DR.

KALOJI NARAYANA RAO UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

WARANGAL- TELANGANA STATE - 506007.

PROFORMA FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR DISSERTATION.

1.
NAME OF THE CANDIDATE AND Dr. AKULA SARIKA
ADDRESS HNO: 5-32; RAIGIRI RAILWAY STATION;
RAIGIRI (POST);BHONGIRI(MANDAL);
YADADRI BHONGIRI(DISTRICT);
PINCODE: 508116.

PH: 8790427745
2.
NAME OF THE INSTITUTION PANINEEYA MAHAVIDYALAYA INSTITUTE OF
AND ADDRESS DENTAL SCIENCES
ROAD NO: 5, KAMALANAGAR
DILSUKHNAGAR,
HYDERABAD - 500060

3.
COURSE OF STUDY AND
MASTERS OF DENTAL SURGERY(MDS);
SPECIALITY
CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS
.

4.
DATE OF ADMISSION TO THE 05-June-2017
COLLEGE

5.
TITLE OF THE TOPIC COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FRACTURE
RESISTANCE OF PREMOLAR TEETH RESTORED
WITH AMALGAM, FIBER REINFORCED
COMPOSITES, ZIRCONOMER , AND CENTION N
-AN IN VITRO STUDY.

6.
BRIEF RESUME OF
STUDY/INTENDED WORK:
Operative dentistry has traditionally combined the removal of
carious tissue with concomitant cavity preparation. Teeth with
cavity -preparation becomes weak as the occlusal isthmus is
widened, and they fracture more easily than do intact teeth. Mesio
-occluso -distal cavity preparation brings about a significant
reduction in tooth strength due to the loss of marginal ridges and
microfractures caused by applied occlusal forces. Occlusally
applied loads may tend to force cusps apart and in teeth with wide
Class II cavities, a fracture of the cusps occurs as a result of
fatigue of the brittle tooth structure by propagation of micro
cracks under repeated loading. Fracture resistance is one of the
most important characteristics of dental materials. It depends on
material resistance to crack propagation from its internal
defects .The clinical performance of the newer dental materials
has been significantly improved over the past decade to provide
adequate strength and resistance in order to withstand the forces of
mastication
A) NEEDS AND Aim of the study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of premolar
OBJECTIVES OF THE
MOD cavity preparation by using different restorative materials.
STUDY:
Objectives of the study:
1. To determine the fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored
with cention N.
2. To determine the fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored
with fiber reinforced composite.
3. To determine the fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored
with zirconomer.
B)REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
1. Mathew BP, Hegde MN, Hegde P (2006).Evaluated fracture
resistance of molars with class II bonded amalgam restorations.
Teeth restored with amalgam and varnish, excite, adhese and
clearfill liner bond 2V.All teeth restored with bonded amalgam
restorations significantly improved fractured resistance. Teeth
restored with bonded amalgam restorations using clearfill liner
bond fractured at a higher mean compressive load.

2.Solomon P, Krishna G, Parameswaran A, Pradeep G,

Kandaswamy D(2007). Compared fracture resistance of
premolars teeth with class II preparation restored with light cured
composite with beta quartz inserts , light cured composite and
silver amalgam in comparison with intact unrestored teeth ,
fracture resistance of light cured composite placed in alternating
oblique layers is greater than light cured composite incrementally
placed in horizontal layers and unrestored teeth and fracture
resistance of light cure composite with beta quartz inserts and high
copper silver is higher than unrestored intact teeth.
3. Akbarian G, Ameri H, Chasteen J. E,Ghavamnasiri M
(2014). Evaluated fracture resistance of premolar teeth with
silorane based or dimethacrylate based composite resin. Silorane
based composite showed a resistance to fracture similar to
methacrylate based composite regardless of whether cavity liners
were used.

