Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Colors:
Stephen
Caroline
Ricardo
nate
Kenneth
Porsch
Owen
Teresa
Lorna
Quiz 1
Unit 1: Psychology’s History and Approaches (Pg. pre 1-1)
What sorts of common and uncommon questions do psychologists ask and answer?
Examples:
● To what extent do genes predispose our person-to-person differences in personality? To what extent do
home and community environments shape us?
● In what ways are we alike as members of the human family? How do we differ?
● How often, and why, do we dream?
● What do babies actually perceive and think?
● Are some people just born smarter? And does sheer intelligence explain why some people get richer,
think more creatively, or relate more sensitively?
Buddha (India) - pondered how sensations and perceptions combine to form ideas.
Confucius (China) - stressed the power of ideas and of an educated mind.
Socrates and Plato (Greece) - concluded that the mind is separable from body and continues after the body dies,
and that the knowledge is born within us.
Aristotle (Greece) - said knowledge is not preexisting, instead it grows from the experiences stored in our
memories.
Descartes (France) - believed Socrates and Plato, concluded from his animal dissections that the fluid in the
brain’s cavities contained “animal spirits”, explained that they flowed from the brain through nerves (which he
thought were hollow) to the muscles, provoking wwmovement.
Bacon (Britain) - believed the human understanding from its peculiar nature maintains better orders and equality
in things than it really finds, also believed superstition was followed by wayward people who only focused on
when it was right rather than when superstition was incorrect.
Locke (Britain) - argued that the mind is a blank slate on which experience writes.
Empiricism - the view that knowledge originates in experience and that science should, therefore, rely on
observation and experimentation
^ This view helps us turn our thoughts, actions, and feelings of experiences (observations) into knowledge
1
Psychological Science is Born (Pg. 3)
What was the first psychological experiment and who performed it? What conclusion was drawn?
Wilhelm Wundt and two other young men created a machine that measured the time lag between people’s hearing
a ball hit a platform and their pressing a telegraph key. People responded in about one-tenth of a second when
asked to press the key as soon as the sound occurred - and in about two-tenths of a second when asked to press
the key as soon as they were consciously aware of perceiving the sound.
Perfect
Edward Bradford Titchener was Wundt’s student who used structuralism (an early school of thought promoted by
Wundt and Titchener; used introspection to reveal the structure of human mind) by engaging people in
self-reflective introspection, training them to report elements of their experience as they looked at a rose, listened
to a metronome, smelled a scent, or tasted a substance (i.e immediate sensations, images and feelings). It was
2
ultimately unsuccessful because it required smart and verbal people AND it was unreliable because the results
varied from person to person (experience to experience). On top of all that, we just don’t know why we feel why
we feel or do what we do.
William James’s assumption that thinking (like smelling), developed because it was adaptive and contributed to
our ancestor’s survival as well as his belief that consciousness served as an function, tied along with Darwin’s
theories which James was under the influence of helped kickstart and allow functionalism (early school of
thought promoted by James and influenced by Darwin; explored how mental and behavioral processes function -
how they enable the organism to adapt, survive, and flourish) to branch out.
James not only contributed his teachings at Harvard, but also his writings to the initial academic pursuit of
psychology. Mary Calkins, the only girl in James’s seminar, scored higher than all the male students who dropped
out upon her arrival for a Harvard Ph.D. (even though the school denied her the degree she had earned) and
became the first female APA president in 1905. Margaret Floy Washburn, however, did receive the Ph.D from
Harvard, and became the first female to get one in psychology. She also wrote a book and became the second
female APA president in 1921.
Interdisciplinary studies such as cognitive neuroscience helped us further our study and understanding of brain
activity underlying mental activity. This study has given us new and progressive ways of looking at psychology
and the behavior behind actions. More groups, such as behaviorist and humanistic psychologists helped globalize
the nature of psychology by expanding the barriers of its limitations. These groups helped people recognize more
of the possibilities - especially regarding how people act from their subconscious desires, consequence
association, and environments.
