Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Charlie Harris Jr
Table of Contents
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Introduction
Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was born in the village of Mvezo in Umtama, then part of
South Africa’s Cape Province. Mandela received the name Nelson from his English teacher
when he attended school. Mandela began getting politically involved in 1942. He joined the
African National Congress in 1944 and helped to form the African National Congress Youth
League (ANCYL). Mandela began actively campaigning against the National Party’s policy of
Mandela ascended while at the ANCYL but overtime they were no closer to helping end
apartheid. As a result, they changed their philosophy and began more guerrilla warfare-like
tactics to further their cause to end apartheid. Because of those tactics, Mandela had to go on the
run and did so for 17 months. He was eventually captured, tried and convicted. Mandela was
imprisoned for 27 years. He was finally released from prison on February 11, 1990. Mandela
immersed himself in official talks to end white minority rule and in 1991 was elected African
On April 27, 1994 Mandela voted for the first time in his life in South Africa’s first
multiracial elections. Then on May 10, 1994 he was inaugurated as South Africa’s first
democratically elected President. As president, Mandela was instrumental in the transition from
minority rule and apartheid, winning international respect for his advocacy of national and
international reconciliation. True to his promise, Mandela stepped down in 1999 after one term
as President. He continued to work with the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund he set up in 1995
and established the Nelson Mandela Foundation and The Mandela Rhodes Foundation (‘Nelson
“Servant leadership is based on six aspects that include authenticity, building community,
sharing and providing leadership, as well as valuing people” (as sited in Penn State, 2014, para
4). Mandela’s servant leadership style played a key role in leading his people before and after
their independence. Mandela responsibilities included coordinating all volunteer activities of the
ANCYL. Mandela trained his team on how to get people who are segregated and marginalized
to act against the opposition government. Mandela arranged and traveled with his team to every
part of South Africa in the 1950s. Mandela along with his team spoke to people convincing them
they could do something about their oppression. He warned his followers to not be intimidated
by the opposition government and do not retaliate in the face of verbal and physical abuse.
Although Mandela accomplished the servant leader theory, he was accused of adopting
the autocratic leadership style. Mandela did not always consult with other ANCYL leaders about
who to bring into the ANCYL, organizing events, making travel arrangements and strategies to
end apartheid. Because Mandela was an autocratic leader lead him to adopt guerrilla warfare-
like tactics in hopes to bring equally to South Africa. Instead of leading his group to peaceful
and nonviolent acts of protest toward the South African government, his group launched five
bomb attacks on power stations and government buildings. After the attack, Mandela left his
group for military training. Mandela was arrested upon his return for sabotage and incriminating
evidence related to his guerrilla warfare-like tactics. Consequently, Mandela was tried and
sentenced to life in prison. Mandela’s autocratic leadership style lead him and some of his
Lastly, throughout his tenure as President of the ANCYL, Mandela utilized legitimate power to
After Mandela prison release, he returned to the fight toward equality in South Africa.
To continue his fight, Mandela ran for President of South Africa and won the election. Mandela
served as President from May 1994 until June 1999. While president, he worked to protect the
economy of South Africa from collapsing. Mandela also felt it was needed to address the
economic legacy of apartheid. The legacy included inequalities, infrastructure, poverty, unequal
social services access, and an economy that was in crisis for almost two decades. In 1994,
Mandela worked with his African National Congress (ANC) government to introduce the
Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP). The RDP was a socio-economic policy
framework to ease poverty and address the gaps in social services. Through his participative
leadership style, the ANC was able to utilize the RDP to fund the creation of employment, health
care and housing. Lastly, working with the ANC is a total contrast of his leadership style while
singed a new bill in 1996 to establish a solid central government built on majority rule, the rights
of subgroups, and the liberty of expression. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa
Bill was accepted by the Constitutional Court and went into effect in 1997. The Constitution
was founded on the following values: (a) Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the
advancement of human rights and freedoms. (b) Non-racialism and non-sexism. (c) Supremacy
of the constitution and the rule of law (‘South African History Online,” 2015, para. 8). Because
Mandela utilized a participative approach, he was able to get the court to pass the bill.
Application of Effective Leadership 6
Mandela then used his participative leadership style to get the Growth, Employment and
Redistribution (GEAR) macroeconomic policy introduced. Working with ANC, they introduced
policies pointed at the liberalization of the South African economy. The policies included a
flexibility in labor markets, strict deficit reduction targets, and monetary policies aimed at
stabilizing the rand through market interest rates (‘South African History Online,” 2015, para. 9).