4. Vanishree H, M Shanthala, B, Bobby, W. (2015).

Compared fracture resistance and micro leakage in bonded
amalgam, amalgam and composite resin in primary molar, bonded
amalgam appears to be comparable to amalgam when micro
leakage is considered and to composite resin when fracture
resistance is considered, hence bonded amalgam can also be an
alternative material to amalgam in primary molars.
7. MATERIALS AND Preparation of samples :
METHODS:
Ninety sound human maxillary premolars extracted for
orthodontic reasons are selected .Then specimen will be initially
stored in saline solution and immersed in a 0.1% thymol solution
for 24 hours prior to onset of the experiment.

Inclusion criteria: freshly extracted, intact teeth for orthodontic

and periodontic reasons.

Exclusion criteria: cracks, fluorosis, hypo calcifications.

Total specimens are divided into six groups each (n=15) as

described below:

Control groups:
1.Group 1:intact premolars (positive control)
2.Group 2:unrestored prepared tooth(negative control)
Experimental groups:
3. Group 3: mesio-occluso-distal cavity preparation will be done
and restored with amalgam.
4. Group 4: mesio-occluso-distal cavity preparation will be done
and restored with fiber reinforced composite.
5. Group 5: mesio -occluso-distal cavity preparation will be done
and restored with zirconomer.
6. Group 6: mesio-occluso-distal cavity preparation will be done
and restored with cention N.
 All specimens will be thermo cycled for 1000-
Cycles (5 - 55˚c, dwell time, 15sec); They will be subjected to
compressive axial loading with a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in
a universal testing machine using a steel bar which will be placed
center to the occlusal surface and applied parallel to the long axis
of the teeth and to the slopes of the cusps and restoration and all
statistical values will be recorded and data will be analysed.

B) DOES YOUR STUDY

REQUIRE ANY NO
INVESTIGATION OR
INTERVENTION TO BE
CONDUCTED ON HUMANS
OR ANIMALS? IF SO,
PLEASE DESCRIBE
BRIEFLY

C) HAS ETHICAL
CLEARANCE BEEN
OBTAINED FROM YOUR
INSTITUTION
 1. Mathew BP, Hegde MN, Hegde P. Fracture resistance of bonded
8. LIST OF REFERENCES:
amalgam class ii Amalgam restorations an invitro study. Journal of
conservative dentistry. 2006; 9:43-7.

2.Solomon P, Krishna G, Parameswaran A, Pradeep G,

Kandaswamy D. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth with class II
preparation restored with cured composite with the betaquartz
inserts ,light cured composite and silver amalgam in comparsion
with intact unrestored teeth –An in vitro study.Journal of
conservative dentistry.2007;10(4):122-28.

3. Coelho-desouza F.H, Camacho G.B, DemarcoF.F, and

PowersJ.M. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD
restoration: influence of restorative technique, Bevel Preparation
and Water Storage. Operative Dentistry: January 2008; 33(1):37-
43.

4. Akbarian, G., Ameri, H., Chasteen, J. E. and Ghavamnasiri, M,

Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Silorane-
Based or Dimethacrylate-Based Composite Resins. J Esthet Restor
Dent.2014; 26: 200–07.

5. Vanishree H, Shanthala B, Bobby W. The comparative

evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage in bonded
amalgam, amalgam, and composite resins in primary molars.
Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2015; 26(5):446-50.
9. SIGNATURE OF
CANDIDATE :
10.
REMARKS OF THE GUIDE:

11. NAME AND DESIGNATION OF

THE GUIDE/CO GUIDE AND
THE HEAD OF THE
DEPARTMENT (IN BLOCK
LETTERS)

A)GUIDE DR.UMRANA FAIZUDDIN MDS (PROFESSOR).

B)SIGNATURE

C)CO-GUIDE DR.ASHISH JAIN MDS (SENIOR LECTURER).

D)SIGNATURE

E) HEAD OF THE DR.P.KARUNAKAR.(PROFESSOR & HOD)

DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY AND
ENDODONTICS.
PANINEEYA MAHAVIDYALAYA INSTITUTE OF
DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTER,
ROAD NO-5, KAMALANAGAR,
DILSUKHNAGAR,
HYDERABAD-500060, TELANGANA.

F) SIGNATURE
12. A)REMARKS OF THE
PRINCIPAL

B)SIGNATURE