Psychology is a study of behavior and mental process because it not only researches what organisms do, and their
physical actions, but also what they think, and how their train of thought leads them to said action. It’s a science
because it’s less of a set group of findings and more of a set of questions with unsure answers,
The issue, or debate is a century-long struggle between Plato - considering that we are born with knowledge, and
some is learned from the environment - and Aristotle countering that we know nothing from birth, that everything
is taught from our existence and our senses. This issue is dissolved by simple reasoning: Nuture works on what
3
nature endures. We are exceptionally smart beings, and we have the ability to adapt to the world around us with
ease. It’s not a debate, more as an argument of two sides which go hand in hand.
Nature-nurture issue - the longstanding controversy over the relative contributions that genes and experience
make to the development of psychological traits and behaviors. [That goes way back to the ancient Greeks].
Today’s science sees traits and behaviors arising from the interaction of nature to nurture.
The biopsychosocial approach analyzes how biological, psychological, and social-cultural factors fit into the
actions of a human being.
Behavioral is how we learn observable responses - such as what we should or should not fear.
Biological is how the body and brain work together to deliver emotions, sensory responses, and our gene makeup
- how we know what pain is, why some people are prone to depression.
Evolutionary is how natural selection has promoted the survival of specific traits or genes - behavior tendencies.
Humanistic is how we meet our needs for love, acceptance, and self-fullfillment - how we can fulfill our
potential, or overcome barriers in our own life.
Psychodynamic is how our behavior springs from unconscious drives or conflicts - how someone’s personality
can be explained with unfulfilled wishes or childhood trauma.
Social-cultural is how our behavior varies across situations and culture - how races differ, how we’re alike our
family.
Levels of analysis - the differing complementary views, from biological to psychological to social-cultural, for
analyzing any given phenomenon.
Biopsychosocial approach - an integrated approach that incorporates biological, psychological, and social-cultural
levels of analysis
4
Psychology’s Subfields (Pg. 13)
What sorts of basic and/or applied research is conducted by the following psychologists: biological,
developmental, cognitive, educational, personality, social, human factors and industrial/organizational? What is
the difference between clinical psychologists and psychiatrists? What is positive and community psychology?
How has psychology connected with other disciplines as well as influenced modern culture?
5
C. Positive v. Community Psychology
a. Positive Psychology scientifically explores positive emotions, positive character traits, and
enabling institutions. [What can psychology contribute to a “good life” that engages one’s skills,
and a “meaningful” life that points beyond oneself?]
b. Community Psychology works to create social and physical environments that are healthy for all.
D. Psychologists teach in medical schools, law schools, and high schools, and they work in hospitals,
factories, and corporate offices. They engage in interdisciplinary studies such as psychohistory and
psychoceramics. Psychology influences modern culture (because knowledge transforms us) in that its
findings changes people, people are less likely to judge psychological disorders as moral failings or treat
women as men’s mental inferiors. [Knowledge has modified attitudes, and, through them, behavior.]
Forensic Psychologist - apply psychological principles to legal issues. They conduct research on the interface of
law and psychology, help to create public policies related to mental health, help law-enforcement agencies in
criminal investigations, or consult on jury selection and deliberation processes. They also provide assessment to
assist the legal community.
Health Psychologist - researchers and practitioners who are concerned with psychology’s contribution to
promoting health and preventing disease. They may help individuals lead a healthier life by designing,
conducting, and evaluating programs to helps individuals. In public service, health psychologists study and work
to improve government policies and health care systems.
Industrial-Organizational (I/O) Psychologist - study the relationship between people and their working
environments. They may develop new ways to increase productivity, improve personnel selection, or promote job
satisfaction in an organizational setting. Their interest include organizational structure and change, consumer
behavior, and personnel selection and training.
Clinical psychologists work with psychological health for individuals, groups, and organizations. Engage
in research, teaching, assessment, and consultation(may hold workshops and lectures). They work in a variety of
settings like private practice, mental health service organizations, schools, universities, industries, legal systems,
medical systems, counseling centers, government agencies, and military services. You need a doctorate from a
clinical psychology program to become one. Some specialize in specific disorders and others treat a range of
them.(Deal with more serious issues) (All around for the most part)
Community Psychologists focus on specific individuals/families to deal with more broad mental health
issues. They believe behavior is influenced mostly by the environment(physical, social, political, and economic).
