Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

(G.R. No. 73748 - May 22, 1986) government.

(There is no "Full-Text" of this case. This is a Minute In view of the foregoing, the petitions are hereby
Resolution made by the SC.) dismissed.
Minute Resolutions
Very truly yours,
EN BANC
(Sgd.) GLORIA C. PARAS
LAWYERS LEAGUE FOR A BETTER
Clerk of Court
PHILIPPINES AND/OR OLIVER A. LOZANO VS.
PRESIDENT CORAZON C. AQUINO, ET AL.
* The Court was then composed of Teehankee, C.J. and Abad
SIRS/MADAMS: Santos., Melencio-Herrera, Plana, Escolin, Gutierrez, Jr.,
Cuevas, Alampay and Patajo,
JJ.------------------------------------------
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a
resolution of this Court MAY 22, 1986.

In G.R. No. 73748, Lawyers League for a Better DIGEST


Philippines vs. President Corazon C. Aquino, et al.;
G.R. No. 73972, People's Crusade for Supremacy of FACTS:
the Constitution vs. Mrs. Cory Aquino, et al., and On February 25, 1986, President Corazon Aquino
G.R. No. 73990, Councilor Clifton U. Ganay vs. issued Proclamation No. 1 announcing that she and
Corazon C. Aquino, et al., the legitimacy of the Vice President Laurel were taking power.
government of President Aquino is questioned. It is On March 25, 1986, proclamation No.3 was issued
claimed that her government is illegal because it
providing the basis of the Aquino government
was not established pursuant to the 1973
Constitution. assumption of power by stating that the "new
government was installed through a direct exercise
As early as April 10, 1986, this Court* had of the power of the Filipino people assisted by units
already voted to dismiss the petitions for the of the New Armed Forces of the Philippines."
reasons to be stated below. On April 17, 1986,
Atty. Lozano as counsel for the petitioners in
G.R. Nos. 73748 and 73972 withdrew the ISSUE:
petitions and manifested that they would pursue Whether or not the government of Corazon Aquino
the question by extra-judicial methods. The is legitimate.
withdrawal is functus oficio.
HELD:
The three petitions obviously are not impressed with
merit. Petitioners have no personality to sue and Yes. The legitimacy of the Aquino government is not
their petitions state no cause of action. For the a justiciable matter but belongs to the realm of
legitimacy of the Aquino government is not a politics where only the people are the judge.
justiciable matter. It belongs to the realm of politics
where only the people of the Philippines are the  The Court further held that:
judge. And the people have made the judgment;
they have accepted the government of President  The people have accepted the Aquino
Corazon C. Aquino which is in effective control of government which is in effective control of
the entire country so that it is not merely a de the entire country;
factogovernment but is in fact and law a de jure  It is not merely a de facto government but in
government. Moreover, the community of nations fact and law a de jure government; and
has recognized the legitimacy of the present  The community of nations has recognized
government. All the eleven members of this Court, the legitimacy of the new government.
as reorganized, have sworn to uphold the
fundamental law of the Republic under her

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen