LG001 Csa Cal 026

#REF!
#REF!
Nama Posisi Tanggal Tanda Tangan
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 31
_
Project Name : Main Contractor :
LUWUK GAS ENGINE POWER PLANT 40 MW
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES
REVISION REVISION
SHEET SHEET
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
REVISION SUMMARY
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE

Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents 1
1.0 GENERAL PARAMETER 3

1.1 Scope 3
1.2 Code, Standard, and References 3
1.3 Unit 3
1.4 Quality of Material 3
1.5 Unit Weight of Material 4
1.6 Pile Foundation Capacity 5
1.7 Abbreviation 5
1.8 Design Criteria 6
2.0 DESIGN LOADING 7
2.1 Dead Load 7
2.2 Equipment Load 7
2.3 Wind Load 7
2.4 Earthquake Load 8
3.0 LOADING COMBINATION 9
3.1 Factored Load Combination 9
3.2 Unfactored Load Combination 9
4.0 FOUNDATION GEOMETRY DESIGN 11
4.1 Foundation Plan 11
4.2 Foundation Dimension Design 11
4.3 Pile Arrangement 12
4.4 Loading Data 13
4.5 Loading Resume 16
4.6 Loading Combination Calculation 16
5.0 PILING DESIGN 18
6.0 CONCRETE PILECAP REINFORCEMENT DESIGN 21
6.1 General 21
6.2 Bending Moment for Pilecap Design 21
6.3 Pilecap Flexural Reinforcement (Top &Bottom Reinforcement ) 22
6.4 Check Concrete Shear of Pile 23
6.5 Pilecap Shear Reinforcement 23
6.6 Maximum Crack Width on Tension Area 24
Page 1
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
7.0 ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN 25
8.0 SETTLEMENT CALCULATION 25
9.0 CONCLUSION 26
ATTACHMENT
A. EQUIPMENT PROPERTIES
B. VENDOR DATA
C. CENTER OF GRAVITY CALCULATION
D. TRANSFORMER 34/41 MVA FOUNDATION PLAN, SECTION AND PILING LAYOUT DRAWING
E. SOIL INVESTIGATION
Page 2
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
1. GENERAL PARAMETER
1.1 Scope
This document covers the calculation of Transformer 22/27 MVA Foundation for LUWUK GAS ENGINE POWER
PLANT 40 MW
1.2 Codes, Standards, and References

1. ACI 318-02 "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary".
2. ASCE 7/05 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures".
3. Uniform Building Code (UBC 1997) Vol. 2 "Structural Engineering Design Provisions".
4. Bowles, J. E., "Foundation Analysis and Design: 4th edition", McGraw-Hill,Inc.
5. Mechanical Equipment List
6. O'Neill, Michael W., "Design of Structures and Foundation for Vibrating Machines" Gulf
Publishing Company, 1984
7. Braja M Das, "Principles of Soil Dynamic", PWS-Kent, 1993.
8. Shamser Prakash, "Pile Foundation in Engineering Practice",
9. Soil Investigation Report GEPP 40 MW PROJECT.
1.3 Units
All Units are in SI Unit, Unless Noted Otherwise
1.4 Quality of Material

Symbol Materials Value Unit
Concrete
-
Cement Type I, shall be portland cement conform to
SNI 15 - 2049-2004 or ASTM C150 for Concrete Work
- Aggregate conforming to SII 0052 or ASTM C33
- Water shall be clean potable water and free from

injurious amounts of soils, acids, alkalis, organic and
other deleterious materials.
f'c_s Compression strength for structural concrete 30.0 MPa
f'c_l Compression strength for leveling concrete 14.0 MPa
Reinforcing bar ASTM A615 or JIS G3112 SR 390/40 or SII

0136-84 or SNI 07 - 2052 - 2002 BJTD 40 (deformed) and
BJTP 24 (Plain)
fy Min. yield strength for deformed bar 400.0 MPa
Page 3
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
Anchor Bolts ASTM A307-04 grade C or JIS G 3101 SS 41 or
equivalent (shall be hot dipped galvanized comply to ASTM
A153 M Class C), ASTM A563 Gr A (Nuts), ASTM F436
(washer))
Fy_a Yield strength for achor bolt (33 Ksi) 228 MPa
Ft_a All' tensile for achor bolt (0.6 x Fy_a) 137.3 MPa
Fv_a All' shear for achor bolt (0.3 x Fy_a) 68.6 MPa
Precast Prestressed Concrete Spun Pile JIS A 5335 or

equivalent using cement type II
f'c_p Comp' strength for conc' spun pile 600 kg/cm2
Epoxy Grouting ASTM C579

f'c_eg Min. Comp' strength at 28 days for epoxy grouting (990 kg/cm2) 97 MPa
Non Shrink Grouting ASTM C1107

f'c_g Comp' strength for non-shrink 48 MPa
grouting
1.5 Unit Weight of Material
Symbol Materials Value Unit
γc Reinforced Concrete 23.54 kN/m3

glc Lean Concrete 21.58 kN/m3
γst Steel 76.98 kN/m3
gs Soil 16.09 kN/m3
γw Water 9.81 kN/m3
gsg Sand Gravel 18.14 kN/m3
Page 4
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
1.6 Pile Foundation Capacity
Pile material = SPUN pile
Quality of concrete = 600 kg/cm2
Spun Pile = 400 mm
Pile length = 6 m
modulus elastic = 330000 kg/cm2
(Refer to attachment F for detail)
Single pile net. capacity for BH-04 SPUN Soil Invest (Ref. 3 )
Condition Qcomp Qtens Qlat
( kN ) ( kN ) ( kN )
Allowable Capacity :
Permanent 735.89 441.53 62.11
Temporary, increase 33% 978.73 573.99 80.74
Note : Qtens = 0.6 x Qcomp
(Refer to attachment A for detail)
E= 1 - q (n-1)m + (m-1)n
90 m n
q = arc tan (D/S)
m= number row of pile
n= number column of pile
E= Effieciency
E= 1 - Arctan(400 / 1500) x ((3 - 1) x 2) + (2 - 1) x 3))/(90 x 2 x 3)
E= 0.8064
Group pile net capacity for BH-04 SPUN 400 mm:
with Group Pile Effeciency = 0.8064
Condition Qcomp Qtens Qlat
( kN ) ( kN ) ( kN )
Allowable Capacity :
Permanent 593.45 356.07 50.09
Temporary, increase 33% 789.29 462.89 65.11
1.7 Abbreviation
D : Foundation weight
E€ : Empty weight
E(O) : Operating weight
E(T) : Hydrostatic Test Weight
LC 1 : factored load combination
LC 2 : unfactored load combination
L : Length of equipment
B : Width of equipment
Lf : Length of footing
Bf : Width of footing
tf : Thickness of footing
Page 5
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
Vol_f : Footing volume
F_f : Footing weight
Vol_fp : Concrete volume
F_fp : Concrete weight
Wx : Wind force in X dir.
Wy : Wind force in Y dir.
Eqex : Base shear in empty cond' in X dir.
EQey : Base shear in empty cond' in Y dir.
EQox : Base shear in operating cond' in X dir.
EQoy : Base shear in operating cond' in Y dir.
Mwx : Moment due to wind load in X dir.
Mwy : Moment due to wind load in Y dir.
Mqex : Moment due to EQ in empty cond' in X dir.
Mqey : Moment due to EQ in empty cond' in Y dir.
Mqox : Moment due to EQ in operating cond' in X dir.
Mqoy : Moment due to EQ in operating cond' in Y dir.
P : Axial Force from Load Combination
M : Moment Force from Load Combination
H : Lateral Force from Load Combination
Fv : Axial Reaction of Pile, (+) compression, (-) tension
Fh : Lateral Reaction of Pile
Mu : Maximum factored moment
c : Concrete cover
Drebar : Rebar diameter designed
df : Footing effective depth
b1 : Block stress depth factor
Ru : Coefficient of resistance
rreq : Required reinforcement ratio
rb : Balanced reinforcement ratio
rmax : Maximum reinforcement ratio
rmin : Minimum reinforcement ratio
As req : Total area of rebar required
As : Total area of rebar
nr : Number of rebar
s : Rebar spacing
w : Crack width
Ar : Area of Imaginary raft
p : Load per unit area
m : Poisson ratio
E : Young Modulus
Ip : Influence Factor
1.8 Abbreviation
- Unfactored loading combination is used for checking the axial and horizontal capacity of pile foundation.
- Stability due to overturning moment is checked based on the axial and horizontal capacity of pile.
- Factored loading combination is subsequently used for reinforced concrete design.
Page 6
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
2. DESIGN LOADING
2.1. Dead Load (D)

Selfweight of foundation structure including, but not limited to, footing and pedestal.
2.2. Equipment Load (E)

Weight of machinery or equipment including appurtenances and it is clasiffied as empty load E(E), operating load
E(O), and testing load E(T), unless noted otherwise, this load shall be regarded as " Dead Load".
Mechanical Data :
Type of machine = Transformer
Total Equipment (empty include skid) = 55000.00 kg
Total Equipment (Operating) = 26500.00 kg
2.3. Wind Load (W)
CL
Equipment Centerline
Ground
Picture 3.1
Equipment height for wind load coefficient determination.
2.3.1. Site condition impacted to wind load

- Exposure = C
- Case = Case1&2 (Ref. 2)
- Structure category = III
- Wind region : = "Non-Hurricane Prone Regions sand hurricane (Ref. 2)
Regions with V=85-100 mph and Alaska".
- Equipment shape : = Chimney, Tanks and Similar Structure in square (Ref.2)

shape.
Height equipment above ground level = 5.429 m

including skid height (z)
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
2.3.2. Velocity pressure, qz
qz Velocity pressure at height z
qz = 0.61 Kz Kzt Kd V2 I = 599.09 N/m2
where,
Kz = 0.85 unitless
Coefficient of velocity pressure exposure
Kzt Topographic factor = 1.00 unitless
Kd Wind directionality factor = 0.90 unitless
V Basic Wind Speed = 33.33 m/s
I Importance factor = 1.15 unitless
2.4. Earthquake Load (EQ)

2.4.1. Site condition impacted to earthquke load
- Seismic zone = 5 unitless
- Soil profile type = SD unitless
- Structure type = "Other structures"
- Occupancy category = "Essential Facilities".
CL
H z
Baseplate
Ground hb
Picture 3.2
Equipment height for earthquake load coefficient determination.
2.4.2 Rigidity of structure

H Structure elevation
H = z - hb = 5.429 - 0.3 = 5.129 m
Ct Numerical coefficient = 0.0488 unitless
"For all other buildings".
T Structure period
T = CtxH3/4 = 0.0488 x 5.129^3/4 = 0.17 second
T > 0.06 second
This structure is categorized as non-rigid structure.
where,
hb Pedestal height above ground = 0.15 m
2.4.3 Design seismic coefficient based on static force procedure

k Design seismic coeff. = 0.41 unitless
k tot Total base shear coeff.
ktot = Cv x I / ( R x T )= 0.37x1.5/(2.9x0.17) = 1.15 unitless
k min Min. base shear coeff.
kmin = 0.56 x Ca x I = 0.56 x 0.32 x 1.5 = 0.27 unitless
k max Max. base shear coeff.
kmax = 2.5 x Ca x I / R = 2.5 x 0.32 x 1.5/2.9 = 0.41 unitless
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
where,
Z Seismic zone factor = 0.4 unitless
Ca Seismic coefficient for soil type = 0.32 unitless
Cv Seismic coefficient for soil type = 0.37 unitless
I Importance factor = 1.50 unitless
R Seismic reduction factor = 2.90 unitless
ng, but not limited to, footing and pedestal.
ding appurtenances and it is clasiffied as empty load E(E), operating load

otherwise, this load shall be regarded as " Dead Load".
(Att.B)
(Att.B)
(Ref.2)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref. 3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
(Ref.3)
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
3. LOAD COMBINATION (LC)
3.1 Factored load combinations

The following factored load combination is used to design concrete reinforcement by Load and Resistance
Factored Design method :
1-1 1.4 D + 1.4 E(E)

1-2 1.2 D + 1.2 E(E) + 1.6 Wx
1-3 1.2 D + 1.2 E(E) + 1.6 Wy
1-4 0.9 D + 0.9 E(E) + 1.0 EQx
1-5 0.9 D + 0.9 E(E) + 1.0 EQy
1-6 1.4 D + 1.4 E(O)
1-7 1.2 D + 1.2 E(O) + 1.6 Wx
1-8 1.2 D + 1.2 E(O) + 1.6 Wy
1-9 0.9 D + 0.9 E(O) + 1.0 EQx
1-10 0.9 D + 0.9 E(O) + 1.0 EQy
1-11 1.4 D + 1.4 E(T)
1-12 1.2 D + EQy - 0.3 EQx
1-13 1.2 D - EQy + 0.3 EQx
1-14 1.2 D - EQy - 0.3 EQx
1-15 0.9 D + 1.3 Wx
1-16 1.2 D + 1.3 Wy
1-17 0.9 D + EQx + 0.3 EQy
1-18 0.9 D + EQx - 0.3 EQy
1-19 0.9 D - EQx + 0.3 EQy
1-20 0.9 D - EQx - 0.3EQy
1-21 0.9 D + EQy + 0.3 EQx
1-22 0.9 D + EQy - 0.3EQx
1-23 0.9 D - EQy + 0.3 EQx
1-24 0.9 D - EQy - 0.3EQx
3.2 Unfactored load combination

The following unfactored load combination is used to check foundation stability, design bolt capacity by
Allowable Stress Design.
2-1 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E)

2-2 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + Wx
2-3 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + Wy
2-4 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + 0.7 EQx
2-5 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + 0.7 EQy
2-6 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O)
2-7 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 1.0 Wx
2-8 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 1.0 Wy
2-9 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 0.7 EQx
2-10 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 0.7 EQy
2-11 1.0 D + 1.0 E(T)
2-12 1.0 D + 1.0 E(T) + 0.25 Wx
2-13 1.0 D + 1.0 E(T) + 0.25 Wy
2-14 0.6 D + 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy
2-15 0.6 D + 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy
2-16 0.6 D - 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy
2-17 0.6 D - 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy
2-18 0.6 D + 0.7 EQy + 0.3 EQx
2-19 0.6 D + 0.7 EQy - 0.3EQx
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
2-20 0.6 D - 0.7 EQy + 0.3 EQx
2-21 0.6 D - 0.7 EQy - 0.3EQx
2-22 D + 0.7 5LL + 0.45 Wx
2-23 D + 0.75 LL + 0.45 Wy
2-24 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy
2-25 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy
2-26 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy
2-27 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy
2-28 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7EQy + 0.3 EQx
2-29 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7 EQy - 0.3 EQx
2-30 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7EQy + 0.3 EQx
2-31 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7 EQy - 0.3 EQx
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
4. FOUNDATION GEOMETRY DESIGN
4.2. Foundation Dimension Design
1.0m
3.50 m
Bf 1.5m
1.0m
Y
1.0m 1.5m 1.5m 1.0m
Lf X
5.00 m
(a)
tf= 0.60 m
Note : This sketch is for

(b) illustration purpose
Picture 5.2 only, please refer to
Typical plan of footing. civil drawing.
(a) Top view; (b) Side view.
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
4.2.1 Data and assumptions
L Length of skid equipment = 3.84 m (Att. B.1)
B Width of skid equipment = 2.10 m (Att. B.1)
e Design Equipment Distance to Edge Foundation = 0.58 m
Lf Length of footing = 5.00 m
Bf Width of footing = 3.50 m
tf Thickness of footing = 0.60 m
dp pilecap thickness above FGL = 0.15 m
Vol_f Footing volume = 10.50 m3
Vol f = (Bf*Lf*tf)
F_f Footing weight = 247.17 kN

F_f = Vol_f * γc
where,
gc Unit weight of concrete = 23.54 kN/m3 (sect. 2.5)
Vol_fp Concrete volume = 10.50 m3

Vol_fp = Vol_f
F_fp Concrete weight = 247.17 kN
F_fp = F_f
E(O) = 259.97 kN
4.3. Pile Arrangement

Number of pile = 6 ea
Pile nos in X direction = 3 ea
Pile nos in Y direction = 2 ea
Check spacing between piles >= 3 Dp

3Dp = 1200 mm
Pile Coordinate
Distance pile to edge in X direction = 1.00 m
Pile nos in X = 4.00 ea
Distance pile to pile in X direction = 1.50 m >= 1.20 m OK
Distance pile to edge in Y direction = 1.00 m
Pile nos in Y = 2.00 ea
Distance pile to pile in Y direction = 1.50 m >= 1.20 m OK
Use Pile : Spun = 400 mm
Length = 6.0 m
Total nos = 6 ea
pile weight
= n*Lpi*Wpi = 39.91 kN
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
4.4. Loading Data
4.4.1 Dead Load (D)
Foundation weight = 247.17 kN
4.4.1.1 Live Load

Live load (include personal) is taken 5 kN/m2.
Then the skid is have dimension as follows :
- Number skid = 1 nos
- Width of skid = 2.100 m
- Length of skid = 3.840 m
Live Load = 1 * 2.1 * 3.84 * 5 kN/m2

= 40.32 kN
4.4.2 Equipment Load (E)

E(E) Empty weight = 539.55 kN
E(O) Operating weight = Test weight = 259.97 kN
4.4.3 Wind Load (W)

CL qz
hw/2
W hw z
hw/2
Footing zw
b.o.b
hb
Ground
(… b.o.b = bottom of base plate)
Picture 5.3
Scheme of center of gravity of equipment in wind condition.
Civil calculation (in both X and Y dir.)

