Tabel 1.

Analisis Artikel Jurnal Internasional

No Judul Nama Tujuan Jenis riset; Instrumen yang Analisis data Hasil dalam Pembahasan (yang Simpulan
Artikel Penulis, riset Populasi, besar digunakan yang bentuk mana hasil riset
Nama sampel, jenis (nama semua digunakan Pernyataan milik peneliti lain
Jurnal, sampel, dan instrumen yang yang
Volume, teknik digunakan, mendukung/berses
No, sampling; jumlah item, uaian dengan hasil
halaman pilihan jawaban, AJI tersebut dan
penskoran) yang mana hasil riset
milik peneliti lain
yang bertentangan
dengan hasil AJI
tersebut) dalam
bentuk pernyataan
1 Stakehol Grainne S. We test Populasi Kuesioner Analisis (1) low Only a few studies Urbanizat
der Maguire, these ideas surveyed 684 terdiri dari 23 varians awareness that focus on ion in
Perceptio James M. by firstly, people (18 pertanyaan berulang and ' dimensions of Australia
ns of Rimmer characteris years and mengenai (ANOVA) discomfort ' human interaction. berperngr
Threaten Michael ing older), 576 demografi dengan higher Specifically, several uh
managemen
ed A. Weston inconvenie responden, responden, tingkat α 0,05 studies documenting towards
t will
Species nce besar sampel termasuk pantai generate stakeholder attitudes the coast,
and Their Volume 3, associated adalah beach penggunaan dan less in his toward wildlife and and
Manage doi:10.339 with activity (88.4% kepemilikan favor wildlife resulted
ment on 0/ani3041 manageme and 64.6% of anjing, perception management, as well in the
Urban 002 nt and 577 kesadaran of as more specific changes
Beaches pre- respondents, Hooded conservatio research against the directly
ISSN existing respectively). Plovers, dan n and species required. on the
2076-2615 awareness Overall, 78.5% persepsi managemen coastline
of the of respondents ancaman dan t; and (2) and
Halaman focal visited known manajemen. frequency of increasin
the use of
1002-1020 species Hooded Plover g the use
the beach
and locations (n = Responden and the of the
relating 578; menilai ownership beaches
these to visiting 1.71 ± seberapa serius of dogs may in the
perception 0.07 Hooded mereka mediate the world.
s of Plover beaches; menganggap 14 perception This
and level of
manageme 0–14) , jenis ancaman article
awareness
nt and sampel terhadap and identifies
threats, kuantitatif, Hooded Plovers discomfort. low
and three sampling menggunakan awarenes
secondly techniques skala likert s and a
characteris (1) distributing (1 "tidak terlalu high
ing user 290 printed serius" sampai 5 discomfo
demograp questionnaires "sangat serius"). rt such as
hics on plover Delapan strategi correlated
according beaches, (2) perlindungan attitude
to letterbox drops (manajemen) di towards
frequency (100) darat, lima the
of beach adjacent to peraturan dan conservat
use and plover beaches sepuluh strategi ion of
whether a at Anglesea pendidikan threatene
person is a (38°25'39.82"S, masyarakat d species
dog- 144°10'42.51"E kemudian and
walker, ), Ocean Grove dicantumkan managem
and (38°16'15.96"S, dan responden ent.
exploring 144°32'46.50"E menilai Understa
how these ), Point bagaimana nding
influence Lonsdale efektif mereka perceptio
perception (38°17'5.72"S, pikir ini akan ns
s and 144°36'51.20"E untuk Managem
levels of ), Queenscliff meningkatkan ent
awareness (38°16'2.68"S, konservasi strategies
144°39'41.13"E can
 ) and Barwon plover (1 "tidak increase
Heads efektif" untuk communi
(38°16'53.78"S, 5 "sangat ty
144°29'31.26"E efektif"). Subset engagem
), and dari strategi ent,
(3) advertising konservasi ini avoiding
an online (15 item) dinilai unnecess
questionnaire oleh responden ary
to beach users pada conflict,
[35]. Reply skala 1 ("Saya and help
paid envelopes tidak in the
were provided menyukainya / managem
as tidak akan ent of
required and merepotkan fine-
respondents saya") sampai 5 tuning to
remained ("Saya suka / promote
anonymous tidak coexisten
merepotkan ce.
untuk saya").
Responden juga
menilai lima
item mengenai
persepsi mereka
tentang
pentingnya
melestarikan
Hooded
Plovers.
2. Populatio Alex de How to Simultaneous Support: Because of In the
n and Sherbinin1 know the and consistent the complexity of human-
Environm , David projections of population interactions environmen
interaction population, t system,
ent Carr2, as well as political
s between urbanization, issues, population the impacts
Susan
Cassels3, human and issues were not are not
and population households are considered in unidirection
Leiwen a formulation of the al but
dynamics challenging Kyoto Protocol (142) reciprocal.
Jiang4 and the demographic and have also been For
Leiserowitz environme tasks (147). largely excluded from example,
AA, Kates Recently, the Intergovernmental the
nt have
RW, Parris Dalton et al. Panel on Climate environmen
TM. 2006. often been
(148) Change (IPCC) tal change
Sustainabili viewed introduced assessment impacts on
ty values, mechanisti heterogeneous reports (143), morbidity
attitudes, cally households Does not support: and
and into a general although population mortality
