Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abdul Rafay
Associate Professor
School of Business & Economics,
University of Management & Technolog y, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abstract
Purpose of this paper is to explore the three strategic orientations (customer, competitive, and
technological) of the firm and new product performance. To understand which of three
different strategic orientations is more appropriate, when and why it is so in the context of
developing product innovations. To discuss Pakistani brands and develop prepositions with
reference to the working styles of Pakistani brands. It also discusses the theoretical and
managerial implications for business in Pakistan .
Keywords : Strategic orientation, Market orientation, Propositions, Pakistani brands
1. Introduction
There are three major strategic orientations of the firm that determine the success or failure
of new products: customer, competitive, and technological orientations. According to Narver
and Slater 1990 customer orientation is the firm s complete understanding of its customers so
that the company can be able to create special value for its customers .
In view of Narver and Slater competitor orientation is the ability to respond competitors
actions and technological orientation. In the views of Cooper and Kanter is the R&D
orientation of the firm which means that how active is the firm in adopting new technolog ies
and hi-tech systems with sophis ticated technologies for developing new products .
Interfunctional coordination allows for communication and exchange between the firm's
organizational units that are concerned with the three orientations (Moenaert et al. 1994).
Without interfunctional coordination, the new product development process would be ruled
by a single preoccupation (customer, competitive, or technological), which reduces the
innovation's potential performance . Therefore, interfunctional coordination is the mechanism
that enables the three necessary strategic orientations to work jointly.
2. Strategic Orientation and Successful Innovation
Narver and Slater's (1990) and Slater and Narver's (1994) articles are pioneer studies of the
impact of market orientation on firm performance. Firms that are market- oriented perform
better than the others. An important question, however, which has not been addressed in the
context of innovations, concerns the reasons for this finding; is it because these firms are able
COPY RIGHT © 2011 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 118
3. Business in Pakistan
For the deeper understanding of the business in Pakistan, We would like here to capitalize the
results of Brand Election 2010 by incorporating the election results. The Brand Elections are
built on authentic research data of Consume r Multimedia Index (CMI) which is the first of its
kind and the largest single-source data in Pakistan with a most robust and representative
10,000 sample across 50 cities covering all SECs of Urban Pakistan. The results have been
organized in a few ways to shed a deeper light into the dynamics of these brands. Specifically
these elections have produced the following results:
Being the crème de la crème of the Pakistani marketplace, these Top 10 brands are the ones
that have the strongest hold over the hearts and minds of the Pakistani people. Surf Excel leads
the pack, followed by National Foods at a close second. Glamour brand LUX shines in at
number 3, with Pepsi and Sooper high on their heels at the 4th and 5th position. Nokia,
Dawlance, Super Asia, and Mortein take the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th position while Wall s closes
the top 10 listing.
1 Surf Excel
2 National (Foods)
3 Lux
4 Pepsi
5 Sooper
6 Nokia
7 Dawlance
8 Super Asia
9 Mortien
10 Walls
The individual category results show which brands rule which constituencies .
The results of the Brand Elections 2010 be it for overall Top 100 brands, by gender, by region
or even for the 50+ category constituencies, offers a great insightful gold mine for the
inquisitive mind.
If we look at the Top 100 brands make up vis a vis the category constituency they represent, 27
brands each have emerged from Household food and Personal care categories. This is
followed by 15 brands from Drinks , 9 from Durables , 8 each from Household care and
Impulsive food , and 5 from the Communication category. This in itself paints a bigger
picture for the categories width and depth of presence in consumers hearts and minds on one
end and the strength of the individual brands within each of these categories.
When one takes a deeper look at some of the Top 10 Brands of Pakistan, including the likes of
Surf Excel, Lux, Pepsi, Sooper, Nokia, and Dawlance, trying to decipher and understand what
separates them from the rest of the brands that have managed to find a place in consumer
preferences, the smart marketer can draw some very interesting learning.
Simplicity and clarity of purpose are the key ingredients of these top brands. They are well
chiseled and focused. Strong leadership, strong market orientation, intelligent thinking and
consistent commitment to core equity building more than anything else.
After gaining great insights from the results of Brand Election 2010 Pakistan, as such thirty-
four propositions are suggested for firms in the context of Pakistan .
Referrences
Cooper, Robert G, (1984b), "The Strategy-Performance Link in Product
Innovation;' R&D
Management, 14 (October), 247-59.
Kanter, Rosabe th M. (1988), "When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural,
Collective, and
Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization" in Research in
Organizational
Behavior, Vol 10, B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, eds. Greenwich,
CT. JAI Press,
169-211.
Narver, J.D. and Slater, S.F. (1990), ``The effect of a market
orientation on business
profitability'', Journal of Marketing ,Vol. 5, October, pp. 20-35.
Narver, J.D. and Slater, S.F. (1998), ``Additional thoughts on the
measurement of market
orientation: a comment on Deshpande and Farley'', Journal of
Market-Focused
Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 233-6.
Narver, J.D., Slater, S.F. and Tietje, B. (1998), ``Creating a market
orientation'', Journal of
Market- Focused Management , Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 241-56.