Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 under the leadership of educational psychologist Dr Benjamin Bloom in order to promote higher forms
of thinking in education, such as analyzing and evaluating, rather than just remembering facts (rote learning).
Since the work was produced by higher education, the words tend to be a little bigger than we normally use. Domains can be thought of as
categories. Trainers often refer to these three categories as KSA (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitude). This taxonomy of learning behaviors can be
thought of as “the goals of the learning process.” That is, after a learning episode, the learner should have acquired new skills, knowledge, and/or
attitudes.
This compilation divides the three domains into subdivisions, starting from the simplest behavior to the most complex. The divisions outlined are
not absolutes and there are other systems or hierarchies that have been devised in the educational and training world. However, Bloom's
taxonomy is easily understood and is probably the most widely applied one in use today.
Cognitive Domain
The cognitive domain involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills (Bloom, 1956). This includes the recall or recognition of
specific facts, procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and skills. There are six major categories,
which are listed in order below, starting from the simplest behavior to the most complex. The categories can be thought of as degrees of
difficulties. That is, the first ones must normally be mastered before the next ones can take place.
This new taxonomy reflects a more active form of thinking and is perhaps more accurate:
Table of The Revised Cognitive Domain
Examples: Recite a policy. Quote prices from memory to a customer. Knows the safety
rules. Repeats what it was said in the classroom. Describes what one saw before. Repeat
Remembering: Recall previous learned what one read before.
information.
Key Words: defines, describes, identifies, knows, labels, lists, matches, names,
outlines, recalls, recognizes, reproduces, selects, states.
Examples: Rewrites the principles of test writing. Explain in one's own words the steps
for performing a complex task. Translates an equation into a computer spreadsheet.
Understanding: Comprehending the meaning, Explains what is wrong and right in his or her own life. Generalize appropriate habits in
translation, interpolation, and interpretation of learning settings. Comprehend own strength and weaknesses in his or her own learning.
instructions and problems. State a problem in
one's own words. Key Words: comprehends, converts, defends, distinguishes, estimates, explains,
extends, generalizes, gives an example, infers, interprets, paraphrases, predicts,
rewrites, summarizes, translates.
Applying: Use a concept in a new situation or Examples: Use a manual to calculate an employee's vacation time. Apply laws of
unprompted use of an abstraction. Applies what statistics to evaluate the reliability of a written test. Make decisions based on
was learned in the classroom into novel situations objectiveness. Constructs a routine to develop appropriate habits. Shows positive
in the work place or personal life. attitudes to actions. Modifies his or her behavior in different ways: home, university,
friends, strangers, etc.
Examples: figure out how to work a piece of equipment by using logical deduction.
Recognize logical fallacies in reasoning. Gathers information from a department and
selects the required tasks for training. Contrast different types of human behavior.
Analyzing: Separates material or concepts into
Deconstruct from simple to complex concepts to deeply understand. Discriminate types
component parts so that its organizational
of reading texts. Separate relevant from irrelevant information.
structure may be understood. Distinguishes
between facts and inferences.
Key Words: analyzes, breaks down, compares, contrasts, diagrams, deconstructs,
differentiates, discriminates, distinguishes, identifies, illustrates, infers, outlines, relates,
selects, separates.
Examples: Select the most effective solution. Hire the most qualified candidate.
Explain and justify a new budget. Explain why one thinks in one way or another. Justify
why information is relevant or not. Summarize texts and opinions.
Evaluating: Make judgments about the value of
ideas or materials.
Key Words: appraises, compares, concludes, contrasts, criticizes, critiques, defends,
describes, discriminates, evaluates, explains, interprets, justifies, relates, summarizes,
supports.
Psychomotor Domain
The psychomotor domain (Simpson, 1972) includes physical movement, coordination, and use of the motor-skill areas. Development of these
skills requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or techniques in execution. The seven major categories
are listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex:
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A
Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn &
Bacon.
Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York, Academic Press
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Dave, R. H. (1975). Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. (R. J. Armstrong, ed.). Tucson, Arizona: Educational Innovators Press.
Harrow, A. (1972) A Taxonomy of Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York: David McKay.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals.
Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.:
Hawker Brownlow.
Simpson E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.
1. How many domains are there in knowledge and what are their names?
2. What are the levels of knowledge from low to high order thinking?
3. How many categories are there in the “affective domain”? Mention them:
4. How many categories are there in the psychomotor domain? Mention them:
5. Conceptualize each domain:
6. How important is each domain in “research”?
7. In which domain do you deal with “induction, deduction, reflecting, abstracting, concreting” Why?
8. How important is “to receive the phenomena category” in the affective domain for you to learn new things?
9. Whenever we involve in learning something new, there is a need to put into practice the domains. Can you suggest an activity in which
the domains are put into practice? Describe it:
10. From your point of view, which domain do you think is important to develop?