behaviors: equilibrium projections are an are a
a review of population- integral part of the growing
environment- Special Report on area of
multination
technology Emissions Scenarios interest,
al and model of the (SRES) (144). and some
global U.S. have sought
trends. economy. to close the
Annu. Rev. Because circle by
Environ. different types looking at
Resour. of households how
31:413–44 have unique environmen
Eakin H, demands for tally
Luers AL. goods, capital induced
stock, mortality
2006.
and labor may affect
Assessing supply, and population
the these projections
vulnerabilit characteristics (2). There
y of social- have direct and is also
environmen indirect growing
tal systems. implications research on
Annu. Rev. for energy the health
Environ. demand, they impacts of
Resour. were landscape
incorporated or climatic
31:365–94
into cohorts by changes on
Gleick PH. age groups (or humans, in
2003. “dynasties”). the one
Water use. These instance
Annu. Rev. dynamics through the
and other creation
Environ.
relationships of mosquito
Resour. implied by breeding
28:275–314 household habitats
McGranaha projections that
n G, create contribute
Satterthwai nonlinear to malaria
te D. 2003. interacting (152), and
Urban effects in the other
centers: an that influence through
assessment each dynasty’s heat
future saving stress or
of
and famine
sustainabili consumption (153).
ty. Annu. decisions. Research
Rev. Their research on the
Environ. shows human-
Resour. that including environmen
28:243–74 age t system
Lambin EF, heterogeneity also takes
Geist HG, among U.S. advantage
Lepers E. households of
reduces new data
2003.
emissions by sources
Dynamics almost 40% in (remote
of land-use the low- sensing,
and land- population biophysical
cover scenarios by data, as
change in year 2050, and well as
tropical effects of georeferenc
regions. aging on ed
Annu. Rev. emissions can household
Environ. be as large surveys),
as, or larger new
Resour.
than, effects of technologie
28:205–41 technical s (high-
Kates RW. change in powered
2001. some cases. computers,
Queries on Those effects geographic
are believed to information
the human
be systems,
use of the much larger spatial
Earth. for the statistics),
Annu. Rev. developing and new
Energy world, where models
Environ. more (agent-
26:1–26 significant based,
demographic multilevel,
changes such and
as spatially
population explicit
growth, aging, modeling).
household Much
nuclearization, of the
and research
urbanization reviewed in
are occurring. this chapter
has sought
to
deconstruct
population
into its
component
parts and to
understand
how human
social
institutions
in all their
complexity
(e.g.,
markets,
policies,
communitie
 s) mediate
the impact
of
population
variables
on the use
of
resources,
waste
generation,
and
environmen
tal impacts.
Thus, they
could be
said to fit
into this
growing
understandi
ng of the
human-
environmen
t system.
3. Human John How to warming will Suport: Under these Thresholds
Harte know The still intensify unusual stresses, the lurk
populati in the future throughout
Published environme links
on as a because a that form life-sustaining nature: The
online: 11 ntal
dynamic steady level of synergies under natural ‘‘dose-
May 2007 conseque
emissions at conditions turn against response’’
factor _ Springer nces of the relation
the health
in Science+B increasing year 2000 rate of the system as they between
environ usiness human will lead to a amplify, rather than environmen
mental Media, population continuing dampen, stress (Harte, tal stresses
LLC 2007 size buildup of 1993; Harte, Torn, (such as
degradat are carbon dioxide acidity of
& Jensen, 1992).
ion dynamic in the Does not Suport: precipitatio
and atmosphere. While greenhouse gases n, or area of
nonlinear, To eventually result in global warming drained
stabilize the
not human at the Earth’s surface wetlands,
passive contribution to and in the or amount
and linear climate lower atmosphere, they of carbon
change, we result in a cooling of the dioxide
actually have stratosphere, thereby loaded to
to reduce increasing the
emissions ice-cloud formation atmosphere
down to a level there (IPCC, 2001). ) and the
at which the response of
removal of the natural
carbon dioxide environmen
from the t to that
atmosphere by stress (such
natural sinks as
will result in a acidificatio
constant n of soil
concentration and lake
of this water, or
greenhouse useful
gas. The figure lifetime of
sketches a an aquifer,
possible future or amount
trajectory of of warming
emissions that induced
would be by carbon
needed to dioxide) are
eventually often
accomplish the nonlinear,
goal of climate with
stabilization. threshold-
like
responses
increasing
faster than
stress over
a range of
stresses
relevant to
current
 conditions.
Thus,
even if
stresses are
merely
proportiona
l to
population,
the
responses
increase
faster than
proportiona
lly.

Tabel 2. Jabaran Variabel Penelitian

No. Variabel Subvariabel/Dimensi Indikator Skala Variabel dan Pilihan Instrumen atau Alat
Jawaban untuk Mengukur
Variabel