Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

JOSÉ PROTACIO RIZAL MERCADO Y REALONDA - The objective was to disseminate the ideas and ideals of the

great Filipino patriot through the reading of his work


- Was said to be a Chinese mestizo and a genius - Catholics inside and outside Congress took the bill as an
- An ophthalmic surgeon who took up medicine in UST attempt to discredit the Catholic faith
- A poet, dramatist, essayist, novelist, historian, architect, - They challenged the compulsory nature of the bill as a
painter, sculptor, educator, linguist, musician, naturalist, violation of the religious freedom
ethnologist, land surveyor, engineer, farmer businessman, - There was allegedly a Pastoral Letter, which, while it praised
economist, geographer, cartographer, bibliophile, philologist, Rizal, branded his novels as heretical and impious
grammarian, folklorist, philosopher, translator, inventor,
magician, humorist, satirist, traveler, and prophet Rizal Bill was strongly opposed by three senators known as stout
- A national hero chosen by US Civil Governor William defenders of the Church:
Howard Taft in 1901
- Was a “millennial” of his generation a) Decoroso Rosales
b) Mariano Cuenco
ORIGINS OF THE RIZAL LAW c) Francisco “Soc” (Solder for Christ) Rodrigo

DECEMBER 20, 1898 - These parliamentarians were seen as “rabid Catholics”, who
denounced Rizal as anti-Catholic
- Decree issued by President Emilio Aguinaldo celebrating Rizal
- They charged that his writings were replete with “errors of
Day on JUNE 19
church dogma”
- Affirmed by the Philippine Commission on FEBRUARY 1, 1902
- For them, Filipino students were “immature” and unprepared
to understand Rizal’s writings
 Despite the observance of Rizal Day since 1898, no - They believe that the compulsion to read something against
systematic effort has been made by the government to one’s religious convictions was no different from a requirement
include the novels in schools to salute the flag, said to be an impairment of both freedom
 Rizal’s purpose in writing his novels was to “remove the veil of speech and freedom of religion.
of ignorance and superstition that had kept his countrymen - A possible conflict for Catholic Filipinos between their country
subservient to the Church and the Spanish government” and faith
 Therefore, Rizal was honored on Rizal Day, but his writings
were not disseminated because of pressure from the WALK-OUTS
Catholic Church to prevent his novels, deemed as “anti-
friar” APRIL 22, 1956
 Church pressure continued long after the Spaniards were
expelled from the Philippines in 1898 and 60 years after - Sunday newspapers all carried a statement from Catholic
the execution of Rizal bishops describing Rizal’s works as violating Church canon law
in heresy and schism
R.A. 1425 – THE RIZAL LAW - Opposition came from:
a) Catholic Action of the Philippines
- Senate Bill 438 was introduced to inspire and develop b) The Holy Name Society of the Philippines
nationalism, inspire civic consciousness, as well to teach c) Legion of Mary
civic values d) Knights of Columbus
- To promote patriotism among the Filipino youth e) Daughters of Isabela
- That the Filipino youth would be incorruptible, be confident,
have courage, and determination to move forward in their For Claro Recto, the bill would foster better appreciation of Rizal’s
journey towards an abundant life (Jose P. Laurel) times and of the role he played in combating Spanish tyranny in the
- Sen. Jose P. Laurel and Sen. Claro Recto sponsored Senate country.
Bill 438 that “required the inclusion in the curricula of all
private and public schools the life, works and writings of Rizal, CONSTANTINO’S RIZAL BILL, COULD BE FOUND IN MAKING OF
particularly his Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo in their THE FILIPINO
unexpurgated form.”
- Recto’s belief that the reading of Rizal’s novels would
strengthen the Filipinism of the youth and foster patriotism
JOSE LAUREL – TRIALS OF THE RIZAL BILL
a) CLARO RECTO – original author of the bill
- There were heated disputes over the legislation of the Rizal
b) JOSE LAUREL – sponsor of the bill through a senate
Bill
committee
- The passing of the law was full of bitterness and recrimination
- Tackled the opposition and discussed the existence of a
that attended its enactment
pastoral letter detailing Church objections to the bill and
- Senator Jose P. Laurel, Chairman of the Senate Committee of
enjoining Catholics to oppose it
Education, sponsored Senate Bill 438

