The Future of Financial Globalization

By Nabila Izatul Muslimah (041711433153)

It is a known fact in the modern world that globalization has become the main ingredient for
the success of developing countries and their business. Globalization became a major worldwide
force to reckon with since the end of the cold war in the 90s and the disintegration of the Soviet
Union. Countries open their boundaries to marketplace financial system making business
increasingly international. Globalization has opened up fresh chances for growing countries. It
has provided better entrance to urbanized state marketplaces and technology which in turn
guarantees enhanced efficiency and advanced living status (Lim and Lim, 2007). On the other
hand, there are arguments that state globalization has given unwanted confronts such as rising
imbalance all over the world, instability in the monetary market and ecological worsening.

Globalization can be explained as a continuing procedure through which local economies,

cultures, and traditions have been incorporated by a world-spanning system of interaction and
implementation. Lim and Lim (2007) say that procedure of globalization not just comprises
beginning of business world widely, growth of higher sense of interaction, internationalization of
fiscal marketplaces, increasing significance of multinational corporations, population relocations
and further normally amplified mobility people, capital, products, information and concepts other
than moreover pollution, illness, and infections.

There are several insinuations of globalization for a state economy. Globalization has
strengthened interdependence and rivalry among countries in the globe marketplace. India had
received positive impact through globalization on the whole development rate of the market.
This is a chief development considering that the development rate of India in 1980s was
extremely little at 4% and GDP raise in nations such as Korea, Mexico, Brazil, and Indonesia
was in excess of double that of India. However India’s standard yearly increase rate was
approximately twice in the 80s to 6.3%, still it was inferior to the development rate in Indonesia,
Korea, and China.

Globalization is happening, you can’t fight it or stop it. It is a predictable procedure which can
be regulated and adapted. Business plans of Australia, since in the middle of 1990s have been
rapidly increased to start home business to cater to the worldwide marketplace. The main area of
concentration of structural reform has been to ‘focus the private region in Australia to further
rivalry from equally local and worldwide resources (Gligorov and Vladimir, 2007). Australia has
usually had elevated stages of security in the 1960s in regions like fabrics, footwear and clothing,
and vehicle. By the beginning or 80s the successful fading of security in the TCF businesses was
in surplus of 190% and 56.2% for traveler motor cars.

Over 52% of the everyday foreign exchange income experiences changes and alternatives.
This enlargement in temporary fund shifts and hedging has augmentes instability of exchange
rate. The changes in dollar Australia in February 2002 appropriately reveal this. The declaration
of a 1.1% decrease in interest rate through the United States Federal Reserve direct to a plunge in
the dollar of Australia through approximately 2.30% within 22 hours (Kim and Kim, 2008).
Usually a decrease in interest rate must have raised the dollar of Australia other than foreign
exchange dealers think that the decrease in rates of interest would raise returns in the United
State, in the near prospect therefore would raise the value of dollar in United States.

In the case of global trade – The share of India of exports of merchandise to world raised from
0.06% to 0.08% in the previous 2 years. In comparison, in the same period of time China’s share
has tripled to approximately 3.9%. The share of India in the worldwide business is same as
Philippines but the market is 5 times lesser according to International Monetary Fund
approximations. In the past periods foreign direct investment streams into India have a standard
of approximately 0.6% GDP against 4% of Brazil and 6.1% for China. Foreign direct investment
flows to China currently surpasses United States USD 55 billion per annum. In India case it is
USD 5 billion (Hunter, 2008).

Starting of closed market systems: Several successful increasing markets have been engaged
in systematic reform of essential society standards which have been engaged in systematic
reform of essential society standards which have gone unnoticed in the urbanized countries. The
aspects which cause development and financial combination integrate possessions freedoms,
legal process, published principle, personalization of state owned organizations, elimination of
assets administration, and liberalization of standards connected FDI (Simic and Predrag, 2008).

Increasing economies: Over the last decades India and China has observed a 10% and 8% of
yearly development correspondingly. Markets currently typify younger society, growing number
of educated and skilled people, rising middle income group populations, inspiring profits and
development (Simic and Predrag, 2008).

Measures on top of plan fronts and the skill to distinguish transforms, to take on and
acclimatize to fresh technology, and to restructure quickly will decide the capability of the
industrious segment in small nations to take action to the latest chances. Governments,
organizations, and human beings should obtain familiar to a need durability.

Cash facilities and employ of IT and electronic commerce show how to instances of the type
of innovative chances on offer to small nation in the latest worldwide market. Previous parts of
the mission team account, on the changeover to a novel worldwide business atmosphere and
making capability, embark the type of home plans and outside help that will place small nations
to receive benefits of these chances.

Globalization as a phenomenon is a very complex one. We have seen instances where

developed nations might face a situation of stagnation, whereas some nations had have
undergone financial catastrophe and practiced economic retrogression due to internalization
(Schott, 2008). Furthermore, we cannot deny the surprising emergence of upcoming
powerhouses like China and India. They are proofs that global liberalization and competition
enhances consumer price. It is safe to state that globalization has its benefits and ill effects. It
impacts distinctive sectors, countries, business, and sections in a dissimilar way. Even though
developing countries might reap great reward from it, uncontrolled and unregulated globalization
may lead to economic turmoil. What we all agree upon is the fact that the market economy in the
hands of private enterprises and capitalists without proper supervision might lead to difficult
situations reminiscent of neocolonialism. Essential steps should be taken at a national and
international level to neutralize the harmful effects and to achieve the accolades of globalization.

It is people who are the objects of globalization and at the same time its subjects. What also
follows logically from this is that globalization is not a law of nature, but rather a process set in
train by people. So love it, hate it, the fact remain that globalization is here to stay.
 REFERENCES

Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bragues, George. Review of The Dollar Trap: How the U.S. Dollar Tightened Its Grip on
Global Finance by Eswar S. Prasad. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 17, No. 4
(Winter 2014): 535–542.

Erian, J, 2017, The Future of Economic and Financial Globalization. Available at:
www.jia.sipa.columbia.edu

Escobar, J, 2012, The Future of Financial Globalization. BIS Papers (69), 397. Available at:
www.bis.org

Gent, J, n.d, India: Financial Globalization, Liberal Norms, and The Ambiguities of
Democracy. Available at: www.politics.virginia.edu

Kose, M.Ayhan, Eswar Prasad, Kenneth Rogoff, and Shang-Jin Wei, 2006, “Financial
Globalization: A Reapprolisal,” Harvard University, Desember. Available at:
www.economics.harvard.edu

Mishkin, Frederic S., 2006, The Next Globalization: How Disadvantaged Nations can
Harness their Financial System to Get Rich (Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press).