Help in preventive measures and crisis intervention and pay more attention to underserved groups and ethnic
minorities. Some work with public health professionals. They work at federal, state, and local departments of
mental health, corrections, and welfare.
Counseling psychologists help people going through life transitions/lifestyle changes. They conduct
therapy and provide assessments to individuals/groups. Emphasize on clients’ strengths, helping them utilize own
skills, interests, and abilities to cope through changes. They work in academy settings, university counseling
centers, community mental health centers, businesses, and private practices.
They believe that their intuition is more than enough as a guide. However, our intuition can often lead us
astray as we tend to overestimate are intuition or fool ourselves. The Three phenomena of hindsight bias,
judgmental overconfidence, and our tendency to perceive patterns in random events show why we can’t solely
rely on intuition.
Did We Know It All Along? The Hindsight Bias (Pg. 31) Ricardo
How does hindsight make after the fact occurrences seem obvious? How do psychologists use the hindsight bias
to demonstrate how two opposing ideas can seem like “common sense?” What are some examples of how casual
observations that seem obvious, have it wrong?
Hindsight bias makes it seem obvious because it is the tendency to believe, after learning the outcome, that one
would have foreseen it. They use hindsight bias by telling both groups of people with opposing ideas that their
idea has been proven to be true. After being told that is proven to be true, it becomes easier to accept and seem as
“common sense”. Some examples are that familiarity breeds contempt, dreams predict the future, and that most of
us only use 10 percent of our brain.
Goranson: asked people to unscramble three anagrams, and the average problem solver spends three minutes on it
(but with us, already seeing the answer, our confident hindsight might estimate 10 seconds).
Tetlock: collected ~27,000 expert predictions of world events, such as the future of South Africa or whether
Quebec would separate from Canada. His repeated finding: These predictions, which experts made with 80
percent confidence on average, were right less than 40 percent of the time.
7
These studies demonstrate that we humans tend to think we know more than we do, and we can only find out
what we didn’t know in the past by continuing our research (and in psychological terms, the more we research,
the better we’ll know about how we function).
The Scientific Attitude: Curious, Skeptical, and Humble (Pg. 34) Stephen
What are some examples of where psychologists demonstrate the ability to be “skeptical but not cynical, open but
not gullible?”
Some examples of where psychologists demonstrate the ability to have curious skepticism is when they
persistently ask two questions: “What do you mean? How do you know?”
Or rather asking other questions like: Do parental behaviors determine children’s sexual orientation? Can
astrologers predict your future based on the position of the planets at your birth? Is electroconvulsive therapy an
effective treatment for severe depression? As we will see, putting such claims to the test has led psychological
scientists to answer No to the first two and Yes to the third.
Critical thinking examines assumptions, assess the source, discerns hidden values, confirms evidence, and
assesses conclusions. It asks that questions and comes up with a reasonable solution. Not blind guessing, but
logical conclusions.
For example, most people don’t suffer from unrealistically low self esteem, and high self esteem isn’t always
great. Opposites don’t usually attract, etc. Beliefs like these have been debunked using critical thinking.
An observation is a discovery of the world around you, and a theory is trying to explain said observation. So for
example: The trees are green. (Observation). The trees are green because of a chemical in the leaves. (Theory)
A hypothesis is an educated guess on an outcome. It helps gives your experiment a direction, something you can
test.
An operational definition
8
which may contradict the results of several other cases of the same situation, and as humans we are subject to bias
due to being attracted to what is much more memorable.
Naturalistic Observation - observing and recording behavior in naturally occurring situations without trying to
manipulate and control the situation
Case Study - A descriptive technique in which one individual or group is studied in depth in the hope of revealing
universal principles.
Naturalistic observations have revealed that animals aren’t as much different from humans than we perceive them
to be, and also have found patterns in human behaviors.
Quiz 2
The Survey (Pg. 42) nate
How are surveys defined? What are some examples of data that has been discerned through surveys?
A survey looks at many cases in less depth. Surveys are done when researchers want to estimate, from a
representative sample of people, the attitude or reported behaviors of a whole population. Some data that has been
discerne from surveys include:
- half of all americans reported experience ing more happiness and enjoyment than stress and worry on the
previous day. (Gallup, 2010)
- Online Canadians reported using new forms of electronic communication and thus receiving 35% fewer
emails in 2010 than 2008 (Ipsos, 2010a).
- 1 in 5 people across 22 countries reported believing that alien beings have come to Earth and now walk
among us as humans (Ipsos, 2010b).
- 68% percent of all humans— some 4.6 billion people— say that religion is important in their daily lives.
(Dinner eat al, 2011).
Wording Effects (Pg. 42)
What are some examples of how framing can impact survey results? Why is it important for psychologists to
consider this phenomenon? nate
People are much more approving of “aid to the needy” than of “welfare” of “affirmative action” than of
“preferential treatment”, of “not allowing” televised cigarette ads than of “censoring” them, and of “revenue
enhancers” instead of “taxes”. basically people don’t like big scary words so use nicer sounding ones instead. In
2009 ¾ americans were in favor of giving people “a choice” for a public, government-run, or private health care
insurance. Yet in another survey they were against “creating a public health care plan administered by the federal
government that would compete directly with private health care companies. Because wording is such a delicate
matter, critical thinkers will reflect on how the phrasing of a questions might affect people's expressed opinions.
Population - all those in a group being studied, from which samples may be drawn (Note: Except for national
studies, this does not refer to a country’s whole population.)
● You could seek a representative sample by finding a random sample (a sample that fairly represents a
population because each member has an equal chance of inclusion) within a large population..
Representative sample - a small sample meant to represent a bigger whole (usually referring to people).
● Pollsters and scientists use a random amount (usually of a fractional size) of sampled people from all
areas of a country to provide an accurate snapshot of the nation’s opinions.
Positive correlation - if two sets of scores tend to rise and fall together.
Negative correlation - if two sets of scores relate inversely to each other.
To say that variables are NOT correlated is to say that neither score relate to each other in any way, the data is
random and has no apparent pattern.
Correlations are important for psychological research because sometimes to see what is right in front of them,
they need statistical information (so they don’t miss anything).
● Assuming low self esteem causes depression because how self esteem correlates negatively with
depression (there can be people with low self esteem who don’t deal with depression)
10
● The more teens felt loved by their parents, the less likely they were to behave in healthy ways (teens have
different perceptions of what their parents do, so there could be a teen whose parents loved them to death
- but because they didn’t recognize that love, they stepped out of bounds - survey is flawed).
● Assuming an object has a home where you are and doesn’t move just because every time you enter the so
called “home”, it is also there. (Someone could’ve moved it and put it back in the same spot before you
returned).
It’s important to understand that correlation does not always mean causation (especially in this day in age)
because many studies/surveys can be published claiming causation between two factors that have a coincidental
correlation, but are definitely not related in that way. “Don’t believe everything you hear.”
By taking each value, finding its deviation from the mean, squaring each, adding them all, diving them all by the
number of scores, and finally square rooting the result you are able to find the Standard Deviation of a data set. A
smaller standard deviation means the values are closer to each other while a larger standard deviation means they
are more spread. If a value upsets the mean because there is a huge difference between them, the standard
deviation can expose that. (Pic in mid of 58)
Most data, when graphed by mean, is similar to the normal curve or the “bell curve.” The bell curve has 68% of
its data fall within 1 standard deviation of the mean, 95% fall within 2 standard deviations, and 98.8 fall within 3.
This helps us understand averages because the mean is the center of this typical spread of data and if the mean is
skewed it is usually because it is not a bell curve. (chart on bottom of pg 59)
K
Tbh tho why is stats in psych … umumumumum
Samples that are statistically significant are not always practically significant as well. While a result with
statistical significance means the result likely did not happen by chance, it does not necessarily mean that the
result contains any importance to the world, or is practically significant.
