Sie sind auf Seite 1von 23

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/227446117

User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical


Models

Article  in  Management Science · August 1989


DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Source: RePEc

CITATIONS READS
12,302 29,327

3 authors, including:

Fred D. Davis Richard Bagozzi


University of Arkansas University of Michigan
85 PUBLICATIONS   73,022 CITATIONS    340 PUBLICATIONS   75,736 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Reshoring from a demand-side perspective View project

household food waste minimization View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Richard Bagozzi on 01 September 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


User Acceptance Of Computer Technology: A Comparison Of Two
Davis, Fred D.; Bagozzi, Richard P.; Warshaw, Paul R.
Management Science; Aug 1989; 35, 8; ABI/INFORM Global
pg. 982

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
View publication stats