Wx Wind force in X dir. (Fw = W)
W = qz x G x Cf x Afx = 599.09 x 0.85 x 1.2 x 13.3 = 8.13 kN
Wy Wind force in Y dir.
W = qz x G x Cf x Afy = 599.09 x 0.85 x 1.2 x 24.33 = 14.86 kN
Govern wind force (in both X and Y dir.)

Wx Wind force in X dir. = 8.13 kN
Wy Wind force in Y dir. = 14.86 kN
Mwx Moment due to wind load in X dir. = 26.33 kN.m
Mwy Moment due to wind load in Y dir. = 48.15 kN.m
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
where,
qz Velocity pressure at height z = 599.09 N/m2
G Gust factor = 0.85 unitless (Ref.2)
Cf Force coefficient = 1.2 unitless (very rough cond') (Ref.2)
Afx Projected wind area in X dir.
Afx = B * hw = 1.2 x 2.1 x 5.279 = 13.30 m2
Afy Projected wind area in Y dir.
Afy = L * hw = 1.2 x 3.84 x 5.279 = 24.33 m2
L Length of skid equipment = 3.84 m

B Width of skid equipment = 2.10 m
hw Projected wind height = 5.28 m
z Height equipment above ground level = 5.43 m
hb Height bottom of BP above ground lev. = 0.150 m
zw zw = z - hb - hw /2 + tf = 3.24 m
4.4.4 Earthquake Load (EQ)

CL
Vem
z
Vop
zqo zqe
Footing b.o.b
hb
Ground
Picture 5.4
Scheme of center of gravity of equipment in earthquake condition.
Civil Calculation (in both X and Y dir.)

Vemx Base shear in empty cond' in X dir.
Vemx = k x E(E) = 0.41 x 539.55 = 223.26 kN
Vemy Base shear in empty cond' in Y dir.
Vemy = k x E(E) = 0.41 x 539.55 = 223.26 kN
Vopx Base shear in operating cond' in X dir.

Vopx = k x E(O) = 0.41 x 259.97 = 107.57 kN
Vopy Base shear in operating cond' in Y dir.
Vopy= k x E(O) = 0.41 x 259.97 = 107.57 kN
Govern base shear

EQex Base shear in empty cond' in X dir. = 223.26 kN (Govern V empty)
EQey Base shear in empty cond' in Y dir. = 223.26 kN (Fe) vs (Vem)
EQox Base shear in operating cond' in X dir. = 107.57 kN (Govern V op)

EQoy Base shear in operating cond' in Y dir. = 107.57 kN (Fe) vs (Vop)
Mqex Moment due to EQ in empty cond' in X dir.

Mqe = EQex * zqe = 223.26 x 3.24 = 723.26 kN.m
Mqey Moment due to EQ in empty cond' in Y dir.
Mqe = EQey * zqe = 223.26 x 3.24 = 723.26 kN.m
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
Mqox Moment due to EQ in operating cond' in X dir.
Mqo = EQox * zqo = 107.57 x 3.24 = 348.48 kN.m
Mqoy Moment due to EQ in operating cond' in Y dir.
Mqo = EQoy * zqo = 107.57 x 3.24 = 348.48 kN.m
where,
k Design seismic coeff. = 0.41 unitless
E(E) Empty weight = 539.55 kN
E(O) Operating weight = 259.97 kN
zqe Center of gravity in empty cond' from bottom of footing (See = 3.240 m
Attachment C)
zqo Center of gravity in operating cond' from bottom of footing = 3.240 m
(See Attachment C)
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
4.5. Resume Loading
V Hx Hy My Mx
Load
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN.m) (KN.m)
D 247.17
E(E) 539.55
E(O) 259.97
E(T) 259.97
WX 8.13 48.15
WY 14.86 26.33
EQ(E)-X 223.26 723.26
EQ(E)-Y 223.26 723.26
EQ(O)-X 107.57 348.5
EQ(O)-Y 107.57 348.5
4.6. Load Combination Calculation

4.6.1 Load Combination for Concrete Footing Design
Factored load combination for concrete footing design (unit : m, kN)
V Hx Hy My Mx
LC Combination
1-1 1.4 D + 1.4 E(E) 1101.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1-2 1.2 D + 1.2 E(E) + 1.6 Wx 944.06 13.01 0.00 77.05 0.00
1-3 1.2 D + 1.2 E(E) + 1.6 Wy 944.06 0.00 23.78 0.00 42.13
1-4 0.9 D + 0.9 E(E) + 1.0 EQx 708.05 223.26 0.00 723.26 0.00
1-5 0.9 D + 0.9 E(E) + 1.0 EQy 708.05 0.00 223.26 0.00 723.26
1-6 1.4 D + 1.4 E(O) 710.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1-7 1.2 D + 1.2 E(O) + 1.6 Wx 608.6 13.01 0.00 77.05 0.00
1-8 1.2 D + 1.2 E(O) + 1.6 Wy 608.6 0.00 23.78 0.00 42.13
1-9 0.9 D + 0.9 E(O) + 1.0 EQx 456.42 107.57 0.00 348.5 0.00
1-10 0.9 D + 0.9 E(O) + 1.0 EQy 456.42 0.00 107.57 0.00 348.48
1-11 1.4 D + 1.4 E(T) 710.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1-12 1.2 D + EQy - 0.3 EQx 296.6 0.00 0.00 348.48 348.48
1-13 1.2 D - EQy + 0.3 EQx 296.6 0.00 0.00 -348.48 -348.48
1-14 1.2 D - EQy - 0.3 EQx 296.6 0.00 0.00 -348.48 -348.48
1-15 0.9 D + 1.3 Wx 222.5 10.57 0.00 0.00 0.00
1-16 1.2 D + 1.3 Wy 296.6 0.00 19.32 0.00 0.00
1-17 0.9 D + EQx + 0.3 EQy 222.5 0.00 0.00 348.48 104.54
1-18 0.9 D + EQx - 0.3 EQy 222.5 0.00 0.00 348.48 -104.54
1-19 0.9 D - EQx + 0.3 EQy 222.5 0.00 0.00 -348.48 104.54
1-20 0.9 D - EQx - 0.3EQy 222.5 0.00 0.00 -348.48 -104.54
1-21 0.9 D + EQy + 0.3 EQx 222.5 0.00 0.00 104.54 348.48
1-22 0.9 D + EQy - 0.3EQx 222.5 0.00 0.00 -104.54 348.48
1-23 0.9 D - EQy + 0.3 EQx 222.5 0.00 0.00 104.54 -348.48
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
1-24 0.9 D - EQy - 0.3EQx 222.5 0.00 0.00 -104.54 -348.48
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
4.6.2 Load Combination for Foundation Stability Check
Table 5.2 Unfactored load combination for foundation stability check (unit : m, kN)
V Hx Hy My Mx
LC Combination
2-1 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) 786.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-2 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + Wx 786.72 8.13 0.00 48.15 0.00
2-3 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + Wy 786.72 0.00 14.86 0.00 26.33
2-4 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + 0.7 EQx 786.72 156.28 0.00 506.28 0.00
2-5 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E) + 0.7 EQy 799.5 0.00 156.28 0.00 506.28
2-6 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) 507.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-7 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 1.0 Wx 507.1 8.13 0.00 48.15 0.00
2-8 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 1.0 Wy 507.1 0.00 14.86 0.00 26.33
2-9 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 0.7 EQx 507.1 75.30 0.00 243.94 0.00
2-10 1.0 D + 1.0 E(O) + 0.7 EQy 507.1 0.00 75.30 0.00 243.94
2-11 1.0 D + 1.0 E(T) 507.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-12 1.0 D + 1.0 E(T) + 0.25 Wx 507.1 2.03 0.00 12.04 0.00
2-13 1.0 D + 1.0 E(T) + 0.25 Wy 507.1 0.00 3.72 0.00 6.58
2-14 0.6 D + 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy 148.3 75.30 32.27 243.94 104.54
2-15 0.6 D + 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy 148.3 75.30 -32.27 243.94 -104.54
2-16 0.6 D - 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy 148.3 -75.30 32.27 -243.94 104.54
2-17 0.6 D - 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy 148.3 -75.30 -32.27 -243.94 -104.54
2-18 0.6 D + 0.7 EQy + 0.3 EQx 148.3 32.27 75.30 104.54 243.94
2-19 0.6 D + 0.7 EQy - 0.3EQx 148.3 -32.27 75.30 -104.54 243.94
2-20 0.6 D - 0.7 EQy + 0.3 EQx 148.3 32.27 -75.30 104.54 -243.94
2-21 0.6 D - 0.7 EQy - 0.3EQx 148.3 -32.27 -75.30 -104.54 -243.94
2-22 D + 0.7 5LL + 0.45 Wx 442.1 48.41 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-23 D + 0.75 LL + 0.45 Wy 442.1 0.00 48.41 0.00 0.00
2-24 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy 442.1 0.00 0.00 243.94 104.54
2-25 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy 442.1 0.00 0.00 243.94 -104.54
2-26 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7 EQx + 0.3 EQy 442.1 0.00 0.00 -243.94 104.54
2-27 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7 EQx - 0.3 EQy 442.1 0.00 0.00 -243.94 -104.54
2-28 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7EQy + 0.3 EQx 442.1 0.00 0.00 104.54 243.94
2-29 D + 0.75 LL + 0.7 EQy - 0.3 EQx 442.1 0.00 0.00 -104.54 243.94
2-30 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7EQy + 0.3 EQx 442.1 0.00 0.00 104.54 -243.94
2-31 D + 0.75 LL - 0.7 EQy - 0.3 EQx 442.1 0.00 0.00 -104.54 -243.94
South Sumatra NGL Project
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Foundation Design for Lean Gas Compressor Package (01-K-2301) A/B
7.0. DYNAMIC/VIBRATION CHECK
Dynamic Soil Properties