Some reasons are because a laboratory experiment lets psychologists recreate psychological forces under
controlled conditions.an experiments purpose is not to recreate the exact behaviors of everyday life but to test
theoretical principles. When psychologist apply laboratory research on aggression to actual violence, they are
applying theoretical principles of aggressive behavior, principles they have refined through many experiments.
Similarly, it is the principles of visual system, developed from experiments in artificial settings, that researchers
apply to more complex behaviors. And many investigations show that principles derived in the laboratory do
typically generalize to the everyday world. Psychological science focuses less on particular behavior than on
seeking general principles that help explain behaviors.
Does Behavior Depend on One’s Culture and Gender? (Pg. 65) Ricardo
What are some examples that demonstrate that human behavior is defined both by being members of a larger
human family as well as of a cultural group? What are some examples that demonstrate that gender differences in
behavior and attitude are both pronounced and highly exaggerated?
Culture is the enduring behaviors, ideas, attitudes, values, and traditions shared by a group or people and
transmitted from one generation to the next. Culture influences our standards of promptness and frankness, our
attitudes toward premarital sex and varying body shapes, our tendency to be casual or formal, our willingness to
make eye contact, our conversational distance and much more.
Researchers report that gender diversity differences in what we dream, in how we express and detect emotions,
and in our risk for alcohol use disorder, depression, and eating disorders. Psychologically as well as biologically,
women and men are overwhelmingly similar. Whether female or male, we learn to walk at about the same age.
We experience the same sensations of light and sound. We feel pangs of hunger, desire, and fear. We exhibit
similar overall intelligence and well-being.
Why Do Psychologists Study Animals and Is It Ethical to Experiment on Animals? (Pg. 66) Stephen
Why and to what extent can humans benefit and learn from studying animals? What moral and ethical arguments
do researchers use to demonstrate that it is important to experiment on animals? What precautions have been
taken to ensure the safety and comfort of animals being experimented upon?
13
People study animals because they’re fascinating in how they learn, think, and behave. Humans that study
animals can benefit in learning more about themselves because (to some extent) we ARE animals (and most of
our DNA is similar; ex: diseases and organ, and how we process info).
Some researchers argue that the argument isn’t about good pinned against evil, but their compassion for animals
versus compassion for people. We spare more humans by experimenting on animals, even though some animals
have to get lost in the process. We also wear clothes and make other animals suffer already, so it might not be all
animals BUT we only value those who we perceive as close to us.
Precautions: Some animal protection organizations want to replace experiments on dogs with naturalistic
experimentation. Many people support government regulations protecting primates, dogs, and cats - some
regulations even providing humane care for rats and mise. APA guidelines state that researchers must ensure the
“comfort, health, and humane treatment” of animals and minimize “infection, illness, and pain” (APA 2002).
Researchers do temporarily stress or deceive people, but only when they believe it is essential to a justifiable end,
such as understanding and controlling violent behavior or studying mood swings. Some experiments not work if
participants know everything beforehand.
Four Principles:
1. Obtain potential participants’ informed consent (an ethical principle that research participants be told
enough to enable them to choose whether they wish to participate).
2. Protect them from physical or emotional harm and discomfort
3. Keep information about the individual participants confidential
4. Fully debrief (the postexperimental explanation of a study, including its purpose and any deceptions, to its
participant) people and explain the research afterwards.
14
Advanced Placement Psychology: Unit One People Guide
History, Perspectives and Research Methods
Name Contribution
Mary ● scored higher than all the male students who dropped out upon her arrival for a
Whiton Calkins Harvard Ph.D. (even though the school denied her the degree she had earned)
● became the first female APA president in 1905
John ● argued that the mind is a blank slate on which experience writes.
Locke
15
Margaret ● received the Ph.D from Harvard, the first female to get one in psychology
Floy Washburn ● wrote a book
● second female APA president (1921)
16