If Mandela would have attempted to use his previous autocratic style, the policy might not have
Mandela led the country through a period of transition from apartheid to black majority
rule. As a transformational leader, he successfully used the country’s love for sports to promote
reconciliatory efforts and hosted the Rugby World Cup in 1995 which further instilled a sense of
nationalistic pride in its people and promoted reconciliation. Under the new constitution,
Mandela ensured that the rights of minorities and freedom of expression was incorporated under
the system of black majority rule (‘Biography Channel Website,” 2013, para. 12). Mandela
proved by adapting to the transformational theory and utilizing the participative leadership style
he can working with others in order to minimize the effects of apartheid. Finally, because of his
prestige power he was able to get his political party’s respect and the courts to implement his
policies.
Mandela’s situational leadership behavior as the President of ANCYL had a costly effect
on him, his followers and the organization’s goals. Mandela allowed his lack of progress toward
ending apartheid lead him to abandon the concept of nonviolence protest. Instead, his tasks
Application of Effective Leadership 7
became to use his power and influence to convince his followers to adopt to militant tactics of
protest. Unfortunately, his situational leadership behavior to switch tactics decreased the
organization probabilities from reaching their goal of freedom from oppression. Consequently,
his leadership effectiveness landed him and some of his followers in prison. Finally, Mandela’s
Mandela understood his followers and their longing to be free from oppression. His
followers believed his vision embodied the right strategy to end bigotry in South Africa. As a
result, his followers possessed a strong yearning to achieve their self-actualization desires of
being free from segregation. Correspondingly, his followers felt empowered to implement the
necessary measures to accomplish their common objectives and were eager to abide by the
guidance from Mandela. In addition, his followers were so loyal to Mandela’s ideology they
were willing to die in order to bring equality. Lastly, his followers were loyal to a fault and
could have determined a different fate if they did not follower Mandela’s situational leadership
behavior.
relationship-oriented leader when he was in the role of the South Africa President. The
relationship-oriented leader is concerned with people. Mandela tasked himself as President with
always trying to get involved with all people in South Africa no matter their race to be
acceptable and caring to each other. As president he showed through his advocacy, proposals
and policies he was passionate about all people in South Africa and listened to their concerns.
To sum up, through his relationship-oriented leadership, he was able to meet most of his party’s
Because Mandela was a relationship-oriented leader, his followers understood the need to
push his agenda for equality for their country. His followers understood their goals and work
feverously to work with opposing members of government and galvanize people to achieve a
more equal country and economy. Mandela’s followers were willing to travel through South
Africa to unifying resistance to inequitable legislation and get the support of the people. To sum
up, “Workers who feel they can change the shape of the company become empowered
automatically; because they have no fear of retaliation in a company that actively pursues shared
vision and decision-making processes, Mandela infused the lives of his followers with meaning
and significance, helping them to understand the fight against apartheid in order to eliminate
Mandela could have prevented serving prison time if he would have adapted to a
participative leadership style instead of being an autocratic leader. For example, if he would
have involved other ANCYL leaders, it may have prevented him from resorting to war-like
tactics to end apartheid. Secondly, operating under a participative leadership style would have
helped with finding better solutions from his followers and peers to fight bigotry and
discrimination. Thirdly, this style would have led Mandela to not only ask for his follower’s
opinions, but it could have encouraged them to make joint decisions. In addition, Mandela
should have allowed more open and honest communication with his followers. By doing so,
could have prevented him from being a fugitive for several months before his imprisonment.
Finally, Mandela’s participant leadership style would have had a greater impact with getting
policies passed like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights movement.
Application of Effective Leadership 9
As president of South Africa, Mandela could have been more effective in his role if he
would have separated from the Cabinet members who underperformed in their roles. Because of
his loyalty, “Mandela was viewed by other members in his political party as tolerance of
mediocrity which laid the seeds for greater levels of mediocrity and corruptibility that were to
come from his party” (Torchia, 2013, para. 6). As a result, Mandela should have been more
attentive to the concerns of other members of his political party who witnessed their mediocrity
and foretold what was to come if he did not take immediate action. Furthermore, if Mandela
would have acted, his political party would not have lost support. In addition, Mandela should
have utilized legitimate power to rid himself of those Cabinet members. In summary, this action
could have prevented future corruption scandals and poor serves provided to the people by his
References
http://www.biography.com/people/nelson-mandela-9397017
Torchia, C. (2013, December 8). Nelson Mandela: Remembering an icon, his flaws remain a
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/nelson-mandela-remembering-an-icon-his-flaws-remain-a-
footnote-1.1579248
http://jcc-good-leadership.tripod.com/id8.html
https://www.nelsonmandela.org/content/page/biography
Penn State. (2014, February 14). Nelson Mandela as a Leader. Retrieved from
https://sites.psu.edu/leadership/author/edl5082/
South African History Online. (2015, July 16). The Nelson Presidency – 1994 to 1999.
Retrieved from
https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/nelson-mandela-presidency-1994-1999