Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Imprescriptible
4. Cruz lent Jose his car until Jose finished his Bar exams. During the bar
exam month, Jose lent the car to his girlfriend, Jolie, who parked the
car at the Mall of Asia's open parking lot, with the ignition key inside
the car. Car thieves broke into and took the car. Is Jose liable to Cruz
for the loss of the car?
No, since Boyong paid for Asiong’s loan without his approval.
7. A borrowed B’s truck. During a fire which broke out in A’s garage,
he had time to save only one vehicle and he saved his car instead
of the truck. Is he liable for the loss of B’s truck? Why?
A is liable for the loss of B’s truck. The contract entered into
between them is a contract of loan where the bailee is liable for
the loss of the thing even if it should be through a fortuitous event,
if, being able to save the thing borrowed or his own thing, he
chose to save the latter.
1
9. What is a contract of precarium?
11. A is indebted to B for P500,000, B later borrowed A’s car but refused
to return it on the ground that A owed him some money. Is B correct?
No, B is not correct. The bailee cannot retain the thing loaned
on the ground that the bailor owes him something, even
though it may be by reason of expenses.
13. What contract is entered into when the thing delivered can be used
by the depository and he is obliged to pay interest for said use.
commodatum
14. Walter left his house to James with the instructions that the latter
would watch over it, preserve it and keep the house safe. What contract
was entered into between Walter and James?
lease of services
15. The liability of the school, its administrators and teachers, or the
individual, entity or institution engaged in child care over the minor
child for damage caused by the acts or omissions of the
unemancipated minor under their supervision, instruction or custody
shall be:
16. Virgilio owned a bare and simple swimming pool in his garden. MB, a
7-year old child, surreptitiously entered the garden and merrily
romped around the ledges of the pool. He accidentally tripped, fell
into the pool, and drowned. MB’s parents sued Virgilio for damages
arising from their child’s death, premised on the principle of
“attractive nuisance”. Is Virgilio liable for the death of MB?
No, since the pool was bare and had no enticing or alluring
gadgets, floats, or devices in it that would attract a 7-year old
child.
17. A deposited a car with B. A allowed B to deposit the car with a third
person. B then deposited the car with C. If through C’s carelessness,
the car is destroyed, who should be liable for the loss the car?
18. Juan deposited a radio-phonograph set with Peter. Can Peter use the
thing deposited?
2
Yes, he can use it in order to preserve the thing so as to
function properly
19. What happens when the depositary has permission to make use of
the thing deposited?
21. Pitoy deposited money, consisting of coins of legal tender, with Mr.
Money. Subsequently, Pitoy authorized Mr. Money to use and
dispose the same. The agreement thus entered between the
depositor and the depositary is:
A contract of loan
23. It is damages granted by the court in order that a right of the plaintiff,
which has been violated or invaded by the defendant, may be
vindicated or recognized, and not for the purpose of indemnifying the
plaintiff for any loss suffered by him.
nominal damages
24. This is secret bidding by or on behalf of the seller by persons who are
not themselves bound by their bids, the purpose simply is to inflate
the price of the goods sold which is fraud upon the purchase of the
goods.
26. Suppose in the problem above, the P10,000 had been placed in a
box, properly sealed, marked and identified as A’s property, and such
box was found in the vaults of the Bank, would that make any
difference in your answer?
27. Mario borrowed P3Million from Philippine National Bank (PNB) and
to secure the same he constituted a chattel mortgage over his vehicle
in favor of PNB. When the debt became due and demandable Mario
3
failed to pay the loan. PNB soon thereafter caused the extrajudicial
foreclosure of the vehicle through a private sale. Is the private sale of
the property mortgaged proper?
Yes, a guarantor can recover from the debtor what the former had
to pay the creditor, even if the guaranty was against the debtor's
will.
a. The debtor’s heir who has paid a part of the debt cannot ask
for the proportionate extinguishment of the antichresis as long
as the debt is not completely satisfied.
b. The creditor’s heir who received his share of the debt cannot
ask for the extinguishment of the antichresis, to the prejudice
of the other heirs who have not been paid.
c. An antichresis is indivisible, even though the debt may be
divided among the successors in interest of the debtor or of
the creditor.
d. All of the above
4
35. The doctrine of “Avoidable Consequences” means:
37. A final judgment for the payment of a time deposit in a savings bank,
which judgment was obtained after the bank had been declared
insolvent, is
38. Under Article 2242 of the Civil Code enumerating the claims or liens
preferred with respect to specific immovable properties, the order of
enumeration means:
39. The credits to which the Civil Code gives preference are:
43. The liability of operators and drivers of colliding vehicles – the bus
company, its driver, the operator of the other vehicle and the driver of
the vehicle – where both drivers were negligent thereby causing
damage to passengers of one of the vehicles in the collision, where a
case for damages was filed, is:
The liability of the bus operators and the drivers involved is joint
and several.
Where it is proven that the carrier was guilty of fraud and bad
faith, even if death does not result.
5
45. Where earning capacity is plainly established but no evidence was
presented to support the allegation of the injured party’s actual
income. The court:
Not only the value of the loss suffers also called “damnum
emergens” but also the profits which the oblige failed to obtain
which is also called “lucrum cessans”;
47. In case of death in crimes and quasi-delict, the following may recover
moral damages:
PART II
FALSE.
An oral contract of guaranty, being a special promise to
answer for the debt of another, is unenforceable unless in
writing.
FALSE
No proof of pecuniary loss is necessary in order that moral,
nominal, temperate, liquidated or exemplary damages, may
be adjudicated. The assessment of such damages, except
liquidated ones, is left to the discretion of the court,
according to the circumstances of each case.
6
FALSE.
The chattel mortgage over a residential house constructed
on a rented land belonging to another person, may be valid
and enforceable, or not. If between only the contracting
parties, mortgagor and mortgagee, the chattel mortgage of
said building is valid and enforceable, since the building,
though a real property, has been considered a chattel
between the parties, and the validity of the contract between
them has been recognized principally upon the principle of
estoppels. However, with respect to third persons, who are
not parties to said contract of chattel mortgage, the building
is an immovable property, and the chattel mortgage on the
same is, to said third persons, a complete nullity.
6. A suit for the recovery of the deficiency, after the foreclosure of a real
estate mortgage, prescribes in ten (10) years. - TRUE
FALSE.
It is not essential to the contract of antichresis that the loan that it
guarantees should have interest.
10. The consent of both the mortgagor and the mortgagee is necessary
in order to cause the registration of the mortgage with the Register of
Deeds.
11. To secure a loan obtained from a rural bank, Purita assigned her
leasehold rights over a stall in the public market in favor of the bank.
The deed of assignment provides that in case of default in the
payment of the loan, the bank shall have the right to sell Purita’s
rights over the market stall as her attorney-in-fact, and to apply the
proceeds to the payment of the loan. The assignment of lease hold
rights over the stall was in fact a mortgage, and not a cession since
there was no transfer of ownership to the bank over the stall.
TRUE
7
X has one (1) year within which to redeem the property. After the
foreclosure, X filed an action questioning the validity of the extra-
judicial foreclosure sale. The 1-year period to redeem the property
will not be interrupted by the filing of the action. - TRUE
14. In a contract of pledge the right of redemption does not exist. Since
there is no right to redeem personal property, the rights of ownership
vested unto the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. - TRUE
FALSE.
It is a special kind of deposit since the primary function is still the
safekeeping of funds, documents, and other objects. The renting out
of the safety deposit boxes is not independent from but related to the
function of safekeeping.
21. Ricardo was employed as sweeper of a school for two (2) hours
every day as a working scholar in exchange for the privilege to study
free of charge. On October 20, 2017, he drove a jeep belonging to
the school and hit a pedestrian causing injuries to him. He was
charged criminally and thereafter convicted. A suit for damages was
filed against the school and Ricardo. The school was held liable as
employer of Ricardo under 2180 of the Civil Code or by reason of the
schools imputed liability/vicarious liability as employer of Ricardo. -
TRUE
22. The Right of Redemption is the right of the mortgagor, after the
foreclosure sale of the mortgaged property, to redeem the property
by paying to the purchaser in the sale or for him to the sheriff who
made the sale, the amount paid by the purchaser, with interest, within
one (1) year from registration of the certificate of sale with the
Register of Deeds. - TRUE
8
9