DR. A.P.J.

ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

(Formerly
Formerly Uttar Pradesh Technical University
University)
11, Jankipuram Vistar Yojna, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Sec-11,

Date: 04 September, 2019

TENDER CORRIGENDUM/ADDENDUM

No: AKTU/STORE/571
Following corrigendum is issued with respect to Tender Notice No:
date 02 August, 2019 for "HIRING
HIRING OF MANPOWER PROVIDING AGENCY For AKTU AKTU".

Sr. Point Original Tender Modified Clause

No Number Clause/Corrigendum
Clause Clause
1 Point No. 1.4. Last date of bid submission : Last date of bid submission :
Key Events & 05 September,
Septembe 2019 at 1700 hrs 13 September,
September 2019 at 1700 hrs
Dates
Technical bid opening : Technical bid opening :
06 September,
September 2019 at 1400 hrs 14 September,, 2019 at 11400 hrs
2 SECTION II- Bidder should have an annual turnover Bidder should have an annual turnover of
Qualification of at least Rs. 10crores in each of the at least Rs. 06 crores in each of the
Criteria preceding three Financial years (i.e. preceding three Financial years (i.e. 2016-
2016
2016-2017,
2017, 2017-2018
2017 & 2018-19) 2017, 2017-2018
2018 & 2018-19)

