Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IJPGC2000-15034
TURBINE EXHAUST
TURBINE
V E L O C I T Y PROFILE
DISCHARGE
HEADER
~368.8-435.8 M/S) (292.6 M/S) (60.9-228.6 M/S)
\ t210-1430 FT/S 960 FTIS 200-750 FT/S
• ..... " *
41" DUMP
- -. ' ~,,,.
,b/--." (355.6 rnm) (584.2 mm) (584.2 mm)
T E M P E R A T U R E PROFILE TUBEBANK
345~-365 ° F
.8~-184.9° C) , ~ 330" F
425 ° F (165.5 ° C)
(218"3°
STEAM C)"'~, MAXIMUM
(OISC,HARGEHEADE. )
,,,, ~1 --1550-175OF
~""~ (68.30-79.4" C)
330 ° F
-,-
(105.5 ° C)
MAXIMUM
TUBE BANK (165.5 ° C)
MAXIMUM
FIGURE 2 - Model and Test Results of First Experience Steam Dump Arrangement
The recommendations concluded from this example are: 3.1 Detailed Analyses
• Avoid hotwell entry points whenever possible, thereby It is important for two reasons to discuss the detailed
eliminating a pipe loop which can trap water. analyses that are available to the by-pass system designer.
• If the steam dump connection must be located in the Firstly, many of the general guidelines listed in the next section
hotwell, ensure that there is adequate clearance between were supported by detailed analysis and secondly a detailed
the bottom of the steam dump pipe and the hotwell water analysis may be necessary when given design parameters for
level. This is particularly important for multi-shell the by-pass system fall outside of the general guidelines.
condensers where drains into one shell may have to flow The following is a brief overview of three aspects of
into the other shell via a cross-over pipe. detailed analyses, which are available.
2.3.3 Case 3 3.1.1 Vibration Analysis. Much work has been done over the
This condenser was a 125,000 sq.ft, two-pass Titanium years regarding vibration of tubes in heat exchangers. The Heat
Tube unit which received 540,000 lb/hr of steam at 215 psi(a) Exchange Institute (HEI) Standards for Steam Surface
and 426 F (1225 Btu/lb). The steam was distributed through Condensers [2] provides a simplified method which is based on
two 16" Steam dump pipes each with three 30 .... cans" similar forces due to turbine exhaust flows at sonic velocities. This
to the design shown in case 1 (figure 4). The lines were located only examines an allowable deflection in the tube due to the
in the upper exhaust neck with lines running parallel to the flow force imposed on it. Other more detailed analyses are available
and discharging perpendicular to the bundle axis. It was noticed (Pettigrew [3], (Eisinger[4], Connors, H.J.[5]) which examines
after some initial period of operation that a few of the top tubes tube natural frequency with respect to vortex shedding, fluid
of the bundle sheared mid-span between supports near below elastic instability, and random turbulent forces. The computer
the first can. At some point in the investigation two items of analyses have become extremely effective in predicting
operational significance were noted. It was suggested that the damaging vibration however the one key to all these analyses is
possibility existed that steam may have been introduced into the initial velocity distribution model. Steam distribution has to
the condenser without desuperheating. In addition it was noted be modeled and input into these programs. In the design of
that tubes in the top of the condenser bundle were running dry condensers, steam distribution is extremely complex and
at certain times during operation. At this point a tube section typically requires a number of conservative assumptions to
analysis and a vibration analysis examining the possibility of simplify the model.
damage due to flow induced fluid elastic instability were
performed. The conclusion of the tube analysis was that the
tube sheared due to some type of overload with evidence of
high temperatures involved. Although evidence of fatigue was
not present, it was not ruled out. The follow up tube vibration
analysis determined that under normal Steam Dump operation
the calculated tube vibration was well within safe limits. It was
proposed that due to lack of water in the tubes during steam
dump operation the empty tubes expanded to a much greater
FADER
JNDLE
F I G U R E 3 - First C a s e S t e a m Discharge in Hotwell FIGURE 5 - Second Case Center Steam Lane Discharge
F I E L D E X P E R I E N C E ... 1971
HOTWELL ENTRY WITH TYPICAL EXHAUST NECK
HOTWELL DISCHARGE PROTECTION SPRAY
DUMP
HEADER
HOTVVEL~
(3/8" (10 f ~E
CONDENSATE PUMP
DISCHARGE
~ ~ ~ ........... / STEAMDUMP
42" 4
(3/8" (10 r
STEAM DISCHARGES
TO TUBES
STEAM DUMP /
DISCHARGE HEADER