Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
Content
1. Description of the Problem ...................................................................................................... 3
2. Background .............................................................................................................................. 4
4. Discussion of Results............................................................................................................. 16
2
1. Description of the Problem
According to the EPA’S NAAQs carbon monoxide is in the primary standards which have
defined the maximum level of carbon to be 9 ppm for 8-hour time and 35 ppm for 1-hour time. To
ensure the level of carbon dioxide emitted at the intersection of E. Colonial Drive an Alafaya Trail
meets these criteria, a model in the MOVES software has been developed. A scale drawing of the
overhead view and the links within the intersection will be produced.
The turning movement diagram as the week-day peak was provided (Figure 3)
Traffic count data and signal timing (Table 1)
Signal cycling time: 150 seconds
Speed limit 45 mph for Alafaya Trail, 50 mph for Colonia Drive at normal driving
conditions
34 N-S through 52 s 3s 95 s
Worst case scenario (peak hour congestion): January from 17:00 to 17:59 on a weekday
Cruise speed for this scenario for Alafaya Trail is 20 mph and an acceleration speed of
10 mph
Cruise speed for this scenario for Colonial Drive is 25 mph and an acceleration speed
of 12 mph
Surface roughness: 321 cm corresponding to City-land use of central business district
Receptor surface breathing height of 6 ft (1.8 m)
3
The worst-case scenario (F=6) was used as a stability class for meteorological parameters
2. Background
The intersection of Colonial Drive and Alafaya Trial located in proximity to the University of
Central Florida is being investigated for potential CO impacts (Figure 1). There is a total for six
lanes from both Alafaya Trail and Colonial Drive that divide into two left turning lanes and a right
turning lane.
E. Colonial Drive
3. Modeling Approach
To determine the CO impacts near the Colonial Drive and Alafaya Trail, the EPA’s Motor
Vehicle Emission Simulator model (MOVES) was employed. The mobile source emissions can be
modeled at a national, county and project level. The project-level scale was used as it can be used
4
for hot-spot analyses that can be related to transportation. In our case, we would like to analyze a
specific intersection (Alafaya/Colonial).
(i) MOVES
Project links:
The area of study has been divided into 32 links. The average cruise link spend over Colonial
is 50 mph, and thus 45 mph for Alafaya. The Queue average speed is 0 mph. The average
acceleration cruise link speed is 22.5 mph and 25 mph for Alafaya and Colonial respectably. The
delineation of the links is presented in Error! Reference source not found.. However, to model
the worst-case condition at peak hour lower speeds as described previously in assumptions have
been chosen.
5
Figure 3. Geometric configuration for the interception of Alafaya Trail and East Colonial Drive
(distances are in feet; receptor coordinates unit are in UTM)
MOVES Inputs:
Scale Project
Time Spans
Aggregate by Hour
Year 2019
Month January
6
Days Weekday
MOVES output:
The Emission quantities per each link after running MOVES are summarized in Table 3.
7
6 3726.58 400 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.270980787
7 1022.98 2960 0.0473485 0.0473485
7.263472417 N/A
8 460.433 2960 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983554552 N/A
9 130.663 840 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983550211 N/A
10 7825.84 840 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.271001099
11 991.872 2870 0.0473485 0.0473485
7.263429951 N/A
12 446.433 2870 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983556652 N/A
13 54.443 350 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983572394 N/A
14 3260.76 350 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.270978215
15 705.876 2400 0.0473485 0.0473485
6.181378542 N/A
16 323.871 2400 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.323408239 N/A
17 460.433 2960 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983554552 N/A
18 120.724 2960 0.008143942 0.008143942
4.983577195 N/A
19 102.664 660 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983566183 N/A
20 6148.87 660 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.270996896
21 55.3281 410 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.323416854 N/A
22 3819.75 410 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.27099183
23 323.871 2400 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.323408239 N/A
24 22359.5 2400 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.27098934
25 116.054 860 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.32342709 N/A
26 8012.16 860 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.270998636
27 83.9979 540 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983558666 N/A
28 5030.9 540 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.271016096
29 446.433 2870 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.983556652 N/A
30 26738.2 2870 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.270967576
31 51.332 330 0.031060616 0.031060616
4.98354219 N/A
32 3074.43 330 0.008143942 0
#DIV/0! 9.270983246
(ii) CAL3QHC
CAL3QHC Inputs:
8
Deposition velocity 0 cm/s
Number of receptors 12
Output in feet 1
Source height 0 ft
Source height 0
9
Traffic volume 2960 veh/hr
Source height 0 ft
Source height 0 ft
Source height 0 ft
10
Traffic volume 2870 veh/hr
Source height 0 ft
Source height 0 ft
Source height 0 ft
11
Traffic volume 2700 veh/hr
Source height 0 ft
X2, Y2 coordinates 0, 35 ft
Source Height 0 ft
Source Height 0 ft
X1, Y1 coordinates 0, 35 ft
12
Traffic volume 2400 veh/hr
Source Height 0 ft
Wind direction 00
13
Figure 4. CAL3QHC Input Structure
CAL3QHC Output:
14
15
Figure 5. CAL3QHC Outputs
4. Discussion of Results
The emission results obtained from MOVES were used as input variables for CAL3QHC.
The CAL3QHC output file shows the highest concentration of 46.70 PPM occurred at the
receptor “REC6”. The receptors “REC5”, “REC7”, “REC8”, “REC9”, “REC10”, “REC11”,
16
and “REC12” are below the accepted concentration of 35 PPM. However, the receptors
“REC1”, “REC2”, “REC3”, “REC4”, and “REC6” are above the specified CO concentration.
17