Page 1 of 3
JJCBUENAFE – 2J PH
- Parts of the novels were considered objectionable matter by SCHUMACHER – THE RIZAL BILL OF 1956 (HORACIO DE LA
the hierarchy COSTA AND THE BISHOPS)
- Catholics had the right to refuse to read so as not to
endanger their salvation - Several pastoral letter drafts
- Recto’s Bill was to be Recto’s revenge against the Catholic - FR. HORACIO DE LA COSTA, S.J. – lone figure in the Church
voters who, together with Magsaysay, were responsible for who supported the bill
his poor showing in the 1955 senatorial elections - Debates also tackled a proposal by anti-Bill Catholic senator
Rodrigo, who suggested that an exception be made as to
CATHOLIC ACTION OF MANILA – “kill” the Rizal Bill editions which contain annotations approved by the Church
- The exact provision of the exemption was by which a student
FR. JESUS CAVANNA who would “serve written notice under oath, to the head of the
college or university that the reading and study of the
- Said the novels belong to the past
unexpurgated edition is contrary to his religion or his religious
- Said that it would be harmful to read them because they
beliefs, said student shall be exempt from using said edition.”
presented a false picture of conditions in the country at the
time CAROLINE HAU’S NECESSARY FICTION: PHILIPPINE LITERATURE
- The Noli Me Tangere was said to be an “attack on the clergy” AND THE NATION, 1946-1980
and that its objective was to “put the ridicule to the Catholic
faith” - Brought literature and nationalism together in the state’s
- The novel was not really patriotic because out of 333 pages, attempt to decolonize the culture of the country
only 25 contained patriotic passages while 120 were - State used literature to foster national consciousness by the
devoted to anti-Catholic attacks Filipino people and make “good” citizens of the Filipino youth
- Literary works shape the national character
CATHOLIC CHURCH OPPOSITION TO RIZAL BILL - The study of the heroes’ life and works
- The novels violated Catholic canon law on heresy and schism - The evils that Rizal denounced existed up to this day
- The novels painted a false picture of Philippine society - In Noli Me Tangere, you have the rise of a Filipino “knowable”
- The novels could sway the faith of young people who would community that became the conceptual basis of the Filipino
naturally be impressionable nation
- The novels said to violate freedom of belief
LEGACIES OF THE RIZAL LAW
WAS THE CHURCH UNITED IN ITS OPPOSITION?
- The Catholic Church lost the Rizal Bill battle in 1956, but it has
- While the Churches issued pastoral letters, Catholic won all other Filipino legislative battles, a testament to its
organizations and seminaries campaigned against the Bill power over Filipino society
- They argued that it “forced young students to read Rizal’s - Memorandum Order no. 247 directs the Secretary of
works, which had religious overtones” Education, Culture and Sports and the Chairman of the
- They argued that it would be a “violation of the constitutional Commission on Higher Education to fully implement R.A. 1425
freedom of religion and the freedom of conscience” - With the Rizal Law where the youth would study Rizal’s life
- Foreign priests and foreign nuns also participated in the and analyze his teachings and literary works, the Filipino
campaign youth would:
a) Gain inspiration and insight
WHY R.A. 1425 GOT PASSED b) Involve themselves in the community
c) Imbibe the virtues and values of Rizal and other
- Representatives of Catholic schools threatened to close down reputable leaders of the country
their schools d) Acquire proper direction and become better citizens
- In response, Recto threatened the nationalization of Catholic - Patriotism was promoted through the goals set by the former
schools if they shut down their schools board of National Education that involved:
- An amendment was approved where that allowed students to a) Showcase the relevance of Rizal’s ideals, thoughts,
apply for an “exemption” for religious reasons from reading teachings, and values to community life
the novels b) Application of Rizal’s ideas to the solution of the day
- The bill was passed by both the House and the Senate on to day problems encountered in contemporary life
May 17, 1956 c) Promote the understanding and appreciation of the
- On June 12, 1956, President Magsaysay signed the bill into qualities, conduct and character of Rizal
law as R.A. 1425 d) Foster the development of the moral character,
