SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM

Name of School: Division:

Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)

Performance Rating & Equivalent

Thematic Area Computation
Indicators Points
Access (45%) Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
SY 2010-11 750
(3.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase

SY 2011-12 800 6.67% (5.0 - 6.99%)

3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0 % – up)
1 x
SY 2012-13 820 2.50% B. Justification based on Community Mapping

1 – Marginal: At least 85% increase

(85 – 89.99%)
2 – Average: At least 90% increase

Ave. 4.58% (90 – 94.99%)

3 – High: At least 95% increase
(95% – up)

Efficiency % of Dec. Baseline: 7.06

(25%) Dropout Rate
1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
SY 2010-11 5.05% (0.01 - 2.0)
SY 2011-12 2.10% 2.95% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
SY 2012-13 0.25% 1.85% (2.01 – 4.0)

Average: (2.95 + 3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%

2.40%
1.85) / 2 decrease (4.01 – up)
0
Completion Rate: % of Inc. Baseline: 75%
SY 2010-11 94.50% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
SY 2011-12 95.20% 0.74% (5.0 – 6.99%) 2 x
SY 2012-13 96.35% 1.19% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
(7.0 – 9.99%)
Average: 95.35 0.96%
3 – High: At least 10% Increase

0 (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CR

Baseline 75%:
Cohort Survival Rate % of Inc. 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
(5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2010-11 85.50% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
SY 2011-12 90.00% 5.00% (7.0 – 9.99%)
SY 2012-13 96.00% 6.25% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 90.50% 5.63% (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CSR
0
Sub-total: 8.99%
NAT MPS % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
Elementary: Baseline: 67%

SY 2010-11 68.50%
 SY 2010-11 68.50% 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
(2.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase

SY 2011-12 72.50% 5.52% (5.0 – 6.99%)

3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0% - up) or at least an ave.

SY 2012-13 76.30% 4.98% of 75% MPS

Secondary: Baseline: 48%
Quality 2 x
1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase
(30%)
(7.0 – 7.99%)
2 – Average: At least 8% increase
(8.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% Increase

Average: 72.43% 5.25% (10% - up)

or at least an ave. of 75% MPS
OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
2 – Average : 51 – 75%
3 – High : 76 – 100%

Sub-total:
Interpretation Good
Better
Best
Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
mance Improvement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle

Weight Results
Principles Computation
Leadership 30% 14 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Curriculum &
Learning 30% 16 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Accountability 25% 9 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Resource
Management 15% 11 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Subtotal 100% #DIV/0!

Interpretation Good
Better
Best

Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results
A.
Performance 60% 1.55 0.93
Improvement
B. SBM
Assessment 40% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Score (DOD)
TOTAL 100% #DIV/0!

Interpretation:
Developing (Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical
Description
Rating Scale

0.50 – 1.49 Developing

1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

Note: For Operational Try-out

Legend:
Put all data in the light green colored box.

Efficiency:
Drop-out = If the average is more than the baseline (7.06%) put zero ( 0) in the orange box.
 Completion and Cohort Survival = If the average is less than 75% put zero ( 0), if more than 75% and less than 95%
don't make any changes, and if 95% or up put ( 3) in the orange box.

Quality:
Option 1
NAT (National Achievement Test) = if the average is less than 67% for the Elementary, and 48% in the Secondary
put zero (0). Don't make any changes if the average is more than the baseline, and if the average is 75% and up put three
(3), in the orange box.
Option 2
Get the MPS Average then; put one (1) for Marginal, two (2) for Average, and three (3) for High, in the orange box.

Marginal: 26 – 50% Average: 51 – 75% High: 76 – 100%

M back

Computation Results

0.45 0.45

0.25 0.50
 0.3 0.60

1.55

Results

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Results

0.93

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
an 75% and less than 95%

nd 48% in the Secondary

ge is 75% and up put three

r High, in the orange box.

 SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM back
Name of School: ________________________
PEŇARANDA ES Division: ____________
SIBUGAY
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Performance Rating & Equivalent
Thematic Area Computation Results
Indicators Points
Access (45%) Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
SY 2016-2017 291 (3.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase
SY 2017-2018 261 -10.31% (5.0 - 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0 % – up)
0 x 0.45 0.00
SY 2018-2019 237 -9.20% B. Justification based on Community Mapping
1 – Marginal: At least 85% increase
(85 – 89.99%)
2 – Average: At least 90% increase
Ave.
-9.75% (90 – 94.99%)
3 – High: At least 95% increase
0 (95% – up)
Efficiency % of Dec. Baseline: 7.06%
Dropout Rate
(25%) 1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
SY 2016-2017 4.90% (0.01 - 2.0)
SY 2017-2018 8.42% -3.52% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
SY 2018-2019 1.25% 7.17% (2.01 – 4.0)
3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%
Average: 1.83%
decrease (4.01 – up)
1
Completion Rate: % of Inc. Baseline: 75%
SY 2016-2017 56.00% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
SY 2017-2018 78.00% 28.21% (5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2018-2019 90.00% 13.33% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase 2.3 x 0.25 0.58
(7.0 – 9.99%)
Average: 74.67% 20.77%
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
(10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CR
3
Baseline 75%:
Cohort Survival Rate % of Inc. 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
(5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2016-2017 95.59% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
SY 2017-2018 87.01% -9.86% (7.0 – 9.99%)
SY 2018-2019 127.00% 31.49% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 103.20% 10.81% (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CSR
3
Sub-total: 2.33 2.33
NAT MPS % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
Elementary: Baseline: 67%
SY 2012-13 81.19% 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
(2.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase
SY 2013-14 81.98% 0.79% (5.0 – 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0% - up) or at least an ave.
SY 2014-15 76.77% -5.21% of 75% MPS
Secondary: Baseline: 48%
Quality 1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase 0 x 0.3 0.00
(30%) (7.0 – 7.99%)
2 – Average: At least 8% increase
(8.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 79.98% -2.21% (10% - up)
or at least an ave. of 75% MPS
OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
2 – Average : 51 – 75%
3 – High : 76 – 100%
Sub-total: 0.58
Interpretation Good
0.58 X 0.6 0.35
Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
mprovement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle

Weight Results
Principles Computation
Leadership 30% 5 1.00 0.30
Curriculum &
Learning 30% 7 1.00 0.30

Accountability 25% 5 1.00 0.25

Resource
Management 15% 5 1.00 0.15
Subtotal 100% 1.00
Good
Interpretation 1.00 X 0.40 0.40

Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better PART I - 0.58 X 0.60 = 0.35
2.50 – 3.00 Best PART II - 1.00 X 0.40 = 0.40
PART III - 0.35 + 0.40= 0.75

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results
A.
Performance 60% 0.58 0.35
Improvement
B. SBM
Assessment 40% 1.00 0.40
Score (DOD)
TOTAL 100% 0.75
Developing (Level I)
Interpretation:

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

Note: For Operational Try-out

Legend:
Put all data in the light green colored box.

Efficiency:
Drop-out = If the average is more than the baseline (7.06%) put zero ( 0) in the orange box.
Completion and Cohort Survival = If the average is less than 75% put zero ( 0), if more than 75% and less than 95%
don't make any changes, and if 95% or up put ( 3) in the orange box.

Quality:
Option 1
NAT (National Achievement Test) = if the average is less than 67% for the Elementary, and 48% in the Secondary
put zero (0). Don't make any changes if the average is more than the baseline, and if the average is 75% and up put three
(3), in the orange box.
 Option 2
Get the MPS Average then; put one (1) for Marginal, two (2) for Average, and three (3) for High, in the orange box.

Marginal: 26 – 50% Average: 51 – 75% High: 76 – 100%

ck

GAY
 SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM back
Name of School: ________________________
PEŇARANDA ES Division: ____________
SIBUGAY
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Performance Rating & Equivalent
Thematic Area Computation Results
Indicators Points
Access (45%) Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
SY 2016-2017 291 (3.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase
SY 2017-2018 261 -10.31% (5.0 - 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0 % – up)
0 x 0.45 0.00
SY 2018-2019 237 -9.20% B. Justification based on Community Mapping
1 – Marginal: At least 85% increase
(85 – 89.99%)
2 – Average: At least 90% increase
Ave.
-9.75% (90 – 94.99%)
3 – High: At least 95% increase
0 (95% – up)
Efficiency % of Dec. Baseline: 7.06%
Dropout Rate
(25%) 1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
SY 2016-2017 4.90% (0.01 - 2.0)
SY 2017-2018 8.42% -3.52% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
SY 2018-2019 1.25% 7.17% (2.01 – 4.0)
3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%
Average: 1.83%
decrease (4.01 – up)
1
Completion Rate: % of Inc. Baseline: 75%
SY 2016-2017 56.00% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
SY 2017-2018 78.00% 28.21% (5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2018-2019 90.00% 13.33% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase 2.3 x 0.25 0.58
(7.0 – 9.99%)
Average: 74.67% 20.77%
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
(10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CR
3
Baseline 75%:
Cohort Survival Rate % of Inc.1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
(5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2016-2017 95.59% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
SY 2017-2018 87.01% -9.86% (7.0 – 9.99%)
SY 2018-2019 127.00% 31.49% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 103.20% 10.81% (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CSR
3
Sub-total: 2.33 2.33
NAT MPS % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
Elementary: Baseline: 67%
SY 2012-13 81.19% 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
(2.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase
SY 2013-14 81.98% 0.79% (5.0 – 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0% - up) or at least an ave.
SY 2014-15 76.77% -5.21% of 75% MPS
Secondary: Baseline: 48%
Quality 1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase 0 x 0.3 0.00
(30%) (7.0 – 7.99%)
2 – Average: At least 8% increase
(8.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 79.98% -2.21% (10% - up)
or at least an ave. of 75% MPS
OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
2 – Average : 51 – 75%
3 – High : 76 – 100%
Sub-total: 0.58
Interpretation Good
0.58 X 0.6 0.35
Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
mprovement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle

Weight Results
Principles Computation
Leadership 30% 5 1.00 0.30
Curriculum &
Learning 30% 7 1.00 0.30

Accountability 25% 5 1.00 0.25

Resource
Management 15% 5 1.00 0.15
Subtotal 100% 1.00
Good
Interpretation 1.00 X 0.40 0.40

Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better PART I - 0.58 X 0.60 = 0.35
2.50 – 3.00 Best PART II - 1.00 X 0.40 = 0.40
PART III - 0.35 + 0.40= 0.75

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results
A.
Performance 60% 0.58 0.35
Improvement
B. SBM
Assessment 40% 1.00 0.40
Score (DOD)
TOTAL 100% 0.75
Developing (Level I)
Interpretation:

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

Note: For Operational Try-out

Legend:
Put all data in the light green colored box.