Symbol Description Value Unit Remarks
N number of SPT Blows (uncorrected) 9.00 unitless Ref 3.
vs shear wave velocity 190.82 m/sec Ref. 8. Eq. 4.23
= 91 * N^0.337 626.05 ft/sec
γd dry density 15.696 kN/m3 Ref 3.
99.92 lb/ft3
ρ mass density = γd/g 3.11 lb/ft3
G shear modulus = ρ*Vs^2 1218.01 kip/ft2 Ref. 8. Eq. 4.19b
Ep young modulus of pile material 679130.43 kip/ft2
Ap cross sectional area of pile 248.00 in2
= bxh
R equivalent radius of pile 7.87 in
= 0.5 x b
Ip moment Inertia of the pile cross section 5,125.35 in4
= 1/12 x b h3 0.2472 ft4
Vertical Motion
fz1 Novak and Grigg's stiffness factor 0.067 unitless Ref. 7. Fiq. 11.6
Ep/G 557.57 unitless
Lpi/R 30.00 unitless
fz2 Novak's damping factor 0.040 unitless Ref. 7. Fiq. 11.7
Lpi/R 30.00 unitless
kz 1 effective spring constant = (Ep*A/R)*fz1 119,427.1 kip/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5.5
Cz 2 effective damping constant = (Ep*A/vs)*fz2 74.73 kip-sec/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5.6
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 24 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Y Note : This sketch is for

illustration purpose only,
please refer to civil drawing.
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6
BPC
2.2
X
SY
P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
1.9m 1.9m 0.95 0.95 1.9m 1.9m
SX
LPC
Stiffness & Damping for Pile Group And Pilecap

αr Interaction Factor (Reference Pile 1) Ref. 6. Fig. 5.2
L/2R = 15.00
Pile 1 S= 0.00 S/2R = 0.00 1.00 unitless
Pile 2 S= 4.92 2R/S = 0.27 0.39 unitless
Plotted from
Pile 6 S= 24.61 2R/S = 0.05 0.16 unitless figure 5.2
Pile 7 S= 4.92 2R/S = 0.27 0.35 unitless (ref.11.)
Sαr summary 4.67 unitless
h the depth of embedment of pilecap 1.48 ft
v poisson's ratio 0.40 unitless assumed
Sz1 frequency independent constant 2.70 unitless Ref. 6. Table. 5-1
Sz2 frequency independent constant 6.70 unitless Ref. 6. Table. 5-1
Rf equivalent radius of pilecap 7.74 ft

= ((BPC * LPC)/PI())^(0.5)
g unit weight of soil 99.92 lb/ft3
kz f footing stiffness constant = G*h*Sz1 4,855.19 Kips/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5-10
Czf footing damping constant 148.91 Kip-sec/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5-11
= h*Rf*(G*γ/g)^0.5*Sz2
Skz1 = npile * kz1 716562.821 kip/ft Ref. 7. Eq. 5-15
Scz1 = npile * cz1 448.382173 kip/ft Ref. 7. Eq. 5-16
kzg group spring constant = (Skz1/Sαr) + kzf 158294.764 kip-sec/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5-8
Czg group damping constant 356.39 kip-sec/ft
= (Scz1/(Sαr)^0.5)+czf
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 25 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
mc total mass 3.82 kip-sec2/ft
Dzg equivalent geometric damping ratio 0.14 unitless
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 26 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
= Scz1/2*(Skz1*mc)^0.5
ωn undamped natural frequency = (kzg/mc)^0.5 203.59 rad/sec Ref. 7. Eq. 11.22
fn undamped natural frequency = ωn/ 2p 32.40 Hz
fn undamped natural frequency = 60*ωn/2p 1944.11 rpm Ref. 7. Eq. 11.23
fmr resonance frequency 1980.83 rpm Ref. 7. Eq. 11.25
= fn/(1-2Dzg^2)^0.5 33.01 Hz
f/fmr 0.38 unitless OK, <0.7 or >1.4
m1 mass of motor 0.19 kip-sec2/ft
mi total rotating mass 0.19 kip-sec2/ft

Azr amplitude of vibration at resonance 3.03E-02 ft Ref. 7. Eq. 11.27
= ((mi*e)/mc)*(1/(2Dzg*(1-Dzg^2)^0.5)) 0.36373 inch
Azr amplitude of vibration at frequency other 1.35E-03 ft Ref. 7. Eq. 11.29
than resonance 0.01620 inch
={(mi*e/mc)*(ω/ωn)^2}/{((1-(ω^2/ωn^2)^2)+(4*Dzg^2*(ω^2/ωn^2)))^0.5}
Conclusion :
1. Resonance on the foundation shall be avoided and the natural frequency shall be within the limits as
specified. f/fmr < 0.7 or f/fmr>1.4 (f/mr = 0.38).
2. Amplitude of vibration at resonance
Azr = 0.36373 in
From figure 3-3 ref 6. this amplitude is within the safe allowable limits.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 27 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 28 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Velocity equals: 2pf x displacement amplitude = 1.272 in/sec

From table 3.2 Ref. 6. this velocity falls in the Slightly rough operation range and is, therefore acceptable.
4. Resonance. The acting of the machine should have at least a difference of 20 % with the resonance
frequency. There is no resonance frequency in the vertical mode.
fmr = 1980.83 rpm > 900.00 rpm (80% f) OK
Horizontal Motion
fx1 Novak's stiffness factor 0.0425 Ref. 7. Table 11.1
μ 0.40 unitless
fx2 Novak's stiffness factor 0.1029 Ref. 7. Table 11.1
μ 0.40 unitless
Ep/G ` unitless
kx1 effective spring constant = (Ep*Ip/R^3)*fx1 25,272.1 kip/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5.12
Cx1 effective damping constant 64.07 kip-sec/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5.13
= (Ep*Ip/R^2*vs)*fx2
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 29 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Stiffness and Damping for Pile Group and Pilecap
αr Interaction Factor (Reference Pile 1) Ref. 7. Fig. 11.14
Pile 1 β= 0 S/2R = 0.00 0.80 unitless
Pile 2 β= 0 S/2R = 3.75 - unitless
Pile 4 β= 0 S/2R = 11.25 unitless
Pile 9 β = 26.6 S/2R = 2.93 - unitless
Sαr summary 0.80 unitless
Sx1 frequency independent constant 4.10 unitless Ref. 6. Table 5-1
Sx2 frequency independent constant 10.60 unitless Ref. 6. Table 5-1
kxf footing stiffness constant = G*h*Sx1 7,372.69 kips/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5-16
Cx f
footing damping constant 235.22 kip-sec/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5-17
= h*Rf*(Gs*γ/g)^0.5*Sx2
Skx1 = npile * kx1 151632.87 kip/ft
SCx1 = npile * Cx1 384.43 kip/ft
kxg group spring constant = (Skx1/Sαr) 189541.08 kip-sec/ft Ref. 6. Eq. 5-14
Cx g
group damping constant 493.87 kip-sec/ft
= (SCx1/(Sαr)^0.5)+Cxf
mc total mass 3.82 kip-sec2/ft
Dxg equivalent geometric damping ratio 0.28 unitless Ref. 6. Eg. 5.15
= Scx1/2*(Skx1*mc)^0.5*(SαL)^0.5
ωn undamped natural frequency = (kxg/mc)^0.5 222.78 rad/sec Ref. 7. Eq. 11.22
fn undamped natural frequency = 60*ωn/2p 2127.35 rpm Ref. 7. Eq. 11.23
fn undamped natural frequency = ωn/2p 35.46 Hz
fmr resonance frequency 2320.43 rpm Ref. 7. Eq. 11.25
= fn/(1-2Dxg^2)^0.5 38.67 Hz
f/fmr 0.32 unitless OK, <0.7 or >1.4
Axr amplitude of vibration at resonance 1.50E-02 ft Ref. 7. Eq. 11.27
= ((mi*e)/mc)*(1/(2Dxg*(1-Dxg^2)^0.5)) 0.18028 inch
Axr amplitude of vibration at frequency other 1.06E-03 ft Ref. 7. Eq. 11.29
than resonance 0.01275 inch
={(mi*e/mc)*(ω/ωn)^2}/{((1-(ω^2/ωn^2)^2)+(4*Dxg2*(ω^2/ωn^2)))^0.5}
Conclusion :
1. Resonance on the foundation shall be avoided and the natural frequency shall be within the limits as
specified. f/fmr < 0.7 or f/fmr>1.4 (f/mr = 0.32).
2. Amplitude of vibration at resonance
Azr = 0.18028 in
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 30 of 35
______________________________________________________________________________________________
From figure 3-3 Ref 6. this amplitude is within the safe allowable limits.
3. Velocity equals: 2pf x displacement amplitude = 14.159 in/sec

From table 3.2 Att. G this velocity falls in the slightly rough operation range.
4. Resonance. The acting of the machine should have at least a difference of 20 % with the resonance
frequency. There is no resonance frequency in the Horizontal mode.
fmr = 2320.43 rpm > 900.00 rpm (80% f) OK
______________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls Page 31 of 35
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
5. PILING DESIGN
1.0m
1.5m
Bf = 3.5m X
1.0m
Y
1.0m 1.5m 1.5m 1.0m
X
Lf = 5.0 m
Note : This sketch is for

Pile ni xi ni.xi2 Pile ni yi ni.yi2

Coordinate (m) (m2) Coordinate (m) (m2)
2.00 1.500 4.500 8.00 0.75 4.5
2.00 0.000 0.000 8.00 -0.75 4.5
2.00 -1.500 4.500 Σni = 16.00 Σni.Yi2 = 9
Σni = 6.00 Σni.xi2 = 9.000 Zpy = Σni.Yi2 / Yi (max) = 12.00
Zpx = Σni.xi / xi (max) =
2
6.00
Zp = 6.00
Pile Capacity Summary

for Allowable Capacity (kN)
LC Remark Qcomp Qtens Qlat
2-1 593.45 356.07 50.09
2-2 789.29 462.89 65.11
2-3 789.29 462.89 65.11
2-4 593.45 462.89 50.09
2-27 789.29 462.89 65.11
2-28 789.29 462.89 65.11
2-29 789.29 462.89 65.11
2-30 593.45 356.07 50.09
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
Capacity Check:
Pile Depth = 6 m
n = 6 piles
P My Mx
F v max   
S n Zpx Zpy
P My Mx
F v min   
S n Zpx Zpy
V
H 
Sn
P = Axial Force from Load Combination (kN)
M = Moment Force from Load Combination (kNm)
V = Lateral Force from Load Combination (kN)
H = Lateral Force from Load Combination Each Pile (kN)
Fv = Axial Reaction of Pile, (+) compression, (-) tension (kN)
Fh = Lateral Reaction of Pile = H (kN)
Zp = Modulus shape of pile foundation (m)
Single Pile Axial Capacity Check:

LC Axial Lateral (kN) Moment (kN.m) Fvmax Fvmin
(kN) H-x H-y M-x M-y x dir y dir x dir y dir
2-1 786.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131.12 131.12 131.12 131.12
2-2 786.72 8.13 0.00 0.00 48.15 139.15 131.12 123.09 131.12
2-3 786.72 0.00 14.86 26.33 0.00 133.31 131.12 128.93 131.12
2-4 786.72 156.28 0.00 0.00 506.28 215.50 131.12 46.74 131.12
2-27 442.14 0.00 0.00 243.94 104.54 111.44 73.69 35.94 73.69
2-28 442.14 0.00 0.00 243.94 -104.54 76.59 73.69 70.79 73.69
2-29 442.14 0.00 0.00 -243.94 104.54 70.79 73.69 76.59 73.69
2-30 442.14 0.00 0.00 -243.94 -104.54 35.94 73.69 111.44 73.69
Check
Fv-xmax Fv-ymax Fv-xmin Fv-ymin Allowable
LC Result
Ratio
Qcomp Qcomp Qcomp Qcomp
2-1 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-2 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.17 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-3 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.17 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-4 0.36 0.22 0.08 0.22 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-27 0.14 0.09 0.05 0.09 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-28 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-29 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-30 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.12 1.00 < 1 …OK
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
Single Pile Lateral Capacity Check:
LC Fh-x Fh-y Check Allowable
Result
(kN) (kN) Fh-x /Qlat Fh-y/Qlat Ratio
2-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-2 1.35 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-3 0.00 2.48 0.00 0.04 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-4 26.05 0.00 0.52 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
2-30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 < 1 …OK
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
6. CONCRETE PILECAP REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
6.1 General
6.1.1 Foundation Specification
Concrete
fc' Compressive strength for structural concrete 30.0 MPa sect. 2.4
fc' Compressive strength for leveling concrete 14 MPa sect. 2.4
Reinforcing Steel Bar
fy Min. yield strength for deformed bar 400 MPa sect. 2.4
6.2 Bending Moment for Pilecap Design

6.2.1 Bending Moment x direction (My)
y
P1 P2 P3
yo x
1.5 m
P4 P5 P6
Mid Span 1
Span = 1,100 mm
1.1 m
xo
Fig. 8.1 Critical Moment Strip Considered (in x direction)
d 542 mm (effective depth)

Spun 400 mm (diameter of spun pile)
Lf 5000 mm (Length of foundation)
Bf 3500 mm (width of foundation)
Lx 1500 mm (distance of pile to pile in x direction)
Ly 1500 mm (distance of pile to pile in y direction)
xo 3000.00 mm (distance of outest pile in x direction)
yo 2500.00 mm (distance of outest pile in y direction)
Uniform Load
Maximum axial force due to factored load combination:
P = 1101.41 kN
Area load due to factored axial force :
Pa = P / (xo*yo) = 1101.41 / (3 * 2.5)
= 146.85 kN/m2
Load along span with 1 m width
qu = Pa * width = 146.85 * 1
= 146.85 kN/m
Ultimate Moment
Span considered as pinned at both end
Ult. Moment (Mu) = = 1/8 x qu x Span2
= 22.21 kNm
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
6.2.2 Bending Moment y direction (Mx)
y
P1 P2 P3
x
1,1 m
P4 P5
Mid Span 2
P6
Span = 1100.00 mm
Width = 1500.00 mm
1,5 m
Fig. 8.2 Critical Moment Strip Considered (in y direction)
Ultimate Moment
Span considered as pinned at both end
Ult. Moment (Mu) = = 1/8 x qu x Span2
22.21 kN.m
6.3 Pilecap Flexural Reinforcement ( Top & Bottom Reinforcement )

The followings are the flexural reinforcement for pilecap per 1 meter width:
Mu Maximum factored moment = 22.21 kN.m (Mx and My govern)
tf Thickness of footing = 0.60 m
c Concrete cover = 50 mm
Drebar Rebar diameter designed = 16 mm
df Footing effective depth
df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = 0.6- 0.05-0.5 x 0.016 = 0.54 m
b1 Block stress depth factor 0.80
Ru Coefficient of resistance f= 0.9
Ru =Mu/(f*width * df2) = 22.21/(0.9 x 1 x 0.54^2) = 0.08 MPa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc')= 400 / (0.85 x 30) = 15.69
ρreq Required reinforcement ratio
ρreq = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.02 %
ρb Balanced reinforcement ratio
ρb = (b1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.06 %
ρmax Maximum reinforcement ratio

ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.30 %
ρmin Minimum reinforcement ratio = 0.18 %
ρmin = 1.4 / fy if 1.33 * ρreq > 1.4 / fy or
ρmin = 0.18 % if 1.33 * ρreq < 1.4 / fy
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
ρneed Needed reinforcement ratio = 0.03 %
ρneed = ρreq if ρreq > 1.4 / fy or
ρneed = 1.33 * ρreq < 1.4 / fy if ρreq < 1.4 / fy
ρused Largest value between rmin and rneed = 0.18 % < ρmax, OK
As req Total area of rebar required

As req = ρused * width * df = 975.60 mm2
As Total area of rebar 201.06 mm2
As = 0.25 * p * Drebar2
nr Number of rebar = 4.852 ea
nr = As req / As
nru Number of rebar used = 5 ea
s Rebar spacing
s = 1000/nru = 200 mm
Use D16 - 200 mm for top and bottom flexural reinforcement.
6.4 Check Shear Concrete of Pile

Number of pile n = 6 Piles
Ultimate shear load H = 223.26 kN
Concrete Quality of Pile fc' = 41.5 MPa
Ap = 0.25 * PI()*(Dpo^2-Dpi^2)
Area of pile Ap = 76537.50 mm2
Pile shear strength without reinforcement :
Vc = 2 Öfc' b d / 12 (Ref.4 Sect. 11.3 Eq. 11-3)
taking b x d = Ac then:
f Vc / Ac = 0.75 x 41.5^0.5 x 2/12
= 0.81 MPa
Vupile max / Ac = Vu/(n x Ap)/Ac = 0.486 MPa < 0.81 MPa (ok)
6.5 Pilecap Shear Reinforcement
6.4.1 One Way Slab Action Shear
Maximum Pile Reaction = 183.568 kN
Vu1 / Ac max = 0.387 MPa (See attachment D sect D.2)
Allowable bending shear for slab without reinforcement :
Vc = 2 Öfc' b d / 12 (Ref.1 Sect. 11.3 Eq. 11-3)
taking b x d = Ac then:
f Vc / Ac = 0.75 x Öfc' x 2 / 12
= 0.75 x 30^0.5 x 2/12
= 0.68 Mpa
Vu1 max / Ac = 0.39 Mpa < 0.68 Mpa (ok)
( No shear reinforcement needed )
6.4.2 Punching Shear

Vup max = 183.57 kN (See Att. D.3)
Allowable punching shear for slab without reinforcement :
Vc = k Öfc' bo d (Ref.1 sect 11.12.2.1 Eq. 11-37)
= 2085.98 kN
(k value refer to attachment D sect. D.3)
f Vc = 0.75 x 2085.98
= 1564.49 kN
Vup max < f Vc OK
( No shear reinforcement needed )
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
6.6 Maximum Crack Width on Tension Area
w Crack width = 0.05 mm
w < 0.33 mm, Ok..
w  1.11  10 6  b  fs  3 dc  A
where,
b Height factor (1.2 for beam,1.35 for slab) 1.35
fy Min. yield strength for deformed bar 400.00 MPa
fs Reinforcement calculated stress at service load shall be 0.6fy 240.00 MPa
dc Thickness of concrete cover 58.00 mm
dc = c + 0.5*Ø rebar
As Effective tension area divided by number of bar 34800.00 mm2
nr Number of rebar 5.00 ea
W Widht of the analyzed section 1500.00 mm
2 dc
W
sect. 2.4
sect. 2.4
sect. 2.4
(Mx and My govern)
< ρmax, OK
w < 0.33 mm, Ok..
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
7. ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN
Number of bolt required and configuration has to be confirmed with mechanical requirement. Anchor Bolt Design
by Vendor.
8. SETTLEMENT CALCULATION
The settlement of pile group with average depth of 6 m was analyzed using elastic half-space theory proposed
by Timoshenko and Goodier (1951) and Poulos and Davis (1980) as shown below.
Imaginary raft at the depth of 2/3 the length of pile was assumed with load spreading of
4v : 1h. The settlement were estimated below.
4
p
B raft
V = 799.5 kN
B raft = 5.00 m
Area of Imaginary raft (Ar) = 25.00 m2
Load per unit area, p = V/Ar = 31.981 kPa
Poisson ratio, µ = 0.25
Young Modulus, E = 330000 kPa
Influence Factor, Ip = 0.85
1  2
Elastic Settlement,  i  p .B . Ip = 0.00038613
E
= 0.39
Check Settlement < 25 mm ….OK
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
9. CONCLUSION
- Summary of Pile Design
The following table summarizes the design result of piling foundation in governing cases
Maximum
Description Forces Capacity Load Remarks
Fv Max ( KN ) 215.50 789.29 LC2-4 ok

Fv Min ( KN ) 131.12 789.29 LC2-1 ok
Lateral ( KN ) 26.05 65.11 LC2-4 ok
Fv ( KN ) 131.12 789.29 LC2-1 ok
- Number of pile use = 6 Spun diameter 400 mm, effective length 6 m
- Footing shall be 5000 mm x 3500 mm with height 600 mm, D16-200 mm flexural reinforcement.
- Settlement of the structure is 0.39 mm at center of foundation.

tion has to be confirmed with mechanical requirement. Anchor Bolt Design
rage depth of 6 m was analyzed using elastic half-space theory proposed

d Poulos and Davis (1980) as shown below.
mm
arizes the design result of piling foundation in governing cases
Remarks
ok
ok
ok
ok
x 3500 mm with height 600 mm, D16-200 mm flexural reinforcement.

#REF!
#REF!
11.1 Foundation Layout

Y
0.7m
Bf 1.8m
X
0.7m
Y
0.7m 2.275m 2.275m 2.275m 2.275m 0.7m
Lf 10.5m X
(a)
tf=1.8.8
(b)
Picture 10.1
Typical plan of footing.
(a) top view.
(b) side view.
11.2 Foundation Reinforcement D16 - 200
____________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls _ Page 34 of 38
#REF!
#REF!
Picture 10.2
Typical of footing reinforcement.
____________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls _ Page 35 of 38
#REF!
#REF!
Table 10.1.1 Data and assumptions

Footing
Lf Length of footing 5.00 m
Bf Width of footing 3.50 m
tf Thickness of footing 0.60 m
Concrete MTO
Vol_fp Concrete volume 10.50 m3
F_fp Concrete weight 247.17 kN
____________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls _ Page 36 of 38
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT A
SOIL PROPERTIES
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT B
EQUIPMENT PROPERTIES
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT C
CENTER OF GRAVITY CALCULATION
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT D
SHEAR CRITICAL SECTION
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT E
ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT F
CONCRETE SPUN PILE REFERENCE
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT G
FOUNDATION PLAN AND PILING LAYOUT DRAWING
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT A
SOIL PROPERTIES
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT B
UIPMENT PROPERTIES
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT C
OF GRAVITY CALCULATION
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT D
EAR CRITICAL SECTION
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT E
NCHOR BOLT DESIGN
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT F
ETE SPUN PILE REFERENCE
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
#REF!
#REF!
ATTACHMENT G
LAN AND PILING LAYOUT DRAWING
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_
Ultimate compression capacities of piles, Qcom (kN) at Extraction & SKG-10 for various pile length (m)
based on NSPT are presented in the table below :
PC Spun Qcom (kN)

Pile Type PC Pile dia. 300 mm PC Pile dia. 350 mm PC Pile dia. 400 mm PC Pile dia. 450 mm
Penetration
18 20 22 18 20 22 18 20 22 18 20 22
Length (m)
BH-1 1600 2400 2900 2100 3000 3600 2600 3800 4400 3000 4700 5300
BH-2 1900 2400 3000 2400 3000 3900 2900 3900 4800 3200 4100 5600
BH-3 1500 1800 3000 1900 2300 3700 2200 2800 4600 2700 3300 5600
BH-4 2000 2700 3000 2700 3600 4200 2900 4000 4600 3400 4800 5400
BH-5 1500 2000 3000 1800 2400 3800 2150 2750 4550 2500 3600 5300
BH-1 (SKG) 1200 1300 1300 1500 1700 1700 1700 1900 1900 2200 2300 2300
Min 1200 1300 1300 1500 1700 1700 1700 1900 1900 2200 2300 2300
Allowable compression capacities of piles, Qcom (ton) at Extraction & SKG-10 for various pile length (m)
based on NSPT are presented in the table below : with SF= 3
PC Spun Qcom (ton)

Pile Type PC Pile dia. 300 mm PC Pile dia. 350 mm PC Pile dia. 400 mm PC Pile dia. 450 mm
Penetration
18 20 22 18 20 22 18 20 22 18 20 22
Length (m)
BH-1 54.38 81.58 98.57 71.38 101.97 122.37 88.38 129.16 149.56 101.97 159.76 180.15
BH-2 64.58 81.58 101.97 81.58 101.97 132.56 98.57 132.56 163.15 108.77 139.36 190.35
BH-3 50.99 61.18 101.97 64.58 78.18 125.76 74.78 95.17 156.36 91.77 112.17 190.35
BH-4 67.98 91.77 101.97 91.77 122.37 142.76 98.57 135.96 156.36 115.57 163.15 183.55
BH-5 50.99 67.98 101.97 61.18 81.58 129.16 73.08 93.47 154.66 84.98 122.37 180.15
BH-1 (SKG) 40.79 44.19 44.19 50.99 57.78 57.78 57.78 64.58 64.58 74.78 78.18 78.18
Min 40.79 44.19 44.19 50.99 57.78 57.78 57.78 64.58 64.58 74.78 78.18 78.18
Ultimate compression capacities of piles, Qcom (kN) at Extraction & SKG-10 for various pile length (m)
based on NSPT are presented in the table below :
Square Qcom (kN)

Pile Type square 200 mm square 300 mm
Penetration
8 9 10 8 9 10
Length (m)
BH-1 480 550 590 660 700 750
BH-2
BH-3
BH-4
BH-5
BH-1 (SKG)
Min
Allowable compression capacities of piles, Qcom (ton) at Extraction & SKG-10 for various pile length (m)
based on NSPT are presented in the table below : with SF= 3
Square Qcom (ton)

Pile Type square 200 mm square 300 mm
Penetration
8 9 10 8 9 10
Length (m)
BH-1 16.32 18.69 20.05 22.43 23.79 25.49
BH-2
BH-3
BH-4
BH-5
BH-1 (SKG)
Min
PC Spun Allowable Lateral Capacity (ton)

Pile Type square dia. 200 mm PC Pile dia. 300 mm PC Pile dia. 400 mm
2.5 5 8
________________________________________________________________________________________
Foundation Design for Feed Gas Compressor Package (01-K-2101) A/B
__________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls (Attachment A) _________________ Page 52 of 89
________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
#REF!
#REF!
A.1 Location for BH-04
Diesel Engine Generator

Foundation
A.2 Allowable Axial Pile Bearing Capacity for BH-04

437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page A.57 of 89
_
#REF!
#REF!
A.3 Allowable Lateral Pile Bearing Capacity for BH-04
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page A.58 of 89
_
#REF!
#REF!
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page A.59 of 89
_
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
A. Equipment Properties
A.1. Loading data (total loads)

E(E) Empty weight = 55.00 ton
E(O) Operating weight = 26.50 ton
E(T) Hydrostatic Test Weight = 26.50 ton
zb
hb
Picture B.1
Equipment dimension.
Table A.1. Equipment Properties

B Width of skid equipment = 2100 mm
L Length of skid equipment = 3840 mm
z Height equipment above ground level = 5429 mm
z = zb + hb
zb Height equipment above base plate = 5279 mm
hb Height bottom of BP above ground lev. = 150 mm
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page B.1 of 89
(Att B.2)
(Att B.2)
(Att B.2)
Picture B.1
Equipment dimension.
(Att B.2)
(Att B.2)
(Att B.2)
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page B.2 of 89
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
B.2. Vendor Drawing (assumed for estimated weight)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls (Attachment B) ___ Page 3 of 89
B.2 Vendor Data and Drawing
Client Name :
PT PLN INDONESIA
C. Equipment Center of Gravity
CL
Vem
zb z
Vop
zqo zqe
b.o.b
Footing hb
Ground
(… b.o.b = bottom of base plate)
Picture C.1
Center of gravity of equipment scheme.
ze Center of gravity in empty cond' of equipment zb/2 = 2639.50 mm

zqe Center of gravity in empty cond' from bottom of = 3239.50 mm
footing
zo Center of gravity in operating cond' of equipment zb/2 = 2639.50 mm

zqo Center of gravity in operating cond' from bottom = 3239.50 mm
of footing
where,
zb Height equipment above base plate = 5279.0 mm
z Height equipment above ground level = 5429.0 mm
tf Thickness of footing = 600.0 mm
437256598.xls
________________________________________________________________________________________
Page C.1 of 89
____
________________________________________________________________________________________________
D.1. Type-2 bolt capacity
- BOLT CAPACITY and boundaries are refer to SSNP drawing no

SSNP-GEN-CIV-STD-023 "Standard Drawing Anchor Bolt" Table Type-2
- Type- 1 bolt is bolt selected for equipment with base block such as column equipment and
vertical vessel, etc.
- All material shall be in accordance with project specification
Bolt = ASTM A307 Grade C (Ref. 1 sect 5.1)
Concrete with fc' = 28 MPa
Table D.1 Type-2 bolt capacity and boundaries

db (mm) Le (mm) F (mm) E (mm) Tall (kN) Vall (kN)
1/2 13 230 39 80 16.7 8.6
5/8 18 280 48 100 26 13.5
3/4 20 320 57 100 37.5 19.4
7/8 22 370 66 100 51.1 26.5
1 25 420 75 150 66.7 34.6
1 1/4 32 510 96 150 104 54
1 1/2 38 600 114 150 150 77.8
1 3/4 44 690 132 200 204 106
2 50 780 153 200 267 138
2 1/4 56 870 171 200 338 175
2 1/2 64 970 192 250 417 216
3 75 1150 228 250 600 311
db = Bolt diameter, GL-00-STR-047 use notation "d"

Le = Minimum bolt embedment, GL-00-STR-047 use notation "A"
F = Bolt pitch, minimum distance of bolt center to center
E = Minimum bolt distance from concrete block edge
Tall = Bolt allowable tension capacity
Vall = Bolt allowable shear capacity
________________________________________________________________________________________________
437256598.xls (Attachment D) Page 2 of 89
#REF!
#REF!
D.1 Maximum Pile Forces due to Factored Load

The following table are maximum pile forces due to factored load combination:
Load
Combinatio Axial V M V ± M
n Force Moment S ni Zp S ni Zp
( kN ) ( kN m ) ( kN ) ( kN ) ( kN )
LC1-1 1101.4 0.0 183.57 0.00 183.568
183.568
LC1-2 944.1 0.0 157.34 0.00 157.344
157.344
LC1-3 944.1 42.1 157.34 7.02 164.366
150.322
LC1-4 708.0 0.0 118.01 0.00 118.008
118.008
LC1-5 222.5 348.5 37.08 58.08 95.155
-21.004
LC1-6 222.5 348.5 37.08 58.08 95.155
-21.004
LC1-7 222.5 -348.5 37.08 -58.08 -21.004
95.155
LC1-8 222.5 -348.5 37.08 -58.08 -21.004
95.155
D.2 One Way Slab Action Shear Forces

Footing is designed to resist pile reaction for one way slab action, at distance d from outer skin of
pile
need not to be considered
S1
S3
P1 P2 P3
S2
Ly
P4 P5 P6 y1
S4
Lx
x1
Fig. D.1a One Way Slab Action Fig. D.1b Free Body Diagram
Plan
Fig E.1b show free body diagram at the end of the beam. Ref 3 section 11.1.3.1 state that section located
less then d (effective beam depth) shall be permitted to be designed for the same shear as computed at
distance d. In that case, some critical section shall need not to be considered if equipment load are in side
the critical line example:
Where d = 542 mm
Spun = 400 mm
Lf = 5000 mm
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page D.1 of 89
#REF!
#REF!
Bf = 3500 mm
Lx = 1500 mm (distance pile to pile in x direction)
Ly = 1500 mm (distance of pile to pile/mid span)
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page D.2 of 89
#REF!
#REF!
x1 = 1500 mm (distance of pile to center in x direction)

y1 = 750 mm (distance of pile to center in y direction)
Shear Section 1 (S1)

