example it is where you combine two words in order to create a new
word. [For example: Head + Line, Headline] Or you derive a word form one to
another: Real + ity, Reality.
Pregunta Nº1: DEFINE BRIEFLY AND EXEMPLIFY THW FOLLOWING
CONCEPTS
-Trysillabic laxing vs Lexical Morphology
The trysillabic laxing is where the phenomenon whereby tense vowels (e.g
diphthongs) or long vowels become lax (short monopthongs) when followed by two
syllabes (in a derived environment), the first of which is unstressed. [Example: From
Impede to Impediment, from Grateful to Gratitude, ect...] On the other hand, the
lexical morphology concerns itself primarily with word formation: derivation and
compounding. For example it is where you combine two words in order to create a new
word. [For example: Head + Line, Headline] Or you derive a word form one to
another: Real + ity, Reality.
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: IDENTIFY THE WORD-FORMATION PROCESSES
INSTANTIATED IN THE FOLLOWING WORDS. JUSTIFY YOUR ANSWE WITH
THE INPUT, OUTPUT AND MEANING
¿Por qué van en el mismo bloque? Porque la pregunta Nº3 es solo analizar compounds,
y la pregunta Nº2 es analizar procesos de formación de palabras donde también
pueden caer compounds. Sabiendo hacer la pregunta Nº2, se saca la pregunta Nº3.
INPUT, OUTPUT
MEANING
TYPE
EXAMPLES
INPUT, OUTPUT
GLOSS
MORPHEME ANALYSIS
EXAMPLES OF RECURRING ONES
+ Affixation Example
INPUT: "help" (v) + "-ful" (Adj) (Class Changing Suffix)
OUTPUT: helpful (Adj)
GLOSS: A person who X-s
MORPHEME ANALYSIS: "HELP" (FREE MORPHEME) + "-FUL" (BOUND,
LEXICAL MORPHEME)
EXAMPLE OF RECURRING ONES: "Help": Helpless. "Ful": Grateful
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: Word-Formation Analisis
C) Compounding
INPUT, OUTPUT
TYPE: Endocentric, Exocentric, Appositional, Copulative
METONIMY/METAPHOR/ECT...
MEANING
ARGUMENT STRUCTURE
OTHER EXAMPLES
C) Compounding
C) Compounding
A trick to Identify the Head is to think that it is usually in the Right side, and put it in
plural. If both are Ok, it is the Head. A very usual word with the Head at the left is
"Mother-in-law“
+ Tips for the Argument Structure:
Noun Compounds Verb + Adverbials
Sub + Verb Swimming Pool: X Swims in the pool
Sunrise: The sun rises Babysitter: X sits with the baby
Rattlesnake: The snake rattles Homework: X works at home
Dancing-girl: The girl dances
Subject + Object
Verb + Object Windmill: The wind powers the mill
Blood-test: X tests your blood Public-House: The house is public
Tax-payer: X pays taxes Toy-Factory: The factory produces toys
Doorknob: The door has a knob
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: Word-Formation Analisis
C) Compounding
Subject + Complement (Use always copulative verbs: Be/ Seems) [Ser,
Estar o Parecer)
Darkroom: The room is dark
Adjective Compounds
Verb + Object
Maneating: X eats men
Verb + Adverbial
Ocean-going: X goes across the ocean
Verbless
Crystal-Clear: As clear as crystal
Special cases
Prep + Prep
Into: A kind of within
Onto: A kind of within
Within: A kind of within.
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: Word-Formation Analisis
D) Clipping
INPUT, OUTPUT
BASE
DERIVATIVE/RESULTING FORM
MEANING
TYPE OF W.F
E) Backformation
INPUT, OUTPUT
MEANING
TYPE OF W.F
+ Example of Backformation
INPUT: "Babysitting" (N)
OUTPUT: "To babysit" (V)
MEANING: To look after babies/children while parents are absent
TYPE: A case of word formation by means of a process of backformation,
since a shorter word has resulted from a longer and more complex word.
F) Acronym
(Maybe the phonemes will be required, put them if you need to)
TYPE AND MEANING
TYPE A: Pronounced as a sequence of letters
TYPE B: Pronounced as a word
+ Example of an Acronym
NATO: /ˈneɪtəʊ/
TYPE B: It is a TYPE B Acronym because it is pronounced as a word.
MEANING: Stands For North-Atlantic-Treaty-Organization
Los acrónimos están en las redes, en el anexo que os dió Gonzálvez, en todas partes,
buscad y estudiadlos, muchos simplemente se han dado en clase o son ejemplos que
ya deberíais saber.
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: Word-Formation Analisis
G) Coinage or Word-Manufacturing
PROCESS
TYPE OF W.F
MEANING
REASON
+ Example of a Coinage: To Xerox
PROCESS: After Xerox, the photocopying company
TYPE: A word based on a Word-Manufacturing/Coinage process since a
previously non-existent verb has been coined from a brand name.
MEANING: To produce a copy or a document by this process
REASON: This happens by virtue of metonymy
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: Word-Formation Analisis
H) Blending
INPUT, OUTPUT
MEANING
TYPE
+Example of Blending: Amphetamine
INPUT: "Alphametyl" (N) + "Phenethylamine" (N)
OUTPUT: "Amphetamine" (N)
MEANING: It is a chemical product or a drug
TYPE: A case of word formation by means of a blending process, since a
totally new word has merged from parts of two other words.
Pregunta Nº2 y 3: Word-Formation Analisis
H) Blending
INPUT, OUTPUT
MEANING
TYPE
+Example of Blending: Amphetamine
INPUT: "Alphametyl" (N) + "Phenethylamine" (N)
OUTPUT: "Amphetamine" (N)
MEANING: It is a chemical product or a drug
TYPE: A case of word formation by means of a blending process, since a
totally new word has merged from parts of two other words.
Pregunta Nº4:POSSIBLE EXERCISE ABOUT LEXICAL PHONOLOGY: EXPLAIN
HOW ADVOCANTS SF LEXICAL MORPHOLOGY WOULD EXPLAIN THE
FOLLOWING GRAMMATICALLITY CONTRAST. DO NOT FORGET TO INCLUDE
A PHONOLOGICAL TRANSCRIPTION AS EVIDENCE FOR YOU ANSWER
Example:
*Natury Natural
INPUT: "Nature" /neɪtʃə/ (N) + "-al" (Class Changing Suffix)
OUTPUT: Natural /nætʃərəl/ (Adj)
There are changes in: /eɪ/ to /æ/ so, in Quantity and Quality
[REMEMBER: DIFFERENCE OF SOUNDS =/QUALITY/, SHORT TO LARGE OR VICE-
VERSA =/QUANTITY/]
EXPLANATION: The affixation of the suffix "-al" to "nature" is phonologically NON-
NEUTRAL. The existence of "natural" at Stratum 1 will block the creation of a correspond
word at Stratum 2.
COUNTER-EXAMPLE
* Cremal Creamy
INPUT: "Cream" /krɪm/ + "-y" (Class Changing Suffix)
OUTPUT: Creamy /krɪmɪ/
There is no change in Stress, Quantity or Quality, so it is phonologically NEUTRAL. The
existence of "creamy" at Stratum 2 will block the creation of a correspond word at Stratum 1.
[THE SCHWA COULD BE ELSEWHERE THE STRESS IS]
Pregunta Nº5: ARE THE FOLLOWING WORDS PROBLEMATIC FOR THE
STRUCTURALIST SCHOOL OF MORPHOLOGY? IF SO, HOW ARE THESE
PROBLEMS CIRCUNVENTED IN WORD-BASED MORPHOLOGY?
Always 3 words: An irregular (Past, Plural), a "-berry" word and a regular word (Trap)
-Gooseberry: IF, and only IF the Morpheme "Goose" can be understood as the texture
of the berry, it will be Group 1, Morpheme + Morpheme, and it would be treated as an
Endocentric Compound. If a Native Speaker observe this word, it would be Group 3,
an Unique Morpheme + Morpheme that do not reoccur elsewhere.
- Were can also be Suppletion (From Is) or Allomorphy from the past (Was/Were)
Pregunta Nº5: ARE THE FOLLOWING WORDS PROBLEMATIC FOR THE
STRUCTURALIST SCHOOL OF MORPHOLOGY? IF SO, HOW ARE THESE
PROBLEMS CIRCUNVENTED IN WORD-BASED MORPHOLOGY?
Words as: Comfort > Discomfort and Uncomfortable are Grammatically Conditioned
(Also called Morphologically Conditioned)
NATO: Acronym
TYPE B: Pronounced as a word
MEANING: Stands for North-Atlantic-Treaty-Organization
Lawnmower: Compound
INPUT: "Lawn" (N) + "Mower" (N) (Class Maintaining Suffix)
OUTPUT: Lawnmower (N)
TYPE: Endocentric: There is hyponymy relationship between the overall meaning of
the compound and the meaning of the head. In other words, Lawnmower is a mower
which cuts Lawn.
MEANING: A lawnmower is a kind of mower.
ARGUMENT STRUCTURE: Something that cuts the lawn.
List of Complete Examples
-Word-Formation Exercise
Gamekeeper: Compound
INPUT: "Game" (N) + Keeper (N) (Class Maintaining Suffix)
OUTPUT: Gamekeeper (N)
TYPE: Endocentric: There is hyponymy between the overall meaning of the
compound and the meaning of the head. In other words, "Gamekeeper" is a kind of
Keeper.
MEANING: A Gamekeeper is a kind of Keeper who protects forests.
ARGUMENT STRUCTURE: X Keeps the Game.
EXAMPLES: Goalkeeper, Zookeeper, Timekeeper.
Sci-Fi: Clipping and Compounding, but we can say that it is only clipping
INPUT: "Science" (N) + "Fiction" (N) (Class Maintaining Suffix)
OUTPUT: "Science-Fiction" (N)
DERIVATIVE FORM: Sci-Fi (N)
MEANING: A Genre for movies, music, comics, ect...
TYPE: It is a case of clipping since you delete the second part of the word and all you keep is three
letters from science and two from fiction.
List of Complete Examples
-Word-Formation Exercise
Amerindian: Blending
INPUT: "American" (Adj) + "Indian" (Adj) (Class Maintaining Suffix)
OUTPUT: "Amerindian" (Adj)
MEANING: A person or object that is from America and India.
TYPE: A case of word-formation by means of a blending process, since a totally new word has
merged from parts of two other words.
Hazmat: Clipping
INPUT: "Hazardous" (Adj) + "Material" (N) (Class Maintaining Suffix)
OUTPUT: "Hazardous-Materials" (N)
DERIVATIVE FORM: Hazmat (N)
MEANING: Materials that are Hazard, in other words, with risk of death.
TYPE: It is a case of clipping since you delete the second part of the word and all you keep is the
first three letters from both words.
Amphetamine: Blending
INPUT: "Alphametyl" (N) + "Phenethylamine" (N)
OUTPUT: "Amphetamine" (N)
MEANING: It is a chemical product or a drug
TYPE: A case of word formation by means of a blending process, since a totally new word has
merged from parts of two other words.
List of Complete Examples
-Word-Formation Exercise
AIDS: Acronym
TYPE B: Pronounced as a Word.
MEANING: Stands for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
[Also, HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus]
NASA: Acronym
TYPE B: It is pronounced as sequence of letters.
MEANING: Stands for National Aeronautic and Space Agency
JFK: Acronym
TYPE B: It is pronounced as a sequence of letters.
MEANING: Stands for John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the president and the airport after the president.
Brainwash: Compound
INPUT: "Brain" (N) + "Wash" (V) (Class Changing Suffix)
OUTPUT: "Brainwash" (V)
TYPE: Exocentric: There is no hyponymy between the overall meaning of the head and the
meaning of the compound. In other words, a brainwash is not a kind of wash, but a
manipulation.
MEANING: To manipulate someone
METAPHOR: There is a metaphor with the use of "Wash" because even if it is not a kind of wash,
it is referring to "Clean" other person's mind with one intention.
ARGUMENT STRUCTURE: X washes somebody's brain
List of Complete Examples
-Word-Formation Exercise
USSR: Acronym
TYPE B: It is pronounced as a sequence of letters.
MEANING: Stands for Union of Soviet Socialist Republicans.
CSI: Acronym
TYPE B: It is pronounced as a sequence of letters
MEANING: Stands for Crime Scene Investigation
Deli: Clipping
INPUT: "Delicatessen" (N)
OUTPUT: "Delicatessen" (N)
BASE: "Delicatessen" (N)
DERIVATIVE FORM: "Deli" (N)
MEANING: Something exquisite and rare to find
TYPE: It is a case of clipping since you delete the second part of the word and all you keep is the
first four letters.
Dorm: Clipping
INPUT: "Dorm" (N) +"-ory" (N) (Class Maintaining Suffix) [Readjustment in it]
OUTPUT: "Dormitory" (N)
BASE: "Dormitory" (N)
DERIVATIVE FORM: "Dorm" (N)
MEANING: A place where someone sleeps
TYPE: It is a case of clipping since you delete the second part of the word and all you keep is the
first four letters.
List of Complete Examples
-Word-Formation Exercise
BBC: Acronym
TYPE B: It is pronounced as a sequence of letters.
MEANING: Stands for British Broadcasting Corporation
List of Complete Examples
-Lexical Morphology
COUNTER-EXAMPLE:
OUTPUT: Running *Runment
INPUT: "Run" (V) /rʌn/ + "-ing" (Class Changing suffix)
OUTPUT: "Running" (N) / rʌnɪŋ/
There is no change in stress, quantity and quality.
The affixation of the suffix "-ing" to "Run" is phonologically NEUTRAL. The existence
of "Running" at Stratum 2 will block the creation of a correspond word at Stratum 1.
List of Complete Examples
-Lexical Morphology
COUNTER-EXAMPLE:
OUTPUT: *Despicableable Despicability
INPUT: "Despicable" (Adj) / dɪspɪ'kəbəl/ + "-ability" (Class Changing suffix)
OUTPUT: "Despicability" (N) /despɪkəbɪlətɪ/
There is a change in stress, quantity.
The affixation of the suffix "-ability" to "Despicable" is phonologically NON-
NEUTRAL. The existence of "Despicability" at Stratum 1 will block the creation of a
correspond word at Stratum 2.
List of Complete Examples
-Lexical Morphology
COUNTER-EXAMPLE:
OUTPUT: *Inview Interview
INPUT: "View" (N) /vju:/ + "Inter-" (Class Changing suffix)
OUTPUT: "Interview" (N) /ɪntəvju:/
There is no change in stress, quantity.
The affixation of the suffix "Inter-" to "View" is phonologically NEUTRAL. The
existence of "Interview" at Stratum 2 will block the creation of a correspond word at
Stratum 1.
-Trap Question (Possible Words)
Phonological Conditioning
When the following morpheme is responsible for the realization of the base.
Consume + tion: Consumption: Assimilation of -e-e but not a problem
Phenomenon + a: Singular to plural
Stratum + a: Singular to plural
Cactus + i: Singular to plural
Submit + tion: Submission > Assimilation, but not a problem
Permit + Tion: Permission > Assimilation but not a problem
Loaf, Elf, Wife, Knife, Thieve: Loaves, Elves, Wives, Knives, Thieves (Plural)
Lexical Conditioning
Brother: Brethren
Ox: Oxen
Child: Children
Man: Men
Woman: Women
Tricky Words Gallows: "" "" "" "" Cadalso
With p, b and m, the n becomes m like: Offspring: "" "" "" "" Retoño
Inpolite>Impolite / Enpower> Empower Species/Series: Plural irregular
With TWO exceptions: Unpopular and Bird> Flock: Bandada de pájaros
Inmigrant Fish: School: Banco de peces
Flee: Fled (Past) Huir Produce /Cosecha/ > To produce
Fling: Flung (Arrojar) (Conversion by Zero D.)
Inlay: Inlaid (Incrustar) Alight: Alit (Posarse) (Irregular past)
Slit: Slit (Rajar) Bid: Bade (Pujar)
Mown: Cortar, comes from Mow-ed-n Clothe: Clad (Vestirse)
Shed: Shed: Shed, Mudar la piel Dwell: Dwelt: (Rayar)
Rid, rid, rid: Lobrarse de Abide: Abode (Acatar)
Sown, Sow-ed-n, Sembrar Potatoes and Tomatoes (Irregular -es),
Stride, Strode, Striden: Andar a Zancadas other words ended in -o may end in -s
Vex, Vext, Vext: Enfadar a alguien Criterion> Criterioa
Axis> Axes (Plural) Phenomenon> Phenomena
Basis> Bases (Plural) Fungi> Fungus
Crisis> Crises (Plural) Appendix> Appendices
Thesis> Theses (Plural) Curriculum> Curricula
Barracks (Singular Neutro o Plural Irregular) Genus> Genera
Barracon
The End - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -