Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

T h e D h a r w a r craton, s o u t h e r n India, and its Late A r c h a e a n

plate t e c t o n i c setting: current interpretations and


controversies

BRIAN CHADWICK*, V N VASUDEV @and G V HEGDEt


* Earth Resources Centre, University, Exeter EX~ 4QE, UK
120/~5(A) III Block, Thyagarajanagar, Bangalore 560 028, India
t Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Karnataka, Bangalore 560 027, India

In spite of detailed geological investigations of the Dharwar craton since the 1890s, its principal
lithological units, structure and chronology remain contentious. Important new work on lithostrati-
graphy, basin development, structure, geochemistry and geochronology has led to wide-ranging
speculation on the Late Archaean plate tectonic setting. Much of the speculation is based on
uniformitarian models which contrast with a recent proposal that the evolution of the craton was
controlled by gravity-driven processes with no crustal shortening.

1. T h e D h a r w a r c r a t o n The craton can be subdivided into two principal


parts (figure 1) which are separated by a steep belt of
The Late Archaean Dharwar craton (figure 1), in the mylonites, c l - l . 5 k m wide, trending approximately
sense of Ramakrishnan (1993), is an important part of N-S or NW-SE (Chadwick et al 1989). The belt of
the collage of Archaean and Proterozoic terrains in mylonites has been interpreted as a thrust by many
Peninsular India. Areas east and south of the craton workers on the grounds of a relatively shallow,
are characterized by structures, metamorphism and easterly dipping reflector identified by Kaila et al
igneous bodies related to the Pan-African assembly of (1979), but there is no obvious curvature along the
Gondwana, but the interior of the craton largely length of its outcrop to suggest that the steep mylo-
escaped significant Pan-African overprinting. The nites are part of a listric structure. Shallow and
northern margin of the craton is concealed by steeply plunging linear fabrics in the mylonites
Proterozoic sedimentary rocks and the Deccan lavas, (Chadwick et al 1989) are ambiguous in terms of the
whereas the east is overlain by the Meso-Neoproter- principal displacement direction within the belt.
ozoic Cuddapah basin. Late Archaean metamorphism
in much of the western part of the craton varies from
LT greenschist to amphibolite facies in contrast with
2. W e s t e r n p a r t o f t h e c r a t o n
HT greenschist to amphibolite facies in the eastern
part which is related to the emplacement of volumi-
2.1 Peninsular Gneiss and the Sargur Group
nous granite. Effects and possible causes of Late
Archaean granulite facies metamorphism in the West of the mylonite belt the craton is characterized
extreme south of the craton have been reviewed by by Late Archaean volcanic and sedimentary rocks
Hansen et al (1995), among others. This contribution (Dharwar Supergroup; Swami Nath et al 1976) that
comprises a brief review of recent findings in the were deposited in the period c2900-2600 Ma (Taylor
Dharwar craton north of the terrain affected by et a11984; Nutman et a11996; Kumar et a11996) on a
Archaean granulite facies metamorphism. sialic basement of orthogneisses and granodiorites

Keywords. Dharwar craton; Late Archaean; plate tectonics; Dharwar batholith.

Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), 106, No. 4, December 1997, pp. 249-258
9 Printed in India 249
250 Brian Chadwick et al

Taylor et al 1984; Bhaskar Rao et al 1991; Naha et al


1993; Peucat et a11993). Whereas much of the Penin-
sular Gneiss is part of a tonalite-trondhjemite-
granodiorite suite whose precursors had short periods
of crustal residence (Bhaskar Rao ct al 1983; Monrad
1983; Stroh et al 1983; Jayaram et al 1983; among
others), its tectonic evolution prior to c2900Ma is
poorly understood.
The gneisses include tracts of older volcanic and
sedimentary rocks and stratiform gabbro-anorthosite
complexes (Sargur Group; Swami Nath et al 1976).
SHRIMP and single grain evaporation ages of zircon
(Nutman et a11992; Ramakrishnan et a11994; Peucat
et al 1995) show that the Sargur Group has an age of
c2960-3300 Ma, and it includes detrital zircon grains
as old as 3580 Ma. It is likely that the Sargur Group
includes a number of different tracts of supracrustal
rocks of different ages. The Sargur Group includes
banded iron formations, fuchsite quartzites of detrital
origin (Chadwick et al 1986; Argast 1995), metape-
lites, basaltic amphibolites, metaperidotites and stra-
tiform gabbro-anorthosites: the depositional, volcanic
and tectonic setting remains unclear.
Deformation of the Sargur Group in the Hole-
narsipur belt (figure 1) took place in three distinct
Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the Late Archaean periods (Chadwick et a11978). Bouhallier et al (1993)
Dharwar craton (ornamented) in southern Peninsular India: argued that the structure of this belt was controlled
DS: Dharwar Supergroup; PG: Peninsular Gneiss (basement by diapiric emplacement of the adjacent components
to the Dharwar Supergroup); H: Holenarsipur schist belt, of the Peninsular Gneiss in amphibolite facies condi-
> c.3000Ma; m: steep belt of mylonites (see text); black: Late tions and subsequent sinistral transcurrent shearing in
Archaean volcano-sedimentary schist belts in the eastern part
of the craton (Hu: Hutti; K: Kolar; R: Ramagiri; S: Sandur); greenschist facies conditions. The diapiric emplace-
DB: Dharwar batholith; g: Late Archaean granulite facies ment appears to have taken place prior to c2900 Ma,
metamorphism; KA: Kibbanahalli Arm (see text). Blank areas whereas the sinistral shearing appears to be Late
are mostly Proterozoic and younger rocks, including Archaean. Chardon et al (1996) extended the diapiric
CB: Cuddapah basin; PSZ: Proterozoic shear zones; PAT: model to structures in the Peninsular Gneiss and
terrain dominated by Pan-African phenomena. B: Bangalore;
C: Chitradurga; Ma: Madras; My: Mysore; T: Trivandrum. Sargur rocks which underlie the Dharwar Supergroup
in the Kibbanahalli Arm (figure 1) west of the Chitra-
durga schist belt. They noted that orthogneisses are
which are known collectively as the Peninsular Gneiss. generally located in domes, whereas Sargur supra-
Many workers have included the younger Archaean crustal rocks are mainly found in intervening basins.
plutonic rocks in the eastern part of the craton as part This distribution contrasts with the common inter-
of the Peninsular Gneiss following W F Smeeth who sheeting of the gneisses and Sargur rocks elsewhere in
coined the term nearly a century ago. Because of the the western part of the craton, the intersheeting
confusions that have arisen with its application to having been due principally to intrusion of the
rocks with a wide range of ages (see Naha et al 1993; supracrustal rocks by precursors of the gneisses. The
Srinivasan and Naha 1996, for recent examples), intersheeted relationship suggests that a significant
Radhakrishna and Vaidyanadhan (1994) proposed sub-horizontal regime of plutonic intrusion and
that the term be abandoned. They suggested that the deformation characterized much of the Peninsular
term Older Gneiss Complex be used for gneisses older Gneiss before the generation of upright structures
than 3000 Ma, and Younger Gneiss Complex for those like those described by Bouhallier et al (1993) and
c2600 Ma. Because the younger gneisses are a high- Chardon et al (1996).
strain component of the Dharwar batholith which is
discussed later, we recommend that the term Penin-
2.2 Dha~war Supergroup
sular Gneiss be retained, but restricted to gneisses
older than c2900 Ma. Although the unconformable relationship between the
The basement orthogneisses and low-strain plutonic Dharwar Supergroup and its basement of Peninsular
rocks in the western part of the craton have ages in Gneiss is disputed by some workers (Naha et al 1993;
the range c2900-3300Ma (Beckinsale et al 1980; Srinivasan and Naha 1996), the field evidence south of
The D h a r w a r craton in southern India 251

Bababudan, north of Sigegudda, west of the Chitra- The second stage of basin development saw the
durga belt and on the west and east of the accumulation of alluvial and shallow marine fans,
Kibbanahalli Arm points overwhelmingly to an uncon- debris flows, quartz arenites, greywackes and local
formable relationship which shows that deposition of stromatolitic limestones, with sporadic basic and
the Dharwar Supergroup did not begin until cooling, acid volcanism. The coarse polymict conglomerates
uplift and peneplanation of the basement had taken in the alluvial fans and debris flows include not
place after c3000Ma (Swami Nath et al 1976). The only crowded clasts of Dharwar metabasalt, gabbro,
age of the Dharwar Supergroup is constrained to the banded iron formation and quartzite, but also
period c2900-2600 Ma on the grounds of the age of its orthogneisses which show that areas of basement
basement, intrusion of the Chitradurga Granite were elevated and eroded during basin development.
(2605 • 18 Ma; Taylor et a11984) and a Pb/Pb meta- The final stage was marked by deposition of a
morphic recrystallization age of 2639 • 32 Ma of lime- widespread, but relatively thin, banded iron formation
stones from various parts of the Dharwar stratigraphy which was followed by thick fine-grained greywackes
(Russell et al 1996). SHRIMP zircon age data from with intercalations of chert and volcanic rocks.
acid volcanic rocks at a relatively high stratigraphic The mixed-mode basin development and volcanic
level indicate melt crystallization at 2614• facies (Bhaskar Rao and Drury 1982; Drury 1983)
(Nutman et al 1996), whereas well constrained arrays suggest an incipient back-arc or an active continental
of Sm-Nd data interpreted as isochrons by Kumar margin, with similarities in the Mesozoic-Cenozoic
et al (1996) show that some of the oldest basic setting of New Zealand and the western United States
volcanic rocks in the supergroup are 2911 • (Chadwick et al 1992).
old and other volcanic suites low in the stratigraphic Interpretation of the Late Archaean structure of the
sequence are 2848 i 70Ma and 2747 • 15Ma old. Dharwar Supergroup and its sialic base~nent is
Isotopic whole rock ages of 2565 + 28Ma (Pb/Pb; controversial (Mukhopadhyay 1986). Naqvi (1973)
Taylor et a11984) and 2520 • 62 Ma (Rb-Sr; Bhaskar and Naha and Chatterjee (1982) took the view that
Rao et al 1992) for volcanic rocks high in the banded iron formations host early, large-scale isoclinal
stratigraphy and other younger ages for rocks else- folds that are refolded by younger structures. Drury
where in the stratigraphy (2240 • 50 Ma, Bhaskar Rao and Holt (1980) and Drury et al (1984) took a wider
et al 1992; 2439• Srinivasan et al 1992; view in the sense that they believed that the Dharwar
2480 • 31 Ma, Naha et al 1993) appear to be effects Supergroup is characterized by early E-W recumbent
of unspecified metamorphic disturbance. folds and thrusts propagated from the south which
Facies distributions and well-preserved primary were refolded by movements in wide N-S or NW-SE
depositional and volcanic structures in the Dharwar shear zones. However, their claims of large-scale
Supergroup in the central part of the western half of recumbent folds" are not supported by stratigraphic
the craton show that it was deposited in mixed-mode data. In contrast, Chadwick et al (1981a, 1985b, 1988,
basins whose evolution was probably controlled by 1989, 1992) interpreted the Dharwar schist belts in
transpression (Chadwick et al 1989, 1992). Future terms of one principal phase of deformation with
detailed stratigraphic studies combined with precise superimposed younger folds related to transcurrent
isotopic dating are likely to reveal that the supergroup sinistral displacements. Moreover, Mukhopadhyay
formed in a series of independent basins. and Ghosh (1983); Mukhopadhyay and Baral (1985)
Chadwick et al (1992) proposed that the Dharwar and Naha et al (1995) believed that the principal
Supergroup accumulated in three stages. The first was structures are the result of two distinct periods of
characterized by crustal extension which led to prolific deformation which gave rise to broadly parallel
eruption of basalts, emplacement of sub-volcanic upright folds or refolded recumbent folds.
gabbros, and deposition of shallow marine sands, i a h a et al (1986) and Naha et al (1990) made a
carbonaceous muds, volcaniclastic sediments and more controversial claim that the ductile migmatitic
banded iron formations (with major economic depos- structures in the Peninsular Gneiss of the basement
its of iron in the Kudremukh area). Koma~iites are a were contemporaneous with folds in the Dharwar
very minor component in the Dharwar Supergroup Supergroup: they referred to this relationship as a
compared with supracrustal belts of similar age in "unity of structures". However, their view is at
other continents. The basal quartz-pebble conglomer- variance with the fact that the low-grade Dharwar
ate at the unconformity with the Peninsular Gneiss Supergroup rests unconformably on folds that were
basement has been interpreted as fluvial by Srinivasan generated during high-grade migmatitic events in
and Ojakangas (1986) and Farreddudin et al (1988), the orthogneisses of its basement. They argued that
but shallow marine by Chadwick et al (1985a). The the basement was extensively remobilized during
presence of an unambiguous sialic basement to the deformation of the Dharwar Supergroup and the
Dharwar Supergroup is inconsistent with proposals by unconformities were 'blurred' (Naha et al 1991). The
Naqvi et al (1988), among others, that parts of the alleged blurring is inconsistent with the sharp uncon-
supergroup had a simatic basement. formities mapped by Chadwick et al (1981b, 1985a);
252 B r i a n Chadwick et al