742 mm from center of P3& P6 ( d + dia/2 )
number of pile = 2 742 < x1 = 1500 mm
Vu = 367.14 kN (need to be calculated)
Ac = 1897000 mm2
Vu/Ac = 0.194 MPa
742 mm from center of P1,P2,P3 ( d + dia/2 )
number of pile = 3 742 < y1 = 750 mm
(need to be calculated)
Vu = 550.70 kN
Ac = 2710000 mm2
Vu/Ac = 0.203 MPa
742 mm from center of P4,P7 ( d + dia/2 )
Vu = 367.14 kN
Ac = 1897000 mm2
Vu/Ac = 0.194 MPa
742 mm from center of P6 ( d + dia/2 )
Vu = 183.57 kN
Ac = 474250 mm2
Vu/Ac = 0.387 MPa
Maximum ultimate shear stress = Vu1/Ac max = 0.387 MPa
D.3 Punching Shear

Footing is designed to resist punching shear at d/2 from outer skin of pile
de ca
d P1 P2 P3
Spun pile
d/2
cb
P4 P5 P6
Pile
Pseudocritical
section
Section at Edge Pilecap
Fig. D.2 Punching Shear Critical Area
Vu2max = 183.57 kN (for single pile)
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page D.3 of 89
#REF!
#REF!
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page D.4 of 89
#REF!
#REF!
Since there 3 type of pile applied, that is corner, edge and interior pile, the most critical type,
corner pile, will govern
Vc = k x fc'^0.5 x bo x d
while k shall be the smallest of:

1. (2 + 4/bc)/12 = 0.5
2. ((as d/bo) + 2)/12 = 0.60
3. 4/12 = 0.33
kused = 0.33
where :
Vc = shear strength provide by concrete
bc = ratio of long side to short side of pile or load (1 for circle area) = 1
as = constant, (20 for corner, 30 for edge, 40 for interior pile) = 20
d= Effective depth of footing 542 mm
de = edge pile to edge pilecap distance = 1200 mm
bo = Length of punching shear critical area = p(Dp + d) * as/40 = 2108.01 mm
437256598.xls
______________________________________________________________________________________
Page D.5 of 89
#REF!
#REF!
E. ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN

Y
0.576m
Bf
X
2m
0.576m
1.064m 1.5m 1.5m 0.973m Y
Lf 5m
*distances of anchor bolts follow vendor drawing Note : This sketch is for
Anchor Bolt ASTM A 307:
db = 5/8 in
= 16.00 mm
Ab = 201 mm2
Ft = 137.30 MPa
Fv = 68.6 MPa
n = 6.00 ea
min distance to edge (E) = 150 mm
min bolt pitch (F) = 57 mm
min bolt embedment (Le) = 480 mm
Modulus shape of anchor bolts:
Anchor bolt ni xi ni.xi2 Anchor bolt ni yi ni.yi2

Coordinate (m) (m2) Coordinate (m) (m2)
2.00 -1.473 2.170 3.00 0.576 0.332
2.00 0.027 0.001 3.00 0.576 0.332
2.00 1.527 2.332 Σni = 6.00 Σni.Yi2 = 0.664
Σni = 6.00 Σni.xi2 = 4.502 Zpy = Σni.Yi2 / Yi (max) = 1.15
Zpx = Σni.xi2 / xi (max) = 2.95
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page E.1 of 89
_________
#REF!
#REF!
Unfactored Load Combination

Axial Hx Hy My Mx
Load Combination
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm)
2-1 786.72 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
2-2 786.72 8.13 0.00 48.2 0.0
2-3 786.72 0.00 14.86 0.0 26.3
2-4 786.72 156.28 0.00 506.3 0.0
2-27 442.14 0.00 0.00 104.5 243.9
2-28 442.14 0.00 0.00 -104.5 243.9
2-29 442.14 0.00 0.00 104.5 -243.9
2-30 442.14 0.00 0.00 -104.5 -243.9
To determine anchor bolt axial and horizontal forces, the formula below shall be used:
- Anchor bolt axial force due to axial and momen about X axis
My
Zpy
- Anchor bolt axial force due to axial and momen about Z axis
Py
- Anchor bolt lateral force due to horizontal force at Z direction

Hy
Hoy
- Anchor bolt lateral force due to horizontal force at X direction
Anchor bolt axial force due to unfactored load combination axial and moment
Axial / ∑n My/Zpy Mx/Zpx

Load Combination
(kN) (kN) (kN)
2-1 131.12 0.00 0.00
2-2 131.12 41.80 0.00
2-3 131.12 0.00 8.93
2-4 131.12 439.48 0.00
2-27 73.69 90.75 82.74
2-28 73.69 -90.75 82.74
2-29 73.69 90.75 -82.74
2-30 73.69 -90.75 -82.74
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page E.2 of 89
_________
#REF!
#REF!
Combined single anchor bolt forces due to unfactored load combination
Px (kN) Pz (kN)
Load Combination
Max Min Max Min
2-1 131.12 131.12 131.1 131.1
2-2 131.12 131.12 172.9 89.3
2-3 140.05 122.19 131.1 131.1
2-4 131.12 131.12 570.6 -308.4
2-27 156.43 -9.04 164.4 -17.1
2-28 156.43 -9.04 -17.1 164.4
2-29 -9.04 156.43 164.4 -17.1
2-30 -9.04 156.43 -17.1 164.4
Pmax = 570.60 kN (Status : Compression)

Pmin = -308.36 kN (Status : Tension)
There is tension, so bolt shall be designed to resist tension and horizontal forces.
Anchor bolt lateral force due to unfactored load combination

Hoy Hox fv
Load Combination
(kN) (kN) (kN)
2-1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-2 0.00 1.35 6.74
2-3 2.48 0.00 12.32
2-4 0.00 26.05 129.55
2-27 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-28 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-29 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hoz max = 2.48 kN

Hox max = 26.05 kN
Maximum horizontal load on each pad during shutdown level (Assumed):

Hz max = 5.12 kN
Hx max = 5.12 kN
H max = 26.05 kN
Bolt shear capacity = Ab x Fv
= 201.06 x 68.6
= 13.7927 kN
Shear SF = 0.52953 < 1…Not OK
437256598.xls
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Page E.3 of 89
_________

LG001 Csa Cal 026

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

LG001 Csa Cal 026

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

#REF!

Nama Posisi Tanggal Tanda Tangan

TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE

1.0 GENERAL PARAMETER 3

1.2 Codes, Standards, and References

1.4 Quality of Material

- Water shall be clean potable water and free from

f'c_l Compression strength for leveling concrete 14.0 MPa

Reinforcing bar ASTM A615 or JIS G3112 SR 390/40 or SII

Precast Prestressed Concrete Spun Pile JIS A 5335 or

Epoxy Grouting ASTM C579

Non Shrink Grouting ASTM C1107

1.5 Unit Weight of Material

Symbol Materials Value Unit

γc Reinforced Concrete 23.54 kN/m3

Permanent 735.89 441.53 62.11

Temporary, increase 33% 978.73 573.99 80.74

Note : Qtens = 0.6 x Qcomp

(Refer to attachment A for detail)

Condition Qcomp Qtens Qlat

2.1. Dead Load (D)

2.2. Equipment Load (E)

2.3. Wind Load (W)

2.3.1. Site condition impacted to wind load

- Equipment shape : = Chimney, Tanks and Similar Structure in square (Ref.2)

Height equipment above ground level = 5.429 m

2.4. Earthquake Load (EQ)

- Occupancy category = "Essential Facilities".

2.4.2 Rigidity of structure

2.4.3 Design seismic coefficient based on static force procedure

ding appurtenances and it is clasiffied as empty load E(E), operating load

3.1 Factored load combinations

1-1 1.4 D + 1.4 E(E)

3.2 Unfactored load combination

2-1 1.0 D + 1.0 E(E)

4.2. Foundation Dimension Design

Note : This sketch is for

F_f Footing weight = 247.17 kN

Vol_fp Concrete volume = 10.50 m3

4.3. Pile Arrangement

Check spacing between piles >= 3 Dp

4.4.1.1 Live Load

Live Load = 1 * 2.1 * 3.84 * 5 kN/m2

4.4.2 Equipment Load (E)

4.4.3 Wind Load (W)

Civil calculation (in both X and Y dir.)

Govern wind force (in both X and Y dir.)

L Length of skid equipment = 3.84 m

4.4.4 Earthquake Load (EQ)

Civil Calculation (in both X and Y dir.)

Vopx Base shear in operating cond' in X dir.

Govern base shear

EQox Base shear in operating cond' in X dir. = 107.57 kN (Govern V op)

Mqex Moment due to EQ in empty cond' in X dir.

4.6. Load Combination Calculation

Dynamic Soil Properties

Y Note : This sketch is for

P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12

1.9m 1.9m 0.95 0.95 1.9m 1.9m

Stiffness & Damping for Pile Group And Pilecap

Rf equivalent radius of pilecap 7.74 ft

Symbol Description Value Unit Remarks