Financial year 2018-19

2018 CA Certified
provisional turnover Certificate is
allowed.
Rest all other clause are applied for FY
2016-17, 2017
17, 2017-18
3 3.10 Payment Payment of those items of the bill in Payment of those items of the bill in
Terms respect of which there is no disp
dispute and respect of which there is no dispute shall
of items in dispute for quantities and/or be processed within 15 days after bills
rates as approved by Registrar will, as submission.
far as possible, be made within a period
of 4(four) months, the period to be
reckoned from the date of receipt of the
bill by the office of the Registrar
complete with
wit the required statements,
certificates and documents etc. as
required.
required
4 Section III- The firm/contractor shall take a Since ESIC Applied for Employees
Scope of Work Workmen Compensation Insurance 15000/ wages so WCIP is not
Under 15000/-
Point-I Policy to cover all its persons deputed required in such cases.
in the University so as to provide
complete cover against all liabilities
under the Workmen’s Compensation
Act, 1923 and submit the same to the
Registrar.
5 5.15 Opening of 5.15 Opening of Bids
Bids The evaluation of the tender
documents will be based on both
technical and financial bids. The
weightage for technical bid would be
55% and financial bid would be
45%.
5.15.1 Opening of Technical Bid
The Bid shall be opened in AKTU
on the specified date and time. In
the event of the specified date of
Bid opening being declared a
holiday for AKTU, the Bids shall
be opened at the same time and
location on the next working day.
5.15.2 Evaluation of Technical Bid
The breakdown of marks with
respect to technical bid will be as
under :
(a) Experience : 25 marks
(b) Turnover : 18 marks
(c) Track record (feed
back from clients) : 12 marks,
The approximate requirement of
workman, subject to variation as
per actual requirement, is
tentatively projected.
a. Tender Evaluation Committee
(TEC) duly appointed by
AKTU shall evaluate the
Technical Bids.
b. The evaluation shall be done
for only those Bidders, whose
Bid Document Fees & EMD
amount is in order as per the
RFP.
c. Bidders need to fulfill all the
Qualification conditions
mentioned in Qualification
Criteria of the RFP. TEC will
examine the Bids to determine
whether they are complete,
whether the Bid format
conforms to the RFP
requirements, whether
documents have been properly
signed, and whether the Bids
are generally in order.
d. Bids of Bidders whose
Opening of Bids
Opening of Technical Bid
In the event of the specified date of Bid
opening being declared a holiday for
AKTU, the Bids shall be opened at the
same time and location on the next
working day.
Overall Bid Evaluation
iv. Evaluation Committee will evaluate
and compare the bids determined to be
substantially responsive.
v. Substantially Responsive bid: A
substantially responsive bid is one,
which confirm to all the requirements,
terms, conditions and specifications of
the Request for Proposal without any
material deviations.
vi. Deviations from or objections or
reservations to critical provisions such
as those concerning performance
security, warranty, applicable Law,
taxes and duties will be deemed as
material deviation.
Bids Not Considered For Evaluation
Bids that are rejected during the Bid
opening process due to incomplete
documentation or late receipt shall not be
considered for further evaluation. The
AKTU, in its discretion, reserves the right
to reject all or any of the Bids without
assigning any reason.
Technical Bid Evaluation
i. The objective of the Technical bid
evaluation is to short list bidders
who have the technical
expertise/skills that are essential to
establish / implement this business
activity as envisaged.
ii. The technical bids shall be evaluated
by the Evaluation Committee based
on each bidder’s ability to satisfy the
requirements set forth in the RFP
Document. The Evaluation
Committee will evaluate the
technical proposals by taking into
account factors mentioned below
1. Experience : 20 Marks Is
Categorized as Below- Certificate of
Incorporation with experience proof
of works executed to proof the
commencement of Business.
 Qualification proposal does not
meet the set criteria shall be
rejected forthwith.
e. TEC may seek oral
clarifications with the Bidders.
The primary function of
clarifications in the evaluation
process is to clarify
ambiguities and uncertainties
arising out of the evaluation of
the Bid Documents. The
Committee may seek inputs
from their professional,
technical faculties in the
evaluation process.
f. Conditional Bids will be
rejected.
g. The decisions of the Tender
Evaluation Committee on
whether the tenders are
responsive or non-responsive
will be final.
h. A Bidder, at any stage of
tender process or thereafter, in
the event of being found after
verification by the Tender
Inviting Authority, to indulge
in concealment or
misrepresentation of facts, in
respect of the claims of the
offer, shall be debarred/black
listed and agreement / contract
/ LOI / work order will be
cancelled.
5.15.3 Bids Not Considered For
Evaluation
Bids that are rejected during
the Bid opening process due to
incomplete documentation or
late receipt shall not be
considered for further
evaluation. The AKTU, in its
discretion, reserves the right to
reject all or any of the Bids
without assigning any reason.
5.15.4 Criteria for Evaluation and
Comparison of Technical Bids
d. Bidders need to fulfill all the
qualification conditions
mentioned in Qualification
Criteria of the RFP. Tender
a) 5 Year .... 05 Marks
b) 5-10 years .....10 Marks
c) 10-15 years .....15 Marks
d) 15 Years and above ...20 Marks
2. Turnover-10 Marks ( Last three
Financial Years) (for lead partner in
case of (vertical Exp Enclosed)
a) Rs 50.00 Crores .....05 Marks
b) Above Rs 100.00 Cores ....10 Marks
3. Track Record to be Taken as
Technical Presentation-20 Marks
a) ISO/SA/OHSAS Certificate etc.-
More than 3 years.
b) Presence in other states.
c) Performance Certificates- Award
& Accreditations.
d) Methodology Plan- Plan for
execution education institute
experiences .
The information furnished by the bidders
in the technical bid shall be the basis
for this evaluation.
Each of the Technical bids shall be
evaluated on a score of 50 points
iv. Each Proposal will be evaluated
according to the following criteria,
but not limited to:
a. Project objective, scope of work
and understanding along with
past experience in projects
executed of similar nature.
Bidders must demonstrate their
experience.
b. The Evaluation Criteria along
with the relevant marks for each
component is summarized above.
c. Capability of the Proposed Team:
Experience and capability of the
proposed team in similar
projects/technologies and
relevant certifications, if any, of
the project team, which might
help in project delivery.
v. Final Score Computation: Based on
the technical evaluation
methodology, each Technical Bid
will be assigned a technical score
out of a maximum of 50 marks as
per the Technical specification.
Evaluation Criteria Table.
 Evaluation Committee (TEC)
will examine the Bids to
determine whether they are
