Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1) It asserts the idea of deterrence, the notion that the threat of sanctions can
prevent crimes by creating a fear of punishment for those who might break the law;
2) It adheres to the concept and principle of retribution, the idea that criminal
offenders deserve to suffer for the harm they have done, and their punishment
should be proportionate to the harm inflicted; and
In our democratic society, the CJS serves to fuel the hope that everyone is
equal in the eyes of the law – whether rich or poor, male or female, powerful or
otherwise. But is this reality?
From the perspective of law enforcement, the institution which is the first to
respond to a crime, and is at the frontlines of the fight against crime, the indicators
that the pillars are cracked or broken and the system is failing is all too familiar.
When people cannot obtain justice from the system, their frustration will compel
them to take action.
When the Justice System fails, the people are left with basically two options,
which unfortunately are both criminal in nature.
One, for the criminal or would-be criminal who possess some power to take
advantage of a broken system; he will carry out activities with impunity. An example
is a corrupt government official that steals or funnels huge public to his coffers,
knowing that the weak system can be undermined. He will abuse and even perhaps
order political killings against his opponents. Such a criminals brazenly commit crime
and break the laws that he was supposed to upheld.
The other option is that people will take the law into their own hands. These
could be vigilantes, death squads, salvaging or ELK/EJKs, the kangaroo courts of
the NPA, “rido” or clan-feuding in Mindanao or a rebellion. All these are resorted to
out of frustration for the slow and/or unreliable justice system.
on the other hand, is fueled by the propaganda that the law is a Christian law
designed to favor the Christians and not the Muslims. While these are both
propaganda, they are nevertheless effective because, unfortunately, there is some
truth to it. These are just some of the issues that confront the law enforcers and are
thus also issues for the criminal justice system.
This model of a chain with each link represents each pillar of the justice
system. It suggests that if any link breaks, the chain fails. When a crime is
committed the victim needs to use each link of the chain to obtain justice. If law
enforcement or the investigation fails he will never get to the next link. If the
investigation and evidence is strong yet the prosecution fails or the court fails, the
chain breaks. In any case, Justice breaks!
To most law enforcers, this is a more faithful illustration of how the CJS is
seen to work, or not to work, as the case may be.
The chain model therefore shows that we cannot strengthen one link and
disregard the other because it would have the same result. If law enforcement is
strengthened by adding new recruits or resources, the same input should be done
for the prosecution, the courts and the corrections. If the court is competent, the
investigators and prosecutors must be made equally competent. All the pillars
operate only as just one system. They are interdependent, interconnected and
inseparable.
The failure of one will definitely affect or hamper the efficiency of the other
although each one has its own mandates or functions. It behooves upon each link,
therefore, to help strengthen the other instead of blaming each for the failure of the
system.
Earlier, we identified some realities or factors that cause the pillars to break or
weaken. The people are considered as the claimholders or the beneficiaries of the
system, they have expectations: what today we believe is a revolution of rising
expectations.
People will hold on to the system that will give them greater results. If and
when it results in dismal consequences or an absence of justice, it will fuel and even
give rise to frustrations; in turn opening up minds to alternative options.
Naturally, this uneven progress has led to the existence of the NPA and the
MILF and other enemies of the state and the proliferation of private armed groups.
Conclusion
While we endeavor to find solutions to these problems, let us not however fall
into the legislation trap where the passing of laws is interpreted as having solved the
problem.
We already have so many laws, the problem is full implementation and the
availability of resources to implement them effectively, the accountability that
would sustain it.
Despite this seemingly bleak picture, the PNP is optimistic. We have our PNP
ITP/PGS which has really made a lot of progress. The PNP will continue to work to
strengthen itself as one of the pillars of the Criminal Justice System. But most
importantly the PNP believes that if the CJS is to be effective and responsive to the
needs and expectations of the Filipino people, we must re-orient our perspectives
from a five-pillared solid temple to a chain strengthened and interlinked.