Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Bachelor of Science in Architecture (BS Arch.

)
COURSE SYLLABUS
2019 Curriculum

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Name of Course (Descriptive Course Number Semester and Year Credit Units and Pre-Requisite
Title) Level Offered Student Learning Time
(SLT)

1st Semester
History of Architecture 1 AR1161 2 Units: 38 Hours none
1st Year

6. Course Description
This course is a survey of the historic development of Man’s built structures and environment from the barbaric splendor of the first civilizations to the massive,
articulated architecture of the Byzantine period: including prehistoric Architecture; the preclassical civilizations of the Ancient Near East & Egypt, the Classical age
of the Greece & Rome; and the first half of Medieval Architecture - Early Christian, and Byzantine. The course will explore the architectural manifestation of
thoughts from the beginning of the civilization until the Byzantine period.

7. School’s Vision and Mission


The School of Engineering and Architecture envisions itself as an exemplary educational institution for engineering and architecture dedicated to elevating
instruction, research, and extension to a higher level of competence and creativity committed to shaping the socio-technical environment founded on Christian
values.

8. Program Educational Objectives (PEO)


 The BS Architecture Program shall produce graduates who are able to do the following three to five years after graduation:

 PEO 1 (COMPETENCE): perform standard competencies anchored on the philosophy and fundamentals of the multi-dimensional aspects of architecture
according to local and global practices showing traits of professionalism and sense of responsibility;
 PEO 2 (CHRISTIAN SPIRIT): apply their talents and full potential in the practice of their profession guided by the Christian tenets of honesty, service,
dedication and a deep sense of moral responsibility;
 PEO 3 (CREATIVITY): impart architectural technology that will foster new ideas, innovations and knowledge through scientific research vital to national
progress and development; and
 PEO 4 (SOCIAL INVOLVEMENT): focus the thrust of architecture education to the needs and demands of the society and its integration into social,

9. Relevant Program Learning Outcomes (PLO’s)

1
10. Course Learning Plan, and Constructive Alignment

 Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) describe the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values (KSAVs) that students are expected to demonstrate upon completion of the course, and Topic Learning
Outcomes
As a result of their(TLOs) describeexperiences
educational the KSAVs thatatstudents are expectedProgram,
the Architecture to demonstrate upon completion
graduates should of beeach
abletopic
to: level.
PLOTarget statements written as m/n specifies m percent of the class obtaining at least
4: Develop a creative and comprehensive understanding of building techniques and n percent of the total score for each of the assessment
technologies methods.to architecture.
in relation
PLO 5: Apply research techniques as an inherent part of architectural learning.
PLO 7:Course
Recognize the relationship between people and buildings, and between buildings andStudent
Learning
Teaching
their environment, andandof the need to relate
Assessment
PLO Topic Learning Outcome Topic Outline Learning Learning Target
buildings and the spaces between them to human needs and scale.
Outcome
Time Activities (TLAs)
Methods
PLO 8: Promote architecture as an imperative for an enhanced society through culture and the arts.
PRELIMINARY PERIOD

TLO 1: Understand the importance of the historical  Program and Course 2 hours
PLO4  Lecture  Attendance  100
foundation of architecture; Orientation Aug 5-7
CLO 1: understand
the evolution of TLO 2: Describe the architectural character of the  Lecture  Seatwork
4 hours  70/50
PLO5 architecture from the Prehistoric Period in terms of the common type of  PREHISTORIC Period  Readings  Plate
structures and elements;
Aug 12-21  70/50
Prehistoric to the  Research
Byzantine Period;
TLO 3: Describe the architectural character of the  Seatwork
4 hours  Lecture  70/50
Egyptian Period in terms of the common type of  RSPlate
PLO7  EGYPT Aug 21 to  Readings  70/50
CLO 2 : distinguish a structures and elements and the factors that  RSWork
Sep 4  Research  70/50
particular architectural influenced this style;
style from another; TLO 4 : Describe the architectural character of the
 Lecture  Seatwork  70/50
Middle Eastern Period in terms of the common type of  MIDDLE EAST to 4 hours
PLO8  Readings  RSPlate  70/50
structures and elements and the factors that megaliths Sep 9-18
influenced this style;  Research  RSWork  70/50
Prelim Examination  70/50
MIDTERM PERIOD

PLO4 TLO 5 : Describe the architectural character of the


CLO 1: understand 7 hours  Lecture  Seatwork  70/50
Greek Period in terms of the common type of
the evolution of  GREECE Sep 23 to  Readings  RSPlate  70/50
structures and elements and the factors that
PLO5 architecture from the Oct 14  Research  RSWork  70/50
influenced this style;
Prehistoric to the
Byzantine Period;
PLO7 CLO 2 : distinguish a TLO 6 : Describe the architectural character of the
7 hours  Lecture  Seatwork  70/50
particular architectural Roman Period in terms of the common type of
 The ROMAN Empire Oct 16 to  Readings  RSPlate  70/50
style from another; structures and elements and the factors that
PLO8 Nov 6  Research  RSWork  70/50
influenced this style;