complete, whether the Bid
format conforms to the RFP
requirements, whether
documents have been properly
signed, and whether the Bids
are generally in order.
e. The Bidder needs to strictly
adhere to the formats provided
and provide information
against each of the line items.
Any non-conformance shall
constitute a deviation from
RFP conditions.
f. All relevant documentary
proofs should be submitted
along with the offer. Failure to
submit the Documents along
with the offer could result in
disqualification of the Bid.
5.15.5Opening of Financial Bids
h. Only the Financial Bids of
those firms qualified in the
detailed scrutiny and
evaluation of the Technical
bid conducted by the Tender
Evaluation Committee / order it is mentioned in the technical
Tender Inviting Authority
shall be opened in the second
round.
i. The Financial Bid shall be
submitted in the format given
in this document as Financial
Bid Form (Format – 7). The
Financial Bids submitted in
any other formats will be
treated as non-responsive and
not considered for tabulation
and comparison.
j. The Price offered should be
given strictly on the format
given in the Financial Bid
only. The Bidder must quote
all items.
k. The financial bid offer should
have detail of all payable taxes
and cess.
l. Financials Offered shall be in
Indian Rupees.
The individual bidder technical scores
will be calculated as follows:
iv. Bidders with score of 40 and above in
the technical bid shall be considered
as technically qualified provided he
scores more than or equal to 15 marks
in the technical presentation as
mentioned above.
The financial bid of only the
technically qualified bidders shall
be opened.
v. Technical Presentations: Each bidder
to make a presentation on their
proposed solutions to the Evaluation
Committee and the key points in their
proposals.
vi. The Evaluation Committee may waive
any minor infirmity, nonconformity or
irregularity which does not constitute
a material deviation, provided such
waiver does not prejudice or affect the
relative ranking of any bidder. The
Tender Evaluation Committee
reserves the right to reject any or all
proposals on the basis of any
deviations.
(Please note, the bidders are requested
to furnish the relevant document in the
score table for error free scoring of
technical marks, even if the same
document is furnished before in the
pre-qualification requirement)
Criteria for Evaluation and
Comparison of Technical Bids
g. Bidders need to fulfill all the
qualification conditions mentioned
in Qualification Criteria of the RFP.
Tender Evaluation Committee [TEC]
will examine the Bids to determine
whether they are complete, whether
the Bid format conforms to the RFP
requirements, whether documents
have been properly signed, and
whether the Bids are generally in
order.
h. The Bidder needs to strictly adhere
to the formats provided in RFP and
provide information against each of
the line items. Any non-conformance
 m. If the contract attracts any shall constitute a deviation from RFP
statutory deductions, the same conditions.
will be deducted while settling i. All relevant documentary proofs
the payment. should be submitted along with the
n. There should not be any offer. Failure to submit the
hidden costs. Documents along with the offer
o. In addition to supply and could result in disqualification of the
installation of goods; if AKTU Bid.
requires AMC, then separate Opening of Financial Bids
quote should be given for p. Only the Financial Bids of those
AMC in financial bid. firms qualified in the detailed
5.15.6 Comparison of Financial Bids scrutiny and evaluation of the
c. The commercial quote of the Technical bid conducted by the
Lowest Bidder shall be Tender Evaluation Committee /
notified as L1. In case L1 Tender Inviting Authority shall be
offers to execute the work as opened in the second round.
per the schedule and location q. The Financial Bid shall be
specified in the RFP, the submitted in the format given in this
Tender Evaluation Committee document as Financial Bid. The
(TEC) then shall have the Financial Bids submitted in any
rights to give the order to the other formats will be treated as non-
L1. AKTU may award the responsive and not considered for
contract to the Bidder whose tabulation and comparison.
Bid is found to be most r. The Price offered should be given
responsive, competitive and strictly on the format given in the
technically sound. Financial Bid only. The Bidder must
d. L1 shall be decided on the quote all items.
basis of commercial quote for s. The financial bid offer should have
goods installation as well as detail of all payable taxes and cess.
AMC together. (L1=Quote for t. Financials Offered shall be in
goods installation and quote percentage (%) service change.
for AMC period) u. If the contract attracts any statutory
In case L1 backs out, the RFP shall be deductions, the same will be
cancelled & Bids shall be invited deducted while settling the payment.
again. L1 shall however be blacklisted v. There should not be any hidden
from participating in any future costs.
bidding of AKTU / Government of Comparison of Financial Bids
Uttar Pradesh projects and are liable e. The commercial quote of the Lowest
for legal action by AKTU / Bidder shall be notified as L1. In
Government of Uttar Pradesh. case L1 offers to execute the work as
per the schedule and location
specified in the RFP, the Tender
Evaluation Committee [TEC] then
shall have the rights to give the order
to the L1. AKTU may award the
contract to the Bidder whose Bid is
found to be most responsive,
competitive and technically sound.
In case L1 backs out, the RFP shall be
cancelled & Bids shall be invited again.
L1 shall however be blacklisted from
 participating in any future bidding of
AKTU / Government of Uttar Pradesh
projects and are liable for legal action by
AKTU / Government of Uttar Pradesh.
In Case if L1 Bidders are more than
One then the tender evaluation
committee shall consider the marks
obtained in the technical evaluation
and thus recommend the L1 bidder
with highest marks obtained.
6 Format- 3 : License to engage in the business of This Point is deleted and is not required
Profile of The Private Security Agency issued by
Bidder Competent Authority
Point No-7
7 Format- 3 : Details of make, model, brand and This Point is deleted and is not required
Profile of The quality of tool, equipment and
Bidder consumables to be used
Point No-11
8 8.1 Format 1 – 8.1 Format 1 – Proposal Covering Bank Guarantee 05 % (Percent)
Proposal Letter
Covering Letter Bank Guarantee 10 % (Percent)
9 Section IV - The firm will provide an affidavit to This Point is deleted and is not required
General Terms this effect that “THIS IS TO
& Conditions CERTIFY THAT THE RATES
Point No-07 QUOTED for HIRING OF
MANPOWER PROVIDING
AGENCY TO AKTU, LUCKNOW
IS THE LOWEST. WE HAVE
NOT QUOTED/SUPPLIED AT
LESSER PRICE TO ANY
ORGANISATION WITH THESE
SPECIFICATIONS. IN CASE OF
NON-SUPPLY IN INDIA, THE
AFFIDAVIT TO THIS EFFECT
WILL HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED
BY THE FIRM.
All Other terms and conditions remains the same.

Registrar