- According to the law, “An act to include in the curricula of all personal discipline, citizenship skills and vocational
public and private schools, colleges and universities courses on efficiency of the Filipino youth
the life, works, and writings of Jose Rizal, particularly his
novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, authorizing the
printing and distribution thereof, and for other purposes.”
Page 2 of 3
JJCBUENAFE – 2J PH
LIFE, WORKS, AND WRITINGS OF RIZAL: THE CONTEXT - In the 1850s and 1860s, the ports of Iloilo and Cebu opened
AND BACKGROUND OF RIZAL’S TIMES (PART 1) to foreign shipping, stimulating trade and agriculture in the
Visayas.
- United States: Civil War, Negro slavery, and the - New tracts of forestland on Negros were cleared for sugar
Emancipation Proclamation of 1863
- Russia: Czar Alexander II emancipated tens of millions of serf FOREIGN TRADE
- Mexico, just before Rizal’s birth in 1861, had a full-blooded
Zapotec Indian President - Manila was opened to world trade officially in 1834
- England under Queen Victoria- predominant imperial power - more diverse jobs, more money transactions and more cultural
in the world diversions
- Italy and Germany unified into powerful, political entities - Manila’s population increased from 100,000 in 1822 to
- China - divided up by Europeans after the Opium Wa 150,000 by the mid-1800s
- India - under British raj rule. The rest of Asia divided up - In the 1850s and 1860s, the ports of Iloilo and Cebu opened
amongst the Europeans to foreign shipping, stimulating trade and agriculture in the
- Japan - opened up by America to the world, ending its 214 Visayas
year isolation, with modernization - New tracts of forestland on Negros were cleared for sugar.
- Germany- a late imperial power; acquired colonies in Africa
and began seeking Pacific possessions. Nearly went to war OPENING OF THE SUEZ CANAL
with Spain over the Central Pacific Islands. If not for the
arbitration of Pope Leo XIII. - The Suez Canal was opened to world trade in 1869-
- By then, Spain was a fading power, having lost her rich dramatically decreased travel time from Europe and led to
colonies in Central and South America to revolution and many Spanish migrating to the Philippines
independence. By the late 1800s, the Spanish Empire was - enabled ilustrados to easily reach Europe from the Philippines
reduced to Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines (which for study and for travel
included Guam). - hastened the movement of people and of ideas from Europe
to the Philippines
THE PHILIPPINES DURING THE 18TH CENTURY - Domination of imports, exports and distribution by the British
and by the Chinese in the Philippines
- The rise of the export crop economy and monopolies
- Governor General Jose de Basco y Vargas who saw the
UNDER SPANISH GOVERNMENT
potential for large scale production of cash crops in the colony
- Basco established the Royal Company of the Philippines in CENTRALIZED
1785 to finance these projects
- The purpose was to make the colony self-supporting and self- - the Ministries of the Colonies established in Madrid in 1863-
sufficient exercised executive, legislative, judicial and religious powers.
- Repealed ban on Chinese merchants (lead to the rise of
Chinese mestizos) THE GOVERNOR GENERAL
- Began to open Manila to foreign traders
- The Tobacco monopoly – remittances - appointed by the Spanish monarch
- Cigar production – led to cultivation of abaca and sugar - Represents the King in all state and religious matters
- The rise of the Chinese mestizo (new immigrants linked - Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines
provincial producers to the world market) - The Vice Royal Patron over the religious affairs in the islands
- The Parian was established - The ex-officio President of the Royal Audiencia, which
- Indio and mestizo elites were a new middle class enjoyed judicial powers
- Many Indios became inquilinos were tenants/leaseholders of
agriculture land

THE GALLEON TRADE

- With the end of the Spanish empire in the America, the


Manila-Acapulco galleon which linked American and Asian
trade and which began in 1565, ended in 1815
- Manila was opened to world trade officially in 1834- city
became a “port of call”
- more diverse jobs, more money transactions and more cultural
diversions
- Manila’s population increased from 100,000 in 1822 to
150,000 by the mid-1800s
Page 3 of 3
JJCBUENAFE – 2J PH

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen