Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
l l . Number 4, 1991
284
cosa.^^'" Donn^' demonstrated thot Following administratian of local The gingival graft material wos
the kerotinizotian of the epithelium is anesthesia, a horizontal sharp dis- then shaped to correspond to the
directed by the underlying connective section was performed at the mu- donor site and placed in position.
tissue layer. The claim that the free cogingival [unction to separóte the Two coronal marginal sutures were
gingival graft is more predictable alveolar mucosa, elastic, and muscle placed to stabilize the graft. A cir-
thon the connective tissue autograft fibers from the underlying periosteum. cumferential suture was inserted into
in increasing the zone of attached Any remaining muscle fibers and the periosteal bed slightly opical to
gingiva, from a cytologie point of movable connective tissues were re- the inferior margin of the graft,
view, was not studied. moved, and every effort was made looped around the cervical area of
The object of the present investi- to afford on immobile periosteal bed. the tooth, and tied to compress the
gation was to evoluate, by means of Laterally, the initiol incision was made graff against the recipient bed. The
scanning electron microscopy, the ul- slightly coronal to the mucogingival graft wos firmly compressed with a
trastructuraf modifications that occur junction, to "overlap" the gingival moist gauze for two minutes and then
with the placement of epithelium- groft onto the attached gingiva co- dressed with Coe-Pock periodontai
connective tissue grafts, and connec- ronal to the mucagingivai junction. dressing (Coe Laborotories, Inc),
tive tissue grafts. After preparation of the recipient The ultra structura I ona lysis wos
site, measurements were taken with a conducted on 40 autogenous free
Michigan 0 periodontai probe to de- human graft biopsy specimens of tis-
Method and materials
termine the exact dimensions of the sues ¡all less than 1 mm^), taken 30
The present study utilized two differ- free graft materai to be secured from days posto peratively with a punch
ent types of grafts; one composed the hard palate. Masticatory mucoso forceps [Aesculap OK 507). These
of epithelium and connective tissue of the gingival zone of the hord pal- specimens were fixed immediately in
and the ather mode only of connec- ate was used as donor tissue. The 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M caca-
tive tissue. Forty areas in 28 patients, outline of the gingivoi graft was dylate buffer (pH 7.3) followed by
aged 20 to 48, were treated at the scribed with o sharp scalpel. The do- postfixotion in 2% osmium tetroxide
Clinica Odontoiotrica of the Univer- nor graft, composed of epithelium buffered v/ith 0.1 M cocodylate (pfH
sity of Ferrara, Italy, through the and connective tissue, was then dis- 7,3), Tissues were then dehydrated in
plocement of free gingival grafts. sected from the palate ¡Figs 1 to 3). increasing concentrations of ethonol,
Twenty free gingivoi grafts, consisting To procure the "connective tissue- and embedded in epoxy resin. Semi-
of both epithelium and connective tis- only" graft, the mucosal flap was thin sections, 1 mm thick, were
sue and 20 grafts mode up only of partiolly elevated from the hard pal- stained with toluidine blue and ex-
connective tissue, were ploced. ate and only the connective tissue amined vio light microscopy.
was removed and utilized os donor
Orol hygiene instructions were giv- Ultrothin sections with interference
tissue (Figs 4 to 9), The epithelium
en to the patients to ensure excellent colours in the silver ronge ¡approxi-
was then replaced and sutured se-
preoperotive and postoperative mately 700 Â) were cut in Reichert
curely.
plaque control in conjunction with microtomes with glass knives. They
scaling and polishing procedures. were mounted on copper grids,
This regimen was repeated once a stained with uronyl acetate and lead
week for o period of 2 weeks. citrate, and examined with a scan-
ning electron microscope (Zeiss EM-
9S2), Samples of attached gingiva
and hard palote, prepared for the
scanning electron microscope by the
same procedure, served as controls.
f CT
E
\
i / ^
Fig I The palatal components: (Bl Fig 2 Reflection of the partiol thickness epithelialized graft epithelium as the outer sur-
bone; (CTj connective tissue; ¡E) epithe- face of the flap. The incisions are located at a safe distance from the free gingival
lium. margin to prevent recession in the approximating area.
Figs 4 ta 9 Schematic representation oí Fig 4 The palatal components: ¡B) Fig 5 Incision ond thin palatal flop
Ihe free gingival gran (wilhou! epithelium) bone. ¡CT) connective iissue; ¡El epithe- reflected, leaving underlying connective
procedure- lium. tissue.
figs 8 and 9 Flap is sutured to palate. This procedure will facilitate the healing af the donor tissue ¡heoling by primory intentian).
Results epithelium ridges that surrounded the basal lamina, wos irregulor be-
fingerlike connective tissue papillae in cause of numerous short projections
Attached gingiva which capillaries were abundant. All that extended into the underlying
Under the light microscope, the ot- of this is in o g ree ment with the results connective tissue, causing the for-
toched gingivo appeared to be com- of previous studies.^''"^'' matian of introflections, in which the
posed of epithelium and lamina pro- Scanning electron microscopic basal lomina were found (Fig 10],
analysis showed that the oral epithe- Desmosomes joined adjacent epi-
priQ, the lotter in close and direct re-
lium wos subdivided into the char- thelial cells.
lationship with the periosteum, A
clearly delineated submucosa was octeristic four loyers of cells: basal,
obsent. The lining epithelium was a spinous, granular, and cornified. The
kerotiniztng stratified squomous epi- basal loyer wos made up of either
cylindrical or cuboidal cells, in a
thelium, while the lamina propria, with
single layer, immediately adjacent to
na glands, was made of dense fi-
the connective tissue from which they
brous connective tissue, with only a
were seporoted by o basal lomina.
few elastic fibers. The bosement
The cytoplosm contained differently
membrane, which separotes the ep-
oriented bundles of microfilaments.
ithelium ond connective tissue, was
The cellular surface, in proximity to
uneven and characterized by deep
Fig 19 Lamina propria of the mucosa of ths hard palote at the donor site. Large bun-
dles of coltogen fibers ore rondamly oriented, ¡cfj Collogen fibers. lOriqinol moanifica-
tian x24.000.¡
Epithelium—connecfive tissue
autograft
• I I , Number-S, 1991
296
filaments that were frequently aggre- Discussion and conclusions Both human ond animal studies
gated in bundles (Fig 28). have previously reported degenera-
The stratum comeum was com- Numerous clinical studies have tive epithelial alterations of the graft
posed of flattened, onucleor cells, shown a definitive biologic attach- during the first week.'^'-*^ Histoiogic
whose cytoplasm was filled almost ment and blending of the free gin- studies have also reported a migra-
exclusively by microfilaments running giva autogrofl inio the surrounding tion of epithelial cells from adjacent
parallel to the long axes of the cells periodontal tissues,^'"'^^'^' Attach- wound margins between the second
1F¡9 29). ment of the groft materiol is accom- and the fourth days."'"'" Oliver et
The underlying connective tissue plished by day 10 to 13.'^ al'^ and Lange and Bernimaulin'^
consisted of coarse collagen fibers Light microscopic studies hove mentioned a possible participation of
frequently aggregated in intermin- clorified the healing mechanisms, in- basal cells that remain in the graft in
gling bundles. Immediately below the cluding the cellular changes and vos- re-epithelia!ization.
epithelium, the collogen fibers be- cular development of the free gingi- The presence of nonvital ar un-
come thinner, forming a band to val graft placed in the donor healthy spinaus cells in the speci-
which the cellular projections of the area."-'^''^ mens we examined could signify on
basal layer were anchored (see Fig The ultra structura I observations via incomplete maturation of the epithe-
26). The prime cellular constituents of scanning electron microscope have lium, because of a compromise of
the connective tissue were the fibro- dealt with numerous aspects of the nutritional supply from the blood ves-
blasts, which showed evidence of dentogingival interface of healthy hu- sels of the lamina propria. This hy-
active production. man gingiva ond the normal human pothesis was reinforced by the fact
NumeroLiS capillaries with either periodontium.^"'^^ LJsing the transmis- that the endothelial cells of the cap-
distended ¡Fig 30) or collapsed walls sion electron microscope, Listgarten^^ illories interspersed throughout the
were observed (Fig 31). The long, examined the gingival graft in mon- bundles af collagen fibers in the graft
flattened endothelial cells were par- keys. demonstrated ultra structura I charoc-
allel to the long axes of the vessels. However, an ultra structura I study teristics of degeneration (ie, absence
Tight [unctions were present belween of free gingival epithelium-connec- of cellular organelles, vacuolization
adjacent endothelial cells. The cyto- tive tissue ond connective tissue grafts of the cytoplasm, pyknotic nuclei).
