0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
12 Ansichten2 Seiten
The document discusses different types of immunity from criminal prosecution:
1. Generality - If the accused challenges jurisdiction due to their personal characteristics (e.g. foreigner) or where the crime took place (e.g. foreign vessel), the principles of generality or territoriality apply.
2. Consular and diplomatic immunity - Consular officers have immunity for acts in their official functions but not for slander or reckless actions causing death. Diplomatic agents have blanket immunity from civil and criminal suits.
3. Presidential immunity - A president cannot be prosecuted for official acts committed while in office, but a vice president could be prosecuted for plunder since it is not an official duty.
The document discusses different types of immunity from criminal prosecution:
1. Generality - If the accused challenges jurisdiction due to their personal characteristics (e.g. foreigner) or where the crime took place (e.g. foreign vessel), the principles of generality or territoriality apply.
2. Consular and diplomatic immunity - Consular officers have immunity for acts in their official functions but not for slander or reckless actions causing death. Diplomatic agents have blanket immunity from civil and criminal suits.
3. Presidential immunity - A president cannot be prosecuted for official acts committed while in office, but a vice president could be prosecuted for plunder since it is not an official duty.
The document discusses different types of immunity from criminal prosecution:
1. Generality - If the accused challenges jurisdiction due to their personal characteristics (e.g. foreigner) or where the crime took place (e.g. foreign vessel), the principles of generality or territoriality apply.
2. Consular and diplomatic immunity - Consular officers have immunity for acts in their official functions but not for slander or reckless actions causing death. Diplomatic agents have blanket immunity from civil and criminal suits.
3. Presidential immunity - A president cannot be prosecuted for official acts committed while in office, but a vice president could be prosecuted for plunder since it is not an official duty.
Generality - If the accused attacks the jurisdiction of the court
because of the unique characteristic of his person (e.g. he is a foreigner,
military, ambassador, President), the applicable principle is generality. If the accused attacks the jurisdiction of the court due to the unique characteristic of the place where the crime was committed (e.g. foreign vessel, embassy or high sea), the applicable principle is territoriality.
a. Consular and diplomatic immunity - Consular officers are
immune from criminal prosecution of acts performed in the exercise of function (1967 Convention on Consular Relation). Immunity does not cover slander (Liang vs. People, GR No. 125865, January 28, 2000), or reckless imprudence resulting in homicide for not being function-related. A Chinese diplomat, who killed another Chinese diplomat in Cebu, is immune from criminal prosecution (The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations). Unlike consular officers, diplomatic agents are vested with blanket diplomatic immunity from civil and criminal suits (Minucher vs. Hon. CA, G.R. No. 142396, February 11, 2003).
b. Presidential immunity - The presidential immunity is subject the
following conditions: (1) the immunity has been asserted during the period of his incumbency and tenure; and (2) the act constituting the crime is committed in the performance of his duties.This immunity will assure the exercise of presidential functions free from any hindrance, considering that the Chief Executive is a job demands undivided attention (Estrada vs. Desierto, G.R. No. 146710-15, March 2, 2001).
It is submitted that a Vice-President even during his tenure could not
invoke immunity from criminal prosecution for plunder on the following reasons: (1) plunder are not his official conducts as Vice-President; (2) the job of the Vice-President unlike the head of the executive department does not demands undivided attention; (3) and the implementation principal penalty of imprisonment for plunder is not inconsistent with the constitutional provision on non-removal of impeachable officer except through impeachment since he can function as Vice-President while serving sentence in prison.However, accessory penalty of disqualification, which involved removal from office, is not implementable since the enforcement thereof will offend the constitutional provision on non-removal of impeachable officer. c. Parliamentary immunity - An incumbent Senator is not immune from suit for being a protector or coddler of trading of dangerous drugs under RA No. 9165. Legislator’s immunity is confined to parliamentary privilege from arrest while the Congress is in session in all offenses punishable by not more than 6 years imprisonment and parliamentary immunity from prosecution for libel in connection with any Congressional speech or debate.
Richard L. Bast, and Inter-World Development Corporation International Investigations, Incorporated v. Victor Michael Glasberg Jeanne Goldberg Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, P.C. J. Frederick Sinclair Thomas J. Curcio Carter & Kramer, P.C. Charles Warren Kramer Jacobovitz, English & Smith, P.C. David Benjamin Smith Barbara Ozella Reves Claude David Convisser William G. Billingham Nancy Gertner Jody L. Newman Roger A. Cox, and Antonia Leigh Pettit Patricia Griest John F. Davis Mary Audrey Larkin Lois Ames Delmar D. Hartley Anthony Joseph Pettit Maddona Lea Schamp Pettit, Removed to Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Anne Connell William C. Hillman, Richard L. Bast, and Inter-World Development Corporation International Investigations, Incorporated v. John F. Davis Anthony Joseph Pettit Maddona Lea Schamp Pettit, Removed to Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and Victor Michael Glasberg Jeanne Goldberg Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, P.C. J. Frederick Sinclair Thoma