Efficiency:
Drop-out = If the average is more than the baseline (7.06%) put zero ( 0) in the orange box.
Completion and Cohort Survival = If the average is less than 75% put zero ( 0), if more than 75% and less than 95%
don't make any changes, and if 95% or up put ( 3) in the orange box.

Quality:
Option 1
NAT (National Achievement Test) = if the average is less than 67% for the Elementary, and 48% in the Secondary
put zero (0). Don't make any changes if the average is more than the baseline, and if the average is 75% and up put three
(3), in the orange box.
 Option 2
Get the MPS Average then; put one (1) for Marginal, two (2) for Average, and three (3) for High, in the orange box.

Marginal: 26 – 50% Average: 51 – 75% High: 76 – 100%

GAY
Enrolment

11E n ro l m e n t
SY 2010-
SY 2011-
12
291
261
SY 2012-
237
13
291
300
261
237
250

200

150

100

50

0
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
D ro p - O u t R a t e
Dropout Rate

SY 2010-
4.90%
11
SY 2011-
8.42%
12
SY 2012- 8.42%
9.00% 1.25%
13
8.00%

7.00%

6.00%
4.90%
5.00%

4.00%

3.00%

2.00% 1.25%

1.00%

0.00%
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
Completion Rate: back
Completion Rate
SY 2010-
11
56.00%
SY 2011-
78.00%
12
SY 2012- 90.00%
90.00%
13
90.00%
78.00%
80.00%

70.00%
56.00%
60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
Cohort Survival Rate
Cohort Survival Rate
back

SY 2010-
95.59%
11
SY140.00%
2011-
87.01% 127.00%
12
SY 2012-
127.00%
13120.00%

95.59%
100.00% 87.01%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
SY 2012-13 81.19%
N AT 81.98%
( N a t i o n a l A c h i e v e m e n t Te s t )
SY 2013-14
SY 2014-15 76.77%

81.98%

82.00% 81.19%

81.00%

80.00%

79.00%

78.00%
76.77%
77.00%

76.00%

75.00%

74.00%
SY 2012-13 SY 2013-14 SY 2014-15
back
SBM-PASBE DCT REPORT ON THE OPERATIONAL TRY-OUT OF THE
REVISED SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS & TOOL

Name of School: _________________ Division: ____________

I. OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE SAMPLE SCHOOL

A. Final Rating
Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance
60% 1.00 Good
Improvement
B. SBM Assessment
40% 1.00 Good
Score (DOD)
Developi
TOTAL 100% ng
(Level I)
Interpretation: Good

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical Rating
Description
Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

B. Recommendations for Continuous Improvement of the School

RECOMMENDATIONS (ACTION
AREAS
PROGRAMS)
Performance
I.
Improvement
A. Access
B. Efficiency
C. Quality
II. SBM PRINCIPLES
Leadership &
A.
Governance

Curriculum &
B.
Instruction

Accountability &
C. Continuous
Improvement

Resource
D.
Management

II. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS TO ENHANCE THE SBM PROCESS & TOOL

FEEDBACK PROCESS TOOL

COMMENTS
SUGGESTIONS

III. MAJOR ISSUES / OPPORTUNITIES IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF SBM-PASBE

AREAS OF
ISSUES OPPORTUNITIES
CONCERNS
Advocacy
Training

Validation /
Accreditation
Process

Provision of
Technical
Assistance to
Schools

Sustainability
Other (Specify):

IV. Recommendations: Input to Regional Technical Assistance Plan & Policy Directions

AREAS OF
ISSUES RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNS
Advocacy
Training

Validation /
Accreditation
Process

Provision of
Technical
Assistance to
Schools

Sustainability
Other (Specify):

Prepared by: SBM-PASBE DCT OF THE DIVISION OF _____________________________

____________________________ _________________________________
Member Member

____________________________ _________________________________
Member Member

_________________________________
Chairman
back
ons
 Sample
SBM e
SBM Template
Template

ACCESS:

GRAPHS EFFICIENCY:

QUALITY:

rra/2013
BM e-toolSBM-PASBE DCT REPORT ON THE OPERATIONAL TRY-OUT OF THE REVISED SB
ASSESSMENT PROCESS & TOOL

ENROLLME
NT COMPLETION
DROP-OUT RATE RATE
COHORT SURV

NAT (NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT RAT

AL RATE