plasm was filled with microfiloments in humans has not been presented Thus, the histoiogic alterations of the
and vescicles of micropinocytosis. before. Ultra structura I obsen/ctions of epithelium were a consequence of in-
The tuminal surfaces of the endo- epithelium-connective tissue grafts, ten-uption of the nutrient supply to the
thelial cells were smooth in some taken 30 days posto peratively, led to grafted material, whose survival must
areas, while, in other regions, folding the conclusion that the lining epithe- initially depend on tissues of the sur-
had resulted in crypt formotion. The lium was composed of four cellular rounding areas for nutrition.
external surfaces were lined with a layers: basol, spinous, granular, and Examination of the connective tis-
continuous basal membrane. cornified. Such cells presented a sue-only graft, 30 days postopera-
morphologic picture resembling the tively, revealed an epithelium similar
cells of the lining epithelium of the to that of both the control and the
attached gingiva and the mucosa of epithelium-connective tissue graft.
the hord palate in the donor site, with
the exception of the spinous cell
layer. Here the trouma and degen-
eration were evidenced by vocuolo-
zation of the cytoplasm, the absence
of cellular organelles, a reduced
number of desmosomes, and nar-
rower intercellular spaces.
16. Kamng T, et al: Conservation of tissue 31. Loe H, Korring T: The three dimensional
specificity after heteroscopic transplan- morphology of the epithelium connec-
tation of gingiva and alveolar mucosa. tive tissue interface of the gingiva os
J Periodont Res 1971 ;ó.282. related to age and sex. Scanij J Den!
17. Ccffesse RG, et al: Free gingival grafts Res 1972;79:3t5.
in dogs, A clinical and histologicol 32. Svejdo J, Skach M: The periodontium
study, J Dent Res 1971 ;50:1160 ot the humon tooth in the scanning
(abstr), electron microscope J Periodontol
18. Gargiulo A, Arrocha R: Histo-chemical 1973;44:478.
evaluation of free gingival grafts, Pen- 33. Listgarten MA: Electron microscope
odoniics 1967;5:2fe, study of the junción between surgicolly
19. Gordon HP, et ah Free autogenous denuded roof surfaces and regener-
gingival grafts, II, Supplemental find- ated periodontal tissues. J Periadont
ings on histology of the groft site. Peri- Res 1972;7:68.
odontics 19ó8;ó.l30, 34. Listgarten MA: The ultra structure of hu-
20. Catfesse RG, et al: Healing of free gin- man gingival epithelium. Am J Anat
gival grafts with and wifriout perios- 1964;n4:49,
teum. I, Histologie evaluation, J Peri- 35. Listgarten MA: Normal development.
odofjto/1979,50:586. Structure, physiology and repair of gin-
gival epithelium. Ora/5oi?ei/1972;l:3,
21. Soehren SE, et al: Clinical and histo-
logicol studies of donor tissues utilized 36. Schroeder HE, Theilade J: Electron mi-
for free grafts of masticatory mucosa. croscopy of nomial human gingival
J Periodontol 1973;44:727. epithelium, J Periodont Res 19ó6;l:95.
22. Lange DE, Bernimoulin JP: Exfoliotive
cytoTogical studies in evaluation of free
gingival graft healing, J Clin Periodon-
to/1974; 1:89
23. Kaning T, et al: The origin of granu-
latian tissue and its impoct on post-
operative results of mucagingival sur-
gery. J Periodontan975;46:S77.
24. Botero A, Ruben MP, Kramer G M :
Connedive tissue grofts, induction of
farmaion of gingiva in mucosal recep-
tor sites J Periodonton975;] 0:360.
25. Stambaugh RV, Gordon HP: Connec-
tive Issue influence on mucosal tero-
tinkatian. J Dent Res 1973;52:147
(abstr No. 355|.
26. Broome WC, Taggart E: Free auto-
genous connective tissue grafting. J
Periodonton976-A7:580.
27. Donn BJ: The free connective Issue
autogroft: a clinical and histologie
wound healing study in humans. J Peri-
odonlol 1978;'19:253.
28. Hawley CE, Stoffileno H: Clinical eval-
uation of free gingivol grafts in peri-
odontal surgery. J Periodontot
197O;41:IO5,
29. 6racl<ett RC, Gargiulo AW: Free gin-
gival grafts in humans. J Periodontol
1970;4l:58l.
30. Boyde A: The contribution of the scan-
ning electron microscope, T Dentol
Hisiology, Part II. Apex 1970, pp 4, 9,