Viswanatha et al (1982) and Venkata Dasu et al of steep, N-S shear zones which ramify through
(1991). The problem at the heart of the concept of the western part of the craton (see, for example,
unity of structures is compounded by the fact that, Chadwick ct al figure 3, 1988; Bouhallier et al figure 9,
following W F Smeeth, the definition of Peninsular 1993).
Gneiss used by Naha et al (1990), and more recently
by Srinivasan and Naha (1996), embraces orthogneis-
ses (> c2900 Ma) which are basement to the Dharwar 3. E a s t e r n p a r t o f t h e c r a t o n
Supergroup in the western part of the craton and (Dharwar batholith)
others which are high-strain components of the youn-
get Dharwar batholith (< c2750Ma) that comprises East of the steep belt of mylonites the Dharwar craton
the eastern part of the craton (Chadwick et al 1996). is distinctly different. It is dominated by voluminous
Recent work by Chadwick et al (1989, 1992) has granites, granodiorites and their high-strain gneissic
revealed that the deformation in the Dharwar Super- equivalents, c2750-2550 Ma (Balakrishnan ct al 1990;
group can be explained in terms of NE-SW crustal Friend and Nutman 1991; Krogstad et al 1991, 1995;
shortening which led to ductile folding and localized Peucat et al 1989, 1993; Subba Rao et al 1992;
thrusting verging SW. In contrast, the gneissic base- Zacharaiah et a11995; Nutman et a11996). They host
meat deformed in a less pervasive way in myriad shear a series of linear and irregular schist belts with sedi-
zones and narrow zones of mylonite. These shear mentary and volcanic rocks that have many lithologi-
zones and belts of mylonite are not parts of post- cal aspects in common with the Dharwar Supergroup
Dharwar lineaments as claimed by Srinivasan and in the west. Limited isotopic ages indicate that
Naha (1996). The NE-SW shortening was accompa- volcanism took place in the period c2750-2650 Ma
nied and outlasted by sinistral displacements on N-S (Balakrishnan ct al 1990; Zacharaiah et. al 1995;
and NW-SE wrench faults. The common occurrence of Nutman et al 1996). P b / P b data show that meta-
carbonate in the basement shear zones suggests C Q - morphic recrystallization of the limestones in the
rich fluids played a prominent role in the deformation. Sandur schist belt took place 2475 + 65 Ma ago: the #1
Emplacement of the Chitradurga Granite (c2600 Ma; value of 8.50 contrasts with that of 7.79 of the lime-
Taylor et al 1984) into the Dharwar Supergroup and stones in western Karnataka (Russell et al 1996). The
its basement gneisses appears to have taken place difference in the timing of the metamorphic crystal-
during a late stage of the deformation in the west of lization in western and eastern Karnataka suggests
the craton. Two other bosses of comparable Late that regional heating related to granite emplacement
Archaean granite intrude the basement gneisses in the east of the craton outlasted metamorphic effects
further south (Rogers 1988). in the west. The difference in #1 values suggests a
An alternative view of the structure of the western more evolved sdu~ce for lead in the east of the craton
part of the Dharwar craton has emerged from the compared with the west, but the nature of the sources
interpretation of the Kibbanahalli Arm (figure 1) by is enigmatic.
Chardon et al (1996). They reported that the basal Whereas there are lithological and chronological
rocks in the complex synclinal structure of the similarities between the Late Archaean volcanic and
Kibbanahalli Arm constitute a dScollement with kine- sedimentary rocks in the western and eastern parts of
matic indicators indicating convergence of slip direc- the craton, no precise correlations have been made so
tions towards the syncline axis. They proposed that far. Moreover, there are no reports to date of extensive
this convergence could only be explained by sagduc- areas of orthogneisses as old as the c2900-3300Ma
tion (after Goodwin and Smith 1980), i.e. an effect of Peninsular Gneiss basement which underlies the
vertical movements consequent on gravitational Dharwar Supergroup in the west.
instability driven by deep-seated thermal variations.
Chardon and his co-workers maintained that vertical 3.1 Late A r c h a e a n schist belts
movements related to gravitational instability were
predominant in the development of the Dharwar Critical new work by Matin and Mukhopadhyay
craton and they rejected uniformitarian models based (1987) and Mukhopadhyay and Matin (1993) in the
on crustal shortening and orogenic collapse. There Sandur schist belt, a major tract with the largest
are, however, difficulties with a non-uniformitarian stratigraphic sequence of Late Archaean volcanic and
explanation for the relative elevation of the numerous sedimentary rocks in the eastern part of the craton,
segments of basement in the western part of the raised serious questions about previous interpreta-
craton, for example in the tract of the Dharwar tions of the stratigraphy and structure. Subsequently,
Supergroup between Bababudan and Ranibennur Chadwick et al (1996) showed that its lithostratigra-
(Chadwick et al 1992). We favour a uniformitarian phy youngs consistently from SW to NE and is c35 km
mechanism, namely, elevation of basement segments thick. They attributed this thickness to thrust stack-
as a consequence of NE-SW shortening and transpres- ing, although thrusts are not well exposed and have
sion related to strike-slip movements in the plethora been inferred mostly from gross regional relationships.
The D h a r w a r craton in southern India 253

Claims by Manikyamba and Naqvi (1996) that the opinion that the belt comprised two distinct oceanic
western part of the Sandur schist belt has been suites (Krogstad et al 1989).
overridden by its eastern part are not substantiated
by their field data. Geochemical and isotopic age
3.2 The Dharwar batholith
data from amphibolites in the Ramagiri schist belt
(Zacharaiah et al 1995, 1996) suggest that thrust The voluminous plutonic rocks which surround and
thickening may have occurred in other schist belts in intrude the schist belts in the eastern part of the
the east of the craton. Large-scale, steeply plunging, craton are dominated by granites s.s., granodiorites,
upright, synclinal sheath folds with deep cusps monzonites and diorites of the calc-alkaline suite.
between steep wedges or elongate domes of granite Most were emplaced as steep wedges or elongate
are also an important component of the structure of domes trending N-S or NW-SE: one of the larger
the Sandur schist belt (Chadwick et a11996). Parts of plutons of granodiorite is up to 20 km wide and at
these folds were excised during the NE-SW thrusting. least 100 km long. In addition to late swarms of pale
Our unpublished field data also suggest that the Hutti pink granite dykes trending NW-SE that cut plutons
schist belt north of Sandur has a steep cuspate of granite s.l. and granodiorite, we have found that
structure. mafic dykes of the appinite suite (in the sense of
The irregular outcrop patterns of the Sandur and Pitcher 1993) are also locally abundant. Many of the
Hutti belts contrast with most of the other belts, appinite dykes are podded or folded, but their mixed
including Kushtagi, Ramagiri, Kadiri and Kolar, which melt compositions and discordances with magmatic
have a linear N-S outcrop with steep dips and widths of and tectonic fabrics in their host rocks are clearly
only a few kms. Recognition of the lithostratigraphy in evident.
these linear belts is difficult because of poor exposure, Similar orientations of tectonic fabrics in the schist
intense deformation and lack of unambiguous way up belts and the magmatic and tectonic fabrics in the
criteria. The Hutti, Ramagiri and Kolar belts host plutonic rocks indicate that many were emplaced
economic deposits of gold in steep shear zones. syntectonically, but some granites are post-tectonic,
Most of the schist belts include greywaekes (with e.g. the Joga granite in the north of the Sandur schist
economic deposits of manganese in the Sandur belt), belt (Chadwick et al 1996). Steep, magmatic planar
polymiet conglomerates (with clasts of banded ferru- fabrics and relatively shallow mineral lineations and
ginous chert, metabasalt and granite: some of the elongation of mafic enclaves are parallel to C fabrics
boulders of granite in the conglomerates in the Kolar (Cisaillement, after Berth~ et al 1979) and mineral
belt are up to 1.5 m in size), banded iron formations lineations in persistent N-S or NW-SE belts of
(with major economic deposits of iron in the Sandur mylonites within the plutonie rocks: S - C fabrics and
belt), and rare orthoquartzites (Sandur, Hutti and feldspar a-textures indicate predominantly sinistral
Ramagiri belts) and stromatolitic limestones (Sandur displacements. These relationships are in accordance
belt): the orthoquartzites and limestones indicate with progressive emplacement of steep wedges of
shallow marine conditions. The sedimentary rocks plutonic rocks during regional sinistral transpression.
are interbedded with locally voluminous pillow- The generally steep, sheet or wedge form of the
structured metabasalts, gabbros and ultramafic plutonic rocks contrasts sharply with the predomi-
schists. Acid volcanic rocks are widespread but nance of shallow reflectors in the seismic profile
volumetrically subordinate. Acid volcanic rocks, recorded by Kaila et al (1979), but the reason for the
polymiet conglomerates and sheets of mylonitized contrast is unclear.
granite in the Kolar belt were described together as The scale, distribution and composition of the
the Champion Gneiss by early workers: this unfortu- plethora of Late Archaean plutonic rocks in the
nate misnomer was applied by Smeeth (1915) to many eastern part of the Dharwar craton led Chadwick et al
other parts of the Late Archaean volcanic and sedi- (1996) to propose that they be described as the
mentary rocks of the Dharwar craton. The volcano- Dharwar batholith (figure 1). The batholith has a
sedimentary association in the Sandur schist belt western transition zone dominated by anatectic
accumulated in mainly shallow marine environments granites (e2500Ma; Friend and Nutman 1991) that
in a setting comparable with that of mixed-mode were derived from Peninsular Gneiss, c2900 Ma. The
basins, i.e., with variable intra- and extra-basinal transition zone passes eastwards into mainly juvenile
uplift and subsidence (Chadwick et al 1996). The granites and granodiorites (Krogstad et a11991, 1995;
chemical composition of the volcanic rocks is consis- Peucat et al 1989, 1993; Bhaskar Rao et al 1992).
tent with an intra-are setting (Hanuma Prasad et al Accretion of the batholith took place as a series of
1997). We proposed that the other schist belts are also anatectic and juvenile additions in the form of steep
relics of other intra-arc basins (Chadwick et al 1996), wedges and sheets, but much of the chronology of
a view supported by Krogstad et al (1995) with their pluton emplacement is unclear. Detailed field and
new interpretation of an arc setting for the volcanic isotopic age studies are necessary to resolve the
rocks of the Kolar belt in contrast with their previous outstanding issues of the accretion chronology.
254 Brian Chadwick et al

3.3 The Closepet Granite - A m i s n o m e r subduction beneath the Dharwar craton gave rise to
Andean margin and island arc magmatism. Like
Many maps of the Dharwar craton show a narrow
Newton (1990), Srinivasan and Naha (1993) took
linear belt of granites called the Closepet Granite
the view that the trend of the original basins of the
which is alleged to form the boundary between the
Dharwar Supergroup in the western part of the craton
western and eastern halves. The term was introduced
was E-W. This orientation led them to speculate that
by W F Smeeth early in this century (see Smeeth a Late Archaean volcanic arc which was related to
1915), but it has never been defined unambiguously.
southerly subduction is buried beneath the Deccan
The Closepet Granite is a misnomer because it
basalts. They believed that its associated intra-arc
contains a wide range of plutonic rocks, including
and back-arc basins are represented by the Dharwar
anatectic and juvenile components and their high-
Supergroup south of the Deccan basalts. This model is
strain equivalents. Its boundaries on many maps,
consistent with the geochemistry of the metabasalts
especially in its alleged northern part, do not coincide
(Bhaskar Rao and Drury 1982; Drury 1983), but it is
with those between different polyphase varieties of
inconsistent with the SW vergence of folds in the
granites. On the grounds of these inconsistencies,
supergroup (Chadwick et al 1991) and the site of
we have recommended that the term be abandoned
Dharwar batholith accretion in the east of the eraton.
(Chadwick et al 1996). We are not in favour of the
Chadwick et al (1996) proposed that the two-fold
term Closepet batholith (Allen et al 1986; Jayananda
division of the Dharwar craton into the western part
et al 1995) because it is ill-defined and the plutonic
comprising the basins of the Dharwar Supergroup and
rocks in the linear belt do not warrant special
their sialic basement and the eastern part comprising
distinction from the myriad other components of the
the Dharwar batholith and its Late Archaean schist
Dharwar batholith.
belts is consistent with a convergent plate ~etting. The
western part represents a continental margin (fore-
land) with marginal or back-arc basins represented by
4. Late A r c h a e a n plate tectonic setting the Dharwar Supergroup, whereas the eastern part
o f the D h a r w a r craton represents a batholith and intra-arc basins (the schist
belts) which accreted against the continental margin.
Various plate tectonic models have been proposed for The subduction direction is unclear. The limited
the craton. Among the earliest was the thickening evidence of thrust thickening from NE to SW in the
model of Drury et al (1984) which involved northerly Sandur schist belt (Chadwick et al 1996) and the SW
subduction and stacking of swathes of supracrustal vergenee of structures in the Dharwar Supergroup
rocks and basement slices verging to the south in the north of Honnali (Chadwick et al 1991) suggest that
high-grade area in the south of the craton. Con- subduction was' broadly from west to east. On the
temporaneous effects in the north of the craton were other hand, the back-arc or continental margin setting
believed to include N-verging nappes and backthrusts. of the Dharwar Supergroup suggested by the
Later NS shear zones were interpreted as effects of geochemistry of its volcanic rocks (Bhaskar Rao and
irregularities in the accreting slices. Although this Naqvi 1978; Anantha Iyer and Vasudev 1979; Drury
thickening model explains the granulite facies meta- 1983), and the spatial setting of anatectic granites in
morphism in the south of the craton, it is inconsistent the foreland (Chitradurga granite; Taylor et al 1988)
not only with the regional structure, but also the site and the western part of the Dharwar batholith
of batholith accretion in the east of the craton. (Friend and Nutman 1991) favour east to west
Krogstad et al (1989) also linked the high-grade subduction. The ambiguity in the subduetion direc-
metamorphism in the southeast of the craton with tion is complicated by transcurrent sinistral displace-
collision of continental lithospheric plates and shear- ments in the foreland and the batholith which indicate
ing along a suture zone marked by the Kolar schist an oblique component to the convergent system.
belt which was believed to include intervening oceanic Published isotopic age data from the schist belts
material on the grounds of the geochemistry of the and widely separated parts of the Dharwar batholith
amphibolites. Krogstad et al (1995) presented addi- suggest that granite emplacement took place in the
tional isotopic and geochemical data to substantiate period c2750-2550Ma, whereas volcanic rocks were
their claim that the Kolar schist belt includes a N-S erupted in the period c2750-2650 Ma. Although the
suture. Their latest view is that the suture separates age data are scanty, they suggest that accretion of the
gneisses generated c2630-2550 Ma ago in a continen- Dharwar batholith and its intra-arc basins took place
tal magmatic arc to the west from gneisses that for- for at least c150 Ma. The prolonged thermal activity
med c2530 Ma ago in an evolved island arc to the east. may have been the consequence of basalt underplating
Newton (1990) suggested that the original Kolar that was associated with either a mantle plume or
basin had an E-W strike before it was involved in N-S ridge subduction like that described, for example, by
plate convergence analogous to the model of Drury Haeussler et al (1995). This thermal setting is in
et al (1984). Newton concluded that south to north accord with Jayananda et al (1995) who attributed
The D h a r w a r craton in southern India 255

the Late Archaean granulite facies metamorphism in need for further detailed work on lithostratigraphy,
the southern part of the craton to thickened crust and basin analysis, structure (including seismic profiles),
higher heat flow, perhaps related to a mantle plume. geochemistry and geochronology.
Basalt underplating related to a mantle plume or
subducted ridge is also in accord with the chemical
composition of volcanic rocks from the Sandur schist Acknowledgements
belt reported by H a num a Prasad et al (1997).
Choukroune et al (1995) took an extreme view of the Professor K Naha ventured into the Archaean geology
influence of mantle plumes in the tectonic evolution of of southern India in the 1980s, relatively late in his
the Dharwar craton in particular, and the Archaean in career. He will be remembered primarily for his claim,
general. Their argument was based on the predomi- with his principal co-worker, R. Srinivasan, that all of
nance of vertical structures affecting large volumes of the rocks in the Dharwar craton had experienced the
crust and the alleged absence of evidence of major same chronology of Archaean deformation which was
thrusting in Archaean cratons. In well-exposed high- manifested in what he called "uni t y of structures".
grade Archaean terrains such as southern West This claim was highly contentious although it had a
Greenland, for example, there is abundant evidence positive outcome in the sense that it prompted a closer
of thrusts and fold nappes older than the widespread examination of the data. We remember Prof. Naha
upright structures (Chadwick and N ut m an 1979; with affection as a good friend and a stimulating
Nutman et al 1989; Chadwick 1990). Whereas parts scientific colleague.
of the Peninsular Gneiss basement to the Dharwar We gratefully acknowledge the logistical support of
Supergroup in the western part of the Dharwar craton the Department of Mines and Geology, Government
may appear to be dominated by diapiric structures of Karnataka, Bangalore, and grants from the Royal
of the type described by Bouhallier et al (1993), Society, London, and the University of Exeter, UK.
Choukroune et al (1995) and Chardon et al (1996),
earlier structures like those in the comparable high-
grade gneiss terrain of Greenland may be present in References
the areas of flat-lying Peninsular Gneiss in western
Karnataka, but they have not been identified because Allen P, Condie K C and Bowling G P 1986 Geochemical
of poor exposure. characteristics and possible origins in the southern Closepet
Chardon et al (1996) have extended the non- batholith, South India; J. Geol. 94 283-299
Anantha Iyer G V and Vasudev V N 1979 Geochemistry of
uniformitarian view of deformation in the Dharwar Archaean meta-volcanic rocks of Kolar and Hutti Gold
craton at c3000 Ma to its Late Archaean tectonism. Fields, Karnatak.a, ~ndia; J. Geol. Soc. India 20 419-432
T h ey argued that the schist belts were deformed as a Argast S 1995 Detrital Origin of Fuchsite-bearing Quartzites in
consequence of sagduction (after Goodwin and Smith the western Dharwar craton, Karnataka, India; J. Geol. Soc.
1980) which was caused by gravitational instability. India 45 559-575
Balakrishnan S, Hanson G N and Rajamani V 1990 Pb and Nd
Chardon and his colleagues maintained that gravity- isotope constraints on the origin of high Mg and tholeiitic
driven vertical movements were predominant and amphibolites, Kolar Schist Belt, South India; Contrib.
there was no contribution from tangential tectonics to Mineral. Petrol. 107 279-292
crustal thickening in the Dharwar craton. This claim Beckinsale R D, Drury S A and Holt R W 1980 3,360 Myr old
is at odds with the SW verging folds in the Dharwar gneisses from the south Indian craton; Nature (London) 283
469-470
Supergroup north of the Honnali dome (Chadwick Berth@ D, Choukroune P and Jegouzo P 1979 Orthogneiss,
et a11991), thrust thickening in the Sandur schist belt mylonite and non-coaxial deformation of granites: The
(Chadwick et al 1996), and the gross structure of the example of the South Armorican shear zone; J. Struet. Geol.
Dharwar craton which has aspects closely similar to 1 31-42
those of younger convergent plate settings, namely, a Bhaskar Rao Y J, Beck W, Rama Murthy V, Nirmal Charan S
and Naqvi S M 1983 Geology, geochemistry and age of
continental foreland and a calc-alkaline batholith with metamorphism of Archaean grey gneisses around Channar-
intra-arc basins. Recourse to a non-uniformitarian ayapatna, Hassan District, Karnataka, South India; In
model for the tectonic evolution of the Dharwar Precambrian of South India; (eds) S M Naqvi and J J W
craton by Chardon et al (1996) also contrasts strongly Rogers Geol. Soc. India Memoir 4 309-328
with the wide acceptance of uniformitarian plate Bhaskar Rao Y J and Drury S A 1982 Incompatible trace
element geochemistry of Archaean metavolcanic rocks from
tectonic regimes for comparable Archaean terrains the Bababr..dan Volcanic-Sedimentary Belt, Karnataka; J.
elsewhere, for example, the Superior and Slave Geol. Soc. India 23 1-12
Provinces in Canada, the Yilgarn and Pilbara Blocks Bhaskar Rao Y J, Naha K, Srinivasan R and Gopalan K 1991
in Australia, and the Barberton Mountain Land in Geology, geochemistry and geochronology of the Archaean
South Africa (see general review by Windley 1995). Peninsular Gneiss around Gorur, Hassan District, Karna-
taka, India; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 100
The debate on uniformitarian and non-uniformitarian 399-412
models for the evolution of the Dharwar craton is set Bhaskar Rao Y J and Naqvi S M 1978 Geology and
to continue against the background of a continuing geochemistry of metavolcanics and associated rock types
256 B r i a n C h a d w i c k et al

from the Bababudan schist belt: A late Archaean/early Processes and Metallogeny (eds) J E Glover and S Ho
Proterozoic volcano-sedimentary pile from India; In Arch- University of Western Australia, Publ. 22 3-15
aean geochemistry (eds) B F Windley and S M Naqvi Chardon D, Choukroune P and Jayananda M 1996 Strain
(Amsterdam: Elsevier) 325-341 patterns, d~collement and incipient sagducted greenstone
Bhaskar Rao Y J, Sivaram T V, Pantulu G V C, Gopalan K terrains in the Archaean Dharwar craton (south India); J.
and Naqvi S M 1992 Rb-Sr ages of Late Archaean Struct. Geol. 18 991-1004
metavolcanics and granites, Dharwar craton, South India, Choukroune P, Bouhallier H and Arndt N T 1995 Soft
and evidence for Early Proterozoic thermotectonic(s); lithosphere during periods of Archaean crustal growth or
Precarnb. Res. 59 145-170 crustal reworking; In Early Precamb~ian Processes (eds) M P
Bouhallier H, Choukroune P and Ball~vre M 1993 Diaprism, Coward and A C Ries Geol. Soc. London Spl. Publ. 95 67-86
bulk homogeneous shortening, and transcurrent shearing in Drury S A 1983 The petrogenesis and setting of Archaean
the Archaean Dharwar craton: The Holenarsipur area, metavolcanics from Karnataka Stat~, South India; Geoehirn.
southern India; Precamb. Res. 63 43-58 Cosmochim. Acta 47 317-329
Chadwick B 1990 The stratigraphy of a sheet of supracrustal Drury S A, Harris N B W, Holt R W, Reeves-Smith G J and
rocks within high-grade orthogneisses and its bearing on Wightman R T 1984 Precambrian tectonics and crustal
Late Archaean structure in southern West Greenland; J. evolution in south India; J Geol. 92 3-20
Geol. Soc. London 147 639-652 Drury S A and Holt R W 1980 The tectonic framework of the
Chadwick B and Nutman A P 1979 Archaean structural south India craton: A reconnaissance involving LANDSAT
evolution in the northwest of the Buksefjorden region, imagery; Tectonophysics 65 111-115
southern West Greenland; Precamb. Res. 9 199-226 F a r r e d d u d i n J a n a r d h a n A S and Basavalingu B 1988
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M, Vasudev V N and Viswanatha Sedimentotogy, Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Kala-
M N 1989 Facies distributions and structure of a Dharwar sapura Conglomerate; Geol. Soc. India Memoir" 9 65-82
volcano-sedimentary basin: Evidence for late Archaean Friend C R L and Nutman A P 1991 SHRIMP U-Pb Geochro-
transpression in southern India?; J. Geol. Soc. London 146 nology of the Closepet Granite and Peninsular Gneiss,
825-834 Karnataka, south India; J. Geol. Soc. India 38 357-368
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 1981a Goodwin A M and Smith I E M 1980 Chemical discontinuities
The stratigraphy and structure of the Chitradurga region: in Archaean metavolcanic terrains and the de)elopment of
An illustration of cover-basement interaction in the Late the Archaean crust; Precarnb. Res. 10 301-311
Archaean evolution of the Karnataka craton, southern India; Haeussler P J, Bradley D, Goldfarb R, Snee L and Taylor C
Precamb. Res. 16 31-54 1995 Link between ridge subduction and gold mineralization
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 198tb in southern Alaska; Geology 23 995-998
Structural and metamorphic relations between Sargur and Hansen E C, Newton R C, Janardhan A S and Lindenberg S
Dharwar supracrustal Rocks and Peninsular Gneiss in 1995 Differentiation of Late Archaean Crust in the Eastern
central Karnataka; J. Geol. Soc. India 22 557-569 Dharwar Craton, Krishnagiri Salem Area, south India; J.
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 1985a Geol. 103 629-651
Bababudan - A Late Archaean intracratonic volcano- Hanuma Prasad M, Krishna Rao B, Vasudev V N, Srinivasan
sedimentary basin, Karnataka, Southern India. Part I: R and Balaram V 1997 Geochemistry of Archaean Bimodal
Stratigraphy and Basin Development; J. Geol. Soc. India Volcanic Rocks of the Sandur Supracrustal Belt, Dharwar
26 769-801 Craton, southern India; J. Geol. Soc. India 47 307-322
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 1985b Jayananda M, Martin H, Peucat J-J and Mahabaleshwar B
Bababudan - A Late Archaean intracratonic volcano- 1995 Late Archaean crust-mantle interactions: Geochemis-
sedimentary basin, Karnataka, Southern India. Part II: try of LREE-enriched mantle derived magmas. Example of
Structure; J. Geol. Soc. India 26 802-821 the Closepet batholith, south India; Contrib. Mineral.
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 1986 Petrol. 119 314-329
Detrital Chromite and Zircon in Archaean Sargur metase- Jayaram S, Venkatasubramanian V S and Radhakrishna B P
dimentary Rocks, Karnataka; Geol. Surv. India Spl. Publ. 12 1983 Geochronology and trace element distribution in some
87-96 tonalitic and granitic gneisses of the Dharwar craton; In
Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M, Viswanatha M N and Srinivasa Precarnbrian of South India (eds) S M Naqvi and J J W
Murthy V 1978 Structural studies in the Archaean Sargur Rogers Geol. Soc. India Memoir 4 377-388
and Dharwar supracrustal rocks of the Karnataka craton; J. Kaila K L, Roy Chowdury K, Reddy P R, Krishna V G, Narain
Geol. Soc. India 19 531-549 H, Subbotin S I, Sollogub V B, Chekunov A V, Kharetchko G
Chadwick B, Vasudev V N and Ahmed N 1996 The Sandur E, Lazerenko M A and Ilchenko T V 1979 Crustal structure
Schist belt and its adjacent plutonic rocks: Implications for along Kavali-Udipi profile in the Indian peninsular shield
Late Archaean crustal evolution in Karnataka; J. Geol. Soc. from deep seismic sounding; J. Geol. Soc. India 20 307-333
India 47 37-57 Krogstad E J, Hanson G N and Rajamani V 1991 U-Pb Ages of
Chadwick B, Vasudev V N and Jayaram S 1988 Stratigra- Zircon and Sphene for Two Gneiss Terranes Adjacent to the
phy and structure of Late Archaean volcanic and sedimen- Kolar Schist Belt, South India: Evidence for Separate
tary rocks and their basement in a part of the Shimoga Crustal Evolution Histories; J. Geol. 99 801-816
Basin, East of Bhadravathi, Karnataka; Y. Geol. Soc. India Krogstad E J, Hanson G N and Rajamani V 1995 Sources of
32 1-19 continental magmatism adjacent to the late Archaean Kolar
Chadwick B, Vasudev V N, Krishna Rao B and Hegde G V 1991 Suture Zone, south India: Distinct isotopic and elemental
The stratigraphy and structure of the Dharwar supergroup signatures of two Late Archaean magmatie series; Contrib.
adjacent to the Honnali Dome: Implications for Late Mineral. Petrol. 122 159-173
Archaean basin development and regional structure in the Krogstad E J, Balakrishnan S, Mukhopadhyay D K, Rajamani
western part of Karnataka; J. Geol. Soc. India 38 457-484 V and Hanson G N 1989 Plate tectonics 2.5 Billion Years
Chadwick B, Vasudev V N, Krishna Rao B and Hegde G V Ago: Evidence at Kolar, south India; Science 243 1337-1340
1992 The Dharwar supergroup: Basin development and Kumar A, Bhaskar Rao Y J, Sivaraman T V and Gopalan K
implications for Late Archaean tectonic setting in western 1996 Sm-Nd ages of Archaean metavolcanics of the Dharwar
Karnataka, southern India; In The Archaean: Terrains, craton, South India; Precarnb. Res. 80 206-215
The D h a r w a r c r a t o n in s o u t h e r n I n d i a 257

Manikyamba C and Naqvi S M 1996 Evidence of Archaean Nutman A P, Friend C R L, Baadsgaard H and McGregor V R
crustal shortening from deformed pillow lavas: An example 1989 Evolution and Assembly of Archaean Gneiss Terranes
from Sandur greenstone belt, Dharwar craton; Curr. Sci. 71 in the Godths Region, Southern West Greenland:
476-479 Structural, Metamorphic, and Isotopic Evidence; Tectonics
Matin A and Mukhopadhyay D 1987 Structural Interpretation 8 573-590
of the North Western Termination of the Sandur schist belt; Peucat J J, Bouhallier H, Fanning C M and Jayananda M 1995
Indian J. Earth Sci. 14 214-216 Age of the Holenarsipur Greenstone Belt, Relationships with
Monrad J R 1983 Evolution of sialic terranes in the vicinity of the Surrounding Gneisses (Karnataka, south India); J. Geol.
the Holenarsipur belt, Hassan District, Karnataka, India; In 103 701-710
Precambrian of South India (eds) S M Naqvi and J J W Peueat J J, Mahabaleshwar B and Jayananda M 1993 Age of
Rogers Geol. Soc. India Memoir 4 343-364 younger tonalitic magmatism and granulitic metamorphism
Mukhopadhyay D 1986 Structural Pattern in the Dharwar in the South India transition zone (Krishnagiri area):
Craton; J. Geol. 94 167-186 Comparison with older Peninsular gneisses from the Gorur-
Mukhopadhyay D and Baral M C 1985 Structural geometry of Hassan area; J. Metamorphic Geol. 11 879-888
the Dharwar rocks near Chitradurga; J. Geol. Soc. India 26 Peucat J J, Vidal P, Bernard-Griffiths J and Condie K 1989 Sr,
547-566 Nd and Pb isotopic systematics in the Archaean low- to high-
Mukhopadhyay D and Ghosh D 1983 Superposed deformation grade transition zone of southern India: Syn-aceretion vs.
in the Dharwar rocks of the southern part of the Chitradurga post-accretion granulites; J. Geol. 97 537-550
schist belt near Dodguni, Karnataka; Geol. Soc. India Pitcher W S 1993 The nature and origin of granite; (London:
Memoir 4 275-292 Blackie) 321 pp
Mukhopadhyay D and Matin A 1993 The structural anatomy Radhakrishna B P and Vaidyanadhan R 1994 Geology of
of the Sandur schist belt - a greenstone belt in the Dharwar Karnataka; Geol. Soc. India Bangalore 298 pp
craton of south India; J. Struct. Geol. 15 309-322 Ramakrishnan M 1993 Tectonic evolution of the granulite
Naha K and Chatterjee A K 1982 Axial plane folding in the terrains of southern India; In Continental crust of South India
Bababudan hill ranges of Karnataka; Indian J. Earth Sci. 9 (ed.) B P Radhakrishna, Geol. Soc. India Memoir 25 35-44
37-43 Ramakrishnan M, Venkata Dasu S P and Kroner A 1994
Naha K, Mukhopadhyay D, Dastidar S and Mukhopadhyay R Middle Archaean age of Sargur Group by single grain zircon
P 1995 Basement-cover relations between a granite gneiss dating and geochemical evidence for the elastic origin of
body and its metasedimentary envelope: A structural study metaquartzite from J C Pura Greenstone belt, Karnataka; J.
from the Early Precambrian Dharwar tectonic province, Geol. Soc. India 44 605-616
southern India; Precamb. Res. 72 283-299 Rogers J J W 1988 The Arsikere Granite of southern India:
Naha K, Srinivasan R, Gopalan K, Pantulu G V C, Subba Rao Magmatism and metamorphism in a previously depleted
M V, Vrevsky A B and Bogomolov Y E S 1993 The nature of crust; Chem. Geol. 67 155-163
the basement in the Archaean Dharwar craton of southern Russell J, Chadwick B, Krishna Rao B and Vasudev V N 1996
India and the age of the Peninsular Gneiss; Proc. Indian Whole-rock P b / P b isotopic ages of Late Archaean lime-
Aead. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 102 547-565 stones, Karnataka, India; Precamb. Res. 78 261-272
Naha K, Srinivasan R and Jayaram S 1990 Structural Smeeth W F 1915 Geological map of Mysore; Department of
evolution of the Peninsular Gneiss - an early Precambrian Mines and Geology, Mysore
m i g m a t i t i c complex from south India; Geologische Srinivasan R and Naha K 1993 Archaean sedimentation in the
Rundschau 79 99-109 Dharwar craton, southern India; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India
Naha K, Srinivasan R and Jayaram S 1991 Sedimentational, 63(A) 1-13
structural and migmatitic history of the Archaean tectonic Srinivasan R and Naha K 1996 Apropos of the Sargur Group in
province, southern India; Proc. Indian Aead. Sci. (Earth the early Precambrian Dharwar tectonic province, southern
Planet. Sei.) 100 413-433 India; In Recent Researches in Geology (ed.) A K Saha 16
Naha K, Srinivasan R and Naqvi S M 1986 Structural unity in 43-48
the early Preeambrian Dharwar tectonic province, Penin- Srinivasan R and Ojakangas R W 1986 Sedimentology of
sular India; Q. J. Geol. Mineralog. Metallurg. Soc. India 58 quartz-pebble conglomerates and quartzites of the Archaean
219-243 Bababudan Group, Dharwar craton, south India: Evidence
Naqvi S M 1973 Geological structure and aeromagnetic for early crustal stability; J. Geol. 94 199-214
anomalies in the central part of the Chitaldrug schist belt, Srinivasan R, Subba Rao D V, Pantulu G V C, Sivaraman T V,
Mysore, India; Bull. Geol. Soc. America 84 1721-1732 Balaram V and Gopalan G 1992 Negative Europium
Naqvi S M, Sawkar R H, Subba Rao D V, Govil P K and anomalies and reset Rb-Sr ages of Archaean detrital
Gnaneshwar Rao T 1988 Geology, geochemistry and tectonic metasedimentary rocks of the low-grade supracrustal belts
setting of Archaean greywackes from Karnataka nucleus, of the Dharwar craton, south india; In The Archaean:
India; Precamb. Res. 39 193-216 Terrains, processes and metallogeny (eds) J E Glover and
Newton R C 1990 The Late Archaean high-grade terrain of S E Ho, University of Western Australia Publication 22
south India and the deep structure of the Dharwar eraton; In 295-304
Exposed cross-sections of the continental crust (eds) M H Stroh P T, Monrad J R, Fullager P D, Naqvi S M, Hussain S M
Salisbury and D M Fountain, Kluwer Academic Publishers and Rogers J J W 1983 3000m.y.-Old Halekote Trondhje-
305-326 mite; A record of stabilization of the Dharwar Craton; In
Nutman A P, Chadwick B, Krishna Rao B and Vasudev V N Precambrian of South India (eds) S M Naqvi and J J W
1996 SHRIMP U / P b Zircon ages of acid volcanic rocks in the Rogers Geol. Soc. India Memoir 4 365-376
Chitradurga and Sandur Groups, and granites adjacent to Subba Rao M V, Divakara Rao V, Govil P K, Balaram V and
the Sandur Schist Belt, Karnataka; J. Geol. Soc. India 47 Pantulu G V C 1992 Geochemical and Sr-isotope signatures
153-164 in the 2.6 by Lepakshi granite, Anantapur district: Implica-
Nutman A P, Chadwick B, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha tions for its origin and evolution; Indian Min. 46 289-302
M N 1992 SHRIMP U-Pb ages of detrital zircons in Sargur Swami Nath J, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 1976
supracrustal rocks in western Karnataka, southern India; J. Dharwar stratigraphie model and Karnataka eraton evolu-
Geol. Soc. India 39 367-374 tion; Geol. Surv. India Records 107 149-175
258 B r i a n C h a d w i c k et al

Taylor P N, Chadwick B, Moorbath S, Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N, Ramakrishnan M and Swami Nath J 1982
Viswanatha M N 1984 Petrography, chemistry and isotopic Angular unconformity between Sargur and Dharwar supra-
ages of Peninsular Gneiss, Dharwar acid volcanic rocks and erustals in Sigegudda, Karnataka craton, south India; Y.
the Chitradurga granite with special reference to the late Geol. Soc. India 23 85-89
Archaean evolution of the Karnataka craton; Precamb. Res. Windley B F 1995 The evolving continents (3rd edition)
2 3 349-375 (Chichester: John Wiley) 526 pp
Taylor P N, Chadwick B, Friend C R L, Moorbath S, Zacharaiah J K, Hanson G N and Rajamani V 1995
Ramakrishnan M and Viswanatha M N 1988 New Age Data Postcrystallization disturbance in the neodymium and
on the Geological Evolution of Southern India; J. Geol. Soc. lead isotope systems of metabasalts from the Ramagiri
India 31 155-157 schist belt, southern India; Geoehim. Cosmochim. Acta 59
Venkata Dasu S P, Ramakrishnan M and Mahabaleshwar B 3189-3203
1991 Sargur-Dharwar relationship around the komatiite-rich Zacharaiah J K, Mohanta M K and Rajamani V 1996 Accre-
Jayachamarajapura greenstone belt in Karnataka; J. Geol. tionary Evolution of the Ramagiri Schist Belt, Eastern
Soc. India 38 577-592 Dharwar Craton; J. Geol. Soc. India 47 279-291