Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ANALYSIS
Group 3
Deepesh Gupta (1511319)
Jitendra Kumar Singh (1511325)
Smruti Ranjan Panda (1511362)
Soumya Ranjan Sahoo (1511364)
Rakshith K N (1511346)
Soumya Ranjan Sahoo
1. INTRODUCTION
Shouldice Hospital Limited is a healthcare facility located in the suburbs of Toronto, Canada. The
17,000 square foot facility is housed on a sprawling 130 acre estate and specializes in repairing
external abdominal hernias. It has 89 beds and 6,850 operations are performed on patients (in
year 1982) from all across the United States and Canada. Founded by Dr. Earle Shouldice in 1940,
the organization enjoys a reputation for effectively using a unique surgical technique to repair
external hernias that is considered superior to all others. The procedure includes early
ambulation following surgery for rapid and effective recovery. The organization takes great pride
in its “patient as boss” philosophy of service.
2. BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Shouldice hospital has been successful in different aspects ranging from employee satisfaction to
customer satisfaction to efficiency and quality of service offerings. One can gauge the success of
the business by looking at the oversubscription rate in spite of lack of advertisement. The
performance can be measured quantitatively (in terms of profit margins, capacity utilization etc.)
as well as qualitatively (in terms of patients and physician satisfaction).
Service offerings
Employee management
Customer management
Each of the above elements have been evaluated in detail in the below sections.
Shouldice Hospital has managed to maintain high quality in its operation and post-operations
activities. Some of the quality control is reflected in the below scenarios.
1) The recruitment process is rigorous in order to make sure Shouldice hire experience
physicians who are flexible i.e. ready to adopt Shouldice method of operation. One of the
important parameters is to understand the motivation of the physician to work at
Shouldice. Generally, physicians value work-life balance (as they are married ) and are
relatively less ambitious
2) There is a low recurrent rate of external Hernia based on the Shouldice operations
method. This is an indication of the high quality of operation by highly skilled surgeons
3) The food is prepared in house to ensure the quality control. The control on the quality is
internal and there is no dependency on the external contractor
Hence with high quality control, Shouldice has been able to improve patient’s experience as well
as control the costs.
2.1.1.2 Efficient and cost effective process flow
Apart from quality control, there has been other initiatives that Shouldice has undertaken to
reduce the overall cost for the patients and maintain an efficient flow for operations.
Although surgeons tend to do similar kind of operation throughout their life, the recruitment
policy is made such that the doctors recruited are fine with this kind of environment. Doctors
with families are recruited which would like to have work-life balance rather than more ambitious
doctors.
1. Patients are encouraged to talk to the already operated patients in order to listen to their
experience that could potentially lead to reduction of anxiety
2. Parents accompanying the children are allowed to stay for free. Apart from reducing the
nursing cost, this makes both child and parent happier as they are always near each other
3. After operations, patients were encouraged to walk to the wheel chair, they can start
exercising the same day, even climb stairs. All these were done to reduce the feeling of
‘patient’ and instill the feeling that patients have control over his life and is not control of
the disease. This shaped patients’ attitude
Shouldice also hosts alumni dinners for patients operated at Shouldice. Most of the patients in
the alumni reunion seems to be mention that Shouldice experience did not feel like a hospital.
This is an evidence for a great patient friendly hospital that has led to its success. Patients have
been very willing to refer other patients to Shouldice and this has in turn made the marketing
redundant.
Normal charges +
Total charges for critical operation 1029
anaesthetic
Assume5 % of total
No. of critical operations per day 0.05*33 1.65
operations
95% of total
No. of regular operations per day 0.95*33 31.35
operations
5 days/week
No of Working Days Per Month 5*4 20
currently
Daily income*Total
TOTAL YEARLY REVENUE 33833.25*20*12 8.12 Million
days
Total salaries paid per year (USD)
Full Time Surgeons 12 @ $50k salary + 500k bonus pool 12*50k+500k 1,100,000
51% of $60/surgery; 33
Part Time Surgeons operations/day; 20 days/month, 12 0.51*60*33*20*12 242,352
months/year
TOTAL 2.28Mn
Hospital 2.8Mn
Clinic 2Mn
Total 4.8Mn
No of hours the full time surgeons are available for service/day = 12*8 = 96
No of usable hours of full time surgeons/day = Operating hours per day + Consulting
hours/day*no of surgeons
= (33*1) + (6*2)
= 45 hours
(assumed 30 operations per day, duration of 1 operation considered 1 hr as given in case;
assumed 6 doctors consulting from 1 pm to 3 pm every day, total usable hours for consultancy is
12 hours)
Capacity utilization of doctors= 45/96 = 46.87%............................................................... (B)
2.2.2.2 Operation theatre:
1. The narrow focus on operating external Hernia has allowed Shouldice to gain expertise in
that area and focus on holistic care of the patients.
2. They train the incoming physicians to follow a specific approach to operate external
Hernias
3. Theory of swift even flow suggests that the productivity for any process—be it labor
productivity, machine productivity, materials productivity, or total factor productivity—
rises with the speed by which materials (or information) flow through the process, and it
falls with increases in the variability associated with the flow, be that variability associated
with quality, quantities, or timing. This is applicable for Shouldice hospital as it focus on
niche strategy (with less variability) and quality, hence its process flow is efficient.
2.3 Challenges
In the current scenario, the main problem of Shouldice hospital is whether to increase its capacity
or not. And if yes, which way should it do. It has following five options to expand the capacity:
The analysis for all the four scenarios has been done below and a final recommendation is
provided for the growth strategy of the Shouldice.
2.4 Analysis
2.4.1 Scenario 1: Expand with an additional floor
Assumption
In this solution, the capacity utilization of Shouldice hospital has been considered. There are
many resources used in Shouldice hospital which comprises of a fixed cost and variable cost. The
resources responsible for variable cost are doctors, assistant doctors, anaesthetist, nurses, house
keepers, other employees etc. The total operating cost of the hospital in year 1983 was 4.8 million
collectively for both hospital and clinic.
As from our earlier analysis, from (B) and (C), we know that the capacity utilization of working
hours of full time surgeons and operating theatre is 46.87% and 82.5% respectively.
The profit margin as calculated in (A) is $3.32 million.
Proposed solution:
The number of beds in the hospital currently is 89. Approximating the number to 90 ( for
calculation ease), and considering the fact that every patient is discharged on 4th day morning, at
any given time the maximum bed occupied will be 90 if, every day at an average 30 patients are
operated.
With increasing in the number of beds by 50%, total number of beds will be = 90*1.5 = 145
Additional fixed cost incurred= $2000000 (1)
No of patients to be operated on daily basis = 145/3 = 48.33 = approximately 48
Hence there has to be increase in no of operating theatre by 1 number, making it total of 6
theatres operating 8 hours a day, hence total no of operations = 48
In case of any emergency or issue in any operation theatre, and additional operation theatre can
be built to share the operating load.
Therefore, increase in fixed cost due to 2 additional operation theatre = 2*$30000
= $60000 (2)
Increase in salary of employees for the new set up:
No of surgeries per day= 48
Total no of surgeries per year in 50 weeks = (48*5*50) = 12000
Taking average number of surgeries as per previous capacity per day = 33
Total no of surgeries per year as per previous set up in full capacity = 33*5*50 = 8250
Patient registration on 1st day:
With the new set up, the maximum number of patient registration has to be increased from 36
to 48, i.e further increase in (12*(20/60)) hours of usable time of full time surgeons. i.e 3.6 hours
(Assumption: The increase in no of registration is accommodated by shifting some of the patient
registration to morning shift without incurring any additional cost)
Full time surgeons:
There is no requirement of increasing no of full time surgeons. Total usable time of full time
surgeons = no of operating hours * no of consulting hours
48 + (no of patients*consulting time in hours)
= 48 + (48*(20/60) hours) = 64 hours
Capacity utilization of full time surgeons = 64/96 = 66.67 %
With a total of 7 assistant surgeons and 6 operating theatres, at any given time, there is an
assistant surgeon available for surgery. Capacity utilization of assistant surgeons =
No. of operating hours/ no of hours of availability
= 48/56
= 85.71%
As assistant surgeons are paid according to number of surgeries done, increase in cost incurred
by the hospital to accommodate their salary = (12000-8250)*$60*0.51= 11475 (3)
No of nurses at present = 17, no additional nurses required with increase in 1 operating theatre.
(Assumption: The same anesthetist is able to supply at the same price per day)
Profitability calculations:
Additional Cost incurred per year:
Additional Fixed Cost = $2000000 + $ 60000 = $ 2060000 (Assumption: depreciated with zero
residual value over 20 years)
Depreciating the fixed cost over 5 years, cost incurred in 1 year = $2060000/5= $ 412000
Additional variable cost per year for assistant surgeons = $ 114750
Total cost= $ 526750
Additional revenue incurred per year:
Increase in number of surgeries per year= (48-33)*50*5= 3750
Revenue from additional 3750 surgeries= (3750/8250)*8120000= $ 3690000
Net additional profit = $3690000-526750 = $3163250
Profit increases by almost 100%.
Hence this solution is profitable, and the fixed cost can be recovered within 1 year of operation.
Pros and Cons of the solution:
PROS CONS
Let’s check the feasibility of the option. Suppose there are around 15 patients per day who are
willing to choose the option. Then we can arrange the patient in such a way that we can maximise
the utilisation of the beds. For example, if on Friday the total patients who have undergone
treatment is 55 and for we are taking admission of 20 new patients for regular treatment. Then
the number of patients which can be accommodated for two days treatment will be 15. Similarly,
based on the maximisation of the admission, we have prepared a timetable as shown below.
Monday 20 20 20
Tuesday 20 20 20
Wednesday 20 20 20
Thursday 20 20 20
Friday
Saturday
Sunday 20 20 20
Total 40 60 60 60 60 20 0
Monday 15 15
Tuesday 15 15
Wednesday 15 15
Thursday 15 15
Friday 15 15
Saturday
Sunday
Total 15 30 30 30 30 15 0
Grant 55 90 90 90 90 35 0
In this way, we can accommodate 195 patients per week, which is 30% more than the current
patients. The calculation of the increased revenue is as follows
Hospital
Revenue
For 4 days accommodation (4x111x5200 per year) = 2308800
For 3 days accommodation (3x111x3900 per year) = 1298700
Cost = 2800000
Profit = 807500
Clinic
Revenue (450+60+75x0.2) x 9100 = 4777500
Cost = 2800000
Profit = 2777500
Net Profit = 3585000
So it has enormous potential to expand our services. But one may argue that the first day can
help the patient to become comfortable with the procedure. As they interact with other patients
who have been already undergone the operation. So reducing the first day may decrease their
comfort. However, we can also arrange the interaction between the patients during the day itself.
When the new patients are waiting for their sequence, then they can interact with the other
patients. So we can take care of this factor also.
There is possibility that it will be difficult to schedule the doctors as per their patients. For
example, if we change the shift of the doctors then it will be difficult for them to follow up with
their patients. However, it can be minimized by increasing interaction between the doctors. So
that they can know about their patient in case of shift change. Also, we can change their shift in
a phased manner. Like if there are 6 doctors in the shift A, then in next week we can shift 2
doctors from shift B to A and vice-versa.
Pros and Cons:
Pros Cons
1. It can increase the scale of 1) It can increase the work load to the
operations by 16.67%. So the doctors
revenue will also increase.
2) It unconventional to the existing work
1. Patient can go home in 3 days. culture of the hospital. Hence it may
Hence there will be huge demand of affect the perception of the patients
the service. about the hospital.
3) Maintaining the schedule of the doctors
2. Maximum utilization of the beds will be difficult.
PROS CONS
The new establishment requires
Nearer to patients’ location in USA, significant capital. This requires site of
travel to Canada just for Hernia about 17000-square foot, to bring up
operation can be avoided. new facility. Remunerations for doctors
With reduction in 42% of patients from and nurses would amount to $1.23
US, it can serve more patients (~3360 million.
patients) in Canada, and can start Quality of ‘The Shouldice method’ of
advertising. Thus can avoid misuse of operating Hernia may be hampered.
Shouldice name (Shouldice operation Monitoring and controlling its quality
technique) by its competitors. would be highly challenging.
Expanding their unique service to larger It would be really difficult to establish a
section of people, at lower cost than similar atmosphere and culture in US.
their competitors in US, as Shouldice Thus the patient’s experience would not
Hospital work on non-profit basis. be as good as at Toronto facility.
Reduces travel expense around
$1.35million, thus service is available at
a much lower cost for US patients.
As, travel to Toronto in mid-winter
season is often discouraged, patients
seeking immediate medical attention
can be treated in US only.
This will be a new opportunity for
existing personnel to work with new
experts at US and can benefit from the
transfer of knowledge and culture. Also
can improve on the existing successful
procedure.
Pros Cons
Difficult to maintain proper control over
Serve more people, and provide quality of individual services and
additional facilities at one place on administration becomes more complex,
non-profit basis, which is a great social as Shouldice’s expertise is limited to
contribution. Hernia operations.
Increases profits. Requires new specialist surgeons, to
drive new services. Thus, it is difficult to
hire new experts who would render
their service for non-profitable cause.
Requires new investment for setting up
facilities and promotional activities.
Advertisements are needed to bring
awareness about the additional services
available at Shouldice.
The existing staff has limited flexibility,
hence surgeons may not show interest
to be cross trained in new
specializations.
Recommendation:
Based on the above analysis, it is recommended that Shouldice hospital can either go with Scenario 1 or
Scenario 2 for expansion. In scenario 1, though there is a huge capital investment, the money can be
recovered within 1 year with an approximate additional 100% profit without reducing quality of services.
In scenario 2, the service can be expanded without any additional resource requirement. Though in this
case there may be an issue with the quality of service as the number of days for treatment is proposed to
reduce by 1 day. In this case we have assumed that reduction in number of days won’t reduce the service
quality level.
We don’t recommend to adopt scenario 3 i.e converting Saturday into a working day, as surgeons don’t
seem to be interested in this proposal. Implementing it might affect the performance of the surgeons and
thus the quality of services provided will get degraded.
Scenario 4 is discarded as huge amount of capital cost is required. Secondly, maintaining the same work
culture and service level at a far off place will be a big challenge.
Scenario 5 is not recommended as with increase in the number of health services, there is a greater chance
that the quality of service will reduce as Shouldice hospital staffs and surgeons don’t have enough
expertise in these fields.