Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Unique lightweight
solutions for the
Aerospace Industry
Europe
(incl.
Russia)
North
24,176
America
3,709
Asia-Pacific
Middle and 4,620
South America
Middle East,
611
Africa
125
Worldwide
33,241
employees
Status as of 31-12-2014
Products and expertise in almost all
composite sub-components
Composite sandwich system – schematic view
Thermoplastics Thermosets
VESTAKEEP® Matrix COMPIMIDE®
VESTAMID® HTplus Interface CALIDUR®
VESTAMID® L
Fiber
TROGAMID®
VISIOMER®
Darmstadt
Mobile Shanghai
6. Sandwich structure
Customer
5. Net-Shaped cores
2. Co-Polymer Sheet
Standard
ROHACELL®
Tension grades 3 - 4%
9 - 10%
Elongation
1. Evonik supports the composite market
2. The advantages of using PMI foam
3. A new ductile PMI product development - HERO
4. Testing of HERO to fulfill structural requirements
5. Conclusion
Mechanical performance - standard tests
Objective:
Prove that a ROHACELL® HERO sandwich provides the same damage visibility
after an impact as a honeycomb sandwich.
Test at -55°C
Impact depth after 48 hours
3,0
2,0
1,0
Impact-Energy [J]
Impact 10J at 23°C X-cut specimen
Test procedure
(ASTM C393)
HERO outperforms Honeycomb
in comparison
1,00
0,80
Cycled fatigue specimens failed
due to core shear cracking
0,60
max/UL [-]
~ +52%
0,40
CFRP/71HERO Sandwich
CFRP/71WF Sandwich**
0,20
CFRP/NOMEX ECA 3.2/48 L*
CFRP/NOMEX ECA 3.2/48 W*
0,00
1,E+00 1,E+01 1,E+02 1,E+03 1,E+04 1,E+05 1,E+06 1,E+07
1,5
Shear strength [Mpa]
1,2 1,19
1,0
0,5
0,0
uncycled 55% UL, after 5 Mio. cycles
Fatigue loaded specimen of 55% UL with 5 Mio. load cycles failed in the
same force range as the uncycled specimen (= quasi-static test) !
Proven stability at high temperatures and
pressures
Compressive Creep
Compressive creep [%]
Out-time investigation at
23°C / 50% RF and
27°C / 70% RF is running.
HERO outperforms honeycomb
4 - Superior
3 - Excellent Damage visibility Honeycomb
2 - Very good 4
1 - Good HERO
0 - Unacceptable
3
Design freedom
Demonstrator and evaluation part:
Nose Landing Gear Door (NLGD)
Foam / Infusion
This foam sandwich part was originally constructed as a 71/200 WF core in infusion
technique for Do728. All qualification steps were made. Now, it was optimized for 71
HERO with dry fabrics to stay in infusion manufacturing technique.
Honeycomb / Prepreg
Baseline for the comparison is an NLG door similar to the A320 design and a process
using Nomex honeycomb (64 kg/m³ - 4,8 mm) and prepreg (Fibredux 913C-926-40%).
Foam / Prepreg
Additionally, we compare the foam with an Autoclave (Prepreg) process in a situation
where honeycomb is replaced by foam, but the process stays the same (180°C / 50psi).
The time advantage:
Where are the main differences?
Comparison of time by process step
10
Prepreg
8 instead of
infusion
Core
Time for each step [h]
2 shot
handling
curing
Honeycomb/Prepreg
6
Foam/Prepreg
Foam/Infusion
Core
4 handling
0
Cost advantage results:
Save 21 – 25 % using foam!
79
75 75
75
Cost share [%]
Honeycomb/Prepreg
50 44
40 Foam/Infusion
35 34
25
25 Foam/Prepreg
0
Material cost Labor and Machine Total cost
cost
Weight advantage results:
Save 19 % using foam!
100
100
81 81
75
Honeycomb/Prepreg
Weight [%]
No adhesive
film
50 Foam/Prepreg
No need for
potting Foam/Infusion
25
0
Design, analyze and test steps for the
NLG-demonstrator at a low cost
Test parameters:
1.9 kg gel bird / speed: 515 km/h
Evaluation:
Local delamination, but the part is still working and
can withstand all required aerodynamic loads.
Even without any rivets on the structure!
Easy handling
Ready-to-use parts
Conclusion
Solve Honeycomb
No water problem, better fit to CRFP
problems
Efficient
Reduce manufacturing costs
part production
Robust
damage behavior
Meet industry requirements for
damage tolerance and visibility
ROHACELL®
HERO
Excellent
Produce reliable structural components
mechanical properties
with long service life
and fatigue behavior
ROHACELL®
The Core of Sandwich Solutions Evonik Resource Efficiency
ron.vanhoorn@evonik.com
+31 612942791