Midterm Examination  70/50

FINAL PERIOD
CLO 1: understand
PLO4 the evolution of
architecture from the TLO 7 : Describe the architectural character of the
7 hours  Lecture  Seatwork  70/50
Prehistoric to the Early Christian and Byzantine Period in terms of the  Early Christian &
Nov 11 to  Readings  RSPlate  70/50
Byzantine Period; common type of structures and elements and the BYZANTINE
PLO5 Dec 2  Research  RSWork  70/50
CLO 2 : distinguish a factors that influenced this style;
particular architectural 2
style from another;
CLO 3 : make a
comparative analysis TLO 7 : Distinguish the architectural elements and
3 hours  Comparative  Tabulated
PLO8 of the architectural building types that best exemplify each period or style  CAPSTONE Project
Dec 4-11 Analysis SUMMARY
 70/50
styles during the covered from Prehistoric to Byzantine;
10. Capstone Project (If Applicable)

The project will require each student to make a compilation of their research papers and research plates from the Prehistoric to the Byzantine Periods. The student then performs a content analysis of the
compilation from which architectural elements and building types that characterize the style for each period is drawn out. The data derived from the comparative analysis will be tabulated according to PLANS,
WALLS, OPENINGS, ROOFS, COLUMNS, MOULDINGS, ORNAMENT, BUILDING EXAMPLE and a CONCLUDING STATEMENT on the overall architectural character according to the following periods learned:
PREHISTORIC, EGYPT, MIDDLE EAST, GREECE, ROMAN EMPIRE, BYZANTINE. The tabulated summary must be computer generated in word format and printed on A4 bond paper, an electronic copy of which
must be submitted to the professor.

11. Rubric for Capstone Project (If Applicable)

Criteria 10 8 6 4 2
The compilation of plates, The compilation of plates, The compilation of plates, The compilation of plates, The compilation of plates,
Completeness research papers and summary research papers and summary is research papers and summary is research papers and summary research papers and summary is
is complete. 80% complete. 60% complete. is 40% complete. 20% complete.
Very accurately illustrates and Accurately illustrates and Illustrates and identifies the Illustrates and identifies the Illustrates and identifies the
Accuracy identifies the elements for each identifies the elements for each elements for each period with elements for each period with elements for each period with
period. period. moderate accuracy. poor accuracy. very poor accuracy.
Writes a specific and clear Writes a moderately specific and Writes a poorly crafted Writes a concluding statement
Writes an excellent concluding
concluding statement on the clear concluding statement on concluding statement on the that do not match the
Conclusion statement on the architectural
architectural character of each the architectural character of architectural character of each architectural character of each
character of each period.
period. each period. period. period.
Images, texts and format of the Images, texts and format of the Images, texts and format of the Images, texts and format of the
Images, texts and format of the
Presentation table is very organized and well table is moderately organized table is poorly organized and table do not conform to
table is organized and balanced.
balanced. and balanced. balanced. prescribed standards.

12. Grading System


Assessment Methods Preliminary Period Midterm Period Final Period
Research - paper and plates 40% 40% 40%
Seatworks 10% 10% 10%
Major Exam 50% 50% 50%
Total 100% 100% 100%
Final Grade = ( 30% Prelim) + (30% Midterm) + (40% Final)

13. Course- Level Curriculum Map

Program Outcomes Program Educational Objectives

3
Course Learning Outcomes PO4 PO5 PO7 PO8 PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4

CLO 1: understand the evolution of architecture from the Prehistoric to the Byzantine Period; I D I I I I I I
CLO 2 : distinguish a particular architectural style from another; E D I I I I I I
CLO 3 : make a comparative analysis of the architectural styles during the periods covered; E D I E I I I I

Legend: I- Introductory E- Enabling D- Demonstrative

14. References (At least 5 References in APA format)

a) Cruickshank, Dan. (1996). Sir Banister Fletcher’s A History of Architecture, 20th edition. Architectural Press.
b) Ching, Francis DK; Jarzombek, Mark M.; Prakash, Vikramaditya. (2008). A Global History of Architecture. Wiley.
c) Ching, Francis DK. (2011). A Visual Dictionary of Architecture. Wiley.
d) Palmes, J.C. (1975). Sir Banister Fletcher’s A History of Architecture, 18th edition. Athlone Press: London.
e) Stierlin, Henri. (1998). Encyclopedia of World Architecture. Taschen.

Prepared By: Reviewed by: Noted and Endorsed by:

Ar. MARIA CRISELDA PEREZ-SORIANO Ar. MELISSA ANN C. PATANO Dr. CYNTHIA L. POSADAS

Faculty Department Head Dean


Architecture Department Architecture Department School of Engineering and Architecture

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen